Skip to main content
Download PDF

Androgen-induced gut dysbiosis disrupts glucolipid metabolism and endocrinal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome

Microbiome volume 9, Article number: 101 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a common reproductive endocrinal disorder, are high incidence, complicated aetiology and poor therapeutic effects. PCOS patients frequently exhibit gut dysbiosis; however, its roles in the regulation of metabolic and endocrinal balances in PCOS pathophysiology are not clear.

Results

In this study, gut dysbiosis was reproduced in dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-induced PCOS-like rats. An antibiotic cocktail was used to eliminate gut microbiota during DHEA treatment; however, depletion of the gut microbiota did not prevent the occurrence of PCOS phenotypes in DHEA-treated rats. DHEA-shaped gut microbiota transplanted to pseudo germ-free recipients trigged disturbances in hepatic glucolipid metabolism and reproductive hormone imbalance. The clinical features of PCOS may be correlated with the relative abundance of gut microbes and the levels of faecal metabolites in faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) recipient rats.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that androgen-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis may aggravate metabolic and endocrinal malfunction in PCOS.

Video Abstract

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent reproductive endocrine disorder in women. It is characterised by irregular menses, infertility and hirsutism due to chronic oligo-anovulation and an excess of androgen. Owing to its relatively high prevalence (~ 6−20%), PCOS places heavy social and economic burdens on patients [1, 2]. Subsequent morbidities, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD), endometrial carcinoma, pregnancy complications and depression significantly threaten patients’ physical and mental health and exert a far-reaching influence on their quality of life.

Currently, the 2003 Rotterdam Consensus is one of the most widely accepted diagnostic criteria for PCOS. It requires the presence of 2 or more of chronic anovulation, biochemical or clinical hyperandrogenism, or polycystic ovary morphology to establish PCOS. Coviello et al. reported that PCOS adolescents had a higher risk of metabolic syndromes related to hyperandrogenism regardless of insulin resistance and obesity [3]. Therefore, hyperandrogenism is considered a critical factor in both impaired follicular development and metabolic disorders in PCOS. However, it is still not completely understood how hyperandrogenism leads to increased PCOS metabolic syndrome susceptibility.

In the last 2 decades, the gut microbiota has emerged as an internal environmental factor closely related to human health. The colonisation of the gastrointestinal tract by enteric microorganisms leads to the participation of microbes in various physiological processes in the human body. Many studies have revealed that gender plays an important role in the composition of gut microbiota [4, 5]. The alpha diversity of gut microbiota is higher in females than in males [6, 7], with the divergence beginning at the onset of puberty in both humans and rodents, indicating that sex hormones induce compositional changes in the gut microbiome [8, 9]. Additionally, the gut microbiome is associated with the host metabolism. The microbial communities in individuals with obesity, T2DM and CVD were distinct from healthy counterparts [10,11,12]. Studies showed that faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) led to the obese phenotype in germ-free mice. This finding added evidence to the causative role of the microbial community in the development of metabolic disorders [13].

The gut microbiome in PCOS patients shows an altered diversity, distinct species relative abundances and shifted functional enrichments [14,15,16]. Our previous study identified species-level differentially abundant microbes and found correlations between these metagenomic species and clinical parameters such as body mass index, serum testosterone (T), luteinising hormone (LH) and anti-Müllerian hormone levels [17]. Alterations in gut microbiota were often associated with hyperandrogenism and metabolic markers [16, 18]. The administration of pro- or prebiotics improved both reproductive and metabolic phenotypes, suggesting that the gut microbiome might be involved in PCOS pathogenesis [19, 20]. Recently, it was reported that gut microbiota transplantation from PCOS patients to animals could result in glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and a reduced number of pups in the first litter. It suggests that the gut microbiota plays a causal role in PCOS development. However, gut dysbiosis may be the result of numerous factors, such as hyperandrogenism, metabolic disorders or various lifestyle choices. Due to the genetic and environmental homogeneity of rats, the androgen-treated rat model helps to reveal the role of gut microbiota in the development of androgen-induced PCOS phenotypes. In this study, the dysbiosis of gut microbiota was validated in androgen-induced PCOS-like rats. Then, a PCOS-like animal model was established in pseudo germ-free rats. Finally, an androgen-shaped gut microbiome was transplanted to the pseudo germ-free rats to investigate the effects of the disrupted gut microbial community on the host. The potential mechanism underlying these processes was also discussed.

