Skip to main content

The long-term gut bacterial signature of a wild primate is associated with a timing effect of pre- and postnatal maternal glucocorticoid levels

Abstract

Background

During development, elevated levels of maternal glucocorticoids (GCs) can have detrimental effects on offspring morphology, cognition, and behavior as well as physiology and metabolism. Depending on the timing of exposure, such effects may vary in strength or even reverse in direction, may alleviate with age, or may concern more stable and long-term programming of phenotypic traits. Maternal effects on gut bacterial diversity, composition, and function, and the persistence of such effects into adulthood of long-lived model species in the natural habitats remain underexplored.

Results

In a cross-sectional sample of infant, juvenile, and adult Assamese macaques, the timing of exposure to elevated maternal GCs during ontogeny was associated with the gut bacterial community of the offspring. Specifically, naturally varying maternal GC levels during early but not late gestation or lactation were associated with reduced bacterial richness. The overall effect of maternal GCs during early gestation on the gut bacterial composition and function exacerbated with offspring age and was 10 times stronger than the effect associated with exposure during late prenatal or postnatal periods. Instead, variation in maternal GCs during the late prenatal or postnatal period had less pronounced or less stable statistical effects and therefore a weaker effect on the entire bacterial community composition, particularly in adult individuals. Finally, higher early prenatal GCs were associated with an increase in the relative abundance of several potential pro-inflammatory bacteria and a decrease in the abundance of Bifidobacterium and other anti-inflammatory taxa, an effect that exacerbated with age.

Conclusions

In primates, the gut microbiota can be shaped by developmental effects with strong timing effects on plasticity and potentially detrimental consequences for adult health. Together with results on other macaque species, this study suggests potential detrimental developmental effects similar to rapid inflammaging, suggesting that prenatal exposure to high maternal GC concentrations is a common cause underlying both phenomena. Our findings await confirmation by metagenomic functional and causal analyses and by longitudinal studies of long-lived, ecologically flexible primates in their natural habitat, including developmental effects that originate before birth.

Video Abstract

Background

Gestation is a developmental phase highly sensitive to environmental exposures; from conception onwards, adverse conditions and the resulting prenatal maternal stress response can affect offspring developmental trajectories depending on the type and degree of the adversity, the timing of such challenges, and offspring sex [1]. In mammals, maternal stress and increased activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis are associated with increased glucocorticoid (GC) production, which can permeate the placenta and reach the developing embryo/fetus during gestation. Prenatal maternal GCs are typically associated with long-lasting effects on morphological, cognitive, and physiological traits of the offspring [2, 3]. Specifically, phenotypic functional changes in physiological and behavioral traits associated with increased exposure to GCs during gestation involve not only the offspring’s HPA axis and immune system but also altered gene expression, behavior, and brain functionality [1, 4, 5]. An altered gut–brain system can be associated with detrimental variation of physiological traits such as impaired response to stressors and gut inflammation and altered behavior [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Yet, little is known about the programming effects of maternal stress on the gut microbiota, the possible mediating role of offspring GC levels, and the potential permanence of dysbiotic states into adulthood in long-lived mammals.

Starting from birth, the gut microbiota plays a fundamental role in regulating host physiology and behavior: it modulates metabolic and immune responses and affects brain development and adult behavior. Studies on germ-free animals show that bacteria-deprived individuals differ considerably in the development of physiological systems typical of individuals hosting microbial organisms such as impaired immune system, increased HPA axis activity, and altered metabolism [16] and emphasized the fundamental role of the gut microbiota in modulating the HPA axis activity and the stress response. One example is the modulation of the exaggerated HPA stress response in germ-free mice reduced by Bifidobacterium infantis colonization or increased by mono-association with enteropathogenic Escherichia coli [6]. Also in germ-free mice, Enterococcus faecalis reduced corticosterone levels and thus the physiological stress response following social stress [7]. However, studies on germ-free mice may overestimate stress-related physiological outcomes associated with variation in the abundance of single bacterial species, as isolation and lack of host–environment interactions may mask more complex microbial community dynamics. Thus, studies on animal models interacting with a rich microbial environment may help unveil hidden microbial dynamics and provide a deeper understanding of the link between stress-related physiology and the gut microbiota.

Stress can alter the secretions and permeability of the gastrointestinal tract, impact mucosal regenerative processes, and affect gastrointestinal motility [8]. Bailey and Coe [9] investigated stress-induced changes in the gut bacteria of rhesus macaques following maternal separation and showed that separation stress at 6–9 months of age caused a decrease in several taxa, particularly lactobacilli. The decrease was associated with stress-related behavior and with opportunistic bacterial infection and thus susceptibility to disease [9]. Indeed, the release of catecholamines produced during the stress response can stimulate the proliferation of gram-negative organisms [10] with direct or indirect effects on the abundance of taxa such as Clostridium, Bacteroides, and Lactobacillus [9]. A recent study of the effect of physiological stress associated with the process of habituation to humans in gorillas revealed the association of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites with increased abundance of the genus Oscillobacter, the Clostridium cluster XIV, and the family Anaerolineaceae [11]. However, despite changes in a few specific taxa, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites and bacterial alpha diversity were not associated indicating that stress from habituation had little effect on the overall gut microbial composition and more studies on the stress physiology of wild populations are needed [11].

Greater diversity and richness in the microbial community may provide greater resilience to perturbations and resistance to pathogens, improve the stability of the microbiota, and ultimately promote health. In humans, gut microbial richness correlates with metabolic markers and individuals with lower richness tend to have a pro-inflammatory phenotype, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance [12]. The impoverishment of gut microbial alpha diversity may be associated with adverse health outcomes and altered behavior in human and non-human primates. For example, in mouse lemurs, rhesus macaques, chimpanzees, and humans, lower microbial richness is associated with infection by adenovirus, SIV, HIV, or enterocolitis [13,14,15,16]. Lower richness is also associated with stress, depressive-like, and anxiety-like behavior in humans and other primates [17,18,19], with Alzheimer’s disease in humans [20], and with helminth infections in yellow baboons and red colobus monkeys [21]. Interestingly, fecal microbiota transplantation from depressed patients (and with lower alpha-diversity) to microbiota-depleted rats induced alterations in tryptophan metabolism, depression-like, and anxiety-like behaviors in the recipient animals [20]. Despite growing evidence of a negative relationship between health and microbial diversity and richness, there are also several studies showing no association, and consequently, the debate on the use of diversity and richness as informative health markers is ongoing [11, 22, 23].

The gut microbiota seems very sensitive to stress, but the relationships between specific microbial taxa and host physiology are complex and tend to vary among host species, groups, and individuals. Nevertheless, some generalizations about the effect of specific taxa are possible. The phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidota (formerly Bacteroidetes) represent two of the most abundant gut taxa in several mammalian species including humans, and their prevalence is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Potentially, variation in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio may lead to dysbiotic states and metabolic dysfunction in humans and other primates as well [24,25,26]. This hypothesis is supported by rodent models, and studies on the effect of early-life stress on adults’ microbiota revealed a reduced Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio in adult females and an increased abundance of organisms associated with inflammation such as Prevotella, Akkermansia, and Flexibacter [27].

Among mammals, prenatal stress can strongly affect developmental trajectories of the brain function, HPA axis regulation, and other health-related traits [1, 3, 28, 29]. Consistently, in the study groups of wild Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis), prenatal maternal stress during early, but not late gestation, or during lactation is associated with a hyperactivation of the HPA axis in the offspring, which persists into adulthood [30]. Indeed, the effects of prenatal maternal adversity and fetal exposure to GC on offspring phenotypes may have different, sometimes opposing, directions depending on the timing of the exposure—whether the exposure increases during the early or late gestation or after birth can be critical in shaping specific developmental trajectories and subsequent phenotypes [1, 31,32,33], with potential consequences for reproduction, health, and fitness [34, 35]. Studies on the effect of maternal stress on offspring gut microbiota are still limited and target a few host species, usually rodent models, in a controlled environment or in captivity [4, 36,37,38]. To date, we know of only one study that tested the timing effect of prenatal stress on offspring gut microbiota in a long-lived animal; this study on rhesus macaques was conducted in a controlled environment, using artificially induced stress and investigated effects only in infants [39]. Little is known about the ecological validity of such models, and even less is known about the potential persistence of maternal effects on adult gut microbiota in long-lived animal species [40].

With this study, we aim to provide data to fill this knowledge gap by investigating the link between the variation in maternal GCs driven by naturally occurring stressors, measured during different sensitive periods of gestation and lactation, and offspring gut microbial diversity, function, and composition in wild Assamese macaques. In a cross-sectional design during one field season (2018–2019), fecal samples were collected per individual and season from infants (< 1 year), juveniles (4–5 years), and adults (6–10 years) for the concurrent analysis of GC levels and gut bacterial community composition. Information on maternal GC levels during early and late gestation as well as during lactation was available from previous studies on the same population. We predicted increased prenatal and postnatal maternal GCs to be negatively associated with measures of microbial alpha diversity, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio, and with dysbiotic states evident from changes in the relative abundance of specific taxa and their predicted function. We further investigated whether these effects may be mediated by increased offspring GCs in developmentally challenged offspring by including offspring GC levels as a variable in all statistical models.

Methods

Study population and data collection

From 2010 to 2019, we collected fecal samples from a wild population of Assamese macaques living in their natural habitat. The study location is Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary, a large, protected area that is part of a > 6500 km2 system of connected protected forests in northeastern Thailand. The study site (Huai Mai Sot Yai, 16° 27′ N, 101° 38′ E) is characterized by hilly terrain with a dry evergreen forest. The habitat has two distinct seasons: a hot and rainy season (rich: March–October) and a colder dry season (lean: November–February) [41,42,43]. Although fruit and food availability are higher during the rich season, resource availability fluctuates between years, and forest productivity is considered to be rather unpredictable [41,42,43,44].

The study population is mainly frugivorous, and the main part of the plant diet comprises fruit, pulp, and seeds. Individuals spend an important part of their feeding time slowly foraging for animal matter like insects, spiders, gastropods, small amphibians, and reptiles [41,42,43]. Assamese macaques are relaxed income breeders reproducing seasonally with 78% of births occurring between April and June (Schülke and Ostner unpublished data). Female reproduction depends on forest productivity and the probability of conception is positively associated with food availability and female condition [42]. The average length of gestation is estimated at 164 days [45]. Although infant suckling is observed through the first year of life, it is higher during the first 6 months and later it quickly decreases to zero [44]. Thus, we measured maternal postnatal GCs only for the first 6 months of life. All infant fecal samples used for DNA extraction and GC analysis were collected later, thus postnatal maternal GCs and infant offspring GCs were assessed at different times. Between 2010 and 2019, fecal samples from 30 mothers were collected during their gestation (n = 379, mean ± SD: 11.9 ± 5.7 per individual; preGC) and lactation (n = 564, 17.6 ± 6.2 per individual; postGC). Between June 2018 and July 2019, we collected fecal samples from the corresponding 30 offspring of different ages that lived in three different social groups: 231 (mean ± SD: 7.7 ± 2.3 per individual) samples were used to extract the information on GCs, and 217 (mean ± SD: 7.3 ± 1.9 per individual) were used to extract the information on gut bacterial communities. We measured fecal glucocorticoid metabolites and extracted information on the gut bacteria from offspring of the 2018 birth cohort (11 males and 5 females), juveniles born between 2014 and 2016 (4 males and 3 females), and individuals born before 2012 (adults, 2 males 5 females). Since the average length of gestation is 164 days, we divided gestation at day 82 into early gestation (gestation days 1–82) and late gestation (days 83–day of birth) and calculated specific means of GC concentration separately. We used two aliquots of fecal samples from offspring individuals to extract the information on GC metabolites and gut microbial community separately (see below).

