- Open Access
Interactions between a pathogenic Blastocystis subtype and gut microbiota: in vitro and in vivo studies
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 16 November 2018
- Accepted: 1 February 2019
- Published: 11 March 2019
Blastocystis is a common gut eukaryote detected in humans and animals. It has been associated with gastrointestinal disease in the past although recent metagenomic studies also suggest that it is a member of normal microbiota. This study investigates interactions between pathogenic human isolates belonging to Blastocystis subtype 7 (ST7) and bacterial representatives of the gut microbiota.
Generally, Blastocystis ST7 exerts a positive effect on the viability of representative gut bacteria except on Bifidobacterium longum. Gene expression analysis and flow cytometry indicate that the bacterium may be undergoing oxidative stress in the presence of Blastocystis. In vitro assays demonstrate that Blastocystis-induced host responses are able to decrease Bifidobacterium counts. Mice infected with Blastocystis also reveal a decrease in beneficial bacteria Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus.
This study shows that particular isolates of Blastocystis ST7 cause changes in microbiota populations and potentially lead to an imbalance of the gut microbiota. This study suggests that certain isolates of Blastocystis exert their pathogenic effects through disruption of the gut microbiota and provides a counterpoint to the increasing reports indicating the commensal nature of this ubiquitous parasite.
- Gut microbiota
Blastocystis is a common gut eukaryote detected in human and many animal hosts [1, 2]. It is classified under the group Stramenopiles which mostly comprises unicellular flagellated or ciliated free-living organisms [2, 3]. Blastocystis, however, is an obligately anaerobic and parasitic protist and is transmitted via the fecal-oral route . Estimates put the number of individuals infected by this parasite to more than 1 billion worldwide . Although it is more common in developing countries, surveys in developed countries often indicate prevalence rates of more than 5% in the general population . The role of Blastocystis in disease has been the subject of many investigations. There are studies associating it with symptoms of a gastrointestinal disease [6–8] while others could not find the basis for defining it as pathogenic [9, 10]. More recently, infection with Blastocystis has been linked with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)  and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) . There are however conflicting reports on whether Blastocystis was really the sole causative agent in these cases [12–15]. In another perspective, IBS [16–18] and IBD [19, 20] were also linked to the disruption of the gut microbiota or dysbiosis. Blastocystis’ role in IBS or IBD may thus be mediated by altering gut microbiota composition. However, the few microbiome studies on Blastocystis generally identified it as a common commensal in the human gut. These analyses associated the presence of Blastocystis with higher diversity of gut microbiota [21–24]. However, one study indicated that it caused a decrease in beneficial bacteria particularly Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus spp. . These discrepancies may be due to the complex nature of Blastocystis wherein several genetically distinct subtypes (ST) exist. Different Blastocystis STs could exhibit different growth rates, drug susceptibilities, host ranges, and other biological features [1, 26]. These differences could therefore influence the protist’s influence on the gut microbiota. Indeed, it has been suggested that microbiota composition in relation to Blastocystis may be dependent on the organism’s subtype identity .
With these in mind, the current study explored the interactions between a particular ST of Blastocystis, ST7, and prokaryotic representatives of the gut microbiota. ST7 isolates possess pathogenic properties not observed in other STs. For example, drug susceptibility assays indicated that ST7 isolates are resistant to metronidazole, the usual drug of choice to clear protistan parasites . In vitro culture assays also revealed that ST7, but not ST4 isolates, could compromise the intestinal epithelial barrier . In vivo experiments also revealed that isolates from this ST could cause tissue damage in the mouse intestines . This ST appears rarely in surveys but has been reported to be strongly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms . We used co-culture experiments to determine the effect of Blastocystis ST7 isolates on the viability of select gut bacteria representatives. Biological assays as well as gene expression analyses were used to investigate a possible mechanism on how Blastocystis affect these bacterial populations. Lastly, we conducted in vivo experiments involving infection of mice with Blastocystis and subsequent analyses of bacterial content in the fecal samples. The results of this study indicated that Blastocystis can disrupt gut microbiota populations particularly decreasing the content of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus but increasing Escherichia coli. Possible explanations of these occurrences point to oxidative stress caused by Blastocystis as well as host factors induced by the parasite. Our data indicates that while Blastocystis spp. may be a member of healthy gut microbiota, specific isolates or rare ST may disrupt homeostasis leading to pathological states in the host.
Human Blastocystis isolates were acquired from patients at the Singapore General Hospital in the early 1990s before the Institutional Review Board was established at the National University of Singapore (NUS). Blastocystis ST7 isolates B and H are maintained at a microbial collection at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology of the NUS. Both isolates ST7-B and ST7-H were axenized previously  and maintained in 8 ml pre-reduced Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) (Gibco) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% horse serum (Gibco). These were incubated in anaerobic jars (Oxoid) with Anaerogen gas packs (Oxoid) at 37 °C and subcultured every 3–4 days. Blastocystis cell counts were done manually using hemocytometer (Kova International).
