Skip to main content

Gut microbiome signatures linked to HIV-1 reservoir size and viremia control

Abstract

Background

The potential role of the gut microbiome as a predictor of immune-mediated HIV-1 control in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is still unknown. In the BCN02 clinical trial, which combined the MVA.HIVconsv immunogen with the latency-reversing agent romidepsin in early-ART treated HIV-1 infected individuals, 23% (3/13) of participants showed sustained low-levels of plasma viremia during 32 weeks of a monitored ART pause (MAP). Here, we present a multi-omics analysis to identify compositional and functional gut microbiome patterns associated with HIV-1 control in the BCN02 trial.

Results

Viremic controllers during the MAP (controllers) exhibited higher Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio and lower microbial gene richness before vaccination and throughout the study intervention when compared to non-controllers. Longitudinal assessment indicated that the gut microbiome of controllers was enriched in pro-inflammatory bacteria and depleted in butyrate-producing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Functional profiling also showed that metabolic pathways related to fatty acid and lipid biosynthesis were significantly increased in controllers. Fecal metaproteome analyses confirmed that baseline functional differences were mainly driven by Clostridiales. Participants with high baseline Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio had increased pre-existing immune activation-related transcripts. The Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio as well as host immune-activation signatures inversely correlated with HIV-1 reservoir size.

Conclusions

The present proof-of-concept study suggests the Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio as a novel gut microbiome signature associated with HIV-1 reservoir size and immune-mediated viral control after ART interruption.

Video abstract

Background

A major obstacle to HIV-1 cure is the persistence of viral reservoirs. This mainly refers to latently infected cells carrying transcriptionally silent, replication-competent viruses which evade antiretroviral therapy (ART) as well as immune-mediated clearance [1,2,3]. The immune system is generally unable to contain HIV-1 replication in the absence of ART [4]. However, up to 10–20% of subjects that initiate ART within first weeks after HIV-1 acquisition may temporarily achieve HIV-1 viremia suppression after ART interruption (ATI) [5]. Understanding the mechanisms behind immune-mediated viremia control after ATI is key to progress towards a functional HIV cure. Broader and higher-magnitude CTL (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte) responses against less diverse HIV-1 epitopes [6, 7] in the context of favorable HLA class I genotypes [8] and smaller HIV-1 reservoir size [9] have all been related to such post-treatment HIV-1 control.

There is indirect evidence that the gut microbiome might also contribute to immune-mediated control of HIV-1 replication [10, 11]. Vaccine-induced gut microbiome alterations, consisting in lower bacterial diversity and negative correlation between richness and CD14+DR- monocytes in colorectal intraepithelial lymphocytes, have been recently associated with HIV/SIV (SHIV) protection in a non-human primate challenge study after mucosal vaccination with HIV/SIV peptides, modified vaccinia Ankara–SIV and HIV-gp120–CD4 fusion protein plus adjuvants through the oral route [12]. In the HVTN 096 trial [13], where the impact of the gut microbiota on HIV-specific immune response to a DNA-prime, poxvirus-boost strategy in human adults was assessed, baseline and vaccine-induced gp41-reactive IgG titers were associated with different microbiota community structures, in terms of richness and composition [14]. In particular, co-occurring bacterial groups, such as Ruminococcaceae, Peptoniphilaceae, and Bacteroidaceae, were associated with vaccine-induced IgG response and inversely correlated with pre-existing gp41 binding IgG antibodies, suggesting that the microbiome may influence the immune response and vaccine immunogenicity [14]. Also, another study evidence has shown that HIV vaccine-induced CD4+ T and B cell responses could be imprinted by prior exposure to cross-reactive intestinal microbiota-derived antigens [15]. Further evidence emerged from other studies in typhoid Ty21 [16], rotavirus [17] and oral polio virus, tetanus-toxoid, bacillus Calmette-Guérin, and hepatitis B immunization strategies [18], in which specific gut microbiome signatures (Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus bovis, and Clostridiales, respectively) positively correlated with vaccine-induced immune response. In the absence of immune correlates of viral control, HIV cure trials usually incorporate an ART interruption phase to address the efficacy of a therapeutic intervention [19]. Data on the role of gut microbiome composition in the responsiveness to a curative strategy and the relationship with viral control after ART interruption are lacking. The BCN02 study [20] was a single-arm, proof-of-concept “kick and kill” clinical trial evaluating the safety and the in vivo effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin given as a latency reversing agent [21] in combination with a therapeutic HIV vaccine (MVA.HIVconsv) in a group of early-ART treated HIV-1-infected individuals [22, 23]. During a monitored ART interruption (MAP), 23% of individuals showed sustained viremia control up to 32 weeks of follow-up.

Here, we aimed to identify salient compositional and functional gut microbiome patterns associated with control of HIV-1 viremia after ART interruption in the “kick and kill” strategy used in the BCN02 study.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a sub-study derived from the BCN02 clinical trial (NCT02616874). The BCN02 was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase I, proof-of-concept clinical trial in which 15 HIV-1-infected individuals with sustained viral suppression who started ART within the first 6 months after HIV transmission were enrolled to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and effect on the viral reservoir of a kick and kill strategy consisting of the combination of HIVconsv vaccines with romidepsin, given as a latency reversing agent (LRA) [20] (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a). Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), developed as an anti-cancer drug, which has been shown to induce HIV-1 transcription both in vitro and in vivo [21, 24]. The HIVconsv immunogen was constructed by assembling 14 highly conserved regions derived from HIV-1 genes Gag, Pol, Vif, and Env alternating, for each domain, the consensus sequence of the four major HIV-1 clades A, B, C, and D and delivered by non-replicating poxvirus MVA vector [20]. Fifteen individuals enrolled in the BCN02 trial (procedures for recruitment and eligibility criteria are detailed elsewhere [20]) were immunized with a first dose of MVA.HIVconsv (MVA1, 2 × 108 pfu intramuscularly), followed by three weekly-doses of romidepsin (RMD1-2-3, 5 mg/m2 BSA intravenously) and a second boost of MVA.HIVconsv (MVA2, 2 × 108 pfu intramuscularly) 4 weeks after the last RMD3 infusion. To assess the ability for viral control after ART interruption, participants underwent a monitored antiviral pause (MAP), 8 weeks after the second vaccination (MVA2), for a maximum of 32 weeks or until any ART resumption criteria were met (plasma viral load > 2000 copies/ml, CD4+ cell counts < 500 cells/mm3 and/or development of clinical symptoms related to an acute retroviral syndrome [20]). The study was conducted between February 2016 and October 2017 at two HIV-1 units from university hospitals in Barcelona (Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol and Hospital Clínic) and a community center (BCN-Checkpoint, Barcelona). The microbiome sub-study concept, design, and patient information were reviewed and approved by the institutional ethical review board of the participating institutions (Reference Nr AC-15-108-R) and by the Spanish Regulatory Authorities (EudraCT 2015-002300-84). Written informed consent was provided by all study participants in accordance to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and local personal data protection law (LOPD 15/1999).

