Skip to main content
Download PDF

Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis

Microbiome volume 8, Article number: 45 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic infection and concomitant airway inflammation is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for people living with cystic fibrosis (CF). Although chronic infection in CF is undeniably polymicrobial, involving a lung microbiota, infection surveillance and control approaches remain underpinned by classical aerobic culture-based microbiology. How to use microbiomics to direct clinical management of CF airway infections remains a crucial challenge. A pivotal step towards leveraging microbiome approaches in CF clinical care is to understand the ecology of the CF lung microbiome and identify ecological patterns of CF microbiota across a wide spectrum of lung disease. Assessing sputum samples from 299 patients attending 13 CF centres in Europe and the USA, we determined whether the emerging relationship of decreasing microbiota diversity with worsening lung function could be considered a generalised pattern of CF lung microbiota and explored its potential as an informative indicator of lung disease state in CF.

Results

We tested and found decreasing microbiota diversity with a reduction in lung function to be a significant ecological pattern. Moreover, the loss of diversity was accompanied by an increase in microbiota dominance. Subsequently, we stratified patients into lung disease categories of increasing disease severity to further investigate relationships between microbiota characteristics and lung function, and the factors contributing to microbiota variance. Core taxa group composition became highly conserved within the severe disease category, while the rarer satellite taxa underpinned the high variability observed in the microbiota diversity. Further, the lung microbiota of individual patient were increasingly dominated by recognised CF pathogens as lung function decreased. Conversely, other bacteria, especially obligate anaerobes, increasingly dominated in those with better lung function. Ordination analyses revealed lung function and antibiotics to be main explanators of compositional variance in the microbiota and the core and satellite taxa. Biogeography was found to influence acquisition of the rarer satellite taxa.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that microbiota diversity and dominance, as well as the identity of the dominant bacterial species, in combination with measures of lung function, can be used as informative indicators of disease state in CF.

Video Abstract

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common autosomal recessive genetic disorder, affecting approximately 10,000 and 30,000 people in the UK and USA, respectively [1, 2]. Mutations of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene can lead to defects in the encoded epithelial cell apical membrane anion channel [3]. This results in defective ion transport, airway surface liquid depletion and absent or impaired mucociliary clearance [3]. Although the disorder is multi-systemic, the primary cause of morbidity and early mortality in this disease is attributable to progressive airway and lung parenchymal damage, resulting from a vicious cycle of unchecked airway infection and inflammation [4, 5].

A relatively small group of bacterial species, all of which can be readily isolated using conventional aerobic culture-based approaches, are associated with chronic lower respiratory infection in CF, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Haemophilus influenzae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter xylosoxidans [1]. Culture-based approaches have influenced everything from the way infections are treated to informing national CF registries on changing pathogen prevalences with age [6, 7]. However, molecular approaches have elucidated a much more complex picture of polymicrobial lower airway infection in this disease [8,9,10]. In light of the recognition that CF lung microbiota are multifarious, the limitations of culture-based diagnostic microbiology to characterise CF lung infections have become increasingly apparent [7]. The traditional ‘one microbe, one disease’ concept of infection pathogenesis and infection control in CF management has therefore been brought into question [6, 11, 12].

A crucial challenge in CF is how to use microbiomics to direct clinical management of airway infections. In a broader human microbiome context, it has been strongly advocated that interventions which could help treat a range of conditions, including chronic lung infections, will only be discovered by understanding the ecological and evolutionary relationships that members of a microbiota have with each other and with their host [13, 14]. A classical approach in traditional ecology has been to identify and study ecological patterns and subsequently proceed onto understanding the processes that generate those patterns [15, 16]. One potential pattern in the CF lower respiratory tract that warrants further investigation is that of a relationship between lung microbiota diversity and lung function [8, 10, 17, 18].

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), expressed as a normalised percent of the predicted value (%FEV1) [19], is widely used to monitor lung function and describe lung disease severity in CF and other lung diseases [20, 21]. Further, %FEV1 is useful as a clinical decision tool (i.e. whether to intensify treatment), as an outcome measure in clinical trials, as an important determinant in the timing of lung transplantation and as a predictor of long-term survival [22,23,24]. As such, %FEV1 is a key clinical outcome in cystic fibrosis and is currently the single best available clinical indicator of health for individuals living with the disease [1, 2, 23, 24].

The relationship of decreasing microbiota diversity with a reduction in lung function is an emergent ecological pattern in CF that has potential as an informative indicator of lung disease state in CF. However, evidence for this nascent pattern originated from microbiota studies based on small patient cohorts from single CF centres [8, 10, 17, 18]. To ascertain if this pattern is generalised requires testing with larger subject groups from multiple CF centres, encompassing the high interpatient variability inherent in CF [10, 25, 26]. In traditional ecology, it is generally anticipated that a reduction of species diversity will occur as a consequence of an environmental perturbation, such as a pollution event [27, 28]. Under these scenarios, unperturbed species-rich assemblages are typically evenly distributed but following a perturbation are replaced by species-poor-ones with high dominance and a restricted set of species [27, 28]. In a CF context, a reduction in %FEV1 could be taken as analogous to an environmental perturbation.