Escherichia coli ATCC 11775, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, and Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 were cultured and maintained in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and agar (Sigma). Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15707 and Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 14869 were cultured and maintained in Bifidus selective medium (BSM) (Sigma) and deMan, Rogosa, Sharpe (MRS) medium (Sigma), respectively, in broth and agar forms. B. fragilis and B. longum were maintained in anaerobic condition inside anaerobic jars (Oxoid) with Anaerogen gas packs (Oxoid). All cultures were incubated at 37 °C. Absorbance readings of bacterial broth cultures prior to experiments were done using Tecan Infinite F200 microplate reader.
Blastocystis cells and bacterial cells were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 1000×g for 10 min. A concentration of 1 × 107 cells/ml of Blastocystis ST7-B or ST7-H and 1 × 109 CFU/ml of bacteria (E. coli, E. faecalis, B. longum, L. brevis, B. subtilis, or B. fragilis) was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in pre-reduced PBS. Controls with only 1 × 107 cells/ml Blastocystis and only 1 × 109 CFU/ml bacteria, both re-suspended in pre-reduced PBS, were also incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After 24 h, Blastocystis cells were counted using a hemocytometer (Kova International) after a 50-fold dilution of the neat cultures. A drop plate method was utilized for the enumeration of bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs) . Bacterial colony-forming unit per milliliter was determined when the colonies appeared on the agar plates.
B. longum ROS staining and flow cytometry
To determine cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) content in B. longum cells, the stain 2′,7′–dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA) (Sigma) was used at a concentration of 20 μM for 30 min at 37 °C. Before the co-culture experiment, B. longum cells were stained with Baclight Red (Thermofisher) at a concentration of 1 μM for 15 min at room temperature to be able to gate for these cells in flow cytometry. The cells were run in Attune Nxt Flow Cytometer (Life Technologies) using blue (488 nm) and yellow (561 nm) lasers.
B. longum oxidoreductases genes expression analysis
mRNA from B. longum cells were extracted using RNAzol RT (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using iScript cDNA kit (Bio-Rad). The gene expression of Bifidobacterium oxidoreductases were determined in a qPCR assay using primers reported previously . SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) was used and amplifications performed in an iCycler thermocycler with iQ5 attachment (Bio-Rad).
Cells were maintained in T-75 flasks (Corning) in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Culture medium consisted of 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco) and 1% each of sodium pyruvate (Gibco), non-essential amino acids (Gibco), and penicillin-streptomycin in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Scientific). HT-29 cells were then used for co-culture experiments with Blastocystis and B. longum at 1 × 106 cells/ml and 1 × 109 CFU/ml, respectively.
Epithelial permeability measurement
HT-29 Cells were seeded with complete medium onto Millicell hanging cell culture insert with 0.4-μm-sized pores (Merck) placed on 6-well plates (Greiner). After reaching confluence, the monolayers were stimulated for 48 h with 3 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma-Aldrich) in serum-free medium. Conditioning of differentiated HT-29 monolayers by Blastocystis was performed for 24 h at 37 °C in anaerobic condition. Incubation of the HT-29 monolayers with B. longum was performed for 6 h for viability determination. Transepithelial electrical resistance across the monolayers was measured using Millipore-ERS-2 volt-ohm-meter. Flux assay was performed using fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Dextran 4000 (FITC-Dextran) (Sigma). The assay included washing of the monolayer on the inserts twice with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Thermofisher). FITC-Dextran at a concentration of 100 μg/ml in HBSS was added on the apical compartment, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C. The buffer at the basolateral compartment was collected after 1 h and transferred to a black 96-well plate (Nunc). Fluorescence was measured using Tecan Infinite F200 microplate reader at excitation and emission wavelengths of 492 nm and 518 nm, respectively.