Sample disposition and data analysis

Fourteen participants from the BCN02 trial consented to participate in the BCN02-microbiome study, 1 was excluded due to a protocol violation during MAP, and 13 were included for multi-omics analyses. Twelve from the thirteen participants that finalized the “kick and kill” intervention completed the MAP phase (n = 3 controllers and n = 9 non-controllers) and one subject (B07) did not enter the MAP period due to immune futility pre-defined criteria and absence of protective HLA class I protective alleles associated with natural HIV-1 control (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). Based on the gut microbiome similarity with non-controllers at study entry and over the “kick and kill” intervention, the participant B07 was included in the non-controller arm to increase the statistical power in this microbiome sub-study. Fecal specimens were longitudinally collected at BCN02 during the intervention period at study entry (pre-Vax), 1 week after 1st vaccination (MVA1), 1 week after RMD3 (RMD) and 4 weeks after 2nd vaccination (MVA2). Samples were also collected over the MAP period (from 4 to 34 weeks after ART interruption) and 24 weeks after ART resumption (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a). All samples were processed for shotgun metagenomics analysis. Taxonomical classification, microbial gene content and functional profiling were inferred using Metaphlan2 [25], IGC reference catalog [26], and HUMAnN2 [27], respectively. Sequencing analysis and quality control of metagenomics data are provided in the Additional file 1: Supplementary results. To facilitate the interpretation, longitudinal time points were schematically grouped into three phases (Additional file 1: Fig. S2a). Fecal material, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and plasma samples were also sampled at baseline to assess fecal metaproteome, host transcriptome profiles and soluble inflammation biomarkers, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S2b). Microbial proteins from fecal samples were measured by mass spectrometry and protein identification performed using Mascot search engine (v2.4, Matrix Science) and Scaffold Q+ software (v4.9.0, Proteome Software) [28]. PBMC transcriptomes were evaluated using RNA-sequencing and sequence reads aligned to the human reference genome by STAR v2.5.3a [29]. Read counts estimation was inferred using RSEM v1.3.0 [30] and differential expression analysis performed by DESeq2 [31]. Plasma proteins were estimated using the Proximity Extension Assay based on the Olink Inflammation Panel [32]. Correlations between ‘omic’ datasets were computed using Spearman's correlation coefficients and integrative multi-omics analysis was assessed based on the mixOmics R package [33]. A detailed description of wet-lab procedures, bioinformatic methods and statistical analysis of metagenome, metaproteome, transcriptome, soluble plasma markers and multi-omics data is available in the Additional file 1: Supplementary methods.

Results

Patient characteristics

In this microbiome sub-study, we evaluated 13 participants of the BCN02 study. Three had sustained low-level HIV plasma viremia (< 2000 copies/ml) during 32 weeks of MAP (viremic controllers), whereas 9 developed HIV-1 RNA rebound (> 2000 copies/ml) during MAP (non-controllers). One additional subject (B07) did not qualify for MAP due to pre-specified immune futility criteria and absence of protective HLA alleles, and therefore, was also considered a non-controller in this microbiome study. (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). Study participants were predominantly MSM (92%) of Caucasian ethnicity (92%), with median age of 42 years and median body mass index of 22.9 kg/m2 (Table 1). Median baseline CD4+ T cell counts was 728 (416–1408) cells/mm3 and median CD4/CD8 T cell ratio was 1.4 (0.97–1.9). All subjects had been on integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-based triple ART for >3 years, begun during the first 3 months after HIV-1 infection. Median baseline HIV-1 proviral DNA was 140 copies/106 CD4+ T cells, being numerically lower in controllers than in non-controllers (65 vs 165 copies/106 CD4+ T cells, p = 0.29).

Table 1 Study participant demographics and clinical characteristics

Baseline gut-associated Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio and lower microbial gene richness discriminate between viremic controllers and non-controllers