In the current study, we assessed sputum samples from a large multi-centre cohort of 299 individuals from 13 CF centres in Europe and the USA, inclusive of CF patients representing a broad cross-section of respiratory disease (Table 1). We employed high-throughput targeted amplicon sequencing to define the bacterial microbiota in the lower airways of each participant. This allowed us to determine whether the relationship between diversity and lung function holds and therefore is a generalised ecological pattern of CF lung microbiota. Further, it allowed us to ascertain if declines in lung microbiota diversity were accompanied with an increase in lung microbiota dominance. It also enabled us to elucidate the distribution of bacterial taxa, including recognised CF pathogens, across patients in relation to increasing lung disease severity. Additionally, we explored clinical and demographic factors that could explain variance in the CF lower airway microbiota.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics for all patients and when stratified by lung disease category
Full size table

Results

From 297 patient respiratory samples included in the final analyses (Table 1), 598 distinct bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified, with a mean (± SD) of 86.5 (± 47.3) OTUs per sample, and a minimum and maximum of 13 and 267 OTUs, respectively. Relationships between microbiota diversity and dominance with lung function were tested with linear regression (Fig. 1). Both diversity and dominance demonstrated significant linear relationships with %FEV1, wherein diversity decreased and dominance increased with a reduction in lung function. Further, a significant negative correlation was found between diversity and dominance, in that as diversity decreased, dominance increased (Fig. 1). In order to examine the relationships between lung function and lung microbiota characteristics further, patients were stratified into lung disease categories, as described in the US CF Foundation Patient Registry [1]. In this schema, lung function (as measured by %FEV1) is categorised as follows: greater than or equal to 70% predicted indicates mild/normal lung disease, 40–69% predicted indicates moderate lung disease and less than 40% predicted indicates severe lung disease [1].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relationships between microbiota diversity, dominance and lung function. a Fisher’s alpha index of diversity plotted against percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV1). b Berger-Parker dominance index and %FEV1. c Berger-Parker dominance index plotted against Fisher’s alpha index of diversity. In each case linear regression lines have been fitted: (a) r2 = 0.11, F1,295 = 36.7, P < 0.0001; (b) r2 = 0.10, F1,295 = 31.2, P < 0.0001 and (c) r2 = 0.41, F1,295 = 202.6, P < 0.0001

Full size image

Bacterial taxa were partitioned into either common and abundant core taxa or rarer and infrequent satellite taxa, based upon their prevalence and relative abundance across samples within each lung disease category (Fig. 2). Within the mild/normal category, 17 core and 499 satellite taxa occurred, with the former accounting for 64.1% of the cumulative relative abundance. In the moderate category, 17 core taxa accounting for 71.8% of the abundance, and 566 satellite taxa occurred. Within the severe category, in addition to 518 satellite taxa, 11 core taxa with a cumulative abundance of 78.7% occurred. Further, core or satellite status of recognised CF pathogens was determined. Within each lung disease category, four OTUs corresponding to recognised CF pathogens, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. maltophilia and B. cepacia complex, had core status, while two, H. influenzae and A. xylosoxidans, were satellite taxa (Fig. 2). Core taxa for each lung disease category are given in Table S1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution and abundance of bacterial taxa across patients in worsening lung disease categories. a Mild/normal. b Moderate. c Severe categories. Given is the percentage number of patient respiratory samples each bacterial taxon was observed to be distributed across, plotted against the mean percentage abundance across those samples. Core taxa are defined as those that fall within the upper quartile of distribution (orange circles), and satellite taxa (grey circles) defined as those that do not. Recognised pathogens are marked as follows: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, purple circle; Staphylococcus aureus, light green diamond; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, blue diamond; Burkholderia cepacia complex, green square; Haemophilus influenzae, light blue triangle and Achromobacter xylosoxidans, black triangle. Distribution-abundance relationship regression statistics: (a) r2 = 0.64, F1,514 = 927.3, P < 0.0001; (b) r2 = 0.62, F1,581 = 961.9, P < 0.0001; (c) r2 = 0.75, F1,527 = 1549.1, P < 0.0001. Common taxa are listed Table S1

Full size image

Common patterns of decreasing diversity with increasing lung disease severity were observed for the microbiota, the core taxa and satellite taxa (Fig. 3a). Kruskal-Wallis tests and Hedges’ d effect size measures were used to determine whether Fisher’s alpha indices of diversity were significantly different between lung disease categories (Fig. 3a, Table S2 and Figure S1). Diversity was significantly lower in the severe category when compared to the moderate and mild/normal categories in the microbiota and core taxa. Conversely, the opposite pattern was observed for dominance within the microbiota and core taxa group, where dominance was significantly higher in the severe category when compared to the two other categories, as determined by Kruskal-Wallis tests and Hedges’ d effect size measures (Fig. 3b; Table S3 and Figure S1). No significant relationships between diversity or dominance and disease category were found in the satellite taxa group.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of microbiota diversity, dominance and composition when stratified by lung disease category. In each instance, relationships within the microbiota, core taxa and satellite taxa are given. Changes in (a) Fisher’s alpha index of diversity and (b) Berger-Parker dominance index with lung disease category (%FEV1). Boxplots show 25–75th interquartile (IQR) range with whiskers showing 1.5 times IQR. Black circles indicate individual patients and cross symbol represents the mean. Asterisks denote significant differences in diversity or dominance between two lung disease categories following both Kruskal-Wallis tests and Hedges’ d effect size analysis.(c) Variation in microbiota composition within (columns) and between (circles) lung disease categories using the Bray-Curtis index of similarity. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean. Asterisks denote significant differences in composition between lung disease categories following one-way PERMANOVA tests with Bonferroni correction. Summary statistics for Kruskal-Wallis and PERMANOVA analyses are provided in supplementary Tables S2, S3 and S4. Hedges’ d effect size analyses are provided in Figure S1

