Skip to main content

Dissolved storage glycans shaped the community composition of abundant bacterioplankton clades during a North Sea spring phytoplankton bloom



Blooms of marine microalgae play a pivotal role in global carbon cycling. Such blooms entail successive blooms of specialized clades of planktonic bacteria that collectively remineralize gigatons of algal biomass on a global scale. This biomass is largely composed of distinct polysaccharides, and the microbial decomposition of these polysaccharides is therefore a process of prime importance.


In 2020, we sampled a complete biphasic spring bloom in the German Bight over a 90-day period. Bacterioplankton metagenomes from 30 time points allowed reconstruction of 251 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Corresponding metatranscriptomes highlighted 50 particularly active MAGs of the most abundant clades, including many polysaccharide degraders. Saccharide measurements together with bacterial polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) expression data identified β-glucans (diatom laminarin) and α-glucans as the most prominent and actively metabolized dissolved polysaccharide substrates. Both substrates were consumed throughout the bloom, with α-glucan PUL expression peaking at the beginning of the second bloom phase shortly after a peak in flagellate and the nadir in bacterial total cell counts.


We show that the amounts and composition of dissolved polysaccharides, in particular abundant storage polysaccharides, have a pronounced influence on the composition of abundant bacterioplankton members during phytoplankton blooms, some of which compete for similar polysaccharide niches. We hypothesize that besides the release of algal glycans, also recycling of bacterial glycans as a result of increased bacterial cell mortality can have a significant influence on bacterioplankton composition during phytoplankton blooms.

Video Abstract


The carbon cycle is the largest biogeochemical cycle. Every year, more than 100 Gt of carbon are fixed by photosynthesis in about equal amounts by terrestrial plants and marine algae [23]. Marine planktonic microalgae (phytoplankton) fix about 45–50 Gt annually [21], of which diatoms alone might fix up to 20 Gt [53]. This carbon fixation climaxes during phytoplankton blooms, which can occur in the presence of sufficient solar irradiance and inorganic nutrients. Phytoplankton blooms can reach massive scales that are only visible in entirety by satellite, but are also usually rather short-lived. Bloom termination is often a result of compounding effects, such as self-shading, nutrient exhaustion, viral infections, parasitism by marine fungi, oomycetes and algicidal bacteria, and grazing by protists (e.g., flagellates, ciliates) and invertebrate metazoans (e.g., copepods) [13, 51, 80]. During blooms, copious amounts of organic material are released to the surrounding seawater, either via algal exudation or cell death. This fuels the pools of marine dissolved and particulate organic matter (DOM, POM), a substantial portion of which is rapidly remineralized by marine heterotrophic bacteria in surface waters.

Bloom-associated bacteria have co-evolved with photosynthetic microalgae since the latter emerged during the Precambrian Proterozoic period roughly two billion years ago [69], including the more recent diatoms that emerged during the Permian–Triassic extinction event about 250 million years ago [8]. These bacteria constitute tight-knit communities that collectively decompose algal biomass. Many partaking species are outright specialists that target only specific classes of algal biomass, a strategy which minimizes competition and concomitantly maximizes efficiency (resource partitioning) [22].

Polysaccharides (glycans) represent a major class of algal biomass, used for instance as intracellular energy storage or found in cell matrices and cell walls. Total contents depend on microalgal species and physiological state and can reach up to about 75% of the dry weight [59]. In addition, algae exudate glycans into the surrounding seawater, some of which assemble into transparent exopolymer particles (TEP). Many algal polysaccharides are anionic, often by sulfation, and have no counterparts in terrestrial plants. Simple algal polysaccharides consist of a sole monosaccharide and few linkage types, for example, laminarin, a helical polysaccharide composed of glucose monomers with a β-1,3-linked backbone and occasional β-1,6-linked branches. Laminarin serves as storage of photoassimilated glucose in diatoms and therefore is one of the most abundant polysaccharides on Earth [7]. Other algal polysaccharides are structurally more complex and involve numerous monosaccharides, linkage types, and secondary modifications. Knowledge on respective structures is sparse, in particular for planktonic microalgae (for diatoms, see [29]).

Polysaccharide decomposition requires various specifically adapted carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) belonging to different glycoside hydrolase (GH), polysaccharide lyase (PL), and carbohydrate esterase (CE) families [12]. In polysaccharide-degrading bacteria, genes for decomposition and uptake of dedicated polysaccharides are usually organized in operon-like polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs) that allow inferences about the chemical nature of the target polysaccharide substrate. PUL genes can account for a considerable proportion of genes in specialized bacterial clades (e.g., [44]). This constitutes a considerable genetic investment, which entails that resource partitioning is particularly pronounced among polysaccharide-degrading bacteria.

We have analyzed the response of planktonic bacteria (bacterioplankton) to spring phytoplankton blooms at Helgoland Roads in the German Bight of the North Sea since 2009 [25, 48, 71, 72]. Suitable conditions for these mostly diatom-dominated blooms usually occur from mid-March to the beginning of April. Initially, inorganic nutrients are usually aplenty and predator abundances are low, which allows algae and bacteria to grow with few restrictions. This largely bottom-up controlled phase is often characterized by swift successions of distinct algae and bacterioplankton taxa [72]. The latter usually represent about > 99% of the total bacteria in the water column [33]. As blooms progress, parasites and predators start to catch up. Top-down pressure from infections and grazing increases, and, together with nutrient depletion, ultimately, these blooms are terminated after a few weeks [3639, 64].

Phytoplankton blooms are highly dynamic events. Substantial changes in both algae and bacterioplankton community composition can happen within a day or two. Frequent sampling is thus required in order to disentangle what drives bacterioplankton dynamics. Highly resolved bacterioplankton community composition analysis is also required, since some clades comprise species with considerable functional diversity, whereby the genus Polaribacter is a prime example [6]. This diversity is usually not well addressed with partial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in combination with short-read-based metagenomics — methods that were common until recently. Finally, high time-resolution deep expression analysis is a precondition to capture key metabolic processes of distinct clades over a bloom’s progression.

Here, we present a study of the 2020 spring phytoplankton bloom at Helgoland Roads. We sampled the complete spring bloom period over 90 days and sequenced bacterioplankton metagenomes and transcriptomes at 30 dates. These were complemented by algae and bacteria diversity and abundance data, copepod and flagellate abundance data, physicochemical data and measurements of mono- and polysaccharide concentrations. These data allowed us to investigate (i) which dissolved polysaccharides are available to and are preferentially consumed by abundant, active bacterioplankton clades, (ii) how the availability and consumption of polysaccharides changed over time, and (iii) whether these processes might be influenced by changes in algae composition and algae and flagellate abundances.


The 2020 Helgoland spring phytoplankton bloom was biphasic

The 2020 spring phytoplankton bloom at Helgoland Roads started around March 24 and lasted until the end of May. It consisted of two distinct phases with an inflection point around April 23 (Fig. 1). The first bloom phase started with a sevenfold increase in chlorophyll a from ~ 1 to ~ 7 µg per L within just 2 days and went through a total of three maxima. The combined algal biovolume during this phase was dominated by the large centric diatom species Ditylum brightwellii (Fig. 1A), with minor contributions from Phaeocystis sp. (Haptophyta, class Prymnesiophyceae), unspecified Dinophyceae, and Cerataulina pelagica, Chaetoceros sp., Guinardia delicatula, and Thalassiosira rotula centric diatoms (Fig. 1B). D. brightwellii numbers declined towards the end of the first phase with chlorophyll a declining to ~ 2 µg per L, passing into the second phase. This phase was characterized by rapid proliferation of Chaetoceros sp. and in particular large C. pelagica centric diatoms, which resulted in an initial chlorophyll a increase from below 2 to above 9 µg per L within 5 days. During the second phase, also Phaeocystis sp. and Dinophyceae numbers started to increase, but did not reach notable proportions of the total algal biovolume (Additional file 2). At the same time, the inorganic nutrients silicate, phosphate, ammonium, and nitrate became scarce (Fig. S1 C, D in Additional file 1; Additional file 2), and the bloom went into decline from about mid-May on. During this terminal phase, Dinophyceae numbers decreased less rapidly than diatom numbers, probably because the former do not depend on the silicate which the latter need for frustule formation. At the end of May, the bloom was over, and algal cell numbers were almost down to pre-bloom levels.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Major phases of the spring phytoplankton bloom at Helgoland Roads during March to May 2020. A Biovolumes of abundant phytoplankton taxa and chlorophyll a concentrations as measured by HPLC (black line). B Biovolumes of less abundant algal taxa. C DAPI-based bacterial total cell counts (TCC; black line), flagellate counts (red line), and counts of copepods (excluding Copepoda nauplii; green line). Estimated phytoplankton biovolumes are plotted as a gray area in the background. D Abundances of the 18 most prominent bacterial clades as assessed by metagenomic 16S rRNA gene frequencies. The sum of bacteroidetal, alpha-, and gammaproteobacterial clades among these top 18 clades is depicted by lines. Bacterial total cell counts are represented as gray area in the background