Fecal sample collection and glucocorticoid metabolite (GC) analysis

Fecal samples of mothers and offspring were collected directly after defecation (Fig. 1) from the ground or vegetation and without urine contamination. The fecal material was homogenized and about 1 g of material was transferred into a 15-ml vial with 5 ml 80% watery ethanol. The samples were extracted at the field camp using a validated method [46] as described by Berghänel et al. [44]. We pipetted 2 ml of the resulting fecal extract containing the GCs into a polypropylene cup and successively stored all extracts at −20 °C until transportation to the endocrinology lab of the German Primate Center for GC metabolite analysis. The extracts were analyzed using an enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of immunoreactive 11ß-hydroxyetiocholanolone, a major metabolite of GCs in primate feces [47]. The assay has been validated for assessing adrenocortical activity in numerous primate species [47], including Assamese macaques [48, 49]. Extracts were diluted 1:200–1:4,000 with assay buffer before assays which were then carried out according to the method described in detail in Heistermann et al. [50]. Assay sensitivity was 12 pg/ml, and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of high- and low-value quality controls were < 10% and < 15%, respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Methodological approach performed to investigate the effect of maternal GCs on offspring gut bacterial community and function. Fa-c refers to offspring descendent from mothers A–C of wild Assamese macaques. Output graphs are icons only and do not represent actual data. Created with Biorender.com

Fecal sample collection, DNA extraction, amplification of 16S rRNA genes, and sequencing

We collected fecal samples of offspring directly after defecation (Fig. 1). We homogenized the samples by kneading them with gloved hands and put them in sterile 2-ml screw-top polypropylene cups filled with 1 ml RNAlater buffer solution, shook the samples, and then stored them for 24 h in the dark at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples were frozen at −20 °C until export to the Göttingen Genomics Laboratory at the University of Göttingen. Once in the lab, the samples were stored at −80 °C.

Samples stored at −80 °C were thawed on ice for 30 min. RNAlater was removed by centrifuging samples for 10 min at 13,000 rpm on a Thermo Electron Corp Heraeus Pico 21 (ThermoFisher Scientific). DNA was extracted from 150 mg of fecal matter with DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN, Cat. No./ID: 47016) following manufacturer instructions. DNA quantity and quality were assessed by spectrophotometry on a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples yielding a DNA concentration < 6 ng/µl were discarded and DNA extraction was repeated. We standardized DNA concentration per sample by dilution to 10 ng/µl. Using PCR primers as described by Klindworth and colleagues [51] we amplified the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Primers included adapters for MiSeq sequencing (underlined, forward primer: S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′, reverse primer: S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). PCRs were performed in triplicates with thermocycling protocols listed in Supplementary material (SI Amplification of 16S rRNA genes and sequencing: full procedure). Sequencing was conducted by the Göttingen Genomics Laboratory using Illumina MiSeq platform using dual indexing and MiSeq reagent kit v3 (600 cycles) as recommended by the manufacturer (SI Amplification of 16S rRNA genes and sequencing: full procedure).

16S rRNA gene sequence data deposition

The raw sequence data from the 16S rRNA gene amplicons were deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information and can be assessed under the BioProject accession number PRJNA795139.

Bioinformatic processing of amplicon data

Raw paired-end sequences were quality-filtered using fastp v0.20.0 [52] with a minimum phred score of 20, minimum sequence length of 50 bp and sliding window size of 4, read correction by overlap, and adapter removal of sequencing primers. Quality-filtered reads were merged with PEAR v0.9.11 [53], and 16S rRNA gene primers were trimmed with cutadapt v2.5 [54]. VSEARCH v2.15.0 [55] was used to sort and filter the sequences by size (allowed minimum length ≥ 300 bp), remove duplicates (--derep_fulllength), and denoise (--cluster_unoise, default settings). We further performed de novo chimera removal (--uchime3_denovo) followed by reference-based chimera removal (--uchime_ref) against the SILVA SSU 138.1 NR database [56] resulting the final set of Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs). Finally, merged and quality filtered sequences were mapped against ASVs with VSEARCH (--usearch_global) with default sequence identity threshold of 0.97. The bacterial lineage of each ASV were assigned by using BLASTn v2.9.0 + against SILVA SSU 138.1 NR [56]. Best hits were only accepted if \(\left(\frac{\%\mathrm{identity}+\%\mathrm{coverage}}2\right)\) ≥ 93 following the recommendation of SILVA team [56]. A total of 25,283,812 reads corresponding to 3934 ASVs were obtained from the 411 samples, with all samples achieving high read counts (mean ± SD = 61,517 ± 31,959 reads per sample, median = 54,126, range = 21,010–262,994).

Statistical analyses

To investigate the link between maternal GCs and potential detrimental dysbiosis in offspring’s gut bacteria, we began by exploring variation in microbial alpha diversity linked with prenatal maternal GCs during early and late gestation, postnatal maternal GCs, and associated with offspring GCs, sex, age, group, and season of data collection. The study subjects experienced the same environmental conditions in terms of food availability and climate during data collection. All analyses were performed in R Studio (Version 3.6.1) using the packages glmmTMB [57] and ancombc [58]. We ran GLMMs with a full-null model comparison to investigate several alpha diversity measures: pure richness-based estimators (ObservedASVs, ACE; Model 1a-1b), Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD) as phylogenetic richness estimator (Model 1c), and richness-evenness estimators (i.e., Shannon-Weaver, Inverse Simpson: Model 1d-1e). We ran all the models always including the same predictors: the average value of maternal GCs during early gestation (Early-preGC) and late gestation (Late-preGC), the average value of postnatal maternal GCs (PostGC), the average value of offspring GCs estimated separately for the rich and the lean season (OffspringGC), and the information on offspring sex, age category (infant, juvenile, adult), group (MST, MOT, SST), and season of data collection (rich, lean). We included the random intercept individual ID and the random slopes of Early-preGC, Late-preGC, PostGC, and OffspringGC within individual ID in all models. Because the inclusion of the random slopes of Early-preGC, Late-preGC, PostGC, and OffspringGC within individual ID caused no convergence of all full models, we removed the random slopes and re-ran reduced models. We removed all not significant interactions and included main terms in reduced models. All the covariates were logn-transformed and then z-transformed to achieve model requirements and improve the interpretability of predictors. We checked model stability and collinearity of predictors using the package performance which identified no collinear predictors. Each alpha diversity model dataset included 192 data points belonging to 30 subjects (mean = 6.4, SD = 2.07).

Successively, we performed the analysis of compositions with bias correction ANCOM-BC [58], which estimates the unknown sampling fractions and corrects the bias induced by their differences among samples. The absolute abundance data were modeled by ANCOM-BC using a linear regression framework. ANCOM-BC provides a statistically valid test with appropriate p-values, confidence intervals for differential abundance of each taxon, and controls the false discovery rate while maintaining adequate power in a computationally simple way of implementing the models. In total, we ran six separate ANCOM-BC analyses at phylum, family, and genus level for rich and lean season. We conducted separate analyses for the rich and the lean season since ancombc does not allow longitudinal analysis.

Before running ANCOM-BC, we merged the information on differential abundance derived from seasonal biological replicates of each subject into a single mean value per individual and season (rich season: 3.7 ± 1.0; lean season: 4.5 ± 1.5 samples). The predictors included in each ANCOM-BC model were always coded in the same way as the alpha diversity models except Age that was included as a continuous variable and z-transformed with mean = 0 and sd = 1 to avoid convergence issues and improve interpretation of each interaction term. We excluded the collinear predictor Group (VIF > 5). p-values were adjusted to control for false discovery rate [59] (Benjamini–Hochberg corrected p-values: pBh < 0.05). The model datasets on ANCOM-BC during the rich and lean seasons included 16 and 30 data points, respectively, because some individuals could not be adequately sampled in the rich season. To understand whether the effect of maternal and offspring GCs on gut microbial composition was constant across different seasons, we investigated the number of taxa significantly affected by the same model predictors during the rich and the lean season separately. Thus, we analyzed whether the effect direction of each predictor on different taxa was concordant or discordant between seasons.

We performed general linear models on the Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio (Firmicutes/Bacteroidota) using the same model predictors to investigate dysbiosis associated with maternal and offspring GCs moderated by age. We conducted a likelihood ratio test and obtained the p-values for each predictor variable using single-term elimination with the drop1 function in R [60]. The model datasets on Firmicutes/Bacteroidota during the rich and the lean seasons included 16 and 30 data points, respectively.

Functional profiling of gut bacteria

Bacterial genes were inferred from the 16S rRNA gene derived ASVs using PICRUSt2 (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) v2.5.1 [61]. We followed the standard PICRUSt2 protocols (GitHub page: https://github.com/picrust/picrust2/wiki) to investigate the predicted gene families using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthology (KO) database. PICRUSt2 prediction accuracy was assessed by calculating the weighted nearest sequence taxon index score (mean of NSTI = 0.133). We tested the effects of prenatal and postnatal maternal GCs in interaction with offspring age on the relative abundance of estimated functional KO categories grouped at level 3 of the KEGG pathway database using ANCOM-BC via the same methodological approach performed to investigate the gut bacterial community (see above).

Results

General gut bacterial community composition of free-living Macaca assamensis

The overall gut bacterial community composition was analyzed for the study population from 320 fecal samples collected from 51 subjects (6.3 ± 2.6 samples per subject), not all of whom had data on maternal GCs during development. Approximately 97% of the microbial composition was represented by seven bacterial phyla with similar composition during the rich and the lean seasons (Fig. 2A). Overall, the phylum Firmicutes was the most abundant one (59.3 ± 7.1%), followed by Bacteroidota (17.9 ± 5.2%), Spirochaetota (9.3 ± 6.5%), Proteobacteria (3.5 ± 3.2%), Verrucomicrobiota (2.9 ± 1.9%), Actinobacteriota (2.9 ± 5.3%), and Cyanobacteria (1.6 ± 1.1%). Together, the phyla Fibrobacterota (0.5 ± 0.7%), Desulfobacterota (0.4 ± 1.5%), Campylobacterota (0.3 ± 0.3%), and Elusimicrobiota (0.1 ± 0.4%) represented the remaining 3% (including 1.4% of unclassified bacteria).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gut bacterial community and effect of maternal GCs during the first half of gestation (Early-preGC) on alpha diversity measures in Assamese macaques during the study period, June 2018 to June 2019. Panel A shows the relative abundance of all bacterial phyla averaged by Season. Panel B shows the relative abundance according to Age and Season of the 20 most abundant families which accounted for 84.2% of the total composition. Panel C shows the effect of Early-preGC (z-transformed with mean = 0 and SD = 1) on Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD), observed ASVs, and abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) indices. Each model line is plotted with all the other model predictors at their average value. All panels were plotted with R and converted with Biorender.com to be consistent within the text

At the family level, almost 80% of the overall main composition was represented by 15 families (~ 85% by 20 families): Lachnospiraceae (17.19 ± 6.2%) was the most abundant family, followed by Prevotellaceae (10.1 ± 5.7%), Spirochaetaceae (9.2 ± 6.6%), Ruminococcaceae (8.6 ± 3.1%), Oscillospiraceae (7.7 ± 2.8%), UCG-010 of the order Oscillospirales (3.9 ± 1.8%), Rikenellaceae (3.2 ± 1.9%), uncultured bacteria from the Clostridia vadin BB60 group (2.9 ± 1.6%), Erysipelatoclostridiaceae (2.8 ± 2.3%), uncultured bacteria from the Clostridia UCG-014 (2.4 ± 1.4%), Christensenellaceae (2.1 ± 1.0%), uncultured bacteria from the order WCHB1-41 belonging to the class of Kiritimatiellae (2.1 ± 1.6%), Succinivibrionaceae (1.8 ± 3.1%), Butyricicoccaceae (1.7 ± 1.5%), uncultured bacteria from the Coprostanoligenes group of Oscillospirales (1.7 ± 0.8%), and finally Muribaculaceae (1.6 ± 1.0%) (Fig. 2B).

Maternal GCs during early gestation alter offspring’s bacterial diversity

Next, samples were filtered and only those belonging to individuals with complete information on maternal GCs during (early and late) gestation and lactation were retained. Thus, we estimated gut microbial alpha diversity from 192 fecal samples belonging to 30 subjects (6.4 ± 2.07 samples per subject). Overall, all full-models of alpha diversity consistently revealed no interaction effect of age with maternal GCs and with offspring GCs (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Therefore, we ran reduced models without non-significant interaction terms (Supplementary Table 3). Reduced models 1a-1c showed consistent results, and all predictors together clearly influenced the offspring’s gut bacteria alpha diversity in all models (Model 1a: χ2 = 72.85, df = 11, p < 0.001; Model 1b: χ2 = 91.98, df = 11, p < 0.001; Model 1c: χ2 = 66.38, df = 11, p < 0.001; Table 1, Supplementary Table 3). Increasing prenatal maternal GCs during early but not late gestation was significantly associated (or in one case tended to be) with a decrease in alpha diversity (Early-preGC: p1a = 0.068, p1b = 0.040, p1c = 0.018, Fig. 2C; Late-preGC: p1a = 0.503, p1b = 0.670, p1c = 0.999). Postnatal maternal GCs had a positive effect on alpha diversity, although only two models revealed a statistical trend (PostGC: p1a = 0.089, p1b = 0.054), and one revealed a non-significant effect on phylogenetic diversity (PostGC: p1c = 0.148). Surprisingly, the seasonal offspring GCs mean value had no effect on the model responses (OffspringGC: p1a = 0.395, p1b = 0.313, p1c = 0.987). Very consistently, Age, Season, and Group had the same significant effect in all alpha diversity models, while Sex had no effect on any response (Supplementary Table 3).

Table 1 Effects of model predictors on Faith’s phylogenetic diversity of offspring’s gut bacteria

The models analyzing the richness-evenness estimators (Model 1d-1e) showed different results (Supplementary Table 4). Although the reduced-null model comparison revealed that all predictors together influenced the alpha diversity of offspring gut bacteria (reduced-Null model comparison of Model 1d: χ2 = 29.26, df = 15, p = 0.015; Model 1e: χ2 = 20.08, df = 11, p = 0.044), only Season and Group had a significant effect on the Shannon index (Model 1d), while only Age[juv] and Group significantly affected the Inverse Simpson index (Model 1e). In both Model 1d and 1e, prenatal maternal GCs during early and late gestation and postnatal maternal GCs had no statistically significant effect on richness-evenness estimators (Supplementary Table 4).

Maternal GCs, offspring GCs, and overall variation in bacterial composition

The analysis of gut bacterial composition (ANCOM-BC) identified differentially abundant taxa according to predictors of interest such as Early-preGC, Late-preGC, PostGC, OffspringGC, Age, and Sex and their interactions. If a predictor variable was part of a significant interaction term, we do not report the summary statistics used to estimate variation in overall composition due to very limited interpretability. We provide a quantitative interpretation of predictor effects based on the percentage of taxa significantly affected, with the assumption that, regardless of effect size, the greater the number of taxa significantly affected, the greater the potential relevance of the model predictor in shaping the overall gut bacterial community composition.

Rich season

At the phylum level, early prenatal maternal GCs and postnatal maternal GCs in interaction with age were associated with moderate differences whereas late prenatal GCs in interaction with age had considerable effects on bacterial composition: 1 SD of variation in maternal GCs with 1 SD of variation in age was associated with significant changes in the abundance of 10–20% and 20–40% of phyla, respectively. Offspring GC or sex in interaction with age did not affect gut bacterial composition in relevant ways. At the family and genus level, variation in maternal GCs during all three time-windows in interaction with age had considerable effects on the bacterial composition, and offspring GC effects increased to a moderate level (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage of bacterial taxa differentially abundant according to model predictors moderated by offspring’s age. The composition is estimated for the rich and the lean season at the phylum, family, and genus level separately. The significance of the main terms of each interaction has limited interpretability and therefore they are not depicted. All the variables but sex have been z-transformed with mean = 0 and SD = 1 to increase model interpretability. Sex is coded with “female” as the reference category. Early-preGC = prenatal maternal GCs during early gestation, Late-preGC = prenatal maternal GCs during late gestation, PostGC = postnatal maternal GCs during lactation, OffspringGC = seasonal offspring GCs. The figure has been plotted with R and edited with Biorender

Table 2 Quantitative characterization of model predictors’ relevance

Lean season

Overall, the gut bacterial composition during the lean season was more anchored and less influenced by predictors. Minor variation in composition was observed at the family and genus level in response to an interaction of age with late preGCs and offspring GC (Fig. 3).

Bacterial composition and the effect of maternal GCs, offspring GCs, and age

Subsequent analyses focused on the direction of effects associated with prenatal and postnatal maternal GCs and offspring GCs in interaction with age. We report summary statistics on the modeled effect of maternal and offspring GCs at the mean of the variable age (equivalent to juveniles age class), mean + 1 SD (equivalent to adult age class), and mean-1 SD (roughly equivalent to infant age class). Exposure to maternal GCs before and after birth had significant effects on bacterial community composition depending on the age of the offspring and sampling season, but these effects during the lean season concerned less than 5% of taxa only (with one exception) and were typically less stable in the direction across age compared to effects during the rich season.

Rich season

Out of a total of 319 genera analyzed, 23.2% (74) were significantly affected by maternal GCs during early gestation moderated by age (Early-preGC*Age). The effect of a 1 SD increase in Early-preGC on differential abundance amplified with Age in 14.1% of the genera (positive: 4.7%; negative 9.4%), decreased with Age in 0%, and reversed in 9.1%. Late prenatal maternal GCs moderated by age (Late-preGC*Age) had a similar effect on microbial composition in terms of the number of genera significantly affected (84 out of 319, 26.3%). However, the effect of an increase of 1 SD of Late-preGC amplified with Age in only 1.6% of genera (positive: 0.6%; negative 1%), reduced in 3.8% (positive: 1.0%; negative: 2.8%), and reversed in as many as 20.9% of genera. A total of 85 out of 319 genera (26.6%) were affected by postnatal maternal GC moderated by age (PostGC*Age). The effect of PostGC amplified with Age in 1.9% of genera (positive: 0.3%; negative: 1.6%), weakened with Age in 4.1% (positive: 2.5%; negative: 1.6%) and mainly reversed with age in 20.6% of genera (Fig. 4). The ANCOM-BC analysis was repeated including only juveniles and adults and showed a similar effect of early-preGC on these genera (Supplementary Table 6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of different maternal predictors moderated by Age at sampling on the differential relative abundance of bacterial genera during the rich season. Panel A shows the effect of Early-preGC moderated by Age (Early-preGC*Age), panel B shows the effect of Late-preGC moderated by Age (Late-preGC*Age), and panel C shows the effect of PostGC moderated by Age (PostGC*Age). “UN” refers to undetermined/unclassified genus, and family or order is therefore reported. Colored bars indicate the effect direction (blue = positive, yellow = negative) of an increase in 1 SD of specific predictors (Early-preGC = 59.3 ng/g; Late-preGC = 67.0 ng/g; PostGC = 52.7 ng/g) estimated at the mean value of age (mean = 4.7 years), and at the mean value of all the other predictors. Red and black lines indicate the effect estimated at the mean plus 1 SD (red = 7.1 years) and at the mean minus 1 SD (black = 2.3) of age. Case example: Panel A 1st taxon from the right: when subjects are 4.7 years old (mean age), the abundance of Bifidobacterium experiences a 2.3 log-fold decrease with an increase in maternal GCs during the early gestation of 59 ng/g (1SD). When the subjects are 2.3 years old (mean age-1SD), the same increase in maternal GCs is associated with an 0.12 log fold increase in Bifidobacterium abundance (black whisker). Finally, when the subjects are 7.1 years old (mean age + 1 SD), the same increase in maternal GCs is associated with a 4.6 log-fold decrease in the abundance (red whisker). When the bar is not plotted, the effect of the same increase in maternal GCs at the mean age is 0. Taxa showing the black head (estimates at 2.3 years) further from 0 than the red head (estimates at 7.1 years) show an effect that is reduced with age

Finally, 65 out of 319 genera (20.4%) were affected by offspring GCs moderated by age (OffspringGC*Age). The effect of OffspringGC amplified with Age in 6% of genera (positive: 1.3%; negative: 4.7%), reduced in 2.2% (positive: 0.9%; negative: 1.3%), and reversed with Age in 12.2% (Fig. 5, Table 3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of concurrent OffspringGC moderated by Age (OffspringGC*Age) on the differential abundance of genera during the rich season. “UN” refers to undetermined genus, and family or order is therefore reported. Colored bars indicate the effect (blue = positive, yellow = negative) of an increase in 1SD of OffspringGC (SD = 130.1 ng/g) estimated at the mean value of age (mean = 4.7 years), and at the mean value of all the other predictors. Red and black lines indicate the effect of Late-preGC estimated at the mean + 1 SD (red = 7.1 years) and at the mean – 1 SD (black = 2.3 years) of age

Table 3 Effect of maternal and offspring GCs on gut bacterial composition

Lean season

Out of a total of 326 genera analyzed, only 11 were significantly affected by maternal GCs during early gestation moderated by age (Early-preGC*Age), all of which reversed with age. Late prenatal maternal GCs moderated by age (Late-preGC*Age) had a similarly small effect on bacterial composition in terms of number of genera significantly affected (26 out of 326). The effect of Late-preGC amplified with Age in 2 genera (both positive), reduced with Age in 1 taxon (negative), and reversed with Age in 11 genera. Postnatal maternal GCs moderated by age (PostGC*Age) had a neglectable effect on bacterial composition (2 out of 326 genera), and only 12 genera were affected by offspring GC moderated by age (OffspringGC*Age). The effect of OffspringGC amplified with Age in 1 taxon (positive), attenuated in 1 taxon (negative), and reversed with Age in 10 genera (Fig. 5).

The Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio

We detected seasonal differences in the effect of maternal and offspring GCs on the Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio (Firmicutes/Bacteroidota). While the full model on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidota during the lean season revealed no significant effect of all model predictors (full-null model comparison: full-Model Lean: χ2 = 11.95, df = 10, p = 0.335, Supplementary Table 5), the models on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidota during the rich season revealed an overall effect of all predictors together (full-null model comparison: full-Model Rich: χ2 = 34.01, df = 10, p < 0.001, Supplementary Table 5). We excluded the non-significant interaction Late-preGC*Age (p = 0.131) and ran a reduced model including the main term Late-preGC. Again, the reduced model revealed an overall effect of all model predictors on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio during the rich season (reduced-null model comparison: reduced-Model Rich: χ2 = 31.73, df = 9, p < 0.001, Table 4). In particular, both the Early-preGC moderated by Age (Early-preGC*Age) and Late-preGC as a main term were negatively associated with Firmicutes/Bacteroidota (Fig. 6A and C; Table 4), while the predictors associated with postnatal maternal GCs and offspring GCs had a positive effect (Fig. 6B and C, Table 4).

Table 4 Effect of model predictors on Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio
Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of significant predictors of reduced Model R explaining variation in the Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio (F:B) of offspring’s gut bacteria during the rich season. Panel A shows the effect of prenatal maternal GCs during the first half of gestation moderated by offspring’s age (Early-preGC*Age). Panel B shows the effect of postnatal maternal GCs moderated by offspring’s age (PostGC*Age). Panel C shows the effect of prenatal maternal GCs during the second half of gestation (Late-preGC). Panel D shows the effect of offspring GCs moderated by offspring’s age (OffspringGC*Age). The moderator Age is plotted at its mean and ± SD values (4.7 ± 2.4). Results on predictors shown in panels A and C corroborate the overall negative effect of prenatal maternal GCs on offspring F:B. The model response F:B is logn-transformed to meet model requirements and the predictors Early-PreGC, Late-PreGC, PostGC, and OffspringGC are logn-transformed and then z-transformed with mean = 0 and SD = 1 to meet model requirements and to increase model interpretability. Each panel is plotted with all other model predictors at their average value

Maternal GCs and offspring gut bacterial functional profile

The taxonomic changes associated with prenatal maternal GC during early gestation and age (Early-preGC*Age) corresponded to changes in the predicted function of Assamese macaque’s gut microbiota, as predicted by PICRUSt2. The predicted functions of the gut bacterial community during the lean season were only very weakly associated with variation in our predictors (Table 5).

Table 5 Effect of maternal GC on predicted microbial functional pathways (KOs at level 3) controlling for the effect of OffspringGC and Sex. Grey color indicates limited interpretability of individual predictors due to their computed interaction effect

During the rich season, Early-preGC*Age was associated with the enrichment of metabolic pathways and pathways involved in different types of diseases. Mostly enriched pathways involved terpenoid and polyketide metabolism, signal transduction processes by which cells detect and respond to changes in their environment, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Predicted functional pathways significantly affected by the prenatal maternal GCs and offspring age (Early-PreGC*Age). Colored bars indicate the log-fold change associated with an increase of 1 unit of EarlyPreGC*Age. Black bars indicate the number of KOs grouped at level 4 which contribute to each pathway. Heatmap indicates the significance of each pathway (BH adjusted p-values)

Late-preGC*Age was mostly associated with changes in glycan biosynthesis, characterized by a decrease in predicted Lipoarabinomannan and Arabinogalactan biosynthesis pathways and an enrichment of N-Glycan biosynthesis pathways. Late-preGC*Age was also associated with the enrichment of several terpenoid and polyketide metabolic pathways and a reduction in secondary metabolites. In addition, Late-preGC*Age was associated with a weak enrichment of the predicted pathways involved in amino acid metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 1). Maternal GCs during the first six months of lactation and offspring age (PostGC*Age) was associated with a general enrichment of the predicted pathways involved in bacterial infectious diseases (e.g., Shigellosis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus infections), alteration of secondary metabolites biosynthesis, and reduction of predicted terpenoid and polyketide metabolism. We observed also alteration of predicted microbial pathways involved in signal transduction, pathways of glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, and amino acid decreased, while we observed enriched lipid metabolic pathways (Supplementary Fig. 2). Offspring GC and age (OffspringGC*Age) was associated with a reduction in predicted microbial pathways associated with lipid metabolism (lower ether lipid metabolism and fatty acid degradation), metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, and with predicted infection of Staphylococcus aureus which decreased with age (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Finally, the overall effect of Early-preGC amplified with age in almost all the predicted functional microbial pathways contrarily to the effect of Late-preGC and PostGC which reversed with age, while the effect of OffspringGC was equally amplified and reversed with age (Table 6). The interpretations on the effects of variation in putative functional profiles associated with Late-preGC, PostGC, and OffspringGC must be taken carefully due to their strong variation mediated by age.

Table 6 Effect of maternal and offspring GCs on predicted gut bacterial functional pathways

Discussion

Cercopithecoid primates and humans share many similarities in their gut microbiomes, even more than apes and humans [62,63,64], making macaques a valuable model species for gut microbiome studies. For example, the microbial butyrate production pathways of catarrhines, including macaques, are more similar to those of humans than those observed in lemurs, platyrrhines, and apes after controlling for the effects of dietary strategy [62]. The high microbial diversity associated with the butyrate pathways of catarrhines and humans implies a more efficient short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) metabolism and may confer greater stability and resilience to perturbations. A higher diversity of microorganisms involved in amino acid degradation may confer stability in the face of large variations in diet composition, as seen in comparative butyrate-degradation patterns of industrialized and non-industrialized human populations [62]. The ecological and dietary flexibility of macaques is unique among non-human primates and is thought to underlie the widest latitudinal and longitudinal geographic distribution of all primate genera except Homo [65,66,67,68]. In addition, unlike germ-free mice, Assamese macaques offer a unique advantage for studying microbiota development in offspring in their natural context by providing a more accurate representation of microbiota development in a natural setting.

In the following, we first discuss the broad effects of age and season on the gut bacterial composition and then focus on the timing effects of maternal GC exposure and on the outcome in terms of known functions of taxa most profoundly affected by maternal GCs in our statistical models.

Seasonal and age differences on gut microbiome composition

Assamese macaques at the Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary (Thailand) can be classified as frugivorous, as they consume mainly fruit, pulp, and seeds, with no marked age- or sex-related differences in the diet composition of plant parts [42, 43]. However, they spend a considerable part of their feeding time opportunistically and slowly foraging for animal matter, regularly consuming large quantities of aquatic mollusks, spiders, ants, caterpillars, termites, and less regularly small snakes and lizards, amphibians, birds and bird eggs, and even small mammals including several species of rats and squirrels [43]. Assamese macaques from Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary consume at least 165 known plant items belonging to 118 plant species with a moderate overlap of the most common items between years [42]. As environmental conditions in forests of south-east Asia are highly unpredictable, the predictability of food and fruit abundances are also very low. Our study species, therefore, evolved to live in a highly unpredictable environment [44] and although the main part of its diet is based on plant parts, their gut microbiome must endure unpredictable variation in food type ingested which inevitably has to rely on and may benefit from higher gut microbiota diversity.

Among primates, age-related patterns of microbial richness variation are diverse, and the wild Assamese macaques investigated in this study appear to be more similar to humans than other genetically closer species like chimpanzees [69]. Our results showed an increase in bacterial richness from infants via juveniles to adults and are in line with studies on vervet monkeys, rhesus macaques, and humans [70,71,72] but contrast with observations in wild chimpanzees, common marmoset, and mouse lemurs [69, 73, 74].

Across age and seasons, the sum of the relative abundances of Lachnospiraceae, Prevotellaceae, Spirochetaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Oscillospiraceae was approximately 50%, making these families the most abundant ones in wild Assamese macaques. These groups comprise cellulolytic and fermentative taxa that can metabolize complex plant polysaccharides and degrade fibers. The higher abundance of Prevotella is a common trait of folivore/frugivore species and produces twice more propionate than bacterial communities dominated by Bacteroides [75]. As distinctive traits of most macaque species, also wild Assamese macaques revealed a high abundance of Spirochetaceae from the Treponema lineage, a genus whose functionality in the gut is still unexplored. Yet, many Treponema are fiber-degrading bacteria proposed to give a substantial contribution to short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production together with Prevotella by degrading xylan, xylose, and carboxymethylcellulose [76]. It is absent in humans living in urban environments but inhabits the gut of individuals from rural communities consuming termites [77].

Across seasons, the relative abundance of the top 20 taxa at the family or genus level did not differ markedly except for some taxa (Fig. 8): the rich season showed a higher relative abundance of the genera Blautia and Roseburia (Lachnospiraceae), Faecalibacterium, Catenibacterium, and Bifidobacterium, and the families Prevotellaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae, while the lean season showed higher relative abundance of Spirochetaceae, Rikenellaceae, Oscillospiraceae, and Clostridiaceae (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Relative abundance of the 20 most abundant (top) families and (bottom) genera observed in fecal samples of wild Assamese macaques collected during the rich (R, green bars) and the lean season (L, blue bars) at the Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary (Thailand). All the panels have been plotted with R and edited in Biorender.com

Typically, members of the Cercopithecidae show low relative abundance and diversity of Bifidobacterium compared to other primates [78, 79]. Yet, despite host-phylogenetic differences, Bifidobacterium is strongly affected by diet [79]. It is highly abundant in the gut of breastfed humans and nursing non-human primate infants and has a key role in the digestion of complex carbohydrates from milk [69, 80]. In the rich season of this study, when infants were still highly dependent on milk, Bifidobacterium relative abundance in wild Assamese macaques was highest in infants and decreased with age, it had a relative abundance of 3% across all age classes, but was almost absent in samples from the lean season. Higher abundance during the rich season may be driven by hosts consuming fruits and enriching their diet with animal matter like Assamese macaques having a higher abundance of Bifidobacteriaceae when compared with folivores, frugivores, and omnivores [78, 79]. Future investigations should focus more on direct quantification of animal matter consumption during the rich and the lean season to clarify seasonal variation of Bifidobacterium’s relative abundance.

We observed seasonal variation also in the abundance of Catenibacterium which was higher during the rich season. Organisms belonging to this taxon can harvest a high quantity of energy through the fermentation of carbohydrates and produce several SCFAs like butyrate, lactate, and acetate [81]. Catenibacterium has a higher relative abundance in wild long-tailed macaques when compared with captive individuals [82] and its increase is associated with higher energy storage in humans and rodent models. Thus, members of this genus can have a relevant role in the energy accumulation strategy of wild Assamese macaques which must be maximized during the rich season, the best period of the year for energy storage.

The timing effect of pre- and postnatal maternal GCs on gut bacterial composition and function

The effect of maternal stress on the programming of physiological phenotypes is a critical factor strongly influenced by the timing of exposure [1, 36, 44, 83,84,85,86,87]. We tested for the first time in a wild and long-lived species the effect of maternal GCs on bacterial diversity, composition, and predicted functional pathways according to three sensitive time windows: early gestation, late gestation, and postnatal maternal GCs during lactation. The effect of maternal GCs on gut bacterial alpha diversity varied according to the timing of exposure. Analyses consistently revealed a negative effect of prenatal maternal GCs during early gestation (Early-preGC) on gut bacterial diversity, but no significant effects from maternal GCs exposure during late gestation (Late-preGC) or postnatally during lactation (PostGC). Our results on the effect of naturally driven maternal GCs in wild individuals are also in line with studies on primates and rodents in captivity reporting a reduction in infants’ microbial diversity associated with experimentally induced stress during gestation [4, 36, 39]. Fetal exposure to maternal GCs affects HPA axis development and changes gut permeability by perturbing barrier functionality with consequent alteration of typical microbial colonization of the gut [2, 4, 5, 10, 17, 88,89,90,91,92].

The composition of gut bacteria during the lean season was only very weakly associated with variation in our predictors. During the rich season, however, bacterial composition was considerably changed with changing levels of maternal GCs and offspring age with a quarter of taxa being differentially abundant. While the proportion of taxa significantly affected was roughly similar for all pre- and postnatal phases, the effects either faded with age or reversed with age in response to Late-preGC or PostGC. In response to Early-preGC, the effects intensified with age (positively or negatively) in the vast majority of differentially abundant taxa.

Similarly, the PICRUSt2 predicted functional profiles of the gut bacteria during the lean season were very weakly associated with variation in our predictors. Instead, in samples collected during the rich season, we observed a significant variation in nearly 20% of the predicted functional pathways associated with variation in Early-PreGC which intensified with age. Again, the overall effect of maternal GC during late gestation was weaker than the effect during early gestation and tended to reverse with age. Although we observed a considerable overall effect of maternal GC during lactation on predicted microbial pathways this effect strongly reversed with age.

Thus, the timing of GC exposure had a pronounced effect on the persistence of a long-term gut bacterial signature. Our results on the timing effect of prenatal maternal GCs are in line with other studies that highlight the important role of maternal GC during early as opposed to late gestation in programming morphological or physiological phenotypes in long-lived primates [1, 33, 44] and expand the list of potentially detrimental effects programmed during the very first phases of fetal development.

Long-term signature of early prenatal maternal GCs

Early preGCs were not only associated with reduced gut bacterial richness all the way into adulthood but also with a previously unstudied reduction or increase in the relative abundance of 14% of the total genera that amplified with age. We observed a reduction in the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Acetivibrio, Succinivibrio, Olsenella, and Slackia, and this reduction intensified with age. Typically, Bifidobacterium abundance decreases with age in humans and non-human primates [93,94,95]. The presence of this health-promoting organism in the gut inhibits pathogen attachment to intestinal cells, promotes protection against enterocolitis and acute diarrhea by slowing down the replication of enteric pathogens, and is typically involved in folate biosynthesis and antioxidant production in human and non-human primates [72, 78, 79]. Long-term physiological stimulation of the innate immune system can be detrimental with age and can lead to inflammaging processes [96]. Our results suggest that prenatal maternal GCs effects on gut bacteria mimics the inflammaging process which would corroborate findings in rhesus macaques showing a signature of inflammaging in differential gene expression after exposure to the ecological effects of a recent hurricane [97]. The gut microbiome has a pivotal role in regulating these processes and an increase in the abundance of Bifidobacterium has been associated with improved health and longevity and with a reduction or even reversal of dysfunctions driven by inflammatory states associated with age [96]. During the rich season, older subjects were affected more negatively by early prenatal maternal GCs than younger ones. Thus, prenatal maternal GCs may accelerate the typical reduction in Bifidobacterium associated with age [93] in Assamese macaques with consequent long-term dysbiotic states in adult subjects which may benefit less from the health-promoted effect of this taxon. The wider age window for offspring in this study from infants to adults may explain discrepancies between these findings and a study on captive rhesus macaques confined to only infant offspring where not the early but the late prenatal maternal exposure to stress was associated with decreased relative abundance of Bifidobacterium [39]. Among the putative pathways of bacterial infectious diseases, we observed an increase in signals of bacterial invasions of epithelial cells, the adhesins/invasins. Both involved in the process of adhesion and invasion of host cells and are important virulence factors that enable microorganisms to cause disease. We believe this to be an indication that prenatal maternal GCs may accelerate the increase of susceptibility to infectious diseases normally associated with age. However, since we did not observe a significant increase in pathogenic bacteria associated with Early-PreGC, these results on gut bacterial function and infectious diseases need to be interpreted carefully.

Furthermore, we observed a reduction in the genus Oscillospira and an unclassified member of Oscillospiraceae with increasing early prenatal maternal GCs and age. Oscillospira is one of the most abundant genera observed in many primate species [98,99,100,101,102,103], including humans, and it has recently been proposed as a potential probiotic [104]. It is a slow-growing butyrate producer that ferments complex plant carbohydrates, can utilize host glycans as an energy source, and its abundance is negatively associated with pro-inflammatory molecules in rodent models [105] and with inflammatory disorders in humans [106,107,108], it is reduced in non-human primates with infections, in captivity or in individuals with higher inflammatory responses to cerebral infarction [14, 24, 102]. Oscillospira increases with age in several macaque species [100, 101, 109] and it is positively associated with bacterial diversity in humans [107]. Interestingly, wild Assamese macaques with higher prenatal GCs exposure showed lower Oscillospira abundance and richness, the same pattern observed in non-healthy humans [110, 111], and in captive or inflamed non-human primates [14, 24, 102], and lacked the typical increase observed with age in healthy individuals of other macaque species [100, 101, 109]. These results suggest a role of maternal GCs in altering the typical colonization of the abundant Oscillospira, with potential long-term detrimental effects in subjects with higher prenatal GCs exposure.

Additionally, the bacterial signature of increased early prenatal maternal GCs was characterized by an increase in the relative abundance of several pro-inflammatory organisms that amplified with age. We observed an increased abundance of a member of the Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae, aerotolerant taxa whose overgrowth is promoted by inflammation [112], Tyzzerella, a typical pro-inflammatory bacterium which increases intestinal permeability and correlates with circulating inflammatory outcomes and anxiety-like behavior [113,114,115]. Furthermore, early prenatal GC exposure was associated with an increase in the abundance of the pathobiont Gemella, a genus with Gram-positive facultative anaerobic organisms involved in gut inflammation [116], associated with an increased risk of all types of diabetes due to the production of endotoxins inducing inflammatory states [117, 118], and able to cause several diseases (e.g., endocarditis, sepsis, allergies, and asthma) [119].

Notably, we observed differences in two putative endocrine system functions which may be potentially altered by the gut microbiota—Early-PreGC*Age significantly increased the insulin and renin secretion pathways. Although we did not observe evidence of a direct effect on insulin resistance (adjusted p-value = 0.921), the sphingolipid signaling pathway was enriched. Among mammals, sphingolipids are fundamental structural and bioactive signaling molecules with important roles in the development of metabolic disorders and gut microbiota derived sphingolipids have been shown to signal into inflammation-related pathways in the colon [120,121,122,123,124]. Thus, it is possible that prenatal maternal GC exposure may translate into an epigenetically driven increase in gut-bacteria sphingolipid signaling pathways that could be associated with later chronic inflammatory states. In general, these predictions should be interpreted cautiously until our preliminary results are confirmed by direct testing. The long-term signature of early prenatal maternal GCs mediated by age seems to be associated with a plethora of pathways and signals indicative of increasing inflammatory states, disease, and cancer. Although this scenario is plausible, these results need to be considered with caution until direct tests on host inflammatory states and health will be conducted to validate the scientific merit.

Interestingly, a genus that changed against the pattern of decreased anti-inflammatory and increased pro-inflammatory taxon abundance was Butyricimonas—a butyrate producer that increased in relative abundance with Early-preGC and Age. Butyrate reduces inflammation in the gut, helps maintain gut integrity [125], and protects against infections [126]. Butyrate producers therefore contribute to the gut homeostasis by increasing the production of mucin which improves tight junction integrity [127]. Such findings could indicate a potential activation of the host immune function in Assamese macaques with higher prenatal GCs which may suffer from a reduced microbial richness and potential associated metabolic pathways and may rely mainly on fewer bacterial species to digest plant and animal matter, to harvest and store energy, and to produce SCFAs. Analyses of predicted microbial function showed no evidence of a significant decrease in the butyrate production and amino acid production in offspring with increasing Early-preGC. Thus, one interpretation is that a higher relative abundance of a few bacterial species that produce SCFAs and amino acids may compensate for the lack of diversity in SCFAs and amino acid producers. However, according to life-history theory, resource diversification may be adaptive or maladaptive depending on the environmental context [128]. In an unpredictable environment, like the ones Assamese macaques live in, putting all eggs in one basket represents a high risk, which can only be clarified by studies on the mediation role of the gut microbiome on the effect of prenatal maternal stress on fitness. Despite this one outlier, patterns of differential abundance associated with prenatal GC exposure are suggestive of inflammatory states exacerbating with age.

Other marked changes that amplified with offspring age when Early-preGCs increased were decreased abundances of taxa with metabolic functions like energy harvesting and storage. Acetivibrio is known to produce SCFA from fibers [129], and Succinivibrio is a glucose-fermenting organism promoting cellulose and hemicellulose digestion, producing succinic and acetic acids and helping in fatty acids metabolization which can increase the efficiency in energy utilization [130, 131]. We also observed a significant reduction in Olsenella, Collinsella, and an uncultured member of the Erysipelotrichaceae, all taxa associated with energy storage in a high-fat diet [63, 132,133,134,135,136] and with increased fruit consumption in gorillas and humans [137].

The gut bacteria of early prenatally challenged offspring was further characterized by a significant decrease in Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio. Their relationship is associated with lipid metabolism and an increase in their ratio is indicative of a more efficient capability of energy harvesting and a greater provision of beneficial SCFAs [82, 138]. A recent study investigating oral and gut bacteria, and body fat indices in wild versus captive long-tailed macaques revealed that wild subjects harbored higher gut and oral diversity, higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio, and had higher body fat indices when compared with captive individuals [82]. It is possible that individuals with higher prenatal maternal GCs may have an overall reduced capability of energy harvesting similarly observed in captive and leaner long-tailed macaques.

Being relaxed income breeders, Assamese macaques accumulate fat during the pre-mating season and rely on the rich season to store the fat necessary to energetically support the next gestation or the current lactation [41]. Early lactating females and those that are neither gestating nor lactating follow an energy-conserving strategy by storing as much fat as possible during the rich season [41] to ultimately increase their reproductive success. Indeed, fruit availability at Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary modulates conception rates, the peak of the energetically costly lactation period overlaps with the peak of fruit availability, and females exhibit poor physical condition during lactation [42]. Typically, females in our study population need time to recover from previous reproductive effort and skip reproduction in a given year if they gave birth late in the previous birth season [42]. As the best period to store energy is during the rich season, prenatal maternal stress can negatively impact the energy storage strategy during the fundamental step grounding Assamese macaques’ reproductive success by decreasing the relative abundance of several bacterial taxa involved in energy storage and SCFAs production. Although we observed significant alterations of putative metabolic pathways, our results on microbial function did not support these hypotheses. Most of the well-known microbial pathways involved in energy harvesting and storage were not affected by early prenatal maternal GC (e.g., starch and sucrose metabolism, metabolism of pyruvate and propanoate, pentose phosphate pathway, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, glycerophospholipid metabolism, linoleic acid metabolism). However, we observed variation in carbohydrate and lipid metabolic pathways that are not yet fully categorized in the KEGG database. Among the putative genes involved in the unclassified carbohydrate metabolism category, there were KOs related to the D-lactate dehydrogenase, myo-inositol catabolism, and acetoin utilization protein. Lactate dehydrogenase enzymes play an important role in cellular metabolism, helping to convert lactate to pyruvate and supporting the production of energy for the bacteria in the form of ATP. Myo-inositol catabolism is an important metabolic pathway for bacterial growth and survival allowing bacteria to utilize a wide range of carbon sources to generate ATP. Instead, acetoin is secreted during the exponential growth phase and also serves as a carbon storage compound which can be reused when other carbon sources have been exhausted. The ability of gut bacteria to utilize acetoin as an energy source is important for their survival in the gut environment, where there is competition for nutrients among different microbial species. Notably, acetoin it is also considered a “metabolic toxin” that can chemically modify host signaling molecules, such as hormones and neuro-transmitters, thereby affecting their biological activity and it has been suggested that increased production of acetoin by gut bacteria is associated with conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease [139, 140]. Further investigations on such uncategorized metabolic pathways and analysis of fecal SCFA profiles in Assamese macaques will help clarify how prenatal maternal GCs during early gestation alter gut microbiota metabolism of carbohydrates and lipids and its implications for host health.

In summary, the long-term signature observed in the gut bacterial community and associated with the exposure to maternal GC early during gestation (Fig. 9) affects the balance of pro-and anti-inflammatory taxa.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Microbial signature of maternal GCs during early-gestation observed across infant, juvenile, and adult age in wild Assamese macaques during the rich season. Exposure to maternal GC late during gestation or after birth had much weaker or less stable effects. Made with Biorender.com

It seems unlikely that in this study, the effects of early maternal GC exposure on gut bacteria were mainly mediated by increased HPA axis activity in challenged offspring. Both the early developmental and the concurrent offspring GC levels were included in all the statistical models. Variation inflation factor analyses suggest that their possible covariation in this dataset does not affect the significance of Early-preGC as a predictor. Offspring GC did not explain residual variation in gut bacterial community diversity and its effects on community composition were less broad on the phylum and family level and less stable across offspring age at the genus level. Thus, we believe that early prenatal maternal effects on gut bacteria are more likely to be mediated by alterations of gut microanatomy, physiology, and immunology of the epithelial wall including changes in permeability.

Offspring GCs and gut bacteria

Measures of offspring GCs were not associated with gut bacterial species richness measured from the same fecal sample in wild Assamese macaques which corroborates results on wild gorillas [11, 63] and Verreaux’s sifakas [141], but contrasts with other studies showing a negative effect in red squirrels [142, 143]. Quantitatively, offspring GC had an age-moderated effect on genus composition during the rich season only slightly smaller than that of prenatal and postnatal maternal GCs. However, the effect was less stable and less pronounced than Early-preGC and was similar to what observed in the function analyses results. Focusing on the effects that amplified with age, increasing seasonal offspring GC levels were associated with a higher relative abundance of the genus Victivallis and a lower abundance of unclassified members of Clostridia UCG-014 and Lactobacillaceae, Anaerosporobacter, Streptococcus, Paludicola, and Ruminiclostridium. Unfortunately, the information on metabolic function and potential pathogenicity of most of these organisms is still unexplored. Ruminiclostridium can secrete SCFAs; in the herbivore black goat, it is considered a potential beneficial bacterium positively involved in growth regulation and gut permeability and helps in maintaining homeostasis and morphology of intestine epithelial cells [144]. Streptococcus is a well-known genus with not only several potential pathogens but also beneficial species. Together with Bifidobacterium, members of the Streptococcus genus are commensal and are the major producers of lactic acid and acetate in humans with protection against enteropathogenic infection and inflammation reduction [145, 146]. Streptococcus is associated with increased degradation of fibers and increased production of SCFAs [147]. In obese humans, a reduction in beneficial Streptococcus was observed in subjects with a higher intake of dietary fructose [148]. A lower presence of Streptococcus could be associated with a lower production of beneficial SCFA and fiber degraders or a lower abundance of potential pathogens. However, our preliminary analyses of the age-mediated effects of offspring GC on putative gut bacterial functions also showed no evidence of strong variation in the metabolic functions. Notably, we observed a positive effect on potential Staphylococcus aureus infection pathway which, however, faded out with age, suggesting a potential detrimental effect interesting mostly infant and juvenile macaques. Finally, higher offspring GC levels were associated with higher Tyzzerella in infants and juveniles but not in adults suggesting an increase of a potentially pathogenic organism in young subjects with higher GCs which fades with age. However, pathogenicity confirmation requires genomic data with higher resolution at the strain level and was not part of this study.

GCs are metabolic hormones providing information on energy mobilization in response to energetic challenges. The stress response characterized by the release of GCs is an adaptive response to maintain physiological homeostasis during adverse conditions [149] including energy deficits [41]. During the rich season, higher offspring GCs levels were associated with higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio suggesting higher energy harvesting capability [150]. As the rich season represents the best time for wild Assamese macaques to store energy, an energy deficit is possible but unlikely. In the same study population and in the same individuals, prenatal maternal GCs induced a recalibration of offspring HPA axis activity with long-term hyperactivation and higher allostatic load in infants, juveniles, and adults [30]. One possibility is that if prenatally stressed individuals maintain a persistent hyperactivity of the HPA axis, perhaps a gut microbiota with enhanced capability of energy harvesting may serve to offset some of these costs. Rather puzzlingly, PICRUSt2 analyses of putative gut bacterial functions showed no evidence of potential effects of offspring GCs on energy harvesting or storage, leaving us with more questions than answers about host stress-induced changes in gut microbiome metabolism. Today, there is a need to better understand how variation in gut bacterial composition may affect energy balance, and future studies could focus on the investigation of metabolic markers to disentangle the role of the gut microbiota in mediating potential energetic constraints and adaptive strategies associated with early adversity.

Conclusion

In this study, we added ecological validity to models about prenatal stress and gut microbiome alterations tested in captivity and under controlled environmental conditions. Using multivariate regression models and ANCOM-BC approach on a cross-sectional sample, we assessed for the first time in a wild long-lived animal species the effect of maternal GCs on gut bacterial diversity, function, and composition of infant, juvenile, and adult offspring. Timing of the exposure was critically associated with variation in prenatal effects, and early gestation was confirmed as a fundamentally sensitive period for shaping offspring physiological phenotypes with persisting long-term effects. From infancy to adulthood, we observed a bacterial signature and dysbiotic states of prenatal maternal GCs characterized by an overall reduction in bacterial richness, an imbalance in the ratio of the detrimental to beneficial organisms with an increase of potentially pro-inflammatory organisms. The effect of maternal GCs during early gestation was more evident during the rich season, a pre-mating time window important for energy accumulation in Assamese macaques and necessary to support energetically the current lactation or the upcoming reproduction. Interestingly, higher offspring GC levels had no negative effect on richness and, with the caveat of being a correlational study, the prenatal maternal effects seem to be rather independent instead of being mediated by offspring GC levels. Finally, the bacterial signature under the effect of prenatal maternal GCs was characterized by a potential reduction in resource diversification with a higher potential risk for detrimental health and reduced fitness in an unpredictable environment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study, and the R codes used to generate analyses and figures, are available in the https://doi.org/10.25625/SFHRIT repository. The raw 16S RNA gene sequencing data are available in the BioProject database (ID: PRJNA795139) of the NCBI repository http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/795139.

References

  1. McGowan PO, Matthews SG. Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids, and developmental programming of the stress response. Endocrinology. 2018;159:69–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanson MA, Gluckman PD. Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology? Physiol Rev. 2014;94:1027–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Moisiadis VG, Matthews SG. Glucocorticoids and fetal programming part 1: outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:391–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gur TL, Palkar AV, Rajasekera T, Allen J, Niraula A, Godbout J, et al. Prenatal stress disrupts social behavior, cortical neurobiology and commensal microbes in adult male offspring. Behav Brain Res. 2019;359:886–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke AS, Wittwer DJ, Abbott DH, Schneider ML. Long-term effects of prenatal stress on HPA axis activity in juvenile rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol. 1994;27:257–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sudo N, Chida Y, Aiba Y, Sonoda J, Oyama N, Yu X-N, et al. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol. 2004;558:263–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu W-L, Adame MD, Liou C-W, Barlow JT, Lai T-T, Sharon G, et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature. 2021;595:409–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Stress and the gut: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;62:591–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey MT, Coe CL. Maternal separation disrupts the integrity of the intestinal microflora in infant rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol. 1999;35:146–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyte M, Ernst S. Catecholamine induced growth of gram negative bacteria. Life Sci. 1992;50:203–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vlčková K, Shutt-Phillips K, Heistermann M, Pafčo B, Petrželková KJ, Todd A, et al. Impact of stress on the gut microbiome of free-ranging western lowland gorillas. Microbiology. 2018;164:40–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McKenna P, Hoffmann C, Minkah N, Aye PP, Lackner A, Liu Z, et al. The macaque gut microbiome in health, lentiviral infection, and chronic enterocolitis. Ausubel FM, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasimuddin, Corman VM, Ganzhorn JU, Rakotondranary J, Ratovonamana YR, Drosten C, et al. Adenovirus infection is associated with altered gut microbial communities in a non-human primate. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13410. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Moeller AH, Shilts M, Li Y, Rudicell RS, Lonsdorf EV, Pusey AE, et al. SIV-induced instability of the chimpanzee gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:340–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Guillén Y, Noguera-Julian M, Rivera J, Casadellà M, Zevin AS, Rocafort M, et al. Low nadir CD4+ T-cell counts predict gut dysbiosis in HIV-1 infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12:232–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng P, Wu J, Zhang H, Perry SW, Yin B, Tan X, et al. The gut microbiome modulates gut–brain axis glycerophospholipid metabolism in a region-specific manner in a nonhuman primate model of depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:2380–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson KV-A. Gut microbiome composition and diversity are related to human personality traits. Hum Microbiome J. 2020;15:100069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jašarević E, Howard CD, Misic AM, Beiting DP, Bale TL. Stress during pregnancy alters temporal and spatial dynamics of the maternal and offspring microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13537.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Barelli C, Donati C, Albanese D, Pafčo B, Modrý D, Rovero F, et al. Interactions between parasitic helminths and gut microbiota in wild tropical primates from intact and fragmented habitats. Sci Rep. 2021;11:21569. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Plassais J, Gbikpi-Benissan G, Figarol M, Scheperjans F, Gorochov G, Derkinderen P, et al. Gut microbiome alpha-diversity is not a marker of Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. Brain Commun. 2021;3:fcab113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Worsley SF, Davies CS, Mannarelli M-E, Hutchings MI, Komdeur J, Burke T, et al. Gut microbiome composition, not alpha diversity, is associated with survival in a natural vertebrate population. Anim Microbiome. 2021;3:84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clayton JB, Al-Ghalith GA, Long HT, Tuan BV, Cabana F, Huang H, et al. Associations between nutrition, gut microbiome, and health in a novel nonhuman primate model. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11159. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pascale A, Marchesi N, Govoni S, Coppola A, Gazzaruso C. The role of gut microbiota in obesity, diabetes mellitus, and effect of metformin: new insights into old diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2019;49:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagpal R, Shively CA, Appt SA, Register TC, Michalson KT, Vitolins MZ, et al. Gut microbiome composition in non-human primates consuming a Western or Mediterranean diet. Front Nutr. 2018;5:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pusceddu MM, Aidy SE, Crispie F, O’Sullivan O, Cotter P, Stanton C, et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) reverse the impact of early-life stress on the gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139721. Public Library of Science.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cottrell EC. Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids and the programming of adult disease. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009;3. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/neuro.08.019.2009/abstract. Cited 2021 Mar 10.

  29. Reynolds RM. Glucocorticoid excess and the developmental origins of disease: two decades of testing the hypothesis – 2012 Curt Richter Award Winner. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Anzà S. Prenatal maternal stress effects in wild Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). Ediss. 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53846/goediss-9510.

  31. Berghänel A, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. Prenatal stress accelerates offspring growth to compensate for reduced maternal investment across mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E10658–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morgan CP, Bale TL. Early prenatal stress epigenetically programs dysmasculinization in second-generation offspring via the paternal lineage. J Neurosci. 2011;31:11748–55. Society for Neuroscience.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Schülke O, Ostner J, Berghänel A. Prenatal maternal stress effects on the development of primate social behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nettle D, Coall DA, Dickins T. Early-life adversity conditions and age at first pregnancy in British women. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278:1721–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tung J, Archie EA, Altmann J, Alberts SC. Cumulative early life adversity predicts longevity in wild baboons. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Z, Li N, Chen R, Lee T, Gao Y, Yuan Z, et al. Prenatal stress leads to deficits in brain development, mood related behaviors and gut microbiota in offspring. Neurobiol Stress. 2021;15:100333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Golubeva AV, Crampton S, Desbonnet L, Edge D, O’Sullivan O, Lomasney KW, et al. Prenatal stress-induced alterations in major physiological systems correlate with gut microbiota composition in adulthood. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;60:58–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zijlmans MAC, Korpela K, Riksen-Walraven JM, de Vos WM, de Weerth C. Maternal prenatal stress is associated with the infant intestinal microbiota. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;53:233–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bailey MT, Lubach GR, Coe CL. Prenatal stress alters bacterial colonization of the gut in infant monkeys. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004;38:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Baniel A, Petrullo L, Mercer A, Reitsema L, Sams S, Beehner JC, et al. Maternal effects on early-life gut microbiota maturation in a wild nonhuman primate. Curr Biol. 2022;0. Elsevier. Available from: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(22)01359-8. Cited 2022 Oct 19.

  41. Touitou S, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. The effect of reproductive state on activity budget, feeding behavior, and urinary C-peptide levels in wild female Assamese macaques. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heesen M, Rogahn S, Ostner J, Schülke O. Food abundance affects energy intake and reproduction in frugivorous female Assamese macaques. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1053–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schülke O, Pesek D, Whitman BJ, Ostner J. Ecology of Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis) at Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. J Wildlife Thailand. 2011;18(1):1– 15.

  44. Berghänel A, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. Prenatal stress effects in a wild, long-lived primate: predictive adaptive responses in an unpredictable environment. Proc R Soc B. 2016;283:20161304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fürtbauer I, Schülke O, Heistermann M, Ostner J. Reproductive and life history parameters of wild female Macaca assamensis. Int J Primatol. 2010;31:501–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shutt K, Setchell JM, Heistermann M. Non-invasive monitoring of physiological stress in the Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla): validation of a fecal glucocorticoid assay and methods for practical application in the field. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012;179:167–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Heistermann M, Palme R, Ganswindt A. Comparison of different enzymeimmunoassays for assessment of adrenocortical activity in primates based on fecal analysis. Am J Primatol. 2006;68:257–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ostner J, Heistermann M, Schulke O. Dominance, aggression and physiological stress in wild male Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). Horm Behav. 2008;54:613–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fürtbauer I, Heistermann M, Schülke O, Ostner J. Low female stress hormone levels are predicted by same-or opposite-sex sociality depending on season in wild Assamese macaques. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;48:19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Heistermann M, Ademmer C, Kaumanns W. Ovarian cycle and effect of social changes on adrenal and ovarian function in Pygathrix nemaeus. Int J Primatol. 2004;25:689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal. 2011;17:10–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2584. PeerJ Inc.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lin H, Peddada SD. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3514. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300. [Royal Statistical Society, Wiley].

    Google Scholar 

  60. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2013;68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.

  61. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:685–8. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Mallott EK, Amato KR. Butyrate production pathway abundances are similar in human and nonhuman primate gut microbiomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msab279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gomez A, Petrzelkova K, Yeoman CJ, Vlckova K, Mrázek J, Koppova I, et al. Gut microbiome composition and metabolomic profiles of wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) reflect host ecology. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:2551–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Amato KR, Mallott EK, McDonald D, Dominy NJ, Goldberg T, Lambert JE, et al. Convergence of human and Old World monkey gut microbiomes demonstrates the importance of human ecology over phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2019;20:201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Li B, He G, Guo S, Hou R, Huang K, Zhang P, et al. Macaques in China: evolutionary dispersion and subsequent development. Am J Primatol. 2020;82:e23142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Abegg C. Macaque evolution and dispersal in insular south-east Asia. Biol J Lin Soc. 2002;75:555–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fooden J. Ecogeographic segregation of macaque species. Primates. 1982;23:574–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Majolo B, van Lavieren E, Maréchal L, MacLarnon A, Marvin G, Qarro M, et al. Out of Asia: the singular case of the Barbary macaque. In: Radhakrishna S, Huffman MA, Sinha A, editors., et al., The macaque connection: cooperation and conflict between humans and macaques. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 167–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3967-7_11. Cited 2022 Apr 25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  69. Reese AT, Phillips SR, Owens LA, Venable EM, Langergraber KE, Machanda ZP, et al. Age patterning in wild chimpanzee gut microbiota diversity reveals differences from humans in early life. Curr Biol. 2021;31:613–620.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Janiak MC, Montague MJ, Villamil CI, Stock MK, Trujillo AE, DePasquale AN, et al. Age and sex-associated variation in the multi-site microbiome of an entire social group of free-ranging rhesus macaques. Microbiome. 2021;9:68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Petrullo L, Baniel A, Jorgensen MJ, Sams S, Snyder-Mackler N, Lu A. The early life microbiota mediates maternal effects on offspring growth in a nonhuman primate. iScience. 2022;25:103948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Thomson P, Medina DA, Garrido D. Human milk oligosaccharides and infant gut bifidobacteria: molecular strategies for their utilization. Food Microbiol. 2018;75:37–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sheh A, Artim SC, Burns MA, Molina-Mora JA, Lee MA, Dzink-Fox J, et al. Common marmoset gut microbiome profiles in health and intestinal disease. Microbiology; 2020. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.08.27.268524.

  74. Aivelo T, Laakkonen J, Jernvall J. Population- and individual-level dynamics of the intestinal microbiota of a small primate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:3537–45. American Society for Microbiology.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen T, Long W, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao L, Hamaker BR. Fiber-utilizing capacity varies in Prevotella- versus Bacteroides-dominated gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Rincon MT, Lamed R, White BA. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:121–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Angelakis E, Bachar D, Yasir M, Musso D, Djossou F, Gaborit B, et al. Treponema species enrich the gut microbiota of traditional rural populations but are absent from urban individuals. New Microbes New Infect. 2019;27:14–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lugli GA, Alessandri G, Milani C, Mancabelli L, Ruiz L, Fontana F, et al. Evolutionary development and co-phylogeny of primate-associated bifidobacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:3375–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Modrackova N, Stovicek A, Burtscher J, Bolechova P, Killer J, Domig KJ, et al. The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15273. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Nunez N, Réot L, Menu E. Neonatal immune system ontogeny: the role of maternal microbiota and associated factors. How might the non-human primate model enlighten the path? Vaccines. 2021;9:584. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Aguirre M, Jonkers DMAE, Troost FJ, Roeselers G, Venema K. In vitro characterization of the impact of different substrates on metabolite production, energy extraction and composition of gut microbiota from lean and obese subjects. PLoS One. 2014;9:e113864. Public Library of Science.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Sawaswong V, Praianantathavorn K, Chanchaem P, Khamwut A, Kemthong T, Hamada Y, et al. Comparative analysis of oral-gut microbiota between captive and wild long-tailed macaque in Thailand. Sci Rep. 2021;11:14280. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Dantzer B, Newman AEM, Boonstra R, Palme R, Boutin S, Humphries MM, et al. Density triggers maternal hormones that increase adaptive offspring growth in a wild mammal. Science. 2013;340:1215–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sandi C, Haller J. Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:290–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bernardo J. Maternal effects in animal ecology. Am Zool. 1996;36:83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Class QA, Lichtenstein P, Långström N, D’Onofrio BM. Timing of prenatal maternal exposure to severe life events and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population study of 2.6 million pregnancies. Psychosom Med. 2011;73:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Davis EP, Sandman CA. The timing of prenatal exposure to maternal cortisol and psychosocial stress is associated with human infant cognitive development. Child Dev. 2010;81:131–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28:203–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Clarke G, Grenham S, Scully P, Fitzgerald P, Moloney RD, Shanahan F, et al. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:666–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Mayer EA, Savidge T, Shulman RJ. Brain–gut microbiome interactions and functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1500–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Barbara G, Stanghellini V, Brandi G, Cremon C, Di Nardo G, De Giorgio R, et al. Interactions between commensal bacteria and gut sensorimotor function in health and disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:2560–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:701–12. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sadoughi B, Schneider D, Daniel R, Schülke O, Ostner J. Aging gut microbiota of wild macaques are equally diverse, less stable but progressively personalized. Microbiology. 2022;(in press).

  94. Arboleya S, Watkins C, Stanton C, Ross RP. Gut bifidobacteria populations in human health and aging. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Kato K, Odamaki T, Mitsuyama E, Sugahara H, Xiao J, Osawa R. Age-related changes in the composition of gut Bifidobacterium species. Curr Microbiol. 2017;74:987–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14:576–90. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Watowich MM, Chiou KL, Montague MJ, Cayo Biobank Research Unit, Simons ND, Horvath JE, et al. Natural disaster and immunological aging in a nonhuman primate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2121663119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Zhu H, Zeng D, Wang Q, Wang N, Zeng B, Niu L, et al. Diarrhea-associated intestinal microbiota in captive sichuan golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). Microbes Environ. 2018;33:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Cui Y-F, Wang F-J, Yu L, Ye H-H, Yang G-B. Metagenomic comparison of the rectal microbiota between rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Zool Res. 2019;40:89–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Yao L, Li X, Zhou Z, Shi D, Li Z, Li S, et al. Age-based variations in the gut microbiome of the Shennongjia (Hubei) golden snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana hubeiensis). BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:e6667715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Hale VL, Tan CL, Niu K, Yang Y, Zhang Q, Knight R, et al. Gut microbiota in wild and captive Guizhou snub-nosed monkeys, Rhinopithecus brelichi. Am J Primatol. 2019;81:e22989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Chen Y, Liang J, Ouyang F, Chen X, Lu T, Jiang Z, et al. Persistence of gut microbiota dysbiosis and chronic systemic inflammation after cerebral infarction in cynomolgus monkeys. Front Neurol. 2019;10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.00661. Cited 2022 Apr 6.

  103. Amato KR, Metcalf JL, Song SJ, Hale VL, Clayton J, Ackermann G, et al. Using the gut microbiota as a novel tool for examining colobine primate GI health. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2016;7:225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Yang J, Li Y, Wen Z, Liu W, Meng L, Huang H. Oscillospira - a candidate for the next-generation probiotics. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1987783. Taylor & Francis.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Conley MN, Wong CP, Duyck KM, Hord N, Ho E, Sharpton TJ. Aging and serum MCP-1 are associated with gut microbiome composition in a murine model. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Hooper LV, Macpherson AJ. Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:159–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Chen Y, Zheng H, Zhang G, Chen F, Chen L, Yang Z. High Oscillospira abundance indicates constipation and low BMI in the Guangdong Gut Microbiome Project. Sci Rep. 2020;10:9364. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Turna J, Grosman Kaplan K, Anglin R, Patterson B, Soreni N, Bercik P, et al. The gut microbiome and inflammation in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients compared to age- and sex-matched controls: a pilot study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;142:337–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Li Y, Chen T, Li Y, Tang Y, Huang Z. Gut microbiota are associated with sex and age of host: evidence from semi-provisioned rhesus macaques in southwest Guangxi, China. Ecol Evol. 2021;11:8096–122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Boland K, Bedrani L, Turpin W, Kabakchiev B, Stempak J, Borowski K, et al. Persistent diarrhea in patients with Crohn’s disease after mucosal healing is associated with lower diversity of the intestinal microbiome and increased dysbiosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:296–304.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Walters WA, Xu Z, Knight R. Meta-analyses of human gut microbes associated with obesity and IBD. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:4223–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Lupp C, Robertson ML, Wickham ME, Sekirov I, Champion OL, Gaynor EC, et al. Host-mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2:119–29. Elsevier.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ascher S, Reinhardt C. The gut microbiota: an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48:564–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Rincel M, Olier M, Minni A, Monchaux de Oliveira C, Matime Y, Gaultier E, et al. Pharmacological restoration of gut barrier function in stressed neonates partially reverses long-term alterations associated with maternal separation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019;236:1583–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wiersema ML, Koester LR, Schmitz-Esser S, Koltes DA. Comparison of intestinal permeability, morphology, and ileal microbial communities of commercial hens housed in conventional cages and cage-free housing systems. Poult Sci. 2021;100:1178–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sciavilla P, Strati F, Di Paola M, Modesto M, Vitali F, Cavalieri D, et al. Gut microbiota profiles and characterization of cultivable fungal isolates in IBS patients. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:3277–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Radwan S, Gilfillan D, Eklund B, Radwan HM, Menofy NGE, Lee J, et al. A comparative study of the gut microbiome in Egyptian patients with Type I and Type II diabetes. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0238764. Public Library of Science.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Tong M, Li X, Wegener Parfrey L, Roth B, Ippoliti A, Wei B, et al. A modular organization of the human intestinal mucosal microbiota and its association with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Lopez-Legarrea P, Fuller NR, Martinez JA, Caterson ID, Zulet MA. The influence of Mediterranean, carbohydrate and high protein diets on gut microbiota composition in the treatment of obesity and associated inflammatory state. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23:360–8. HEC Press.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. An D, Oh SF, Olszak T, Neves JF, Avci FY, Erturk-Hasdemir D, et al. Sphingolipids from a symbiotic microbe regulate homeostasis of host intestinal natural killer T cells. Cell. 2014;156:123–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Brown EM, Ke X, Hitchcock D, Jeanfavre S, Avila-Pacheco J, Nakata T, et al. Bacteroides-derived sphingolipids are critical for maintaining intestinal homeostasis and symbiosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:668–680.e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Hla T, Dannenberg AJ. Sphingolipid signaling in metabolic disorders. Cell Metab. 2012;16:420–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Johnson EL, Heaver SL, Waters JL, Kim BI, Bretin A, Goodman AL, et al. Sphingolipids produced by gut bacteria enter host metabolic pathways impacting ceramide levels. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2471. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Lamichhane S, Sen P, Alves MA, Ribeiro HC, Raunioniemi P, Hyötyläinen T, et al. Linking gut microbiome and lipid metabolism: moving beyond associations. Metabolites. 2021;11:55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Yang C, Qu Y, Fujita Y, Ren Q, Ma M, Dong C, et al. Possible role of the gut microbiota–brain axis in the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine in a social defeat stress model. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:1–11. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Rivera-Chávez F, Zhang LF, Faber F, Lopez CA, Byndloss MX, Olsan EE, et al. Depletion of butyrate-producing Clostridia from the gut microbiota drives an aerobic luminal expansion of Salmonella. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:443–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Peng L, Li Z-R, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr. 2009;139:1619–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. White AE, Li YJ, Griskevicius V, Neuberg SL, Kenrick DT. Putting all your eggs in one basket: life-history strategies, bet hedging, and diversification. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:715–22. US: Sage Publications.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Khan AW, Meek E, Sowden LC, Colvin JR. Emendation of the genus Acetivibrio and description of Acetivibrio cellulosolvens sp. nov., a nonmotile cellulolytic mesophile†. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1984;34:419–22. Microbiology Society.