Full size image

Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) tests determined that the compositions of the microbiota, the core taxa and satellite taxa were significantly different across the strata of lung disease (Fig. 3c, Table S4). For the core taxa, within category similarity notably increased with decreasing lung function, ranging from a mean Bray-Curtis similarity (±SD) of 0.29 ± 0.25 in the mild/normal category to 0.75 ± 0.16 in the severe category (Fig. 3c, Table S4). Similarity of percentages (SIMPER) analysis allowed determination of which taxa contributed most to the dissimilarity in microbiota composition across the lung disease categories (Table 2). From the top six OTUs that contributed most to the dissimilarity, these included five identified as recognised CF respiratory pathogens, including P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, B. cepacia complex, S. maltophilia (all core taxa in all categories) and H. influenzae (satellite taxon in all categories). Additionally, the second top taxon was an OTU identified as belonging to the Prevotella genus, putatively labelled as P. melaninogenica. The remaining taxa within the SIMPER table predominantly comprised OTUs from the Streptococcus genus or OTUs from genera consisted of strict anaerobic species, including Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Rothia and Veillonella (Table 2). As a complement to the SIMPER analysis, the frequency of which taxa dominated patient’s lower airway microbiota within and across lung disease categories was determined (Fig. 4). A clear pattern emerged of increasing dominance by recognised pathogens, which was mainly driven by the OTU identified as P. aeruginosa, as lung function decreased (Fig. 4a). Conversely, better lung function associated with increasing dominance by other bacterial taxa, especially the putative P. melaninogenica OTU (Fig. 4b).

Table 2 Similarity of percentage (SIMPER) analysis of microbiota dissimilarity (Bray-Curtis) between lung disease categories
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Dominant bacterial taxa across lung disease categories. Percent frequency of dominance for (a) recognised CF pathogens and (b) other bacterial taxa in each lung disease category. Dominant taxon is defined as the most abundant taxon by relative abundance within a given lung microbiota sample

Full size image

Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to relate the variability in the composition of the lung microbiota, the core taxa and satellite taxa to clinical/demographic factors (outlined in Table 1) and geographical distance between CF centres. Principal coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) were calculated from grid coordinates of the 13 CF centres and used as explanatory spatial variables for RDA. Based on the RDA direct ordination approach, the microbiota, core taxa and satellite taxa were significantly correlated with factors listed in Table 3. Antibiotic exposure and %FEV1 were the most significant factors in explaining variance within the microbiota and core taxa, followed to a lesser extent by patient age and region in which a patient’s CF centre was located (i.e. Europe or USA, Table 1). For the satellite taxa, again antibiotic exposure was the most significant factor along with, albeit to a lesser extent, %FEV1 (Table 3). Other significant clinical/demographic factors included patient age, patient sex, clinical status, CFTR genotype and geographic region. Notably, geographical distance between CF centres was a significant factor only for the satellite taxa, accounted for by three of six PCNM vectors.

Table 3 Redundancy analyses for determination of percent variation in the lung microbiota, core taxa and satellite taxa explained by significant clinical and geographical distance variables between centres
Full size table

Discussion

Chronic infection of the lower airways is undeniably polymicrobial, e.g. [8,9,10, 25, 26, 29], and remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for those living with CF [1,2,3]. However, current infection surveillance and infection control approaches in CF remain constrained by classical aerobic culture-based diagnostic microbiology; screening only for the presence or absence of a limited palette of targeted bacterial species [1, 2]. The unanswered question of how to translate a more complete understanding of the lower airway microbiota, which typically consists of bacterial taxa ranging from strict aerobes to obligate anaerobes, to novel treatment strategies, is a major reason why microbiome analysis is not yet employed in the clinical arena.

A pivotal step toward realising the full potential of microbiota information in the management of lower airway infection in CF is to understand the ecology of the lung microbiome [10, 13, 14], and identify ecological patterns of microbiota diversity in the disease as it progresses [15, 16]. Studies that either incorporate large cross-sectional cohorts from multiple CF centres and encompassing the high interpatient variability inherent in CF or in-depth longitudinal studies, which provide increased statistical power and clearer insight for further investigation, are therefore required. Using the former approach, we tested and confirmed a significant relationship between decreasing microbiota diversity and reduced lung function (Fig. 1). As such, that relationship can be considered as a generalised ecological pattern of CF microbiota (Fig. 1). Moreover, the loss of diversity was accompanied by an increase in dominance, which would also be a broader expected outcome when communities face environmental perturbations in ecological studies [27, 28]. When the pattern between lung function and diversity was observed as part of previous small cohort/single centre studies, it was characterised in each instance with low coefficient of determination values [8, 10, 17, 18]. This was also the case in the current study, and we posit that this results from high interpatient variability (Fig. 1) [10, 25, 26]. Subsequently, we stratified patients into lung disease categories, of increasing disease severity, to investigate further the relationships between microbiota characteristics and lung function, and the factors contributing to the variance in the microbiota.