During the first bloom phase, flagellate numbers remained low at an almost constant 2 to 3 × 106 per L, indicating substantial grazing pressure from higher trophic levels (Fig. 1C). Microscopic observations confirmed a pronounced copepod bloom during the second half of this phase that was dominated by Paracalanus species (Additional file 3). The copepod bloom started around April 1, and the highest numbers were counted on April 15 using an about weekly counting interval (Fig. 1C). The increase in copepod numbers was accompanied by a pronounced increase in bacterioplankton with total cell counts (TCC) from around 0.5 to 1.7 × 106 per mL (Fig. 1C). Afterwards, both algal biomass and copepod numbers subsided, while flagellate numbers started to increase, and bacterial TCC to drop to about 106 per mL at the bloom’s inflection point (Fig. 1C). The second bloom phase was characterized by much higher overall algae numbers. At first, bacterioplankton continued to decrease down to about 0.3 × 106 per mL and then increased again to finally reach about 1.8 × 106 per mL on May 26. Likewise, flagellate abundances increased throughout most of the second bloom phase until a decrease towards the bloom’s end, while copepod numbers increased only little throughout the second bloom phase (Fig. 1C).

The second bloom phase was triggered by an influx of nutrient-rich coastal water

Helgoland is located on the continental shelf with water depths up to ~ 56 m. The water body at the shallower (6 to 10 m depth) long-term ecological research (LTER) site ‘Kabeltonne’ at Helgoland Roads (54° 11.3′ N, 7° 54.0′ E) is subject to tidal range and usually well-mixed [78]. There are competing influences from oceanic and coastal water masses that can disturb the system to varying extents. Still, the water regime can be relatively stable for longer periods of time.

The dominating wind directions in the German Bight are northwest and southwest. Due to the Coriolis pseudo force, these winds suppress spreading of coastal waters from the south offshore. However, when northeasterly to easterly winds prevail for some days, coastal water masses and plumes from the Elbe and Weser river estuaries (~ 50 km distance) can reach Helgoland. These waters are usually characterized by lower salinities and higher concentrations of inorganic nutrients, resulting in a drop of salinity and in an increase of nutrients (e.g., [15, 67]). In particular, nitrate is a suitable proxy for riverine inputs in the southern North Sea due to extensive agriculture in the North German Plain.

On April 1/2 and at the onset of the second phase on April 22/23, inorganic ammonium and phosphate concentrations spiked almost threefold to about 5.1–6.8 µM and 1.6–1.8 µM, respectively. Both spikes were accompanied by increases in silicate concentrations, and drops in salinities from about 33.8 to 31.6 and 32.1 to 30.4, respectively (Fig. S1 A, C in Additional file 1), indicating incursions of nutrient-rich coastal waters. The second influx event was accompanied by a spike in nitrate concentration of 33.8 µM at April 21, representing the highest nitrate concentration measured during the sampling campaign (Fig. S1C in Additional file 1). Wind directional data supported an influx of coastal waters, since moderate northeasterly to easterly winds dominated from April 19 to 24 (Fig. S2 in Additional file 1, Additional file 4). The influx of fresh nutrients at the bloom’s inflection point together with continuously increasing water temperatures likely set the stage for the second phase of the bloom to take place. At the same time, species abundances around the bloom's inflection point were likely influenced by coastal water intrusions.

Metagenome 16S rRNA gene frequencies revealed that few flavobacterial clades dominated the second bloom phase

Unassembled metagenome reads contained 325,737 near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences (average: 1269 bp) that were used for diversity analyses (Fig. 1D, Additional files 5, 6). Among Alphaproteobacteria, SAR11 Ia clade sequences dominated during the pre- and first bloom phases, reaching up to 22.1% on March 10 and 21.4% on April 20. Likewise, SAR11 clade II sequences were confined to the pre- and first bloom phases and peaked with 5.1% also on March 10. In contrast, Amylibacter sequences were detected during all bloom phases reaching up to 16.2% on March 26 and 13.3% on May 7 (9 PM sample). A similar pattern was found for Planktomarina with a maximum of ~ 11% on April 30. Sulfitobacter sequences were associated with the second and terminal bloom phases and reached up to ~ 8%, while SAR116 sequences never exceeded ~ 5% at any time point.

Sequences of abundant Bacteroidota affiliated with well-known bloom-associated Flavobacteriia clades at Helgoland, such as Aurantivirga [48], Cd. Prosiliicoccus [25], and Polaribacter [6]. Flavobacterial clades ramped up at the bloom’s inflection point and dominated in the second bloom phase, topping out at 56% on May 4. Flavobacteriia relative numbers declined after May 8 during the bloom’s terminal phase. The most abundant flavobacterial clade, Aurantivirga, peaked with 19% of the bacterial relative abundance on March 26 during the first phase and with ~ 23% on May 5 during the second phase. In contrast, Polaribacter were only detected in the second bloom phase, peaking with 21.7% relative abundances on May 5. Flavicella members were present during the second and terminal bloom phases and reached up to 6.5% on May 6. The NS4, NS5, NS2b, NS3a, and NS9 clades [2] occurred during the pre- and first bloom phases. Sequences of other Bacteroidota clades such as Formosa, Fluviicola, Marinoscillum, Aquibacter, and uncultured Cryomorphaceae were found during all bloom phases with proportions below 5%.

The most prominent Gammaproteobacteria were members of the SAR92 clade, in particular during the terminal bloom phase with up to ~ 12% relative abundance on May 20. In contrast, SAR86 sequences were present mostly during the pre- and second bloom phases and during the terminal phase after May 8. Members of the OM182 clade followed a similar pattern, but relative abundances never exceeded ~ 3%. Methylophilaceae (OM43 clade, reclassified from Beta- to Gammaproteobacteria in GTDB [58]) were also restricted to the pre- and first bloom phases. Glaciecola sequences were constricted to the second bloom phase with a maximum of ~ 8% on May 4. Pseudoalteromonas 16S rRNA gene sequences were found in the first bloom phase with a maximum of ~ 5% on April 6. Sequences of Luminiphilus OM60 (NOR5 clade) were found in all bloom phases but with low frequencies. In contrast, Cd. Thioglobus (SUP05 clade) sequences were confined to the pre-bloom phase before March 26.

Sequences of actinobacterial Cd. Actinomarina were restricted to the pre- and first bloom phases with a maximum of ~ 5% relative abundance on March 10. Marine group II Archaea sequences were low in abundance throughout the bloom, with highest relative abundances of ~ 11% during the pre-bloom phase on March 26.

Abundant clades were confirmed by CARD-FISH analyses

Microscopic cell counting with fluorescently labeled CARD-FISH (catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization) probes (Additional file 7) confirmed Aurantivirga (probe AUR452) and Polaribacter (probe POL740) as the dominant clades within the Bacteroidota, with maximum relative abundances of 18.3% (112,000 cells/mL) and 17.7% (100,000 cells/mL) on May 8 and 4, respectively (Fig. 2A). Overall abundances of both clades were highest during the second bloom phase, but seldom exceeded 5% during other phases. This was the case when Aurantivirga peaked to slightly above 5% relative abundance on March 26/27 (~ 27,000 cells/mL). This peak coincided with the initial D. brightwellii peak, suggesting a rapid response of Aurantivirga to the proliferation of this diatom. Cd. Abditibacter ([28], probe Vis6-814), on the other hand, had low overall abundances, ranging from 0.1 to 3.4% throughout the bloom. Towards the end of the second phase into the bloom’s terminal decline, relative abundances of dominating Bacteroidota declined, whereas those of the gammaproteobacterial SAR92 clade (probe SAR92-627) gradually increased to a maximum of 10.7% (105,000 cells/mL) on May 19 (Fig. 2B). Members of the gammaproteobacterial SAR86 clade (probe SAR86-1245) exhibited higher relative abundances during the first than the second bloom phase, but values never exceeded 8%. The gammaproteobacterial OM182 clade (probe OM182-707) showed an almost uniform distribution throughout the bloom, with values mostly ranging below 4.5%. Both SAR86 and OM182 relative abundances tanked below 1% on May 4 and recovered afterwards. Such a minimum was not observed for the SAR92.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Upper graphs: Abundance of various prominent clades as assessed by CARD-FISH (turquoise areas) and by metagenomic 16S rRNA gene frequencies (lines). Lower graphs: Abundances as assessed by CARD-FISH (turquoise areas) and expression patterns of corresponding metagenome-assembled genomes as assessed by metatranscriptomics (lines) expressed as transcripts per million (TPM). A Bacteroidota: Aurantivirga (probe AUR452), Polaribacter (probe POL740) and Cd. Abditibacter (probe Vis6-814). B Gammaproteobacteria: SAR86 clade (probe SAR86-1245), SAR92 clade (probe SAR92-627), and OM182 clade (probe OM182-707). C Alphaproteobacteria: SAR11 clade (probe SAR11-mix) and RCA clade Planktomarina and Amylibacter (probe Ros537)

Corroborating metagenome 16S rRNA gene frequencies, SAR11 (probe SAR11-mix) dominated during the pre-bloom and both major bloom phases with relative abundances ranging from 18.6% (127,000 cells/mL) on March 2 to 26.6% (286,000 cells/mL) on April 27 (Fig. 2C). Like the gammaproteobacterial SAR86 and OM182 clades, SAR11 also suddenly dropped to 2.1% relative abundance on May 4 with a slow recovery afterwards that lasted throughout the bloom’s terminal phase. Members of the abundant Roseobacter clade (probe Ros537) were more uniformly distributed, with peaks in relative abundance of around ~ 15% (~ 83,000 cells/mL) on March 26/27 (initial D. brightwellii peak) during the first bloom phase, and on May 8 during the second bloom phase. Abundant members comprised Amylibacter and Planktomarina, with Amylibacter being abundant throughout the bloom, and Planktomarina thriving during the second bloom phase (Fig. 2C).

