Skip to main content
Download PDF

Xander: employing a novel method for efficient gene-targeted metagenomic assembly

Microbiome volume 3, Article number: 32 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Metagenomics can provide important insight into microbial communities. However, assembling metagenomic datasets has proven to be computationally challenging. Current methods often assemble only fragmented partial genes.

Results

We present a novel method for targeting assembly of specific protein-coding genes. This method combines a de Bruijn graph, as used in standard assembly approaches, and a protein profile hidden Markov model (HMM) for the gene of interest, as used in standard annotation approaches. These are used to create a novel combined weighted assembly graph. Xander performs both assembly and annotation concomitantly using information incorporated in this graph. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by assembling contigs for one phylogenetic marker gene and for two functional marker genes, first on Human Microbiome Project (HMP)-defined community Illumina data and then on 21 rhizosphere soil metagenomic datasets from three different crops totaling over 800 Gbp of unassembled data. We compared our method to a recently published bulk metagenome assembly method and a recently published gene-targeted assembler and found our method produced more, longer, and higher quality gene sequences.

Conclusion

Xander combines gene assignment with the rapid assembly of full-length or near full-length functional genes from metagenomic data without requiring bulk assembly or post-processing to find genes of interest. HMMs used for assembly can be tailored to the targeted genes, allowing flexibility to improve annotation over generic annotation pipelines. This method is implemented as open source software and is available at https://github.com/rdpstaff/Xander_assembler.

Background

Metagenomics faces scalability challenges stemming from the amount of raw sequencing data necessary to describe complex microbial communities, now often termed the microbiome [1, 2]. Metagenomic assembly has been an area of growing interest in the past decade, with early datasets assembled using single-genome assembly methods that had difficulty with metagenomic samples [3, 4]. The tendency for assemblers to only assemble dominant organisms while producing only fragmented partial assemblies for less dominant organisms, with limited recovery for any individual genes, has been an impetus to develop better metagenomic-specific assembly methods [5, 6].

We propose a gene-targeted assembly approach called Xander for assembling metagenomic datasets. Xander is a de Bruijn graph [7] assembler [8] that uses external information to perform a guided, instead of exhaustive, traversal of the assembly graph. Xander uses profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) [9] to guide graph traversal (HMM-guided assembly). An HMM can be considered as a directed probabilistic graph. Built from the alignment of a set of homologous sequences, an HMM quantifies position-specific conservations of the underlying sequence family. Using an HMM, the paths most likely to code for the target gene can be extended first thus limiting the portion of the assembly graph that must be explored. In addition to limiting the graph traversal, the HMM provides a measure of how likely the resulting assembled contig comes from the supplied model and, by inference, whether the contig actually codes for the gene of interest. Xander enables researchers to target specific genes involved in biologically interesting pathways without using amplicon-based sequencing approaches that are prone to primer limitations and PCR artifacts and that produce sequences too short to more fully characterize the genes.

Gene-targeted assembly is less resource intensive and faster than traditional whole-genome metagenomic assembly. In addition to the de Bruijn graph, only small paths relative to the graph’s size must be kept in memory. In our initial implementation, further reductions in memory usage are achieved by using a probabilistic data structure for holding the graph in memory, a Bloom filter [10–12]. By targeting relatively small segments of the assembly graph using an HMM to guide assembly, the amount of the graph that must be explored during assembly is constrained, providing a speedup over whole-genome approaches.

The targeted assembly of metagenomic datasets has drawn research interest, generating several approaches including EMIRGE, Mira, and SAT-Assembler [13–15]. These targeted methods first identify reads likely to be from targeted genes before assembly, as does the reference-assisted assembler IDBA-Hybrid [16]. Instead, Xander begins with a de Bruijn graph representation based on all reads, as most current bulk assemblers do. A de Bruijn graph approach has also been used for a BLAST-like search algorithm, BlastGraph [17]. BlastGraph uses a graph representation of a reference database that can then be queried with unknowns, whereas Xander queries the graph representation of metagenomic reads using HMMs. Other work used an HMM to search sequences in an indexed tree structure [18], but only short HMMs up to length 12 were tested.

We validated our method using defined community metagenomic data and then applied the tool to 21 rhizosphere soil samples totaling 800 giga base pairs (Gbp) from three different biofuel crops. We targeted three genes: one conserved taxonomic gene and two genes from different parts of the nitrogen cycle that are both critical to plant productivity.

Implementation

Xander graph structure

Xander requires two sets of input sequences: a set of reference sequences of the targeted genes to build a protein profile HMM and one or more metagenomic read files to build a de Bruijn graph (DG). An HMM can be considered as a directed probabilistic graph with transition and emission probabilities between states. A novel graph structure was created to combine the DG and HMM together into a single combined weighted assembly graph (CAG) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

The Xander combined weighted assembly graph structure. M, I, and D represent HMM match, insert, and delete states, respectively. Numbers represent state position on the HMM. For simplicity, a kmer length of 6 is used and weights of the edges are not shown. The vertices shown in bold on the de Bruijn graph and profile hidden Markov model are combined to form the bold vertex in the combined graph. The green solid arrows represent all possible outgoing edges from these vertices. Boxes with ellipses indicate additional omitted graph structure. The delete HMM state is combined with the de Bruijn graph vertex from the last match; this carries forward the state information necessary to correctly form subsequent vertices in the combined graph. During path search, if this combined vertex becomes the best scoring vertex in the open set, it is removed from the open set and the adjacent combined vertices are instantiated and added to the open set

Full size image

For a graph G, let V(G) and E(G) be the vertex set and edge set, respectively. A vertex w in CAG is created for every pair of vertices u and v, where u belongs to V(DG) and v to V(HMM). The total number of vertices in CAG will be |V(DG)| * |V(HMM)|. The edge \( \overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j} \) between vertices w i and w j in the edge set E(CAG) is made by combining vertices v i with u i and v j with u j , respectively:

\( \overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j\ }\in\ E\left(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{A}\mathrm{G}\right)\ \leftrightarrow\ \overrightarrow{v_i{v}_j\ }\in\ E\left(\mathrm{H}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{M}\right)\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\kern0.5em \overrightarrow{u_i{u}_j}\ \in\ E(DG) \) if v j is an insert or match state.

