Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization of diazotrophic root endophytes in Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis)

Microbiome volume 10, Article number: 186 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 16 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Phytoremediation is a potentially cost-effective way to remediate highly contaminated mine tailing sites. However, nutrient limitations, especially the deficiency of nitrogen (N), can hinder the growth of plants and impair the phytoremediation of mine tailings. Nevertheless, pioneer plants can successfully colonize mine tailings and exhibit potential for tailing phytoremediation. Diazotrophs, especially diazotrophic endophytes, can promote the growth of their host plants. This was tested in a mine-tailing habitat by a combination of field sampling, DNA-stable isotope probing (SIP) analysis, and pot experiments.

Results

Bacteria belonging to the genera Herbaspirillum, Rhizobium, Devosia, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, and Delftia are crucial endophytes for Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis) grown in the tailing, the model pioneer plant selected in this study. Further, DNA-SIP using 15N2 identified Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Exiguobacterium as putative diazotrophic endophytes of M. sinensis. Metagenomic-binning suggested that these bacteria contained essential genes for nitrogen fixation and plant growth promotion. Finally, two diazotrophic endophytes Rhizobium sp. G-14 and Pseudomonas sp. Y-5 were isolated from M. sinensis. Inoculation of another pioneer plant in mine tailings, Bidens pilosa, with diazotrophic endophytes resulted in successful plant colonization, significantly increased nitrogen fixation activity, and promotion of plant growth.

Conclusions

This study indicated that diazotrophic endophytes have the potential to promote the growth of pioneer plant B. pilosa in mine tailings.

Video Abstract

Background

Mine tailings are fine-grained minerals (1–600 μm) generated from the processing of ores [1]. It is estimated that more than 10 billion tons of waste are produced from mine activities annually [2]. The contamination introduced by mine tailings represents a global environmental challenge because they can leach toxic metal(loid)s, such as antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) [3,4,5]. Mine tailings heavily contaminate China, with over 10 billion tons of tailings produced since 2009 [6]. Phytoremediation using living plants to clean up contaminated soils has many potential benefits over traditional physical and chemical cleanup approaches. It is minimally disruptive, cost-efficient, and has high levels of public acceptance [7, 8]. For these reasons, phytoremediation is well suited to manage and remediate mine tailing contamination [9]. Re-vegetation is the first step for tailing phytoremediation and offers a promising way to reduce the environmental impact of tailings. Pioneer plants that can tolerate high metal(loid) concentrations are ideal for tailing re-vegetation and support the further establishment of other plant species by increasing soil nutrients [10] and/or reducing soil acidity [10, 11]. Since oligotrophic (e.g., C, N, P deficiency) mine tailings [12,13,14] are unfavorable environments for plant growth, it is important to understand how the pioneer plants gain sufficient nutrients in mining tailings and whether similar mechanisms can be applied for other plants.

Nitrogen (N) is an essential factor that regulates the growth of microorganisms and plants, governing the efficiency of phytoremediation of mine tailing [15,16,17]. Biological N fixation (BNF) mediated by diazotrophs has important environmental implications in tailings by supplementing N to plants and may contribute to phytoremediation [18]. Previous studies observed the enrichment of diazotrophs and their important environmental roles in tailings relatively to adjacent soils [19, 20]. Unlike rhizosphere-associated diazotrophs, diazotrophic endophytes live within plant tissues and establish themselves in less competitive niches with more favorable conditions for N fixation [21,22,23]. Many diazotrophic endophytes hold the potential to promote plant growth in monocot crops (e.g., sugarcane, rice, and maize), dicot crops (e.g., sweet potato and coffee), and bioenergy crops (e.g., poplar and willow) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. For example, sugarcane inoculation with diazotrophic endophytes resulted in a 40% higher fresh cane weight than those inoculated with a dysfunctional mutant for N2 fixation [31]. Additionally, inoculating ryegrass plants with diazotrophic endophytes, isolated from native poplar grown under nutrient-poor conditions, significantly increased plant biomass [32]. Thus, endophytic diazotrophic bacteria can potentially promote the establishment of pioneer plants in tailings and thus contribute to tailing vegetation and phytoremediation.

Miscanthus sinensis (Chinese silver grass) is a pioneer perennial grass plant native to eastern Asia and extensively encountered in mine tailings [33]. Miscanthus is known for its high metal accumulation potential and biomass production, making it well suited for phytoremediation of mine tailings [34]. Moreover, M. sinensis root-associated microbiome may contribute to metal resistance, nutrient acquisition, and promote plant growth [20]. Hence, M. sinensis was selected as the model pioneer plant for this study. We sampled M. sinensis from 4 mine tailings across Southwest China. Initially, an endospheric microbiome of M. sinensis was characterized and compared with those grown at less contaminated sites. Then, DNA stable isotope probing (DNA-SIP) using 15N2 coupled with metagenomic-binning analysis was performed to identify putative diazotrophic endophytes and predict their metabolic potentials. This approach links microbial identity with environmental function and provides a better understanding of active diazotrophic communities without isolation and cultivation. Finally, to assess the capability of diazotrophic endophytes to promote plant growth, Bidens pilosa, another plant frequently detected in mine tailings with rapid growth capability, was inoculated with native diazotrophic endophytes isolated from M. sinensis (see Figure S1 for overview of the experimental design). The current study aimed to (i) investigate the endospheric keystone taxa of M. sinensis that grow in mine tailings; (ii) identify diazotrophic endophytes of M. sinensis; and (iii) assess the feasibility of inoculated diazotrophic endophytes to promote plant growth in mine tailings.

Methods

Sample collection and preparation

A total of 20 M. sinensis root samples were collected from 4 mine tailings across Southwest China (5 root samples per sampling site). Control root samples were collected from nearby less contaminated sites (see Figure S2 for details). Chemical properties of sampling sites were measured and summarized in Table S1. Plant root samples were collected using an ethanol sterilized shovel and kept on ice in sterile bags.