High-quality representative MAGs could be obtained for most abundant clades

Automatic binning of all 30 individual metagenomes yielded 10,950 initial bins and 11,071 bins after manual refinement (Additional file 8, Fig. S3A in Additional file 1). Of these, 1648 had > 70% completeness and < 5% contamination estimates (Fig. S3B in Additional file 1). Dereplication at 0.95 ANI reduced this set to 251 representative, non-redundant MAGs, 165 of which had > 90% completeness, and < 5% contamination estimates. According to MIMAG standards [10], 158 MAGs were classified as high quality. A total of 140 MAGs consisted of ≤ 10 contigs, and 76 even had a no predicted contamination, substantiating the dataset’s high quality (Fig. S3C in Additional file 1).

GTDB taxonomic affiliation revealed that 97.2% of the MAGs belonged to Bacteria and 2.8% to Archaea. On phylum level, Proteobacteria (48.6%) dominated, followed by Bacteroidota (36.3%). The remaining bacterial MAGs belonged to Actinobacteriota, Verrucomicrobiota, Planctomycetota, Marinisomatota, Myxococcota, and Campylobacterota (Additional file 9). These representative MAGs correlated well with the overall abundant clades detected by CARD-FISH as well as 16S rRNA gene frequencies.

Few particularly active MAGs dominated overall expression

Mapping of reads from all 30 transcriptomes onto the complete metagenome dataset recruited 71.5% of the transcripts, and onto the 251 representative MAGs 41.4% of the transcripts. During the pre-bloom, gammaproteobacterial and alphaproteobacterial MAGs dominated with 34.5% (349,824) and 32.1% (320,829) of the total transcripts per million (TTPM), respectively (Fig. S4 in Additional file 1). At the onset of the first bloom phase, relative activities of Bacteroidia and Poseidonia A (Thermoplasmatota) MAGs increased notably and peaked on March 26 during the first D. brightwellii peak with 36.3% (363,562) and 20.4% (203,861) of the TTPM, respectively. During the second bloom phase after April 27, relative activities of alphaproteobacterial MAGs decreased and reached a minimum of 18.0% (179,681) of the TTPM on May 13. Simultaneously, relative activities of Bacteroidia MAGs increased during the second bloom phase and even dominated a larger part of this phase with a maximum of 53.2% (532,164) of the TTPM on May 8 (Fig. S4 in Additional file 1; Additional file 10). The terminal phase lastly was characterized by a decrease in Bacteroidota and an increase in Gammaproteobacteria transcripts. As the bulk of metatranscriptome reads mapped to a small number of particularly active MAGs, we confined our analysis to the 50 topmost expressed MAGs representing 30.3% of all transcripts (Fig. 3; Fig. S5 in Additional file 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenomic tree of the top 47 expressed bacterial MAGs (created with anvi-gen-phylogenomic-tree of anvi’o v7) and their denominations along with their expression profiles. The expression is represented as heatmap of transcripts per million (TPM) along all sampling points from March to May 2020 (inside to outside). Genus-level clade affiliations are plotted at the outside. The outermost dots indicate the presence of predicted PULs (blue) and variant 1 laminarin PULs (red), respectively. Tree annotations were done with iTOL v6. Corresponding archaeal MAGs are depicted in Fig. S5 (Additional file 1)


Ninety-one (36%) of the 251 representative MAGs affiliated with Bacteroidota, with 15 ranging among the 50 topmost expressed MAGs. Aurantivirga was the most active clade, with four MAGs accounting for up to 24.1% (241,055) of the TTPM. The most active of these MAGs (AI_MB94_1) exhibited highest expression during the second bloom phase after a steep rise from 1.0% (9958) of the TTPM on April 29 to 13.7% (136,921) of the TTPM on May 8. The second-most active Aurantivirga MAG (C_MB100) exhibited maximum expression of 7.3% (72,698) of the TTPM on March 26 during the D. brightwellii peak, indicating rapid response to proliferation of this diatom. Correlation with CARD-FISH data was high (R = 0.83; p = 1.03 E-7), confirming Aurantivirga as prominent bloom-associated clade (Fig. 2A).

The second-most expressed Bacteroidota clade was represented by two Cd. Prosiliicoccus MAGs. Their combined maximum expression accounted for up to 9.5% (95,261) of the TTPM, with one MAG (AB_MB380) alone accounting for 7.5% (74,669). Expression of both MAGs was negligible during the pre- and first bloom phases, but started to increase after April 29 and for AB_MB380 peaked on May 6 during the second bloom phase (Fig. 3). A similar pattern was observed for one of two notably expressed Polaribacter MAGs (P_MB288), with a peak on May 4 with 6.0% (60,030) of the TTPM. Information on other lower expressed Bacteroidota MAGs is included in Additional file 1.

Further lower expressed Bacteroidota MAGs included two Cd. Abditibacter MAGs and four MAGs from different NS clades. The Cd. Abditibacter MAGs exhibited almost uniform low expression throughout March to May. In contrast, MAGs affiliating with NS5 and NS3a marine groups exhibited higher expression during the first bloom phase, while MAGs affiliating with the NS4 and NS2b marine groups had higher expression before April 27 (first phase) and after May 12 (terminal phase) (Fig. 3).


Eighteen out of 78 representative gammaproteobacterial MAGs were part of the 50 topmost expressed MAGs. A single Glaciecola MAG (Y_MB157) exhibited a pronounced peak in abundance and expression on May 4, making it the topmost expressed gammaproteobacterial clade with 15.4% (154,454) of the TTPM and 7.6% of relative 16S rRNA gene abundance. However, its peak expression lasted for only about a day, dropped to 2.2% afterwards, and subsequently, activity of Glaciecola Y_MB157 almost vanished with a mere 30 TPM left on May 20.

Six MAGs affiliating with SAR92 exhibited high expression in the second bloom phase except MAG B_MB221, which was notably expressed throughout the entire bloom. The five other SAR92 MAGs combined contributed up to 9.3% (93,093) of the TTPM, suggesting a relevance akin to that of abundant Bacteroidota clades. Two Luminiphilus (OM60/NOR5 clade) MAGs showed only little expression during the second bloom phase, with a notable increase on the last sampling date of the terminal phase (Fig. 3).

In contrast, SAR86 clade MAGs showed high expression mostly during the first bloom phase, during which all four respective MAGs combined accounted for 4.0% (39,694) to 11.5% (115,285) of the TTPM. Expression decreased considerably after April 29, reaching a minimum of only 0.8% (7,622) of the TTPM on May 4. Similar to SAR92, expression of SAR86 increased again after May 8. Also, MAGs affiliating with the OM43 clade exhibited a similar overall activity pattern.


The 50 topmost expressed MAGs included ten alphaproteobacterial MAGs, with highest expression of three Pelagibacter (SAR11 clade) MAGs (AI_MB285, O_MB120, AB_MB223). Their collective expression ranged from 4.2% (42,104) to 16.4% (164,238) of the TTPM during the pre- and first bloom phases. Lower expression was observed for the related SAR116 clade, whose expression peaked during the first bloom phase (Fig. 3). An Amylibacter MAG (Y_MB67_1) showed high expression throughout the bloom with expression ranging from 1.7% (16,832) to 12.9% (128,976) of the TTPM. In contrast, the more active of two Planktomarina MAGs (P_MB52_1) was particularly active during the second bloom phase, with maximum expression of 10.9% (108,806) of the TTMP on April 29.