Viremic controllers had significantly higher Bacteroidales levels than non-controllers at study entry (pre-Vax p = 0.007) and during all the intervention phase (MVA1 p = 0.049, RMD p = 0.049 and MVA2, p = 0.014) (Fig. 1a) as well as lower baseline Clostridiales abundance (p = 0.014) (Fig. 1b). Accordingly, the Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio remained significantly higher in controllers at study entry and throughout the intervention (pre-Vax p = 0.007 and MVA2, p = 0.028) (Fig. 1c). Also, controllers were significantly depleted in archaeal members from the methanogenic order Methanobacteriales (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). More detailed analyses at lower taxonomic level within the orders Bacteroidales and Clostridiales showed that controllers were mainly depleted in Clostridiales species, such as Eubacterium spp. and Subdoligranulum spp., whereas the Bacteroidales species Prevotella copri was significantly higher after the three romidepsin doses (Additional file 1: Fig. S5), being such trends maintained throughout the intervention (Additional file 1: Figs. S5 and S6). Viremic controllers also had lower microbial gene richness than non-controllers at the study entry (p = 0.028) and MVA1 (p = 0.049), although such differences lost statistical significance in the RMD and MVA2 assessments (Fig. 2a). Alpha diversity also remained numerically lower in controllers, but differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2b). Controllers exhibited lower beta-diversity, particularly already at the study entry (p = 0.004; Additional file 1: Fig. S7), and showed less intra-host longitudinal evolution than non-controllers (p = 0.001) (Fig. 2c). Whereas the gut microbiome composition of controllers was significantly different from that of non-controllers (p = 0.001), no significant longitudinal differences were observed across time points (p = 0.815), suggesting that the combined intervention did not significantly alter the gut-microbiome composition (Fig. 2c). Of note, results did not change after removing B07 from the non-controller arm (Additional file 1: Fig. S8). No differences in Bacteroidales and Clostridiales abundances and microbial diversity were observed during MAP and after ART re-initiation (Additional file 1: Supplementary results). Furthermore, longitudinal profiling of metabolic pathways associated with Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, and archaea showed that controllers were mainly enriched in functions related to fatty acid biosynthesis, whereas functions related to methanogenesis and carbohydrate biosynthesis were overrepresented in non-controllers (Additional file 1: Supplementary results and Figs. S9–S12). Taken together, these data showed that differences between controllers and non-controllers mainly emerged from resident microbial communities, before any intervention was started in BCN02 study. Thus, subsequent analyses were focused on characterizing further discriminant signatures at study entry.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Higher longitudinal Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio in viremic controllers. Relative abundance expressed as percentage of Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, and c their ratio in controllers (gray) and non-controllers (white) are represented by boxplots (left and right vertical panels) and line plots (middle vertical panels). In line plots, values for each subject are illustrated by white squares (non-controllers) and grey dots (viremic controllers). Boxplots show the median (horizontal black line) and interquartile range between the first and third quartiles (25th and 75th, respectively). Third vertical panels show non-controllers before ART interruption (pre-MAP, n = 7), last time point on MAP before ART resumption (last detect pVL, n = 4) and 24 weeks after ART resumption (post-MAP w4, n = 7). Abbreviations: MAP, monitored antiretroviral pause; pre-Vax, baseline (1 day before first MVA vaccination); MVA1, 1 week after first MVA vaccination; RMD, 1 week after third romidepsin infusion; MVA2, 4 weeks after second MVA vaccination. Unadjusted p values are shown. Benjamini–Hochberg multiple hypothesis correction for p values ≤ 0.05 are provided in Additional file 2: Dataset S7.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lower microbial diversity and richness in controllers. Longitudinal a microbial gene richness at 10 million (10 M filtered reads) down-sampling size and b alpha diversity based on Shannon index in viremic controllers (gray) and non-controllers (white). c Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of microbial diversity based on Bray-Curtis distances at pre-vaccination and during ‘kick and kill’ intervention. Proportion of variance explained by each principal coordinate axis is reported in the corresponding axis label. Subjects per each group are represented by squares (controllers) and circles (non-controllers). Each point stands for one subject, color coded by group and time point. The increase in purple (controllers) and blue (non-controllers) colors reflects sequential time points from baseline (pre-Vax) to the second vaccine administration (MVA2). Ellipses delineate the distribution of points per each group. Gray arrows link directional changes in bacterial abundance throughout the kick and kill intervention from baseline (pre-Vax). PERMANOVA statistical analysis of samples grouped by group, PatientID (patient internal identifier), and time point is shown on the top of the panel. Abbreviations: MAP, monitored antiretroviral pause; pre-Vax, baseline (1 day before first MVA vaccination); MVA1, 1 week after first MVA vaccination; RMD, 1 week after third romidepsin infusion; MVA2, 4 weeks after second MVA vaccination. Unadjusted p values are shown. Benjamini–Hochberg multiple hypothesis correction for p values ≤ 0.05 are provided in Additional file 2: Dataset S7

Increased Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio in viremic controllers negatively correlated with longitudinal HIV-1 viral reservoir size

The Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio inversely and significantly correlated with longitudinal total CD4+ T cell-associated HIV-1 DNA measured at study entry (rho  = − 0.6, padj  =  0.03) and over the intervention, whereas an opposite trend was observed for gene richness (rho = 0.65, padj  =  0.01 at study entry) (Fig. 3a). A similar trend was observed for cell-associated (CA) HIV-1 RNA (Bacteroidales/Clostridiales; rho  = − 0.7, padj   = 0.01 and gene richness; rho  = 0.61, padj  =  0.0 at study entry), although stronger correlations were found at RMD and MVA2 (Fig. 3b). In both assessments, alpha-diversity (Shannon index) exhibited weak positive correlation with the viral reservoir, being correlations not significant. Moreover, baseline ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales and gene richness showed a strong negative correlation (r ho = − 0.87, padj  =  0.0001) (Fig. 3a, b), in line with trends observed in the microbiota characterization. In the longitudinal comparison, controllers tended to displayed lower viral reservoir size (Fig. 3c, d), although differences were statistically significant only for CA HIV-1 RNA at RMD and MVA2 (p = 0.03) (Fig. 3d). An additional set of clinical and vaccine-response variables was screened for association with gut microbial signatures. Absolute CD4+ T cell count before ART initiation was the only factor significantly associated with the Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio (rho = 0.65, padj  =  0.01) and gene richness (r ho = − 0.62, padj  =  0.02), whereas a strong and inverse correlation was found between the Shannon index and CD4/CD8 ratio at BCN02 study entry (rho = 0.9, padj =  2.83e−05) (Additional file 1: Fig. S13).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Associations between HIV-1 reservoir size and gut microbial signatures. Spearman’s correlations between gut microbial signatures (ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales, gene richness, and alpha-diversity Shannon index) and longitudinal a HIV-1 DNA (HIV-1 DNA copies/106 CD4+ T cells) and b cell-associated (CA) HIV-1 RNA (HIV-1/TBP relative expression). Positive correlations are indicated in blue and negative correlations, in red. Color and size of the circles indicate the magnitude of the correlation. White asterisks indicate significant correlations (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment for multiple comparisons). Boxplots showing longitudinal comparison of c HIV-1 DNA and d CA HIV-1 RNA between controllers and non-controllers. Abbreviations: MAP, monitored antiretroviral pause; pre-Vax, baseline (1 day before first MVA vaccination); MVA1, 1 week after first MVA vaccination; RMD, 1 week after third romidepsin infusion; MVA2, 4 weeks after second MVA vaccination

Distinct bacterial protein signatures associated with viremia control

Using baseline proteomic data (15,214 bacterial proteins in total), 24 orders and 69 genera were quantified across samples (Additional file 2: Dataset S2). The abundance of total Clostridiales and Bacteroidales orders derived from proteome data was not different between groups (Fig. 4a, b). However, several Clostridiales genera were decreased in controllers, i.e., Eubacterium (− 3.71%; p = 0.03), Pseudoflavonifractor (− 0.49%; p = 0.049), Oscillibacter (− 0.14%; p = 0.07), whereas Blautia was increased (+ 5.02%; p = 0.03) (Fig. 4a). Unbiased hierarchical clustering based on Clostridiales genera showed protein differences (p < 0.025) between groups (Fig. 4c). Viremic controllers were enriched in bacterial proteins from Blautia and Ruminococcus, and depleted in proteins derived from other Clostridiales such as Clostridium, Eubacterium, Coprococcus, Faecalibacterium, Oscillibacter, and Pseudoflavinofactor. Pathways associated with Blautia included galactose, starch/sucrose, and glyoxylate/dicarboxylate metabolism as well as ribosome activity (Fig. 4d). Butyrate and other short-chain fatty acid metabolism pathways were similar in both groups (Fig. 4c, d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Baseline metaproteomic signatures associated with HIV control after ART interruption. Comparison of Clostridiales and Bacteroidales abundances derived from gut metaproteome data in controllers and non-controllers at study entry. No differences in Clostridiales or Bacteroidales proteome at the order-level were observed. c Baseline levels of Clostridiales proteins distinguished controllers from non-controllers in a hierarchical clustering. d Functional annotation of Clostridiales bacterial proteins using KEGG gene ontology identified baseline differences in cellular metabolism pathways between groups. Abbreviations: C = controllers, NC = non-controllers, SC = spectral count. Unadjusted p values are shown. Benjamini–Hochberg multiple hypothesis correction for p values ≤ 0.05 are provided in Additional file 2: Dataset S7