Acute infection of Blastocystis in a mouse model
The animal experiments were performed according to the Singapore National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research guidelines. The protocol (R13-5890) was approved by the NUS Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The infection of Blastocystis into mice was carried out according to a previous protocol . C57BL/6 male mice, aged 5 to 6 weeks, were given 2% DSS in drinking water for 4 days followed by a recovery period of 5 days. After the recovery period, they were injected with 5 × 107 live Blastocystis cells intracecally. The mice were subjected to anesthesia (ketamine 75 mg/kg + medetomidine 1 mg/kg via intraperitoneal (IP) injection) then a vertical incision was made on the abdomen. The cecum was exteriorized, and 50 μl Blastocystis suspended in PBS was injected into the caecum using a 27G needle. Sham surgical controls were injected with 50 μl PBS intracecally. The incision was then closed with two layers of sutures. Subsequently, anesthesia was reversed (Atipamezole 1 mg/kg via subcutaneous (SC) injection), and antibiotics (Enrofloxacin10 mg/kg SC) and analgesic (Carprofen 5 mg/kg SC) were given. Fecal samples were collected at various time-points—before surgery at day 0, day 1 post-infection, day 2 post-infection, and day 3 post-infection. A total of 24 mice were included, with 8 mice in each of the 3 groups—control, ST7-B-infected and ST7-H-infected. The rest of the mice were euthanized on day 3 post-infection. The colon and cecum were extracted for histology.
Determination of bacterial abundance in mice fecal samples
DNA primers used for qPCR assay to determine the relative abundance of bacterial group in mice fecal samples
Sequences (5′ → 3′)
16S rRNA (total bacteria)
Comparisons of two groups were done using Student’s t test for paired samples. Comparisons of more than two groups were done using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Analyses and generation of graphs were done using Prism GraphPad version 5.
Gut bacteria exerted positive effects on Blastocystis cell count in vitro
Blastocystis exerted positive effects on some gut bacteria in vitro
The CFU counts of E. coli, E. faecalis, L. brevis, B. longum, B. subtilis, and B. fragilis were also examined when they were co-incubated with Blastocystis ST7-B and ST7-H. Gut commensal bacteria colony-forming unit per milliliter values were generally higher when co-incubated with Blastocystis cells. Representative images of the bacterial colonies on agar plates for the co-incubation assay are shown (Fig. 1b). E. coli, E. faecalis, B. fragilis, and B. subtilis had significantly higher CFU count when co-incubated with both ST7-B and ST7-H (Fig. 1c). L. brevis also had higher CFU count after co-incubation, but this was only significant for ST7-B. Interestingly, B. longum displayed lower CFU count when co-incubated with ST7-H. Average CFU count was moderately higher when co-incubated with ST7-B, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. An overall greater growth effect on CFU count was observed when ST7-B was co-incubated with gut commensal bacteria compared to ST7-H.
Blastocystis positively affects E. coli and negatively affects B. longum in a three-way co-culture setup
E. coli and Blastocystis caused oxidative stress to B. longum
As oxidative stress is a known contributor to dysbiosis , we explored whether Blastocystis and E. coli was impacting the viability of B. longum via such a mechanism. After incubation with Blastocystis and E. coli, the oxidoreductase gene expression of B. longum was analyzed. Results showed that two of the oxidoreductase genes, ferredoxin and ferridoxin, were upregulated when Blastocystis and E. coli were present (Fig. 2b). This suggests that the bacterium is undergoing oxidative stress in the presence of the organisms mentioned. Flow cytometry analysis of ROS content demonstrated that Blastocystis, E. coli, or both caused more B. longum cells to convert DCFDA stain indicating the presence of cellular ROS (Fig. 2c). Interestingly, the presence of Blastocystis alone caused significantly more production of ROS in B. longum than in combination with E. coli (Fig. 2d).
B. longum protects intestinal epithelial barrier against Blastocystis-induced damage
Blastocystis-infected mice had lower Bifidobacterium sp. and Lactobacillus sp. but higher E. coli abundance in the fecal samples
Histopathology examination revealed tissue damage in the colon of Blastocystis-infected mice
Although previous studies have reported associations between Blastocystis and gastrointestinal disorders, the protist’s pathogenic potential and clinical significance still remains to be established . To address the issue of Blastocystis’ pathogenesis, it could be useful to determine whether Blastocystis colonization is associated with gut dysbiosis, which is known to affect intestinal health . Various epidemiological studies have been executed in the past to investigate the associations between Blastocystis and dysbiosis, with conflicting results obtained [21–25, 39, 40]. One important limiting factor of some of these previous studies was that the subtype of Blastocystis, which has variations in terms of pathogenic potential, was not controlled for or identified [41, 42]. This study was therefore conducted with the aim of using a specific subtype (ST7) to study Blastocystis-gut bacteria interactions and to determine whether Blastocystis infection could disrupt the gut microbiota in vitro and in vivo.