Other clades

Further highly expressed clades affiliated with Actinobacteriota (genera: Actinomarina, Ilumatobacter, Cd. Nanopelagicales) and Verrucomicrobiota (BACL24 clade). The top 50 expressed MAGs also contained three archaeal MAGs that all belonged to the Poseidoniaceae family and some further Gammaproteobacteria MAGs belonging to Thioglobus A (SUP05 clade) and the OM182 clade (Additional file 1).

Dissolved polysaccharides were prime targets of abundant Bacteroidota and Gammaproteobacteria

Thirty-two of the topmost 50 expressed MAGs featured expressed PULs/CAZyme clusters (Fig. 3). Summated expressions for each predicted substrate showed highest peak expression for PULs targeting laminarin, followed by α-glucans, alginate, α-mannose-, and xylan/xylose-containing polysaccharides as well as putative porphyran. The combined expression correlated well with algal biovolume estimates (R: 0.79; p: 1.13 E-6) (Fig. 4 A, B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Combined expression of PULs predicted to target the two most abundant polysaccharide substrates laminarin (GH149, GH17, GH16, GH30, GH158) and α-glucans (GH13, GH65, GH31). B Combined expression of PULs predicted to target less abundant polysaccharide substrates, such as mannose-rich polysaccharides (GH92), porphyran (GH29, GH86), xylan (GH43, GH10), and alginate (PL6, PL7, PL8, PL17). C Antibody-based (BS-400–2, specific for β-1,3-glucan) measurements of dissolved laminarin extracted from high-molecular-weight dissolved organic matter (HMWDOM) either with Milli-Q or EDTA (lines) as compared to the sum of expressed laminarin PULs in transcripts per million (TPM; gray area)

The five bacteroidetal MAGs with the highest expression were, in descending order, Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1, Cd. Prosiliicoccus AB_MB380, Aurantivirga C_MB100, NS4 clade W_MB115, and Polaribacter P_MB288 (Fig. 5A). Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1 featured four PULs predicted to target laminarin (CAZymes: GH149-GH0-GH16_3), α-glucans (GH13), alginate (PL6-PL8-PL7), and an unspecified polysaccharide (GH3-GH130-GH18-CE2). GH0, GH16_3, and GH13 gene expression levels ranged among the top 10% in this MAG, suggesting particular active laminarin and α-glucan degradation (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

A Expression of the five most expressed bacteroidetal MAGs in transcripts per million (TPM) across all sampling time points and total algae biovolumes (mm3/L) in the background (turquoise area). B–E Corresponding transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates. B Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1. C Cd. Prosiliicoccus AB_MB380. D Aurantivirga C_MB100. E Polaribacter P_MB288. Top expressed laminarin and α-glucan PULs are marked (black diamonds)

Cd. Prosiliicoccus MAG AB_MB380 featured three predicted expressed laminarin PULs (GH149-GH0-GH30_1-GH17, GH16_3-GH3, GH16_3). The first belonged to the previously defined variant 1 type laminarin PULs [48, 73] and exhibited the highest overall expression of these three (Fig. 5C). A fourth PUL, predicted to target porphyran, was not expressed. The second Cd. Prosiliicoccus MAG among the topmost expressed MAGs, Q_MB57, had a much weaker overall expression and featured expressed variants 1 and 2 type laminarin PULs, with slightly higher expression of the latter (Fig. S7A in Additional file 1). Specialization of Cd. Prosiliicoccus on laminarin corroborates previous analyses [25].

Polaribacter MAG P_MB288 featured a similar set of expressed PULs as Aurantivirga MAG AI_MB94_1, targeting laminarin (GH149-GH0-GH17-GH16_3-GH30_1), α-glucans (GH13-GH65-GH31), and alginate (PL6-PL7-PL17). These two MAGs exhibited an almost synchronous expression peak at the onset of the second bloom phase, indicating competition for the same polysaccharide niche, in which Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1 notably outcompeted Polaribacter P_MB288 (Fig. 5A). Expression of the PULs in these MAGs correlated well with estimated MAG abundances and furthermore did not change relative to each other over time. Both suggest that these PULs were either unregulated or tightly co-regulated (Fig. 5 B, E). The second Polaribacter MAG among the topmost expressed MAGs, X_MB188, was weaker expressed and contained expressed PULs predicted to target α-glucans and α-mannose-containing sulfated polysaccharides. Respective genes were among the topmost expressed genes in this MAG (Fig. S7B in Additional file 1).

Aurantivirga MAGs AB_MB169 and C_MB100 were less active than AI_MB94_1, but featured more diverse expressed PULs predicted to target not only laminarin and α-glucans but also xylan (GH43_1-GH10), a putative porphyran (GH29-GH86), a sulfated α-mannose-containing polysaccharide (GH92-sulfatases), and additional unspecified glycans (GH2-GH3; GH5-GH16) (Fig. 5; Fig. S6A in Additional file 1). Only the PULs targeting laminarin (variant 1) and the sulfated α-mannose-containing polysaccharide (present only in C_MB100) were notably expressed, with all glycoside hydrolases among the top 10% of expressed genes in their respective MAGs. Laminarin-targeting Aurantivirga C_MB100 peaked in the first bloom phase, while the Aurantivirga Al_MB94_1 peaked in the second bloom with highest expression of its α-glucan-targeting PUL (Fig. 5 A, B), providing a prime example of polysaccharide niche distinction within a genus and thereby indicating compositional changes in polysaccharide substrate availability over time.

The Aurantivirga MAG with the least overall expression, C_MB344, had only two expressed PULs targeting laminarin and α-glucans. In contrast to the PUL in the other three active Aurantivirga MAGs, these PULs did not exhibit similar expression patterns over time. While its laminarin PUL was expressed during both bloom phases, its α-glucan PUL was only expressed during the first bloom phase. This PUL featured an expressed transcriptional regulator, fortifying the view that this PUL’s expression was downregulated during the second bloom phase (Fig. S6B in Additional file 1).

Additional flavobacterial MAGs affiliating with the NS4 marine group and Cd. Abditibacter featured variant 1 laminarin PULs (Figs. S8, S9 in Additional file 1). This PUL in the NS4 clade MAG W_MB115 lacked the characteristic susCD gene pair. Further expressed PULs are discussed in the Additional file 1.

Variant 1 laminarin PULs were expressed by almost three-quarter (11/15) of the active bacteroidetal and a third (7/18) of the active gammaproteobacterial MAGs (Fig. 3, Fig. 6). Most had at least one fusion of a GH17 with an MFS transporter gene, something that was reported previously for the Formosa genus [73]. Such PULs included four of six highly expressed gammaproteobacterial SAR92 MAGs (AK_MB88, B_MB221, V_MB374, X_MB111) (Fig. S10 in Additional file 1), both Luminiphilus MAGs (AA_MB219, T_MB10) and one SAR86 (P_MB137_1) MAG, sometimes with an additional GH158 (Figs. S10, S11 in Additional file 1). Unlike bacteroidetal laminarin PULs, these gammaproteobacterial PULs (all SAR92) were flanked by transcriptional regulators (RNA polymerase sigma factor, ECF subfamily, sigB), suggesting regulation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Genetic organization of highly expressed PULs predicted to target different glycans in bacteroidetal and gammaproteobacterial MAGs. PULs from top expressed MAGs mentioned in Fig. 5 are marked (black diamonds)

In contrast to these Gammaproteobacteria, Glaciecola MAG Y_MB157 possessed seven different expressed PULs, but no variant 1 laminarin PUL. Predicted targets included α-glucans (GH13-GH31), laminarin/β-glucans (GH16_3; GH3-GH16_3; GH3), alginate (PL17_2; PL6_1), and fructans (GH32) (Fig. S12 in Additional file 1). The sole Verrucomicrobiota MAG (B_MB250) exhibited expression of genes coding for α-L-fucosidases, arylsulfatases, and GH33 family glycoside hydrolases. Details on the predicted metabolism of Verrucomicrobiota MAGs obtained from metagenomes off Helgoland Roads were described recently in a dedicated study [56].

Abundant storage polysaccharides played a pivotal role in the carbon flux between algal primary production and bacterial mineralization

As expected for a diatom-dominated bloom, analyses of high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (HMWDOM) with an anti-β-1,3-glucan antibody (BS-400–2) revealed the continuous presence of laminarin (Fig. 4C). PUL expression data also showed highest expression for predicted laminarin PULs, followed by α-glucan PULs, alginate PULs, and PULs targeting mannose-rich sulfated polysaccharides, xylan, and porphyran (Fig. 4B). Based on PUL expression data, laminarin was consumed during both bloom phases, with higher expression during the second bloom phase where algal biovolumes were substantially higher (Fig. 4A). Expression of α-glucan PULs was lower on overall, in particular during the first bloom phase, but featured a remarkably steep almost fourfold increase at the onset of the second bloom phase (Fig. 4A), suggesting a pronounced increase in soluble α-glucans. This confirmed that despite dominance of diatoms during both bloom phases, the response on the bacterioplankton level was rather distinct.

