Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Host immunoglobulin G selectively identifies pathobionts in pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 4,
  • 5,
  • 1, 4,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 6,
  • 1, 4,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1, 4 and
  • 1, 2, 3Email author
Microbiome20197:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0604-3

©  The Author(s). 2019

  • Received: 5 July 2018
  • Accepted: 25 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are a group of complex and multifactorial disorders with unknown etiology. Chronic intestinal inflammation develops against resident intestinal bacteria in genetically susceptible hosts. We hypothesized that host intestinal immunoglobulin (Ig) G can be used to identify bacteria involved in IBD pathogenesis.

Results

IgG-bound and -unbound microorganisms were collected from 32 pediatric terminal ileum aspirate washes during colonoscopy [non-IBD (n = 10), Crohn disease (n = 15), and ulcerative colitis (n = 7)], and composition was assessed using the Illumina MiSeq platform. In vitro analysis of invasive capacity was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and gentamicin invasion assay; immune activation was measured by qPCR. Despite considerable inter-individual variations, IgG binding favored specific and unique mucosa-associated species in pediatric IBD patients. Burkholderia cepacia, Flavonifractor plautii, and Rumminococcus sp. demonstrated increased IgG binding, while Pseudomonas ST29 demonstrated reduced IgG binding, in IBD. In vitro validation confirmed that B. cepacia, F. plautii, and Rumminococcus display invasive potential while Pseudomonas protogens did not.

Conclusion

Using IgG as a marker of pathobionts in larger patient cohorts to identify microbes and elucidate their role in IBD pathogenesis will potentially underpin new strategies to facilitate development of novel, targeted diagnostic, and therapeutic approaches. Interestingly, this method can be used beyond the scope of this manuscript to evaluate altered gut pathobionts in a number of diseases associated with altered microbiota including arthritis, obesity, diabetes mellitus, alcoholic liver disease, cirrhosis, metabolic syndrome, and carcinomas.

Keywords

  • Crohn disease
  • Immunoglobulins
  • Microbiota
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Dysbiosis

Background

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) include the chronic and severely debilitating, immune-mediated disorders known as Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) [1, 2]. North America and Northern Europe demonstrates some of the highest prevalence rates of IBD in the world affecting approximately 1 in 150 Canadians, and incidence rates are rising, especially in children, who make up 25% of newly diagnosed cases each year [3–6]. The etiology of IBD remains poorly understood; however, it is recognized to be multifactorial with both hereditary and environmental factors, such as urban lifestyle, dietary factors, heightened hygiene, and the gut microbiota involved in disease development [1, 2, 7–13]. The intestinal microbiome is critical to maintain human health and is involved in mediating key functions of metabolism and the immune system [8, 14]. Altered gut microbiota has been associated with a number of diseases including arthritis, obesity, diabetes mellitus, alcoholic liver disease, cirrhosis, metabolic syndrome, carcinomas, and IBD [15–23]. Microbial diversity is commonly reduced in IBD, and this can be used as a predictive marker for failure to respond to therapy in severe pediatric UC [24]. Dysbiosis, or compositional changes in the intestinal microbiota, is a hallmark of IBD, along with defects in the gastrointestinal barrier and a loss of immune tolerance [1, 2, 12–14].

Recognition of enteric microbes by the intestinal immune system results in the production of immunoglobulin (Ig) A and IgG, predominant antibody isotypes found at the intestinal mucosal surface [25, 26]. These antibodies provide protection against infection by binding to and coating pathogens within the intestinal lumen. Studies completed by our group [27], and others [28, 29] suggest that coating of intestinal bacteria with high-affinity IgA can be used to identify pathogenic strains involved in the development of IBD. A recent study by D’Auria et al. supported our hypothesis as they reported a difference in taxa bound by IgA compared to total bacteria in healthy subjects [30]. More recently, Palm et al. elucidated a role for IgA-bound bacteria isolated from the stool of IBD patients in inducing colitis in nude mice [28].

While previous studies focused on IgA as a marker of pathobionts support our hypothesis in general, focusing on IgG-bound bacteria may provide even more clinically relevant results as the majority of secretory IgA within the intestine binds bacteria non-selectively, resulting in the identification of commensal bacteria [31]. In contrast, IgG in the lumen has been shown to be elevated in IBD patients [32–34] and IgG+ intestinal plasmablasts are greater than 3-fold more reactive to specific pathobionts than IgA+ plasmablasts [35, 36], demonstrating IgG’s pathogen-binding specificity. Furthermore, while IgA remains the predominantly produced immunoglobulin in the intestinal tract of healthy patients, studies have demonstrated a predominance of IgG in IBD patients [37]. Therefore, we have focused on IgG-bound bacteria.

The specific responses of the adaptive immune system, which is more involved in IgG vs IgA production, towards these luminal antigens are altered in IBD patients [38, 39]. Our group has further demonstrated that the mucosal layer structure and mucosal microbial composition are altered in unaffected ileal tissues from pediatric UC patients [27], suggesting a link for microbial involvement in UC pathogenesis, and not just a change secondary to inflammation. For this reason, we have examined only unaffected regions of the terminal ileum (TI), determined by histology.

There is relatively little direct interaction between microorganisms found in the intestinal lumen and the underlying epithelium, which are separated by the mucus layer [40, 41]. While many microorganisms have been linked to disease, those associated with the mucosa are more likely to play a role in IBD pathogenesis than those within the lumen due to their proximity to the intestinal epithelium [40, 41]. These microorganisms, therefore, have the potential to invoke the characteristic inflammatory symptoms of these diseases.

Based on these data, we hypothesized that bacteria more highly bound by IgG would display greater virulence than unbound strains and that identification of these invasive, pathobiont strains (defined as pathogenic only under specific conditions [42]) will assist in better understanding the mechanisms of intestinal immune activation and aberrant immune reactivity to microbes in IBD pathogenesis. This proof-of-principle study reveals that increased IgG binding to microorganisms collected from intestinal washes of the mucosal epithelium of pediatric IBD patients allows for selective identification of specific microorganisms that display pathobiont properties and, therefore, may be involved in driving or exacerbating IBD.

Results

Optimization of bacterial cell sorting in mixed culture

As IgG antibodies provide protection to the intestinal mucosa by binding and coating pathogens, we hypothesize that coating of intestinal bacteria with high-affinity IgG can be used to identify pathogenic strains that have previously stimulated a humoral response, and are therefore more likely to be invasive/pathobionts, involved in the development of IBD. To first evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) in recognizing and isolating bacteria in vitro, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) surface staining of Escherichia coli HB101 was determined. This demonstrated that indeed, 53% of E. coli were positively stained compared to 2% in the isotype control sample (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). To further demonstrate the ability of FACS to adequately sort bacteria, E. coli HB101 and Lactobacillus reuteri were co-cultured 1:1 (Additional file 1: Figure S1B) and E. coli were stained using an anti E. coli O+K antibody, then separated by FACS gating. Purity and viability were determined by growth patterns on specific agar plates (confirmed and quantified by qPCR; Additional file 1: Figure S1C), showing extremely high purity of E. coli (grown on MacConkey and MRS agar plates; 95–98%) and excellent viability after FACS sorting. These results demonstrate our ability to isolate and culture antibody-bound bacteria from a mixed population using FACS, as also demonstrated by others [28].