\( \overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j\ }\in\ E\left(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{A}\mathrm{G}\right)\leftrightarrow\ \overrightarrow{v_i{v}_j\ }\in\ E\left(\mathrm{H}\mathrm{M}\mathrm{M}\right)\kern0.5em \mathrm{and}\ {u}_i={u}_j \) if v j is a delete state.

The weight of an edge \( \overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j} \) in CAG is defined as the log of the product of the transition and emission probabilities taken from the HMM:

\( \mathrm{weight}\left(\overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j}\right) \) = log [ℙtransition(v i →v j )] + log [ℙemission(v j )] if v j is a match state, \( \mathrm{weight}\left(\ \overrightarrow{w_i{w}_j}\ \right)\kern0.5em =\kern0.5em \log \left[{\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}}_{\mathrm{transition}}\left({v}_i\ \to\ {v}_j\right)\right] \) otherwise.

The emission symbol is the terminal character(s) in the substring of length k (kmer) contained in u. The underlying DG graph is constructed in nucleotide space regardless of whether the HMM is modeling protein or nucleotide sequences. When searching with a protein HMM, the DG graph is converted to protein space by walking three vertices in any one direction at a time. The emission symbol then becomes the last three nucleotide characters of the kmer translated to a single amino acid (aa). The vertex chosen to begin graph traversal thus determines the translation reading frame.

By default, Xander builds a graph using all the kmers from the reads regardless of the abundance of the kmers. Xander implements a counting Bloom filter to store the counts of each kmer. This allows optionally filtering out kmers failing to meet the minimum abundance cutoff during the graph-building step.

Assembly approach

Xander assembly starts at a vertex corresponding to a kmer contained in the target gene. Since starting vertices can be in any model position, not just the beginning of the model, a second HMM is built from the reverse of the seed alignment used to build the forward HMM. Using this reverse model, Xander can traverse paths in both directions from a starting vertex. From a starting vertex, Xander searches for the best path through the CAG to a goal vertex, a vertex corresponding to one end of the HMM. The contigs generated by each search direction are output separately and then combined into a single contig.

To identify starting kmers, Xander uses a set of aligned reference sequences from the target genes and the read files. The reference set used at this step can be larger than the one used to build HMMs and can include partial and lower quality sequences to provide broader coverage of the organisms. All overlapping kmers from the reference sequences are stored in a hash table. Each read is decomposed into kmers to search for matches in the hash. If a perfect match is found, the kmer, alignment position, and corresponding implied HMM match states form a starting vertex for the next assembly step. For use with a protein HMM, a peptide kmer length of one third of the input kmer size is used and input reads are translated into all six reading frames. When assembling multiple target gene families, the reference sets can be combined together into a single hash so that search starts can be identified in a single pass over the reads.

To assemble contigs, Xander searches from the starting vertices corresponding to the identified starting kmers using the A* search algorithm [19] to find the best paths through the CAG. The set of goal vertices is defined as any vertex constructed from the terminal HMM model position match or delete state. The scoring function for a path P is defined as follows: \( S(P)={\displaystyle {\sum}_{i=1}^{\left|P\right|}}\mathrm{weight}\left(\overrightarrow{w_{i-1}{w}_i}\right) \) where the weight function returns the weight of the edge between two vertices in P.

The A* algorithm maintains an “open set” of examined partial paths from the starting kmer ending in a vertex w. The open set is sorted by the expected score for the best path through w to a goal vertex, which is equal to the sum of the score of the partial path to w and of the score from w to a goal vertex using a heuristic cost function h(w). Let vertex v be the HMM component of w and m i be the match state HMM vertex following v. h(w) is defined as follows:

$$ h(w)= \log \left[\mathrm{\mathbb{P}}\left(v\to {m}_i\right)\right]+{\displaystyle \sum_i^{L-1}} \log \left[\mathrm{\mathbb{P}},\left({m}_i,\to, {m}_{i+1}\right)\right] $$

That is, the sum of the most likely state transitions from v to the end of the model, where ℙ is the probability of the given transition and emission of the most likely amino acid, and L is the length of the HMM. Since this is the best scoring path from v to the goal for any possible sequence, it meets the admissibility criteria for A*.

The emission probabilities produced by HMMER are normalized to a null model, meaning that some normalized emission values are greater than one. To ensure the log-odds edge weights used by the heuristic score and the scoring function were both monotonic, the log of the maximum normalized match emission probability was subtracted from the edge weights for the preceding match → match, insert → match, match → delete, delete → match, and delete → delete edges. These modified weights are used except where we explicitly refer to the unmodified weights below.

The A* algorithm proceeds by successively examining the best scoring vertices from the open set. If a best scoring vertex w is not a goal vertex, the adjacent vertices are added to the open set and w is removed from the open set and added to a closed set. We cache the best paths found from previous searches to speed up subsequent searches. If w is on a cached shortest path, we only open the path to the next vertex on the cached best path.

A path-pruning heuristic modification to the A* search is implemented in Xander to terminate paths that are unlikely to yield contigs that match the model well. In addition to the path score calculated from the monotonic (modified) edge weights, a standard HMM score is calculated from the unmodified weights and maintained for each partial path, along with the position of the maximum HMM scoring vertex w m in the path to w. When a vertex w reaches the top of the open set, it is discarded (pruned) if the HMM score along the path to w has not improved within a user-specified number of vertices. In the event a search terminates (the open set is empty) before reaching the end of the model, the path to w m , the intermediate vertex with the highest HMM score is returned.

The A* algorithm only finds one single shortest path from a starting vertex. To explore microheterogeneity, Xander implements an option to find multiple high-scoring paths from a single starting vertex using Yen’s K shortest path algorithm [20]. This algorithm iteratively finds the shortest path then the second shortest path to the kth shortest path. This is sped up by the observation that the ith shortest path in the sequence must branch from one of the i − 1 shortest paths already identified. Yen’s algorithm can be further improved by the observation that the ith shortest path must branch from its parent j after the point j branched from its parent [21]. In Xander, we have modified Yen’s algorithm to find the next best path P i containing at least one edge not present in the previously found i − 1 best paths. This avoids a combinatorial explosion of best paths from a small number of minor variations. A contig sequence may still be common for multiple paths, representing variations in the alignment between the HMM and the sequence, so additionally, the implementation does not return paths that do not contain any previously unseen kmers. In this way, each of the K paths returned contains new sequence information.