Antibody-based measurements also suggested an abundance of galactose-containing polysaccharides (Additional file 15), specifically galactosyl residues in rhamnogalacturonan I (LM16) and branched (1,6-galactose) (1 → 4)-β-D-galactan (LM26). Intensity data obtained with these two antibodies correlated particularly well with estimated algal biomass data (Fig. S13 in Additional file 1), but interestingly, this was not reflected in corresponding PUL expression in the most abundant MAGs, suggesting a pronounced preference for less complex glycans among the most active bacterioplankton members.

Measurements of monosaccharide concentrations resulting from acid hydrolyzed HMWDOM polysaccharides confirmed that glucose, the monomer of both laminarin and α-glucan storage polysaccharides, was the most abundant monosaccharide in the dissolved fraction during the bloom (Fig. S14). Other abundant monosaccharides comprised, in descending order, fucose (monomer in fucoidan and other fucose-containing polysaccharides), galactose (monomer in galactomannan and pectin side chains), mannose/xylose (monomers in mannans/mannose-containing and xylans/xylose-containing polysaccharides), and glucosamine (monomer in e.g., chitin) (Additional file 11). Further monosaccharides of lesser abundance comprised rhamnose, galactosamine, glucuronic acid, arabinose, and galacturonic acid (Fig. S15 in Additional file 1).


The Helgoland 2020 spring bloom was different from the blooms that we previously analyzed at this location. Algal diversity was remarkably low, and the bloom was split in two distinct phases. The first bloom phase was characterized by notable top-down control by copepods, whereas early phases of previous Helgoland spring blooms during which we analyzed bacterioplankton were largely bottom-up controlled (e.g., [72]). Mild winters, which have become increasingly common during recent decades in the German Bight, entail reduced copepod winter mortalities. Resulting higher copepod numbers in spring lead to an earlier onset of grazing in spring phytoplankton blooms as in the past [77]. The copepod bloom during the 2020 Helgoland spring bloom was accompanied by a notable increase in bacterioplankton total cell counts. This agrees with observations that copepod sloppy feeding and excretion can increase substrate availability to bacteria (e.g., [74]).

During the first bloom phase, algal biovolume was dominated by the large diatom species D. brightwellii. Blooming D. brightwellii are known to inhibit proliferation of other diatom species by toxic metabolites [63]. This may have been one contributing factor to the dominance of D. brightwellii during this phase. Size may have been another factor. D. brightwellii cells tend to form large cells, in particular in colder waters (< 15 °C) [41], as present at Helgoland Roads in spring (Fig. S1A). D. brightwellii observed at Sylt Roads in the North Sea during the sampling period fell into two size classes of 40:120 µm and 70:150 µm in terms of diameter and lengths in pervalvar axis (Additional file 2). Copepods tend to reject very large diatom cells outside of their preferred size range, in particular when these diatoms had sufficient silicate to build thick frustules [65], as was the case during the first bloom phase (Fig. S1C). Still, a certain amount of grazing in concert with diminishing nutrients likely contributed to the reduction of D. brightwellii numbers towards the end of the first bloom phase.

The second bloom phase was dominated by Cerataulina pelagica and Chaetoceros sp. and led to a rapid depletion of silicate, ammonium, and phosphate (Fig. S1 C, D). It is noteworthy that blooming C. pelagica have been reported to cope well with diminished silicate concentrations [4]. Likewise, Chaetoceros sp. are able to take up silicate and other nutrients at low concentrations [9] and thus can thrive after blooms of other diatoms or under depleted nutrient conditions. This may have played a factor in maintaining dominance throughout the entire second bloom phase, even after nutrients became sparse.

Besides food web effects, also hydrodynamics at Helgoland must be considered, as influxes from distinct water bodies can influence population sizes of planktonic species. Influxes of nutrient-rich, coastal waters were detected at the beginning of the first bloom phase and in particular immediately preceding the second bloom phase. The first influx probably prolonged the first bloom phase, and the second was likely instrumental in the development of the second bloom phase. Neither physicochemical nor bacterioplankton data did suggest a fundamental change in water regime by these influx events. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that these influxes had quantifiable effects on plankton population sizes, which precludes speculations on causes for population changes during these two well-defined events.

The unusually low algal diversity during both bloom phases allowed testing of whether blooming bacterioplankton clades responded to specific algae. Many bacterioplankton clades correlated well with distinct diatom species. For example, during the initial D. brightwellii peak on March 26, bacterioplankton clades such as Aurantivirga (C_MB100, C_MB344), NS4, NS2b, Amylibacter, and SAR92 (B_MB221) showed sharp expression peaks. Likewise, Aurantivirga (AI_MB94_1, AB_MB169), Polaribacter, Cd. Prosiliicoccus (formerly classified as Ulvibacter), Glaciecola, SAR92 (except B_MB221), OM43, Ilumatobacter, and Cd. Nanopelagicales activities seemed tightly coupled to the presence of C. pelagica and Chaetoceros sp. diatoms in the second bloom phase. However, in case of the most abundant polysaccharide-degrading bacteria, the presumption of direct coupling to algae species is misleading. Laminarin PUL expression correlated well with overall diatom biomass throughout the bloom, reflecting that diatoms produce laminarin, independent of species. Likewise, the sharp increase in α-glucan PUL expression at the onset of the second phase may not have resulted from a change in diatom species composition. During this time, a steep rise in flagellate numbers was accompanied by an about threefold drop in bacterial cell counts from 1.07 × 106 per mL on April 26 down to 3.41 × 105 per mL on April 30 (Fig. 1C). We hypothesize that bacteria die-off, either due to flagellate grazing or other possible means of increased mortality (e.g., viral lysis), led to the release of copious amounts of bacterial storage α-glucans that allowed specialized, rivaling clades such as Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1 and Polaribacter P_MB288 to thrive. In any case, these results demonstrate that shifts in polysaccharide substrate availability can profoundly shape bacterioplankton community composition during bloom events.

During the terminal bloom phase, expressions of all SAR86, Pelagibacter (AB_MB223, AI_MB285), OM43 (AB_MB181_1), SAR92 (B_MB221), NS4 (W_MB115), NS2b (AK_MB314_1), and UBA952 (O_MB51_1) MAGs increased. Gammaproteobacterial OM43 clade methylotrophs are frequently associated with algal blooms. They thrive on methanol and other C1 compounds that are released by algae [32]. Likewise, the gammaproteobacterial SAR92 and SAR86 clades are often associated with spring blooms at Helgoland [72]. Some of the abundant clades during the terminal bloom phase are copiotrophs in the sense that they quickly acquire and utilize various low-molecular-weight organic algal substrates. Others, like Pelagibacterales/SAR11, are typical oligotrophs that nonetheless can profit from an overall increased availability of nutrients (see [37] for a discussion of the concepts of oligotrophs vs. copiotrophs). As in this study, we have also observed before that absolute SAR11 numbers can increase during spring blooms even though their relative numbers decline (e.g., [72]). Moreover, relative abundances of those Bacteroidota that dominated the second bloom phase decreased notably, indicating that they were outcompeted by fast-growing Gammaproteobacteria upon the massive release of readily metabolizable algal substrates during the bloom’s short-lived terminal phase.

We have described the diverse CAZyme and PUL repertoires of phytoplankton-associated bacterioplankton clades in previous studies (e.g., [6, 16, 25, 44, 73, 79]). Similar PUL types were also identified in the 2020 spring bloom MAGs presented here. Metatranscriptome analyses, however, revealed that the bulk of PULs that were expressed by the most active bacterioplankton clades targeted only few substrate classes, substantiating hypotheses from previous genome- [44] and metagenome-based studies [48]. These substrates are, from higher to lower expression, laminarin/β-glucans, α-glucans, alginates, and mannose- and xylose-containing polysaccharides. In particular, variant 1 laminarin PULs, as previously described in Formosa sp. Hel1_33_131 [73], exhibited high expression levels. High expression of similar laminarin PULs in 18 abundant MAGs (Figs. 5, 6 and Figs. S6–11 in Additional file 1) suggested a stiff competition for laminarin among dominant bacterioplankton clades.

We observed distinct polysaccharide preferences not only among members of distinct clades, but also within abundant members of the same genus. For instance, we found high expression of GH92 α-mannosidases in Aurantivirga C_MB100 as well as expressed laminarin and xylan PULs, whereas Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1 expressed laminarin, α-glucan, and alginate PULs. These preferences seemed to be either hardcoded or tightly co-regulated, because overall PUL expression patterns did not change in most Aurantivirga MAGs. An exception was Aurantivirga MAG C_MB344 that showed a notable downregulation of its α-glucan PUL relative to its laminarin PUL during the second bloom phase (Fig. S6B in Additional file 1).