Isolation of IgG-coated bacteria from pediatric IBD intestinal washes

To characterize the composition of the intestinal microbiota of pediatric IBD and non-IBD control patients, luminal wash samples were processed through a series of steps as displayed in Fig. 1a. We utilized the binding of microbes by patient-derived IgG, which occurs naturally within the gut of patients to then separate these IgG-bound bacteria using FACS. Intestinal wash samples were collected from pediatric non-IBD (n = 10; mean age 13.4 years), CD (n = 15; mean age 12.6 years), and UC (n = 7; mean age 12.7 years) patients at the University of Alberta Stollery Children’s Hospital in Edmonton, Canada (see patient characteristic summary in Additional file 1: Table S1; further details on individual patients are highlighted in Additional file 1: Table S2). IgG-coated microbes were distinguished from non-IgG-coated microbes by FACS using an anti-human IgG antibody for visualization (Fig. 1b; Additional file 1: Table S3). A minimum of 6 million events were collected per samples (IgG+ and IgG−). All samples were first fixed using paraformaldehyde to “kill” and permeabilize the microbial cells and to secure that IgG will remain bound to bacteria. Propidium iodide (PI) was then utilized to stain these fixed microbes to separate out all food particulate, mucous, and non-microbes from the intestinal wash supernatants (only intact, fixed microbes would retain the PI; all PI-negative particles would not be bacteria). This allowed us to appropriately examine IgG binding to microbes rather than background noise from these samples. Bacteria positive for both PI (stains DNA to identify bacterial cells) and IgG were labeled IgG+, and those positive for PI but not IgG were designated IgG−. An average of 33.7% (non-IBD), 29.7% (CD), and 34.2% (UC) of each sample was sorted as the IgG+ fraction, while 34.8% (non-IBD), 25.6% (CD), and 35.8% (UC) was sorted to IgG− (p > 0.05 for all). Roughly 107 CFU/mL bacterial cells were collected per sample in order to obtain enough DNA for sequencing.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

IgG cell sorting and 16S rRNA gene sequencing identify microbes collected from pediatric IBD patient ileal wishes. a Sequence of procedures for the identification of IgG-bound pathobiont microbes. b Representative of cell sorting of patient sample #81 by BD FACSAria III with a shift in population of IgG+ bacteria (33.3%). The Q1 and Q2 quadrants comprise PI positive/IgG negative (IgG−) and PI positive/IgG positive (IgG+), respectively. c Representative of image flow cytometry with shift in population of IgG+ bacteria. The Amnis ImagestreamX mkII was used for acquisition of image cytometry, performed at × 60 magnification. Gating compensation was performed using individual stained (DAPI, EUB338, or anti-IgG) sample controls. Analysis was performed using IDEAS Software version 6.1

To confirm the ability of FACS to differentiate IgG+ from IgG− bacteria, as well as to validate the specificity and sensitivity of FACS to detect bacteria only, and no other particles, the sorted samples were assessed in parallel using image cytometry (Fig. 1c). Bacteria were stained with EUB338 eukaryote stain and IgG antibody, and coinciding images demonstrate accurate cell sorting of IgG− and IgG+ bacteria using FACS, allowing for comparative sequencing.

Microbial composition of ileal isolates from pediatric IBD patients using 16S rRNA gene libraries

Mucosa-associated bacteria were collected from the TI during endoscopy by washing the surface with normal saline (0.9%) and aspirating the content. Several studies have shown the utility of intestinal washes in capturing microbes in close contact to the mucosa and that these are very different from microbes found in the stool [43, 44]. This is achieved by direct disruption and collection of the mucus layer during endoscopy. Although we did not compare the microbes identified in our study to the luminal ones, the lumen is usually dry after bowel prep and is less likely to contain sufficient bacteria for comparison. Bacteria were then fixed and spun down, and DNA extracted, as described in the “Methods” section. The composition of ileal microbiota of pediatric patients was then examined by Illumina MiSeq sequencing on a total of 15 CD and 7 UC patients and 10 non-IBD control subjects (Fig. 1a). While all patient samples were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform, two libraries were constructed—one for 16S rRNA gene analysis and the other for metagenomics. For results referring to 16S rRNA gene, the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was PCR amplified to identify bacteria in non-IBD (n = 9), CD (n = 14), and UC (n = 7) pediatric patient intestinal washes at the phylum level (Fig. 2a, b) and the family level (Fig. 2c). Relative abundance of all major phyla identified by Illumina MiSeq was calculated for the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 2a) libraries. Results from the 16S rRNA gene library displayed no gross statistical difference in relative abundance at the phylum level with predominance in Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes in all patient cohorts (Fig. 2a, b). Only microbes with abundance greater than 1% were included for analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Ilumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene library demonstrates a the relative abundance of phyla per patient and b average among patients in non-IBD (n = 9), CD (n = 14), and UC (n = 7) pediatric patient samples. c Heatmap depicting the mean IgG Coating Index (ICI) scores and average total (IgG+ and IgG−) relative abundance (abund) of bacterial family level taxa for non-IBD, CD, and UC sample sets. ICI scores are depicted on a logarithmic scale; taxa are presented at the closest family/order

In order to compare binding levels of IgG between taxa of non-IBD, CD, and UC patients, we calculated the IgG Coating Index (ICI) score for each bacterial family (ICI = relative abundance [IgG+]/relative abundance [IgG−] [28]). Although ANOVA demonstrated no statistically significant changes in ICI, the median ICI scores at the family level indicated a trend towards IgG binding favoring Clostridiaceae in non-IBD, Porphyromonadaceae in CD, and Bifidobacteriaceae in UC (Fig. 2c). These changes in ICI were not the result of altered total abundances as abundance remained relatively constant between non-IBD, CD, and UC cohorts (Fig. 2c; right side of heatmap). This highlights that ICI is not just a reflection of altered abundance but rather represents a separate process. While family level resolution identified using the 16S rRNA gene library samples was not sufficient to show a significant change in ICI, these results did establish the ability of IgG staining to identify favored genera at the individual patient level.

Altered relative abundance of bacterial species using shotgun metagenomics

To gain more in-depth, accurate, and detailed sequencing data (as 16S rRNA gene analysis was not sufficient for species level analysis), a small number of patient samples were examined by shotgun metagenomics (due to more stringent requirements, several samples used for 16S rRNA analysis did not meet quality criteria for metagenomics). For the shotgun metagenomics sample set, unrestricted sequencing was performed (i.e., included all parts of the bacterial genomes, which were initially fragmented enzymatically) to identify bacteria in non-IBD (n = 2), CD (n = 4), and UC (n = 3) pediatric patient TI washes at the species level. No significant changes were found in the inter-patient variability of bacterial taxon relative abundance at the phylum level (Fig. 3a) with predominantly Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, although changes were more noticeable at the species level (Fig. 3b). Notable changes in relative abundance are highlighted in Table 1. While patterns of relative abundance, detailed in Table 1, were indicative of changes in some patients, the only change in relative abundance that demonstrated statistical significance among all patients was a lowered relative abundance of Moraxella ovis (Proteobacteria; 1.21% non-IBD, 0.20% CD, 0.10% UC) in non-IBD compared to both CD and UC (p < 0.001).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Ilumina MiSeq sequencing of shotgun metagenomic libraries demonstrates changes in the relative abundance of a phyla and b species taxa in non-IBD (n = 2), CD (n = 4), and UC (n = 3) pediatric patient samples. The panel on the right indicates the mean species relative abundance per group. c Heatmap depicting the mean IgG Coating Index (ICI) scores and average total (IgG+ and IgG−) relative abundance (abund) of bacterial species for non-IBD, CD, and UC sample sets. ICI scores are depicted on a logarithmic scale

Table 1

Bacterial relative abundance and ICI score based on shotgun metagenomics library sequencing data (***p < 0.001)