HMP-defined community data

The Human Microbiome Project (HMP)-defined community consists of 22 human-gut-associated microorganisms (Additional file 1: Table S1). Only the 20 bacterial organisms were used in this analysis. The reference genomes were downloaded [22], and the annotations for each organism were downloaded from GenBank. Two whole-genome shotgun sequence datasets for the HMP-defined community were downloaded from NCBI’s Short Read Archive (SRR172902, SRR172903). The two datasets were combined for analysis in this study. The combined set consists of a total of 1037 Mbp of length 75 bp Illumina reads. Quality filtering was performed by trimming reads at a quality score of “B” as recommended by Illumina (CASAVA 1.7 User Guide) using the RDPTools ReadSeq package [23].

Rhizosphere soil data

Metagenomic sequence was produced by the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) as part of the Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center’s (GLBRC) sustainability research theme. The samples derive from rhizosphere soil collected at Kellogg Biological Station intensive sites [24] in October 2012 from three biofuel crops: Zea mays (corn), Miscanthus × giganteus (Miscanthus), and Panicum virgatum (switchgrass). For each crop, there are seven biological replicates (Additional file 1: Table S2). Sequence reads and metadata are available from JGI [25]. Each read file contains paired-end reads of length 150 bp from one lane of Illumina HiSeq, one file, or lane, per rhizosphere sample. We downloaded the bulk assembly contigs (minimum length 300 bp) from MG-RAST [26]. In brief, these bulk assemblies were created by first merging the paired-end reads, then all seven replicates of each crop were pooled together before assembly using the diginorm/partitioning assembly pipeline [27] (see Additional file 1). To be consistent with the bulk assembly, we used the merged reads as the starting data for Xander assembly.

HMM construction

HMMs were built using the “seed sequences” for the corresponding genes from RDP’s FunGene site [23]. These seed sequences were used to build a forward HMM and a reverse HMM for each gene using a modified version of HMMER3 [28]. Since HMMER3’s default settings are tuned for detecting remote paralogs [29] whereas Xander is targeting close homologs, we used the “-- enone” option to disable sequence weighting. The default priors sometimes caused extensive searching of nonproductive insert and delete paths. HMMER3’s source code was modified to change the prior probabilities for the delete → match and insert → match transitions to 95 % probability and delete → delete and insert → insert transitions to 5 % probability. The modifications to HMMER3 are available as a patch file against version 3.0.

Reference sets

From FunGene release version 7.5.3, we downloaded a set of 263 unique near full-length nitrite reductase (NirK) protein and corresponding nucleotide sequences using the following filters: minimum aa 300; minimum HMM coverage 80; and minimum HMM score 300. The average length of the protein sequences was 410 aa. A set of 1734 near full-length ribosomal protein L2 (RplB) protein and corresponding nucleotide reference sequences (average length of 280 aa) was selected from the same site with these filters: minimum aa: 250; minimum HMM coverage 90; and minimum HMM score of 440. For nitrogenase reductase (NifH), we used the set of 782 near full-length reference sequences with average length of 300 aa that was used as references for the FrameBot tool in a previous publication [30]. These protein reference sets were used with Xander to identify starting kmers and by FrameBot to find the closest matches to the contigs. The nucleotide reference sets were used with UCHIME [31] to detect chimeras. All these reference sets are available from the Xander_assembler package (see Availability and requirements below).

Bulk assembly of rhizosphere soil data

Bulk assemblies were provided by Jiarong Guo. The following section briefly describes the bulk assembly steps [Jiarong Guo, personal communication] for the 21 rhizosphere soil samples deposited in MG-RAST [26]. The raw reads were trimmed starting at bases with the quality score of “#” near the distal end and the paired-end reads were merged using Flash [32] with parameters “-m 10 -M 120 -x 0.20 -r 140 -f 250 -s 25 -t 1.” The sizes of the merged files in FASTA format range from 27 to 57 gigabytes (GB) (Additional file 1: Table S2). The merged reads from all seven replicates of each crop were pooled together before bulk assembly using the diginorm/partitioning assembly pipeline [27]. The minimum length of contigs is 300 bp. The reads were mapped to the contigs using BWA [33].

Targeted gene identification in bulk assembly

Protein sequences were translated from the bulk assembly contigs downloaded from MG-RAST using FragGeneScan [34]. We used HMMER3 to search for NirK, NifH, and RplB from these protein sequences using the forward HMM models used by Xander. Only hits with a minimum HMM score of 50 were retained. Hits were clustered at 99 % aa identity. The closest matches to the representatives were identified using the RDP AlignmentTool package [23] against the protein reference sets.

Xander processing steps for rhizosphere data

For each of the three genes and for each sample (either individual or pooled), we used Xander to assemble one best contig from each starting kmer of length 45. To be comparable to the metagenomic assembly contigs, assembled contigs shorter than 300 nucleotides or with an HMM score less than 50 were discarded. A few post-assembly steps were included as part of the analysis (Fig. 2). We clustered the assembled contigs at 99 % aa identity and chose a set of representative nucleotide and protein contigs (the longest contig from each cluster). The 99 % aa identity cutoff was used for contig clustering throughout the analysis unless otherwise noted. Chimeras were identified using UCHIME against the nucleotide reference set. The closest matching reference sequences to these representative contigs were identified using FrameBot. Read mapping and kmer coverage estimates were also performed as described below.

Fig. 2
figure2

Xander gene assembly workflow. Two types of input sequences are required: one or more metagenomic read files used to build the de Bruijn graph and one set of reference sequences for each targeted gene, for building specialized profile HMMs using a modified version of HMMER 3.0 (see the “Implementation” section). During the search phase, Xander uses a combined weighted assembly graph to assemble genes (contigs). After assembly, several filters are applied at the quality filter step: chimeric genes, or genes below length cutoff or HMM score cutoff are discarded, and genes are clustered at 99 % aa identity and the longest one from each cluster is chosen as the representative. The quality-filtered genes are further processed to provide coverage and abundance information

Full size image

Gene abundance and kmer coverage estimate

We used the single copy core rplB gene to normalize gene abundance. The relative abundance for a particular gene, e.g., nirK, was estimated as the ratio of the number of reads covering at least one kmer in the nirK gene contigs divided by the number of reads covering at least one kmer in the rplB gene contigs. The same kmer length used for the assembly step was used to estimate coverage.