Results

DHEA-induced metabolic, ovarian and endocrinal disorders in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats

To induce a PCOS-like model, SD rats were injected subcutaneously with DHEA (6 mg/100 g bodyweight) daily for 35 days in the DHEA group, while control rats were injected with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). During the 5-week treatment, the weight of the DHEA-treated rats was similar to their PBS-treated counterparts (Fig. 1a) and the levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG) were similar between groups (Fig. 1b). Compared with PBS-treated rats, the DHEA-treated rats displayed higher glucose intolerance (Fig. 1c, d) and disrupted oestrous cycles (Fig. 1e). Ovaries from the PBS group contained follicles at different stages of development and several corpora lutea (CL). In contrast, those from the DHEA group showed multiple cyst-like follicles with collapsed walls and fewer CL (Fig. 1f). In addition, the levels of total testosterone (TT), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), free androgen index (FAI), and LH were elevated in the DHEA-treated rats (Fig. 1g–j). The increased TT and FAI verified the efficiency of DHEA administration and the successful development of hyperandrogenic rats. However, no differences were observed in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels or the LH/FSH ratio (Fig. 1k, l). These results validate the successful establishment of a PCOS-like rat model with disorders in metabolism, ovarian morphology, and endocrine function.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DHEA-induced glucose metabolism, ovarian morphology, and reproductive hormone level alterations in conventional and antibiotic-treated rats. a Bodyweight, b FBG, c GTT, d area under the curve of GTT, e oestrous cycle examination and f H&E staining of representative ovaries. * indicates CL, and cyst-like follicles are indicated by #. Black arrows indicate normal granulosa cell layers. Red arrows indicate attenuated granulosa cell layers. Scale bar = 1000 μm (left) and 200 μm (right). g serum TT levels, h serum SHBG levels, i FAI, j serum LH levels, k serum FSH levels and l LH:FSH ratio, DHEA + ABX, DHEA + antibiotics. Data are given as mean ± SEM. n = 6 rats per group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

Hyperandrogenism in female SD rats was accompanied by gut microbiota dysbiosis

Faecal samples of PBS- and DHEA-treated rats were sequenced using the Illumina-MiSeq platform. Regarding alpha diversity, the phylogenetic diversity (PD) whole tree index significantly decreased in the gut microbiota of DHEA-treated rats compared with those of PBS-treated ones (Additional file 1: Figure S1a). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the unweighted UniFrac distance did not show significant differences in clustering in faecal samples between the DHEA and PBS groups (Additional file 1: Figure S1b). At the genus level, the DHEA group was characterised by the decreased relative abundance of Turicibacter, Anaerofustis and Clostridium sensu stricto (Additional file 1: Figure S1c). From linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis, the genus Turicibacter, family Erysipelotrichaceae, order Erysipelotrichales, class Erysipelotrichia was top-ranking by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score in contributing to sample separation between groups (Additional file 1: Figure S1d, e).