Phyla

Species

% non-IBD

% CD

% UC

High abundance in

 Euryarchaeota

Methanobacterium sp. MB1

4.42

2.97

1.29

non-IBD

 Firmicutes

Streptococcus thermophiles

13.86

3.41

3.17

non-IBD

 Proteobacteria

Devosia sp. H5989

33.29

11.08

1.45

non-IBD

 Proteobacteria

Marinovum algicola

3.14

0.74

0.02

non-IBD

 Proteobacteria

Pseudomonas sp. St29

7.62

0.44

0.29

non-IBD

 Acidobacteria

Terriglobus roseus

2.08

8.68

16.27

IBD

 Actinobacteria

Microlunatus phosphovorus

1.2

4.77

12.98

IBD

 Actinobacteria

Dermabacter vaginalis

0.66

4.19

1.05

IBD

 Bacteroidetes

Capnocytophaga sp. oral taxon 323

0.06

1.6

0.93

IBD

 Proteobacteria

Magnetospirillum magneticum

1.23

20.37

4.77

IBD

 Proteobacteria

Haemophilus] ducreyi

3.14

5.05

16.55

IBD

 Spirochaetes

Sphaerochaeta globosa

1.37

4.17

1.42

IBD

Phyla

Species

ICI non-IBD

ICI CD

ICI UC

High IgG bound in

 Firmicutes

Clostridium cellulovorans

2

0.337209

0.75

non-IBD

 Proteobacteria

Moraxella ovis

1.21

0.2

0.1

non-IBD ***

 Proteobacteria

Burkholderia sp. CCGE1003

11.572222

4.75

1.142857

non-IBD

 Proteobacteria

Rhizobium leguminosarum

5.371875

1.307403

1.210941

non-IBD

 Bacteroidetes

Hymenobacter swuensis

1.1666667

3.979167

1.75

CD

 Bacteroidetes

Alistipes finegoldii

5.625

13.28889

0.997768

CD

 Bacteroidetes

Tenacibaculum dicentrarchi

1.2

2.604167

0.805195

CD

 Firmicutes

Flavonifractor plautii

1.2913257

11.15111

1.643084

CD

 Proteobacteria

Sandaracinus amylolyticus

0.6924342

1.424057

0.608021

CD

 Proteobacteria

Pandoraea pnomenusa

0.9506579

2.007981

0.736745

CD

 Bacteroidetes

Capnocytophaga sp. oral taxon 323

1.5625

0.57436

93

UC

 Proteobacteria

Burkholderia cepacia

0.6970721

0.515473

2.468487

UC

 Proteobacteria

Pannonibacter phragmitetus

0.912963

0.769207

1.817716

UC

 Proteobacteria

Devosia sp. H5989

0.7209405

0.761257

2.919889

UC

 Proteobacteria

[Haemophilus] ducreyi

0.7542442

0.385538

35.89216

UC

 Archaea

Methanobacterium sp. MB1

1.2109844

2.36367

3.378841

CD and UC

 Proteobacteria

Burkholderia pseudomallei

0.6134085

1.091992

1.097222

CD and UC

Preferential binding of IgG differs among non-IBD, CD, and UC patients

While there were limited changes in overall ICI between the groups, several bacterial taxa within each of the patient groups showed preference for binding IgG (Fig. 3c, Fig. 4b, Additional file 1: Figures S2, S3). Based on results from the shotgun sequencing libraries, IgG bound preferentially to Candidatus Filomicrobium marinum, Carnobacterium sp. CP1, Caulobacter sp. K31, Desulfatibacillum alkenivorans, Enterobacter cloacae, Burkholderia sp. CCGE1003, Pseudomonas sp. St29, and Rhizobium leguminosarum in non-IBD (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). A number of microbes did not display any preferential IgG binding between non-IBD and IBD groups (Additional file 1: Figure S2B). Aeromonas media, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and Streptomyces hygroscopicus display increased ICI in both CD and UC patients (Additional file 1: Figure S2C). Celeribacter indicus, Herbaspirillum hitneri, Hymenobacter swuensis, Alistipes finegoldii, Lacimicrobium alkaliphilum, Moraxella ovis, Ruminiclostridium thermocellum, Spharochaeta globose, Terriglobus roseus, Tenacibaculum dicentrarchi, Flavonifractor plautii, Sandaracinus amylolyticus, and Pandoraea pnomenusa in CD (Additional file 1: Figure S3A). Capnocytophaga sp. oral taxon 323, Burkholderia cepacia, Pannonibacter phragmitetus, Devosia sp. H5989, Rhodococcus equi, Thermobifida fusca, [Haemophilus] ducreyi, and Methanobacterium sp. MB1 in UC (Additional file 1: Figure S3B). Again, these changes in ICI were not associated with any changes in species abundance (Fig. 3c). Given the small numbers, many of these differences did not reach statistical significance by ANOVA with the exception of a significant reduction in ICI to Pseudomonas sp. St29 (p < 0.05) in IBD compared to non-IBD. Still, these findings do suggest that some bacterial species preferentially bind to IgG in a disease-specific manner.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Ratio of IgG+/IgG− binding (ICI) in shotgun metagenomic library patient samples. a The ICI for each species identified was calculated for non-IBD (n = 2), remission/mild CD (CDr/m; n = 2), moderate/severe CD (CDm/s; n = 2), remission/mild UC (UCr/m; n = 1), and moderate/severe UC (UCm/s; n = 2) and is expressed in a cladogram using log2-based heatmap coding. Red boxes highlight species selected for in vitro examination. b Ratio of IgG binding (ICI) for four of the bacterial species of interest in which each dot represents an individual patient, offering further validation

To identify potential microbes associated with CD or UC pathogenesis, as indicated by altered ICI, we examined changes in ileal mucosa-associated microbiota composition at different severity levels of the disease from remission/mild to moderate/severe inflammation, compared to non-IBD (Fig. 4a). Red boxes highlight the microbes selected for in vitro studies. While the number of patients per group here is too low to identify significant changes, results suggest a similar pattern to the changes described between non-IBD and total CD or UC and a possible “dose effect” (Fig. 3c, Additional file 1: Figures S2, S3).

The pathogenic potential of identified species offers proof of principle for IgG-binding pathobionts

A select series of microbes identified as having increased or decreased binding to IgG within the pediatric TI were examined in vitro to determine their invasive potential, as a surrogate for virulence and likelihood of inducing an immune response. The Proteobacterium B. cepacia demonstrated a 2.5-fold and 4.1-fold increase in the ICI in remission/mild (r/m) or moderate/severe (m/s) UC, respectively, compared to non-IBD (Fig. 4b). B. cepacia has previously been identified in the ileum of IBD cohorts [45] and has been reported to display pro-inflammatory effects and invasive potential in an in vitro model, supporting its pathobiont potential [46, 47]; however, it is not typically recognized as an intestinal pathogen or pathobiont. To further substantiate these results, we also examined the Firmicute species, F. plautii (increased ICI by 11.8-fold r/m; 5.5-fold m/s in CD), and Ruminococcus sp. (increased ICI by 2-fold m/s in CD; Fig. 4b), which we were able to isolate live from pediatric IBD patients. Both F. plautii and Ruminococcus have been mentioned in previous studies aimed at identifying gut microbes [48], while only Ruminococcus has been previously associated with human disease, including arthritic inflammation [49]. Interestingly, the Proteobacteria, Pseudomonas sp. ST29, previously studied in the rhizosphere of rice and potato [50], displayed a statistically significant decrease in ICI (2.1-fold in CD; 1.5-fold in UC). As we were unable to isolate live Pseudomonas sp. ST29, we purchased the related Pseudomonas protogens Pf-5 strain from ATCC, which displays 96% sequence homology as it was the closest isolate available. Pseudomonas protogens Pf-5 has been shown to display similar characteristics to St29 [51].

Fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5a) and gentamicin protection assay (Fig. 5b) were utilized as complementary approaches to examine the level of invasion of B. cepacia G143 25416, Burkholderia vietnamiensis DB01, Burkholderia ambifaria AMMD, F. plautii patient 94 (isolated from a CD patient), Ruminococcus sp. patient 94 (CD patient), Ruminococcus sp. patient 102 (non-IBD patient), and Pseudomonas protogens, along with adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC; positive invasion control), E. coli HB101 (negative commensal control), and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC; negative invasion control), into HT29-MTX-E12 cells. Results from microscopy visually demonstrated invasion of Burkholderia species, F. plautii patient 94, Ruminococcus sp. patient 94, and Ruminococcus sp. patient 102 into intestinal epithelial cells in culture (Fig. 5a). To quantitatively assess this invasive capacity, we performed gentamicin protection assays, which showed that B. cepacia (p < 0.001), B. ambifaria AMMD (p < 0.001), B. vietnamienesis (p < 0.0001), F. plautii patient 94 (p < 0.001), and Ruminococcus sp. patient 94 (p < 0.0001) are found within the E12 epithelial cells following 24-h infection at a similar level compared to the invasive AIEC (p < 0.001; Fig. 5b). Ruminococcus sp. patient 102 only demonstrated low levels of invasion following 24-h infection of E12 epithelial cells (p = 0.015). As expected, EHEC and HB101 did not demonstrate any significant level of invasiveness. Interestingly, P. protogens, which displayed reduced ICI in IBD, also did not display statistically significant levels of invasion.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

IgG-bound bacteria from IBD patients demonstrate invasive characteristics in human intestinal cell culture. Invasive capacity of Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia ambifaria, Flavonifractor plautii, Ruminococcus sp. patient 94 (CD), Ruminococcus sp. patient 102 (non-IBD), and Pseudomonas protogens in the HT29-MTX-E12 cell line was examined by a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a bacterial probe (orange), the e-cadherin (green) antibody, and DAPI (blue) stain (invasive bacteria identified by confocal microscopy Z-stacking are marked by white arrows) and b quantified using the gentamicin protection assay. c Activation of immune response was examined by qPCR of immune markers IL1β and IL6. LPS and AIEC were utilized as positive controls of immune activation and infection, respectively. Microscopy figures were imaged at × 63 magnification using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. Statistical analysis was performed by two-tailed t test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001; NI: no infection control

Furthermore, qPCR analysis demonstrated significant induction of the immune mediator, IL-6, in response to infection with B. cepacia (p < 0.05), B. vietnamiensis (p < 0.001), B. ambifaria (p < 0.05), Ruminococcus sp. patient 94 (p < 0.05), and P. protogens (p < 0.05; all relative to the negative control); this was comparable to the positive invasive control AIEC (p < 0.001) and LPS (p < 0.01; Fig. 5c). No significant change was found in IL-1β in any strain other than AIEC (p < 0.05). These findings support our hypothesis that binding to IgG is not random and is able to identify potential pathobionts, likely suggesting previous interaction of these specific bacteria with the host immune system.

Discussion

The contribution of microbiota to the pathogenesis of IBD has been well established [52–54]; however, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the mechanisms involved and in the development of specifically tailored treatments directed towards microbial composition and function [55, 56]. In order to develop a better understanding of the etiology of IBD, we must first understand the complex interactions between the microbiota of the gut and the uncontrolled immune response of the host. However, methods currently available for use in identifying pathobionts, which may make up only a small percentage of the gut microbiota, remain challenging due to the high species diversity and complexity, location of potential pathobionts within the gut, interpersonal and intrapersonal variability, wide spectrum of IBD phenotypes, effects of treatments, and variable methodologies. Another potential issue with the design of previous studies is the predominant focus on the microbiota of the stool [24, 57], which differ from those found at the mucosa. Mucosa-associated microbes are more likely to be involved in disease pathogenesis due to their proximity to the intestinal epithelium and the underlying immune system [58]. These issues were addressed in the current study by isolating large quantities of mucosa-associated microbes through intestinal washes combined with high throughput cell sorting techniques. This allowed us to focus on the microbes most likely to induce an immune response at the location they are most likely to be found.

The immune system of the human intestinal mucosa plays a critical role in maintaining a homeostatic environment by selectively identifying pathogenic microorganisms while aiding in the sustained growth of harmless/beneficial commensal microorganisms [28, 59]. Majority of immune receptors interact with bacteria via components such as lipopolysaccharides, which are present in both pathogenic and commensal bacteria [59]; therefore, the precise mechanism implemented by the immune system to differentiate pathogens from commensals is complex and requires both innate and adaptive responses. The immune system is thought to identify pathogens by detecting bacterial adhesive or invasive activities through various cell and receptor interactions [60, 61].

Studies have demonstrated that pathobionts are capable of penetrating both mucus and epithelial layers of the intestine, thereby interacting with, and activating, the immune system [62]. One important characteristic of the intestinal adaptive immune response is the production of large amounts of IgA or IgG antibodies, produced in response to invasive microorganisms [61]. We therefore hypothesized that the host IgG immune response, whereby IgG naturally binds to select gut microbes within the patient gut, could be used as a marker to identify bacteria more likely to be virulent and potentially involved in IBD pathogenesis.

Coating of bacteria with Ig has previously been investigated in IBD mouse models and in human patients [32, 63], although live culture or sequencing experiments have rarely been involved in these studies. While most of these studies have focused on IgA-bound bacteria, for the reasons highlighted in the “Introduction” section, we were interested in those naturally bound by IgG. Importantly, in attempts to better understand the origins of IBD, the focus of this study was on children with IBD as pediatric patients display more recent disease onset, relative lack of co-morbidities, more extensive phenotype [64], and reduced exposure to environmental confounders (e.g., smoking) [65, 66]. In order to examine the intestinal immune response to the gut microbiota of pediatric IBD patients, we collected mucosa-associated bacteria during endoscopy and then by IgG-based cell sorting identified taxa bound to IgG using Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomics libraries. A similar method has been used previously by our team and others [28, 67], and optimization of next-generation sequencing techniques has identified the use of 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic libraries as superior approaches for combining taxonomic identification with functional information for the study of the intestinal microbiome [67].

Little is known about the precise role of IgG binding of bacteria in IBD compared to normal controls. Unlike secretory IgA, it is unclear whether IgG is involved in the immune tolerance of intestinal microbiota as it is generally secreted in response to invading pathogens able to penetrate through the mucosal barrier. Recent evidence suggests, that under homeostatic conditions, symbiotic microbes can disseminate systemically, inducing an IgG response [68], primarily targeting Gram-negative bacteria. Our analysis indicates an increase in IgG binding by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, which are Gram-positive and Gram-negative, respectively, suggesting the potential for pathobionts disseminating and being detected outside of the lumen. CD patients have higher IgG-bound bacteria in stool, which has been suggested as a loss of mucosal tolerance [69]. However, our data suggests that these bacteria, recognized as more highly bound by IgG, may be pathobionts as the in vitro experiments show them to have increased invasion potential. These pathobionts likely play a role in promoting inflammation and/or altering the gut microenvironment to improve pathogenicity.

Here, we demonstrate that the binding of IgG favors different subsets of specific microbes in non-IBD, CD, or UC. The original study design aimed to assess multiple patient profiles using 16S rRNA gene approaches. These results offered only a limited taxonomical and functional resolution; therefore, the focus of the study was supplemented by shotgun metagenomics. The small number of patients examined proved to be a limitation in this study, especially for the shotgun metagenomics analysis (n = 9 in total; this was due to low quality and quantity DNA after FACS of luminal samples, leading to loss of DNA); however, this can be overcome in future studies designed to examine specific changes in microbiota while the current study provides proof of principle for the use of IgG as a marker of pathogenicity.