We have shown before that heterotrophic bacterioplankton clades that respond rapidly to phytoplankton blooms often have relatively small genomes of around 2 Mbp and only few PULs [48]. The top 50 expressed MAGs in this study mostly had genome sizes between 1 Mbp (Pelagibacter and OM43 clade) and 3 Mbp, except Luminiphilus T_MB10, OM182 P_MB234_1, and Ilumatobacter C_MB28, whose MAGs ranged up to ~ 3.5 Mbp. The highest expressed MAG during the second bloom phase, Aurantivirga AI_MB94_1 and Cd. Prosiliicoccus AB_MB380, had sizes around 2.0 to 2.2 Mbp. Regulation is among those traits that are typically reduced during genome streamlining — Pelagibacter ubique being a prime example [27]. Having largely unregulated PULs without obvious transcriptional regulators (i.e., without genes with identifiable regulator motifs) could be an adaptation of Bacteroidota for a swift response to bloom situations and might be among the reasons why Bacteroidota usually outcompete Gammaproteobacteria at the onset of spring phytoplankton blooms at Helgoland Roads (e.g., [71, 72]).

During the last decade, we have isolated thousands of North Sea bacterial strains and classified them using 16S rRNA gene sequencing [1, 30, 31]. Based on comparisons with in situ 16S rRNA amplicon and metagenome data, we found only two flavobacterial Formosa strains [73] and one gammaproteobacterial Reinekea strain [5, 30] that were almost identical to abundant bacterioplankton species during blooms (as evidenced by full genome sequencing). In addition, we could reconstruct the full genome of flavobacterial Cd. Prosiliicoccus vernus from bloom-associated metagenome data [25]. Still, most of the actual bloom-associated planktonic bacteria remain uncultivated, which is why high-quality MAGs together with in situ expression data represent invaluable sources of information on the actual ecophysiological roles of abundant bloom-associated bacteria.

Concluding remarks

Microbial decomposition of algal biomass is a concerted effort of both bacterial specialists and generalists with distinct substrate niches. While resource partitioning is particularly evident for polysaccharides (e.g., [44]), it also plays a role for many other abundant substrates, which are beyond the focus of this particular study. Availability and composition of algae-derived substrates therefore exert a strong influence in shaping the bacterioplankton community during phytoplankton blooms. As we show in this study, abundant, soluble, and structurally simple storage glycans, such as laminarin and α-glucans, play a pivotal role in this process. Also, alginates seem to be readily metabolized, which not only constitute a cell wall component of brown algae but are also produced by some bloom-associated bacteria [26]. However, little did we find about the fate of more structurally complex polysaccharides. These might be preferentially metabolized by particle-associated bacteria or, in case these particles sink, by bacteria in the upper sediment. While planktonic bacteria constitute the bulk of bacteria during algal blooms, future studies should therefore include particle-associated bacteria to ultimately gain a more quantitative understanding about polysaccharide-based carbon fluxes during phytoplankton bloom events.

Materials and methods

Sampling and filtration

Samples were taken from March to May 2020 at the long-term ecological research site “Kabeltonne” (54° 11.3′ N, 7° 54.0′ E) off the coast of Helgoland Roads (North Sea) during a diatom-dominated spring phytoplankton bloom. Seawater was sampled at 1 m depth five times a week as described previously [72] for a total of 55 days.

Ten liters of seawater were filtered sequentially through 10, 3, and 0.2 µm pore-size polycarbonate filters (142 mm diameter) for bacterial biomass. The 10 and 3 µm filters retained most of the eukaryotes, larger particles, and attached bacteria, while the bulk of the free-living bacteria were collected on the 0.2 µm filters. All filtrations were performed in duplicates, and filters were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at − 80 °C until further use.

For cell counting, 10 or 100 mL of unfiltered seawater was fixed with 37% formaldehyde (v/v) to a concentration of 1% (v/v) for 1 h at room temperature. The fixed samples were then filtered directly onto 0.2 µm pore-sized polycarbonate filters (47 mm diameter). All filters were preserved at − 80 °C until further use.

Cell counts of total bacteria and of specific clades

Bacterial cells were stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and counted microscopically for total cell number estimates. Likewise, cells of prominent clades were stained with specific probes for CARD-FISH and counted microscopically. Both techniques were applied as described previously [72]. CARD-FISH probes were as follows: AUR452 (Aurantivirga), POL740 (Polaribacter), Vis6-814 (Vis6 clade including Cd. Abditibacter), SAR86-1245 (SAR86 clade), SAR92-627 (SAR92 clade), OM182-707 (OM182 clade), SAR11-mix (SAR11 clade including Pelagibacter), and Ros537 (Roseobacter clade). Corresponding sequences are provided in Additional file 13.

Physicochemical and phytoplankton measurements

Wind direction data were obtained from the Climate Data Store of the Copernicus Climate Change Service [34]. All other physicochemical parameters, such as temperature, salinity, Secchi depth, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, phosphate, silicate as well as phytoplankton cell numbers and community composition, were obtained as part of the Helgoland Roads time series [47, 78]. Phytoplankton biovolumes were determined according to Hillebrandt et al. 1999 [35] in the framework of the Sylt Roads time series (see [3] for details). Both the Helgoland and Sylt Roads time series are conducted by the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (Bremerhaven, Germany).


Metagenome and metatranscriptome sequencing of biomass from the 0.2 µm filters were performed at the Max Planck Genome Centre (Cologne, Germany). For each time point, one filter was used for the extraction of both DNA and RNA. Isolated RNA was processed to deplete ribosomal RNAs using oligo-based customized probes [54], and the remaining RNA was further used for sequencing. On the basis of chlorophyll a data and cell numbers, we selected 27 time points for sequencing. On three dates, samples were taken twice a day (8 AM, 9 PM), in order to possibly test expression with and without sunlight (not part of this study). This amounts to a total of 30 metagenomes and corresponding metatranscriptomes. Sampling dates and further details are provided in Additional file 14.


Sequencing, assemblies, and binning

Metagenome sequencing was performed on a PacBio Sequel II (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) using one SMRT cell per sample in long-read HiFi mode. Details on the raw data are provided in Additional file 14. Assemblies were generated using Flye v2.8.3 [45] with options − meta and − pacbio-hifi. 16S rRNA sequences were extracted from metagenome assemblies using Barrnap v0.9 [68] and classified using SILVAngs and the Silva database v138.1 [60, 61]. A similarity threshold of 0.97 was used to cluster the sequences for creating OTUs (operational taxonomic units).

Reconstruction of MAGs (metagenome-assembled genomes) was carried out in Anvi’o v7.0 [20]. Initial bins were created with metabat2 [43] from within Anvi’o, refined by invoking the anvi-refine command, and subsequently inspected visually in terms of GC profiles and contig coverages. CheckM v1.0.18 [57] was used to assess MAG completeness and contamination. Since assembly and binning were performed on a per sample basis, redundant MAGs were obtained. We used dRep v3.2.0 [55] to dereplicate MAGs with > 70% completeness and < 5% contamination at 0.95 ANI (average nucleotide identity). MAG phylogenomic affiliations were assigned using GTDB-Tk v1.3.0 [14] with GTDB v202. The taxonomic affiliation of representative MAGs was further improved by extracting 16S rRNA sequences from the MAGs and placing them in the tree using Arb v7.0 [52] and Silva v138.1.


RNA read quality filtering and mapping

Metatranscriptome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). About 100 million paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) were generated per sample. Ribosomal RNA reads were filtered using SortMeRNA v3.0 [46]. Remaining messenger RNA reads were quality trimmed and end repaired using the bbduk and repair scripts of the BBMap v35.14 suite ( Reads with a minimum read length of 70 bp were subsequently mapped onto all 251 representative MAGs using Bowtie2 [49] as a part of the SqueezeMeta v1.3.1 pipeline [70]. Mapping statistics are provided in Additional file 14.

Integrated analysis

We used SqueezeMeta in merged mode for the integrated analysis of metagenomes and corresponding metatranscriptomes. Concatenated MAGs were supplied to SqueezeMeta as metagenome assembly. Contig statistics were calculated using Prinseq v0.20.4 [66]. RNAs were predicted using Barrnap and subsequently classified using the RDP classifier [76]. Aragorn [50] was used for the prediction of tRNA/tmRNA sequences. ORFs were predicted externally using FragGeneScan (parameters w1 and sanger_5) [62] and searched against GenBank r239 [17], eggNOG v5.0 [38], KEGG r58.0 [42], and CAZy (as of 30 July 2020) [12] using Diamond [11]. HMM homology searches were done using HMMER3 [18] against the Pfam 33.0 database [24]. Combined annotations were used for manual prediction of PULs and CAZyme clusters. We denominated co-localizations of CAZyme, susCD, or susC genes as PULs and co-localizations of CAZyme genes without susCD or with other transporters (e.g., of the MFS type) as CAZyme clusters. Mapping of mRNA reads against contigs (concatenated MAGs) was performed using Bowtie2, and transcripts per million (TPM) values were calculated for all MAGs of a given sample as follows: (Σ reads of sample successfully mapping to a MAG × 10^6)/(Σ lengths of contigs of the MAG × Σ number of reads in the sample). Results were visualized using the SQMtools R package.