    Google Scholar 

  130. de Menezes AB, Lewis E, O’Donovan M, O’Neill BF, Clipson N, Doyle EM. Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;78:256–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Van Dyke MI, McCarthy AJ. Molecular biological detection and characterization of Clostridium populations in municipal landfill sites. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:2049–53. American Society for Microbiology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI. The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized Gnotobiotic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1:6ra14. American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Martínez I, Perdicaro DJ, Brown AW, Hammons S, Carden TJ, Carr TP, et al. Diet-induced alterations of host cholesterol metabolism are likely to affect the gut microbiota composition in hamsters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:516–24. American Society for Microbiology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Martínez-Cuesta MC, del Campo R, Garriga-García M, Peláez C, Requena T. Taxonomic characterization and short-chain fatty acids production of the obese microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcimb.2021.598093. Cited 2022 Apr 6.

  135. Kraatz M, Wallace RJ, Svensson L. Olsenella umbonata sp. nov., a microaerotolerant anaerobic lactic acid bacterium from the sheep rumen and pig jejunum, and emended descriptions of Olsenella, Olsenella uli and Olsenella profusa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:795–803. Microbiology Society.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Frost F, Storck LJ, Kacprowski T, Gärtner S, Rühlemann M, Bang C, et al. A structured weight loss program increases gut microbiota phylogenetic diversity and reduces levels of Collinsella in obese type 2 diabetics: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219489. Public Library of Science.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Sharma AK, Petrzelkova K, Pafco B, Jost Robinson CA, Fuh T, Wilson BA, et al. Traditional human populations and nonhuman primates show parallel gut microbiome adaptations to analogous ecological conditions. mSystems. 2020;5:e00815–20. American Society for Microbiology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Cabana F, Clayton JB, Nekaris KAI, Wirdateti W, Knights D, Seedorf H. Nutrient-based diet modifications impact on the gut microbiome of the Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus). Sci Rep. 2019;9:4078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Eadala P, Matthews SB, Waud JP, Green JT, Campbell AK. Association of lactose sensitivity with inflammatory bowel disease–demonstrated by analysis of genetic polymorphism, breath gases and symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:735–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Cesselin B, Henry C, Gruss A, Gloux K, Gaudu P. Mechanisms of acetoin toxicity and adaptive responses in an acetoin-producing species, Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87. American Society for Microbiology (ASM). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8612267/. Cited 2023 Mar 29.

  141. Rudolph K, Schneider D, Fichtel C, Daniel R, Heistermann M, Kappeler PM. Drivers of gut microbiome variation within and between groups of a wild Malagasy primate. Microbiome. 2022;10:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Stothart MR, Bobbie CB, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Boonstra R, Palme R, Mykytczuk NCS, et al. Stress and the microbiome: linking glucocorticoids to bacterial community dynamics in wild red squirrels. Biol Lett. 2016;12:20150875.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Petrullo L, Ren T, Wu M, Boonstra R, Palme R, Boutin S, et al. Glucocorticoids coordinate changes in gut microbiome composition in wild North American red squirrels. Sci Rep. 2022;12:2605. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. Li A, Yang Y, Qin S, Lv S, Jin T, Li K, et al. Microbiome analysis reveals gut microbiota alteration of early-weaned Yimeng black goats with the effect of milk replacer and age. Microb Cell Fact. 2021;20:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Fukuda S, Toh H, Hase K, Oshima K, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 2011;469:543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Dahl C, Stanislawski M, Iszatt N, Mandal S, Lozupone C, Clemente JC, et al. Gut microbiome of mothers delivering prematurely shows reduced diversity and lower relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184336. Public Library of Science.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Koropatkin NM, Cameron EA, Martens EC. How glycan metabolism shapes the human gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:323–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Jones RB, Alderete TL, Kim JS, Millstein J, Gilliland FD, Goran MI. High intake of dietary fructose in overweight/obese teenagers associated with depletion of Eubacterium and Streptococcus in gut microbiome. Gut Microbes. 2019;10:712–9. Taylor & Francis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Bonier F, Romero LM, Moore IT. Glucocorticoids and “stress” are not synonymous. Integr Org Biol. 2019;1:obz017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–31. Nature Publishing Group.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation (DNP) which authorized our research. We thank J. Prabnasuk, K. Nitaya, T. Wonsnak, M. Pongjantarasatien, C. Intuwarn and K. Kreetiyutanont, M. Kumsuk, A. Ngiensanoi, W. Saenphala, A. Tadklang, from Phu Khieo Wildlife Sanctuary who supported our project and permitted the research at the sanctuary. We are very grateful to all the assistants and students that helped in the field: S. Jumrudwong, W. Nueorngshiyos, N. Juntuch, A. Boonsopin, J. Wanart, R. Intalo, T. Kilawit, N. Pongangan, B. Klaewklar, N. Bualeng, A. Ebenau, P. Saisawatdikul, K. Srithorn, K. Phumkhosan, M. Swagemakers, and T. Wisate. We thank A. Heistermann and F. Nummert for help in the hormone lab. Finally, we thank the members of the research unit “Sociality and Health in Primates” (DFG FOR 2136) for stimulating discussions, and the University of Göttingen for providing financial support at the publication stage.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The project was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (German Research Foundation SCHU 1554/6-1) as part of the DFG Research Group “Sociality and Health in Primates” (DFG-FOR 2136). Further support was provided by the University of Göttingen, Germany and the German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, SA, RD, JO, OS; data curation, SA and DS; materials, SS; formal analysis, investigation, and visualization, SA and DS; methodology, all authors; writing—original draft, SA, OS; writing—review and editing, all authors; funding acquisition, RD, OS, and JO; supervision, OS, DS, RD, and JO. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Anzà.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was based on non-invasive collection of fecal samples, did not involve experimental work, and adhered to the ASAB/ABS Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research (https://www.asab.org/ethics). It has been approved by the Thai National Research Council and the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Thailand (permits 0002.3/2647 April 2nd 2009, 0002/17 January 2nd 2013, 0002/2424 April 23th 2014, 0002/470 January 26th 2016, 0002/4139 June 9th 2017, 0002/2747 May 4th 2018, 0402/2798 October 4th 2019).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Amplification of 16S rRNA genes and sequencing: full procedure. Supplementary Table 1. Full models 1a-1c explaining the offspring’s gut bacteria alpha diversity (from richness estimators). Significant P values of explanatory variables are in bold. R2 indicates the conditional coefficient of determination. All covariates are logn-transformed and then z-transformed (mean = 0, SD = 1) to meet model requirements and increase model interpretability. (1) coded with “female” as the reference category, (2) coded with “infant” as the reference category, (3) coded with “lean” as the reference category, (4) coded with the group “MOT” as the reference category. Supplementary Table 2. Full model 1d-1e explaining the offspring’s gut bacteria alpha diversity (from richness-evenness estimators). Significant P values of explanatory variables are in bold. R2 indicates the conditional coefficient of determination. All covariates are logn-transformed and then z-transformed (mean = 0, SD = 1) to meet model requirements and increase model interpretability. (1) coded with “female” as the reference category, (2) coded with “infant” as the reference category, (3) coded with “lean” as the reference category, (4) coded with the group “MOT” as the reference category. Supplementary Table 3. Reduced models 1a-1c explaining the offspring’s gut bacteria alpha diversity (from richness estimators). Significant P values of explanatory variables are in bold. The model was tested via model comparison with null models: Model 1a: χ2 = 72.85, df = 11, p < 0.001; Model 1b: χ2 = 91.98, df = 11, p < 0.001; Model 1c: χ2 = 66.38, df = 11, p < 0.001. R2 indicates conditional coefficient of determination. All covariates are logn-transformed and then z-transformed (mean = 0, SD = 1) to meet model requirements and increase model interpretability. (1) coded with “female” as the reference category, (2) coded with “infant” as the reference category, (3) coded with “lean” as the reference category, (4) coded with the group “MOT” as the reference category. Supplementary Table 4. Reduced model 1d and 1e explaining the offspring’s gut bacteria alpha diversity (from richness-evenness estimators). Significant P values of explanatory variables are in bold. The model was tested via model comparison with null models: Model 1d: χ2 = 29.26, df = 15, p = 0.015; Model 1e: χ2 = 20.08, df = 11, p = 0.044. R2 indicates the conditional coefficient of determination. All covariates represent average values log-transformed and then z-transformed. All covariates are logn-transformed and then z-transformed (mean = 0, SD = 1) to meet model requirements and increase model interpretability. (1) coded with “female” as the reference category, (2) coded with “infant” as the reference category, (3) coded with “lean” as the reference category, (4) coded with the group “MOT” as the reference category. Supplementary Table 5. Full linear models explaining the Firmicutes to Bacteroidota ratio of offspring’s gut bacteria during the lean (Full-Model L) and the rich season (Full-Model R). (1) indicates that the predictor has been logn-transformed and then z-transformed with mean = 0 and SD = 1 to meet model requirements and to increase model interpretability; (2) indicates that the predictor has been z-transformed with mean = 0 and SD = 1; (3) coded with the group “MOT” as the reference category; (3) coded with “female” as the reference category. Supplementary Table 6. Effect of Early-preGC in interaction with age on gut bacterial composition during the rich season. Infants are excluded from the analyses. UN = unclassified at the genus level. Supplementary Figure 1. Predicted functional pathways significantly affected by the prenatal maternal GCs and offspring age (Late-PreGC*Age). KOs are grouped at level 3 of KEGG database. Only significantly affected pathways are plotted (BH adjusted p-values). Colored bars indicate the effect of an increase in 1SD of Late-preGC (SD = 67.0 ng/g) estimated at the mean value of age (mean = 4.7 years), and at the mean value of all the other predictors. Red and black lines indicate the effect estimated at the mean plus1SD (red = 7.1 years) and at the mean minus1SD (black = 2.3) of age. When the bar is not plotted, the effect of the same increase in maternal GCs at the mean age is 0. Taxa showing the black head (estimates at 2.3 years) further from 0 than the red head (estimates at 7.1 years) show an effect that is reduced with age. Supplementary Figure 2. Predicted functional pathways significantly affected by the postnatal maternal GCs and offspring age (PostGC*Age). KOs are grouped at level 3 of KEGG database. Only significantly affected pathways are plotted (BH adjusted p-values). Colored bars indicate the effect of an increase in 1SD of PostGC (SD = 52.7 ng/g) estimated at the mean value of age (mean = 4.7 years), and at the mean value of all the other predictors. Red and black lines indicate the effect estimated at the mean plus1SD (red = 7.1 years) and at the mean minus1SD (black = 2.3) of age. When the bar is not plotted, the effect of the same increase in maternal GCs at the mean age is 0. Taxa showing the black head (estimates at 2.3 years) further from 0 than the red head (estimates at 7.1 years) show an effect that is reduced with age. Supplementary Figure 3. Predicted functional pathways significantly affected by the offspring GCs and offspring age (OffspringGC*Age). KOs are grouped at level 3 of KEGG database. Only significantly affected pathways are plotted (BH adjusted p-values). Colored bars indicate the effect of an increase in 1SD of OffspringGC (SD = 130.1 ng/g) estimated at the mean value of age (mean = 4.7 years), and at the mean value of all the other predictors. Red and black lines indicate the effect estimated at the mean plus1SD (red = 7.1 years) and at the mean minus1SD (black = 2.3) of age. When the bar is not plotted, the effect of the same increase in maternal GCs at the mean age is 0. Taxa showing the black head (estimates at 2.3 years) further from 0 than the red head (estimates at 7.1 years) show an effect that is reduced with age.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anzà, S., Schneider, D., Daniel, R. et al. The long-term gut bacterial signature of a wild primate is associated with a timing effect of pre- and postnatal maternal glucocorticoid levels. Microbiome 11, 165 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01596-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-023-01596-w

Keywords