Increased baseline immune activation and inflammatory response transcripts in viremic controllers

Full-PBMC gene expression analysis detected a total of 27,426 transcripts at baseline, after filtering for low-expressed genes (Additional file 2: Dataset S3). Using DESeq2 [30], a total of 31 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified (log2 FoldChange = 0 and padj < 0.1), of which 15 and 16 were upregulated in controllers and non-controllers, respectively (Fig. 5a and Additional file 3: Table S1). Hierarchical clustering based on transcriptional DEG profiles showed that controllers grouped together, while non-controllers separated into two distinct expression groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S14a). Upregulated genes in non-controllers included 11 transcripts with unknown function (Additional file 3: Table S2), which were excluded from downstream analyses. Upregulated genes in controllers (Fig. 5b and Additional file 1: Fig. S14b-c), such as myeloperoxidase (MPO), defensin alpha 1 and 4 (DEFA1, DEFA4), and neutrophil elastase (ELANE) (Additional file 3: Table S2) were known to be implicated in immune response signaling and regulation of inflammatory processes [34, 35]. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirmed that genes upregulated in controllers were enriched in functions related to immune system activation, such as neutrophil-mediate immunity, leukocyte degranulation and antimicrobial humoral response (Fig. 5c and Additional file 3: Table S3). Moreover, a group of inflammation-related plasma proteins was significantly increased in controllers at baseline (Additional file 1: Supplementary results and Fig. S15).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Baseline functional enrichment in levels of immune activation and inflammatory response in viremic controllers. a Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between controllers and non-controllers at baseline (pre-Vax) with adjusted p value < 0.1 (violet dots), adjusted p value < 0.05 (red dots) and log2 (foldchange) > 2 and adjusted p value < 0.05 (green dots). Gray-colored dots represent genes not displaying statistical significance (BH-adjusted p value > 0.1). The log2 fold change on the x-axis indicates the magnitude of change, while the −log10 (p-adjust) on the y-axis indicates the significance of each gene. b Violin plots showing relative expression levels (rlog, regularized log transformation) of differentially expressed genes with functional annotation. c Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in controllers. In the y-axis, only representative enriched GO terms (biological process) are reported (terms obtained after redundancy reduction by REVIGO). X-axis reports the percentage of genes in a given GO terms, expressed as ‘Gene ratio’. The color key from blue to red indicates low to high Bonferroni-adjusted log 10 p value. Dot sizes are based on the 'count' (genes) associated to each GO term. Significantly enriched GO terms, number of genes associated with each GO term and adjusted p values are provided in Additional file 3: Table S3

Integration analysis between Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio, host immune activation transcripts, bacterial proteins, and HIV-1 reservoir size

The baseline Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio positively correlated (padj  < 0.05) with differentially expressed genes involved in inflammatory response and immune system activation, including DEFA1, DEFA4, TOP1MT, CTSG, MPO, AZU1, ELANE (Fig. 6a, Spearman rho and adjusted p values are given in Additional file 2: Dataset S5). Additional correlation and enrichment analysis extended to the full set of host transcripts supported such observation (Fig. 6b), also showing significant associations with the baseline viral reservoir (Additional file 1: Supplementary results and Fig. S16). In the integrated analysis of metagenomic, transcriptomic, and metaproteomic data for the identification of discriminating signatures between controllers and non-controllers, Bacteroidales and Clostridiales were clearly separated through the components (Additional file 1: Fig. S17a). While Bacteroidales clustered and positively associated with immune activation transcripts (MPO, AZU1, ELANE, TCN1, DEFA1, BPI, DEF4) as well as proteins from Ruminococcus, Blautia, and Prevotella, the order Clostridiales inversely correlated with such features (Additional file 1: Fig. S17a-b). Multi-omics correlations at lower taxonomic scale, including viral reservoir data confirmed that Bacteroidales species (B. dorei and B. eggerthii) inversely correlated with HIV-1 DNA levels, whereas members of Clostridiales (S. unclassified, D. formicigenerans, and E. siraeum) positively correlated with both HIV-1 DNA and CA HIV-1 RNA (Fig. 6c). In turn, viral reservoir size negatively correlated with genes involved in neutrophil-mediated immunity and host defense (Fig. 6c and Additional file 2: Dataset S6). These data together showed positive associations between Bacteroidales taxa and host transcripts related to immune system activation, and in turn negative correlation with the HIV-1 viral reservoir. Whereas, members within the order Clostridiales showed the opposite trend. Such observations emerged by analyzing either the ratio or individual taxa, further supporting potential pre-existing interactions between intestinal Bacteroidales species, host immune activation, and reservoir size in viremic controllers.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Integrative analysis of baseline gut microbial signatures, immune activation-related transcripts, bacterial proteins and HIV-1 reservoir. a Spearman’s correlations between the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales and DEGs (annotated transcripts). Color and size of the circles indicate the magnitude of the correlation. White asterisks indicate significant correlations (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment for multiple comparisons). b Network visualizing significant Spearman’s correlations between the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales and transcripts involved in the enrichment analysis described in Additional file 3: Table S4. Transcripts are represented as vertices and border width is proportional to transcript expression (log2 |cpmTMM_w0 +1|) in controllers. Edge width indicates the magnitude of correlation. c Network showing Spearman's correlation between viral reservoir (CA HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA), bacterial species within Bacteroidales and Clostrdiales, host transcripts correlated with the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostrdiales and bacterial proteins (p ≤ 0.025). Features are showed as vertices and colored by ‘omic’ dataset. Edge width indicates the magnitude of correlation coefficient. Protein-associated bacterial genera are reported in parentheses. In all panels, positive and negative correlations are indicated in blue and red, respectively. Abbreviations: DEGs, differentially expressed genes between controllers and non-controllers; R, Ruminococcus; Ps, Pseudoflavonifactor and pre-Vax, baseline timepoint (1 day before first MVA vaccination)

Discussion

In this proof-of-concept study, a longitudinal multi-‘omics’ analysis identified the Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio as a novel gut microbiome signature associated with HIV-1 reservoir size and viremic control during a monitored ART pause. Individuals with high Bacteroidales/Clostridiales ratio showed gene expression signatures related to immune activation, particularly neutrophil-mediated immunity and antimicrobial humoral response, which negatively correlated with the viral reservoir size. Our findings largely arise from unsupervised analyses where many other signatures could have emerged, especially given the relatively low number of individuals analyzed. However, they are internally coherent and consistent with a theoretical framework where increased inflammation might contribute to immune-mediated HIV-1 control. They also suggest a putative biomarker for safer ART interruptions in HIV cure studies.