We have previously established that the categorisation of microbiota into core and satellite taxa reveals important aspects of metacommunity species-abundance distributions that would be neglected without such a distinction [10, 30, 31]. A coherent metacommunity could be expected to exhibit a direct positive relationship between the prevalence and relative abundance of individual taxa across constituent communities [28]. Consistent with this prediction, the proportional abundance of bacterial OTUs in each lung disease category significantly correlated with the number of individual sample communities those taxa occupied (Fig. 2). Additionally, it should be expected that the core taxa would account for the majority of relative abundance and the rarer satellite taxa account for the majority of the diversity within a metacommunity [10, 30, 31]. This was the case in the current study, where the core taxa increasingly accounted for greater total relative abundance with increasing disease severity. Moreover, the high variability observed in microbiota diversity was reflected in the satellite taxa, but not in the core, indicating that the rarer taxa underpinned the observed variance in overall diversity (Fig. 3a). Conversely, increasing microbiota dominance patterns were mirrored by the abundant and prevalent core taxa (Fig. 3b), and core taxa composition was especially conserved in the severe category when compared to the other categories (Fig. 3c). In summary, changes in CF airway microbiota diversity and dominance follow predictions of the ecological theory, and that composition becomes more conserved with increasing selective pressure from harsher perturbations [27, 32]. In a CF context, the selective pressure on microbiota composition associated with worsening lung function may result from increased inflammation and intensified antibiotic therapy to treat chronic infection and recurrent exacerbations [22,23,24].

In general, it is understood that the common and prevalent core taxa contribute significantly to ecosystem function, carrying out the majority of functional activity, while the rare and infrequent satellite taxa can represent the influence of immigration and seedbank of diversity that can thrive and dominate when conditions change [10, 33]. If we consider bacterial pathogenesis as an ecological, albeit undesirable, function within the CF lung microbiome, then one would predict that recognised CF pathogens would be members of the abundant and prevalent core taxa, would contribute heavily to microbiota compositional similarity and would dominate the lung microbiota of many individual patients.

We found that this was not universally the case across our study group (Fig. 2 and Table S1). Derived from presence/absence culture screening data, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus are reported and recognised as dominant pathogens of concern in CF based on their prevalence [1, 34]. That was reflected here in terms of both the prevalence and relative abundance of the corresponding OTUs for those pathogens (Fig. 2 and Table S1). Conversely, B. cepacia complex, S. maltophilia, A. xylosoxidan, and Haemophilus influenzae are reported as being less prevalent, with culture positive reporting in < 20% of USA CF patients [1]. Here, OTUs identified as those pathogens all had greater prevalences than culture-based data, with B. cepacia complex and S. maltophilia found to be core taxa (Fig. 2 and Table S1). A probable reason for the higher prevalences is the increased sensitivity inherent in molecular-based approaches when compared to culture-based methods [7]. SIMPER analysis revealed that all recognised pathogen OTUs, with the exception of A. xylosoxidans, contributed substantially to the dissimilarity between lung disease categories (Table 2). In addition, the lung microbiota of individual patients became increasingly dominated by recognised pathogen OTUs, and especially by the P. aeruginosa OTU, in concert with decreasing lung function (Fig. 4). Again, A. xylosoxidans stood as an exception to this rule. Our findings, therefore, bring into question the perceived importance of this species in CF.

Conversely, other bacteria, but especially OTUs identified as belonging to genera comprised of obligate anaerobes, were observed to increasingly dominate microbiota of patients with better lung function (Fig. 4). Taxa belonging to the genera of Prevotella, Porphyromonas,and Veillonella, as observed here, have been previously associated with better clinical outcomes when they dominate lung microbiota [35]. Although defective mucociliary clearance in CF make it difficult to eradicate pathogenic bacteria, it might be possible to mitigate the effects of resident pathogens by promoting growth of bacterial taxa whose dominance is associated with better outcomes [11]. Reproducible infection models, such as CF specific air liquid interface cell cultures, might be used to identify paradigms to manage microbiota community structure [36]. Further, combining these paradigms with longitudinal patient studies might elucidate the underlying mechanisms that govern microbial diversity and dominance in the CF lung, and the role played by intensive antibiotic administration in the context of advancing lung disease [11].

While we established unambiguous relationships between lung microbiota characteristics (diversity, dominance and composition) and lung function, other clinical factors appear to contribute to the observed high interpatient variation. In particular, antibiotic exposure significantly explained variation in the composition of the microbiota and the core and satellite taxa groups (Table 3). This is unsurprising as most CF patients are throughout their lives frequently on some form of antibiotic treatment, ranging from eradication to chronic suppressive therapies [3, 34]. Here, all of the specific antibiotics that were significant in explaining variation in microbiota composition are administered to target specific recognised pathogens [34].