The mean nucleotide kmer coverage for each representative nucleotide contig was calculated from the reads using a tool included in the Xander package. When a read had a kmer present in multiple contigs, the counts for that kmer were equally divided among the contigs to avoid overcounting. The kmer coverage of a contig is then calculated as the mean counts of all the kmers included in that contig.

Ordination analysis

For each of the nirK and rplB genes, the representative protein contigs from each of the 21 rhizosphere soil samples were aligned using HMMER3 and all samples clustered together using RDP mcClust [23] with the complete linkage algorithm. The operational taxonomic unit (OTU) abundances at 95 % aa identity were corrected using the mean nucleotide read coverage of each contig before principal component analysis (PCA). Vegan package version 2.0-3 in R 2.15 was used to perform PCA.

SAT-Assembler processing

SAT-Assembler [15] was run with the default settings. The HMMs were created with the unmodified HMMER 3.0, with the seed sequences used for creating Xander-specific HMMs.

Computer resources

The MSU High Performance Computing Center (HPCC) [35] cluster was used for the majority of experiments. SAT-Assembler failed to complete assembly of the HMP + corn 1 dataset after 7 days, the maximum allowed runtime on the HPCC (Xander completed all steps in 12 h). We assembled these data with SAT-Assembler by using a faster machine (iMac with 3.2-GHz Intel Core i5 processor with local drive) in 124 h.

Results

HMP-defined community analysis

We used the HMP-defined community data to evaluate Xander’s performance with rplB genes selected as the initial assembly targets. The rplB gene was selected because it is a well-conserved single-copy core gene. Each defined community organism has a single copy of the rplB gene, and the gene sequences of several members share identical kmer of length 30 or greater. The average length of the rplB genes from the defined community organisms is 825 bp.

We evaluated Xander assembly quality by tuning three parameters: kmer length, minimum kmer cutoff, and prune cutoff. Since none of the rplB sequences from the defined community members are covered by kmers of length 60, we tested kmer lengths of 30 and 45. For kmer lengths of 30 and 45, we built de Bruijn graphs with a minimum kmer cutoff 1 (count 1 defined community graph) or 2 (count 2 defined community graph). We then searched the defined community graph using all the starting kmers identified in the reads using the 20 bacterial members of the defined community (Additional file 1: Table S1) as a reference set. We measured the number of differences between the nucleotide contigs and the rplB genes from the defined community members. When a kmer length of 30 was used, Xander was able to assemble some full-length contigs that match with no or few differences to the defined community members but produced some chimeric contigs between defined community members (see Additional file 1). We found that using a larger size kmer of 45 reduced the number of chimeras returned from 30 % with length 30 to 0.3 % (one partial-length sequence).

The sets of unique contigs returned were identical to the results without heuristic pruning for values of prune of 5, 10, 15, and 20, except the count 1 defined community graph search with prune 5 returned one sequence 21 bases shorter at the 3′ end. In all cases, decreasing the value of the prune decreased the total number of vertices opened, although the relative savings were greater for the kmer length of 45 (Table 1). The number of vertices opened using the length 45 count 1 defined community graph with prune 20 was only 10.7 % of the number opened without pruning. It is worth mentioning that the number of vertices opened without pruning using kmer length of 45 is only 0.76 % of the ones opened using kmer length of 30 with count 1 defined community graphs.

Table 1 Percent of vertices opened with pruning compared to no pruning with the corresponding length and count
Full size table

Xander can produce multiple paths from one starting kmer using a modified Yen’s K shortest path algorithm. To explore multiple paths, we used the de Bruijn graph of kmer length of 45 to search the best 1000 paths from one starting kmer that produced a contig perfectly matching Staphylococcus epidermidis. Xander assembled 176 unique nucleotide contigs. These contigs formed six clusters at 99 % aa identity. No chimeric sequences were found. The representative nucleotide contigs shared 98.5 to 99.9 % nucleotide identity to S. epidermidis.

Mixing HMP and corn rhizosphere data

We tested how well Xander assembly worked when the HMP-defined community data were mixed with reads from rhizosphere sample C1 (corn replicate no. 1). We built a de Bruijn graph of size 33 GB using kmer length of 45 and minimum count of 1. We searched this graph for rplB using the starting kmers from the HMP-defined community and assembled 79 unique contigs. Six contigs were chimeras with parents related to Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus megaterium, Enterobacter sp. and Serratia marcescens, or Deinococcus radiodurans with an unknown second parent (this latter chimera was obvious from inspection). The remaining contigs formed 19 clusters at 99 % aa identity. Compared to the results using the defined community reads alone, Xander assembled a representative full-length contig perfectly matching S. epidermidis. Xander also assembled one partial representative contig matching Streptococcus mutans and one matching S. aureus with 1 and 2 mismatches, respectively. In addition, although we only searched starting from kmers in the HMP-defined community, Xander assembled contigs matching rplB reference sequences not present in the defined community: one full-length contig sharing 99 % nucleotide identity with B. megaterium, one full-length contig, and one partial contig sharing 99 % nucleotide identity with Enterobacter cloacae.

We explored the effect of kmer abundance filtering by using minimum kmer count 2 and kmer length 45 with the mixed datasets. None of the defined community members have all kmers present in the count 2 graph. Xander assembled 23 unique contigs. There were 17 clusters with three representatives identified as chimeras. Compared to the count 1 graph, the contig matching S. epidermidis was 102 bases shorter, whereas the contig matching S. aureus was full length and 210 bases longer than the one assembled by using the count 1 graph. One contig from the count 1 graph matched D. radiodurans, but none from the count 2 graph matched. The rest of the contigs were actually closer to rplB reference sequences not present in the defined community. The average length of the assembled contigs was very similar between the count 1 and count 2 graphs.

When searching the best 1000 paths using the same starting kmer of length 45 used in the defined community reads alone, Xander assembled the same set of contigs as those using the defined community reads alone.

Comparison to the gene-targeted SAT-Assembler

When we tested the SAT-Assembler on the HMP-defined community data, SAT assembled 798 rplB contigs averaging 96 bp in length. Only four unique nucleotide rplB contigs were longer than the 450-bp cutoff used with Xander (see Additional file 1). These four contigs shared a median 97.8 % nucleotide identity to three defined community members (Table 2). Two of the contigs (588 and 512 bp) were chimeric, the remaining two (533 and 559 bp) shared 99.6 and 99.8 % nucleotide identity to Bacteroides vulgatus, respectively. All four contigs were missing both ends of the genes. Using prune 20 and kmer length of 45, Xander assembled six full- or near full-length (median coverage 94.6 %) contigs matching four defined community members with a median 99.8 % nucleotide identity to the closest references. At kmer length of 45, Xander did not assemble contigs matching B. vulgatus. At kmer length of 30, Xander assembled a B. vulgatus contig of length 681 bp with one mismatch.

Table 2 Comparison between Xander and SAT assembly of ribosomal protein L2 (rplB) genes from HMP-defined community data
Full size table

We also attempted to assemble HMP community member rplB genes from the mixed HMP and corn rhizosphere sample 1 data. SAT assembled 1353 contigs before clustering with length longer than 450 bp (median length 594 bp). Only three contigs shared more than 90 % identity with any defined community member. Two of these contigs of lengths 808 and 816 bp were near identical and appear to be chimeras between B. vulgatus on the 5′ end and an unknown organism for the last 190 bases of the 3′ end. A third short contig of 490 bp appears also to be chimeric, with the 5′ 350 bp 99 % identical to the corresponding region of the D. radiodurans sequence, and the final 140 bp only 67 % identical to D. radiodurans. In all three cases, we were unable to identify the other parent.

Bulk assembly of pooled rhizosphere soil data

There were fewer than 50 nirK representatives found from each of the replicate samples pooled by crops, with sizes of 233 to 293 Gbp (Table 3). None of the nirK contigs were close to full length and shared only a median of 73.3 to 79.6 % aa identity with reference sequences. Corn samples showed slightly higher species richness (37 OTUs at 90 % aa identity) than the 30 in switchgrass and Miscanthus samples. There are 125 rplB clusters (420 reads mapped) found in corn, 166 clusters (487 reads mapped) in Miscanthus, and 146 clusters (354 reads mapped) in switchgrass samples. The estimated nirK gene abundances were between 25 and 30 %. More than half the nirK and rplB contigs had only median reads coverage of one or two (data not shown). Only two partial-length nifH genes were found in corn, three from Miscanthus, and one from switchgrass samples.

Table 3 Nitrite reductase (nirK) genes found in bulk assembly of pooled rhizosphere samples
Full size table

Xander assembly of pooled rhizosphere soil data

Since the longer kmer and pruning performed better based on the results using the HMP-defined community data, a kmer length of 45 and prune 20 was used throughout the analyses described below. To be comparable with the bulk metagenomic assemblies, we used the same three pooled samples and used Xander to assemble nirK, nifH, and rplB genes in a single path search. Xander assembled at least 40 times more nirK contig clusters (Table 4) than the ones found by metagenomic assembly. The median length of these nirK contigs was 80 aa longer than the median length found in metagenomic assembly. They shared a median of 84.7 to 88.3 % aa identity with the references, higher than 73.3 to 79.6 % aa identity for the metagenomic assembly. Corn samples showed slightly higher species richness (413 OTUs at 90 % aa identity) than 358 in switchgrass and 317 in Miscanthus samples. The number of rplB contigs assembled was similar among the three crops. The majority of rplB contigs were near full length with a median length of 274 aa (compared to the average length of 280 aa for the reference sequences). Very few nifH genes were assembled.

Table 4 Xander assembly of pooled rhizosphere samples
Full size table

We examined the kmer abundance and mean kmer coverage for each representative nirK and rplB contigs. More than half the kmers in the three samples occurred only once or twice. The corn sample had more high-coverage kmers than Miscanthus or switchgrass (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The corn sample also had more contigs with higher mean coverage than Miscanthus and switchgrass (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Using the pooled samples, we estimated about 10 % of the organisms had nirK genes in these soil samples and only about 1 in 200 to 300 had nifH genes. These estimates were very similar between the three crops, and close to those obtained from one sample alone, but lower than those estimated by the bulk assembly (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Kmer abundance of nitrite reductase gene (nirK) representative contigs assembled by Xander from the pooled rhizosphere samples. The representative contigs were chosen from clusters at 99 % aa identity. X-axis indicates the number of times (abundance) a kmer in the contigs occurred in the reads. Y-axis represents the fraction of total unique kmers with this abundance

Full size image

Among the pooled samples, about 15 % of the nirK contigs were the closest match to rplB from Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110. We explored searching 1000 best paths from the pooled corn samples using one 3′ end starting nirK kmer from B. japonicum USDA 110. Xander returned 979 unique near full-length nucleotide contigs that formed 159 clusters at 99 % aa identity. The 159 cluster representatives shared 80.5 to 94.8 % aa identity with B. japonicum USDA 110 and four other Bradyrhizobium species. The contig sharing the highest percent aa identity with B. japonicum USDA 110 was not the best path but the 247th best path, with a very similar HMM score to the best path (1066.75 vs 1069.65).

Xander assembly of individual rhizosphere soil samples

Using a 33-GB de Bruijn graph built for each of the 21 samples, Xander assembled, on average, 327 nirK contig clusters, with median length of 200 aa and median percent aa identity of 89.7 % to known nirK genes (Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4, and S5). Xander assembled 3957 rplB contig clusters with a median length of 266 aa (recall the average length of rplB references is 280 aa). Even though only a few nifH contigs were assembled for each sample, the median percent aa identity to known nifH genes is 94.8 %. Using kmer coverage to calculate the relative abundance, we estimated about 10 % organisms have nirK genes in these 21 soil samples (Additional file 1: Tables S3, S4, and S5). The average abundances of nifH genes in corn, switchgrass, and Miscanthus are 0.11, 0.22, and 0.24 %, respectively.

We used PCA to visualize the community structures among the 21 rhizosphere samples using either nirK or rplB representative contigs. The nifH contigs were not used due to the low number of contigs assembled. Both PCA plots showed that corn samples are distinct from the switchgrass and Miscanthus samples (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Principal component analysis of rhizosphere samples (n = 7 per crop). The OTU abundances at 95 % aa identity were corrected using the mean kmer coverage of each contig. The OTU data were then standardized using the Wisconsin square root normalization as implemented in R. Ellipses represent 1 standard deviation of the points from the centroid. C corn, M Miscanthus, S switchgrass. Left: nitrite reductase (nirK). Right: ribosomal protein L2 (rplB)

Full size image

Xander performance

The Xander program contains three main steps. The graph-building step is single-threaded in our current implementation. The step to find starting kmers can be done in multiple threads and is easily parallelizable. Once the starting kmers are identified, the assembly of multiple genes can run in parallel. We choose three datasets with different data sizes to illustrate the memory usage and running time (Table 5). For example, the rhizosphere sample C1 required 60-GB memory and completed within 20 h on MSU’s HPCC using a single CPU. When tested on HPCC, the HMP-defined community data assembled in 25 min, while on an iMac with 3.2-GHz Intel Core i5 processor, it took 5 min, both single-threaded. Speed is expected to be faster when files are stored on a local drive.

Table 5 Xander processing statistics with kmer length of 45 and count 1
Full size table

Discussion

Xander uses a novel data structure combining de Bruijn graphs and HMMs to target assembly of important genes from metagenomic data. Using this data structure allows us to apply powerful graph search techniques to assemble individual genes. The HMM-guided assembly reduces the search space and provides gene annotation. Additional optimizations including caching of best paths from previous searches and heuristic search pruning provide several orders of magnitude of speedup over a naïve approach. Xander requires reference sequences from the targeted gene families for HMM training and start finding and is not meant for discovering completely novel gene families. Although we applied this method to soil rhizosphere metagenomic data, this method should also be applicable to de novo assembly of transcriptome and metatranscriptome data.

We targeted three gene families: rplB, a single-copy core phylogenetic marker gene; nifH, a marker for nitrogen fixation; and nirK, a marker for denitrification. There is considerable interest in using biofuel crops as one way to mitigate global warming. One factor in improving lower cost biofuel crop production on non-food-producing lands is to improve plant-available nitrogen. The Kellogg Biological Station has replicate field plots of corn, a traditionally farmed annual biofuel crop, and two perennial biofuel crops, an exotic, Miscanthus, and a native, switchgrass. We used Xander to assemble the three genes from the pooled rhizosphere samples from each crop. Roughly 17,000 to 20,000 rplB genes assembled for each sample (Table 4). We found about 10 % as many nirK contig clusters and even fewer nifH contig clusters. A previous study at other Midwest sites found higher gene richness in nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ), another marker gene for denitrification, in corn soil communities than in switchgrass and Miscanthus soil communities [36], as did we for nirK. They also found lower abundance of nifH compared to nosZ in all soils, matching our findings. When compared to the available bulk metagenomic assembly using the diginorm/partitioning assembly pipeline used in several recent published works [12, 27], only 125 to 146 rplB gene clusters were found in the available bulk metagenomic assembly (Table 3). In general, Xander assembled 10- to 100-fold more contig clusters for these three genes. The contigs, assembled by Xander, were longer in length and shared higher percent aa identity with known reference sequences.

In ordination analysis, these samples were grouped by crop, with corn being more distinct from the two perennial crops. This is consistent with 16S rRNA amplicon data and whole metagenomic analysis using the same samples that showed corn communities differed from those of perennial crops (Jiarong Guo, personal communication).

Using the closest matching rplB reference sequences, five phyla were present at 5 % or more of the total: Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The distribution is similar to 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data [37] with the exception of the Acidobacteria, a typical major soil phylum. The reference set available for rplB is much smaller than those available for rRNA genes, and for some groups of common soil organisms there are few available reference sequences. This is especially true for the Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia where there are few cultured representatives. For the Acidobacteria, there are at least 26 subgroups roughly equivalent to classes [38], yet there are only 8 genome sequences, hence rplB sequences, available and from only 3 of these class-level subgroups. This affects the outcome of Xander at several steps: our HMM model may be biased against sequences with no relatives in the training set; if available references do not share any peptide of, in this case, 15 aa with an unknown, we will fail to identify an appropriate starting kmer; and assembled contigs may be misclassified if there are no related references available. Targeted genome sequencing efforts and single-cell sequencing have been filling in some gaps [39, 40], so this may become less of an issue.

About 10 % of bacteria were estimated to carry the nirK gene for the 21 samples (Table 4), similar to the qPCR estimates of 6 % nirK genes per rRNA gene (a multi-copy gene) in agricultural soil [41]. The nirK gene contigs, as expected, were dominated by matches in the Proteobacteria. However, when extrapolating from nearest gene match to taxonomic affiliation, it is important to keep in mind that some horizontal transfer of nirK has been detected [42]. One reference, B. japonicum USDA 110 (BAC52354), was the most abundant match in all three crop systems. These contigs averaged 91 % aa identity with a maximum of 98.4 % aa identity to the reference. Intriguingly, in bulk soil from Illinois sites growing the same three cropping systems, this same strain was found as having the best match to PCR amplicons targeting nosZ, encoding the terminal step in the denitrification pathway, although these matches were not as abundant [43]. This strain was widely used in soybean inoculants sold throughout the U.S. Midwest.

The HMP-defined community metagenomic data proved to be a good test set for validating Xander. While the community contains members from diverse taxonomic groups, several members are closely related and shared kmers of lengths 30 to 60 in their rplB genes, creating complexity in the graph structure. The overlap between the rplB gene sequences in the community combined with sequencing errors lead to small differences in the assembled sequences. The dataset was also challenging because of the low sequencing depth and regions of zero coverage of many members. Unfortunately, none of the members have nirK genes. Two members have nifH genes, but only one had all kmers of length 30 in the data.

We consider accuracy more important than longer and more contigs when assessing the assembler quality. For the defined community, we can measure the accuracy using the sequence identity of the recovered sequences to the known member sequences. The kmer length is an important factor in determining accuracy. A kmer length of 30 resulted in a high percentage of chimeric contig clusters. A kmer length of 45 assembled contig clusters with fewer mismatches and no chimeras but ended up with shorter contigs due to more regions with zero coverage. None of the rplB sequences from the defined community member are covered by kmers of length 60. For this dataset, length 45 appears to be a good choice to balance the trade-off between length and accuracy. We compared the performance of Xander to SAT-Assembler, another recently published gene-targeted assembly tool. Xander produced more and longer contigs with higher identity for more defined community members using a small dataset (Table 2). In experiments mixing the HMP community data with the corn 1 sample, SAT-Assembler did not return any non-chimeric contigs greater than 450 bp and with greater than 90 % identity to community member rplB genes. In contrast, Xander returned contigs corresponding to three community members.