The gut microbiome of controllers was enriched in pro-inflammatory species, such as P. copri [36], and depleted in bacteria, traditionally associated with the maintenance of gut homeostasis through production of SCFAs [37], including R. intestinalis and Subdoligranulum spp. Lower microbial diversity and gene richness found in controllers were consistent with a previous work from our group in people living with HIV [38], as well as other studies [39], in which higher gene richness associated with increased levels of butyrate-producing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Microbial functional enrichment in lipid and fatty acid biosynthesis in controllers might be reflective of mechanisms of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and production of inflammatory mediators [40] mediated by members of Bacteroidales [41]. No discernible longitudinal variations were observed in the gut microbiome of BCN02 participants, in line with previous evidence in oral typhoid immunization [16]. Of note, the gut microbiome in healthy population has been described generally resilient to perturbations [42]. Taken together, these observations would suggest a trend toward the maintenance of a relative stability in the gut microbiome composition upon vaccination. Baseline metaproteome analysis confirmed that functional differences between controllers and non-controllers were mainly driven by Clostridiales, which were actively producing microbial proteins in both groups albeit in distinct functional contexts. Further discriminating baseline signatures linked to increased immune system activation and inflammatory response in controllers emerged from PBMC transcriptome and inflammation-related plasma proteins profiling. It also emerged that the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales inversely correlated with the viral reservoir size in terms of HIV-1 DNA and CA HIV-1 RNA. Although controllers did not display significantly lower viral reservoir size compared to non-controllers, such associations were consistent with previous studies suggesting a role of low viral reservoir on ART interruption outcomes [9]. The results of our independent analyses (i.e., different omics approaches), as well as their integration suggest that baseline immune activation potentially associated with a microbial shift toward pro-inflammatory bacteria and lower viral reservoir may contribute to sustained post-ART interruption HIV-1 control. While there is evidence suggesting a strong impact of the gut microbiota composition on host immune system and inflammatory status [43], the mechanistic basis of how microbial communities may interact with the viral reservoir and, in turn, exert immunomodulatory effects on HIV-1 control during ART interruption remains to be delineated. We speculate that a pre-existing, altered balance of ‘beneficial’ gut microbial groups, such as Clostridiales, and concomitant overabundance of pro-inflammatory bacteria would boost host immune system activation, thus triggering a prompt control of rebounding virus, as observed in controllers. In support to this hypothesis, increased abundance of members from Clostridiales were previously associated with neutrophilia and lower poliovirus and tetanus-hepatitis B vaccine response [18]. Moreover, baseline transcriptional pro-inflammatory and immune activation signatures were suggested as potential predictors of increased influenza [44], systemic lupus erythematosus [45] and hepatitis B [46] vaccine-induced immune response, with weaker responses in elderly [44, 46]. It is then reasonable to postulate that immune activation prior vaccination together with microbiome-associated factors may affect vaccine outcomes. Results obtained in this exploratory study are indented to generate hypotheses and potentially contribute to establish a coherent framework for subsequent confirmatory studies. In this context, several studies have suggested plausible mechanisms by which the microbiota could modulate immune responses to vaccination in humans [47]). Despite causal links remain to be fully deciphered, the ability of the microbiota to directly interact with immune cells in the gut as well as to regulate the systemic availability of critical metabolites in distal locations is well-established [47]. A few studies also attempted to investigate the exact role played by the gut microbiota in HIV control. Despite gut dysbiosis persistence in HIV-1 infected patients after ART initiation (reduced gut microbial richness and depletion in anti-inflammatory bacteria [48]), microbial richness may be restored by prolonged ART treatment [49]. Also, elite controllers, who spontaneously control HIV replication without ART, showed higher gut microbial richness with a metabolic profile resembling that of HIV-uninfected adults [50] and increased Th17 cells in the gut mucosa compared to ART-treated patients [51]. In line with our results, a recent study showed enriched levels of Bacteroidetes genera, such as Bacteroides and Prevotella, in patients with sustained HIV control during ART interruption, after receiving dendritic cells-based HIV-1 immunization [52]. Moreover, additional evidence on HIV virologic controllers receiving a TLR7 agonist before ART interruption with baseline enrichment in P. copri and negative association between abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus and time to viral rebound suggested a potential impact of certain microbiome species on HIV persistence [53]. Together, such observations illustrate the exceptional challenge in deconvoluting the complex dynamics between specific microbial species or byproducts and HIV-1 control. Our study has several limitations. Due to eligibility criteria in the parental BCN02 study, there was a limited sample size, and we were unable to include a control arm without the intervention. Our considerations were therefore narrowed to three individuals showing viremic control during ART interruption. In addition, given the small sample size and limitations of non-parametric methods coupled with multiple testing correction [54], we used a reasonable threshold of 10% false-discovery rate (adjusted p value < 0.1) to prevent false negatives. Another fundamental issue to consider is that this sub-study was largely restricted to Caucasian/MSM population. Large-scale studies have revealed broad differences in the gut microbiome composition [55] and modes of HIV transmission [56] across distinct geographical populations, thus leading to dramatic variations in the characteristics of study participants at study entry [57]. MSM sexual behavior itself was associated with Prevotella-rich/Bacteroides-poor microbiota profile and increased microbial diversity [58], suggesting that failure to control for this factor could confound data interpretation. Yet, most of the HIV-associated microbiome studies published to date, including this, have largely focused on single populations or individuals [57], posing the question on the generalizability of the results in different population settings. Ensuring diversity among study participants (i.e., in ethnic group, sexual behavior, or transmission mode) in future microbiome studies, is then critical to both identify population-specific features and to achieve broader-reaching biological conclusions. Bearing these limitations in mind, our results should be interpreted with caution, emphasizing the need of independent validation in randomized and placebo-controlled trials to assess potentially unmeasured confounders and provide further perspectives on factors that might induce gut microbial shifts. Upcoming analyses in larger longitudinal trials, including the recently reported AELIX-002 trial [59], where fecal samples have been stored longitudinally, are expected to validate our results. These preliminary findings might have important implications in the design of HIV-1 cure intervention trials that include ART interruption. As proposed for other therapeutic areas [60], microbiome-associated predictive patterns could help to optimize patient stratification, thus resulting in more targeted studies and higher efficacy of HIV-1 interventions. In addition, if a given resident microbial community is to be defined that is indeed predictive of viral control during ART interruption, then modulating participants’ gut microbiota before immunization might potentially impact vaccine responsiveness and ultimately, clinical outcomes. While host-genetics and other vaccine-associated factors as baseline predictors are less amendable, the gut microbiome is potentially modifiable and even transferrable to another host. Strategies manipulating the gut microbiota composition and relative by-products via prebiotics and/or probiotics administration [61] or microbiota engraftment following fecal microbiota transplantation [62] are under intense evaluation [63], albeit with several limitations.