To a lesser extent, patient age and region (Europe or USA) also explained microbiota variance across the core and satellite taxa, and the whole microbiota (Table 3). Age has previously been found to weakly associate with microbiota characteristics, with fluctuations in diversity mainly happening in childhood [25, 26]. With regard to region, a possible explanation for the effect could relate to patient characteristics, which can vary according to country of treatment [37]. However, biogeographical influences may also be at play, with the local environment acting as a source of immigration for bacterial taxa found in a patient’s lower airways [37, 38]. Here we tested whether the geographical distance between participating CF centres significantly correlated with microbiota composition (Table 3). This questioned the biogeographical assumption that patients attending centres that are closer together have more similar microbiota than those that are further apart [38]. We found that this was not the case for the core taxa, but did significantly explain variation in the satellite taxa group which, as noted earlier, represents the influence of immigration in a community [33]. Interestingly, clinical status, defined as whether a patient was receiving treatment for pulmonary exacerbation or was judged clinically stable, was a significant factor for explaining variation in the satellite taxa but not the core taxa (or microbiota). This agrees with our previous work, which revealed core and satellite group compositions were resistant and resilient, respectively, to pulmonary exacerbation and antibiotics interventions [30]. Though not incorporated in the current study, measures of inflammatory markers and immune response could certainly account for variation within the infection microbiota and should be integrated into future studies of host-microbiota interactions in CF [35].

Conclusions

Establishing how best to utilise microbiota information in CF infection management offers great promise to further improve the lives of people living with CF. Translating the complexity of the lower airway microbiota into simplified yet clinically interpretable ecological metrics is a pragmatic way forward. Our findings, from a cohort of CF patients spanning a wide spectrum of lung disease and from different geographic regions indicate that microbiota diversity and dominance (as well as the identity of the dominant bacterial species), in combination with lung function measures (%FEV1), can be used as informative indicators of disease state. A recent study that focused on early end-stage lung disease (eESLD) in CF supports this view [39]; where eESLD patients were more likely to have low microbiota diversity dominated by specific recognised pathogens, including P. aeruginosa. More broadly, and given the high interpatient variability inherent in CF and found in this study, we recommend that microbiota sampling become part of routine microbial surveillance in the same manner that culture-based approaches are currently employed. This longitudinal surveillance of individual patients in a given CF centre would refine monitoring of changes in microbiota characteristics and lung function, and potentially improve personalised treatment of the disease.

Methods

Study design and subjects

Spontaneously expectorated sputum samples were provided from 299 adolescent to adult individuals with CF (one sample per patient), representing a broad cross-section CF respiratory disease, attending 13 CF centres in Europe and the USA (Table 1). The study was approved by either local research ethics committee (UK) or institutional review board (USA) (see Ethics approval and consent to participate section below). Each centre collected demographic and medical data on participating patients, including information on age, lung function, antibiotic use and other data (summarised in Table 1). All samples were stabilised at – 80 °C within 12 h of collection and freeze-thawing of samples kept within 3 cycles, to reduce introduction of bias as previously described [40, 41]. Two samples (COL0003 and COL0005) were excluded from the main analyses due to missing metadata, including %FEV1. Metadata is available at figshare.com under https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9848513.v1.

Targeted amplicon sequencing

Sputum samples were washed three times with 1X phosphate-buffered saline to remove saliva, to reduce potential bias from upper airway microbiota, as previously described [42]. DNA from dead or damaged cells, as well as extracellular DNA (which could bias final sequence analysis) was excluded from analysis via cross-linking with propidium monoazide prior to DNA extraction, as previously described [43]. Approximately 50 ng of template DNA was amplified using Q5® high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK), each with a unique dual-index barcode primer combination [44]. Individual PCR reactions employed 25 cycles of an initial 30 s, 98 °C denaturation step, followed by annealing phase for 30 s at 50 °C and final extension step lasting 60 s at 72 °C. Primers were based upon the universal primer sequence 27F and 338R [44]. An amplicon library consisting of ~ 300 bp amplicons spanning the V1-V2 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform using V3 chemistry at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridgeshire, UK. Mock communities, DNA extract and PCR negative controls were included in each sequencing run [45].

Sequence analysis

Sequenced paired-end reads were joined using PEAR [46], quality filtered using FASTX tools (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu). Chimeras were identified and removed with VSEARCH_UCHIME_REF [47] using Greengenes Release 13_5 [48]. Singletons were removed and the resulting sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence identity using VSEARCH_CLUSTER_FAST. Representative sequences were taxonomically assigned by RDP Classifier with the bootstrap threshold of 0.8 or greater using Greengenes Release 13_5 as a reference [48]. The raw sequence data reported in this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under study accession number PRJEB30646. From the 297 samples used, a total of 5,752,628 bacterial sequence reads (mean ± standard deviation per sample, 19,240 ± 17,233) were included in the final analysis, identifying 598 distinct bacterial OTUs to genus/species level. Given the length of the ribosomal sequences analysed, these identities should be considered putative.

Statistical analysis

Regression analysis, coefficients of determination (r2), degrees of freedom (df), F-statistic and significance (P) were calculated using XLSTAT v2018.1 (Addinsoft, Paris, France). Fisher’s alpha index of diversity was calculated in PAST v3.20 (http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past). This measure of diversity is relatively unaffected by variation in sample size, and completely independent if sequence reads per sample > 1000 [28]. The Berger-Parker index of dominance was calculated in PAST. This index is a measure of the numerical importance of the most abundant taxon in a given microbiota sample [28].

Recognised CF pathogens were those defined in the CF Foundation Patient Registry reporting [1]. Patients samples were stratified into lung disease categories following %FEV1 predicted classifications used in the CF Foundation Patient Registry reporting (mild/normal, %FEV1 ≥ 70%; moderate, 40–69% and severe, < 40%) [1]. Within each lung disease category, bacterial taxa were partitioned into core and satellite taxa groups, as previously described [31]. Based on a significant positive distribution-abundance relationship, the prevalent and abundant core taxa were defined as those present in more than 75% of samples, while taxa falling outside of the upper quartile were considered as satellite [30, 31].

Significant differences in diversity and dominance between groups were determined using Kruskal-Wallis analysis in conjunction with the post hoc Dunn test, and performed in XLSTAT. Additionally, effect sizes based on the comparisons of diversity or dominance were performed using Hedges’ d effect size measures, as described previously [43]. Sequence read data was percentage normalised for subsequent microbiota compositional-based analyses. The Bray-Curtis quantitative index of similarity was used for measures of microbiota compositional similarity throughout [28]. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with Bonferroni correction was used to test for significance in microbiota composition and performed in PAST. Similarity of percentages (SIMPER) analysis, to determine which taxa contributed most to compositional differences between groups, was performed in PAST. Direct ordination, by means of redundancy analysis (RDA), was used to relate variability in microbiota composition to clinical and demographic factors (Table 1) and geographical distance between CF centres. Principle coordinates of neighbour matrices (PCNM) were used as explanatory spatial variables [38] and were calculated from grid coordinates of the sites using GUSTA ME [49]. RDA was performed in CANOCO v5 [50]. Clinical/demographic variables and PCNM that significantly explained variation were determined with forward selection (999 Monte Carlo permutations with false discovery rate) and used in RDA [51]. Partial RDA was performed when both PCNM and clinical/demographic factors were significant to summarise the part of the microbiota variation explained by clinical/demographic factors after controlling the effects of geographic distance (PCNM) [51].

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequence data reported in this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under study accession number PRJEB30646. Clinical and demographic metadata has been deposited at figshare.com under https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9848513.v1.

Abbreviations

CF:

Cystic fibrosis

CFTR:

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

%FEV1 :

Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

SD:

Standard deviation of the mean

PERMANOVA:

Permutational multivariate analysis of variance

SIMPER:

Similarity of percentages

PCNM:

Principle coordinates of neighbour matrices

RDA:

Redundancy analysis

eESLD:

Early end-stage lung disease

References

  1. Anon. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry 2017 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, Maryland: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon. UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry Annual Data Report 2017. London: Cystic Fibrosis Trust; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bush A, Bilton D, Hodson M. Hodson and Geddes’ Cystic Fibrosis. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berger M. Inflammation in the lung in cystic fibrosis. A vicious cycle that does more harm than good? Clin Rev Allergy. 1991;9:119–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols D, Chmiel J, Berger M. Chronic inflammation in the cystic fibrosis lung: alterations in inter- and intracellular signaling. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2008;34:146–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Toole GA. Cystic fibrosis airway microbiome: overturning the old, opening the way for the new. J Bacteriol. 2018;200:e00561–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pattison SH, Rogers GB, Crockard M, Elborn JS, Tunney MM. Molecular detection of CF lung pathogens: current status and future potential. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12:194–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox MJ, Allgaier M, Taylor B, Baek MS, Huang YJ, Daly RA, et al. Airway microbiota and pathogen abundance in age-stratified cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers GB, Carroll MP, Serisier DJ, Hockey PM, Jones G, Bruce KD. Characterization of bacterial community diversity in cystic fibrosis lung infections by use of 16S ribosomal DNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5176–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Gast CJ, Walker AW, Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, Scott P, Daniels TW, et al. Partitioning core and satellite taxa from within cystic fibrosis lung bacterial communities. ISME J. 2011;5:780–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. LiPuma J. The new microbiology of cystic fibrosis: it takes a community. Thorax. 2012;67:851–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers GB, Hoffman LR, Carroll MP, Bruce KD. Interpreting infective microbiota: the importance of an ecological perspective. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:271–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Proctor L. What’s next for the human microbiome? Nature. 2019;569:623–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Einarsson GG, Zhao J, LiPuma JJ, Downey DG, Tunney MM, Elborn JS. Community analysis and co-occurrence patterns in airway microbial communities during health and disease. ERJ Open Res. 2019;5:00128–2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP, Ellis RJ, Firestone MK, Freckleton RP, et al. The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:384–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bell T, Ager D, Song J-I, Newman JA, Thompson IP, Lilley AK, et al. Larger islands house more bacterial taxa. Science. 2005;308:1884.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flight WG, Smith A, Paisey C, Marchesi JR, Bull MJ, Norville PJ, et al. Rapid detection of emerging pathogens and loss of microbial diversity associated with severe lung disease in cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2022.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zemanick ET, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Sagel SD, Stevens MJ, et al. Inflammation and airway microbiota during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies JC, Alton EW. Monitoring respiratory disease severity in cystic fibrosis. Respir Care. 2009;54:606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 Report. Respirology. 2017;22:575–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerem E, Reisman J, Corey M, Canny GJ, Levison H. Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenbluth DB, Wilson K, Ferkol T, Schuster DP. Lung function decline in cystic fibrosis patients and timing for lung transplantation referral. Chest. 2004;126:412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor-Robinson D, Whitehead M, Diderichsen F, Olesen HV, Pressler T, Smyth RL, et al. Understanding the natural progression in %FEV1 decline in patients with cystic fibrosis: a longitudinal study. Thorax. 2012;67:860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coburn B, Wang PW, Diaz Caballero J, Clark ST, Brahma V, Donaldson S, et al. Lung microbiota across age and disease stage in cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Ahrens Richard C, Chmiel JF, Clancy JP, et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700832.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ager D, Evans S, Li H, Lilley AK, Van Der Gast CJ. Anthropogenic disturbance affects the structure of bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12:670–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Petrosino JF, et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5809–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cuthbertson L, Rogers GB, Walker AW, Oliver A, Green LE, Daniels TWV, et al. Respiratory microbiota resistance and resilience to pulmonary exacerbation and subsequent antimicrobial intervention. ISME J. 2016;10:1081–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hedin C, van der Gast CJ, Rogers GB, Cuthbertson L, McCartney S, Stagg AJ, et al. Siblings of patients with Crohn’s disease exhibit a biologically relevant dysbiosis in mucosal microbial metacommunities. Gut. 2016;65:944–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. van der Gast CJ, Ager D, Lilley AK. Temporal scaling of bacterial taxa is influenced by both stochastic and deterministic ecological factors. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuhrman JA. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature. 2009;459:193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Elborn JS. Current approaches to the management of infection in cystic fibrosis. Curr Pediatr Rep. 2013;1:141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers GB, Zain NMM, Bruce KD, Burr LD, Chen AC, Rivett DW, et al. A novel microbiota stratification system predicts future exacerbations in bronchiectasis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Munye MM, Shoemark A, Hirst RA, Delhove JM, Sharp TV, McKay TR, et al. BMI-1 extends proliferative potential of human bronchial epithelial cells while retaining their mucociliary differentiation capacity. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2017;312:L258–L67.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, Klem ER, Lilley AK, Donaldson SH, Daniels TW, et al. Analysis of the bacterial communities present in lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis from American and British centers. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hazard C, Gosling P, van der Gast CJ, Mitchell DT, Doohan FM, Bending GD. The role of local environment and geographical distance in determining community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at the landscape scale. ISME J. 2012;7:498–508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Acosta N, Heirali A, Somayaji R, Surette MG, Workentine ML, Sibley CD, et al. Sputum microbiota is predictive of long-term clinical outcomes in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2018;73:1016–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cuthbertson L, Rogers GB, Walker AW, Oliver A, Hafiz T, Hoffman LR, et al. Time between collection and storage significantly influences bacterial sequence composition in sputum samples from cystic fibrosis respiratory infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:3011–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cuthbertson L, Rogers GB, Walker AW, Oliver A, Hoffman LR, Carroll MP, et al. Implications of multiple freeze-thawing on respiratory samples for culture-independent analyses. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14:464–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rogers GB, Carroll MP, Serisier DJ, Hockey PM, Jones G, Kehagia V, et al. Use of 16S rRNA gene profiling by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to compare bacterial communities in sputum and mouthwash samples from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2601–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rogers GB, Cuthbertson L, Hoffman LR, Wing PAC, Pope C, Hooftman DAP, et al. Reducing bias in bacterial community analysis of lower respiratory infections. ISME J. 2013;7:697–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dalby MJ, Aviello G, Ross AW, Walker AW, Barrett P, Morgan PJ. Diet induced obesity is independent of metabolic endotoxemia and TLR4 signalling, but markedly increases hypothalamic expression of the acute phase protein, SerpinA3N. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Buttigieg PL, Ramette A. A guide to statistical analysis in microbial ecology: a community-focused, living review of multivariate data analyses. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;90:543–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination. Ithaca: Microcomputer Power; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 2006;87:2614–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and staff at each of the contributing centres for their involvement, time and patience in sample collection. This study was supported by grants from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/H019456/1) and the Wellcome Trust (WT 098051). AWW receives core funding support from the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division. AA and GO received support from the Dartmouth Translational Research Core (CFF RDP STANTO15R0) for acquiring samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Leah Cuthbertson & J. Stuart Elborn

  2. Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

    Alan W. Walker

  3. Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK

    Alan W. Walker & Julian Parkhill

  4. NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK

    Anna E. Oliver

  5. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

    Geraint B. Rogers

  6. School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Geraint B. Rogers

  7. Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Damian W. Rivett

  8. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA

    Thomas H. Hampton, Alix Ashare & George A. O’Toole

  9. Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA

    Alix Ashare

  10. Adult Cystic Fibrosis Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

    J. Stuart Elborn

  11. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Institute for Health Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