DNA from root endosphere was extracted as described previously [20]. Roots were washed with TE-buffer (adding 2% Tween 20, pH 7.5), surface-sterilized using 2% NaClO for 10 min, and then washed using 70% ethanol 5 times. Finally, the root samples were washed with sterile deionized water for 4 times. The last wash was spread on LB gar plates to check whether microorganisms were removed [35]. Then, root samples were ground with liquid N, and DNA was extracted with a DNeasy Powersoil kit [36] according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN, Dresden, Germany). The quality and quantity of DNA were examined by the NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Identification of diazotrophic endophytes using DNA-SIP

Extraction of root endophytic microorganisms

Root samples of M. sinensis taken from the Xikuangshan (XKS) site were chosen to extract the cultivable endophytic microorganisms using a Nycodenz density-gradient centrifugation method [37,38,39]. To ensure only endophytes were extracted, the surface sterilization was further confirmed by applying wash buffer (R1, R2, R3) to LB agar plates. For the wash buffer R3, no growth was observed after 7 days of incubation at 28 °C (see Figure S3 for details), suggesting that no root-surface-associated live microorganisms were isolated. Therefore, bacteria identified by DNA-SIP or used in pot experiments were presumably root endophytes because only cultivable microorganisms were targeted in these two experiments.

DNA-SIP

DNA-SIP was conducted to demonstrate nitrogen fixation using 15 N-labelled versus 14 N-labelled N2. Endospheric bacterial cultures mentioned above was used as inoculants to set up cultures for DNA-SIP. First, 20% N-free Jensen's broth (broth:distilled water = 1:5 (v:v)) (M973, HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India) was replaced with 30 mL mixed gas (15N2(or 14N2):O2 = 8:2 (v:v)) in a 60-mL serum bottle using the drainage method. Then, approximately 1 mL of the extracted microbial culture was mixed with the remaining 30 mL broth using a sterile syringe. All microcosms were incubated at 30 °C at 180 rpm in the dark and were destructively sampled on days 21, 28, and 35.

SIP gradient fractionation

The extracted DNA of SIP incubations was separated into “heavy” (i.e., 15 N-DNA) and “light” (i.e., 14 N-DNA) fractions by CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation (Additional files, [13]).

Sequencing of 16S rRNA

DNA from M. sinensis roots collected from tailings and DNA-SIP treatments 14N2 and 15N2 (triplicate samples, day 28 and day 35) were used for amplicon sequencing of the V4 of 16S rRNA gene using 515F/806R [40]. The products were sequenced at Personal Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The raw reads were trimmed and quality controlled by QIIME2, and chimeras were removed by DADA2 [41]. Representative amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were assigned against the SILVA 132 database. The alpha diversity, PCoA, and co-occurrence network were analyzed based on the previous description [42].

Shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Since the mass of DNA in a single heavy fraction of the SIP samples was insufficient for sequencing, the heavy fractions with nifH copy numbers from each of the triplicate 15 N treatments were pooled as one composite DNA sample, which was sequenced at Personal Biotechnology (Shanghai, China) (Additional files).

Diazotroph isolation and phylogenetic analysis

Cultures from the DNA-SIP assay at day 35 were used for the isolation of the diazotrophic bacteria. Briefly, the cultures were serially diluted in 0.9% NaCl solution (up to 10−5) and then screened on agar plates containing the N-free Jensen's medium (M710). The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days, and colonies were further purified and characterized. Then, PCR amplification of the nifH gene was performed to screen for diazotrophs [43]. An acetylene reduction assay was conducted to measure the nitrogenase activity to confirm the capability for nitrogen fixation [43]. The near full-length 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pair 27F/1492R and sequenced, and sequences were annotated against the NCBI database. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA. The morphology of the isolated strains was examined by scanning electron microscopy (Phenom proX, Phenom-World BV, Netherlands).

Growth promotion potential of isolated diazotrophs

A pot experiment was employed to assess the growth promotion potential and colonization ability of the isolated diazotrophs on B. pilosa L. Four different treatments in triplicate were established as follows: (i) inoculation with Rhizobium sp. G-14 (designated as Rhi.Inoc.), (ii) inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. Y-5 (designated as Pseu. Inoc.), (iii) inoculation with the mixture of Rhizobium sp. G-14 and Pseudomonas sp. Y-5 (designated as Mix. Inoc.), and (iv) treatments without inoculating pure isolates (designated as control) (Additional files).

15 N 2 enrichment incubation assay

To determine whether the diazotrophic endophytes facilitate N fixation, a 15N2 enrichment incubation assay was conducted by planting B. pilosa L. in a sterile sealed anaerobic tube (please see Figure S4 for details of the experimental setup). The mixture of tailings and vermiculite (v:v = 1:1) was added to the 50 mL sterile serum tubes. Seeds of B. pilosa L. and 3 mL bacterial suspension obtained as described in the section of growth promotion potential of isolated diazotroph (or deionized water in control treatment) were added into the anaerobic tubes. After germination, the anaerobic tubes were sealed, and 10% (v/v) of the headspace was replaced with 15N2. After culturing for 2 days, the anaerobic tubes were ventilated again for 1 day, which is designated as one cycle. The samples, including rhizosphere soil, root, and shoot were collected destructively after 3 cycles and were freeze-dried for further 15 N isotope analysis. The δ15N value of processed plant tissue was determined by an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IR-MS, DELTA V Advantage Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Statistical analysis and data availability

Student’s t test was performed to examine the significance of the differences in the microbial abundance and nifH relative abundance (nifH abundance/16S rRNA abundance) of M. sinensis root endosphere using the SPSS software v.20. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the least significant difference (LSD) test was conducted to determine the significance of the differences in fresh weight, 15 N abundance, N content, the relative expression of nifH, and Rhizobium/Pseudomonas abundances of B. pilosa using SPSS v20.0. The raw data have been submitted to the NCBI database for public use (accession no PRJNA818089).