Saccharide measurements

High molecular weight DOM (HMWDOM) was sampled using tangential flow filtration in parallel to OMICs sampling from the same water body. Samples were processed as described previously [75] with slight modifications (see Additional file 1). In brief, polysaccharides from HMWDOM samples were extracted and analyzed using carbohydrate microarrays in combination with monoclonal antibodies specific for various polysaccharides (Additional file 15). Antibody-binding signal intensities were quantified with Array-Pro Analyzer 6.3 (Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).

Aliquots of the HMWDOM samples were also used for monosaccharide analysis by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) with a Dionex CarboPac PA10 column (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as described elsewhere [19, 75].

Availability of data and materials

Metagenome, metatranscriptome, and MAG sequence data are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (accession PRJEB52999). Supporting environmental data is also available as Zenodo repository (


  1. Alejandre-Colomo C, Harder J, Fuchs BM, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. High-throughput cultivation of heterotrophic bacteria during a spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Sea. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2020;43(2): 126066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso C, Warnecke F, Amann R, Pernthaler J. High local and global diversity of Flavobacteria in marine plankton. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9(5):1253–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Armonies W, Asmus H, Buschbaum C, Lackschewitz D, Reise K, Rick J. Microscopic species make the diversity: a checklist of marine flora and fauna around the Island of Sylt in the North Sea. Helgol Mar Res. 2018;72(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ault T, Velzeboer R, Zammit R. Influence of nutrient availability on phytoplankton growth and community structure in the Port Adelaide River, Australia: bioassay assessment of potential nutrient limitation. Hydrobiologia. 2000;429(1):89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Avcı B, Hahnke RL, Chafee M, Fischer T, Gruber-Vodicka H, Tegetmeyer HE, et al. Genomic and physiological analyses of ‘Reinekea forsetii’ reveal a versatile opportunistic lifestyle during spring algae blooms. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(3):1209–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Avcı B, Krüger K, Fuchs BM, Teeling H, Amann RI. Polysaccharide niche partitioning of distinct Polaribacter clades during North Sea spring algal blooms. ISME J. 2020;14(6):1369–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Becker S, Tebben J, Coffinet S, Wiltshire K, Iversen MH, Harder T, et al. Laminarin is a major molecule in the marine carbon cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(12):6599–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoiston AS, Ibarbalz FM, Bittner L, Guidi L, Jahn O, Dutkiewicz S, et al. The evolution of diatoms and their biogeochemical functions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372(1728):20160397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Booth BC, Larouche P, Bélanger S, Klein B, Amiel D, Mei ZP. Dynamics of Chaetoceros socialis blooms in the North Water. Deep Sea Res. 2002;49(22–23):5003–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(8):725–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D233-238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Castberg T, Larsen A, Sandaa RA, Brussaard CPD, Egge JK, Heldal M, et al. Microbial population dynamics and diversity during a bloom of the marine coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta). Mar Ecol Pro Ser. 2001;221:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36(6):1925–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chegini F, Holtermann P, Kerimoglu O, Becker M, Kreus M, Klingbeil K, et al. Processes of stratification and destratification during an extreme river discharge event in the German Bight ROFI. J Geophys Res Oceans. 2020;125(8),e2019JC015987.

  16. Chen J, Robb CS, Unfried F, Kappelmann L, Markert S, Song T, et al. Alpha-and beta-mannan utilization by marine Bacteroidetes. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20(11):4127–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D67-72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform. 2009;23(1):205–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Engel A, Händel N. A novel protocol for determining the concentration and composition of sugars in particulate and in high molecular weight dissolved organic matter (HMW-DOM) in seawater. Mar Chem. 2011;127(1–4):180–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eren AM, Esen OC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3: e1319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science. 1998;281(5374):200–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrer-González FX, Widner B, Holderman NR, et al. Resource partitioning of phytoplankton metabolites that support bacterial heterotrophy. ISME J. 2021;15:762–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski PG. Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science. 1998;281(5374):237–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D279-285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Francis TB, Krüger K, Fuchs BM, Teeling H, Amann RI. Candidatus Prosiliicoccus vernus, a spring phytoplankton bloom associated member of the Flavobacteriaceae. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2019;42(1):41–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Francis B, Urich T, Mikolasch A, Teeling H, Amann R. North Sea spring bloom-associated Gammaproteobacteria fill diverse heterotrophic niches. Environ Microbiome. 2021;16:15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Giovannoni SJ, Tripp HJ, Givan S, Podar M, Vergin KL, Baptista D, et al. Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science. 2005;309(5738):1242–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grieb A, Francis TB, Krüger K, Orellana LH, Amann R, Fuchs BM. Candidatus Abditibacter, a novel genus within the Cryomorphaceae, thriving in the North Sea. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2020;43(4): 126088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gügi B, Le Costaouëc T, Burel C, Lerouge P, Helbert W, Bardor M. Diatom-specific oligosaccharide and polysaccharide structures help to unravel biosynthetic capabilities in diatoms. Mar Drugs. 2015;13:5993–6018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hahnke RL, Bennke CM, Fuchs BM, Mann AJ, Rhiel E, Teeling H, et al. Dilution cultivation of marine heterotrophic bacteria abundant after a spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Sea. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17(10):3515–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hahnke RL, Harder J. Phylogenetic diversity of Flavobacteria isolated from the North Sea on solid media. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013;36(7):497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Halsey KH, Carter AE, Giovannoni SJ. Synergistic metabolism of a broad range of C1 compounds in the marine methylotrophic bacterium HTCC2181. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14(3):630–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heins A, Reintjes G, Amann RI, Harder J. Particle collection in Imhoff sedimentation cones enriches both motile chemotactic and particle-attached bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 643730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Biavati G, Horányi A, Muñoz Sabater J, et al. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1959 to present. 2018. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). Accessed 03 Feb 2023.

  35. Hillebrand H, Dürselen C, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol. 1999;35(2):403–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hillebrand H. Top-down versus bottom-up control of autotrophic biomass - a meta-analysis on experiments with periphyton. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2002;21:349–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ho A, Di Lonardo DP, Bodelier PLE. Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology, FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93(3):fix006.

  38. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D286-93.

  39. Iannino A, Fink P, Weitere M. Feedback between bottom-up and top-down control of stream biofilm mediated through eutrophication effects on grazer growth. Sci Rep. 2021;11:21621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ianora A, Casotti R, Bastianini M, Brunet C, d’Ippolito G, Acri F, et al. Low reproductive success for copepods during a bloom of the non-aldehyde-producing diatom Cerataulina pelagica in the North Adriatic Sea. Mar Ecol. 2008;29(3):399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jung SW, Youn SJ, Shin HH, Yun SM, Ki J-S, Lee JH. Effect of temperature on changes in size and morphology of the marine diatom, Ditylum brightwellii (West) Grunow (Bacillariophyceae). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2013;135:128-36.

  42. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7: e7359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kappelmann L, Krüger K, Hehemann J-H, Harder J, Markert S, Unfried F, et al. Polysaccharide utilization loci of North Sea Flavobacteriia as basis for using SusC/D-protein expression for predicting major phytoplankton glycans. ISME J. 2019;13(1):76–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):540–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kopylova E, Noe L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(24):3211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kraberg A, Kieb U, Peters S, Wiltshire KH. An updated phytoplankton check-list for the Helgoland Roads time series station with eleven new records of diatoms and dinoflagellates. Helgol Mar Res. 2019;73(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Krüger K, Chafee M, Francis TB, Del Rio TG, Becher D, Schweder T, et al. In marine Bacteroidetes the bulk of glycan degradation during algae blooms is mediated by few clades using a restricted set of genes. ISME J. 2019;13(11):2800–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Laslett D, Canback B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(1):11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Löder MGJ, Meunier C, Wiltshire KH, Boersma M, Aberle N. The role of ciliates, heterotrophic dinoflagellates and copepods in structuring spring plankton communities at Helgoland Roads. North Sea Mar Biol. 2011;158(7):1551–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(4):1363–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mann DG. The species concept in diatoms. Phycologia. 1999;38(6):437–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nobori T, Velásquez AC, Wu J, Kvitko BH, Kremer JM, Wang Y, et al. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. PNAS. 2018;115(13):E3055-3064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11(12):2864–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Orellana LH, Francis TB, Ferraro M, Hehemann J-H, Fuchs BM, Amann RI. Verrucomicrobiota are specialist consumers of sulfated methyl pentoses during diatom blooms. ISME J. 2021;16:630–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D785–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Patel AK, Vadrale AP, Singhania RR, et al. Algal polysaccharides: current status and future prospects. Phytochem Rev. 2022;1–30.

  60. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590-596.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rho M, Tang H, Ye Y. FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(20): e191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Rijstenbil JW. Competitive interaction between Ditylum brightwellii and Skeletonema costatum by toxic metabolites. Neth J Sea Res. 1989;23(1):23–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rosemond AD. Interactions among irradiance, nutrients, and herbivores constrain a stream algal community. Oecologia. 1993;94:585–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ryderheim F, Grønning J, Kiørboe T. Thicker shells reduce copepod grazing on diatoms. Limnol Oceanogr Lett. 2022;7:435-42.

  66. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):863–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Schrum C. Thermohaline stratification and instabilities at tidal mixing fronts: results of an eddy resolving model for the German Bight. Cont Shelf Res. 1997;17(6):689–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sergeev VN, Gerasimenko LM, Zavarzin GA. The Proterozoic history and present state of cyanobacteria. Microbiology. 2002;71(6):623–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Tamames J, Puente-Sanchez F. SqueezeMeta, a highly portable, fully automatic metagenomic analysis pipeline. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Teeling H, Fuchs BM, Becher D, Klockow C, Gardebrecht A, Bennke CM, et al. Substrate-controlled succession of marine bacterioplankton populations induced by a phytoplankton bloom. Science. 2012;336(6081):608–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Teeling H, Fuchs BM, Bennke CM, Krüger K, Chafee M, Kappelmann L, Reintjes G, Waldmann J, Quast C, Glöckner FO, Lucas J, Wichels A, Gerdts G, Wiltshire KH, Amann RI. Recurring patterns in bacterioplankton dynamics during coastal spring algae blooms. eLife. 2016;5:e11888.

  73. Unfried F, Becker S, Robb CS, Hehemann J-H, Markert S, Heiden SE, et al. Adaptive mechanisms that provide competitive advantages to marine bacteroidetes during microalgal blooms. ISME J. 2018;12:2894–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Vargas CA, Cuevas LA, Gonzalez HE, Daneri G. Bacterial growth response to copepod grazing in aquatic ecosystems. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 2007;87(3):667–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Vidal-Melgosa S, Sichert A, Francis TB, Bartosik D, Niggemann J, Wichels A, et al. Diatom fucan polysaccharide precipitates carbon during algal blooms. Nat Comm. 2021;12(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wiltshire KH, Malzahn AM, Wirtz K, Greve W, Janisch S, Mangelsdorf P, et al. Resilience of North Sea phytoplankton spring bloom dynamics: an analysis of long-term data at Helgoland Roads. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53(4):1294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wiltshire KH, Kraberg A, Bartsch I, Boersma M, Franke HD, Freund JA, et al. Helgoland Roads, North Sea: 45 years of change. Est Coast. 2010;33:295–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Xing P, Hahnke RL, Unfried F, Markert S, Huang S, Barbeyron T, et al. Niches of two polysaccharide-degrading Polaribacter isolates from the North Sea during a spring diatom bloom. ISME J. 2015;9(6):1410–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Yager PL, Connelly TL, Mortazavi B, Wommack KE, Bano N, Bauer JE, et al. Dynamic bacterial and viral response to an algal bloom at subzero temperatures. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46(4):790–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Eva Maria Brodte, Antje Wichels, and Uwe Nettelmann from the Biological Station Helgoland (BAH-AWI, Germany), the LTER team, the captains and crews from FS Aade and FS Uthörn for help with sampling, analyses, logistics, and providing lab space. We thank Marcel Huntemann (Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, USA) for assistance with MAG annotations and Tina Trautmann (MPI Bremen, Germany) for saccharide measurements. We also thank Fengqing Wang, Mikkel Schultz Johansen (both MPI Bremen), and Lilly Franzmeyer (University of Greifswald) for their help with sampling. We thank Jörg Wulf, Karl-Peter Rücknagel, Mirja Meiners, Lisa Bauer, and Anja Greiser (all MPI Bremen) for their technical support with CARD-FISH.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was funded by the Max Planck Society and supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the framework of the research unit FOR2406 “Proteogenomics of Marine Polysaccharide Utilization (POMPU)” by grants of HT (TE 813/2–2), RA (AM 73/9–2), BF (FU 627/2–2), JHH (HE 7217/2–2), and TS (SCHW 595/10–2 & 11–2). The Helgoland time series of the Alfred-Wegener-Institute is supported by the Helmholtz Association as an LK-II performance category program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



H.T., T.S., J-H.H., B.M.F., R.I.A.: study design. C.S.: bioinformatics, data integration and analysis. I.V.K., C.L.M., K.H.W.: Helgoland Roads time series data. J.R.: algal biovolumes. V.F.: hydrodynamics. S.V.M: antibody-based polysaccharide measurements. N.S.: monosaccharide measurements. B.H.: sequencing. C.S., H.T.: compilation of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bernhard M. Fuchs, Rudolf I. Amann or Hanno Teeling.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was not required for the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Fig. S1. A. Levels of salinity and temperature. B. Total bacterial cell counts and flagellate counts. C, D. Concentrations of  silicate, phosphate, nitrate, and ammonium. Fig. S2. Wind directions and speeds at 10 m above the sea surface level as obtained from the Climate Data Store of the Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA 5 product). Corresponding wind vector data is provided in Additional file 4. Fig. S3. Quality measures of the MAGs obtained in this study. Fig. S4. Overall expression of all mentioned clades in terms of transcripts per million during the 2020 North Sea spring bloom. Fig. S5. Transcription pattern of seven archaeal MAGs obtained in this study. Fig. S6. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in Aurantivirga MAG AB_MB169 and C_MB344. Fig. S7. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in Cd. Prosiliicoccus MAG Q_MB57 and Polaribacter MAG X_MB288. Fig. S8. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in Abditibacter MAG D_MB74 and L_MB280. Fig. S9. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in NS4 clade MAG W_MB115. Fig. S10. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in all SAR92 clade MAGs: AK_MB88_1, B_MB221, X_MB111, V_MB374, AB_MB236 and SAR86 MAG: P_MB137_1. Fig. S11. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in Luminiphilus OM60 (NOR5) clade MAGs: AA_MB219 and T_MB10. Fig. S12. Transcriptional profiles of PULs and their predicted polysaccharide substrates in the highly expressed and sole Glaciecola MAG Y_MB157. Fig. S13. Antibody-based measurements (LM16, specific for galactosyl residues in rhamnogalacturonan I and LM26, specific for branched (1,6-galactose)(1→4)-β-D-galactan) of galactose-containing polysaccharides extracted either with MilliQ or EDTA (lines) as compared to the estimated algal biomass data (gray area). Fig. S14. Comparison of the combined expression of PULs targeting laminarin and α-glucan storage polysaccharides that both consist entirely of glucose, and the measured concentrations of glucose in polysaccharides from HMWDOM. Fig. S15. Measured concentrations of monosaccharides other than glucose in HMWDOM across samples.

Additional file 2:

 Total algal cell counts and biovolumes (BV), inorganic nutrients and precipitation measured during the 2020 Helgoland spring phytoplankton bloom.

Additional file 3:

 Copepod counts during the 2020 Helgoland spring phytoplankton bloom.

Additional file 4:

 Wind vector components, direction and speed data at 10 m above the sea surface. 

Additional file 5:

 Sampling dates and statistics of 16S rRNA sequences extracted from PacBio Sequel II raw reads.

Additional file 6:

 Relative abundances of 16S rRNA gene sequences extracted from metagenomes.

Additional file 7:

 Microscopic cell counts with fluorescently labeled CARD-FISH probes.

Additional file 8:

 Numbers of bins obtained by metagenome binning using Anvi'o.

Additional file 9:

 GTDB affiliation of all MAGs dereplicated at 0.95 ANI along with other genomic features.

Additional file 10:

 TPM (transcripts per million) values of major clades during the 2020 Helgoland spring phytoplankton bloom.

Additional file 11:

 Monosaccharide concentrations resulting from acid hydrolysis of high molecular weight DOM polysaccharides.

Additioanl file 12:

 Antibody-based (BS-400-2, specific for β-1,3-glucan) measurements of dissolved laminarin extracted either with MilliQ or EDTA.

Additional file 13:

 CARD-FISH probes used in this study.

Additional file 14:

 Sampling dates and statistics of raw data obtained for metagenomes and metatranscriptomes.

Additional file 15:

 Polysaccharide measurements during the 2020 Helgoland Spring phytoplankton bloom.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidhu, C., Kirstein, I.V., Meunier, C.L. et al. Dissolved storage glycans shaped the community composition of abundant bacterioplankton clades during a North Sea spring phytoplankton bloom. Microbiome 11, 77 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Algal bloom
  • Algal polysaccharide
  • Alpha-glucan
  • Bacterioplankton
  • Bacteroidota
  • Beta-glucan
  • Helgoland Roads LTER
  • Laminarin