The microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage from young children with chronic lung disease includes taxa present in both the oropharynx and nasopharynx
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 25 November 2015
Accepted: 24 June 2016
Published: 7 July 2016
Invasive methods requiring general anaesthesia are needed to sample the lung microbiota in young children who do not expectorate. This poses substantial challenges to longitudinal study of paediatric airway microbiota. Non-invasive upper airway sampling is an alternative method for monitoring airway microbiota; however, there are limited data describing the relationship of such results with lung microbiota in young children. In this study, we compared the upper and lower airway microbiota in young children to determine whether non-invasive upper airway sampling procedures provide a reliable measure of either lung microbiota or clinically defined differences.
The microbiota in oropharyngeal (OP) swabs, nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from 78 children (median age 2.2 years) with and without lung disease were characterised using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) detected significant differences between the microbiota in BAL and those in both OP swabs (p = 0.0001, Pseudo-F = 12.2, df = 1) and NP swabs (p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F = 21.9, df = 1) with the NP and BAL microbiota more different than the OP and BAL, as indicated by a higher Pseudo-F value. The microbiota in combined OP and NP data (upper airways) provided a more comprehensive representation of BAL microbiota, but significant differences between the upper airway and BAL microbiota remained, albeit with a considerably smaller Pseudo-F (PERMANOVA p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F = 4.9, df = 1). Despite this overall difference, paired BAL and upper airway (OP and NP) microbiota were >50 % similar among 69 % of children. Furthermore, canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP analysis) detected significant differences between the microbiota from clinically defined groups when analysing either BAL (eigenvalues >0.8; misclassification rate 26.5 %) or the combined OP and NP data (eigenvalues >0.8; misclassification rate 12.2 %).
Upper airway sampling provided an imperfect, but reliable, representation of the BAL microbiota for most children in this study. We recommend inclusion of both OP and NP specimens when non-invasive upper airway sampling is needed to assess airway microbiota in young children who do not expectorate. The results of the CAP analysis suggest lower and upper airway microbiota profiles may differentiate children with chronic suppurative lung disease from those with persistent bacterial bronchitis; however, further research is needed to confirm this observation.
In recent years, molecular methods have clearly demonstrated that the lungs are not sterile at homeostasis. Adult studies have shown that microaspiration of the upper respiratory secretions continually inoculates the lungs with oral microbiota ; host defences must then efficiently clear or contain the microbes to prevent infection . Changes in the lower airway microbiota during the onset and progression of acute and chronic lung diseases are poorly understood.
In adults and older children, spontaneous and induced sputum are used non-invasively to sample the lower airways for assessment of the lung microbiota. Studies in very young children who do not expectorate are more challenging as invasive procedures, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) collected via bronchoscopy, are required to sample the lower airway microbiota . The invasive nature of BAL, including a requirement for general anaesthesia, renders it neither suitable nor ethically feasible for longitudinal studies . Reflecting this limitation, studies of lung microbiota in very young children have generally been cross-sectional .
Upper airway sampling has long been considered an alternative method for assessing airway microbiology in young children  but remains controversial as significant differences between the upper and lower airway microbiota have been detected in several studies [7–11]. In recent years, studies comparing upper and lower airway specimens have reported that the lower airway microbiota is more similar to that of the oropharynx than that in the nose or nasopharynx [1, 12, 13]; however, these studies have been limited to adults [1, 12] and older children (>7 years) . It is unclear if these data can be extrapolated to other paediatric populations, especially as the nasopharynx is an important reservoir of lower respiratory pathogens in young children [14, 15]. Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of the nasopharyngeal (NP) microbiota, particularly pathogenic species, to lung disease in infants and young children [16–21]. Furthermore, culture-based studies have demonstrated that oropharyngeal (OP) swabs do not reliably predict the presence of respiratory pathogens in the lower airways of children <2 years of age .
In this study, we have directly compared OP, NP and BAL microbiota in young children. Our study included 78 children who had protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB), chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD) or no lung disease (controls). We aimed to determine (i) the similarity of the microbiota in the OP and NP compared to BAL and (ii) whether non-invasive sampling of the upper airways provided a reliable measure of either the lung microbiota or differences between clinically defined groups. We hypothesised that the BAL microbiota in young children would show similarity to both the OP and NP microbiota.
Number of children
40 (36 with BE)
5 (all with BE)
35 (31 with BE)
Median age in years (95 % CI)
Number of Indigenous children (%)
Received antibiotics within 2 weeks of bronchoscopy (%)
Azithromycin + sulphamethoxazole trimethoprim
Ceftriaxone, amoxicillin clavulanate, flucloxicillin
Unsure if received antibiotics
DNA extracts from a high proportion of clinical specimens reflected low bacterial load
The data were then reviewed to determine if specimens with low bacterial loads were provided by the same or by different children. Overall, low bacterial load was detected in at least one specimen from 49/78 (63 %) children. Approximately half of these children (49 %) had recently received antibiotics, a proportion similar to the antibiotic exposure rate for all subjects (43 %), suggesting that low bacterial load was unrelated to recent antibiotic exposure. DNA extracts from all of the specimens from one control child had low bacterial load; this child had received amoxicillin clavulanate. A further 14 children had low bacterial loads detected for the NP swab, Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 specimens (4 control children, 1 child with PBB and 9 with CSLD); six of these children had recently received antibiotics. Low bacterial load was detected in the NP swabs from 17 children from whom the paired Lavage-1 specimens contained >103 GE/μL extracted DNA. No children had low bacterial load in the OP swab when the load in paired Lavage-1 specimen was >103 GE/μL extracted DNA. Bacterial load in any specimen type was unrelated to the age of the children (all Spearman rank correlation p > 0.29).
16S rRNA gene sequencing was successful for most specimens, including those with low bacterial load
Regardless of the bacterial load, all of the 302 specimens were processed for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. One NP swab, two Lavage-1 specimens and one Lavage-2 specimen failed to generate any 16S rRNA gene sequencing data; each of these specimens also failed to amplify in the bacterial load qPCR.
As a high proportion of the specimens had low bacterial load, the sequence data were reviewed for the presence of probable contaminant taxa [24, 26], as described in Additional file 1. Overall, 237 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) consistent with 54 genera reported previously as contaminants in DNA extraction reagents [24, 26] were identified and removed prior to downstream analyses (Additional file 1: Table S1). The relative abundance of these OTUs ranged from 0 to 89 % (median 0.2 %) and showed a significant inverse correlation with the bacterial load in the extracted DNA (Spearman rho = −0.85; p < 0.0001). All specimens with probable contaminant genera detected at relative abundance >20 % had low bacterial load. There was no significant difference in the relative abundance of the probable contaminant OTUs in NP swabs, Lavage-1 or Lavage-2 specimens (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The relative abundance of the probable contaminant OTUs did not exceed 20 % in any OP swab, reflecting the high proportion of OP swabs (77/78) that had bacterial load >103 GE/μL extracted DNA (Fig. 2).
After exclusion of probable contaminant OTUs, there were 90–17,444 sequencing reads/specimen (median 4639). The data were subsampled to 1025 reads/specimen to achieve a balance between sufficient sampling depth and exclusion of low-quality specimens. Good’s coverage at this depth was >95 % for the 277 specimens with >1025 reads. This included 77/94 (82 %) specimens that had low bacterial load, 27 of which had failed to amplify above the qPCR’s limit of detection. After removal of the contaminant OTUs, low bacterial load specimens did not cluster separately to specimens with >103 GE/μL extracted DNA in principal coordinate analysis (PCoA; Additional file 1: Figure S2).
Twenty-five specimens had <1025 reads and were excluded from further analysis (Fig. 1). This left 277 specimens from 78 children. For 73 children, paired sequence data were available from the upper and/or lower airway specimens. Of these, 65/73 children had sequence data for the OP swab, NP swab and Lavage-1 (8 controls, 19 with PBB and 38 with CSLD); 57/78 had data for Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 (6 controls, 19 PBB and 32 with CSLD); and 49 had data for all four specimen types (5 controls, 13 with PBB and 31 with CSLD). Five children were excluded from analyses of paired data because their NP swab and one or both lavage specimens returned <1025 sequence reads (Fig. 1).
Alpha diversity in the OP, NP and lower airways
OTUs detected at >50 % relative abundance in each specimen type
SILVA reference taxonomy
BLASTn (% identity)
Maximum relative abundance (%)
Moraxella catarrhalis (98 %)
Haemophilus influenzae (99 %)
Staphylococcus aureus (100 %)
Corynebacterium propinquum (100 %)
Mitis Group Streptococci (99 %)
Moraxella nonliquefaciens (99 %)
Moraxella lincolnii (98 %)
Mycoplasma amphoriforme (99 %)
Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (90 %)
Porphyromonas sp. (99 %)
Moraxella catarrhalis (98 %)
Staphylococcus aureus (100 %)
Haemophilus influenzae (99 %)
Moraxella nonliquefaciens (99 %)
Neisseria lactamica (99 %)
Prevotella sp. (98 %)
Haemophilus influenzae (99 %)
Moraxella catarrhalis (98 %)
Mitis Group Streptococci (99 %)
Prevotella sp. (98 %)
Diversity in any specimen type was not significantly associated with antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks of bronchoscopy and was unrelated to bacterial load in OP swab, NP swab and Lavage-2 specimens (all Mann-Whitney U test p > 0.05). Diversity was significantly higher in Lavage-1 specimens with low bacterial load (median 0.89; 95 % CI 0.83–0.91) compared to those with higher loads (median 0.79, 95 % CI 0.71–0.83; Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.0005); however, this finding is unlikely to indicate a systemic bias as it was not reproduced in analysis of other specimen types. Diversity in any specimen type was unrelated to the age of the children (all Spearman correlation p > 0.08).
Diversity in NP swabs increased with disease severity (Fig. 3d); however, only the comparison of the control and CSLD children showed significant differences after correction for multiple measures (Dunn’s post hoc test, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the microbiota diversity in the OP, Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 specimens from different diagnostic groups (Additional file 1: Figure S3). There was no significant correlation between the diversity in lavage specimens and that in corresponding OP or NP swabs (all Spearman rank correlation p > 0.07), reflecting differences in the relative abundance of dominant OTUs in the upper and lower airway data.
Comparison of OP and NP microbiota
Similarity of the upper and lower airway microbiota
Number of children
Bray-Curtis similarity median (95 % CI)
Variation between specimen types
Variation between children
NP and OP
Lavage-1 and Lavage-2
NP and Lavage-1
OP and Lavage-1
Upper and Lavage-1
Upper and lower
Comparison of Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 microbiota
There was no significant difference between the bacterial loads in paired Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 specimens (Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.39). Likewise, there was no difference between the microbiota in Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 (PERMANOVA p = 0.72, Pseudo-F = 0.8, df 1; Table 3). Median Bray-Curtis similarity between paired lavage specimens was 70.9 % (95 % CI 63.2–74.0), a level comparable to that of the sequencing reproducibility control (71.1 %; this control is described further in the methods and Additional file 1). In a PCoA, the lavage specimens were dispersed across PCO1 between the OP and NP data points (Fig. 4a), suggesting similarity of the lavage microbiota to both the OP and NP microbiota in some children. The similarity percentages routine (SIMPER) in PRIMER identified three OTUs consistent with Mitis Group Streptococci (including Streptococcus pneumoniae), Haemophilus influenzae and Prevotella as individually accounting for most variation between lavage specimens (16, 11 and 7 %, respectively). The relative abundance of these OTUs in lavage specimens was significantly correlated with that in either the OP (Prevotella OTU, Spearman rho = 0.68; p < 0.0001), the NP (Mitis Group Streptococcus Spearman rho = 0.39; p = 0.001) or both upper airway specimens (H. influenzae, Spearman rho = 0.5, p < 0.0001), suggesting similarity of lavage microbiota to those in both the OP and NP.
Lavage microbiota were distinct from OP and NP microbiota
PERMANOVA detected significant differences between the microbiota in both the OP (p = 0.0001, Pseudo-F 12.2, df 1) and the NP (p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F 21.9; df 1) when compared to Lavage-1; however, this difference was more pronounced between NP and Lavage-1 specimens, as indicated by a higher Pseudo-F value (Table 3). Bray-Curtis similarity between paired OP and Lavage-1 specimens was >50 % for 37/65 (57.8 %) children, compared with only 5/65 (7.7 %) children when NP and Lavage-1 microbiota were compared. Two children had >50 % Bray-Curtis similarity between the Lavage-1 microbiota and that of the paired OP and NP swabs, whereas for 25/65 (38 %) children, the Lavage-1 microbiota were <50 % similar to that in either of the paired OP or NP swabs.
Combining OP and NP data increased overall similarity with the lavage microbiota, but significant differences remained
We next combined the OP and NP data to determine whether an upper airway sampling strategy that included both sites concurrently would provide a more comprehensive representation of Lavage-1 microbiota. The combined OP and NP data were significantly different to Lavage-1 (PERMANOVA p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F 6.8, df 1); however, the Pseudo-F statistic was 1.8 and 3.2 times lower than comparisons of Lavage-1 with the OP or NP microbiota, respectively (all df 1; Table 3). Furthermore, the PERMANOVA components of variation showed that differences in the microbiota among specimen types contributed 25.3, 17.9 and 13.0 % of variation between NP, OP and combined upper airway data, respectively, when compared to Lavage-1. These findings indicate that the combined OP and NP data provided a better representation of Lavage-1 microbiota than analysis of either upper airway site alone; however, significant differences remained.
We then tested whether combined Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 data would show higher similarity to the upper airway microbiota than analysis of Lavage-1 alone. This analysis was performed for the subset of 49 children with paired Lavage-2 data. Inclusion of Lavage-2 data increased the richness detected from the lower airways by 2–27 OTUs (median 8, 95 % CI 6–12) for 27/49 children. Overall, Bray-Curtis similarity between the combined OP and NP data (upper airway microbiota) and the combined Lavage-1 and Lavage-2 data (lower airway microbiota) was >50 % for 34/49 (69.4 %) children. A PERMANOVA test showed higher similarity between the upper and lower airway data after inclusion of Lavage-2 (Pseudo-F 4.9, df 1; Table 3); however, significant differences remained (PERMANOVA p = 0.0001) with 12.1 % of the total variation explained by variation among the upper and lower airway microbiota. Variation in the microbiota due to differences between the children explained 45.1 % of the total variance (p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F 3.2, df 48), while 42.8 % of the data variability remained unexplained.
Microbiota in lower and upper airways discriminated clinically defined groups
As paired upper and lower airway data from 67.3 % children clustered together despite the overall significant difference in the microbiota, we next tested whether discrimination of disease groups based on analysis of lower airway microbiota would have been detected if only the upper airway data were analysed. This was done by testing for differences in the lower airway microbiota related to each disease group and then determining if any observed discrimination was reproduced in the analysis of the upper airway microbiota.
This group-specific discrimination was reproduced in the analysis of the upper airway microbiota (PERMANOVA p = 0.0001; Pseudo-F 3.59, df 2). Dispersion of the upper airway data in PCoA was different to that of the lower airways (Figs. 6a, c), reflecting underlying differences in the diversity between the two anatomic sites. As with the lower airway data, there was some overlap between data points for each diagnostic group in the PCoA that was resolved by CAP analysis (eigenvalues CAP1 0.89, CAP2 0.85; misclassification rate 12.2 %; trace statistic p = 0.0001) with distinct separation of the groups across the CAP axes (Fig. 6d). These data indicate that differences between each diagnostic group were detected regardless of whether the lower or upper airway microbiota data were analysed.
Results of SIMPER analysis comparing the microbiota in children with PBB and CSLD
BLASTn (% identity)
Lower airway data
Moraxella catarrhalis (98)
Haemophilus influenzae (99)
Prevotella sp. (98)
Mitis Group Streptococci (99)
Neisseria lactamica (99)
Neisseria sp. (99)
Haemophilus haemolyticus (99)
Porphyromonas sp. (99)
Prevotella melaninogenica (100)
Upper Airway Data
Moraxella catarrhalis (98)
Haemophilus influenzae (99)
Mitis Group Streptococci (99)
Prevotella sp. (98)
Corynebacterium propinquum (100)
Haemophilus haemolyticus (99)
Staphylococcus aureus (100)
Porphyromonas sp. (99)
Neisseria sp. (99)
Moraxella lincolnii (98)
Similar findings were observed in the analysis of the upper airway data, except that the CSLD and PBB groups were discriminated across the CAP1 axis (Fig. 7b). As with the lower airway data, discrimination of the groups was associated with OTUs consistent with Mitis Group Streptococci, H. influenzae, a Porphyromonas sp. and Moraxella lincolnii (discriminating the CSLD group), and M. catarrhalis, a Neisseria sp., 2 Prevotella sp., H. haemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus (discriminating the PBB group). The OTU consistent with C. propinquum contributed to separation across CAP2, but not CAP1 (Fig. 7b). Collectively, these data show that the observed discrimination of the CSLD and PBB groups was associated with similar OTUs in analysis of both the lower and upper airway data.
We have shown that the combined OP and NP microbiota provided a better representation of BAL microbiota for most children in our study (67.3 %) than the analysis of the microbiota in either the upper airway site alone; however, low similarity between the paired upper and lower airway microbiota was detected for 32.7 % of the children. Despite low similarity in some children, a CAP analysis showed that a non-invasive sampling strategy that combined OP and NP swabs discriminated clinically defined groups of children as well as the microbiota in invasive lavage specimens. This observation was supported by results of a SIMPER analysis that showed seven of the top 10 OTUs contributing to discrimination of the lower airway data from children with CSLD and PBB and also contributed to discrimination of clinical groups in analysis of the upper airway data. Collectively, these results suggest that combined NP and OP sampling provided an imperfect, but reliable, measure of airway microbiota for most children in this study. Based on these results, we recommend that both OP and NP specimens are included when measures of upper airway microbiota are used to study lower airway disease in young children who do not expectorate.
Our results showing combined OP and NP provided the best representation of BAL microbiota likely reflects the importance of microbes in the nasopharynx to the lower airway infection in young children. Studies of adults and older children have reported high similarity between the OP and the lower airway microbiota and concluded that the lung microbiota develops from microaspiration of oral flora [1, 13]. Seeding of the lower airways by NP microbiota during episodes of rhinorrhoea has been suggested , but there have been limited data to date to support this hypothesis. Episodes of rhinorrhoea associated with upper respiratory tract infection are common in young children [29, 30]. Furthermore, the nasopharynx is an important reservoir of respiratory pathogens in paediatric populations [14, 16, 31], with NP pathogen carriage associated with the increased risk of lower airway infection . Several studies have reported associations between NP microbiota and lower airway diseases including pneumonia , bronchiolitis  and asthma . A longitudinal study of NP aspirates from 234 children under 1 year of age identified the NP microbiota as a determinant for infection spreading to the lower airways . Culture-based studies have also shown high concordance between the presence of pathogenic species and strains in the nasopharynx and BAL of young children with bronchiectasis . While these findings support a role for the NP microbiota seeding the lower airways of young children, it is unclear if this only occurs during episodes of rhinorrhoea or is related to other mechanisms. Our data highlight the need for further research to understand mechanisms of seeding the lower airways by NP microbiota, particularly in paediatric populations.
The low similarity between the paired upper and lower airway data in 32.7 % of the children was unrelated to recent antibiotic treatment, low bacterial load or diagnostic group. Earlier studies also detected subsets of individuals with dissimilarity between the upper and lower airway specimens. Bassis et al.  compared oral wash and BAL microbiota in 28 healthy adults and found that although the microbiota in the different specimen types showed significant overlap, the microbiota in paired specimens from 57 % of the study cohort were dissimilar. Likewise, Zemanick et al.  reported overlap between the microbiota in OP swabs and sputum specimens from older children and young adults with cystic fibrosis, with significant divergence between oral and sputum microbiota in a subset of the cohort related to increased relative abundance of potentially pathogenic genera in sputum specimens. The reasons for the dissimilarity between the paired upper and lower airway specimens in our study are unclear but may indicate either a role for other upper airway bacterial reservoirs in seeding the lower airways (for example, the sinuses [4, 34, 35]) or lower airway environmental pressures that select for specific microbiota [1, 8].
Our results highlight the importance of considering the generalizability of airway microbiota data. Our observations are specific to a cohort of young children (median age 2.2 years) with PBB, CSLD or no lung disease. In contrast, findings from other studies have been specific to populations of healthy adults ; older children, adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis [8, 10, 13]; and patients with end-stage respiratory disease [9, 11]. At the extremes of this spectrum, studies of healthy adults have demonstrated correlation between the OP and the lower airway microbiota , whereas studies of end-stage respiratory disease have demonstrated divergence of the microbiota from the lung and OP specimens [9, 11]. Our finding that lavage microbiota showed similarity to both OP and NP microbiota may not be generalizable to other paediatric or adult populations or to children with end-stage respiratory disease; however, this limitation is common to all studies of respiratory microbiota in defined populations. Understanding the similarity and divergence of the microbiota across the airways in populations of different age and clinical presentation remains an important area for future research.
The clinical implications of our findings are unclear. The CAP analysis suggests lower and/or combined OP and NP microbiota profiles may differentiate CSLD and PBB. The OTUs discriminating the CSLD and PBB groups were consistent with the taxa previously reported in the NP of young Dutch children  and in the NP, OP and BAL of healthy adults . Biesbroek et al.  reported fewer respiratory infections in children with NP colonisation by Moraxella, Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum species compared to children colonised by Streptococcus and Haemophilus species. In our study, OTUs consistent with Mitis Group Streptococci and H. influenzae were associated with children with CSLD, whereas M. catarrhalis was associated with PBB. Bassis et al.  reported enrichment of Prevotella sp. in the lung, whereas in our study, Prevotella in the upper airway data was associated with the PBB group.
Our results must, however, be considered within the limitations of our study design (a cross-sectional analysis with imbalances between the clinically defined groups). Although the study design was suitable for assessing the similarity of the lower and upper airway microbiota, potential confounding factors limit clinical inference. For example, 83 % of the children with CSLD were Indigenous Australians compared with only 7 % of children with PBB and none of the controls. No studies have compared the upper or lower airway microbiota in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children; however, culture and PCR-based studies have reported significant differences in the multiplicity and density of potential respiratory pathogens colonising the nasopharynx of Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous Australian children [36, 37]. Furthermore, an earlier study comparing the microbiota in non-Indigenous Australian children with PBB and CSLD did not detect disease-associated microbiota and instead reported a core BAL microbiota common to both disease groups . Thus, it is unclear whether the discrimination observed in our study indicates disease-specific microbiota profiles or underlying population-level differences. Likewise, we cannot exclude potential confounding due to antibiotic treatment, as 65 % of the children with CSLD had recently received antibiotics compared with ~20 % of controls and children with PBB. Further investigation to confirm whether upper and/or lower airway microbiota profiles differentiate CSLD and PBB is warranted but was beyond the scope of the current study. Further study is also needed to understand whether airway microbiota in Indigenous Australian children is different to that of non-Indigenous children and whether such differences may relate to the disproportionately high rates of CSLD in Indigenous children .
Age-related factors may also confound analysis of disease-specific differences in airway microbiota. Longitudinal studies have reported age-related changes in NP microbiota , whereas we did not detect associations between age and bacterial load or diversity in any of the specimen types. Cross-sectional analysis of age-related changes in the airway microbiota of children with chronic lung diseases may also be confounded by differences in the age at disease-onset, duration of disease, and disease severity. Such data were not available for inclusion in our analysis.
Consistent with earlier reports [17, 39, 40], a high proportion (31 %) of DNA extracts in our study had bacterial loads below that recommended for 16S rRNA gene sequencing [24, 25]. A significant role for contaminant OTUs in sequence data from low bacterial load specimens was recently recognised . The method we used to exclude contaminant OTUs was reported previously for analysis of low bacterial load upper airway and middle ear specimens from otitis media patients . While this method proved useful, allowing successful characterisation of the microbiota in 77/94 specimens with low to very low bacterial load, it remains possible that further refinement of the current methods may improve detection and eradication of contaminant OTUs. Refinement of such algorithms was beyond the scope of the current study but should remain an area of active research.
Low bacterial load in our specimens is unlikely to reflect a sampling bias, as all specimens were collected using the same standardised protocol while children were under general anaesthesia. Furthermore, low bacterial load was consistently detected across the NP and lavage specimens from 15/78 children in our study, suggesting it may be a feature of the airways in specific children. The clinical significance of this observation is unclear; however, low bacterial load in airway specimens has been associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with respiratory infections [6, 41]. Alternative extraction methods may also increase bacterial DNA yield from low biomass specimens  and, thus, improve microbiomic characterisation of paediatric airway specimens . This may be especially important if NP swabs are included in upper airway sampling strategies.
Several technical limitations should also be considered when interpreting results from this study. All specimens were placed in skim milk tryptone glucose glycerol broth (STGGB )media prior to long-term storage at −80 °C. STGGB is a preservative media optimised for recovery of respiratory pathogens  and is widely used in NP carriage studies . While it is possible that storage in STGGB may have permitted overgrowth of some taxa, we believe this is unlikely as the specimens were kept on ice after collection and were stored at −80 °C within 2 h of collection. We also cannot exclude potential contamination from residual bacterial DNA in the bronchoscopes as instrument background controls were not collected.
We have shown that for most children in our study, an upper airway sampling strategy that combined OP and NP microbiota provided better representation of BAL microbiota than analysis of either upper airway site alone. Our data suggest that the lower and upper airway microbiota profiles may differentiate children with CSLD or PBB; however, further testing is needed to confirm this observation as our study was not optimally designed for clinical inference. We conclude that although upper airway sampling provided an imperfect representation of the lower airway microbiota, it could be used as a reliable measure of airway microbiota for most children in this study. Sampling strategies that include both OP and NP specimens are recommended when non-invasive upper airway sampling is needed to assess airway microbiota in young children who do not expectorate.
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin (HREC 07/63 and 09/02), and the Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane (HREC 2003/017 and 200800064). Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/carer of each child.
PBB was clinically defined based on the presence of a wet cough for >4 weeks, the absence of specific causal indicators for cough (e.g., failure to thrive, chest wall deformity) and resolution of cough within 2 weeks of commencing appropriate antibiotic therapy . CSLD was clinically defined based on the presence of a wet productive cough for >8 weeks, with a clinical profile of bronchiectasis without cHRCT findings (either because cHRCT was not undertaken or did not fulfil radiological criteria) . Bronchiectasis diagnosed by cHRCT was based on an inside bronchial diameter-to-adjacent artery ratio >0.8 . None of the children with bronchiectasis had cystic fibrosis.
Study cohort and specimens
The study cohort was a subset of children <10 years of age sequentially enrolled in either (i) an observational study of paediatric CSLD at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Australia, between October 2011–October 2012 or (ii) an observational study of children undergoing bronchoscopy at the Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, between February 2011 and November 2012 [48, 49]. Children (<10 years of age) undergoing flexible bronchoscopy for a clinical indication, excluding cystic fibrosis, were eligible for inclusion in the Brisbane-based study . Children undergoing cHRCT and flexible bronchoscopy for investigation of chronic cough and suspected bronchiectasis were eligible for the Darwin-based study . The CSLD cohort included all children prospectively recruited to the Darwin-based study and five randomly selected children from the Brisbane-based study. The PBB and control cohorts included all children with these diagnoses prospectively recruited to the Brisbane-based study who had sufficient specimens stored for bacterial analyses (28/30 children with PBB and 10/12 disease controls). The control children had undergone bronchoscopy for assessment of other clinical presentations (e.g. stridor, recurrent croup, unexplained dyspnea) associated with underlying diagnoses of tracheomalacia (n = 6), laryngomalacia, and bronchomalacia (n = 2), granulation on the vocal cords (n = 1) and an absent cardiac segment (n = 1).
An OP swab, NP swab and two sequential BAL specimens were collected while the children were under general anaesthesia. Identical specimen collection protocols were used for the Darwin- and Brisbane-based studies [48, 49]. The OP and NP swabs were collected immediately prior to insertion of the bronchoscope. The NP swabs were collected by placing a rayon-tipped swab into the nasopharynx via a single nostril; the swab was rotated for 2–3 seconds before being withdrawn and placed in a tube containing 1 mL STGGB. The OP swabs were collected by swabbing the anterior and posterior pillars then placed in 1 mL of STGGB. Bronchoscopy with collection of BAL was performed as per the European Respiratory Society guidelines . The BAL were collected using two volumes of sterile normal saline (1 mL/kg to a maximum of 10 mL for the first volume, Lavage-1; and 2 mL/kg to a maximum of 20 mL for the second volume, Lavage-2) which was instilled into the lobe and suctioned immediately into a mucus trap. Lavage-1 sampled the most affected lobe (as determined by cHRCT) or the right middle lobe if cHRCT results were not available. Lavage-2 was collected from the same lobe as Lavage-1. The aliquots of Lavage-l and Lavage-2 were diluted in equivalent volumes of 2× concentrated STGGB for bacterial analyses. All specimens were transported to the laboratory on ice bricks for processing and storage within 2 hours, with all specimens in STGGB stored at −80 °C prior to bacterial analyses.
Bacterial analyses were performed using DNA extracted from 200 μL of swab media (OP and NP swabs) and 400 μL of BAL in STGGB (equivalent to 200 μL of neat BAL). DNA extraction was done using QIAamp columns (QIAgen) with bead beating pre-treatment as detailed in Additional file 1. A dedicated DNA aliquot was used to determine the total bacterial load in each extract. The bacterial load was estimated using qPCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene , as described previously . Briefly, each 10 μL qPCR reaction included 1× SensiMix™ SYBR® reagent (Bioline), 300 nM of each primer (forward primer: 5′- TCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT -3′; reverse primer: 5′- GGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCCTGTT -3′) and 1 μL of template DNA. The reaction conditions were an initial hold at 50 °C for 2 min followed by incubation at 95 °C for 10 min then 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 45 s. Melt-curve analysis was then done between 80 and 90 °C with 0.1 °C steps. Low bacterial load was defined as <103 GE/μL extracted DNA, as this level was recommended previously for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analyses [24, 25].
Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene V1-3 regions was performed using a Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium platform as detailed in Additional file 1. Four DNA extraction negative controls and two aliquots of a reproducibility control were also sequenced. The reproducibility control was used to measure variation between sequencing batches. It contained DNA extracted from a pool of five OP swabs that were all taken from an adult volunteer. DNA was extracted from the pooled OP swabs then aliquoted and stored at −80 °C prior to sequencing. Results for the negative and reproducibility controls are detailed in Additional file 1. Raw sequence data are available upon request and subject to permission from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees.
Quality filtering of sequence data was done using mothur (version 1.33.3)  according to the 454-SOP [52, 53] with the following modifications: the sff.multiple command was used to combine data from multiple sff files; sequences with one or more mismatches in the barcode were excluded. OTUs were defined based on 97 % sequence similarity and taxonomic classifications were assigned using the SILVA reference alignment (release 102) . Where reference to the SILVA alignment did not identify OTUs beyond the family level, BLASTn  was used to assign taxonomy based on 100 % coverage and >98 % identity. Additional filtering was performed to exclude probable contaminant OTUs and sequencing errors (referred to collectively as probable contaminant OTUs) that arise during amplification of specimens with low bacterial load. This was done as earlier studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between bacterial load and detection of spurious OTUs [24, 26]. Probable contaminant OTUs arising from sequencing of specimens with low bacterial biomass and contaminants detected in negative controls were identified and excluded from further analysis as described in Additional file 1. A complete list of all OTUs excluded from downstream analyses is presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. Following exclusion of contaminant OTUs, subsampling to a depth of 1025 reads was performed based on review of rarefaction curves and Good’s coverage. Specimens with fewer than 1025 reads were excluded from further analysis [24, 26].
Biostatistical analyses were performed using Stata/IC version 14.0 (StataCorp LP, USA). All tests were two-tailed; significant results were indicated by a p value of <0.05 unless otherwise stated. Median with binomial-based 95 % CI was used to describe data that were not normally distributed. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for significant differences between two groups. Comparison of multiple groups was done using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post hoc Dunn’s test with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Statistical dependence between continuous variables was determined using a Spearman’s rank correlation. Box and whisker plots were generated to show the interquartile range (IQR; boxes), median (line within the box), upper and lower adjacent values (whiskers) and outliers (dots). Graphical figures were prepared with Stata/IC or R version 3.2.3  with the ggplot2  and beeswarm  packages.
Analyses of alpha and beta diversity in the microbiota were performed using PRIMER (version 6.1.15) [27, 59]. Simpson’s index of diversity (1-D) was used to assess the diversity of the bacterial community structures; this measure takes OTU richness and relative abundance into account. Beta diversity was assessed using a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix based on square root transformed OTU-level data. The SIMPER routine was used to identify OTUs contributing most to variation between specimens and diagnostic groups. Hierarchical group average cluster analysis was performed with similarity profile permutation test to determine if paired specimens clustered together with significant similarity. Similarity between the microbiota in different specimens was visualised using unconstrained principal coordinate analysis. PERMANOVA was used to test for significant differences between the microbiota in different specimen types. The PERMANOVA was done using a crossed-design with specimen type designated as a fixed factor and child designated as a random factor. The Type III sums of squares method was used with permutation of residuals under a reduced model and 9999 permitted permutations. One-way PERMANOVA to test for significant differences between the microbiota in each diagnostic group was performed using the Type III sums of squares method with unrestricted permutation of raw data. Where PERMANOVA detected significant differences in the microbiota between clinically defined groups, a discriminant canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) was used to identify principal coordinates that best explained variation in the microbiota. In contrast to principal coordinate analysis which identifies axes that best explain the overall variability in the data, CAP is a constrained test that identifies principal coordinates that best discriminate a priori defined groups . The CAP analysis was done to identify the principal coordinates with the lowest misclassification error (equivalent to those that best discriminated the groups). CAP diagnostics were performed using a leave-one-out allocation procedure to identify the number of axes (m) required to minimise the misclassification error. The CAP eigenvalues of the squared canonical correlations were used to indicate the ability of the corresponding axes to separate the a priori defined groups. The significance of differences detected by CAP analysis was determined using the permutation-based trace statistic .
BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CAP, canonical analysis of principal coordinates; cHRCT, chest high-resolution computed tomography; CSLD, chronic suppurative lung disease; df, degrees of freedom; GE, genome equivalents; NP, nasopharyngeal; OP, oropharyngeal; OTUs, operational taxonomic units; PBB, protracted bacterial bronchitis; PCO1, first principal coordinate axis; PCO2, second principal coordinate axis; PCoA, principal coordinates analysis; PERMANOVA, permutational multivariate analysis of variance; SIMPER, similarity percentages routine
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the parents and families of the children enrolled in our study. We thank Dr. Derek Sarovich for his assistance with the high-power computing unit and Ms. Jemima Beissbarth, Dr. Susan Pizzutto, Dr. Gabrielle McCallum and Dr. Helen Petsky for their assistance with data management and data cleaning.
RLM, HCS-V, ABC and MJB are supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowships 1034703, 1024175, 545216 and 1088733. The study was supported by the NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Respiratory Health for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (1040830) and the Channel 7 Children’s Research Foundation (Project Grant 12500). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the NHMRC. Funding organisations had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, manuscript preparation or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Availability of data and materials
Raw sequence data are available upon request and subject to permission from the relevant Human Research Ethics Committees.
All authors contributed to the study conception, the design, and the result interpretation. ABC and HCS-V coordinated the specimen and data collection. Laboratory analyses were performed by RLM. Data analysis was performed by RLM, MK, MJB and CEP. All authors contributed to the manuscript drafting and have approved the final version to be published.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin (HREC 07/63 and 09/02) and the Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane (HREC 2003/017 and 200800064). Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/carer of each child.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bassis CM, Erb-Downward JR, Dickson RP, Freeman CM, Schmidt TM, Young VB, et al. Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. MBio. 2015;6(2):e00037.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dickson RP, Martinez FJ, Huffnagle GB. The role of the microbiome in exacerbations of chronic lung diseases. Lancet. 2014;384(9944):691–702.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Forton J. Induced sputum in young healthy children with cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:6–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whiteson KL, Bailey B, Bergkessel M, Conrad D, Delhaes L, Felts B, et al. The upper respiratory tract as a microbial source for pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Parallels from island biogeography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(11):1309–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van der Gast CJ, Cuthbertson L, Rogers GB, Pope C, Marsh RL, Redding GJ, et al. Three clinically distinct chronic pediatric airway infections share a common core microbiota. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(7):1039–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong DS, Grimwood K, Carlin JB, Carzino R, Olinsky A, Phelan PD. Bronchoalveolar lavage or oropharyngeal cultures to identify lower respiratory pathogens in infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996;21(5):267–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang AB, Smith-Vaughan HC, Sloots TP, Valery PC, Whiley D, Beissbarth J, et al. Upper airway viruses and bacteria detection in clinical pneumonia in a population with high nasal colonisation do not relate to clinical signs. Pneumonia. 2015;6:48–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Stevens MJ, Szefler SJ, Accurso FJ, et al. Assessment of airway microbiota and inflammation in cystic fibrosis using multiple sampling methods. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):221–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brown PS, Pope CE, Marsh RL, Qin X, McNamara S, Gibson R, et al. Directly sampling the lung of a young child with cystic fibrosis reveals diverse microbiota. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(7):1049–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rogers GB, Carroll MP, Serisier DJ, Hockey PM, Jones G, Kehagia V, et al. Use of 16S rRNA gene profiling by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to compare bacterial communities in sputum and mouthwash samples from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(7):2601–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Goddard AF, Staudinger BJ, Dowd SE, Joshi-Datar A, Wolcott RD, Aitken ML, et al. Direct sampling of cystic fibrosis lungs indicates that DNA-based analyses of upper-airway specimens can misrepresent lung microbiota. PNAS. 2012;109(34):13769–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Botero LE, Delgado-Serrano L, Cepeda ML, Bustos JR, Anzola JM, Del Portillo P, et al. Respiratory tract clinical sample selection for microbiota analysis in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Microbiome. 2014;2:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boutin S, Graeber SY, Weitnauer M, Panitz J, Stahl M, Clausznitzer D, et al. Comparison of microbiomes from different niches of upper and lower airways in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116029.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Biesbroek G, Tsivtsivadze E, Sanders EA, Montijn R, Veenhoven RH, Keijser BJ, et al. Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(11):1283–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mackenzie G, Leach A, Carapetis J, Fisher J, Morris P. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carriage of respiratory bacterial pathogens in children and adults: cross-sectional surveys in a population with high rates of pneumococcal disease. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10(1):304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hare KM, Grimwood K, Leach AJ, Smith-Vaughan H, Torzillo PJ, Morris PS, et al. Respiratory bacterial pathogens in the nasopharynx and lower airways of Australian indigenous children with bronchiectasis. J Pediatr. 2010;157(6):1001–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakwinska O, Bastic Schmid V, Berger B, Bruttin A, Keitel K, Lepage M, et al. Nasopharyngeal microbiota in healthy children and pneumonia patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(5):1590–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Teo SM, Mok D, Pham K, Kusel M, Serralha M, Troy N, et al. The infant nasopharyngeal microbiome impacts severity of lower respiratory infection and risk of asthma development. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):704–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cardenas PA, Cooper PJ, Cox MJ, Chico M, Arias C, Moffatt MF, et al. Upper airways microbiota in antibiotic-naive wheezing and healthy infants from the tropics of rural Ecuador. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46803.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vissing NH, Chawes BL, Bisgaard H. Increased risk of pneumonia and bronchiolitis after bacterial colonization of the airways as neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(10):1246–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bisgaard H, Hermansen MN, Bonnelykke K, Stokholm J, Baty F, Skytt NL, et al. Association of bacteria and viruses with wheezy episodes in young children: prospective birth cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4978.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Marsh RL, Binks MJ, Beissbarth J, Christensen P, Morris PS, Leach AJ, et al. Quantitative PCR of ear discharge from indigenous Australian children with acute otitis media with perforation supports a role for Alloiococcus otitidis as a secondary pathogen. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2012;12:11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology. 2002;148(1):257–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014;12:87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Biesbroek G, Sanders EAM, Roeselers G, Wang X, Caspers MPM, Trzciński K, et al. Deep sequencing analyses of low density microbial communities: working at the boundary of accurate microbiota detection. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32942.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jervis-Bardy J, Leong LE, Marri S, Smith RJ, Choo JM, Smith-Vaughan HC, et al. Deriving accurate microbiota profiles from human samples with low bacterial content through post-sequencing processing of Illumina MiSeq data. Microbiome. 2015;3:19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Anderson M, Gorley R, Clarke K. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. 2008.Google Scholar
- Dickson RP, Huffnagle GB. The lung microbiome: new principles for respiratory bacteriology in health and disease. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(7):e1004923.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Balemans WA, Rovers MM, Schilder AG, Sanders EA, Kimpen JL, Zielhuis GA, et al. Recurrent childhood upper respiratory tract infections do not reduce the risk of adult atopic disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(2):198–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert S, O’Grady KA, Gabriel S, Carter R, Nolan T. The cost of seasonal respiratory illnesses in Australian children: the dominance of patient and family costs and implications for vaccine use. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2004;28(4):510–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odutola A, Antonio M, Owolabi O, Bojang A, Foster-Nyarko E, Donkor S, et al. Comparison of the prevalence of common bacterial pathogens in the oropharynx and nasopharynx of Gambian infants. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75558.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chappuy H, Keitel K, Gehri M, Tabin R, Robitaille L, Raymond F, et al. Nasopharyngeal carriage of individual Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes during pediatric radiologically confirmed community acquired pneumonia following PCV7 introduction in Switzerland. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hyde ER, Petrosino JF, Piedra PA, Camargo Jr CA, Espinola JA, Mansbach JM. Nasopharyngeal Proteobacteria are associated with viral etiology and acute wheezing in children with severe bronchiolitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1220–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciofu O, Johansen HK, Aanaes K, Wassermann T, Alhede M, von Buchwald C, et al. P. aeruginosa in the paranasal sinuses and transplanted lungs have similar adaptive mutations as isolates from chronically infected CF lungs. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12(6):729–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aanaes K. Bacterial sinusitis can be a focus for initial lung colonisation and chronic lung infection in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12 Suppl 2:S1–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leach AJ, Boswell JB, Asche V, Nienhuys TG, Mathews JD. Bacterial colonization of the nasopharynx predicts very early onset and persistence of otitis media in Australian aboriginal infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13(11):983–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith-Vaughan H, Byun R, Nadkarni M, Jacques NA, Hunter N, Halpin S, et al. Measuring nasal bacterial load and its association with otitis media. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2006;10(6):10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang AB, Brown N, Toombs M, Marsh RL, Redding GJ. Lung disease in indigenous children. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2014;15(4):325–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feazel LM, Santorico SA, Robertson CE, Bashraheil M, Scott JA, Frank DN, et al. Effects of vaccination with 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) on the nasopharyngeal microbiome of Kenyan toddlers. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128064.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mika M, Mack I, Korten I, Qi W, Aebi S, Frey U, et al. Dynamics of the nasal microbiota in infancy: a prospective cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):905–12. e11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill AT, Campbell EJ, Hill SL, Bayley DL, Stockley RA. Association between airway bacterial load and markers of airway inflammation in patients with stable chronic bronchitis. Am J Med. 2000;109(4):288–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prevaes SM, de Winter-de Groot KM, Janssens HM, de Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Tramper-Stranders GA, Wyllie AL, et al. Development of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in infants with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(5):504–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien KL, Bronsdon MA, Dagan R, Yagupsky P, Janco J, Elliott J, et al. Evaluation of a medium (STGG) for transport and optimal recovery of Streptococcus pneumoniae from nasopharyngeal secretions collected during field studies. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(3):1021–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Satzke C, Turner P, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Adrian PV, Antonio M, Hare KM, et al. Standard method for detecting upper respiratory carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: updated recommendations from the World Health Organization Pneumococcal Carriage Working Group. Vaccine. 2013;32(1):165–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wurzel DF, Marchant JM, Yerkovich ST, Upham JW, Mackay IM, Masters IB, et al. Prospective characterization of protracted bacterial bronchitis in children. Chest. 2014;145(6):1271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang AB, Bell SC, Byrnes CA, Grimwood K, Holmes PW, King PT, et al. Chronic suppurative lung disease and bronchiectasis in children and adults in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust. 2010;193(6):356–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kapur N, Masel JP, Watson D, Masters IB, Chang AB. Bronchoarterial ratio on high-resolution CT scan of the chest in children without pulmonary pathology: need to redefine bronchial dilatation. Chest. 2011;139(6):1445–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pizzutto SJ, Grimwood K, Bauert P, Schutz KL, Yerkovich ST, Upham JW, et al. Bronchoscopy contributes to the clinical management of indigenous children newly diagnosed with bronchiectasis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;48(1):67–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang AB, Yerkovich ST, Gibson PG, Anderson-James S, Petsky HL, Carroll ML, et al. Pulmonary innate immunity in children with protracted bacterial bronchitis. J Pediatr. 2012;161(4):621–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Blic J, Midulla F, Barbato A, Clement A, Dab I, Eber E, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage in children. ERS Task Force on bronchoalveolar lavage in children. European Respiratory Society. Eur Res J. 2000;15(1):217–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mothur 454-SOP. http://www.mothur.org/wiki/454_SOP. Accessed May 2014.
- Mothur Silve Reference Files. http://mothur.org/wiki/Silva_reference_files. Accessed May 2014.
- BLASTn. http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. Accessed Sept 2015.
- R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
- Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eklund A. beeswarm: the bee swarm plot, an alternative to stripchart. R package version 0.2.1 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=beeswarm.
- Clarke K, Gorley R. PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E; 2006.Google Scholar