Results

Bacterial community and keystone taxon analysis of the M. sinensis root endosphere

M. sinensis plants were collected from four highly contaminated tailing sites (HC) and from adjacent sites with lower contaminant levels (LC). The endospheric microbial communities were extracted and characterized. Microbial diversity analysis indicated that lower alpha diversities (e.g., Chao1, Observed, and Shannon) of the endosphere microbiome were observed in the HC samples compared to those of LC (Fig. 1A). Bacterial community compositions were significantly different between the HC and LC based on the Bray–Curtis similarity (PERMANOVA, R = 0.95, p < 0.01) as visualized by two distinct clusters (Fig. 1B). The microbial community compositions indicated different distributions of the dominant microbial community members. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes ranked as the top 3 most abundant phyla (see Figure S5 for details). t test analyses further demonstrated that Proteobacteria was dominant in HC while Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes were dominant in LC. Further analysis at the genus level indicated that while Rhizobium was the most dominant genus in the HC, accounting for 5.5% of the relative abundance (Fig. 1C), Anaeromyxobacter was the most dominant genus in the LC, accounting for 5.7% of the relative abundance. In addition, while the genera Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, Devosia, Flavobacterium, and Stenotrophomonas were significantly enriched at HC sites, members of Bacillus were abundant at LC sites (Fig. 1C). Further, keystone taxa were identified according to the criteria of the nodes with low betweenness centralities and high degree as reported previously [44, 45] (Fig. 1F, G). In LC, 12 ASVs were identified as the keystone taxa (see Fig. 1D and Tables S2 and S3 for details). In contrast, the keystone taxa in the HC network were significantly different (see Fig. 1E and Tables S4 and S5 for details). Notably, the identified keystone taxa were different in LC and HC sites except Devosia. In addition, the high nifH relative abundance (nifH abundance/16S rRNA abundance, Figure S6) were observed in the HC sites.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The boxplots show the bacterial alpha diversity indices in the root endosphere at the low contaminated (LC) and the high contaminated (HC) sites (A). The PCoA plot of beta similarities was measured as Bray–Curtis distances for the bacterial community (B). Comparison of the different genera distribution between LC and HC sites (C). * and ** indicate significant differences between the LC and HC at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Co-occurrence network analysis showing the biological interactions in the LC (D) and HC (E). Edges are shown only strong (Spearman correlation >|0.6|) and significant (p < 0.05) connections. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of connections to it. The scatter plot shows criteria of selecting for the keystone taxa in the LC (F) and HC (G). The bacterial community was analyzed based on 5 replicate root samples from each sampling site (a total of 20 root samples)

Full size image

Diazotrophic endophytes identified by DNA-SIP

DNA-SIP was conducted to identify M. sinensis root endophytes with diazotrophic capacities. Accordingly, 15N2 was applied to cultures inoculated from root endosphere bacterial extracts. The relative abundances of nifH across each fraction at three time points (e.g., days 21, 28, and 35) are shown in Fig. 2A. The gradual incorporation of 15N2 into the DNA of endophytes was observed as a proxy for N fixation. The maximum relative abundances were initially detected in the light fractions (with buoyant density (BD) values of 1.71 g mL−1 in the 14N2 treatment on day 21) and gradually shifted to the heavier fractions in the 15N2 treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Relative abundances of nifH from the treatment 14 N and 15 N after incubation. The abundance of the nifH gene in each fraction was converted to the proportion of total nifH gene abundance throughout the gradient fractions. B Relative abundances of 14 most abundant microbial genera in light, 14 N treatment, and heavy 15 N DNA fractions at days 28 and 35. Each bubble stands for one DNA fraction. Triplicate fractions were sequenced for each treatment

Full size image

The fractions with the highest relative abundances of nifH genes on days 28 and 35 were selected for amplicon-based metagenomic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene (Fig. 2B). Bacteria taxonomically affiliated with Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium dominated in the heavy DNA fractions of the 15N2-labeled treatments while not in the corresponding light fractions, suggesting the potential role of Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium as diazotrophic endophytes for M. sinensis.

Metabolic potentials of putative diazotrophic endophytes

Four high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) with > 75% completeness and < 5% contamination were phylogenetically classified to the genera Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and Microbacterium (Fig. 3A). MAGs associated with putative diazotrophic endophytes Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium identified by DNA-SIP were designated as bins 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Genes related to N2 fixation were identified in all these three MAGs (Fig. 3B). In addition, genes related to plant colonization such as quorum sensing system, ROS-deactivation, and EPS production were detected in all three MAGs (Please see “Discussion” section for details) (Fig. 3B). These MAGs also contain genes for metal(loid)-resistance (e.g., arsenic, nickel, cobalt, zinc, manganese, copper, and cadmium) and plant growth promotion (PGP) (e.g., phosphate solubilization function, siderophore production, gamma-aminobutyric acid production, and acetoin/butanediol synthesis).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenomic tree of MAGs from the metagenome of heavy DNA fractions. The genes encoding nitrogen fixation, plant colonization, plant growth promotion, and metal(oid) resistance in the MAGs associated with putative diazotrophs (B). The height of the bar indicates gene abundance

Full size image

Isolation of diazotrophic endophytes and their capability for plant growth promotion

Two diazotrophic endophytes, Pseudomonas sp. Y-5 and Rhizobium sp. G-14 were isolated from the root endosphere of M. sinensis (see Figure S7A, B for details). Notably, both isolates are phylogenetically relevant to the putative diazotrophic endophytes identified by DNA-SIP. Consequently, acetylene reduction analyses of nitrogenase activity confirmed BNF capability of the isolates (Figure S7C). Unfortunately, no diazotrophic endophytes belonging to Exiguobacterium were recovered through conventional plating and isolation.