Two Blastocystis ST7 isolates, ST7-B and ST7-H, were used in this study since previous reports indicate their pathogenic potential. In vitro assays on ST7 revealed that the isolate caused disruptions in the gut epithelial barrier by disrupting tight junction proteins such as occludin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), and also have greater adhesiveness than ST4 isolates to intestinal epithelial cells [29, 43]. Furthermore, ST7 was shown to have significantly greater cysteine protease activity compared to ST4 . Blastocystis ST7 have been shown to be more resistant to anti-parasitic drugs [28, 44] and against the host innate immune response  compared to ST1 and ST4 isolates. E. coli, E. faecalis, B. longum, L. brevis, B. fragilis, and B. subtilis were chosen for the co-incubation assay as representative species of the gut microbiota [46–49]. Among these, L. brevis and B. longum are well-known probiotic species which contribute protective benefits for the gut [49, 50]. More importantly, they have been found to improve intestinal conditions through the mitigation of IBD and IBS . Although the other species (E. coli, E. faecalis, B. fragilis, B. subtilis) are not widely considered as probiotic, they are still important commensal gut bacteria, playing roles in carbohydrate metabolism, production of important metabolites, and the exclusion of potential pathogens . Changes in the viability of these bacterial species (represented by CFU count in the assay) in the presence of Blastocystis may lead to potential disruptions in the microbiota. This may have important implications in relation to IBD and IBS.
The in vitro co-incubation assay demonstrated that Blastocystis cell count was higher in the presence of gut bacteria (Fig. 1a). It is possible that the bacteria secretory products or dead cells in the suspension act as a nutrient source for Blastocystis, allowing it to survive better when incubated in PBS. It is still unclear how Blastocystis obtains nutrients, but the mechanisms involved can be speculated. Although Blastocystis does not have true mitochondria, it has been found to possess mitochondrion-derived double-membrane-bound organelles called mitochondrion-like organelles (MLOs) . These MLOs are likely hydrogenosomes, which are found in “amitochondriate protists,” which can play roles in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. Within the MLOs, two key enzymes involved in anaerobic energy metabolism have been identified, namely, pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFO) and [FeFe] hydrogenase . PFOs function in carbohydrate metabolism, catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and CO2 . [FeFe] hydrogenases function in hydrogen metabolism . These two enzymes may be activated in the presence of bacterial products, which may be utilized as nutrient sources for Blastocystis. In comparison, Blastocystis cells in the control may have been starved of nutrients when they are incubated in PBS. The co-incubation assay also demonstrated higher bacterial CFU count when gut commensal bacteria were co-incubated with Blastocystis (Fig. 1b, c). Higher bacterial CFU count may be a result of bacteria breaking down dead cells (from both Blastocystis and existing bacteria cells), in order to obtain a nutrient source in the PBS suspension. It was also observed that there were differential effects across bacterial species, with E. coli, E. faecalis, B. subtilis, and B. fragilis displaying more prominent positive effects compared to L. brevis and B. longum after co-incubation with Blastocystis. Blastocystis and gut commensal bacteria generally exhibit a mutualistic relationship when co-incubated in vitro, evidenced by higher parasite numbers and bacterial CFU counts after co-incubation. E. coli, E. faecalis, B. fragilis, and B. subtilis appeared to have more significant positive effects than L. brevis and B. longum. This observation suggests that these bacteria received less beneficial effects and may have a weaker mutualistic relationship with ST7-B and ST7-H in vitro. Overall, the co-incubation assays show that Blastocystis can interact with gut-commensal bacteria, which may lead to changes in the gut microbiota. Furthermore, there may be differential interactions depending on the species of bacteria present. Hence, this served as a basis for the subsequent in vivo assays.
A three-way setup involving Blastocystis, E. coli, and B. longum was used to further investigate if Blastocystis had a selective influence on specific groups of gut bacteria. Results showed that Blastocystis could boost the growth of E. coli while inhibiting B. longum (Fig. 2a). E. coli is a facultative anaerobe while B. longum is an obligately anaerobe. These interactions suggest oxidative stress as a factor in the experimental outcome . Indeed, gene expression analysis of B. longum showed that some of the bacterium’s oxidoreductase genes are upregulated, suggesting that it is undergoing oxidative stress in the presence of Blastocystis and E. coli (Fig. 2b). In addition, a greater percentage of B. longum cells exhibited cellular ROS content when these were incubated with Blastocystis and E. coli (Fig. 2c, d). Our results, however, do not exclude other mechanisms of Blastocystis- and E. coli-mediated killing of B. longum. Possible implications of redox-mediated killing of obligate anaerobes would be decreased diversity in gut bacteria ultimately leading to dysbiosis .