DHEA-induced PCOS-like phenotype in pseudo germ-free rats

Rats in both the DHEA group and DHEA + antibiotics group were injected subcutaneously with 6 mg/100 g bodyweight DHEA daily for 35 days. During this period, to establish pseudo germ-free rats, rats in the DHEA + antibiotics group received a freshly prepared antibiotic cocktail (ABX) containing 1 mg mL−1 ampicillin sodium, 1 mg mL−1 neomycin sulfate, 1 mg mL−1 metronidazole, and 0.5 mg mL−1 vancomycin hydrochloride in drinking water, while rats in the DHEA group were provided with non-acidified drinking water during the establishment of the PCOS model. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to confirm the effects of ABX administration. There was a substantial decrease in alpha diversity in the DHEA + antibiotics group (Additional file 2: Figure S2a, b), indicating that ABX significantly suppressed the gut microbiota. The variation, confirmed by PCoA and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) analyses, was higher between groups than within groups (Additional file 2: Figure S2c, d). These findings demonstrated that the ABX treatment provided a suitable environment for FMT. The body weight, FBG and glucose tolerance were not affected by the clearance of gut microbiota (Fig. 1a–d). Regarding the oestrous cycle, both groups were acyclic (Fig. 1e). Ovarian morphological anomalies, such as cyst-like follicles and thinner granulosa cell layers, were also observed in the DHEA + antibiotics group (Fig. 1f). These data suggest that the lack of a gut microbiome does not affect disorders in glucose metabolism and ovarian function in hyperandrogenic rats. Serum TT, FAI, LH, FSH, and the LH/FSH ratio decreased in the DHEA + antibiotics group compared with the DHEA group (Fig. 1g, i–l). However, serum SHBG remained unchanged between groups (Fig. 1h). The serum levels of reproductive hormones were significantly affected by gut microbiota clearance. In general, the presence of a gut microbial community may not be necessary for the development of the PCOS phenotype in DHEA-treated rats.

Transplantation of DHEA-shaped gut microbiome leads to glucose intolerance, ovarian malfunction and endocrinal disturbance in pseudo germ-free rats

The timeline for the animal experiments with FMT recipients is shown in Fig. 2a. A three-course antibiotic cocktail was used for 27 days to reduce gut microbiota and to establish a pseudo germ-free rat model [21]. After ABX treatment, the gut microbial loads were significantly decreased (Additional file 3: Figure S3a), providing a favourable environment for the FMT. Subsequently, the rats were divided into 2 groups, an FMT recipient from the PBS group (t-PBS, n = 6), and an FMT recipient from the DHEA group (t-DHEA, n = 6). For the following 14 consecutive days, the pseudo germ-free rats in the t-PBS and the t-DHEA groups received a daily gavage of gut microbiota (0.1 g fecal pellet in 1 ml mixture of PBS and skimmed milk) from the PBS- and DHEA-treated rats, respectively. To ensure that recipients received similar volumes of microbes from the FMT donors, microbial loads in both groups of donors were measured and shown in combination in Additional file 3: Figure S3a. During the 27 days of washout and the 14 days of transplantation, the body weight was measured weekly and was found similar between groups (Fig. 2b). No differences in FBG were observed between groups (Fig. 2c). Compared with rats in the t-PBS group, the t-DHEA group displayed increased glucose levels and area under the curve in glucose tolerance tests (GTT) (Fig. 2d, e). These results show that FMT from PCOS-like rats could lead to glucose intolerance in pseudo germ-free rats. Rats receiving faecal microbiota from PBS-treated donors showed normal oestrous cycles, while their counterparts receiving microbiota from DHEA-treated donors exhibited disrupted oestrous cycles (Fig. 2f). The ovaries of t-PBS rats showed follicles at different stages of development and CL. Rats in the t-DHEA group exhibited several cyst-like follicles with attenuated granulosa cell layers and thickened follicle walls (Fig. 2g). Therefore, faecal microbiota from PCOS-like rats disrupts the oestrous cycle and leads to ovarian morphological anomalies in recipients. The TT, SHBG and FAI levels were higher in the t-DHEA group than in the t-PBS group (Fig. 2h–j). The LH levels decreased insignificantly, while the FSH levels were lower in the t-DHEA group than in t-PBS group (Fig. 2k, l). The LH/FSH ratio was unchanged (Fig. 2m). Interestingly, gut dysbiosis in the DHEA-induced PCOS-like rats led to hyperandrogenism in FMT-recipient rats. In general, FMT from the DHEA group induced impaired glucose tolerance, disrupted oestrous cycle, polycystic ovaries and unbalanced reproductive hormones in recipient pseudo germ-free rats, suggesting an important role of gut dysbiosis in the development of PCOS.