Pot experiments were conducted to assess the capability of these bacteria to promote the growth of another tailing pioneer plant, B. pilosa L. (Fig. 4A). Three treatments with inoculated bacteria (i.e., Rhi.Inoc., Pseu.Inoc., and Mix.Inoc) significantly increased the shoot fresh weight of B. pilosa compared to the unamended control (Fig. 4B). In addition, inoculation of P. Y-5, R. G-14, or both cultures resulted in a significant increase of root/shoot N contents (Fig. 4C). Finally, 15N2 enrichment incubation and RT-qPCR of the transcribed nifH gene in shoots and roots of B. pilosa provided direct evidence demonstrating the promotion of N fixation by amending the diazotrophic endophytes: higher δ15N values were observed in the three inoculated treatments than those that did not receive amendments (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, RT-qPCR confirmed the expression of the bacterial nitrogenases in the roots and shoots of B. pilosa, since the copies of the transcribed nifH gene increased significantly in the shoots and roots of B. pilosa obtained from the inoculant treatments (i.e., Rhi.Inoc., Pseu.Inoc., and Mix.Inoc.) compared to their counterparts in the control treatment (Fig. 4E).

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Pictures of seedlings of Bidens pilosa L. with different treatments. B Effects of isolated strain inoculation on fresh weight, C nitrogen content, and D 15 N abundance. Comparison of the nifH transcript level of the diazotrophs among the different treatments in root and shoot E. Values are given as a mean of 3 independent biological replicates, and the bars represent standard error. ANOVA with an LSD test (p < 0.05) indicated statistically significant differences denoted by different letters for each assessed parameter

Full size image

Microbial community characterization of rhizosphere and root endosphere of B. pilosa L. was performed to verify the colonization of the amended bacteria. Based on the PERMANOVA analysis, inoculation treatments affected the bacterial community compositions in the rhizosphere (PERMANOVA, R = 0.388, p < 0.01, Figure S8A) and root endosphere (PERMANOVA, R = 0.69, p < 0.01, Figure S8B). Notably, the inoculation of amended bacteria significantly increased their abundance in the rhizosphere and root endosphere. For example, the relative abundances of Pseudomonas reached ~ 1.9% and ~ 12.6% in the rhizosphere and root endosphere of Pse.Inoc., respectively, while the relative abundances were only ~ 0.04% and ~ 0.84% in their control counterparts, respectively (Fig. 5A–C). The relative abundances of Rhizobium reached ~ 0.35% and ~ 2.25% in the rhizosphere and root endosphere of Rhi.Inoc., respectively, while the relative abundances were only ~ 0.07% and ~ 0.57% in their control counterparts, respectively (Fig. 5A, B, D). In addition, Mix.Inoc. significantly increased Rhizobium and Pseudomonas abundances in the rhizosphere and root endosphere. The increase of these amended bacteria in the two root-associated compartments, especially in the root endosphere, provided evidence of bacterial colonization. qPCR assay further confirmed that three treatments (Pse.Inoc., Rhi.Inoc., and Mix.Inoc.) significantly increased the abundances of Pseudomonas (Figure S9A, B, C) and Rhizobium (Figure S9D, E, F) in the rhizosphere and root/shoot endosphere compared to their control counterparts, supporting the colonization of these amended bacteria.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Composition of the bacterial community in the A rhizosphere and B root endosphere at the genus level. Arrows highlight the Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. Comparison of the distribution of C Pseudomonas and D Rhizobium among the different treatments. Values are given as a mean of 3 independent biological replicates, and the bars represent standard error. ANOVA with an LSD test (p < 0.05) indicated statistically significant differences denoted by different letters for each assessed parameter

Full size image

Discussion

Vegetation on tailings is a promising bioremediation strategy to attenuate the contamination introduced by mine tailings. However, nitrogen (N) is one of the major limiting nutrients inhibiting plant growth in tailings [45]. Diazotrophic endophytes have the potential to provide the fixed N to improve the growth of host plants and promote the growth of pioneer plants in tailings and thus facilitate tailing vegetation. To verify such this hypothesis, putative diazotrophic endophytes in M. sinensis, a pioneer plant commonly detected in mine tailings, were identified and isolated. Further, their effects to promote the plants in mine tailings were examined.

Putative diazotrophic endophytes as the keystone taxa of M. sinensis

M. sinensis is a pioneering plant that can thrive in metal-contaminated sites and holds the potential for phytoremediation applications [34, 46]. It is suggested that the endosphere microbiome of M. sinensis can provide critical environmental services, such as metal resistance and plant growth promotion, to support the survival of the host plant in mine tailings [20, 47]. This study characterized the endospheric microbiome of M. sinensis from four mine tailings (HC) and less contaminated (LC) sites. Particularly, the keystone taxa of M. sinensis were identified. The host-associated keystone taxa were referred to native microbial populations that were essential for the host biological functions [48]. Keystone taxa have been widely used to decipher the host-microbe interactions in different host-microbe ecosystems such as the mammalian guts or the plant roots [49, 50]. Identification of the keystone taxa of the meta–organism (i.e., M. sinensis) enabled the prediction of metabolic functions and core pathways provided by the host-microbe interaction [51]. Different bacterial taxa were dominant in the HC and LC soils. Herbaspirillum, Lechevalieria, Rhizobium, Luteimonas, Devosia, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, and Delftia were dominant in highly contaminated tailing samples. Notably, most of these have previously been reported as diazotrophic bacteria [52, 53]. Consistently, significantly higher relative abundances of the nifH gene were observed in the root endosphere of HC samples than those of LC samples (Figure S6). These observations suggest the critical role of diazotrophic bacteria in the endosphere of M. sinensis.