    J. Stuart Elborn

  12. Institute of Cellular Medicine, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

    Anthony De Soyza

  13. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK

    Anthony De Soyza

  14. Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK

    Mary P. Carroll

  15. Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA

    Lucas R. Hoffman

  16. Departments of Pediatrics and Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Lucas R. Hoffman

  17. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle, UK

    Clare Lanyon

  18. Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Samuel M. Moskowitz

  19. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA

    Samuel M. Moskowitz

  20. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Julian Parkhill

  21. Pediatric Infectious Disease Division, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Paul J. Planet

  22. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Paul J. Planet

  23. Sackler Institute of Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA

    Paul J. Planet

  24. Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

    Charlotte C. Teneback

  25. School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

    Michael M. Tunney

  26. Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA

    Jonathan B. Zuckerman

  27. School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA

    Jonathan B. Zuckerman

  28. Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King’s College London, London, UK

    Kenneth D. Bruce

  29. Department of Life Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Christopher J. van der Gast

Authors
  1. Leah Cuthbertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan W. Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna E. Oliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geraint B. Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Damian W. Rivett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas H. Hampton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alix Ashare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Stuart Elborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anthony De Soyza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mary P. Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lucas R. Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Clare Lanyon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Samuel M. Moskowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. George A. O’Toole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Julian Parkhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Paul J. Planet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Charlotte C. Teneback
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Michael M. Tunney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Jonathan B. Zuckerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Kenneth D. Bruce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Christopher J. van der Gast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CJvdG, LC, AWW, AEO, GBR and KDB conceived the study. LC, AEO, AWW and JP were responsible for microbiota analysis. LC, CJvdG, THH and DWR performed sample analysis and statistical analysis. AA, JSE, ADS, MPC, LRH, CL, SMM, GAO, PJP, CCT, MMT and JBZ were responsible for sample collection, clinical care records and documentation. LC and CJvdG were responsible for the creation of the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to development of the final manuscript. CJvdG is guarantor of this work. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. van der Gast.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by either local research ethics committee (UK) or institutional review board (USA) as follows, with participating centre(s) then committee/board and approval number in parentheses: Bedford, and Lebanon, NH, USA (Geisel School of Medicine and Dartmouth College Institutional Review Board, CPHS # 23809); Belfast (Northern Ireland), Dublin (Ireland), Warsaw (Poland), London (UK) (Office for Research Ethics Northern Ireland, 06/NIR01/11); Boston, MA, USA (Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board, 2011P000620); Burlington, VT, USA (University of Vermont Institutional Review Board, M13-160); New York, NY, USA (Columbia University Institutional Review Board, IRB#AAAE8112); Newcastle, UK (County Durham and Tees Valley Research Ethics Committee, Res-11/NE/0291); Portland, ME, USA (Maine Medical Center Institutional Review Board, IRB # 4170); Seattle, WA, USA (Seattle Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board, IRB #12811) and Southampton, UK (Southampton and South West Hampshire Research Ethics Committee, 06/Q1704/26).

Competing interests

SMM is now an employee of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and may hold stock and/or stock options in that company. JP has a paid consultancy with Next Gen Diagnostics LLC. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Core taxa within each lung disease category. Given is prevalence, the number of samples a given core taxon was detected in, and average relative abundance across those samples. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) identifications have been used for bacterial taxon names. OTU numbers have been used to differentiate between taxa within the same genus. Given the length of the ribosomal sequences analysed, species identities should be considered putative.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Kruskal-Wallis summary statistics for testing for significant differences in diversity between lung function categories. Given for each test is the mean Fisher's alpha diversity index, standard deviation of the mean, H-statistic, and significance (P), and mean of ranks values. Asterisks denote significant differences in diversity following Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn test.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Kruskal-Wallis summary statistics for testing for significant differences in diversity between lung function categories. Given for each test is the mean Berger-Parker index of dominance, standard deviation of the mean, H-statistic, and significance (P), and mean of ranks values. Asterisks denote significant differences in diversity following Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn test.

Additional file 4: Figure S1.

Measures of Hedges’ d effect size based on comparisons of (A) diversity and (B) dominance in the microbiota, core taxa, and satellite taxa, when stratified into lung disease categories. Columns represent the effect size and error bars represent the standard error of effect size. Standard error bars that cross zero indicate no significant effect on diversity or dominance between lung disease categories. In each instance, within (A) positive effect sizes represent higher diversity in the second of the two lung disease categories being compared. Within (B) negative effect sizes represent lower dominance in the 2nd of the two lung disease categories being compared. Measures of diversity and dominance when stratified by lung disease category are presented in Fig. 3a and b, respectively.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

PERMANOVA summary statistics from testing for significant differences in microbiota composition between lung function categories. Given in each instance are mean Bray-Curtis similarity within and between categories (± standard deviation of the mean), F-statistic, and significance (P). Asterisks denote significant differences in composition following one-way PERMANOVA tests with Bonferroni correction.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cuthbertson, L., Walker, A.W., Oliver, A.E. et al. Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis. Microbiome 8, 45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00810-3

Keywords

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us