Chimeras appeared to be a much smaller problem for contigs assembled from the rhizosphere soil data. Bulk assemblers attempt to avoid chimeras during assembly, often by terminating contigs where paths fork. In contrast, Xander relies on appropriate kmer size to reduce chimeras and post-processing to discard chimeric assemblies. On the HMP community data, UCHIME was very accurate and detected all chimeras found. We confirmed these results from UCHIME by manually validating all the contigs. It seems likely that because of the higher diversity, and potentially competitive exclusion, fewer sequences in the rhizosphere data share kmers of length 45.

Because Xander scores paths at the aa level, sequencing errors that translate into less likely amino acids for a given position will not be incorporated into a best path if an error-free read covering the same position exists; however, sequencing errors resulting in synonymous codons or resulting in more likely amino acids may be incorporated. Requiring a kmer count of 2 removed most sequencing errors and had the additional advantage of reducing the number of vertices searched by Xander. The latter is at least partially due to a reduction of starting kmers found in the graph (Table 1). For low-coverage datasets such as these, a minimum count of 2 decreased the length and number of contigs returned. For example, in sample C1, all five high-quality contigs (full-length and sharing 99 to 100 % aa identity with references) have multiple kmers of abundance 1 and so cannot be assembled with count 2. More than 35 % of the kmers in the Xander-assembled nirK and rplB contigs occurred only once in the reads (Fig. 3), while more than 40 % of nirK and rplB contigs identified in bulk assembly had median read coverage of 1 (data not shown). Xander worked well without discarding the reads with low abundance or partitioning the dataset. Such techniques are commonly employed by bulk assemblers but usually cause information loss [4].

When the search reaches a zero coverage region, meaning the gene is not complete, Xander will try to explore all available paths. It will eventually find the least bad path even though it is not related to the target gene. We used a heuristic algorithm to prune non-productive paths that reduces search space by at least tenfold with essentially identical results. This is a very simple heuristic that prunes paths that have not improved the overall path score within the user-specified number of steps. This works well for these target genes, but a more sophisticated heuristic might reduce the search space even further.

To save memory, Xander uses a Bloom filter for the in-memory representation of the de Bruijn graph [12] but is not dependent on this particular de Bruijn representation. In particular, a succinct de Bruijn graph representation has been used in some new assemblers such as MEGAHIT [44] to reduce space. Such a structure could be adopted in Xander to achieve additional space savings. Since only specific genes are targeted, pre-screening of reads could be used before the de Bruijn graph assembly to reduce space requirements even further. For example, SALT can filter out most non-target reads with minimal loss of target-gene reads by using read overlap information determined by scanning the reads through a set of relaxed HMM models [45]. Most bulk assemblers implement heuristics [46] to reduce the search space and remove errors and these could potentially be incorporated into Xander.

Conclusions

An HMM-guided assembly using Xander combines gene assignment and assembly and allows rapid analysis of functional genes in metagenomic datasets without requiring bulk assembly or post-processing assembled data to find genes of interest. Compared to a whole metagenomic assembly where the three target genes were rarely detected, Xander assembled more contigs that were longer in length and shared higher amino acid identity with known reference sequences. Analysis of the assembly output demonstrated its ability to detect low-abundance genes and genes from low-abundance organisms, suggesting Xander can be a powerful tool to study the composition and diversity of microbial communities. HMMs used for assembly can be tailored to the targeted genes, allowing flexibility to improve annotation over generic annotation pipelines, while the ability to find multiple best paths provides Xander the potential to explore strain-level (ecotype) variation.

Availability and requirements

Project name: Xander

Project home page: https://github.com/rdpstaff/Xander_assembler

Operating system(s): Platform independent

Programming language: Java [47]

Other requirements: Java 1.6 or above

License: GNU GPLv3

Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None

Abbreviations

CAG:

combined weighted assembly graph

DG:

de Bruijn graph

GB:

gigabytes

Gbp:

giga base pairs

HMM:

hidden Markov model

kmer:

substring of length k

Mbp:

million base pairs

nifH :

nitrogenase reductase gene

nirK :

nitrite reductase gene

OTU:

operational taxonomic unit

PCA:

principal component analysis

rplB :

ribosomal protein L2 gene

References

  1. 1.

    Pop M, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL. Comparative genome assembly. Brief Bioinform. 2004;5:237–48. doi:10.1093/bib/5.3.237.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL. Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:36–46. doi:10.1038/nrg3117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science. 2004;304:66–74. doi:10.1126/science.1093857.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi:10.1038/nature08821.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Namiki T, Hachiya T, Tanaka H, Sakakibara Y. MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e155. doi:10.1093/nar/gks678.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kunin V, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P. A bioinformatician’s guide to metagenomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72(4):557–78. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00009-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    de Bruijn NG, Erdos P. A combinatorial problem. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie v. Wetenschappen. 1946;49:758–64. http://www.dwc.knaw.nl/DL/publications/PU00018235.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  8. 8.

    Compeau PE, Pevzner PA, Tesler G. How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:987–91. doi:10.1038/nbt.2023.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Eddy SR. What is a hidden Markov model? Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1315–6. doi:10.1038/nbt1004-1315.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bloom BH. Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors. Commun ACM. 1970;13:422–6. doi:10.1145/362686.362692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Manber U, Wu S. An algorithm for approximate membership checking with application to password security. Inform Process Lett. 1994;50(4):191–7. doi: 10.1016/0020-0190(94)00032-8.

  12. 12.

