Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dynamics of rice microbiomes reveal core vertically transmitted seed endophytes

Microbiome volume 10, Article number: 216 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Plants and their associated microbiota constitute an assemblage of species known as holobionts. The plant seed microbiome plays an important role in nutrient uptake and stress attenuation. However, the core vertically transmitted endophytes remain largely unexplored.

Results

To gain valuable insights into the vertical transmission of rice seed core endophytes, we conducted a large-scale analysis of the microbiomes of two generations of six different rice varieties from five microhabitats (bulk soil, rhizosphere, root, stem, and seed) from four geographic locations. We showed that the microhabitat rather than the geographic location and rice variety was the primary driver of the rice microbiome assemblage. The diversity and network complexity of the rice-associated microbiome decreased steadily from far to near the roots, rice exterior to interior, and from belowground to aboveground niches. Remarkably, the microbiomes of the roots, stems, and seeds of the rice interior compartments were not greatly influenced by the external environment. The core bacterial endophytes of rice were primarily comprised of 14 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), 10 of which, especially ASV_2 (Pantoea) and ASV_48 (Xanthomonas), were identified as potentially vertically transmitted taxa because they existed across generations, were rarely present in exterior rice microhabitats, and were frequently isolated from rice seeds. The genome sequences of Pantoea and Xanthomonas isolated from the parental and offspring seeds showed a high degree of average nucleotide and core protein identity, indicating vertical transmission of seed endophytes across generations. In silico prediction indicated that the seed endophytes Pantoea and Xanthomonas possessed streamlined genomes with short lengths, low-complexity metabolism, and various plant growth-promoting traits. We also found that all strains of Pantoea and Xanthomonas exhibited cellulase activity and produced indole-3-acetic acid. However, most strains exhibited insignificant antagonism to the major pathogens of rice, such as Magnaporthe oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzae.

Conclusion

Overall, our study revealed that microhabitats, rather than site-specific environmental factors or host varieties, shape the rice microbiome. We discovered the vertically transmitted profiles and keystone taxa of the rice microbiome, which led to the isolation of culturable seed endophytes and investigation of their potential roles in plant-microbiome interactions. Our results provide insights on vertically transmitted microbiota and suggest new avenues for improving plant fitness via the manipulation of seed-associated microbiomes. 

Video Abstract

Background

Microorganisms are present in all stages of plant development. Healthy plant growth is dependent on homeostasis, which is largely maintained by three factors: environment, host genetics, and the microbiome [1]. Changes in stability may result in the emergence of plant diseases or maldevelopment. Plants and their associated microbiota act as a functional entity, known as the “holobiont” [2, 3]. Plant microbiota can be extracellular, intracellular, acquired from the environment, or inherited from the parent, which is called vertical transmission [4, 5]. The shaping of plant-associated microbiota is not stochastic but is determined by soil type, geographic location, host genotype, and plant compartments. All plant compartments can serve as microhabitats for diverse microorganisms to regulate holobiont fitness and resistance to environmental changes [2].

Seed, as a reproductive organ, represents an exclusive niche for a unique microbiota that harbors various adaptations for successful colonization [6]. Seed-associated microbes play roles in nutrient intake and reduction of abiotic and biotic stress [7]. Bacterial isolates from plant seeds can solubilize phosphorus, fix nitrogen, produce growth hormones, and synthesize antimicrobial compounds [8, 9]. The conserved beneficial features of seed microbiota reflect the possible requirement of host seeds for a protective layer [6]. Seed endophytes are of particular interest among seed-associated microbes because some can accompany plants throughout their life cycle, from germination to development, growth, and fruiting [7, 10, 11] as well as during postharvest storage and processing [12,13,14]. Particularly, seed core endophytes coevolve with their hosts as a “continuity of partnership” and develop a robust and efficient transmission strategy over generations [11, 15, 16]. Therefore, in-depth analysis of the composition of the seed core endophytic microbiota will be useful not only for systematically understanding the coevolutionary mechanism of holobionts but also for the mining, development, and utilization of functional microbial resources.

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a model plant and a staple crop worldwide. Several pioneering studies have attempted to characterize the taxonomic profiles of rice-associated microbiota, define the core microbiota of the rice rhizosphere and seed, and infer the driving factors shaping the rice microbial community [17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, there is limited data on the changes in seed endophytic microbiome different compartments of rice. Little is known about species- or strain-level transmission patterns across generations. To address these issues and gain valuable insights into the vertical transmission of rice seed core endophytes, we conducted a large-scale analysis of the microbiomes of two generations of six different rice varieties from five microhabitats (bulk soil, rhizosphere, root, stem, and seed) at four geographic locations. Our findings revealed that 14 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) distributed in 12 known genera and one unclassified genus coexisted throughout the life cycle of rice, regardless of rice variety, microhabitat, or geographic location. Among the core microbial groups, 10 ASVs, including ASV_2 of Pantoea with three species and ASV_48 of Xanthomonas with one species, were the most abundant vertically transmittable bacteria within the seed endotypes. Moreover, the genome sequences of Pantoea and Xanthomonas isolated from the parental seed and offspring seeds showed a high degree of average nucleotide identity and core protein identity, indicating the vertical transmission of seed endophytes across generations. Additionally, we determined the plant growth-promoting and plant protection-associated features of the isolates via in silico prediction and experimental tests.

Results

Quality metrics of sequencing analysis

To comprehensively explore the structure and community composition of the rice-associated microbiota, we first grew three indica and three japonica varieties in Nanchang (NC) to harvest the parental seeds and then grew these seeds in four geographic locations, Sanya (SY), Langfang (LF), Nanchang (NC), and Xishuangbanna (XB), to examine their microbiomes (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Total DNA from the bulk soil, rhizosphere, root, stem, and seed samples was extracted, amplified using primers for the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and sequenced as described in the “Materials and methods” section (Fig. 1a). We generated 249,443,008 raw reads with an average merged read length of 379 bp from 481 samples (20 bulk soil, 107 rhizosphere, 117 root, 106 stem, and 131 seed samples) (Supplementary Table 1). After quality trimming and removal of chimeric and plant reads, we obtained 24,504,476 high-quality reads that were assigned to 26,646 bacterial ASVs (Supplementary Table 2). Moreover, 16S rRNA ASVs were assigned to 28 bacterial phyla and 929 genera (Supplementary Table 2). Rarefaction analysis indicated that our sequencing was sufficient to reveal the true diversity of the samples (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Alpha diversity of rice-associated microbiomes. a Samples were collected from five microhabitats. Bulk, bulk soil; rhizo, rhizosphere; root, root endosphere; stem, stem endosphere; seed, offspring seed endosphere; seed-P, parental seed endosphere. n represents the sample numbers. b and c Chao1 and Shannon index of the microbiota of bulk soil from four regions. SY, Sanya; LF, Langfang; NC, Nanchang; XB, Xishuangbanna. Horizontal bars within boxes represent medians. Tops and bottoms of boxes represent the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA and T-test. Lower letters represent the statistical differences at the 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05). d and g Chao1 and Shannon index of the microbiota of different microhabitats from the six rice varieties aggregated from four regions. ns represents no statistical difference based on the T-test (p < 0.05). e and h Chao1 and Shannon index of the microbiota of different microhabitats from six rice varieties aggregated from four regions. Means with the same letters are not statistically different based on the T-test (p < 0.05). f and i Chao1 and Shannon index of the microbiota of different microhabitats collected from all the rice varieties and regions. Means with the same letters are not statistically different based on the T-test (p < 0.05). The indices (F and p-value) are displayed at the bottom of each graph