Fig. 2
figure 2

DHEA-shaped gut microbiota reproduced glucose intolerance, polycystic ovaries and reproductive hormone disorders in FMT recipients. a Timeline for animal experiments in FMT recipients. Yellow bars represent normal feeding with standard chow and non-acidified drinking water. Other treatments are indicated in the schema. b Bodyweight, c FBG, d GTT, e area under the curve of GTT, f typical oestrous cycles and g H&E staining of typical ovaries. * indicates CL, and cyst-like follicles are indicated by #. Black arrows indicate normal granulosa cell layers. Red arrows indicate attenuated granulosa cell layers. Scale bar = 1000 μm (left) and 200 μm (right). h  serum TT levels, i serum SHBG levels, j FAI, k serum LH levels, l serum FSH levels and m LH:FSH ratio. Data are given as mean ± SEM. n = 6 rats per group. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

Full size image

In the DHEA-treated donors, free circulating DHEA was transformed into dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) by sulfation in the liver and excreted into the gastrointestinal tract. Untargeted metabolomic analysis showed that DHEA was not detected in the faecal samples of either group; however, the DHEA-S levels were elevated in the DHEA-treated donors (Additional file 3: Figure S3b). Elevated faecal DHEA-S levels were also found in PCOS patients [22]. The DHEA-S levels in faecal samples of both groups were quantified (Additional file 3: Figure S3c). Although there was a significant increase in the DHEA-S level in the gut content of DHEA compared with PBS-treated donors, absolute quantification showed that the levels were insignificant in both groups. The DHEA-S levels were 665 ± 63.21 ng/gram of feces in DHEA-treated donors and 109.8 ± 10.11 ng in PBS-treated donors, which are far below the minimal effecting concentration for elicit a PCOS phenotype [23].

Gut microbiome and metabolome were changed in FMT-recipient rats

Faecal samples of the t-PBS and t-DHEA groups were sequenced to confirm the efficiency of FMT and further investigate the underlying mechanisms of FMT induction of the PCOS-like phenotype. Unsurprisingly, the microbial characteristics of DHEA-treated donors reappeared in recipients of FMT from the t-DHEA group. Recipient rats showed a similar alpha diversity index to donor rats (Fig. 3a). Beta diversity analysis revealed that samples from the t-DHEA group formed a distinct cluster from the t-PBS group (Fig. 3b). At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia and Proteobacteria were most abundant in both the donor and recipient groups (Additional file 4: Figure S4a, d). Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Verrucomicrobiae and Bacilli dominated the gut microbiota at the class level in the PBS- and DHEA-treated groups and their recipients (Additional file 4: Figure S4b, e). Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus and Parabacteroides ranked most abundant at the genus level before and after FMT in donors and recipients, respectively (Additional file 4: Figure S4c, f). These differentially abundant taxa were overrepresented in the t-PBS group (Fig. 3c), including the genera Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto, families Erysipelotrichaceae and Clostridiaceae 1, order Erysipelotrichales and class Erysipelotrichia which were also increased in PBS-treated donors. Among these differentially abundant microbes, the genus Turicibacter, family Erysipelotrichaceae, order Erysipelotrichales and class Erysipelotrichia were top-ranking by LDA score in the LEfSe analysis, which coincided with the gut microbiota profiling of donor rats (Fig. 3d, e). SourceTracker analysis (SourceTracker software version 1.0.1) showed that the donors were the principal origin of t-PBS and t-DHEA rat-gut microbiota (Fig. 3f). Thus, the DHEA-shaped gut microbiota was successfully transferred to recipient rats.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gut microbiota profiling of FMT recipient rats. a Phylogenic diversity whole tree index indicating alpha diversity in the 2 groups. b PCoA analysis with unweighted UniFrac distance. Numbers on the axes represent percentages of variation interpreted by that coordinate. c Wilcoxon test identified differentially abundant taxa in gut microbiota after being transferred from PCOS-like rats and controls. Cladogram (d) and bar plot (e) of LEfSe analysis showed taxa contribution to group separation. Taxa with LDA score > 2 were displayed. f Pie chart of SourceTracker analysis revealing percentages of gut microbiota originated from their corresponding donors. g Differentially enriched modules visualised by STAMP. h Heat map of the Spearman’s rho correlation test presenting the association between genus-level microbes and clinical parameters. Red squares represent positive correlations between relative abundances of microbes and clinical parameters; blue squares represent negative correlations. +, p < 0.10; *, p < 0.05. n = 6 rats per group