Interestingly, a number of species were found to display increased or decreased ICI within our patient cohort, which was found to be unrelated to any changes in species abundance within these samples (Figs. 2c and 3c, Additional file 1: Figures S2 and S3). Although there was great interpersonal-variability between the pediatric patients of each cohort, we found that the mucosa-associated bacteria that we identified with greater amounts of IgG binding included select species, some of which have known pathogenic potential or have been previously linked to inflammation, while others have not and are potential novel pathobionts. Use of IgG as a marker allowed for the identification of specific bacterial species, one of which, Burkholderia cepacia, has previously been identified in ileal biopsies taken from pediatric IBD patients [45]. We, therefore, chose to focus on B. cepacia to support our hypothesis and have demonstrated increased IgG binding of B. cepacia in UC patients compared to non-IBD patients. To further support these claims, we also examined the anaerobic bacteria F. plautii and Ruminococcus sp., which display increased ICI in CD patients compared to non-IBD patients and were isolated live from our pediatric cohort. When reintroduced into human intestinal cell cultures, these bacteria, which were more highly bound by IgG, demonstrated invasive capacity and induced a pro-inflammatory immune response; thus, our data suggest that IgG coating selectively labels inflammatory microorganisms potentially involved in IBD pathogenesis. Interestingly, we were able to isolate Ruminococcus sp. from both CD (pt 94) and non-IBD (pt 102) patients and results indicated that the species isolated from CD displayed greater invasive properties, indicating that differences in the microenvironment of the IBD gut may play a role in shaping the invasiveness of these microorganisms. We further supported the use of IgG as a marker of pathobionts in IBD by examining P. protogens, which displayed statistical significant reduction in ICI. P. protogens was not significantly invasive in vitro and elicited a minimal IL-6 response following infection.

Conclusions

Here, we verified that increased ICI depicts increased invasive capacity, demonstrating in proof of principle that our method of using ICI to identify bacteria that may be important in establishing and/or exacerbating the inflammation in IBD patients is valid. Larger studies are certainly required to confirm our findings and direct further research into novel pathobionts. Elucidating the role of specific bacterial species in IBD pathogenesis will underpin new strategies to improve our ability to direct therapies to those patients most likely to respond by utilizing personalized therapies targeted towards replacement or exclusion of those intestinal microbes involved in IBD development and progression. Furthermore, this technique has implications beyond the scope of the present study as alterations in the gut microbiota have been connected to a number of diseases from autism to cancer [15–23]. Utilizing the techniques validated in this study to identify potential pathobionts, or microbes recognized by the patient IgG, in other disease settings could prove to be a powerful tool in tailored therapeutic options for a large number of patients.

Materials and methods

Consent and ethics approval

Consent was obtained from patients/guardians, and the study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta (Study ID Pro00023820), Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Patient criteria and sample collection

Patients aged 3–18 years, with histological and endoscopic confirmed diagnosis of CD or UC, based on the revised Porto criteria [70] and the Paris classifications [66] were eligible to participate; non-IBD controls underwent colonoscopy for abdominal pain and/or diarrhea, but endoscopy and histology were completely normal, excluding the possibility of IBD. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were described previously [27, 71]. UC subjects endoscopically or histologically diagnosed with backwash ileitis were excluded from the study. For all patients, bowel cleansing was standardized using Picosalax® (sodium picosulfate and magnesium oxide) prior to endoscopy. Aspirate washes from the TI were collected from patients during endoscopy, and before biopsies were obtained at the Stollery Children’s Hospital, University of Alberta in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Protease inhibitor (1% v:v; Sigma Aldrich) was added immediately to the aspirate to prevent degradation and further purified by filtration (40-μm filters) and centrifugation at 200 g (5 min, 4 °C) to discard food particles and human cells. The supernatant-containing bacteria were washed thrice in PBS (14,000 g, 5 min, 4 °C) and fixed in 4% (v:v) paraformaldehyde for 1 h, then washed and stored in 0.2% (w:v) BSA/PBS.

Immunofluorescence of cytometry samples

All buffers and solutions used were filter-sterilized, and samples were washed in 0.2% (v:v) Tween-20 in PBS, including two centrifugation steps (3700 g, 10 min, 4 °C). Samples were blocked (5% w:v BSA/2% v:v goat serum) for 30 min, washed, and then aliquoted for staining.

For FACS Aria cell sorting and ImageStream image cytometry, samples were aliquoted to 3 groups: an unstained control, an IgG isotype control (Abcam; diluted 1:100; 2 μg/mL), and an anti-human IgG stained sample (Abcam; diluted 1:150; 3 μg/mL). Aliquots were washed and incubated with AlexaFluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen; diluted 1:300; 7 μg/mL). To identify live bacterial cell populations, aliquots containing IgG isotype and IgG were stained with either propidium iodide (PI; Life Technologies; diluted 1:5; 50 μg/mL) 15 min prior to sorting FACS Aria samples, or with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Thermo Fisher; diluted 1:1000; 1 μg/mL) immediately prior to image flow cytometry.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

The sensitivity of FACS to sort fluorescent bacteria from non-fluorescent bacteria was determined in initial setup of the protocol using E. coli HB101 (Additional file 1: Figure S1). E. coli HB101 were seeded at 1 × 106 (CFU/mL) and stained using a polyclonal rabbit anti-E. coli O&K lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antibody (Invitrogen; diluted 1:100; 2 μg/mL), washed and secondary stained with an FITC anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen; diluted 1:400; 5 μg/mL). Flow cytometry was utilized to detect LPS surface staining. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed on a co-culture of E. coli, and L. reuteri stained with an anti-E. coli LPS Ab. E. coli segregated by FACS were grown on MacConkey and MRS agar plates. The purity of both E. coli and L. reuteri samples separated by FACS was confirmed by qPCR. DNA extraction was performed using a QIAGEN DNeasy mini spin column kit, and subsequent real-time PCR was performed using primers targeted to E. coli (FWD: 5′CATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAA; RVS: 5′CGGGTAAACGTCAATGAGCAAA), and L. reuteri (FWD: 5′AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA; RVS: 5′CACCGCTACACATGGAG).

For fixed cell sorting of patient wash samples, the cell concentration was set at 25,000 events/s with a 70-μm nozzle (70 psi). The quadrants comprising of PI positive/IgG negative (PI+IgG−) and PI positive/IgG positive (PI+IgG+) were sorted from a quadrant plot and collected in 15-ml conical tubes (1 × 107 events per tube). Data were collected using a BD FACSAria III cytometer (BD Bioscience) equipped with the appropriate lasers. The sorted cells were centrifuged, and the pellet was frozen at − 80 °C for 16S rRNA gene or shotgun metagenomic analyses. Data files were analyzed using FlowJo V7 software (FlowJo LLC).

Image cytometry

In parallel to flow cytometry, a cohort of mucosal washings were stained and assessed by image cytometry to demonstrate the specificity of IgG antibody binding for the purpose of accurate cell sorting. A 60-μL aliquot was taken from a portion of patient samples prior to staining for FACS Aria. Samples were stained using the universal FISH probe EUB338 (diluted 1:100; 0.5 μg/mL; 5′G*CTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT-3′[Cy3]) [72]. Hybridization of bacterial cells in suspension was carried out in a water bath for 2 h at 50 °C (900 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 0.05% SDS [w:v]). Vials were washed for 5 min twice at 50 °C (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 0.006% SDS [w:v]) and then blocked for 30 min (5% [v:v] goat serum and 2% [w:v] bovine serum albumin). Samples were then stained using the IgG (Abcam; diluted 1:100; 3 μg/mL) antibody followed by AlexaFluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary (Life Technologies; diluted 1:400; 7 μg/mL). Vials were stringently washed between steps thrice with 0.05% (v:v) Tween-20. To determine the presence of bacterial DNA, vials were counterstained with DAPI (diluted 1:1000; 1 μg/mL) for 1 min.

The Amnis ImagestreamX mkII was used for acquisition performed at × 60 magnification on a low-speed setting with a total of 100,000 events collected. For gating compensation, each run included controls stained only with DAPI, EUB338, or anti-IgG. Samples were gated on selecting singlet events of DNA-positive bacteria. IDEAS Software version 6.1 (Amnis) was employed for analysis as previously described [73].