Full size image

Diversity and driving factors of rice microbiomes

To evaluate the diversity of the rice-associated microbiomes, α-diversity (abundance and richness, Chao1 index; diversity and evenness, Shannon index) was calculated at the ASV level across samples grouped into different varieties, microhabitats, and locations. First, we investigated the microbiomes and physicochemical properties of bulk soil samples from four distinct locations to elucidate the basic effects of geographic environments on the microbial community. Remarkably, the α-diversity metrics (Chao1 and Shannon indices) revealed a significant difference in microbial composition among locations, wherein LF and NC had higher abundance and diversity than SY and XB (Chao1, p < 0.001; Shannon, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 b and c; Supplementary Table 3). We tested 12 physicochemical properties for all of the bulk soil samples and observed distinct profiles, indicating that the four locations had significant differences in soil fertility (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Redundancy analysis (RDA) indicated that environmental factors significantly shaped the soil microbial communities (permutation test: p = 0.005). Two dimensions (RDA1 and RDA2) explained 70.26% of the changes in the soil bacterial community (Supplementary Fig. 1c). The main contributors to these differences were soil ammonium nitrogen (A-N; p < 0.0001) and total potassium (TK; p < 0.0001). LF and NC had significantly higher soil nitrate nitrogen (NO-N) concentrations, whereas XB had higher concentrations of soil organic matter (OM), organic carbon (OC), and total carbon (TC) (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

Next, we sought to determine the factors that drive the rice microbiome assemblage. We found that the rhizosphere, root, stem, and seed endophytic microbiomes of a single rice variety did not show any significant differences in the α-diversity indices at the same location (Supplementary Fig. 3). Furthermore, there were no differences in the α-diversity indices across the six rice varieties in the rhizosphere, root, stem, or seed endophytic microbiomes from the four locations (Fig. 1 d and g; Supplementary Table 3), indicating that the microbial diversity was typically independent of the rice variety. However, for both individual rice varieties and aggregates of the six varieties, the α-diversity indices of the rhizosphere microbiomes exhibited considerable heterogeneity among the four locations (Fig. 1 e and h, Supplementary Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 3). The trend of the overall α-diversity indices of the rhizosphere microbiomes from the four locations was similar to that in the bulk soil, implying that the rhizosphere microbial diversity was influenced by geographic location. In contrast to the bulk soil and rhizosphere, the endophytic microbial diversity of stems, roots, and seeds among the four locations had varied profiles (Fig. 1 e and h; Supplementary Table 3), suggesting that environmental or external influences had little impact on the internal microbial diversity of rice. Notably, the microbial α-diversity indices of various plant compartments decreased significantly in the rhizosphere, roots, stems, and seeds, regardless of grouping by rice variety, geographic location, or as the entire collection (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 f and I; Supplementary Table 3). These results suggest that the microhabitat, rather than the geographic location or rice variety, is the primary determinant of microbial diversity.

To support our claim, we performed principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) to investigate the internal correlations between these variables (Fig. 2). PCoA demonstrated a significant separation and distribution of the rice microbiomes along the rhizosphere, roots, stems, and seeds (R2 = 0.314, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a), rather than the geographic locations (R2 = 0.0967, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b) and rice varieties (R2 = 0.0106, p = 0.478) (Fig. 2c). Remarkably, the seed endophytic pattern of the progeny overlapped significantly with that of the parents (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity revealed that the bulk soil microbiomes formed four distinct clusters when colored based on the geographic location (R2 = 0.710, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2d). Despite this, the microbiomes from diverse microhabitats characterized by location began to converge along the rhizosphere, roots, stems, and seeds and overlapped substantially in stems and seeds (Fig. 2 e–h). Taken together, our findings demonstrated that microhabitat was the primary driver of rice microbiome assemblage. Diversity of the rice-associated microbiome declined steadily from far to near the roots, from rice exterior to interior, and from belowground to aboveground niches.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Beta diversity patterns of rice-associated microbiomes. a Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) with Bray-Curtis distances of microbial communities unconstrained by microhabitat, region, and rice variety. PCo-1 and PCo-2 show the first and second components of the PCoA analysis, respectively. b PCoA of microbial communities in each microhabitat among the four regions. Regions are highlighted by ellipse and point shape. Significance of the microbial community dissimilarities among different groups is based on PERMANOVA tests. Indices (F, R2, and p-value) are displayed at the bottom of each graph

Full size image

Taxonomic composition and dynamics of rice microbiota

We examined the enrichment and taxonomic differences among rice microbiomes under diverse conditions. The data in Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 4, and Supplementary Table 4 reveal that all taxa at various levels were enriched in or depleted in the rice microbiomes. Although β-Proteobacteria was the most prevalent bacterial class, accounting for > 20% of the ASVs in each bulk soil samples, the four geographic locations had distinct microbial patterns (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 4). In the SY bulk soil, β-Proteobacteria accounted for 57.9% of the ASVs, followed by other classes with < 10% percentage (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 4). In contrast, Actinobacteria was widely distributed in LF and XB, accounting for the second (19.4% of the ASVs) and third (13.3% of the ASVs) most abundant classes in these two locations, respectively, whereas Verrucomicrobia subdivision 3 was abundant in the NC bulk soil, accounting for 12.2% of the ASVs (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 4). The bacterial class taxonomic distributions in the rhizosphere were similar to those in the bulk soil at each location. For example, β-Proteobacteria remained the most common class (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 4). Some classes, on the other hand, were enriched or depleted from the bulk soil to the rhizosphere (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 4). In particular, the proportion of γ-Proteobacteria in the rhizosphere increased relative to that in the bulk soil at each location, but the proportion of Actinobacteria in the rhizosphere showed the opposite trend (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Taxonomic composition of the rice microbiome in each microhabitat. a Histograms of class abundances present in bulk soil (bulk), rhizosphere (Rhizo), root endosphere (root), stem endosphere (stem), offspring seed endosphere (seed), and parental seed endosphere (seed-P). b Schematic diagram of the top 5 classes of microbiota in each rice compartment. c Relative abundances of the most prevalent genera in different microhabitats. d Schematic diagram of the top 5 genera of microbiota in each rice compartments

Full size image

These alterations were also observed throughout the collection (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Table 4). Remarkably, γ-Proteobacteria was the only class that was enriched progressively, whereas a few classes, including Actinobacteria, α-Proteobacteria, and β-Proteobacteria, were depleted in the bulk soil, rhizosphere, stems, and seeds (Fig. 3 a and b; Supplementary Table 4), indicating that aboveground and rice interior niches are more favorable for γ-Proteobacteria survival than the survival of other bacterial classes. Consequently, Pantoea and Xanthomonas, two representative genera of γ-Proteobacteria, became more dominant, whereas Sphingomonas from α-Proteobacteria and Acidovorax from β-Proteobacteria became less dominant from the bulk soil to the seed (Fig. 3 c and d; Supplementary Table 4). Moreover, the top five classes or genera in the diverse microhabitats of microbiomes presented dynamic changes, and γ-Proteobacteria and Pantoea emerged as the most dominant class and genus, respectively, in the offspring seeds (Fig. 3). These findings are consistent with the above observation that microbial abundance and diversity tend to decrease from the bulk soil to the seeds (Fig. 1).

Bacterial co-occurrence networks and keystone taxa

To further characterize the effects of the complex interactions between bacterial taxa and the microhabitat on rice microbiomes, particularly in endophytes, we assessed the co-occurrence patterns of bacterial communities along the soil-seed continuum. Overall, the network complexity substantially decreased from the rhizosphere to the roots, stems, and seeds (Fig. 4). However, the modularity indices of the bulk soil, rhizosphere, and root were larger (> 0.4) than those of the stem, seed, and parental seed (< 0.4), suggesting that the belowground and root-associated microbiomes had more typical module structures than the aboveground and rice endophytes (Fig. 4). Remarkably, the number of nodes, number of edges, average degree, modularity, and average clustering coefficient were the highest in the rhizosphere, suggesting a highly structured, strongly correlated, and complex network with the most links (Fig. 4). In contrast, offspring seeds had the lowest numbers of nodes and edges, average degree, and average clustering coefficient, indicating a weakly correlated and dispersed network with a few links (Fig. 4). The parental seeds (seed-P) were collected only from NC, which may have resulted in higher topological features than those of the offspring seeds. In the networks, the ratio of positive to negative connections (edges) gradually decreased from the rhizosphere (5.1) to the seed (1.0), indicating more competitive connections in the microhabitat of seeds. Thus, the microhabitats had marked effects on the microbial network.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Temporal dynamics of microbial networks. a Co-occurrence and mutual exclusion relationships among rice-associated microbiomes across the soil-plant continuum. SparCC algorithm was used to calculate the network at ASV level (abundance > 0.01%) with p < 0.05. Each node represents a single ASV, and hub nodes are indicated in cyan. Color of edges indicates the type of the interaction. Red, positive or co-occurrence; blue, negative or mutual exclusion. b Major topological properties of co-occurrence networks of each microhabitat. Detailed data is presented in Supplementary Table 5

Full size image

Microbial communities usually harbor keystone taxa that can be computationally identified as hubs (module hubs and connectors) based on the within-module degree (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi) of ASVs in the networks [23]. Overall, 40 connectors and 13 module hubs were detected in all networks (Supplementary Fig. 5; Supplementary Table 5). Bulk soil and rhizosphere networks had higher numbers of hub nodes, with 17 and 16 hub nodes, respectively, whereas the number of hub nodes successively decreased to six and three in the networks of offspring seeds and parental seeds (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Table 5). Proteobacteria was the dominant keystone taxon in each network, representing 81.25%, 78.57%, and 71.43% of the total hubs in the bulk soil, rhizosphere, and roots, respectively (Supplementary Table 6). Furthermore, all keystone taxa of stems and seeds were classified as Proteobacteria (Supplementary Table 6), indicating the importance of Proteobacteria in the rice interior compartments. Although the seeds had a relatively low number of hub nodes, their highest betweenness centrality indicated the importance of the nodes for network stability and structure (Supplementary Table 5).

Core rice endophytic microbiota

Although the rice microbiome exhibited dynamic changes depending on the conditions, core microbiome members were ubiquitously present in rice, regardless of the impact of external factors. To elucidate the core microbiome of the rice endosphere, we examined data collected from various locations, rice varieties, and microhabitats. We found that 438, 94, and 27 ASVs were common (70% occurrence) in the collected samples of root, stem, and offspring seed samples, respectively (Fig. 5a). Among these, 10% of the ASVs from roots overlapped with those from stems, and the shared ASV number (42) was 44.7% in stems. Subsequently, 20% of the ASVs from stems overlapped with those from offspring seeds, and the shared ASV number (18) was 66.7% in the offspring seeds. In total, 14 ASVs were identified in all three endophytic rice compartments and were therefore defined as members of the rice core endophytic microbiota, accounting for 51.9% of the ASVs in offspring seeds and were distributed across two phyla, spanning six orders and 13 genera (Fig. 5a; Supplementary Table 7). The most abundant phylum and order of the core endophytes were Proteobacteria and Enterobacterales, accounting for 12 and five ASVs, respectively (Supplementary Table 7). Therefore, we presumed that the shape of the core endophytic microbiome is not completely random. It is partly affected by bacterial properties, host environmental, and metabolic features.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Core rice endophytic microbiota and vertically transmitted taxa. a Venn diagram showing that 14 ASVs that coexist in the rice endosphere compartments (root, stem, and offspring seed) at a frequency threshold of 70%. b Venn diagram showing that 10 ASVs that are vertically transmitted from the parental seeds (seed-P) to the offspring rice endosphere (endo) at a frequency threshold of 100%. Taxonomy of the ASVs is listed in Supplementary Table 7. c Absolute abundance of 10 vertical transmission ASVs in each microhabitat. Sequencing number in ASV table was summed up on microhabitat level with every single replicates. Y-axis was log transformed, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA, Brown-Forsythe, and Welch tests. Letters represent the statistical differences at the 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05). Detailed data is presented in Supplementary Table 7.

Full size image

Evidence for the vertical transmission of seed endophytes

To identify the potential vertically transmitted microbiota, we identified the overlapping ASVs between the core endophytic microbiota and the parental seed endophytes. We observed 10 ASVs overlapping between the two groups, and they were assigned to nine genera, which suggests the possible occurrence of inheritance across generations of rice core endophytes (Fig. 5b). Among these, shared ASVs accounted for 71.4% of the core rice endophytic taxa. Remarkably, the absolute abundances and occurrence frequency of ASV_2 (Pantoea), ASV_26 (Pseudomonas), ASV_48 (Xanthomonas), and ASV_238 (o_Enterobacterales, unclassified genus) in the root, stem, and parental and offspring seeds were significantly higher than those in the bulk soil and rhizosphere (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 6). This result suggests that these four ASVs are most likely to be the vertically transmitted taxa. We demonstrated that only a few specific microorganisms were transmitted, indicating that a filtering process occurred during the transmission [14, 24].

To obtain the vertically transmitted taxa, we performed high-throughput isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from seeds. Collectively, we obtained 957 bacterial isolates from the parental and offspring seeds of two rice varieties (PA64 and Dular) harvested from four different geographic locations (Fig. 6a). The 16S rRNA gene sequencing and analysis showed that the isolates were assigned to three phyla, five classes, and 12 genera (Fig. 6b). Pantoea and Xanthomonas were the two most abundant genera, representing 39.39% and 27.69% of all the isolates, respectively (Fig. 6b). The 16S rRNA gene sequences of 21 Pantoea and 27 Xanthomonas strains were identical to those of ASV_2 and ASV_48, respectively (Fig. 6b). Among them, nine Pantoea and 17 Xanthomonas strains were isolated from the offspring seeds, and the rest were from the parental seeds (Fig. 6 c and e). We performed draft genome sequencing of these bacteria to explore their shared identities. The average genome sizes of the Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains were 5.07 and 4.84 Mb, respectively (Supplementary Table 8). ANI and core genome phylogenetic analysis of Pantoea isolates with type strains indicated that the isolates belonged to three species: P. ananatis, P. dispersa, and P. stewartia (Fig. 7a; Supplementary Fig. 7a). Similarly, all Xanthomonas isolates were classified into one species, X. sacchari (Fig. 7b; Supplementary Fig. 7b). Overall, all eight Pantoea strains from the offspring seeds showed ≥ 98.9% ANI and ≥ 99.3% concatenated core genome identity with the nine strains from the parental seeds (Fig. 6 c and d). Notably, P. ananatis JT8-6 from the offspring seeds of Dular exhibited a 100% ANI with P. ananatis JT1-188 from the parental seeds of PA14. Among the Xanthomonas isolates, four strains (JT6-9-1, LT6-16-1, JT6-1-1, and LT5-3) from the offspring seeds had ≥ 97.9% ANI with four strains (JR3-14, JRV3-2, JT1-22, and LR2-11) from the parental seeds (Fig. 6e). Furthermore, the four offspring strains showed ≥ 98.0% concatenated core genome identity with JRV3-2 and JT1-22 (Fig. 6f). The extremely high identity between the isolates from parental and offspring seeds suggests the vertical transmission of seed endophytes at the strain level.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Identification of culturable vertically transmitted rice seed endophytes. a Number of culturable bacteria from parental (P) and offspring (O) seeds of two rice varieties (Dular and P64) harvested from four regions (SY, LF, NC, and XB). b Circular representation of the proportional structure of bacterial strains at genus level associated with the isolation groups listed in a. Visualization was rendered using the open-source software Circos. c Heatmap of reciprocal average nucleotide identity (ANI) of the Pantoea isolated from parental (P_) and offspring seeds (O_). ANIs were calculated using FastANI. Colored boxes indicate similarities scaled from low (blue) to high (red). d Heatmap of reciprocal concatenated core genome identity of the Pantoea isolated from parental (P_) and offspring seeds (O_). Analysis was based on reciprocal global alignment of concatenated 2505 single-copy gene sets of the 21 Pantoea strains. Colored boxes indicate similarities scaled from low (blue) to high (red). e Heatmap of reciprocal ANIs of the Xanthomonas isolated from parental (P_) and offspring seeds (O_). Annotation is the same as in e. f Heatmap of reciprocal concatenated core genome identity of the Xanthomonas isolated from parental (P_) and offspring seeds (O_). The analysis was based on reciprocal global alignment of concatenated 2508 single-copy genes sets of the 27 strains of Xanthomonas strains. Colored boxes indicate similarities scaled from low (blue) to high (red)

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Phylogenetic analysis and characterization of vertically transmitted rice seed endophytes. a Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 21 isolates of Pantoea with 20 type strains based on the concatenated multiple alignment of the 1258 single-copy orthologous genes. Shimodaira-Hasegawa test support values (percentage of 1000 replications) greater than 75% were indicated at branching nodes. Selected biosynthetic, secretion system-related and catabolic genes or gene clusters were predicted using the genome sequences of the Pantoea isolates. b Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 27 isolates of Xanthomonas with 22 type strains based on the concatenated multiple alignment of the 892 single-copy orthologous genes. Selected biosynthetic, secretion system-related, and catabolic genes or gene clusters were predicted using the genome sequences of the Xanthomonas isolates. SM, secondary metabolites; PSS, protein secretion systems; ENZ, digestive enzymes. Dark green and brown boxes represent the presence and absence of a gene or gene cluster within a genome, respectively. The bootstrap values greater than 80 are not displayed

Full size image

Genome mining and phenotypic characterization of vertically transmitted seed endophytes

To elucidate the potential functions of the vertically transmitted taxa, we performed genome-mining analysis of all of the sequenced endophytic Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains. We calculated the number of pan and core genes in Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains, respectively. There were 3091 and 2627 core genes in isolated Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains, respectively, with the pan genes accounting for 26.8–39.8% of the whole genome (Supplementary Fig. 8 a and c). The pan-genome accumulation curves with the heaps law model index indicated an open-pan genome among Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains (Supplementary Fig. 8 b and d). The large number of core genes derived from pan-genome analysis prompted us to look at their functional classification to obtain clues for vertical transmission characteristics. The core genomes of Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains were then annotated using the Clusters of Orthologous Genes (COG) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) databases, and we found that the E (amino acid transport and metabolism) and G (carbohydrate transport and metabolism) terms were distinctively enriched in COG annotation in both Pantoea and Xanthomonas core genomes and highly correlated with the top 2 KEGG annotated terms “Carbohydrate_metabolism” and “Amino_acid_metabolism” (Supplementary Fig. 9). Subsequently, we divided these characteristics into three categories: secondary metabolites, protein secretion systems, and enzymes (Fig. 7). In silico prediction revealed that all Pantoea strains contained plant growth promotion-associated genes encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase and indoleacetamide hydrolase (iaaH) (Fig. 7a). Moreover, all Pantoea strains possessed genes encoding various digestive enzymes, such as dextranase, β-galactosidase, pectinase, cellulase, and amylase (Fig. 7a). All the Pantoea strains had a type 1 secretion system (T1SS), T5aSS and T6SS, whereas only a few strains had T2SS, T3SS, T4SS, T5bSS, and T5cSS (Fig. 7a). Although the three species of Pantoea had distinct patterns of secondary metabolites, the overall metabolite profile generated by antiSMASH was fairly rare and was composed primarily of iron chelation-associated desferrioxamine, aerobactin, turnerbactin, and pyoverdine rather than the antimicrobial biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Xanthomonas strains also had the iaaH gene and abundant digestive enzyme-encoding genes for β-galactosidase, amylase, and pectinase (Fig. 7b). However, the isolated Xanthomonas strains only contained only T1SS, T4SS, and T5SS rather than the pathogenic (type strain) T3SS and T6SS (Fig. 7b). The isolated strains had a very limited secondary metabolite profile, which consisted merely of a siderophore-like xanthoferrin and an inconclusive teixobactin, while the type strains mostly contained lankacidi and xanthomonadin (Fig. 7b). The small genomes and streamlined metabolism of Pantoea and Xanthomonas may assist in the adaptation to life in the rice seed interior compartment.

To determine whether the vertically transmissible isolates truly possessed plant growth-promoting properties, we determined a few representative characteristics of the selected strains of Pantoea and Xanthomonas (Supplementary Table 9). We found that all the strains had cellulase activity and produced indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which corresponded to the results of genome mining. Additionally, we tested the phosphorus solubilization activity and found that most of the strains, including Pantoea and Xanthomonas, could solubilize inorganic and organic phosphates. We also assessed whether Pantoea and Xanthomonas could antagonize the major pathogens of rice diseases, such as Magnaporthe oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzae. However, we were unable to observe the growth inhibition of the two rice pathogens by most of the bacterial strains, except for five Pantoea strains that showed moderate antagonistic activity, which can be explained by the rare antimicrobial metabolites predicted by genome mining.

Discussion

Stable plant-microbe interactions are contingent on continuous coexistence over generations [25, 26]. Seed endophytes are of particular interest because they can be transmitted from parent to progeny [1, 7]. To identify the core vertically transmitted taxa of the rice microbiome, we collected and determined the microbiome from five microhabitats of six rice varieties with two generations from four geographic locations (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Our results demonstrated that the rice microbiome was largely shaped by the microhabitats rather than the site-dependent environmental factors and host varieties. We further showed that rice compartments had a strong and direct effects on endophytic bacterial diversity and network complexity, with the selection pressure sequentially enhanced, and the taxa gradually filtered and enriched from the rice exterior to interior and from belowground to aboveground niches. This could be explained by other findings or hypotheses regarding intensive selection pressures caused by the host immune system and physical and biochemical barriers in the plant interior compartments [27,28,29]. By analyzing over two successive generations, we identified the vertically transmission profile and keystone taxa of the rice microbiome using multiple bioinformatic methods, facilitating the isolation of culturable seed endophytes and exploration of their potential functions in plant-microbiome interactions. These findings provide comprehensive and empirical evidence for the predicted vertical transmission of the seed endophytic microbiome and coevolution of the host and microbes.

A point worth highlighting is the dynamic change in the β- and γ-Proteobacteria abundance between the rice exterior and interior microhabitats (Fig. 3). β-Proteobacteria, which were widely distributed and abundant in the bulk soil and rhizosphere in our study, represented specific taxa that were better adapted to natural environments, where they were involved in nutrient cycling, including the regulation cycles of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), iron (Fe), and sulfur levels (S) [30,31,32,33,34]. In roots, stems, and seeds, γ-Proteobacteria became the most dominant taxa, and Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae within γ-Proteobacteria were significantly enriched in plant interior compartments (Supplementary Table 7). Further metagenomic studies can shed more light on the seed microbiome and provide a better understanding of the endophytic microbiota present in seeds with regard to both the taxa and their phenotypic characteristics. At the genus level of classified taxa, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Citrobacter were constant inhabitants e in the rice endosphere with high abundance (Fig. 3) and were capable of fixing atmospheric nitrogen, producing phytohormones that benefit plant growth, and modulating host fitness, pathogen suppression, and plant tolerance to stress [35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Among the genera of γ-Proteobacteria, the proportions of Pantoea and Xanthomonas tended to increase the fastest from roots to seeds, and Pantoea had a strong predominance (78.4%) in seeds. Ferreira et al. reported that a gfp-labeled Pantoea strain could colonize the embryo and move into the intercellular spaces of the root and interior of the stem xylem vessels [42]. Besides, Johnston-Monje and Raizada (2011) showed that a gfp-labeled seed-borne Pantoea strain injected into the stem of maize plants was able to move systemically through the vascular tissues and was present in the metaxylem vessels [43]. Together, our findings on vertically transmitted taxa from the core rice endophytes supported the hypothesis that these taxa remained inside the seed to be spread evenly through plant growth or move within the plant tissue [44].

Culture collection of rice seed endophytes represented most of the vertically transmitted taxa, including the dominant genera Pantoea and Xanthomonas. Pantoea is considered an endophytic genus in various plant hosts as described above and in other studies [45,46,47,48]. Although some species of Pantoea can cause plant diseases [49], many studies have demonstrated that Pantoea species are mostly mutualists or commensals, rather than pathogens [25, 48, 50]. However, Xanthomonas species are usually recognized as plant pathogens that obligately rely on the T3SS and T6SS to cause diseases in hundreds of plant species [51,52,53]. Recently, a whole-genome analysis of type strains and completely sequenced genomes of Xanthomonas spp. revealed that Xanthomonas sacchari was the only species that did not rely on T3SS and T6SS [52]. X. sacchari, coincidentally, was the vertically transmitted endophytic Xanthomonas species discovered in our study. Intriguingly, we found that both Pantoea and Xanthomonas isolated from seeds carried some common features via in silico prediction. Seed-borne Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains had streamlined genomes (< 5 Mb) and simplified metabolism, with scarce antimicrobial compounds and few protein secretion systems (Fig. 6 d and h; Supplementary Table 8). It is reasonable to assume that the seed interior compartment is a restricted and invariant reservoir in which endophytes maintain the greatest fitness and evolutionary success with the lowest metabolic costs [1, 24, 54]. We noticed that all the isolates encoded plant cell wall-degrading enzymes, such as cellulase and pectinase, which were important for colonizing seeds, spreading systemically, and ultimately reaching the fruits and offspring seeds [55, 56]. The strains of the two genera also possessed amylase homologs, which use starch and resume growth after long-term survival inside seeds [57]. In addition to the characteristics that benefit their own survival, the isolates produce plant growth-promoting substances such as auxins and ACC deaminase, which enable the plant to pass bacteria with beneficial characteristics to their offspring [11, 58]. Phosphorus is one of the most limited but critical plant growth nutrients, primarily present in insoluble forms, and phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria play a critical role in converting phosphorus to available forms [59]. Most of the Pantoea and Xanthomonas isolates exhibited significant phosphate-solubilizing activity, which suggests the potency of the nutrient conversion capacity of the vertically transmitted seed endophytes. Although a few antimicrobial BGCs were discovered in the isolates, a chemically diverse set of siderophores was also present in the genomes, which compete with the pathogens for iron [41, 60, 61]. All of these findings highlight the significance of the core seed microbiota in ensuring the best-matching microbial symbionts for the next generation. Further genomic and genetic investigation of vertically transmitted rice endophytes should be carried out to unravel the molecular mechanisms contributing to their colonization, association, and coevolution with hosts.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that the influence of microhabitat on rice-associated microbiota is greater than that of plant variety and soil type in some cases. Identification of the core endophytes, network hubs, and vertically transmitted microbiota provides critical information and lays a theoretical foundation for developing an effective strategy for the future manipulation of seed-associated microbiomes to improve the plant fitness. Remarkably, attractive characteristics such as streamlined genomes and low-complexity metabolic networks of seed endophytes can be exploited in the adaptation of cell factory systems or chassis cells for agricultural, industrial, and environmental applications.

Materials and methods

Experimental setup and sampling

In 2016, six rice cultivars (RBQ, L31, M63, P64, Dular, and Kasalath) were bred in Nanchang (NC), Jiangxi, China (115°57′ 34″ E, 28°33′ 9″ N), and seeds were collected as the parental generation. The seeds were harvested and planted in four regions in China: Sanya (SY), Hainan (109°30′ 28″ E, 18°15′ 15″ N), Langfang (LF), Hebei (116°36′ 8″ E, 39°30′ 28″ N), NC and Xishuangbanna (XB), and Yunnan (100°47′ 25″ E, 21°59′ 47″ N). Each area had five replicates, and each replicate contained a section of 19.5 m2 (3 m × 6.5 m). Samples were collected from five microhabitats: bulk soil (bulk), rhizosphere (Rhizo), root endosphere (root), stem endosphere (stem), and seed endosphere (seed). The “S”-shaped sampling method was used to collect 10 cm bulk soil [62]. Rice roots were cut with sterile scissors, and the 1–2-mm-thick soil layer surrounding the root was defined as the rhizosphere soil. Rhizosphere soil was collected via centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min and stored at −80 °C and 4 °C for further processing, respectively.

The soil total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (A-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO-N), available nitrogen (K-N), organic matter (OM), total potassium (TK), available potassium (AK), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and pH were measured according to the soil quality guidelines [63].

Isolation of culturable bacteria

The parental seeds were simultaneously collected from two rice cultivars, Dular and P64, in NC. Harvested seeds were defined as offspring rice seeds. All mature seeds were randomly selected in the field and sealed immediately in sterilized plastic bags at 4 °C until further processing.

Parental and offspring seeds were used to isolate the endophytic bacteria. Five grams of seeds of each cultivar was dehusked first. The surface sterilization method followed that of Verma, with minor modifications [64]. Firstly, the dehusked seeds were rinsed twice with sterile water and treated with 70% ethanol for 3 min. Subsequently, the seeds were sterilized with 1% (available chlorine) sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and 70% ethanol for 30 s and washed thrice with sterile water. The remaining disinfectant on the surface of the seeds was removed with sterile filter paper, and the seeds were rinsed thrice with sterile water. Finally, any remaining water on the surface of the sterile seeds was removed using sterile filter paper. The efficacy of surface sterilization was verified by inoculating 100 μL of sterile water from randomly selected samples into the tryptic soy agar (TSA). The plates were incubated at 30 °C and observed for 5 days to check for microbial growth. Surface-sterilized seeds were ground into powder in a sterile mortar. The powder was then transferred into 50-mL sterile water tubes and maintained at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 30 min. The homogenate was serially diluted in 9 mL sterile deionized water. One-hundred microliters of the homogenate from each dilution (up to 10−6) was plated in triplicate on three different culture media: Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A), A15 nitrogen-free medium (A15), and TSA [65]. Agar plates were incubated at 30 °C for 7 days. All the purified colonies were stored at −80 °C with 20% (v/v) glycerol for long-term storage.

Illumina and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted using a FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Then, DNA was examined using 1.0% (v/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a NanoDrop One Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). Isolated DNA was stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

For 16S rRNA gene libraries, the V3-V4 region was amplified using the universal primers 534f (5′-CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAAT-3′) and 783r (5′-ACCMGGGTATCTAATCCKG-3′) [66]. Amplification was performed using the following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) program: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by seven cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 65 °C for 1 min (decreasing at 2 °C per cycle), and 72 °C for 90 s; secondly, 30 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and, finally, 72 °C for 5 min as a final extension. PCR amplifications were performed using the Phanta Max Master Mix kit P515 (Vazyme, China). The PCR products were examined using 1.0% (v/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. Amplicon sequencing was performed at Novogene Co., Ltd. on the Illumina HiSeq P250 platform with 250 bp paired-end technology.

The resulting sequences were demultiplexed and quality filtered using Vsearch on the Galaxy platform (version 2.7.2) [67]. Paired-end reads were checked using FastQC (version 0.10.136) [68] and merged using the Vsearch script fastq_mergepairs command. After removing barcodes and primers, low-quality reads were filtered, and nonredundant reads were identified. The zero-radius OTUs (zOTUs/ASV) table was generated using UNOISE3 [69]. After removing the ASVs not present in at least 5% of all samples, we obtained 249,443,008 raw reads with an average length of 379 bp from 481 samples in total (20 bulk soil, 107 rhizosphere, 117 roots, 106 stems, and 131 seed samples). After quality trimming, the taxonomy of each sequence was analyzed by RDP Classifier [70] against the SILVA small subunit rRNA database (version 138) using a confidence threshold of 0.7 [71]. We obtained 24,504,476 high-quality reads that were assigned to 26,646 bacterial ASVs after removing ASVs taxonomically classified as mitochondria, chloroplasts, or Archaea. Finally, the 16S rRNA sequences were assigned to 28 bacterial phyla, 929 genera, and 26,646 ASVs.

To identify the 957 bacterial isolates, we amplified the 16S rRNA genes of the strains using the universal primers 27f (5′-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492r (5′-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [72] and sequenced the fragments using the primer 1492r in Sanger sequencing approach. Sequences were identified by aligning the EzBioCloud’s identification service using similarity-based searches [73].

Bioinformatic analysis

Downstream analysis was performed using the MicrobiomeAnalyst online pipeline [74] marker data profiling (MDP) and shotgun data profiling (SDP) modules and R platform (version 4.1.0). All the samples were rarefied to the sample with the least number of sequences (2000 read counts) before downstream analyses.

Diversity analysis

Alpha-analysis was carried out based on Chao1 and Shannon diversity measures at the ASV level. Beta-analysis was carried out using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity at the ASV level. Permutational multivariate analyses of variance analyses were performed using the “Adonis” function implemented in the vegan package in R [75]. RDA was performed using R script “vegan” (Version 2.5–7) [75].

Taxonomic composition

Taxa composition was generated at the class and genus levels for all six microhabitats (bulk, rhizosphere, root, stem, seed, and seed-P), and the top five classes or genera accounting for the highest proportions were calculated. A condition of minimum count = 1, prevalence in samples > 10%, and merging all taxa with counts < 10 were used, and six bacterial phyla and 124 genera were filtered for taxonomic composition analysis. For class level taxa, small taxa were merged into “others” with the ASV counts < 10. For genus level taxa, distribution of bacteria with top 50 items was determined, and the rest of genus was merged into “others.” Only the top 20 items were labeled. The distribution of isolates was visualized by Circos plot created using the circlize package in R [76].

Core taxa selection

We used the EVenn online tool to visualize the ASVs that overlapped among all plant compartments and soils [77]. Overlapping ASVs were defined as those detected in at least one sample in each compartment. The sequencing number in the ASV table was summed at the compartment level with every single replicates. Y-axis was log transformed, and statistical significance was determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Furthermore, abundance occupancy analyses were conducted at a threshold of 70% to identify the core ASVs across the environmental gradients.

Network construction

These are features of the global network of rice-associated bacterial communities across the six sampling microhabitats. SparCC algorithm was used to calculate the network at the ASV level with an abundance of > 0.01% and p < 0.05. Only ASVs detected in > 25% of the samples were used for network construction. Random matrix theory (RMT) was used to automatically identify the appropriate similarity threshold prior to network construction. All analyses were performed using the molecular ecological network analysis (MENA) pipeline (http://ieg2.ou.edu/MENA/) [23, 78]. The networks were graphed using Gephi 0.9.2 [79]. The modularity of each network was characterized using a greedy modularity optimization method. Furthermore, the within-module connectivity (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi) of each node were calculated to classify the putative keystone species in the network. Node topologies were organized into four categories: module hubs (highly connected nodes within modules, Zi > 2.5), network hubs (highly connected nodes within the entire network, Zi > 2.5 and Pi > 0.62), connectors (nodes that connect modules, Pi > 0.62), and peripherals (nodes connected within modules with few outside connections, Zi < 2.5 and Pi < 0.62). All plots were generated using ggplot2 (version 3.3.2) [80].

Genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Genomic DNA of all strains (Pantoea = 21, Xanthomonas = 27) was extracted using a HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen Bio, Guangzhou, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocols, and quantified using a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Qualified genomic DNA (> 10 nM) was selected for short-read sequencing (2 × 150 bp) using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Genomes were assembled, predicted the open reading frames were predicted, and annotated with the PGCGAP pipeline (version 1.0.28) [81]. All analyses were performed using the default parameters.

Functional genome analysis

Secondary metabolism analysis was performed using the Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell pipeline (antiSMASH, version 6.0.1) with default parameters [82]. Briefly, the detection strictness was “relaxed,” and all “extra features,” including “ClusterBlast,” “KnownClusterBlast,” “SubClusterBlast,” “Cluster Pfam analysis,” “Pfam-based GO term annotation,” and “ActiveSiteFinder,” were employed for biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) border prediction and analysis.

Genomes were screened for the presence of secretion systems using MacSyFinder (version 2.5.1) with the “TXSScan” models with command “−db_type ordered_replicon all” [83].

To prediction of cellulase, β-galactosidase, indole-3-acetyl-aspartic acid hydrolase (IaaH), and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activities; all reference sequences were downloaded from the UniProt database. Blastp (version 2.12.0) was used to search each proteome for homologs with a score of e-value ≤ 1e-5 and ≥ 60% alignment length [84]. However, it should be noted that the protein hits in each strain did not necessarily indicate the presence of the corresponding function.

Phylogenomic reconstruction

We inferred the COGs of the strains (Pantoea = 41, Xanthomonas = 49) using OrthoFinder (version 2.5.4) [85]. Next, 1258 gene families and 892 gene families exclusively containing single-copy genes present in all genomes separately were selected as potential phylogenetic markers. A concatenated alignment of all markers was built with MAFFT (version 7.475) [86], and phylogenomic trees were constructed with FastTree (version 2.1.10) [87]. The phylogenomic tree was midpoint rooted and visualized using the online tool, Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [88].

Core and pan-genome analyses

Homologous genes were clustered into gene families for all isolated strain genomes (Pantoea = 21, Xanthomonas = 27) and identified using OrthoFinder software with default parameters respectively. The single-copy core genome sets were extracted from the OrthoFinder output. COG and KEGG pathway annotations were performed using the Blastp software (version 2.2.25) against the COG [89] and KEGG [90] databases. Rarefaction curves for the core and pan-genomes of Pantoea and Xanthomonas were individually estimated using PanGP [91].

Heatmap construction of ANI and reciprocal concatenated core genome

Pairwise genomic similarities between parental and offspring isolates (Pantoea: 12 vs 9, Xanthomonas: 10 vs 17) were calculated using FastANI (version 1.32) [92]. Pairwise core genome identities were calculated using the EMBOSS stretcher tool (version 6.6.0) [93]. Pairwise genomic similarities and core genome identities were then drawn in R (version 4.1.0) package “pheatmap” (https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html).

Plate assays for functional bacteria

Isolated strains were tested for plant growth-promoting traits. Assays for phosphorus-solubilizing (both inorganic and organic phosphate) and cellulose-hydrolyzing activities were performed [94, 95]. Colonies exhibiting clear zones indicated phosphate-solubilizing or cellulose-hydrolyzing activity. Selected bacterial isolates were subjected to in vitro colorimetric determination of IAA production using Salkowski’s reagent (2% of 0.5 M FeCl3 in 35% perchloric acid), following a standard protocol [96]. Appearance of a reddish to pinkish color in the solution indicated the presence of IAA in the cultured medium. All the assays were conducted in triplicates and repeated at least twice.

Antagonistic capacity of selected Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains against Magnaporthe oryzae on potato dextrose agar (PDA) was performed as follows: fresh mycelial disks (diameter, 5 mm) of the fungi were inoculated onto the center of fresh PDA plates (diameter, 90 mm), and 5 μL of each saturated bacterial culture was dotted around the inocula at a distance of 30 mm. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 3–4 days, and the antibiosis ability was determined by measuring the antagonistic zones. To test the antagonistic capacity for phytobacteria, 5 mL of X. oryzae pv. oryzae cultures was premixed with 50 °C Luria-Bertani medium and poured onto plates. Five microliters of each saturated strain culture was placed at the plate center and incubated at 28 °C for 2–3 days. Clear inhibition zones indicated antagonistic activity. All the assays were independently performed at least twice in triplicate.

Availability of data and materials

Scripts for bioinformatic analysis and plotting used in this study are available at https://github.com/lagrangemyn/RiceMicrobiome. Raw sequence data for 16S rRNA gene amplicons are available on the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA), accession number: PRJNA837349. Whole genome data have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PRJNA843221. Draft genome data have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PRJNA844595.

References

  1. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(11):607–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015;206(4):1196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32(5):723–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bordenstein SR, Theis KR. Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(8):e1002226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Theis KR, Dheilly NM, Klassen JL, Brucker RM, Baines JF, Bosch TC, et al. Getting the hologenome concept right: an eco-evolutionary framework for hosts and their microbiomes. Msystems. 2016;1(2):e00028–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson EB. Microbial dynamics and interactions in the spermosphere. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:271–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson EB. The seed microbiome: origins, interactions, and impacts. Plant Soil. 2018;422(1):7–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. da Silveira APD, Iorio RPF, Marcos FCC, Fernandes AO, de Souza S, Kuramae EE, et al. Exploitation of new endophytic bacteria and their ability to promote sugarcane growth and nitrogen nutrition. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2019;112(2):283–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weyens N, van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Newman L, Vangronsveld J. Exploiting plant-microbe partnerships to improve biomass production and remediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27(10):591–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg G, Raaijmakers JM. Saving seed microbiomes. ISME J. 2018;12(5):1167–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015;7(1):40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchholz F, Kostic T, Sessitsch A, Mitter B. The potential of plant microbiota in reducing postharvest food loss. Microb Biotechnol. 2018;11(6):971–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kong HG, Song GC, Ryu CM. Inheritance of seed and rhizosphere microbial communities through plant-soil feedback and soil memory. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2019;11(4):479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vannier N, Mony C, Bittebiere AK, Michon-Coudouel S, Biget M, Vandenkoornhuyse P. A microorganisms’ journey between plant generations. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank AC, Saldierna Guzmán JP, Shay JE. Transmission of bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms. 2017;5:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shade A, Jacques MA, Barret M. Ecological patterns of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and assembly. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;37:15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eyre AW, Wang M, Oh Y, Dean RA. Identification and characterization of the core rice seed microbiome. Phytobiomes J. 2019;3(2):148–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo J, Ling N, Li Y, Li K, Ning H, Shen Q, et al. Seed-borne, endospheric and rhizospheric core microbiota as predictors of plant functional traits across rice cultivars are dominated by deterministic processes. New Phytol. 2021;230(5):2047–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim H, Lee KK, Jeon J, Harris WA, Lee YH. Domestication of Oryza species eco-evolutionarily shapes bacterial and fungal communities in rice seed. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsumoto H, Fan X, Wang Y, Kusstatscher P, Duan J, Wu S, et al. Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat Plants. 2021;7(1):60–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Raj G, Shadab M, Deka S, Das M, Baruah J, Bharali R, et al. Seed interior microbiome of rice genotypes indigenous to three agroecosystems of Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang M, Eyre AW, Thon MR, Oh Y, Dean RA. Dynamic changes in the microbiome of rice during shoot and root growth derived from seeds. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:559728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deng Y, Jiang YH, Yang Y, He Z, Luo F, Zhou J. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinform. 2012;13:113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cordovez V, Dini-Andreote F, Carrion VJ, Raaijmakers JM. Ecology and evolution of plant microbiomes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2019;73:69–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Drew GC, Stevens EJ, King KC. Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(10):623–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hassani MA, Duran P, Hacquard S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guttman DS, McHardy AC, Schulze-Lefert P. Microbial genome-enabled insights into plant-microorganism interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(12):797–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hacquard S, Garrido-Oter R, Gonzalez A, Spaepen S, Ackermann G, Lebeis S, et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):603–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kembel SW, O'Connor TK, Arnold HK, Hubbell SP, Wright SJ, Green JL. Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(38):13715–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. The Prokaryotes, A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, Volume 6: Proteobacteria: Gamma Subclass. New York: Springer; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Hernandez M, Dumont MG, Yuan Q, Conrad R. Different bacterial populations associated with the roots and rhizosphere of rice incorporate plant-derived carbon. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(6):2244–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee A, Hirsch AM. Signals and responses: choreographing the complex interaction between legumes and alpha- and beta-rhizobia. Plant Signal Behav. 2006;1(4):161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun M, Xiao T, Ning Z, Xiao E, Sun W. Microbial community analysis in rice paddy soils irrigated by acid mine drainage contaminated water. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(6):2911–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang J, Liu YX, Zhang N, Hu B, Jin T, Xu H, et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(6):676–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cernava T, Aschenbrenner IA, Soh J, Sensen CW, Grube M, Berg G. Plasticity of a holobiont: desiccation induces fasting-like metabolism within the lichen microbiota. ISME J. 2019;13(2):547–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Eke P, Kumar A, Sahu KP, Wakam LN, Sheoran N, Ashajyothi M, et al. Endophytic bacteria of desert cactus (Euphorbia trigonas Mill) confer drought tolerance and induce growth promotion in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Microbiol Res. 2019;228:126302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fouts DE, Tyler HL, DeBoy RT, Daugherty S, Ren Q, Badger JH, et al. Complete genome sequence of the N2-fixing broad host range endophyte Klebsiella pneumoniae 342 and virulence predictions verified in mice. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(7):e1000141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, Dekkers E, van der Voort M, Schneider JH, et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science. 2011;332(6033):1097–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Raaijmakers JM, Mazzola M. Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2012;50:403–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(4):435–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sessitsch A, Hardoim P, Doring J, Weilharter A, Krause A, Woyke T, et al. Functional characteristics of an endophyte community colonizing rice roots as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012;25(1):28–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferreira A, Quecine MC, Lacava PT, Oda S, Azevedo JL, Araujo WL. Diversity of endophytic bacteria from Eucalyptus species seeds and colonization of seedlings by Pantoea agglomerans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;287(1):8–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnston-Monje D, Raizada MN. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes in Zea across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaga H, Mano H, Tanaka F, Watanabe A, Kaneko S, Morisaki H. Rice seeds as sources of endophytic bacteria. Microbes Environ. 2009;24(2):154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brady C, Cleenwerck I, Venter S, Vancanneyt M, Swings J, Coutinho T. Phylogeny and identification of Pantoea species associated with plants, humans and the natural environment based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Syst Appl Microbiol. 2008;31(6-8):447–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu Y, Zuo S, Xu L, Zou Y, Song W. Study on diversity of endophytic bacterial communities in seeds of hybrid maize and their parental lines. Arch Microbiol. 2012;194(12):1001–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rezki S, Campion C, Simoneau P, Jacques M-A, Shade A, Barret M. Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities within and across successive plant generations. Plant Soil. 2018;422(1):67–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Walterson AM, Stavrinides J. Pantoea: insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39(6):968–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Coutinho TA, Venter SN. Pantoea ananatis: an unconventional plant pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(3):325–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu S, Liu YX, Cernava T, Wang H, Zhou Y, Xia T, et al. Fusarium fruiting body microbiome member Pantoea agglomerans inhibits fungal pathogenesis by targeting lipid rafts. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7(6):831–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nino-Liu DO, Ronald PC, Bogdanove AJ. Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars: model pathogens of a model crop. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;7(5):303–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Timilsina S, Potnis N, Newberry EA, Liyanapathiranage P, Iruegas-Bocardo F, White FF, et al. Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(8):415–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. White FF, Potnis N, Jones JB, Koebnik R. The type III effectors of Xanthomonas. Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(6):749–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Giovannoni SJ, Cameron Thrash J, Temperton B. Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. ISME J. 2014;8(8):1553–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B, Van Montagu M, Kellenberger E. Root colonization and systemic spreading of Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in grasses. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(7):1913–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. James EK, Gyaneshwar P, Mathan N, Barraquio WL, Reddy PM, Iannetta PP, et al. Infection and colonization of rice seedlings by the plant growth-promoting bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae Z67. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002;15(9):894–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mano H, Tanaka F, Watanabe A, Kaga H, Okunishi S, Morisaki H. Culturable surface and endophytic bacterial flora of the maturing seeds of rice plants (Oryza sativa) cultivated in a paddy field. Microbes Environ. 2006;21(2):86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liang D, Guo J, Hou F, Bowatte S. High level of conservation and diversity among the endophytic seed bacteriome in eight alpine grassland species growing at the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021;97(6):fiab060. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiab060.

  59. Rodriguez H, Fraga R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv. 1999;17(4-5):319–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gu S, Wei Z, Shao Z, Friman VP, Cao K, Yang T, et al. Competition for iron drives phytopathogen control by natural rhizosphere microbiomes. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(8):1002–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Loper JE, Henkels MD. Utilization of heterologous siderophores enhances levels of iron available to Pseudomonas putida in the rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(12):5357–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Friesen DK, Blair G. A comparison of soil sampling procedures used to monitor soil fertility in permanent pastures. Soil Res. 1984;22:81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hill R, Sparling G. Soil quality monitoring. In: Land and soil monitoring: a guide for SoE and regional council reporting. NZ: Land Monitoring Forum; 2009. p. 27–88.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Verma SC, Singh A, Chowdhury SP, Tripathi AK. Endophytic colonization ability of two deep-water rice endophytes, Pantoea sp. and Ochrobactrum sp. using green fluorescent protein reporter. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(5):425–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Galimand M, Perroud B, Delorme F, Paquelin A, Vieille C, Bozouklian H, et al. Identification of DNA regions homologous to nitrogen fixation genes nifE, nifUS and fixABC in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135(5):1047–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Rastogi G, Tech JJ, Coaker GL, Leveau JH. A PCR-based toolbox for the culture-independent quantification of total bacterial abundances in plant environments. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;83(2):127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Feng K, Zhang Z, Cai W, Liu W, Xu M, Yin H, et al. Biodiversity and species competition regulate the resilience of microbial biofilm community. Mol Ecol. 2017;26(21):6170–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue LA. FQC dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(19):3137–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Edgar RC. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1101/081257.

  70. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(2):697–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67(5):1613–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, Xia J. Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(3):799–821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara R, et al. Package ‘vegan’. Commun Ecol Package Version. 2013;2(9):1–295.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gu Z, Gu L, Eils R, Schlesner M, Brors B. circlize Implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(19):2811–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Chen T, Zhang H, Liu Y, Liu YX, Huang L. EVenn: easy to create repeatable and editable Venn diagrams and Venn networks online. J Genet Genomics. 2021;48(9):863–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Feng K, Peng X, Zhang Z, Gu S, He Q, Shen W, et al. iNAP: an integrated network analysis pipeline for microbiome studies. iMeta. 2022;1, e13. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt.

  79. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, vol. 3; 2009. p. 361–2.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wickham H. Data analysis. In: ggplot2: Springer; 2016. p. 189–201.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  81. Liu H, Xin B, Zheng J, Zhong H, Yu Y, Peng D, et al. Build a bioinformatic analysis platform and apply it to routine analysis of microbial genomics and comparative genomics. Res Sq. 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.21224/v6.

  82. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W29–w35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Abby SS, Rocha EPC. Identification of protein secretion systems in bacterial genomes using MacSyFinder. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1615:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(7):1641–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W256–W9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Vera Alvarez R, Landsman D, Koonin EV. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D274–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhao Y, Jia X, Yang J, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Yu J, et al. PanGP: a tool for quickly analyzing bacterial pan-genome profile. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1297–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):276–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Nautiyal CS. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;170(1):265–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Cattelan AJ, Hartel PG, Fuhrmann JJ. Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to promote early soybean growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999;63(6):1670–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Cappuccino J, Sherman N. Microbiology: a laboratory manual: Addison-Wesley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Y. Luo at the Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and R. Wang at Tianjin Agricultural University for their technical assistance in this study.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31970007 and 31670005 to X. Z.) and the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public-interest Scientific Institutions (grant no. Y2022PT12 to H. L. W.). H. L. W. and X. Z. were supported by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (grant no. CAAS-ZDRW202201).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoxia Zhang and Yi-Nan Ma contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Collection and Preservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China

    Xiaoxia Zhang, Yi-Nan Ma, Xing Wang, Kaiji Liao, Shanwen He, Xia Zhao, Hebao Guo, Dongfang Zhao & Hai-Lei Wei

Authors
  1. Xiaoxia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi-Nan Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaiji Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shanwen He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xia Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hebao Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dongfang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hai-Lei Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XZ and HLW conceived the study and supervised the project. XZ and HG performed the field experiments and collected samples. XZ, HG, and XW conducted the laboratory analyses. XZ, YM, and XW coordinated bacterial isolation and revised the manuscript. XZ, HLW, YM, and KL conducted informatics analysis. HLW wrote the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-Lei Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Sample collection and physicochemical properties. a, Samples were collected from four regions. SY, Sanya; LF, Langfang; NC, Nanchang; XB, Xishuangbanna. n represents the sample numbers. b, Physicochemical properties of bulk soil samples from four regions. Means with the same letters are not statistically different based on a T-test (p < 0.05). c, Redundancy analysis based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity method of bulk soil ASV table and physicochemical properties from four regions. RDA1 and RDA2 show the first and second components of the RDA analysis, respectively. Regions are highlighted by ellipse and point shape. Significance of microbial community dissimilarities among different groups are based on a permutation test (p = 0.005).

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2.

Average Good’s coverage and rarefaction curves of six microhabitats. a, Bulk, bulk soil; b, Rhizo, rhizosphere; c, Root, root endosphere; d, Stem, stem endosphere; e, Seed-P, parental seed endosphere; f, Seed, offspring seed endosphere. Good’s coverage estimates are calculated in mothur based on 10,000 iterations. Rarefaction curves are generated showing the number of ASVs using 100 steps as rarefaction calculations, relative to the number of total sequences. The dashed vertical line indicates the number of sequences normalized from each sample to calculate alpha diversity.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3.

ASV level alpha diversity of rice-associated bacterial microbiomes based on compartment and breed variation.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure 4.

Taxa sorted by sampling areas from different compartments.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Figure 5.

Z-P plot of ASVs on compartment variation. The within-module connectivity (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi) of each node were calculated to classify putative keystone ASVs in the network. Node topologies were organized into four categories: module hubs (highly connected nodes within modules, Zi > 2.5), network hubs (highly connected nodes within the entire network, Zi >2.5 and Pi > 0.62), connectors (nodes that connect modules, Pi> 0.62), and peripherals (nodes connected within modules with few outside connections, Zi < 2.5 and Pi < 0.62.

Additional file 6: Supplementary Figure 6.

The occurrence frequency of core ASVs in different compartments. Each replicate was considered as a single group, and the sequencing/read number > 1 was classified as presented.

Additional file 7: Supplementary Figure 7.

Average Nucleotide Identity based on BLAST for a selection of bacterial genomes. a, Pantoea: 21 strains and 6 type strains. b, Xanthomonas: 27 strains and 3 type strains). The prefix character “P_” of the strain name in the horizontal label indicates that the strain is of parental origin. The prefix character “O_” of the strain name in the vertical axis label indicates that the strain is derived from offspring. Cell colors indicate similarity scaled from low (blue) to high (red). ANIb values were calculated using fastANI.

Additional file 8: Supplementary Figure 8.

Pan-genome analysis of Pantoea (n = 21) and 27 Xanthomonas (n = 27) strains. a and c, Flower plots indicating the core and pan genes in isolated Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains. The numbers of pan or core genes between subsets of genome were shown. b and d, Pan-genome accumulation curves. The curve of the pan-genome plot and the heaps law model (alpha = 0.21 for Pantoea and 0.19 for Xanthomonas) indicated an open-pan genome among these isolates.

Additional file 9: Supplementary Figure 9.

Functional characterization of the core genome of Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains. a and b, COG annotation of core genome from Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains. c and d, KEGG annotation of core genome from Pantoea and Xanthomonas strains. Colors in panels a and c correspond to those depicted in panel b and d.

Additional file 10: Supplementary Table 1.

Total number of reads and read length before and after quality checking and normalization.

Additional file 11: Supplementary Table 2.

Assigned numbers of bacterial phyla, genera and ASV under different locations, microhabitats and varieties.

Additional file 12: Supplementary Table 3.

Alpha diversity indicated by Chao1 and Shannon under microhabitats, locations and varieties variations with related P and F values.

Additional file 13: Supplementary Table 4.

Taxonomic composition of the bacterial communities under different plant microhabitats, locations at the class or genus level.

Additional file 14: Supplementary Table 5.

Topological properties of networks for bacterial ASVs under different microhabitats.

Additional file 15: Supplementary Table 6.

Hub nodes revealed by ASV's Zi and Pi based on microhabitat variation.

Additional file 16: Supplementary Table 7.

Detailed taxonomy classification of core rice endophytic microbiota with 70% occurrence in the collected samples.

Additional file 17: Supplementary Table 8.

Genomic characteristics of Pantoea and Xanthomonas isolates.

Additional file 18: Supplementary Table 9.

Biocontrol and plant growth-promoting properties of selected Pantoea and Xanthomonas.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Ma, YN., Wang, X. et al. Dynamics of rice microbiomes reveal core vertically transmitted seed endophytes. Microbiome 10, 216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01422-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01422-9

Keywords

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us