Full size image

Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was performed using the predicted gene abundance to understand the functional contribution of gut dysbiosis. For module enrichment, the synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies and G protein-coupled receptors were enriched in the t-PBS group, while beta-alanine metabolism, biotin metabolism and mineral absorption were enriched in the t-DHEA group (Fig. 3g). These data suggest that aberrant functions in environment perception, energy, vitamin, amino acid and mineral metabolism may occur in the gut microbiota after DHEA-shaped microbiome transplantation. Then, the correlations of genus-level taxa with clinical parameters were assessed (Fig. 3h). The testosterone level was negatively correlated with the relative abundances of Clostridium sensu stricto, Turicibacter, Olsenella and Anaeroplasma. The FAI was negatively associated with Olsenella levels only. The FSH level was positively associated with Clostridium sensu stricto, Olsenella and other taxa. In addition, the area under the curve of the GTT, and FBG levels were linked with levels of Clostridium sensu stricto, Anaeroplasma, and other taxa.

The faecal metabolome was investigated to further understand the functional alterations following FMT. The top 30 abundant metabolites are displayed in Fig. 4a. The faecal metabolites with significantly different levels between the t-PBS and t-DHEA groups included amino acid metabolites, fatty acids and bile acids (Fig. 4b, c). The levels of 2-hydroxystearic acid, argininosuccinic acid, 1-octen-3-yl primeveroside, daidzein and 4-acetamidobutanoic acid were significantly associated with the relative abundances of Anaeroplasma, Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto (Fig. 4d). Figure 4e displays differentially expressed metabolites which were correlated with at least one clinical parameter. The correlation analyses between each 2 of these metabolites are shown in Fig. 4f. Functional enrichment analysis showed that arginine biosynthesis and alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism were affected by the DHEA-shaped gut microbiota transplantation (Fig. 4g).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Non-target metabolomic analysis of faecal samples in FMT recipient rats. a Heat map presenting top 30 metabolites detected in faecal samples of t-PBS group and t-DHEA group. b Volcano plot of the differentially expressed metabolites. c Boxplot of the upregulated and downregulated metabolites in t-DHEA group. p value of student’s t test and variable importance in the projection score of OPLS-DA were both used to select differentially expressed metabolites. Correlation analysis between metabolites and gut microbes (d), between metabolites and clinical parameters (e) and between each 2 of the differentially expressed metabolites (f). Correlations were determined by Spearman’s rho correlation test or Pearson’s correlation test (+ p < 0.10; p < 0.05). g Bubble plot shows differentially enriched metabolic pathways following distinct gut microbiota transplantation. Each bubble indicates an enriched pathway. Horizontal axis and size of the bubble indicate the impact of the pathway. Vertical axis and colour of the bubble indicate the significance of enrichment. n = 6 rats per group

Full size image

Metabolic phenotypes and genetic changes were characterised in FMT-recipient rat livers

FMT revealed that gut dysbiosis significantly affected metabolic function. The liver serves as the major site for physiological metabolism. Therefore, hepatic genetic expression and morphology were evaluated.

Haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and oil red O (ORO) staining revealed that liver tissue sections in the t-DHEA group contained more and larger lipid droplets than the t-PBS group (Fig. 5a, b). The serum lipid profile was also measured (Fig. 5c). NEFA (non-esterified fatty acids) levels were significantly increased in the t-DHEA group, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TCHO) and triglycerides (TG) were similar between groups. These results suggest abnormal lipid metabolism; thus, hepatic gene expression profiling was performed to gain more insight into the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in the liver. Next-generation sequencing of the liver transcriptome identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) according to the criteria p < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.2. A total of 725 DEGs were selected for subsequent analysis, including 274 upregulated and 451 downregulated genes (Fig. 5d). Canonical pathway analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software revealed that the cholesterol biosynthesis superpathway, LXR/RXR activation and Gαi signalling were upregulated. The downregulated pathways included GP6 signalling, MIF regulation of innate immunity, LPS/IL-1 mediated inhibition of RXR function, MIF-mediated glucocorticoid regulation, endothelin-1 signalling, LPS-stimulated MAPK signalling and 14-3-3-mediated signalling (Fig. 5e). The changes in these pathways indicated that hepatic glucolipid metabolism and immune response were affected by DHEA-shaped gut microbiota transplantation. The interactions between DEGs regarding carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were visualised using IPA (Fig. 5f). Tumour necrosis factor and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 (PTGS2) occupied the centre of the working network. Regulator effects analysis was used to combine upstream regulator analysis and downstream function analysis (Fig. 5g). It indicated that alterations in hepatic gene expression regulated fatty acid concentration, which coincides with dyslipidaemia. These data indicated that the dysregulation of hepatic gene expression might be involved in metabolic derangement triggered by the DHEA-shaped microbiome transplantation.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FMT of DHEA-shaped gut microbiota regulated liver metabolism. Representative photomicrographs revealing hepatic lipid content by H&E staining (a) and ORO staining (b). Scale bar = 25 μm. c Serum lipid levels including HDL-C, LDL-C, NEFA, TCHO, and TG in t-PBS group and t-DHEA group (n = 6 each group, * p < 0.05). Data are given as mean ± SEM. d Heat map of 725 DEGs in livers from t-PBS and t-DHEA groups (n = 3 each group). These data were presented using FPKM values. e Bar plot summarises the significantly influenced canonical pathways regarding metabolism and immunity in rat livers (n = 3 each group). Pathways with Z-score more than 2 (orange) or less than − 2 (blue) were displayed and were ranked by − log(p value). The straight orange line indicates the significance level of p = 0.05. The orange fold line indicates the ratio of enrichment in the pathway. f Network presenting interactions between DEGs involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism (n = 3 each group). Genes are exhibited as red nodes (upregulated) and green nodes (downregulated). Relationships between 2 nodes are indicated as lines (direct interaction) or dotted lines (indirect interaction). g Network displaying regulatory effects from upstream regulators to downstream bio-functions linked by DEGs (n = 3 each group). DEGs, differentially expressed genes; FPKM, Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acid; TCHO, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides

Full size image

Discussion

Although PCOS is a serious health concern worldwide, the limited treatment options primarily focus on the symptoms and therefore yield unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes and long-term metabolic complications, primarily due to a lack of understanding of its aetiology. Gut dysbiosis is characteristic of PCOS patients and rodent models. The manipulation of gut microbiota by FMT, probiotics, prebiotics or symbiotics ameliorates the PCOS phenotype [20, 24]. Recent studies have revealed that gut microbiota shows a close relationship with normal sex hormone levels in rodent models; Yurkovetskiy et al. found that the microbiota of castrated male mice was closer to female mice compared with uncastrated male counterparts, verifying that androgens affect gut microbiota [7]. FMT from males increased the serum T level in immature female recipients, which suggests that gut microbes regulated serum T levels [8]. Therefore, there is a mutual interaction between androgens and the microbial community. However, whether the bidirectional relationship between androgens and the microbiome participates in the development of PCOS is not known. Consequently, the precise role of gut dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of hyperandrogenism-dependent metabolic disorders is worthy of further investigation.

The findings that androgens can induce PCOS phenotypes and gut microbiota disturbance in rodents [19, 25] were validated in DHEA-induced PCOS-like rats. Clinical studies found that the gut microbial composition and relative abundance of taxa were related to PCOS phenotypes [18]. However, it is not clear whether DHEA leads to the PCOS metabolic and endocrinal phenotypes directly or if this process depends on the presence and alteration of the gut microbiota [26]. In this study, antibiotic cocktails were administered to clear the existing gut microbes during model establishment [27]. Zarrinpar et al. found that depletion of the microbiome by antibiotics reduced FBG levels and the GTT glucose surge in normal mice [28]. However, the blood glucose curves showed similarly high levels in the DHEA and DHEA + antibiotics groups, suggesting that hyperandrogenism leads to glucose intolerance independent of the gut microbiome. The clearance of gut microbiota did not avert polycystic morphology induced by DHEA, suggesting that the ovarian anomalies resulting from androgen administration were independent of the gut microbiota. However, the clearance of gut microbiota by ABX decreased serum T level and FAI in the DHEA + antibiotics group. After glucuronidation and sulfation, androgens were excreted by the liver via bile or the kidneys via urine. The glucuronidases and sulfatases synthesised by gut microbes can deconjugate and facilitate the reabsorption of androgens. Decreased serum T levels and FAI may be related to decreased reabsorption and increased excretion of androgens through the gut. The LH and FSH levels and the LH/FSH ratio simultaneously decreased significantly. The relationship between gut microbiota and pituitary gonadotropic hormones has not been elucidated. The concurrent decrease in gonadotropins possibly resulted from suppressed gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) levels in the hypothalamus. A previous study reported that compared with conventional mice, differentially expressed lncRNAs in the hippocampus of germ-free mice were closely associated with GnRH. This finding indicates that the gut microbiota is implicated in gonadotropin regulation. In general, gut microbiota may not play a role in the development of metabolic and ovarian dysfunctions in DHEA-induced PCOS. However, significant alterations in endocrine hormone levels in pseudo germ-free rats indicate an association between gut microbiota and the hypothalamus–pituitary–endocrine gland axes.