In this study, an acute infection of Blastocystis ST7-B and ST7-H on mice was performed to assess Blastocystis-induced changes in the gut microbiota using qPCR (Fig. 4). This study utilized a DSS colitis mouse model, which improves Blastocystis colonization rates, as previously demonstrated for ST7-B- and ST7-H-infected C57BL/6 mice treated with low concentrations of DSS . Total bacteria levels and the relative abundance of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and E. coli populations were quantified using qPCR after Blastocystis infection. The reduction was observed in Bifidobacterium in mice infected by ST7-B and ST7-H. There was also lower abundance observed in Lactobacillus in ST7-H-infected mice. Interestingly, there was a higher abundance of E. coli in ST7-B-infected mice. These results are in concordance with what has been obtained using in vitro assays; Bifidobacterium was reduced, and E. coli’s abundance increased. In the case of Lactobacillus, its reduction was only observed in vivo. It is possible that host factors, which are not present in the in vitro assays, come into play in the observed reduction of Lactobacillus. Histological examination of mouse tissues (Fig. 5) corroborated with our previous study . The pathology scoring also identified ST7-H as more able to cause tissue damage than ST7-B. However, in this study, ST7-B appeared to be a better driver of dysbiosis than ST7-H. These observations point to differences between the isolates’ mechanism of pathogenesis, with ST7-H causing more direct damage to host cells and ST7-B causing harm through dysbiosis.
Together with Bifidobacterium spp. discussed above, Lactobacillus is another group of probiotic bacteria in the gut. Like Bifidobacterium, members of this genus also have similar anti-inflammatory properties . An in vitro study showed that L. casei could reduce T cell response by dendritic cells in healthy and ulcerative colitis patients, thus decreasing the inflammation. This is achieved through increased production of IL-4 and decreased secretion in IL-22 and IFN-γ [63, 64]. Lactobacillus has also been found to significantly increase IgA levels . Several in vivo studies using the DSS colitis mouse model showed that administration of both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium improved clinical symptoms of colitis and enhanced mucus production [66, 67]. Hence, a reduction in both gut bacteria would remove an element of protection from the gut epithelium, aiding the pathogenesis of Blastocystis. This could explain the intestinal tissue damage seen in the histology results of the current study. Epidemiological studies have also shown that reductions in these two bacteria could increase the susceptibility to gastrointestinal disorders. UC and CD patients were found to possess lower levels of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations, respectively [68, 69]. Similarly, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium levels are lower in IBS patients than that in healthy controls [70, 71]. Hence, the presence of Blastocystis ST7 could cause disease not only just directly but also through reduction of beneficial bacteria.
Various epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the links between Blastocystis and dysbiosis. Previous surveys have observed certain characteristics in the microbiota of Blastocystis-positive subjects, leading to the association of Blastocystis with a healthy human gut [21–24, 27]. A study found that Blastocystis-positive individuals free from IBD had higher fecal bacterial diversity, higher abundance of Clostridia, and lower abundance of Enterobacteriaceae . A recent study done across 12 metagenomic datasets found a strong association between Blastocystis and the enrichment of Firmicutes and Clostridiales, as well as the reduction in Bacteroides . Additionally, another group showed that Blastocystis is linked to a healthy gut, based on the high F. prausnitzii–E. coli ratio in Blastocystis-positive subjects . These and other studies formed the basis for asserting that Blastocystis is a member of the normal, healthy gut microbiota [72, 73]. It is important to note that two of the mentioned studies did not identify the subtype of Blastocystis present in its subjects [22, 23]. For the study which did identify the subtypes, a whole array was found in the subjects, including ST1 and ST3 which are associated with asymptomatic infections . The subjects from these studies could be predominantly colonized with subtypes associated with lower pathogenic potential and may be associated with healthy gut microbiota. However, this present study used a specific subtype, ST7, which exhibits high pathogenic potential. Therefore, the conflicting results may be due to the differential effects of various subtypes on the host and gut microbiota. It is therefore important for future studies to control or stratify for Blastocystis subtypes to avoid self-limiting results. The results of this study are in line with one epidemiological study, which concluded that Blastocystis is linked to dysbiosis . In that study, Blastocystis-positive patients with IBS-C had a significant decrease in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus populations. It was also noted that the subtype of Blastocystis involved in the study by Nourisson et al. was predominantly ST4. Compared to other STs except ST7, ST4 has a moderate pathogenic potential , and this could be the reason that Blastocystis was associated with dysbiosis, unlike the other studies. Overall, the findings from Nourisson et al. corroborate with the results of this study, both suggesting that virulent subtypes of Blastocystis are more likely to be associated with dysbiosis, and its pathological outcomes, including IBD and IBS.
Overall, this study investigated the interactions of pathogenic isolates of Blastocystis ST7 with known members of the gut microbiota. To our knowledge, this is the first time wherein in vitro setups complemented by an in vivo system were utilized to investigate the interactions of Blastocystis with the gut microbiota. In addition, this study also focused on a specific ST of Blastocystis. While most reports on Blastocystis label it as a commensal and a member of healthy gut microbiota, the findings in this study indicate that different ST of Blastocystis, represented by two pathogenic isolates, may modulate gut microbiota differently from more common STs (e.g., ST1–3). Future work should include other Blastocystis STs with lesser pathogenic potential as well as involving more representatives of gut bacteria. This should provide a clearer picture on where Blastocystis and its STs really stand on gut health and disease.