NGS libraries construction and bioinformatics

16S rRNA gene library

DNA extraction was performed using the QIAGEN DNeasy mini spin column kit. Library construction, sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis were conducted as described in Alipour et al., 2016 [27, 74, 75]. In brief, the cDNA created from bacterial isolates of intestinal washes was used as template DNA using primers targeted towards the V3 and V4 variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene in a nested PCR [Forward 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGC CTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′;Reverse 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTAC HVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′]. A 25-cycle PCR was run (denature 95 °C [30 s], anneal 55 °C [30 s], elongation 72 °C [30 s]), and PCR amplicons were purified using AMPure XP paramagnetic beads [Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA]. For profiling of bacteria in total aspirate washes, or in fractions thereof that did or did not bind anti-IgG, the V3–V4 regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene were PCR amplified and sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina), according to procedures described in the 16S Sample Preparation Guide 15044223 A (Illumina, San Diego, CA). In brief, ~ 1 ng of microbial DNA was used for a gene-specific PCR with primers containing an Illumina linker at its 5′ moiety for 25 cycles. This produced an amplicon of approximately 550 bp flanked by the Illumina linkers. Subsequently, an indexing PCR was conducted for 18 cycles using primers flanked by Illumina NexteraXT adapters, suitable for binding to oligos on the flow-cell of the MiSeq instrument. Libraries were then cleaned up with AMPure paramagnetic beads, and quantified using a protocol that combines the average size of the library as measured in a 2100 Agilent Bioanalyzer instrument and the dsDNA concentration as determined by Qubit. Sequencing was conducted using a demultiplexing and adapter trimming protocol with a 600 cycles V3 sequencing kit (Illumina).

For bioinformatics analysis, sequences were inspected and per-base quality scores determined. Sequencing primers were removed and additional bases at the 5′ and 3′ ends of each sequence were trimmed off when quality scores (Q) were < 20. Sequences were further processed using the QIIME pipeline. Sequences were clustered into OTUs using UCLUST, chimeric sequences were removed with USEARCH, and taxonomy assignments done with the RDP classifier [67].

Shotgun metagenomics

Shotgun libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT® kit (Illumina) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Five microliters of 0.2 ng/μl microbial genomic DNA was supplemented with 10 μl of TD buffer and 5 μl of ATM buffer, for tagmentation at 55 °C for 5 min. The reaction was neutralized by adding 5 μl of NT buffer and then incubated for 5 min at RT. Tagmented DNA was supplemented with 15 μl of Nextera PCR master mix (NPM) and 5 μl of each indexing oligo and then subjected to PCR amplification for 12 cycles. Libraries were cleaned up, quantified, and sequenced as described for 16S rRNA gene libraries. Sequencing adapters trimming and demultiplexing of libraries were conducted in-instrument. Sequences were taxonomically classified with KraKEN [45, 74] using a customized database containing full-genome sequences of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi, protozoa (refseq database from NCBI), and the human genome assembly GRCh38. Sequences abundance was re-estimated using Bracken (Bayesian Reestimation of Abundance after Classification with KrakEN) [75].

Bacterial strains and cell line culturing conditions

The HT-MTX29-E12 cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection. E12 cells were maintained in RPMI supplemented with Fetal bovine serum (10%, v:v) and penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco; 100 μg/mL) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Bacterial strains Burkholderia cepacia G143 25416, Burkholderia vietnamiensis DB01, and Burkholderia ambifaria AMMD were generously provided by Dr. Jonathan Dennis (University of Alberta). The strains were grown on 50% Luria-Bertani growth medium (12.5 g/L; BD biosciences) at 37 °C.

Pseudomonas protogens was purchased from the ATCC and was cultured at 30–37 °C in LB media.

Escherichia coli HB101, enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157:H7, and adhesive invasive E. coli (AIEC) LF82 were cultured in LB at 37 °C.

Lactobacillus reuteri was cultured in MRS medium at 37 °C. All strains above were grown under aerobic conditions.

Bacterial strains Flavonifractor plautii patient 94, Rumminococcus sp. patient 94, and Rumminococcus sp. patient 102 were isolated live from a patient with Crohn disease (patient 94) or non-IBD (patient 102) by growing cultures for individual colonies on BHI plates under anaerobic conditions. Individual colonies were isolated and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Bacterial infection

Bacterial isolates were grown on LB agar plates at room 37 °C. When visible growth was observed, a single colony was grown in LB liquid medium overnight. An OD600 of 0.1 (approx. 1 × 108 cfu/mL) was inoculated to 10 mL Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies) supplemented with 15 mM Hepes (Gibco) and 1% (v:v) non-essential amino acid (NEAA) supplement (Gibco) and grown overnight prior to infection of human epithelial cells. Human epithelial cell cultures were inoculated with bacteria (roughly 120:1 multiplicity of infection) or left uninfected. Infection was carried out at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 hs.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

FISH was performed on the E12 human intestinal epithelial cell line seeded on 12-mm glass coverslips, post-infection, using the universal FISH probe EUB338 (diluted 1:100; 0.5 μg/mL). For aerobe cultures, bacteria were pre-stained with EUB338 for 2 h prior to infection to reduce background staining. For anaerobes, staining with EUB338 was performed following infection.

Following infection, the non-adhered bacteria were aspirated and replaced with growth medium containing 100 μg/mL of gentamicin for 2 h to inhibit extracellular overgrowth (all bacterial strains were confirmed to be sensitive to gentamicin). Supernatants were then aspirated and cells were washed in PBS, fixed, and permeabilized using 4% (v:v) paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature. Coverslips were stained using the common primer probe EUB338 (diluted 1:100; 0.5 μg/mL) through the process of hybridization (buffer: 0.02 M Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 0.9 M NaCl, 5% [v:v] formamide, 0.05% [w:v] SDS) at 40 °C for 2 h and then washed (buffer: 0.02 M Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 0.66 M NaCl, 0.006% [w:v] SDS) at 40 °C for 10 min. To visualize human epithelial cells, coverslips were blocked (buffer 2% [v:v] goat serum, 1% [w:v] BSA) for 30 min and stained by immunofluorescence using Philloidin 488 antibody (diluted 1:40; 6 μg/mL in 0.2% [v:v] goat serum, 0.1% [w:v] BSA; BD Bioscience) for 1 h, followed by 1 min DAPI stain to highlight bacteria and epithelial cell nuclei (diluted 1:1000; 1 μg/mL). Mounted coverslips were visualized on the Zeiss Fluorescence microscopy system after allowing fluorescent stain to develop for 24 h.

Gentamicin protection assay

Following infection of the human intestinal epithelial cell line HT29-MTX-E12, non-adhered bacteria were aspirated and replaced with growth medium containing 100 μg/mL of gentamicin for 2 h to kill all remaining extracellular bacteria (gentamicin is not lipophilic and therefore, does not penetrate the eukaryotic cell membrane; as a result, invasive bacteria were unaffected. Invasive bacteria were collected by lysing human cells with 50% (v:v) TritonX-200 for 5 min at room temperature, followed by serial dilutions and plating on LB ampicillin (50 μg/mL) agar plates, grown overnight at 37 °C, to quantify bacterial invasion by colony forming units by manual counting.

qPCR for cytokine response to infection

RNA was isolated from E-12 cells as previously described [76] following 24 h infection with AIEC, B. cepacia, B. vietnamiensis, or B. ambifaria as indicated. LPS (10 nM) was utilized as a positive control for immune activation. RT-PCR was performed as previously described [76]. Both biological and technical replicates were performed on all reaction using primers for the following genes: GAPDH, IL-1β, and IL-6 (Table 2). Data were analyzed using CFX Manager Software Version 3.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
Table 2

Primer sequences

Primer target

FWD sequence

REV sequence

GAPDH

5′-CCC ACT CCT CCA CCT TTG AC-3′

5′-ATG AGG TCC ACC ACC CTG TT-3′

IL1β

5′-TCC GAC CAC CAC TAC AGC AA-3′

5′-ATC TTT CAA CAC GCA GGA CA-3′

IL6

5′-CCA CAC AGA CAG CCA CTC AC-3′

5′-AGG TTG TTT TCT GCC AGT GC-3′

Data analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The statistical analyses were performed using InStat 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Comparisons between the means of 3 or more groups were made with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. Significance: one asterisk, p < 0.05; two asterisks, p < 0.01; and three asterisks p < 0.001.

Statistical significance of qPCR was evaluated by unpaired t test with Welch’s correction using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software).

Abbreviations

BSA: 

Bovine serum albumin

CD: 

Crohn disease

DAPI: 

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

FACS: 

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

FISH: 

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

IBD: 

Inflammatory bowel diseases

IgG: 

Immunoglobulin G

IL: 

Interleukin

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

TI: 

Terminal ileum

UC: 

Ulcerative colitis

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We graciously thank the patients and their families for agreeing to participate and provide samples, as well as the IBD research coordinators, nurses, and endoscopy staff at Stollery Children’s Hospital. We would like to acknowledge The Applied Genomic Core and the Flow Cytometry Core at the University of Alberta for their help in experiment preparations and technical procedures. We also thank CEGIIR for providing material support and Dr. Jonathan Dennis for providing the Burkholderia bacterial strains.

Availability of data and materials

SRA definitive accession number of our data is SRP153068.

Grant support

This work was supported by grants awarded to EW and LD by Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions (AIHS), and Women & Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI). Infrastructure in EW’s laboratory is funded by the Centre of Excellence for Gastrointestinal Inflammation and Immunity Research (CEGIIR) at the University of Alberta. MA was supported by Postdoctoral Fellowships from Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CIHR/CAG) and AIHS. The funders had no role in study design, collection, or interpretation of data.

Authors’ contributions

HA, MA, RV, YL, CE, and EW conceived and designed the experiments. HA, MA, MBJ, DZ, MWC, HQH, and EW acquired the patient consent, and collected and processed mucosal washings. HA, MA, RV, PS, DL, JeJ, and MBJ performed the experiments. HA and JuJ were responsible for the figure preparation and statistical analyses. AM, GW, KM, and LD provided additional supervision and oversight. HA and EW drafted the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent was obtained from patients/guardians, and the study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta (Study ID Pro00023820), Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Consent for publication

All authors grant consent for the publication of the data within this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
CEGIIR, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2X8, Canada
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Room 4-577, 11405 87th Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
(3)
Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
(4)
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
(5)
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
(6)
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada

References

  1. Graham DB, Xavier RJ. From genetics of inflammatory bowel disease towards mechanistic insights. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:371–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ruel J, Ruane D, Mehandru S, Gower-Rousseau C, Colombel JF. IBD across the age spectrum: is it the same disease? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:88–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Benchimol EI, Mack DR, Nguyen GC, Snapper SB, Li W, Mojaverian N, Quach P, Muise AM. Incidence, outcomes, and health services burden of very early onset inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:803–813 e807 quiz e814–805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:720–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rocchi A, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Feagan B, Panaccione R, Glasgow KW, Fernandes A, Ghosh S. Inflammatory bowel disease: a Canadian burden of illness review. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26:811–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Carroll MW, Singh H, Otley AR, Vutcovici M, El-Matary W, Nguyen GC, Griffiths AM, et al. Trends in epidemiology of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: distributed network analysis of multiple population-based provincial health administrative databases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:1120–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Abu Freha N, Schwartz D, Elkrinawi J, Ben Yakov G, Abu Tailakh M, Munteanu D, Abu Ganim A, Fich A. Inflammatory bowel disease among Bedouin Arabs in southern Israel: urbanization and increasing prevalence rates. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27:230–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ng SC. Emerging leadership lecture: inflammatory bowel disease in Asia: emergence of a “Western” disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:440–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gasparetto M, Guariso G. Highlights in IBD epidemiology and its natural history in the paediatric age. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:829040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Benchimol EI, Mack DR, Guttmann A, Nguyen GC, To T, Mojaverian N, Quach P, Manuel DG. Inflammatory bowel disease in immigrants to Canada and their children: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:553–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wine E. Should we be treating the bugs instead of cytokines and T cells? Dig Dis. 2014;32:403–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Aujnarain A, Mack DR, Benchimol EI. The role of the environment in the development of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2013;15:326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Levine A, Wine E. Effects of enteral nutrition on Crohn’s disease: clues to the impact of diet on disease pathogenesis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:1322–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Alkadhi S, Kunde D, Cheluvappa R, Randall-Demllo S, Eri R. The murine appendiceal microbiome is altered in spontaneous colitis and its pathological progression. Gut Pathog. 2014;6:25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444:1022–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang B, Jiang X, Cao M, Ge J, Bao Q, Tang L, Chen Y, Li L. Altered fecal microbiota correlates with liver biochemistry in nonobese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Armstrong H, Bording-Jorgensen M, Dijk S, Wine E. The complex interplay between chronic inflammation, the microbiome, and cancer: understanding disease progression and what we can do to prevent it. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(3):E83. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10030083.
  18. Macpherson AJ, Harris NL. Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:478–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Finlay BB. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:859–904.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Q, Duan ZP, Ha DK, Bengmark S, Kurtovic J, Riordan SM. Synbiotic modulation of gut flora: effect on minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2004;39:1441–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Scanlan PD, Shanahan F, Clune Y, Collins JK, O’Sullivan GC, O’Riordan M, Holmes E, Wang Y, Marchesi JR. Culture-independent analysis of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer and polyposis. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:789–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Finegold SM, Molitoris D, Song Y, Liu C, Vaisanen ML, Bolte E, McTeague M, Sandler R, Wexler H, Marlowe EM, et al. Gastrointestinal microflora studies in late-onset autism. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:S6–S16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wen L, Ley RE, Volchkov PY, Stranges PB, Avanesyan L, Stonebraker AC, Hu C, Wong FS, Szot GL, Bluestone JA, et al. Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of type 1 diabetes. Nature. 2008;455:1109–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Michail S, Durbin M, Turner D, Griffiths AM, Mack DR, Hyams J, Leleiko N, Kenche H, Stolfi A, Wine E. Alterations in the gut microbiome of children with severe ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1799–808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Pabst O. New concepts in the generation and functions of IgA. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:821–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Slack E, Balmer ML, Fritz JH, Hapfelmeier S. Functional flexibility of intestinal IgA - broadening the fine line. Front Immunol. 2012;3:100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Alipour M, Zaidi D, Valcheva R, Jovel J, Martinez I, Sergi C, Walter J, Mason AL, Wong GK, Dieleman LA, et al. Mucosal barrier depletion and loss of bacterial diversity are primary abnormalities in paediatric ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:462–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Palm NW, de Zoete MR, Cullen TW, Barry NA, Stefanowski J, Hao L, Degnan PH, Hu J, Peter I, Zhang W, et al. Immunoglobulin A coating identifies colitogenic bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2014;158:1000–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Leake I. IBD: microbial drivers of IBD identified by levels of IgA coating. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11:642.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. D’Auria G, Peris-Bondia F, Dzunkova M, Mira A, Collado MC, Latorre A, Moya A. Active and secreted IgA-coated bacterial fractions from the human gut reveal an under-represented microbiota core. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gommerman JL, Rojas OL, Fritz JH. Re-thinking the functions of IgA(+) plasma cells. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:652–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Waaij LA, Kroese FG, Visser A, Nelis GF, Westerveld BD, Jansen PL, Hunter JO. Immunoglobulin coating of faecal bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:669–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Harmsen HJ, Pouwels SD, Funke A, Bos NA, Dijkstra G. Crohn’s disease patients have more IgG-binding fecal bacteria than controls. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:515–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Mahony S, Barton JR, Crichton S, Ferguson A. Appraisal of gut lavage in the study of intestinal humoral immunity. Gut. 1990;31:1341–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Brandtzaeg P. Update on mucosal immunoglobulin A in gastrointestinal disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:554–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Benckert J, Schmolka N, Kreschel C, Zoller MJ, Sturm A, Wiedenmann B, Wardemann H. The majority of intestinal IgA+ and IgG+ plasmablasts in the human gut are antigen-specific. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1946–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Macpherson A, Khoo UY, Forgacs I, Philpott-Howard J, Bjarnason I. Mucosal antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease are directed against intestinal bacteria. Gut. 1996;38:365–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Main J, McKenzie H, Yeaman GR, Kerr MA, Robson D, Pennington CR, Parratt D. Antibody to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (bakers’ yeast) in Crohn’s disease. BMJ. 1988;297:1105–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Sendid B, Colombel JF, Jacquinot PM, Faille C, Fruit J, Cortot A, Lucidarme D, Camus D, Poulain D. Specific antibody response to oligomannosidic epitopes in Crohn’s disease. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996;3:219–26.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Merga Y, Campbell BJ, Rhodes JM. Mucosal barrier, bacteria and inflammatory bowel disease: possibilities for therapy. Dig Dis. 2014;32:475–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Macfarlane S, Furrie E, Kennedy A, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Mucosal bacteria in ulcerative colitis. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(Suppl 1):S67–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Manfredo Vieira S, Hiltensperger M, Kumar V, Zegarra-Ruiz D, Dehner C, Khan N, Costa FRC, Tiniakou E, Greiling T, Ruff W, et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science. 2018;359:1156–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Suez J, Zmora N, Zilberman-Schapira G, Mor U, Dori-Bachash M, Bashiardes S, Zur M, Regev-Lehavi D, Ben-Zeev Brik R, Federici S, et al. Post-antibiotic gut mucosal microbiome reconstitution is impaired by probiotics and improved by autologous FMT. Cell. 2018;174:1406–1423 e1416.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zmora N, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, Mor U, Dori-Bachash M, Bashiardes S, Kotler E, Zur M, Regev-Lehavi D, Brik RB, et al. Personalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome features. Cell. 2018;174:1388–1405 e1321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sim WH, Wagner J, Cameron DJ, Catto-Smith AG, Bishop RF, Kirkwood CD. Novel Burkholderiales 23S rRNA genes identified in ileal biopsy samples from children: preliminary evidence that a subtype is associated with perianal Crohn’s disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1939–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin DW, Mohr CD. Invasion and intracellular survival of Burkholderia cepacia. Infect Immun. 2000;68:24–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Fink J, Steer JH, Joyce DA, McWilliam AS, Stewart GA. Pro-inflammatory effects of Burkholderia cepacia on cystic fibrosis respiratory epithelium. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:273–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Joossens M, Huys G, Cnockaert M, De Preter V, Verbeke K, Rutgeerts P, Vandamme P, Vermeire S. Dysbiosis of the faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn’s disease and their unaffected relatives. Gut. 2011;60:631–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Scher JU, Ubeda C, Artacho A, Attur M, Isaac S, Reddy SM, Marmon S, Neimann A, Brusca S, Patel T, et al. Decreased bacterial diversity characterizes the altered gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis, resembling dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:128–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Takeuchi K, Noda N, Katayose Y, Mukai Y, Numa H, Yamada K, Someya N. Rhizoxin analogs contribute to the biocontrol activity of a newly isolated pseudomonas strain. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2015;28:333–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Moruzzi S, Firrao G, Polano C, Borselli S, Loschi A, Ermacora P, Loi N, Martini M. Genomic-assisted characterisation of Pseudomonas sp. strain Pf4, a potential biocontrol agent in hydroponics. Biocontrol Sci Tech. 2017;27:969–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Aleksandrova K, Romero-Mosquera B, Hernandez V. Diet, gut microbiome and epigenetics: emerging links with inflammatory bowel diseases and prospects for management and prevention. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):E962. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9090962.
  53. Dickson I. Gut microbiota: diagnosing IBD with the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14:195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Halfvarson J, Brislawn CJ, Lamendella R, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Walters WA, Bramer LM, D’Amato M, Bonfiglio F, McDonald D, Gonzalez A, et al. Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2:17004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Cho JH, Weaver CT. The genetics of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1327–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Integrative HMPRNC. The Integrative human microbiome project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:276–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto JM, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Oh PL, Martinez I, Sun Y, Walter J, Peterson DA, Mercer DF. Characterization of the ileal microbiota in rejecting and nonrejecting recipients of small bowel transplants. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:753–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Sansonetti PJ. To be or not to be a pathogen: that is the mucosally relevant question. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:8–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Cerutti A, Rescigno M. The biology of intestinal immunoglobulin a responses. Immunity. 2008;28:740–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Berrilli F, Di Cave D, Cavallero S, D’Amelio S. Interactions between parasites and microbial communities in the human gut. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsuruta T, Inoue R, Iwanaga T, Hara H, Yajima T. Development of a method for the identification of S-IgA-coated bacterial composition in mouse and human feces. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74:968–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Israeli E, Ryan JD, Shafer LA, Bernstein CN. Younger age at diagnosis is associated with panenteric, but not more aggressive, Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:72–79 e71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. De Greef E, Mahachie John JM, Hoffman I, Smets F, Van Biervliet S, Scaillon M, Hauser B, Paquot I, Alliet P, Arts W, et al. Profile of pediatric Crohn’s disease in Belgium. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:e588–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Levine A, Griffiths A, Markowitz J, Wilson DC, Turner D, Russell RK, Fell J, Ruemmele FM, Walters T, Sherlock M, et al. Pediatric modification of the Montreal classification for inflammatory bowel disease: the Paris classification. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1314–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Jovel J, Patterson J, Wang W, Hotte N, O’Keefe S, Mitchel T, Perry T, Kao D, Mason AL, Madsen KL, Wong GK. Characterization of the gut microbiome using 16S or shotgun metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:459.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeng MY, Cisalpino D, Varadarajan S, Hellman J, Warren HS, Cascalho M, Inohara N, Nunez G. Gut microbiota-induced immunoglobulin G controls systemic infection by symbiotic bacteria and pathogens. Immunity. 2016;44:647–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Butto LF, Schaubeck M, Haller D. Mechanisms of microbe-host interaction in Crohn’s disease: dysbiosis vs. pathobiont selection. Front Immunol. 2015;6:555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Levine A, Turner D, Pfeffer Gik T, Amil Dias J, Veres G, Shaoul R, Staiano A, Escher J, Kolho KL, Paerregaard A, et al. Comparison of outcomes parameters for induction of remission in new onset pediatric Crohn’s disease: evaluation of the Porto IBD group “growth relapse and outcomes with therapy” (GROWTH CD) study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:278–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Zaidi D, Churchill L, Huynh HQ, Carroll MW, Persad R, Wine E. Capillary flow rates in the duodenum of pediatric ulcerative colitis patients are increased and unrelated to inflammation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65:306–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Amann RI, Binder BJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:1919–25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Rieger AM, Hall BE, Barreda DR. Macrophage activation differentially modulates particle binding, phagocytosis and downstream antimicrobial mechanisms. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:1144–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Lu JB, FP TP, Salzberg SL. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. Peer J Comput Sci. 2017;3:e104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Gillis JL, Selth LA, Centenera MM, Townley SL, Sun S, Plymate SR, Tilley WD, Butler LM. Constitutively-active androgen receptor variants function independently of the HSP90 chaperone but do not confer resistance to HSP90 inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2013;4:691–704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us