Germ-free and pseudo germ-free animals associated with FMT were used to illustrate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and diseases such as intestinal carcinogenesis and irritable bowel syndrome [29, 30]. The relatively long-term impact of androgen-shaped gut microbiota from female donors on pseudo germ-free recipients was studied for the first time by combining ABX and FMT. In this study, the 21-d antibiotic treatment was divided into 3 courses of 7 days with a 2-day interval to prepare the recipient rats for FMT [31]. The microbiota was transferred to the recipients by oral gavage within 30 min of excretion to maintain bacterial viability. The impact of the DHEA-shaped gut microbiome was analysed and discussed from metabolic and endocrinal perspectives.

In a landmark study, FMT from obese conventional mice to germ-free counterparts caused a significant increase in body weight in the recipients, suggesting an association between the gut microbiome and body weight [32]. In this study, excluding the effect of obesity on metabolism and endocrine functions in FMT recipients, body weight was similar between the t-PBS and t-DHEA groups. Glucose metabolism was closely correlated to the gut microbiota, and dietary fibre-induced gut microbiota relieved T2DM [11, 33]. Although the baseline blood glucose was similar between groups, rats in the t-DHEA group showed significantly elevated blood glucose levels and area under the curve in GTT. Compared with the t-PBS group, a decreased relative abundance of Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto in gut microbiota was observed in the t-DHEA group. Previous studies showed an association of these genera with glucose metabolism. The decreased relative abundance of Turicibacter was negatively correlated with impaired glucose tolerance induced by rapamycin treatment [34]. Clostridium sensu stricto and its family Clostridiaceae were regarded as biomarkers of previous gestational diabetes mellitus [35]. Therefore, the glucose intolerance in recipients of DHEA-shaped microbiomes may result from dysbiosis. Glucose intolerance and increased circulating NEFA levels were both regarded as early markers for metabolic derangement and insulin resistance [36]. NEFA administration damaged mitochondrial function and increased reactive oxygen species production, thus inducing hepatic lipid accumulation and insulin resistance [37]. In this study, rats in the t-DHEA group displayed elevated serum NEFA levels and hepatic steatosis, indicating metabolic derangement and potential insulin resistance. An analysis of the functional enrichment of the faecal metabolome indicated arginine biosynthesis alteration. Arginine was associated with glucose and lipid metabolism, and dietary supplementation with arginine was beneficial to metabolic syndrome, including obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia [38]. A recent meta-analysis validated the impact of arginine supplementation on the lipid profile [39]. Since arginine biosynthesis alteration was triggered by the FMT of DHEA-shaped gut microbiota, androgens may regulate glucolipid metabolism through dysregulated arginine biosynthesis. In addition, the arginine level served as an early biochemical marker of underlying cardiovascular complications in PCOS [40]. It was reported that gut microbes could distally control hepatic gene expression, resulting in transcriptional variants of hepatic metabolism [41]. The liver transcriptome was used to determine the effect of changes in gut microbes and microbial metabolites on glucose and lipid metabolism. The effect of transferred gut microbiota on recipient liver gene expression was not significant; however, there were some changes. Therefore, a 1.2-fold-change was employed to analyse the underlying variations [42, 43]. The effects of DHEA-shaped gut microbiota on gene transcription in the liver have rarely been studied. Hepatic gene expression profiling showed that DHEA-shaped gut microbiota perturbed glucose metabolism, cholesterol metabolism and immune response, which was in accordance with the glucose intolerance, liver lipid accumulation and dyslipidaemia exhibited in PCOS-like rat-FMT recipients. Thus, the gut microbiota in DHEA-treated rats possibly disrupted glucose and lipid metabolism by regulating hepatic gene expression.