The authors are grateful for a generous grant from the Ministry of Education (R-571-000-037-114), without which this study would not have been possible. CWP acknowledges support from the NUS Medicine Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. The authors also thank Dr. Eileen Koh for critical reading and comments on the manuscript.
This study was generously funded by a Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier-1 grant (R-571-000-037-114). The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
JAY carried out the in vitro experiments, prepared the figures, performed statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. PWC and LYR carried out the animal infection and histopathology studies. KSWT conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Human Blastocystis isolates were acquired from patients at the Singapore General Hospital in the early 1990s, before the Institutional Review Board was established at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The samples were anonymized and do not contain any patient identifiers. The animal experiments were performed according to the Singapore National Advisory Committee for Laboratory Animal Research guidelines. The protocol (R13–5890) was approved by the NUS Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Tan KSW. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:639–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark CG, van der Giezen M, Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR. Chapter One-recent developments in blastocystis research. In: Rollinson D, editor. Adv Parasitol: England: Academic Press; 2013. p. 1–32.Google Scholar
- Arisue N, Hashimoto T, Yoshikawa H, Yoshi N, Nakamura G, Nakamura F, et al. Phylogenetic position of blastocystis hominis and of stramenopiles inferred from multiple molecular sequence data. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2002;49:42–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andersen LO, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis in health and disease: are we moving from a clinical to a public health perspective? J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:524–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wawrzyniak I, Poirier P, Viscogliosi E, Dionigia M, Texier C, Delbac F, et al. Blastocystis, an unrecognized parasite: an overview of pathogenesis and diagnosis. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2013;1:167–78.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sheehan DJ, Raucher BG, McKitrick JC. Association of blastocystis hominis with signs and symptoms of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:548–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Doyle PW, Helgason MM, Mathias RG, Proctor EM. Epidemiology and pathogenicity of Blastocystis hominis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:116–21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Qadri SM, al-Okaili GA, al-Dayel F. Clinical significance of Blastocystis hominis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2407–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Miller RA, Minshew BH. Blastocystis hominis: an organism in search of a disease. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10:930–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Udkow MP, Markell EK. Blastocystis hominis: prevalence in asymptomatic versus symptomatic hosts. J Infect Dis. 1993;168:242–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poirier P, Wawrzyniak I, Vivarès CP, Delbac F, Alaoui HE. New insights into Blastocystis spp.: a potential link with irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002545.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dogruman-Al F, Kustimur S, Yoshikawa H, Tuncer C, Simsek Z, Tanyuksel M, et al. Blastocystis subtypes in irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease in Ankara, Turkey. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:724–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yakoob J, Jafri W, Jafri N, Khan R, Islam M, Beg MA, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome: in search of an etiology: role of Blastocystis hominis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:383–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Giacometti A, Cirioni O, Fiorentini A, Fortuna M, Scalise G. Irritable bowel syndrome in patients with Blastocystis hominis infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:436–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagler J, Brown M, Soave R. Blastocystis hominis in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993;16:109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Principi N, Cozzali R, Farinelli E, Brusaferro A, Esposito S. Gut dysbiosis and irritable bowel syndrome: the potential role of probiotics. J Inf Secur. 2018;76:111–20.Google Scholar
- Rodiño-Janeiro BK, Vicario M, Alonso-Cotoner C, Pascua-García R, Santos J. A review of microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome: future in therapies. Adv Ther. 2018;35:289–310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Distrutti E, Monaldi L, Ricci P, Fiorucci S. Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: new therapeutic strategies. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:2219–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamboli CP, Neut C, Desreumaux P, Colombel JF. Dysbiosis as a prerequisite for IBD. Gut. 2004;53:1057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamboli CP, Neut C, Desreumaux P, Colombel JF. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2004;53:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beghini F, Pasolli E, Truong TD, Putignani L, Cacciò SM, Segata N. Large-scale comparative metagenomics of Blastocystis, a common member of the human gut microbiome. ISME J. 2017;11:2848–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Audebert C, Even G, Cian A, The Blastocystis Investigation Group, Safadi DE, Certad G, et al. Colonization with the enteric protozoa Blastocystis is associated with increased diversity of human gut bacterial microbiota. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iebba V, Santangelo F, Totino V, Pantanella F, Monsia A, Cristanziano VD, et al. Gut microbiota related to giardia duodenalis, Entamoeba spp. and Blastocystis hominis infections in humans from Côte d’Ivoire. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10:1035–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andersen LO, Bonde I, Nielsen HB, Stensvold CR. A retrospective metagenomics approach to studying Blastocystis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015;91:1–9.Google Scholar