    Pell J, Hintze A, Canino-Koning R, Howe A, Tiedje JM, Brown CT. Scaling metagenome sequence assembly with probabilistic de Bruijn graphs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13272–7. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121464109.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Miller CS, Baker BJ, Thomas BC, Singer SW, Banfield JF. EMIRGE: reconstruction of full-length ribosomal genes from microbial community short read sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R44. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r44.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chevreux B, Pfisterer T, Drescher B, Driesel AJ, Müller WE, Wetter T, et al. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res. 2004;14:1147–59. doi:10.1101/gr.1917404.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang Y, Sun Y, Cole JR. A Scalable and Accurate Targeted gene Assembly tool (SAT-Assembler) for next-generation sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biology. 2014;10(8), e1003737. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    IDBA-Hybrid: an iterative De Bruijn Graph De Novo Assembler for hybrid sequencing. https://code.google.com/p/hku-idba/downloads/detail?name=idba_hybrid-1.0.12.tar.gz. Accessed 15 Jul 2015.

  17. 17.

    Holley G, Peterlongo P. BlastGraph: intensive approximate pattern matching in string graphs and de-Bruijn graphs. In PSC 2012, Prague, Czech Republic. http://hal.inria.fr/hal-00711911. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  18. 18.

    Xue Q, Cole JR, Pramanik S. Sequence homology search based on database indexing using the profile hidden Markov model. Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE’06). 2006;pp 135–40.

  19. 19.

    Hart P, Nilsson N, Raphael B. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE T Syst Sci Cyb. 1968;4:100–7. doi:10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yen JY. Finding the K shortest loopless paths in a network. Management Sci. 1971;17:712–6. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2629312. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  21. 21.

    Lawler EL. A procedure for computing the K best solutions to discrete optimization problems and its application to the shortest path problem. Management Sci. 1972;18:401–5. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2629357. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  22. 22.

    Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland. ftp://ftp.cbcb.umd.edu/pub/data/metagenomics/HMP. Accessed 23 Jan 2015.

  23. 23.

    Fish JA, Chai B, Wang Q, Sun Y, Brown CT, Tiedje JM, et al. FunGene: the functional gene pipeline and repository. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:291. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00291.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kellog Biological Station. http://www.kbs.msu.edu. Accessed 23 Jan 2015.

  25. 25.

    JGI Genome Portal. http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  26. 26.

    MG-RAST. http://metagenomics.anl.gov/. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  27. 27.

    Howe AC, Jansson JK, Malfatti SA, Tringe SG, Tiedje JM, Brown CT. Tackling soil diversity with the assembly of large, complex metagenomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:4904–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402564111.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 2009;23:205–11. http://www.jsbi.org/pdfs/journal1/GIW09/GIW09I01.pdf Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  29. 29.

    Johnson S. Remote protein homology detection using Hidden Markov Models. PhD thesis, Washington University 2006. http://selab.janelia.org/publications/Johnson06/Johnson06-phdthesis.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2015.

  30. 30.

    Wang Q, Quensen JF, Fish JA, Lee TK, Sun Y, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Ecological patterns of nifH genes in four terrestrial climatic zones explored with targeted metagenomics using FrameBot, a new informatics tool. mBio. 2013;4:e00592-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00592-13.

  31. 31.

    Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–200. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–63. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rho M, Tang H, Ye Y. FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38, e191. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq747.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    HPCC. https://icer.msu.edu/hpcc. Accessed 11 May 2015.

  36. 36.

    Mao Y, Yannarell AC, Mackie RI. Changes in N-transforming archaea and bacteria in soil during the establishment of bioenergy crops. PLoS One. 2011;6(9), e24750. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024750.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Janssen PH. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(3):1719–28.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Barns SM, Cain EC, Sommerville L, Kuske CR. Acidobacteria phylum sequences in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments greatly expand the known diversity within the phylum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(9):3113–6.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2009;462:1056–60.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Blainey PC. The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37(3):407–27. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12015.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Henry S, Bru D, Stres B, Hallet S, Philippot L. Quantitative detection of the nosZ gene, encoding nitrous oxide reductase, and comparison of the abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(8):5181–89. doi:10.1128/AEM.00231-06.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Heylen K, Gevers D, Vanparys B, Wittebolle L, Geets J, Boon N, et al. The incidence of nirS and nirK and their genetic heterogeneity in cultivated denitrifies. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8(11):2012–21. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01081.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mao Y, Yannarell AC, Davis SC, Mackie RI. Impact of different bioenergy crops on N-cycling bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:928–42. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02844.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033

  45. 45.

    Zhang Y, Sun Y, Cole JR. A Sensitive and Accurate protein domain cLassification Tool (SALT) for short reads. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2103–11. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt357.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9. doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Java. http://www.java.com. Assessed 15 Jul 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jiarong Guo for providing his unpublished bulk assembly data. We thank Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research at Michigan State University and especially Matthew Scholz for supplying computational resource. We thank Donna McGarrell and Stella Zeng for proofreading the manuscript.

Primary funding for this work came from the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center via DOE Office of Science [BER DE-FC02-07ER64494] with contributions from [DE-FG02-99ER62848 and DE-SC0010715], the U. S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program [5P42ES004911-23], and the National Science Foundation [DBI-1356380].

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

      Qiong Wang, Jordan A. Fish, James M. Tiedje & James R. Cole

    2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

      Jordan A. Fish, Mariah Gilman, Yanni Sun & C. Titus Brown

    3. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

      C. Titus Brown & James M. Tiedje

    4. Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

      James M. Tiedje & James R. Cole

    Authors
    1. Qiong Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Jordan A. Fish
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Mariah Gilman
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yanni Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. C. Titus Brown
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. James M. Tiedje
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. James R. Cole
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to James R. Cole.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    JAF, QW, and JRC designed the algorithm and wrote the manuscript. JAF, QW, JRC, and MG developed the software. QW and JRC performed the software testing and data analysis. JAF and MG participated in testing using HMP-defined community data. JMT, YS, and CTB contributed to the discussions on algorithms and data analysis and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Qiong Wang and Jordan A. Fish contributed equally to this work.

    Additional file

    Additional file 1:

    Supplemental materials and tables about the HMP-defined community data, rhizosphere metagenomic datasets, and assembly summary results.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Wang, Q., Fish, J.A., Gilman, M. et al. Xander: employing a novel method for efficient gene-targeted metagenomic assembly. Microbiome 3, 32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0093-6

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Metagenomics
    • Assembly
    • Functional gene
    • HMM
    • Nitrogen cycle
    • nifH
    • nirK
    • Biofuel crop

    Microbiome

    ISSN: 2049-2618

    Contact us