Conclusions

In this exploratory study, we identified pre-existing gut microbial and immune activation signatures as potential predictors of sustained HIV-1 control in the absence of ART, providing a potential target for future treatment strategies and opening up new avenues for a functional HIV cure.

Availability of data and materials

Datasets supporting the conclusions of this study are available as additional information (Additional file 2). Metagenome and RNA-seq data have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and are accessible through ENA accession numbers PRJEB42384 and PRJEB43195. The code and databases used for data analysis are available at 10.5281/zenodo.4876340

Abbreviations

ART:

Antiretroviral therapy

ATI:

Antiretroviral therapy interruption

BH-adjusted:

Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted

HUMAnN2:

HMP unified metabolic analysis network v.2

MAP:

Monitored antiretroviral therapy pause

MVA:

MVA.HIVconsv

RMD:

Romidepsin

SCFA:

Short chain fatty acids

References

  1. Volberding PA, Deeks SG. Antiretroviral therapy and management of HIV infection. Lancet. 2010;376(9734):49–62.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Finzi D, Hermankova M, Pierson T, Carruth LM, Buck C, Chaisson RE, et al. Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Science (80-). 1997;278:1295–300.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siliciano JD, Kajdas J, Finzi D, Quinn TC, Chadwick K, Margolick JB, et al. Long-term follow-up studies confirm the stability of the latent reservoir for HIV-1 in resting CD4+ T cells. Nat Med. 2003;9:727–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chun TW, Davey RT, Engel D, Lane HC, Fauci AS. AIDS: Re-emergence of HIV after stopping therapy. Nature. 1999;401:874–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Namazi G, Fajnzylber JM, Aga E, Bosch RJ, Acosta EP, Sharaf R, et al. The control of HIV after antiretroviral medication pause (CHAMP) study: posttreatment controllers identified from 14 clinical studies. J Infect Dis. 2018;218:1954–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turnbull EL, Wong M, Wang S, Wei X, Jones NA, Conrod KE, et al. Kinetics of expansion of epitope-specific T cell responses during primary HIV-1 infection. J Immunol. 2009;182:7131–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu MKP, Hawkins N, Ritchie AJ, Ganusov VV, Whale V, Brackenridge S, et al. Vertical T cell immunodominance and epitope entropy determine HIV-1 escape. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:380–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Posteraro B, Pastorino R, Di Giannantonio P, Ianuale C, Amore R, Ricciardi W, et al. The link between genetic variation and variability in vaccine responses: systematic review and meta-analyses. Vaccine. 2014;32:1661–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Li JZ, Etemad B, Ahmed H, Aga E, Bosch RJ, Mellors JW, et al. The size of the expressed HIV reservoir predicts timing of viral rebound after treatment interruption. AIDS. 2016;30:343–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The influence of the intestinal microbiome on vaccine responses. Vaccine. 2018;36(30):4433–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciabattini A, Olivieri R, Lazzeri E, Medaglini D. Role of the microbiota in the modulation of vaccine immune responses. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1305.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sui Y, Lewis GK, Wang Y, Berckmueller K, Frey B, Dzutsev A, et al. Mucosal vaccine efficacy against intrarectal SHIV is independent of anti-Env antibody response. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:1314–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pantaleo G, Janes H, Karuna S, Grant S, Ouedraogo GL, Allen M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a multivalent HIV vaccine comprising envelope protein with either DNA or NYVAC vectors (HVTN 096): a phase 1b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2019;6:e737–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cram JA, Fiore-Gartland AJ, Srinivasan S, Karuna S, Pantaleo G, Tomaras GD, et al. Human gut microbiota is associated with HIV-reactive immunoglobulin at baseline and following HIV vaccination. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225622.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams WB, Han Q, Haynes BF. Cross-reactivity of HIV vaccine responses and the microbiome. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018;13(1):9–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eloe-Fadrosh EA, McArthur MA, Seekatz AM, Drabek EF, Rasko DA, Sztein MB, et al. Impact of oral typhoid vaccination on the human gut microbiota and correlations with S. Typhi-specific immunological responses. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62026.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris VC, Armah G, Fuentes S, Korpela KE, Parashar U, Victor JC, et al. Significant correlation between the infant gut microbiome and rotavirus vaccine response in rural Ghana. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:34–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Huda MN, Lewis Z, Kalanetra KM, Rashid M, Ahmad SM, Raqib R, et al. Stool microbiota and vaccine responses of infants. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):e362–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Julg B, Dee L, Ananworanich J, Barouch DH, Bar K, Caskey M, et al. Recommendations for analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions in HIV research trials—report of a consensus meeting. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(4):e259–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mothe B, Rosás-Umbert M, Coll P, Manzardo C, Puertas MC, Morón-López S, et al. HIVconsv vaccines and romidepsin in early-treated HIV-1-infected individuals: safety, immunogenicity and effect on the viral reservoir (study BCN02). Front Immunol. 2020;11:823.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei DG, Chiang V, Fyne E, Balakrishnan M, Barnes T, Graupe M, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin induces HIV expression in CD4 T cells from patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy at concentrations achieved by clinical dosing. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(4):e1004071.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mothe B, Manzardo C, Sanchez-Bernabeu A, Coll P, Morón-López S, Puertas MC, et al. Therapeutic vaccination refocuses T-cell responses towards conserved regions of HIV-1 in early treated individuals (BCN 01 study). EClinicalMedicine. 2019;11:65–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Létourneau S, Im EJ, Mashishi T, Brereton C, Bridgeman A, Yang H, et al. Design and pre-clinical evaluation of a universal HIV-1 vaccine. PLoS One. 2007;2(10):e984.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Søgaard OS, Graversen ME, Leth S, Olesen R, Brinkmann CR, Nissen SK, et al. The depsipeptide romidepsin reverses HIV-1 latency in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(9):e1005142.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, Scholz M, Weingart G, Pasolli E, et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12(10):902–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li J, Wang J, Jia H, Cai X, Zhong H, Feng Q, et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:834–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Franzosa EA, McIver LJ, Rahnavard G, Thompson LR, Schirmer M, Weingart G, et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods. 2018;15:962–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klatt NR, Cheu R, Birse K, Zevin AS, Perner M, Noël-Romas L, et al. Vaginal bacteria modify HIV tenofovir microbicide efficacy in African women. Science (80-). 2017;356:938–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104886. Cited 2017 Feb 22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):1–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Björkesten J, Thorsen SB, Ekman D, et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao KA. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(11):e1005752.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aratani Y. Myeloperoxidase: its role for host defense, inflammation, and neutrophil function. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2018;640:47–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Holm J, Hansen SI. Characterization of soluble folate receptors (folate binding proteins) in humans. Biological roles and clinical potentials in infection and malignancy. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics. 2020;1868(10):140466.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Iljazovic A, Roy U, Gálvez EJC, Lesker TR, Zhao B, Gronow A, et al. Perturbation of the gut microbiome by Prevotella spp. enhances host susceptibility to mucosal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2020.