- Nourrisson C, Scanzi J, Pereira B, NkoudMongo C, Wawrzyniak I, Cian A, et al. Blastocystis is associated with decrease of fecal microbiota protective bacteria: comparative analysis between patients with irritable bowel syndrome and control subjects. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stensvold CR, Suresh GK, Tan KSW, Thompson RCA, Traub RJ, Viscogliosi E, et al. Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes—a consensus. Trends Parasitol. 2007;23:93–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tito RY, Chaffron S, Caenepeel C, Lima-Mendez G, Wang J, Vieira-Silva S, et al. Population-level analysis of Blastocystis subtype prevalence and variation in the human gut microbiota. Gut. 2018;0:1–10.Google Scholar
- Mirza H, Teo JDW, Upcroft J, Tan KSW. A rapid, high-throughput viability assay for Blastocystis spp. reveals metronidazole resistance and extensive subtype-dependent variations in drug susceptibilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:637–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu Z, Mirza H, Tan KSW. Intra-subtype variation in Enteroadhesion accounts for differences in epithelial barrier disruption and is associated with metronidazole resistance in Blastocystis Subtype-7. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2885.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ajjampur SSR, Png CW, Chia WN, Zhang Y, Tan KSW. Ex Vivo and In Vivo Mice Models to Study Blastocystis spp. Adhesion, Colonization and Pathology: Closer to Proving Koch’s Postulates. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160458.Google Scholar
- Stensvold CR, Lewis HC, Hammerum AM, Porsbo LJ, Nielsen SS, Olsen KEP, et al. Blastocystis: unravelling potential risk factors and clinical significance of a common but neglected parasite. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137:1655–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ho LC, Singh M, Suresh G, Ng GC, Yap EH. Axenic culture of Blastocystis hominis in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium. Parasitol Res. 1993;79:614–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herigstad B, Hamilton M, Heersink J. How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2001;44:121–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oberg TS, Ward RE, Steele JL, Broadbent JR. Transcriptome analysis of Bifidobacterium longum strains that show a differential response to hydrogen peroxide stress. J Biotechnol. 2015;212:58–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steed H, Macfarlane GT, Blackett KL, Macfarlane S, Miller MH, Bahrami B, et al. Bacterial translocation in cirrhosis is not caused by an abnormal small bowel gut microbiota. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011;63:346–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A. Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:1166–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weiss GA, Hennet T. Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74:2959–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manichanh C, Borruel N, Casellas F, Guarner F. The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9:599–608.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien Andersen L, Karim AB, Roager HM, Vigsnæs LK, Krogfelt KA, Licht TR, et al. Associations between common intestinal parasites and bacteria in humans as revealed by qPCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:1427–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nagel R, Traub RJ, Allcock RJN, Kwan MMS, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H. Comparison of faecal microbiota in Blastocystis-positive and Blastocystis-negative irritable bowel syndrome patients. Microbiome. 2016;4:47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hussein EM, Hussein AM, Eida MM, Atwa MM. Pathophysiological variability of different genotypes of human Blastocystis hominis Egyptian isolates in experimentally infected rats. Parasitol Res. 2008;102:853–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan KSW, Mirza H, Teo JDW, Wu B, MacAry PA. Current views on the clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010;12:28–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu Z, Mirza H, Teo JDW, Tan KSW. Strain-dependent induction of human enterocyte apoptosis by blastocystis disrupts epithelial barrier and ZO-1 organization in a caspase 3- and 9-dependent manner. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:209163.Google Scholar
- Yason JA, Koh KARP, Tan KSW. Viability Screen of LOPAC 1280 Reveals Phosphorylation Inhibitor Auranofin as a Potent Inhibitor of Blastocystis Subtype 1, 4, and 7 Isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e00208–18.Google Scholar
- Yason JA, Ajjampur SSR, Tan KSW. Blastocystis isolate B exhibits multiple modes of resistance against antimicrobial peptide LL-37. Infect Immun. 2016;84:2220–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holt JF, Kiedrowski MR, Frank KL, Du J, Guan C, Broderick NA, et al. Enterococcus faecalis 6-Phosphogluconolactonase is required for both commensal and pathogenic interactions with Manduca sexta. Infect Immun. 2015;83:396–404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong HA, Khaneja R, Tam NMK, Cazzato A, Tan S, Urdaci M, et al. Bacillus subtilis isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Res Microbiol. 2009;160:134–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leimbach A, Hacker J, Dobrindt UE. Coli as an all-rounder: the thin line between commensalism and pathogenicity. In: Dobrindt U, Hacker JH, Svanborg C, editors. Pathog commensalism. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 3–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schell MA, Karmirantzou M, Snel B, Vilanova D, Berger B, Pessi G, et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:14422–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walter J. Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl Env Microbiol. 2008;74:4985–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sugahara H, Odamaki T, Fukuda S, Kato T, Xiao J, Abe F, et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum alters gut luminal metabolism through modification of the gut microbial community. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13548.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. Collaborative JPEN-clinical nutrition scientific publications role of intestinal bacteria in nutrient metabolism. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1997;21:357–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Embley TM, Martin W. Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges. Nature. 2006;440:623–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stechmann A, Hamblin K, Pérez-Brocal V, Gaston D, Richmond GS, van der Giezen M, et al. Organelles in Blastocystis that blur the distinction between mitochondria and hydrogenosomes. Curr Biol. 2008;18:580–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Furdui C, Ragsdale SW. The role of pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase in pyruvate synthesis during autotrophic growth by the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28494–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mulder DW, Shepard EM, Meuser JE, Joshi N, King PW, Posewitz MC, et al. Insights into [FeFe]-hydrogenase structure, mechanism, and maturation. Structure. 2011;19:1038–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rivera-Chávez F, Lopez CA, Bäumler AJ. Oxygen as a driver of gut dysbiosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;105:93–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ling X, Linglong P, Weixia D, Hong W. Protective effects of Bifidobacterium on intestinal barrier function in LPS-induced enterocyte barrier injury of Caco-2 monolayers and in a rat NEC model. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161635.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mirza H, Wu Z, Teo JDW, Tan KSW. Statin pleiotropy prevents rho kinase-mediated intestinal epithelial barrier compromise induced by Blastocystis cysteine proteases. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14:1474–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim MX, Png CW, Tay CYB, Teo JDW, Jiao H, Lehming N, et al. Differential Regulation of Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression by Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in Macrophages in Response to Intestinal Parasite Infection. Appleton JA, editor. Infect Immun. 2014;82:4789.Google Scholar
- Long H, Handschack A, König W, Ambrosch A. Blastocystis hominis modulates immune responses and cytokine release in colonic epithelial cells. Parasitol Res. 2001;87:1029–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plaza-Díaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda F, Vilchez-Padial L, Gil A, Plaza-Díaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ, et al. Evidence of the anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics and synbiotics in intestinal chronic diseases. Nutrients. 2017;9:555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mann ER, You J, Horneffer-van der Sluis V, Bernardo D, Omar Al-Hassi H, Landy J, et al. Dysregulated circulating dendritic cell function in ulcerative colitis is partially restored by probiotic strain Lactobacillus casei Shirota. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:573576.Google Scholar
- Mann ER, Bernardo D, Ng SC, Rigby RJ, Al-Hassi HO, Landy J, et al. Human gut dendritic cells drive aberrant gut-specific T-cell responses in ulcerative colitis, characterized by increased IL-4 production and loss of IL-22 and IFNγ. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20:2299–307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carasi P, Racedo SM, Jacquot C, Romanin DE, Serradell MA, Urdaci MC. Impact of kefir derived Lactobacillus kefiri on the mucosal immune response and gut microbiota. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:361604.Google Scholar
- Abdelouhab K, Rafa H, Toumi R, Bouaziz S, Medjeber O, Touil-Boukoffa C. Mucosal intestinal alteration in experimental colitis correlates with nitric oxide production by peritoneal macrophages: effect of probiotics and prebiotics. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2012;34:590–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toumi R, Abdelouhab K, Rafa H, Soufli I, Raissi-Kerboua D, Djeraba Z, et al. Beneficial role of the probiotic mixture Ultrabiotique on maintaining the integrity of intestinal mucosal barrier in DSS-induced experimental colitis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2013;35:403–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jonkers D, Stockbrügger R. Probiotics and inflammatory bowel disease. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:167–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ott SJ, Plamondon S, Hart A, Begun A, Rehman A, Kamm MA, et al. Dynamics of the mucosa-associated flora in ulcerative colitis patients during remission and clinical relapse. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3510–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balsari A, Ceccarelli A, Dubini F, Fesce E, Poli G. The fecal microbial population in the irritable bowel syndrome. Microbiologica. 1982;5:185–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee BJ, Bak Y-T. Irritable bowel syndrome, gut microbiota and probiotics. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:252–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andersen LO, Vedel Nielsen H, Stensvold CR. Waiting for the human intestinal Eukaryotome. ISME J. 2013;7:1253–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stensvold CR, van der Giezen M. Associations between gut microbiota and common luminal intestinal parasites. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:369–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar