- Correspondence
- Open access
- Published:
Bacteroides salyersiae is a potent chondroitin sulfate-degrading species in the human gut microbiota
Microbiome volume 12, Article number: 41 (2024)
Abstract
Chondroitin sulfate (CS) has widely been used as a symptomatic slow-acting drug or a dietary supplement for the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis. However, CS could not be absorbed after oral intake due to its polyanionic nature and large molecular weight. Gut microbiota has recently been proposed to play a pivotal role in the metabolism of drugs and nutrients. Nonetheless, how CS is degraded by the human gut microbiota has not been fully characterized. In the present study, we demonstrated that each human gut microbiota was characterized with a unique capability for CS degradation. Degradation and fermentation of CS by the human gut microbiota produced significant amounts of unsaturated CS oligosaccharides (CSOSs) and short-chain fatty acids. To uncover which microbes were responsible for CS degradation, we isolated a total of 586 bacterial strains with a potential CS-degrading capability from 23 human fecal samples. Bacteroides salyersiae was a potent species for CS degradation in the human gut microbiota and produced the highest amount of CSOSs as compared to other well-recognized CS-degraders, including Bacteroides finegoldii, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, and Bacteroides ovatus. Genomic analysis suggested that B. salyersiae was armed with multiple carbohydrate-active enzymes that could potentially degrade CS into CSOSs. By using a spent medium assay, we further demonstrated that the unsaturated tetrasaccharide (udp4) produced by the primary degrader B. salyersiae could serve as a “public goods” molecule for the growth of Bacteroides stercoris, a secondary CS-degrader that was proficient at fermenting CSOSs but not CS. Taken together, our study provides insights into the metabolism of CS by the human gut microbiota, which has promising implications for the development of medical and nutritional therapies for osteoarthritis.
Video Abstract
Introduction
Osteoarthritis is a painful, disabling, and slowly developing degenerative disease that affects about 240 million people globally [1,2,3]. Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is a dominant family of sulfated linear polysaccharides that exist ubiquitously both on the cell surfaces and in the extracellular matrices of the human body [4,5,6]. Previous studies have indicated that CS is the most abundant structural component in the cartilage of the human joint tissues [4, 7, 8]. In this regard, following the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), CS has widely been used as a symptomatic slow-acting drug (SYSADOA) or a dietary supplement for the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis [9, 10]. However, the use of CS for the management of osteoarthritis is still under debate since it cannot be absorbed after oral intake due to its polyanionic nature and large molecular weight [11,12,13,14]. Gut microbiota has recently been proposed to play a pivotal role in the metabolism of drugs and nutrients [15,16,17]. Nonetheless, how CS is degraded by the human gut microbiota has not been fully characterized [18].
Results and discussion
To address this issue, we first investigated the degradation profiles of CS by the human gut microbiota from 23 individuals using in vitro anaerobic fermentation (Fig. 1A). We found that each human gut microbiota was characterized by a unique capability for CS degradation (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Figure S1 and S2). For example, the gut microbiota of donor T25 only utilized about 20% of the original CS while that of donor T32 utilized more than 70% of the original CS in the culture medium (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Figure S2). However, on average, the human gut microbiota degraded and fermented about 40% of the original CS within 48 h (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Figure S2). This suggested that CS was a readily degradable polysaccharide for most individuals’ gut microbiota and thus might be used as a microbiota-accessible carbohydrate (MAC).
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are major fermentation products of MACs in the human gut [19]. With the help of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), we found that CS fermentation by the human gut microbiota produced a significant amount of SCFAs that were dominated by acetate, propionate, and butyrate (Fig. 1C). Although succinate, lactate, and isovalerate were also detected in the medium, they were produced at a much smaller amount (Fig. 1C). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS further confirmed that CS was degraded by the human gut microbiota to produce a series of unsaturated CS oligosaccharides (CSOSs) with a degree of polymerization (dp) ranging from 2 to 8 (Fig. 1D–F; Supplementary Figure S2 and S3). However, it should be noted that although different CSOSs were produced at the very first 24 h, the tetrasaccharide (udp4), hexasaccharide (udp6), and octasaccharide (udp8) were further degraded by the gut microbiota to produce disaccharide (udp2) as the fermentation continued (Fig. 1E, F; Supplementary Figure S3). Moreover, udp2 was the only degradation product left in the culture medium after 36 h (Fig. 1E, F; Supplementary Figure S2 and S3).
Due to the polyanionic nature and large molecular weight, CS could not be directedly absorbed after oral intake [11,12,13]. However, previous human and animal studies have well demonstrated that CS could be absorbed in the form of udp2 after oral intake [11, 14]. In view of the above results, our study suggested that the gut microbiota might to some extent be able to contribute to the absorption of CS in the intestine by degrading it into oligosaccharides. However, more detailed studies are needed to verify this possibility.
Using 16S rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, we found a significant change in the composition of the human gut microbiota before and after fermentation (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Figure S4). Besides, some genera were enriched upon cultivation in the medium containing CS as the major carbon source (Supplementary Figure S4 and S5), suggesting the possibility that they might have degraded and utilized CS as a substrate for their growth. We next wondered which bacteria were responsible for CS degradation in the human gut microbiota. To answer this question, we isolated a total of 586 bacterial strains with a potential CS-degrading capability from all 23 human fecal samples using the well-established enrichment culture method (Fig. 2B, C; Supplementary Figure S6 and Table S1). 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny suggested that these fecal isolates belonged to 48 different species of bacteria (Fig. 2C; Supplementary Figure S7 and Table S1). This implied that the CS-degrading capability might be widely distributed among the human gut microbiota. Additionally, distinct species of bacteria were isolated from the fecal samples of different individuals (Fig. 2C; Supplementary Figure S6). This indicated that each individual was characterized by its own unique bacteria for CS degradation, a further argument for the individualized metabolism of CS by the human gut microbiota.
With all the 48 species of intestinal bacteria in hand, we next sought to investigate and compare their degrading capabilities. Bacteroides salyersiae, Bacteoides finegoldii, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and Bacteroides ovatus were identified as top 5 degraders for CS in the human gut microbiota (Supplementary Figure S7). Preceding studies have shown that B. finegoldii, B. xylanisolvens, B. thetaiotaomicron, and B. ovatus are well-recognized CS-degraders in the human gut [20]. In line with previous results [17, 20], we found that these bacteria could degrade approximately 26 to 59% of the original CS within 72 h (Supplementary Figure S7). However, the amount of CS consumed by these bacteria was relatively smaller as compared to that consumed by B. salyersiae, a proficient CS-degrader identified in the present study (Fig. 3; Supplementary Figure S7–S9). Even in the very first 24 h, up to 85% of the original CS was successfully degraded by B. salyersiae (Supplementary Figure S7). This made B. salyersiae a potent CS-degrader within the gut microbiota of the 23 individuals. Besides, CS degradation by B. salyersiae produced the highest amount of CSOSs as compared to that produced by the four well-established CS-degraders (Fig. 3F; Supplementary Figure S10–S12). Additionally, B. salyersiae grew very well in both the liquid and solid culture medium containing CS as the major carbon source (Figs. 3A and 4A, B). The major degradation product produced by B. salyersiae was udp4 and the major fermentation product produced by B. salyersiae was propionate (Fig. 3B–E; Supplementary Figure S12).
To exclude the possibility that the CS-degrading capacity was specific to the particular isolate of B. salyersiae obtained in the present study, we further tested the CS-degrading capacity of another human gut bacterium B. salyersiae FL17. Although this strain was not isolated from the aforementioned 23 individuals using the enrichment culture method, it was found to have the same CS-degrading capacity as compared to the one isolated in the present study (Supplementary Figure S13). Both strains degraded CS to produce CSOSs in the culture medium (Supplementary Figure S13). Besides, both strains utilized an equal amount of CS during fermentation (Supplementary Figure S13). Altogether, our study suggested that the CS-degrading capacity of B. salyersiae identified in the present study was possibly a general characteristic of this species.
Given that B. salyersiae was a potent species for CS degradation in the 23 human fecal samples tested in our study, we then wondered how CS was degraded by this specific gut anaerobe. To answer this question, we sequenced the whole genome of B. salyersiae. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that the genome size of B. salyersiae was 5,561,372 bp and the G + C content in the genome was 41.95% (Supplementary Figure S14). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and clusters of orthologous groups (COG) function analysis indicated that most of the identified genes in B. salyersiae were involved in the carbohydrate transport and metabolism pathway (Fig. 4C; Supplementary Figure S14), suggesting that this bacterium might be skilled at degrading and metabolizing dietary polysaccharides. In this sense, we next analyzed the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in the genome of B. salyersiae. A total of 334 genes were identified as responsible for the expression of different classes of CAZymes including glycoside hydrolases (GHs), glycosyltransferases (GTs), polysaccharide lyases (PLs), carbohydrate esterases (CEs), carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs), and auxiliary activities (AAs) in this bacterium (Fig. 4D).
The CAZymes that target the glycosidic bonds in CS from the Bacteoides spp. have been extensively studied [20]. Based on previous results [21,22,23], our genomic analysis suggested that PL29, PL8_3, and GH88 were candidate CS-metabolizing enzymes in B. salyersiae (Supplementary Table S2–S4). Besides, genes coding the starch utilization system (Sus) proteins were also identified in the genome of B. salyersiae (Supplementary Table S2–S4). The Sus proteins in Bacteoides spp. have been well-demonstrated to capture and transport different glycans [20, 23, 24]. Altogether, based on these bioinformatics results, we tentatively put forward a possible model for understanding the degradation of CS by B. salyersiae (Fig. 4E). However, although we have clearly demonstrated that CS was degraded by B. salyersiae, the CAZymes activities of this bacteria shown in the model have not been confirmed using genetic or biochemical approaches in the present research. Future studies are therefore warranted to further investigate the detailed molecular mechanisms involved in the degradation of CS by B. salyersiae.
As aforementioned, CS degradation by B. salyersiae produced a significant amount of udp4 in the culture medium (Fig. 3; Supplementary Figure S12). In this light, we next wondered if the produced udp4 could be further utilized by other anaerobes in the gut. To address this question, a spent medium assay was conducted to screen the candidate bacterium that could utilize the udp4 produced by B. salyersiae in the culture medium (Fig. 5A; Supplementary Figure S15). Of all the 54 different species of bacterial isolates tested, only Bacteroides stercoris was found to have the capability for udp4 utilization (Fig. 5; Supplementary Figure S16). This suggested that the udp4-utilizing capability might be very specific to only a few species of anaerobes in the human gut.
B. stercoris utilized about 40% of udp4 in the spent medium within 48 h (Fig. 5B–F; Supplementary Figure S16 and Figure S17). Besides, fermentation of udp4 by B. stercoris produced significant amounts of acetate and propionate (Supplementary Figure S16). Nonetheless, it should be noted that B. stercoris itself was not a good CS-degrader as it only degraded about 20% of the original CS in the culture medium even after 72 h (Supplementary Figure S7). Collectively, these results indicated that the udp4 produced by the primary degrader B. salyersiae had the potential to serve as a “public goods” molecule for the growth of B. stercoris, a secondary CS-degrader that was skilled at utilizing CSOSs but not CS (Fig. 5G).
Our study does not rule out the possibility that other CSOSs such as udp2, udp6, and udp8 might also be able to mediate the cross-feeding interactions between the primary and secondary CS-degraders in the human intestine. This could be the subject of future research. The ability of B. stercoris to utilize udp4 produced by B. salyersiae suggested that some bacteria might have co-evolved to work synergistically to degrade CS in the human gut. The cross-feeding interactions between B. salyersiae and B. stercoris identified in the present study provided a framework for understating the degradation and metabolism of CS in the human gut.
The evolution of the metabolic cross-feeding interactions between specific bacteria in the human intestine has been proposed to be driven by different factors [25,26,27]. Our study demonstrated that the udp4 produced by the primary degrader during the metabolism of CS could serve as a “public goods” nutrient for the growth of the secondary degrader in the same niche. In accordance with previous results [28,29,30], our findings reinforced the notion that intermediate oligosaccharides produced during the degradation of complex carbohydrates had the potential to drive the multi-species symbiotic cross-feeding in the human gut. These results opened a new window for understanding the modulatory effect of CS on the human gut microbiota. This is critically important since in vivo studies have well demonstrated that the gut microbiota is deeply involved in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis [31,32,33] and that changes in the composition of gut microbiota are determining factors for achieving the therapeutic effect of CS in vivo [34,35,36].
Conclusions
Taken together, in the present research, we comprehensively investigated the detailed degradation profiles of CS by the gut microbiota from 23 healthy individuals and illustrated that B. salyersiae was a potent species for CS degradation in the human intestinal microbiota (Fig. 6). Our study suggested that B. salyersiae was potentially a keystone species for CS degradation in the human intestine. The udp4-based cross-feeding interactions identified in our study provide insights into the metabolism of CS by the human gut microbiota, which has promising implications for the development of medical and nutritional therapies for osteoarthritis.
Availability of data and materials
The whole genome sequence of B. salyersiae CSP6 was deposited in the GenBank under the accession number CP133452. The BioProject and BioSample accession numbers were PRJNA1007784 and SAMN37098068, respectively. The high-throughput sequencing data of the 16S rRNA gene amplicons of the human gut microbiota before and after fermentation was deposited in the GenBank under the BioProject number PRJNA1011813.
Abbreviations
- CS:
-
Chondroitin sulfate
- SCFAs:
-
Short-chain fatty acids
- CSOSs:
-
Chondroitin sulfate oligosaccharides
- dp:
-
Degree of polymerization
- udp2:
-
Unsaturated disaccharide
- udp4:
-
Unsaturated tetrasaccharide
- udp6:
-
Unsaturated hexasaccharide
- udp8:
-
Unsaturated octasaccharide
- CAZymes:
-
Carbohydrate-active enzymes
- PLs:
-
Polysaccharide lyases
- GHs:
-
Glycoside hydrolases
- CEs:
-
Carbohydrate esterases
- GTs:
-
Glycosyltransferases
- CBMs:
-
Carbohydrate-binding modules
- AAs:
-
Auxiliary activities
- Sus:
-
Starch utilization system
- PULs:
-
Polysaccharide utilization loci
- TLC:
-
Thin layer chromatography
- HPLC:
-
High-performance liquid chromatography
- UPLC:
-
Ultra-performance liquid chromatography
- MS:
-
Mass spectrometry
- KEGG:
-
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- COG:
-
Clusters of orthologous groups
- TEM:
-
Transmission electron microscope
- SYSADOA:
-
Symptomatic slow-acting drug for osteoarthritis
- EULAR:
-
European League Against Rheumatism
- ESCEO:
-
European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases
- MAC:
-
Microbiota-accessible carbohydrate
- CFUs:
-
Colony forming units
- OD:
-
Optical density
References
Nelson AE. Osteoarthritis year in review 2017: clinical. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018;26(3):319–25.
Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, Conaghan PG, Cooper C, Goldring MB, Goldring SR, Jones G, Teichtahl AJ, Pelletier JP. Osteoarthritis Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16072.
Wieland HA, Michaelis M, Kirschbaum BJ, Rudolphi KA. Osteoarthritis - an untreatable disease? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(4):331–44.
Bishnoi M, Jain A, Hurkat P, Jain SK. Chondroitin sulphate: a focus on osteoarthritis. Glycoconj J. 2016;33(5):693–705.
Mikami T, Kitagawa H. Biosynthesis and function of chondroitin sulfate. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(10):4719–33.
Mikami T, Kitagawa H. Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycans function as extra/pericellular ligands for cell surface receptors. J Biochem. 2023;173(5):329–32.
Watanabe H, Yamada Y, Kimata K. Roles of aggrecan, a large chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in cartilage structure and function. J Biochem. 1998;124(4):687–93.
Cs-Szabó G, Roughley PJ, Plaas AH, Glant TT. Large and small proteoglycans of osteoarthritic and rheumatoid articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;38(5):660–8.
Kloppenburg M, Kroon FP, Blanco FJ, Doherty M, Dziedzic KS, Greibrokk E, Haugen IK, Herrero-Beaumont G, Jonsson H, Kjeken I, Maheu E, Ramonda R, Ritt MJ, Smeets W, Smolen JS, Stamm TA, Szekanecz Z, Wittoek R, Carmona L. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(1):16–24.
Bruyère O, Honvo G, Veronese N, Arden NK, Branco J, Curtis EM, Al-Daghri NM, Herrero-Beaumont G, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Rannou F, Rizzoli R, Roth R, Uebelhart D, Cooper C, Reginster JY. An updated algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;49(3):337–50.
Lamari FN, Theocharis AD, Asimakopoulou AP, Malavaki CJ, Karamanos NK. Metabolism and biochemical/physiological roles of chondroitin sulfates: analysis of endogenous and supplemental chondroitin sulfates in blood circulation. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20(6–7):539–50.
Baici A, Hörler D, Moser B, Hofer HO, Fehr K, Wagenhäuser FJ. Analysis of glycosaminoglycans in human serum after oral administration of chondroitin sulfate. Rheumatol Int. 1992;12(3):81–8.
Conte A, de Bernardi M, Palmieri L, Lualdi P, Mautone G, Ronca G. Metabolic fate of exogenous chondroitin sulfate in man. Arzneimittelforschung. 1991;41(7):768–72.
Volpi N. Oral bioavailability of chondroitin sulfate (Condrosulf) and its constituents in healthy male volunteers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002;10(10):768–77.
Javdan B, Lopez JG, Chankhamjon P, Lee YJ, Hull R, Wu Q, Wang X, Chatterjee S, Donia MS. Personalized mapping of drug metabolism by the human gut microbiome. Cell. 2020;181(7):1661-1679.e22.
Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature. 2019;570(7762):462–7.
Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Separating host and microbiome contributions to drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Science. 2019;363(6427):eaat9931.
Shang Q, Yin Y, Zhu L, Li G, Yu G, Wang X. Degradation of chondroitin sulfate by the gut microbiota of Chinese individuals. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;86:112–8.
Sonnenburg ED, Sonnenburg JL. Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates. Cell Metab. 2014;20(5):779–86.
Rawat PS, Seyed Hameed AS, Meng X, Liu W. Utilization of glycosaminoglycans by the human gut microbiota: participating bacteria and their enzymatic machineries. Gut Microbes. 2022;14(1):2068367.
Ndeh D, Munoz Munoz J, Cartmell A, et al. The human gut microbe Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron encodes the founding member of a novel glycosaminoglycan-degrading polysaccharide lyase family PL29. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(46):17906–16.
Ndeh D, Baslé A, Strahl H, et al. Metabolism of multiple glycosaminoglycans by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron is orchestrated by a versatile core genetic locus. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):646.
Brown HA, Koropatkin NM. Host glycan utilization within the Bacteroidetes Sus-like paradigm. Glycobiology. 2021;31(6):697–706.
Bolam DN, Koropatkin NM. Glycan recognition by the Bacteroidetes Sus-like systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012;22(5):563–9.
D’Souza G, Shitut S, Preussger D, Yousif G, Waschina S, Kost C. Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria. Nat Prod Rep. 2018;35(5):455–88.
Oña L, Giri S, Avermann N, Kreienbaum M, Thormann KM, Kost C. Obligate cross-feeding expands the metabolic niche of bacteria. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(9):1224–32.
Culp EJ, Goodman AL. Cross-feeding in the gut microbiome: Ecology and mechanisms. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(4):485–99.
Baxter NT, Schmidt AW, Venkataraman A, Kim KS, Waldron C, Schmidt TM. Dynamics of human gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in response to dietary interventions with three fermentable fibers. mBio. 2019;10(1):e02566-18.
Rakoff-Nahoum S, Coyne MJ, Comstock LE. An ecological network of polysaccharide utilization among human intestinal symbionts. Curr Biol. 2014;24(1):40–9.
You HJ, Si J, Kim J, et al. Bacteroides vulgatus SNUG 40005 restores Akkermansia depletion by metabolite modulation. Gastroenterology. 2023;164(1):103–16.
Chisari E, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Friedrich AW, Parvizi J. The relation between the gut microbiome and osteoarthritis: A systematic review of literature. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0261353.
Liu Y, Ding W, Wang HL, Dai LL, Zong WH, Wang YZ, Bi J, Han W, Dong GJ. Gut microbiota and obesity-associated osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(9):1257–65.
Yu XH, Yang YQ, Cao RR, Bo L, Lei SF. The causal role of gut microbiota in development of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(12):1741–50.
Wang Q, Huang SQ, Li CQ, Xu Q, Zeng QP. Akkermansia muciniphila may determine chondroitin sulfate ameliorating or aggravating osteoarthritis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1955.
Biver E, Berenbaum F, Valdes AM, Araujo de Carvalho I, Bindels LB, Brandi ML, Calder PC, Castronovo V, Cavalier E, Cherubini A, Cooper C, Dennison E, Franceschi C, Fuggle N, Laslop A, Miossec P, Thomas T, Tuzun S, Veronese N, Vlaskovska M, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R. Gut microbiota and osteoarthritis management: an expert consensus of the European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal diseases (ESCEO). Ageing Res Rev. 2019;55:100946.
Wei Z, Li F, Pi G. Association between gut microbiota and osteoarthritis: a review of evidence for potential mechanisms and therapeutics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:812596.
Acknowledgements
The authors were grateful to Guoyun Li, Chao Cai, Hao Jiang, and Chanjuan Liu for the discussions of the results. The authors were also grateful to Xiaoyan Lv and Xiaoyu Song for their help with project administration and coordination.
Funding
This research was funded and supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32101032 and 81991522), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021QC110), Taishan Scholars Program (tsqn202306339), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3008000/842312003 and 3008000/862201013139), Shandong Provincial Major Science and Technology Project (2021ZDSYS22 and 2020CXGC010601), Major Project of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (2022QNLM030004-4), Taishan Industry Leading Talent Project, and Taishan Scholars Climbing Project (TSPD20210304).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Q.S. and G.Y.; methodology, Q.S. and Y.W.; software, Y.W., M.M. and W.D.; validation, Q.S. and Y.W.; formal analysis, Y.W., M.M. and W.D.; investigation, Y.W., M.M. and W.D.; resources, Y.W., M.M. and W.D.; data curation, Y.W., M.M. and W.D.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.S. and Y.W.; writing—review and editing, Q.S.; supervision, Q.S. and G.Y.; visualization, Q.S. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, Q.S. and G.Y.; project administration, Q.S. and G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The human experiments for the collection of fecal samples were approved and supported by the Ethical Committee of the Ocean University of China, School of Medicine and Pharmacy (Permission No. OUC-2021–1011-01). The collection of the human fecal samples was conducted according to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines on the Protection of Research Participants.
Consent for publication
All the participants in the present study consented independently when donating the fecal samples. All the personal data generated during the research were kept confidential.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1:
Figure S1. TLC showing the degradation of CS by the human gut microbiota. The degradation was monitored at 12 hours (A), 24 hours (B), 36 hours (C), 48 hours (D), and 72 hours (E). Figure S2. Degradation of CS by the human gut microbiota. Relative CS content in the culture medium at 72 hours (A). UPLC-MS/MS analysis of CSOSs in the culture medium of donor T25 (B). Total ion chromatograms showing the elution profiles of CSOSs in the culture medium of donor T25 at different time points (C). Figure S3. Mass spectrum showing the signals of udp2 (A), udp4 (B), and udp6 (C) according to their m/z ratios. The CSOSs, including udp2, udp4, and udp6 were produced in the culture medium as a result of CS degradation by the human gut microbiota. Figure S4. Changes in the structure of the human gut microbiota before and after fermentation. Venn diagram showing the differences of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (A). Observed species (B). Chao1 index (C). Shannon index (D). Heatmap of the abundance of gut bacteria at the genus level (E). Figure S5. Differences in the composition of the human gut microbiota before and after fermentation. Wilcoxon rank-sum test analysis of the gut microbiota at the species level (A). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis of the gut microbiota at the species level (B). Only bacterial taxa with an LDA score of above 3.0 were listed. Figure S6. Isolation of CS-degrading bacteria from the human gut microbiota. Different species of bacteria were obtained from different human fecal samples (A-W). Figure S7. B. salyersiae CSP6 was identified as a potent bacterium for CS-degradation in the present study. Heatmap of the relative abundance of the consumed CS (A). Phylogenetic tree analysis of the CS-degrading bacteria based on the 16S rRNA gene (B). Figure S8. TLC showing the degradation of CS by different human fecal isolates. The results were presented from B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7 to H. porci E13-26 (A-I). Figure S9. TLC showing the degradation of CS by different human fecal isolates. The results were presented from E. durans E13-16 to S. oneidensis P30-2-30 (A-H). Figure S10. Degradation and fermentation of CS by B. finegoldii B36-12, B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7, B. xylanisolvens B33-17, and B. ovatus B33-4. Concentrations of different SCFAs in the culture medium of B. finegoldii B36-12 (A), B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7 (B), B. xylanisolvens B33-17 (C), and B. ovatus B33-4 (D). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Figure S11. CS degradation by B. finegoldii B36-12, B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7, B. xylanisolvens B33-17, and B. ovatus B33-4. UPLC-MS/MS analysis of CSOSs produced by B. finegoldii B36-12 (A), B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7 (B), B. xylanisolvens B33-17 (C), and B. ovatus B33-4 (D). Total ion chromatograms showing the elution profiles of CSOSs in the culture medium of B. finegoldii B36-12 (E), B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7 (F), B. xylanisolvens B33-17 (G), and B. ovatus B33-4 (H) at different time points. * p < 0.05. Figure S12. Mass spectrum showing the signals of udp4 (A), udp6 (B), and udp8 (C) according to their m/z ratios. The CSOSs, including udp4, udp6, and udp8 were produced in the culture medium as a result of CS degradation by B. salyersiae CSP6, B. finegoldii B36-12, B. xylanisolvens B33-17, B. thetaiotaomicron E1-7, and B. ovatus B33-4. Figure S13. Degradation of CS by different strains of B. salyersiae. TLC showing the degradation of CS by B. salyersiae CSP6 and B. salyersiae FL17 (A). Relative carbohydrate content in the culture medium at different time points (B). B. salyersiae FL17 was previously isolated from the fecal sample of a healthy individual. This individual has not participated in the present study. Figure S14. Genome analysis of B. salyersiae CSP6. COG function classification (A). KEGG pathway analysis (B). Figure S15. Screening of candidate bacteria that could utilize udp4 using the spent medium assay. TLC showing the utilization of udp4 by different human gut bacteria. (A). List of the tested bacteria (B). Figure S16. Cross-feeding interactions between B. salyersiae and B. stercoris identified using the spent medium assay. Relative carbohydrate content in the culture medium (A). Growth curve (B) and CFU analysis (C). Concentrations of total SCFAs (D), acetate (E), and propionate (F) in the culture medium of B. salyersiae and B. stercoris. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Figure S17. Mass spectrum showing the signal of udp4 according to the m/z ratio. The udp4 concentration in the spent medium was analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. Table S1. Summary of CS-degrading bacteria isolated from the human fecal samples. Table S2. Summary of the potential enzymes for CS degradation in B. salyersiae CSP6 based on the genomic analysis. Supplementary Table S3. Genome annotation of B. salyersiae CSP6. Supplementary Table S4. CAZyme annotation of B. salyersiae CSP6.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Ma, M., Dai, W. et al. Bacteroides salyersiae is a potent chondroitin sulfate-degrading species in the human gut microbiota. Microbiome 12, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01768-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01768-2