  37. Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Petito V, Gasbarrini A. Commensal clostridia: leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Gut Pathog. 2013;5(1):23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Guillén Y, Noguera-Julian M, Rivera J, Casadellà M, Zevin AS, Rocafort M, et al. Low nadir CD4+ T-cell counts predict gut dysbiosis in HIV-1 infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:232–46.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Medzhitov R, Janeway CJ. Advances in immunology: innate immunity. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:338–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. d’Hennezel E, Abubucker S, Murphy LO, Cullen TW. Total lipopolysaccharide from the human gut microbiome silences toll-like receptor signaling. mSystems. 2017;2(6):e00046–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fassarella M, Blaak EE, Penders J, Nauta A, Smidt H, Zoetendal EG. Gut microbiome stability and resilience: elucidating the response to perturbations in order to modulate gut health. Gut. 2020.

  43. Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020;30(6):492–506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Avey S, Cheung F, Fermin D, Frelinger J, Gaujoux R, Gottardo R, et al. Multicohort analysis reveals baseline transcriptional predictors of influenza vaccination responses. Sci Immunol. 2017;2(14):eaal4656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kotliarov Y, Sparks R, Martins AJ, Mulè MP, Lu Y, Goswami M, et al. Broad immune activation underlies shared set point signatures for vaccine responsiveness in healthy individuals and disease activity in patients with lupus. Nat Med. 2020;26:618–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fourati S, Cristescu R, Loboda A, Talla A, Filali A, Railkar R, et al. Pre-vaccination inflammation and B-cell signalling predict age-related hyporesponse to hepatitis B vaccination. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10369.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. de Jong SE, Olin A, Pulendran B. The impact of the microbiome on immunity to vaccination in humans. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28(2):169–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rocafort M, Noguera-Julian M, Rivera J, Pastor L, Guillén Y, Langhorst J, et al. Evolution of the gut microbiome following acute HIV-1 infection. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Parbie PK, Mizutani T, Ishizaka A, Kawana-Tachikawa A, Runtuwene LR, Seki S, et al. Dysbiotic fecal microbiome in HIV-1 infected individuals in Ghana. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:646467.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vesterbacka J, Rivera J, Noyan K, Parera M, Neogi U, Calle M, et al. Richer gut microbiota with distinct metabolic profile in HIV infected elite controllers. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6269.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim CJ, Kovacs C, Chun TW, Kandel G, Osborne BJW, Huibner S, et al. Antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected elite controllers: impact on gut immunology, microbial translocation, and biomarkers of serious non-AIDS conditions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(5):514–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pastor-Ibáñez R, Díez-Fuertes F, Sánchez-Palomino S, Alcamí J, Plana M, Torrents D, et al. Impact of transcriptome and gut microbiome on the response of hiv-1 infected individuals to a dendritic cell-based hiv therapeutic vaccine. Vaccines. 2021;9(7):694.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cai Y, Deeks SG, Brinson C, Ramgopal M, Jones N, DeJesus E, et al. HIV rebound in controllers is associated with specific fecal microbiome profile. In: CROI - Virtual Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Carvajal-Rodríguez A, de Uña-Alvarez J, Rolán-Alvarez E. A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Gaulke CA, Sharpton TJ. The influence of ethnicity and geography on human gut microbiome composition. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1495–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. De Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier E, De Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in resource-poor countries: translating research into policy and practice. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:1175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Li SX, Armstrong AJS, Neff CP, Shaffer M, Lozupone CA, Palmer BE. Complexities of gut microbiome dysbiosis in the context of HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;99:600–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Noguera-Julian M, Rocafort M, Guillén Y, Rivera J, Casadellà M, Nowak P, et al. Gut microbiota linked to sexual preference and HIV infection. EBioMedicine. 2016;5:135–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bailon L, Llano A, Cedeño S, Lopez MB, Alarcón-Soto Y, Coll P, et al. A placebo-controlled ATI trial of HTI vaccines in early treated HIV infection. In: CROI - Virtual Conf Retroviruses Opportunistic Infect; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Boessen R, Heerspink HJL, De Zeeuw D, Grobbee DE, Groenwold RHH, Roes KCB. Improving clinical trial efficiency by biomarker-guided patient selection. Trials. 2014;15(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wilson NL, Moneyham LD, Alexandrov AW. A systematic review of probiotics as a potential intervention to restore gut health in HIV infection. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013;24:98–111.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Rutishauser RL, Pao M, Hunt PW, Lynch SV, McCune JM, et al. Limited engraftment of donor microbiome via one-time fecal microbial transplantation in treated HIV-infected individuals. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:440–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rosel-Pech C, Chávez-Torres M, Bekker-Méndez VC, Pinto-Cardoso S. Therapeutic avenues for restoring the gut microbiome in HIV infection. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020;54:188–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all volunteers for participating in this study and the BCN02 study group.

BCN02 Study Group. IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute-HIVACAT Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain: Susana Benet, Christian Brander, Samandhy Cedeño, Bonaventura Clotet, Pep Coll, Anuska Llano, Javier Martinez-Picado, Marta Marszalek, Sara Morón-López, Beatriz Mothe, Roger Paredes, Maria C. Puertas, Miriam Rosás-Umbert, Marta Ruiz-Riol. Fundació Lluita contra la Sida, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain: Roser Escrig, Silvia Gel, Miriam López, Cristina Miranda, José Moltó, Jose Muñoz, Nuria Perez-Alvarez, Jordi Puig, Boris Revollo, Jessica Toro. Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute, Badalona, Spain: Ana María Barriocanal, Cristina Perez-Reche. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain: Magí Farré. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling and simultation, Institut de Recerca de l’Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain: Marta Valle. Hospital Clinic- HIVACAT, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain: Christian Manzardo, Juan Ambrosioni, Irene Ruiz, Cristina Rovira, Carmen Hurtado, Carmen Ligero, Emma Fernández, Sonsoles Sánchez-Palomino, and Jose M. Miró. Projecte dels NOMS-Hispanosida, BCN Checkpoint, Barcelona, Spain: Antonio Carrillo, Michael Meulbroek, Ferran Pujol and Jorge Saz. The Jenner Institute, The Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, UK: Nicola Borthwick, Alison Crook, Edmund G. Wee and Tomáš Hanke.

Funding

This study was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project “PI16/01421” (co-funded by European Regional Development Fund “A way to make Europe”). The project was sponsored in part by Grifols and received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement N° 847943 (MISTRAL). The BCN02 clinical trial was an investigator-initiated study funded by the ISCIII PI15/01188 grant, the HIVACAT Catalan research program for an HIV vaccine and the Fundació Gloria Soler. Some sub-analyses of the BCN02 trial were partly funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement 681137-EAVI2020 and by NIH grant P01-AI131568. A.Bu lab was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (HB3-164066) and the National Institutes for Health Research (R01DK112254). J.M.P lab was supported by grant PID2019-109870RB-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and in part by Grifols. J.M.M. received a personal 80:20 research grant from Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain, during 2017–21.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

R.P, B.M, J.M, B.C, J.M.M, and C.B conceived and designed the study. B.M, R.P, C.M, J.M.M, and C.B recruited the study participants and performed their clinical evaluations. M.P and M.C performed fecal DNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing, under the supervision of M.N.J, Y.G, and R.P. B.O and C.D performed PBMC transcriptomics and soluble factors determinations, under the supervision of M.R.R and C.B. M.C.P performed the viral reservoir size determinations, under the supervision of J.M.P. L.N.R, M.D.L, S.K, and K.B performed fecal metaproteomics experiments and data analysis, under the supervision of A.Bu. A.Bo performed bioinformatics and statistical analyses of metagenome, transcriptome, soluble factors, clinical and integration data, under the supervision of M.N.J and R.P. L.N.R performed the bioinformatics and statistical analyses of fecal metaproteome data, under the supervision of A.Bu. F.C.M, M.N.J, A.Bo, B.O, and Y.G contributed to data management. A.Bo and R.P wrote the paper, which was reviewed, edited, and approved by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alessandra Borgognone or Roger Paredes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional ethical review board of the participating institutions (Reference Nr AC-15-108-R) and by the Spanish Regulatory Authorities (EudraCT 2015-002300-84). All participants provided written informed consent in accordance to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and local personal data protection law (LOPD 15/1999).

Consent for publication

Where individual patient data is included, all patients provided informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary methods. Supplementary results. Figure S1. BCN02-microbiome study design and sample collection strategy. Figure S2. Overview of sample disposition for multi-omic analysis. Figure S3. Taxonomic classification of fecal samples at the order level. Figure S4. Differential abundance in Methanobacteriales between controllers and non-controllers. Figure S5. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) at the species level. Figure S6. Longitudinal feature-volatility analysis of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales species. Figure S7. Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index between controllers and non-controllers. Figure S8. Gut microbiome profiling excluding B07 participant from non-controllers arm. Figure S9. Differentially abundant metabolic pathways from Bacteroidales and Clostridiales at the study entry. Figure S10. Differential metabolic pathways between controllers and non-controllers. Figure S11. Longitudinal variation of differentially abundant pathways over the trial. Figure S12. Differential archaeal metabolic pathways between controllers and non-controllers. Figure S13. Spearman’s correlation between clinical data, vaccine response and gut microbial variables. Figure S14. Differentially expressed PBMC host genes between controllers and non-controllers at baseline. Figure S15. Protein inflammation markers from controllers and non-controllers at baseline. Figure S16. Functional enrichment of transcripts correlated with the ratio Bacteroidales:Clostridiales and viral reservoir. Figure S17. Integrated analysis of microbiome, metaproteome and transcriptome data.

Additional file 2: Dataset S1.

Longitudinal microbial composition (relative abundance) in viremic controllers and non-controllers analyzed by MetaPhlAn2.0. Dataset S2. Raw bacterial protein counts at baseline in viremic controllers and non-controllers analysed using Scaffold Q+ software v4.9.0. Dataset S3. Raw gene counts at baseline in viremic controllers and non-controllers estimated using RSEM v1.3.0. Dataset S4. Soluble factors (normalized protein expression units) from the Olink inflammation panel at baseline in viremic controllers and non-controllers. Dataset S5. List of transcripts significantly correlated with the Bacteroidales:Clostridiales ratio adjusted for multiple comparisons (spearman’s rho and corresponding q-value<0.05 are reported). Dataset S6. Spearman’s correlation (rho=0.5) between viral reservoir (CA HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA), bacterial species (Bacteroidales and Clostrdiales), transcripts correlated with the ratio Bacteroidales / Clostridiales and differentially abundant microbial proteins (p<0.025). Dataset S7. Benjamini–Hochberg multiple hypothesis correction for unadjusted p-values ≤ 0.05 (metagenomics and metaproteomics datasets).

Additional file 3: Table S1.

List of differentially expressed genes between controllers and non-controllers at baseline (adjusted p-value <0.1and log2 FoldChange = 0). Table S2. Detailed information of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between controllers and non-controllers at baseline (adjusted p-value <0.1 and log2 FoldChange = 0). Table S3. GO terms from enrichment analysis (biological process) based on upregulated genes in viremic controllers (n. transcripts =15). Table S4. Enriched GO biological process terms of host transcripts significantly correlated with the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales. Table S5. Enriched GO biological process terms of transcripts (n=453) significantly correlated with the ratio Bacteroidales/Clostridiales and viral reservoir (CA HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 DNA). Table S6. Summary of shotgun metagenomics sequencing yield from longitudinally-collected fecal samples. Statistics of reads mapped to integrated gene catalog (IGC) are also shown.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borgognone, A., Noguera-Julian, M., Oriol, B. et al. Gut microbiome signatures linked to HIV-1 reservoir size and viremia control. Microbiome 10, 59 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01247-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01247-6

Keywords

  • HIV-1 post-treatment control
  • Gut microbiome
  • Therapeutic HIV-1 vaccine
  • Viral reservoir size
  • Microbiome-based predictive biomarker