Putative diazotrophic endophytes identified by DNA-SIP

Subsequently, DNA-SIP was conducted to identify diazotrophic endophytes of M. sinensis. Accordingly, three bacteria affiliated with Exiguobacterium, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium were identified as putative diazotrophic endophytes. Notably, two of these putative diazotrophic endophytes (i.e., Pseudomonas and Rhizobium) were identified as the keystone taxa in HC, indicating that N fixation may be an important metabolic trait of the endospheric microbiome of M. sinensis. Further, metagenomic-binning indicated that all these bacteria taxa contained the essential nif gene cluster for N fixation. In addition, MAGs associated with these three bacteria contained genes for plant growth promotion such as phosphate solubilization function, siderophores and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production, acetoin/butanediol synthesis, and metal resistance. These three bacteria taxa have previously been demonstrated with the capability for N fixation and plant growth promotion. For example, members of Exiguobacterium have been identified as nodule-associated bacteria from the root nodules of Fenugreek plant and showed their potential for N fixation [54]. Pseudomonas lurida EOO26, isolated from Odontarrhena obovate grown in the Cu contaminated soil, presented drought resistance, multi-metal tolerance, and exhibited PGP attributes including siderophore, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC-) deaminase, and ammonia production [55]. In addition, as a potential plant for phytoremediation, M. sinensis might cause potential loss of soil N and P in its early and middle growth stages [34]. In this study, the identified diazotrophic endophytes also had P-solubilizing potential, further demonstrating the key role of diazotrophic endophytes in the nutrient uptake of M. sinensis.

Plant growth promotion by diazotrophic endophytes

Previous studies suggested that diazotrophic endophytes can promote the growth of plants and thus increase crop yields [56]. Therefore, it is suggested that the diazotrophic endophytes of M. sinensis may also promote the growth of host plants inhabiting mine tailings. Accordingly, bacteria were isolated from the root extracts of M. sinensis to verify whether the endospheric bacteria can facilitate the BNF and promote plant growth. Two isolates (i.e., Pseudomonas sp. Y-5 and Rhizobium sp. G-14) closely related to the putative diazotrophic endophytes identified by DNA-SIP were obtained, and their capability to promote plant growth was tested and verified subsequently. Another pioneer plant, B. pilosa., was selected as a model plant in this study because it was frequently detected in mine tailings with the capability for rapid growth [57]. Pure isolates of Pseudomonas and Rhizobium were inoculated to the sterile mine tailing soils in which B. pilosa was planted. The addition of Pseudomonas and Rhizobium significantly improved the growth of B. pilosa (Fig. 4). All measured parameters, including length, fresh weight, and N content,were significantly higher in plants amended by Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, and the mixture of Pseudomonas and Rhizobium than their control counterparts. Moreover, significantly higher 15 N contents were observed in the roots and shoots of B. pilosa in three 15N2-fed treatments amended by these two isolates or their mixture than their control counterparts. This suggests that more bioavailable 15 N was produced by the diazotrophic endophytes via BNF, and the plants subsequently utilized bioavailable 15 N. In addition, the relative abundances of the nifH transcripts were higher in the shoots and roots of three treatments amended by bacteria than controls, suggesting that nitrogenase gene expression was stimulated after amending these bacteria. Therefore, the amendment of diazotrophic endophytes substantially enhanced the BNF, further promoting the growth of B. pilosa.

A combination of qPCR and the amplicon-based metagenomic study was performed to assess the ability of these diazotrophic endophytes to colonize internal plant tissues. qPCR and 16S rRNA-based microbial community analyses revealed significantly higher relative abundances of Pseudomonas and Rhizobium in the rhizosphere and endosphere of treatments amended by Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, respectively (Fig. 5). Successful colonization of exogenous plant-growth-promoting bacteria was reported to play a critical role in promoting plant growth [58]. Host plants likely have different mechanisms to recruit bacterial endophytes (please see “Results” section for more information [59,60,61]). However, there are still unknown mechanisms for the recruitment of diazotrophic endophytes by tailing pioneer plants. Such information is important because it may provide guidance to improve the colonization of diazotrophs and thus promote plant growth. Plants can release photosynthates or exudates from their roots, which can initiate early communication between plants and bacterial endophytes that consequently steers the colonization process [62,63,64]. Unfortunately, it was impractical to detect photosynthates or exudates in this study due to the small amount of tailing samples, most of which were used for DNA extraction and isotope analysis. Moreover, bacterial quorum sensing may contribute to colonization [59]. A recent study showed that a quorum-sensing mutant of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN could not efficiently colonize Arabidopsis thaliana and did not increase its growth [65]. In this study, both the Pseudomonas and Rhizobium-associated MAGs harbor the quorum-sensing system regulator gene LuxR (Fig. 3B), implying that these bacteria may have the potential for quorum sensing.

The exopolysaccharides (EPS) synthesized by bacterial cells may promote root surface attachment and colonization [66, 67]. For example, mutations in the EPS synthesis gene reduced the colonization efficiency of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. However, colonization ability was rescued by the external addition of wild-type produced EPS [68]. Both the Pseudomonas and Rhizobium MAGs contained essential genes to produce EPS, suggesting their biofilm formation and plant colonization capabilities. Detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) frequently occurs during the early stage of endophyte colonization [69]. ROS-deactivating genes, superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase, were substantially expressed by the diazotrophic endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus during the early stages of rice root colonization [70]. The current study also detected ROS-deactivating genes in MAGs associated with Pseudomonas and Rhizobium. Taking all these observations together, the potential to deactivate ROS, produce EPS, and interact through quorum sensing may contribute to plant colonization by Pseudomonas and Rhizobium. It is worth noting that the detection of these genes does not guarantee that they perform the corresponding functions in plants. Further in planta experiments is necessary to reveal paths and mechanisms of B. pilosa to recruit these bacteria.

Conclusions

Diazotrophic endophytes can promote plant growth, particularly those growing in oligotrophic environments such as mine tailings. A combination of field microbial community characterization, DNA-SIP analysis, and pot experiments suggested that diazotrophic endophytes can promote the growth of pioneer plants in mine tailings. It is suggested that several diazotrophic endophytes, especially the bacteria of the genera Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, can promote the pioneer plants growing mine tailings. Essential genes for plant growth promotion and nitrogen fixation were found in MAGs associated with these two bacterial isolates, suggesting their metabolic potential to promote plant growth.

The pot experiment indicated that the amendment of Rhizobium sp. G-14 and Pseudomonas sp. Y-5, two diazotrophic endophytes isolated from M. sinensis, can promote the growth of another pioneer plant B. pilosa growing in mine tailings. The 15 N isotope analysis and quantification of nifH transcription demonstrated the amendment of these bacteria significantly increased the activity of N fixation in plants and subsequently increased the plant growth. Microbial community analysis indicated that these two bacteria enriched within the rhizosphere, and colonize within endosphere of B. pilosa. Metagenomic-binning suggested that some genes responsible for quorum sensing, EPS formation, and ROS detoxification were detected in MAGs associated with Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, suggesting that these bacteria may use these mechanisms for plant colonization. In addition to pot experiments, field-scale experiments are expected to verify the capability of diazotrophic endophytes to promote M. sinensis in actual mine tailings. Importantly, M. sinensis has been considered for bioenergy production [33, 71], this research may not only increase phytoremediation efficiency but also promote bioenergy production development on contaminated soils. In conclusion, our findings revealed that the specialized keystone taxa participate in BNF, which provides an excellent opportunity to apply these keystone taxa as microbial agents for tailings bioremediation.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data have been submitted to the NCBI database for public use (accession no PRJNA818089).

Change history

References

  1. Ceniceros-Gómez AE, Macías-Macías KY, de la Cruz-Moreno JE, Gutiérrez-Ruiz ME, Martínez-Jardines LG. Characterization of mining tailings in México for the possible recovery of strategic elements. J S Am Earth Sci. 2018;88:72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adiansyah JS, Rosano M, Vink S, Keir G. A framework for a sustainable approach to mine tailings management: disposal strategies. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:1050–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babel S, Chauhan R, Ali N, Yadav V. Preparation of phosphate mine tailings and low grade rock phosphate enriched bio-fertilizer. J Sci Ind Res India. 2016.

  4. Li Y, Gao P, Sun X, Li B, Guo L, Yang R, et al. Primary succession changes the composition and functioning of the protist community on mine tailings, especially phototrophic protists. ACS Environmental Au. 2022.

  5. Sun X, Kong T, Li F, Häggblom MM, Kolton M, Lan L, et al. Desulfurivibrio spp. mediate sulfur-oxidation coupled to Sb(V) reduction, a novel biogeochemical process. ISME J. 2022;16(6):1547–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan H, Zhou G, Cheng Z, Yang R, He L, Zeng D, et al. Advances in geochemical survey of mine tailings project in China. J Geochem Explor. 2014;139:193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah V, Daverey A. Phytoremediation: a multidisciplinary approach to clean up heavy metal contaminated soil. Environ Technol Inno. 2020;18: 100774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muthusaravanan S, Sivarajasekar N, Vivek J, Paramasivan T, Naushad M, Prakashmaran J, et al. Phytoremediation of heavy metals: mechanisms, methods and enhancements. Environ Chem Lett. 2018;16(4):1339–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cary TJ, Rylott EL, Zhang L, Routsong RM, Palazzo AJ, Strand SE, et al. Field trial demonstrating phytoremediation of the military explosive RDX by XplA/XplB-expressing switchgrass. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(10):1216–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodríguez N, Amils R, Jiménez-Ballesta R, Rufo L, de la Fuente V. Heavy metal content in Erica andevalensis: an endemic plant from the extreme acidic environment of Tinto River and its soils. Arid Land Res Manag. 2007;21(1):51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rufo L, de la Fuente V. Successional dynamics of the climatophile vegetation of the mining territory of the Río Tinto Basin (Huelva, Spain): soil characteristics and implications for phytoremediation. Arid Land Res Manag. 2010;24(4):301–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang JL, Liu J, Jia P, Yang TT, Zeng QW, Zhang SC, et al. Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining. ISME J. 2020;14(6):1600–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Guo L, Häggblom MM, Yang R, Li M, Sun X, et al. Serratia spp. are responsible for nitrogen fixation fueled by As(III) oxidation, a novel biogeochemical process identified in mine tailings. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56(3):2033–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang L-N, Tang F-Z, Song Y-S, Wan C-Y, Wang S-L, Liu W, et al. Biodiversity, abundance, and activity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria during primary succession on a copper mine tailings. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;78(3):439–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moynahan OS, Zabinski CA, Gannon JE. Microbial community structure and carbon-uilization diversity in a mne tailings revegetation study. Restor Ecol. 2002;10(1):77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Lin H, Gao P, Yang N, Xu R, Sun X, et al. Synergistic impacts of arsenic and antimony co-contamination on diazotrophic communities. Microb Ecol. 2022;84(1):44–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Zhang M, Xu R, Lin H, Sun X, Xu F, et al. Arsenic and antimony co-contamination influences on soil microbial community composition and functions: Relevance to arsenic resistance and carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling. Environ Int. 2021;153: 106522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li Y, Lin H, Gao P, Yang N, Xu R, Sun X, et al. Variation in the diazotrophic community in a vertical soil profile contaminated with antimony and arsenic. Environ Pollut. 2021;291: 118248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun X, Kong T, Häggblom MM, Kolton M, Li F, Dong Y, et al. Chemolithoautotropic diazotrophy dominates the nitrogen fixation process in mine tailings. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(10):6082–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun X, Song B, Xu R, Zhang M, Gao P, Lin H, et al. Root-associated (rhizosphere and endosphere) microbiomes of the Miscanthus sinensis and their response to the heavy metal contamination. J Environ Sci. 2021;104:387–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carvalho TL, Balsemão-Pires E, Saraiva RM, Ferreira PC, Hemerly AS. Nitrogen signalling in plant interactions with associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(19):5631–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(4):435–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. Life in grasses: diazotrophic endophytes. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6(4):139–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B, Van Montagu M, Kellenberger E. Root colonization and systemic spreading of Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 in grasses. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(7):1913–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Suman A, Gaur A, Shrivastava AK, Yadav RL. Improving sugarcane growth and nutrient uptake by inoculating Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Plant Growth Regul. 2005;47(2):155–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riggs PJ, Chelius M, Iniguez AL, Kaeppler S, Triplett E. Enhanced maize productivity by inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria. Funct Plant Biol. 2001;28(9):829–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Terakado-Tonooka J, Ohwaki Y, Yamakawa H, Tanaka F, Yoneyama T, Fujihara S. Expressed nifH genes of endophytic bacteria detected in field-grown sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L.). Microbes Environ. 2008;23(1):89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rothballer M, Schmid M, Hartmann A. Diazotrophic bacterial endophytes in Gramineaeand other plants. Prokaryotic symbionts in plants. 2007: 273–302.

  29. Knoth JL, Kim SH, Ettl GJ, Doty SL. Biological nitrogen fixation and biomass accumulation within poplar clones as a result of inoculations with diazotrophic endophyte consortia. New Phytol. 2014;201(2):599–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kandel S, Herschberger N, Kim S-H, Doty S. Diazotrophic endophytes of poplar and willow for growth promotion of rice plants in nitrogen-limited conditions. Crop Sci. 2015;55(4):1765–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sevilla M, Burris RH, Gunapala N, Kennedy C. Comparison of benefit to sugarcane plant growth and 15N2 incorporation following inoculation of sterile plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus wild-type and nif mutant strains. Mol Plant Microbe in. 2001;14(3):358–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan Z, Guelich G, Phan H, Redman R, Doty S. Bacterial and yeast endophytes from poplar and willow promote growth in crop plants and grasses. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012.

  33. Stewart JR, Toma Y, Fernandez FG, Nishiwaki A, Yamada T, Bollero G. The ecology and agronomy of Miscanthus sinensis, a species important to bioenergy crop development, in its native range in Japan: a review. Gcb Bioenergy. 2009;1(2):126–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao A, Gao L, Chen B, Feng L. Phytoremediation potential of miscanthus sinensis for mercury-polluted sites and its impacts on soil microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2019;26(34):34818–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Y, Wang M, Chen S. Application of N2-fixing Paenibacillus triticisoli BJ-18 changes the compositions and functions of the bacterial, diazotrophic, and fungal microbiomes in the rhizosphere and root/shoot endosphere of wheat under field conditions. Biol Fert Soils. 2021;57(3):347–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Yang R, Guo L, Gao W, Su P, Xu Z, et al. The composition, biotic network, and assembly of plastisphere protistan taxonomic and functional communities in plastic-mulching croplands. J Hazard Mater. 2022;430: 128390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Custer J. Separation of viable microbes from soil matrices. 2019.

  38. Morono Y, Terada T, Kallmeyer J, Inagaki F. An improved cell separation technique for marine subsurface sediments: applications for high-throughput analysis using flow cytometry and cell sorting. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15(10):2841–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McNees CR, Law AD, Moe LA. Characterization of endophytic microbial communities in store-bought kale evaluated by different plant tissue homogenization methods. Phytobiomes J. 2020;4(3):211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Li Y, Li Q, Chen S. Diazotroph Paenibacillus triticisoli BJ-18 drives the variation in bacterial, diazotrophic and fungal communities in the rhizosphere and root/shoot endosphere of maize. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu X, Li Q, Li Y, Guan G, Chen S. Paenibacillus strains with nitrogen fixation and multiple beneficial properties for promoting plant growth. PeerJ. 2019;7: e7445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu A, Ju F, Hou L, Li J, Yang X, Wang H, et al. Strong impact of anthropogenic contamination on the co-occurrence patterns of a riverine microbial community. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(12):4993–5009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang M, Kolton M, Li Z, Lin H, Li F, Lu G, et al. Bacteria responsible for antimonite oxidation in antimony-contaminated soil revealed by DNA-SIP coupled to metagenomics. Fems Microbiol Ecol. 2021;97(5):fiab057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jiang H, Zhao X, Fang J, Xiao Y. Physiological responses and metal uptake of Miscanthus under cadmium/arsenic stress. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2018;25(28):28275–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang C-L, Sarkar R, Hsu T-W, Yang C-F, Chien C-H, Chang W-C, et al. Endophytic microbiome of biofuel plant Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae) interacts with environmental gradients. Microb Ecol. 2020;80(1):133–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Risely A. Applying the core microbiome to understand host–microbe systems. J Anim Ecol. 2020;89(7):1549–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457(7228):480–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pfeiffer S, Mitter B, Oswald A, Schloter-Hai B, Schloter M, Declerck S, et al. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated in the High Andes show stable and dynamic core microbiomes with different responses to plant development. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93(2):fiw242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shafquat A, Joice R, Simmons SL, Huttenhower C. Functional and phylogenetic assembly of microbial communities in the human microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(5):261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gulati A, Sood S, Rahi P, Thakur R, Devi S, Chawla I. Diversity analysis of diazotrophic bacteria associated with the roots of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). J Microbiol Biotechn. 2011;21(6):545–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Jha PN, Gomaa AB, Yanni YG, El-Saadany AY, Stedtfeld TM, Stedtfeld RD, et al. Alterations in the endophyte-enriched root-associated microbiome of rice receiving growth-promoting treatments of urea fertilizer and Rhizobium biofertilizer. Microb Ecol. 2020;79(2):367–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rajendran G, Patel MH, Joshi SJ. Isolation and characterization of nodule-associated Exiguobacterium sp. from the root nodules of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) and their possible role in plant growth promotion. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012.

  55. Kumar A, Tripti, Voropaeva O, Maleva M, Panikovskaya K, Borisova G, et al. Bioaugmentation with copper tolerant endophyte Pseudomonas lurida strain EOO26 for improved plant growth and copper phytoremediation by Helianthus annuus. Chemosphere. 2021;266:128983.

  56. Li Y, Li Y, Zhang H, Wang M, Chen S. Diazotrophic Paenibacillus beijingensis BJ-18 provides nitrogen for plant and promotes plant growth, nitrogen uptake and metabolism. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hou X, Liu S, Zhao S, Beazley R, Cheng F, Wu X, et al. Selection of suitable species as a key factor for vegetation restoration of degraded areas in an open-pit manganese-ore mine in Southern China using multivariate-analysis methods. Land Degrad Dev. 2019;30(8):942–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE. Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot. 2013;100(9):1738–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kandel SL, Joubert PM, Doty SL. Bacterial endophyte colonization and distribution within plants. Microorganisms. 2017;5(4):77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN. Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42(5):669–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kawasaki A, Donn S, Ryan PR, Mathesius U, Devilla R, Jones A, et al. Microbiome and exudates of the root and rhizosphere of Brachypodium distachyon, a model for wheat. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10): e0164533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Pétriacq P, Williams A, Cotton A, McFarlane AE, Rolfe SA, Ton J. Metabolite profiling of non-sterile rhizosphere soil. Plant J. 2017;92(1):147–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, van Themaat EVL, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature. 2012;488(7409):91–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Zúñiga A, Poupin MJ, Donoso R, Ledger T, Guiliani N, Gutiérrez RA, et al. Quorum sensing and indole-3-acetic acid degradation play a role in colonization and plant growth promotion of Arabidopsis thaliana by Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. Mol Plant Microbe in. 2013;26(5):546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Meneses CH, Rouws LF, Simões-Araújo JL, Vidal MS, Baldani JI. Exopolysaccharide production is required for biofilm formation and plant colonization by the nitrogen-fixing endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Mol Plant Microbe in. 2011;24(12):1448–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Janczarek M, Rachwał K, Cieśla J, Ginalska G, Bieganowski A. Production of exopolysaccharide by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii and its role in bacterial attachment and surface properties. Plant Soil. 2015;388(1):211–227.

  68. Meneses C, Gonçalves T, Alquéres S, Rouws L, Serrato R, Vidal M, et al. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus exopolysaccharide protects bacterial cells against oxidative stress in vitro and during rice plant colonization. Plant Soil. 2017;416(1):133–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Tripathy BC, Oelmüller R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(12):1621–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Alquéres S, Meneses C, Rouws L, Rothballer M, Baldani I, Schmid M, et al. The bacterial superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase are crucial for endophytic colonization of rice roots by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAL5. Mol Plant Microbe in. 2013;26(8):937–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Quinn LD, Allen DJ, Stewart JR. Invasiveness potential of Miscanthus sinensis: implications for bioenergy production in the United States. GCB Bioenergy. 2010;2(6):310–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32161143018, U21A2035, 42107133, and 42107285), GDAS’ Project of Science and Technology Development (Grant Nos. 2022GDASZH-2022010106, 2021GDASYL-20210103048, 2020GDASYL-20200102018, and 2019GDASYL-0102002–1), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded Project (Grant No. 2021M690745), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2021A1515011374), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (Grant No. 201904010366), Guangdong Foundation for Program of Science and Technology Research (Grant No. 2019B121205006), Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents (Grant No. 2017GC010570), US Department of Agriculture (USDA, Grant No. NIFA-2019–67020-30475).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yongbin Li and Rui Yang contributed equally to this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Integrated Agro-Environmental Pollution Control and Management, Institute of Eco-Environmental and Soil Sciences, National-Regional Joint Engineering Research Center for Soil Pollution Control and Remediation in South China, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510650, China

    Yongbin Li, Rui Yang, Lifang Guo, Baoqin Li, Max Kolton, Wenlong Gao, Bei Yan & Weimin Sun

  2. Joint Laboratory for Environmental Pollution and Control, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China

    Yongbin Li, Max Kolton, Wenlong Gao, Bei Yan & Weimin Sun

  3. Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA

    Max M. Häggblom

  4. Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA

    Mengyan Li

  5. French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

    Max Kolton

  6. School of Environment, Key Laboratory of Yellow River and Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China

    Zhiguo Cao

  7. Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

    Mohsen Soleimani

  8. Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, 215123, China

    Zheng Chen

  9. Engineering and Technology Research Center for Agricultural Land Pollution Prevention and Control of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, College of Resources and Environment, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, 510225, China

    Zhimin Xu

Authors
  1. Yongbin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Max M. Häggblom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lifang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Baoqin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Max Kolton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhiguo Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mohsen Soleimani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhimin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Wenlong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Weimin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.Y. conceived and designed the experiment with input from S.W.; L.Y., M.H., L.M., M.K., and S.W. acquired the funding needed to conduct the project. Y.R., G.L., L.B., G.W., and Y.B. performed the field sampling and laboratory analyses. L.Y. and Y.R. performed the data analysis. L.Y. led writing the manuscript with close consultation with M.H., L.M., M.K., C.Z., S.M., C.Z., X.Z., and S.W. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weimin Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: "The ninth authors family name should be Soleimani”.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The chemical properties of sample sites. Table S2. Node table for biotic interaction network in the less contaminatedsites. Table S3. Edge table for biotic interaction network in the lesscontaminated sites. Table S4. Node table for biotic interaction network in thehigh contaminated sites. Table S5. Edge table for biotic interaction network inthe high contaminated sites. 

Additional file 2:

 The methods of "Extraction of root endophyticmicroorganisms", "SIP gradient fractionation", "Shotgunmetagenome sequencing", and "Growth promotion potential of isolateddiazotrophs". Figure S1. Overview of the experimental design employing acombination of field study, DNA-SIP, and pot experiment. Figure S2. Samplinglocations for pioneer plant M. sinensis in southern China. Figure S3. Theassays of checking root surface sterilization. Figure S4. Experimental design ofBidens pilosa L. plants grown in the 50 mL serum tube sealed with septa. Figure S5. Comparison of the distribution of the different phyla between lowcontaminated and the high contaminated sites. Figure S6. The relative abundanceof nifH/16S rRNA genes in the low contaminated and the high contaminatedsites. Figure S7. The isolated diazotrophic strains. Figure S8. The PCoA plots ofbeta similarities measured as Bray-Curtis distances for bacterial community inthe rhizosphere and root endosphere. Figure S9. Comparison of the relativeabundances of Pseudomonas and Rhizobium among differenttreatments in rhizosphere, root, and shoot using qPCR. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Yang, R., Häggblom, M.M. et al. Characterization of diazotrophic root endophytes in Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis). Microbiome 10, 186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01379-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01379-9

Keywords

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us