There are mutual interactions between androgen and gut microbiota [7, 8]. Nevertheless, it has not been determined whether there is a bidirectional effect between hyperandrogenism and gut dysbiosis or how it might participate in the development of PCOS. DHEA-induced gut dysbiosis was confirmed in the rat PCOS model. Furthermore, FMT from DHEA-induced PCOS-like rats increased serum T level in recipients, indicating the regulatory effect of the gut microbiome on serum T levels (Additional file 5: Figure S5). DHEA-S in the transplant and gut microbiota were simultaneously transferred to recipients. There is a common belief that DHEA and DHEA-S can interconvert freely. However, a previous study found no change in serum DHEA levels after oral administration of DHEA-S and concluded that DHEA-S is not the origin of bioavailable DHEA [44]. As DHEA was not detected and DHEA-S levels were very low in the transplant, we considered that the effect of FMT in the transplant may be irrelevant to either DHEA or DHEA-S and was mainly attributed to the transfer of gut microbiota. There are several potential mechanisms by which the gut microbiome influences serum T levels. Markle et al. reported that elevated T level was attributed to increased hormone production due to the increased androgen precursor level [45]. Both ovary and adrenal glands could be the origins of these androgens. The adrenal gland is the effector organ of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal gland (HPA) axis. Gut dysbiosis disturbs the homeostasis of the HPA axis, which is essential in coping with stress [46]. Stressed animal models displayed declined Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto, suggesting an association between stress and the reduced relative abundance of Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto [47]. These 2 genera were depleted in the t-DHEA group, indicating that the HPA axis function was possibly altered in these rats. The dysregulated HPA axis may perturb androgen production and T levels [48]. On the other hand, dysbiosis of gut microbiota can lead to metabolic derangement, including insulin resistance [49, 50]. The subsequent hyperinsulinemia causes excessive androgen production in the ovaries and increases circulating T. Nevertheless, FMT-induced hyperandrogenism may be a vital factor in ovarian morphological anomalies and disrupted oestrous cycles. This phenomenon deserves further investigation owing to its promising roles in the development and evolution of PCOS. A derangement of gonadotropin levels occurred in FMT recipients of PCOS-like rats. The LH and FSH levels decreased in the t-DHEA group and were associated with gut microbes. Together with hyperandrogenism, suppressed serum FSH levels contributed to deteriorating ovarian morphology and oestrous cycles and reduced levels of gonadotrophins implied GnRH suppression which was possibly regulated by the gut–brain axis. The gut–brain axis refers to the mutual communication between the gut and the central nervous system [51]. The hypothalamus is a primary location in the brain responsible for receiving nervous and humoral regulation signals from the gut microbiome. De Palma et al. showed that variations in the gut microbiota could influence the functioning of the hypothalamus [46]. In addition, the hypothalamus is also the upstream commander of many endocrine axes including the hypothalamus–pituitary–ovary (HPO) axis. It is known that dysregulation in the HPA axis inhibits the HPO axis. Therefore, decreased GnRH and gonadotropins may be attributed to potential HPA dysfunction. In addition, arginine levels regulate GnRH synthesis and secretion. Serum arginine levels were reduced in PCOS patients, and it was found that L-arginine administration could ameliorate hormonal disturbances in PCOS rats [52]. Besides, arginine is the precursor of nitric oxide, which plays a critical role in the neuroendocrine regulation of reproduction and is involved in controlling the activity of GnRH neurons [53]. Therefore, GnRH secretion may be affected by gut microbiota dysbiosis and metabolome shifts, thereby disturbing the HPO axis.

Overall, gut microbiota from PCOS-like hyperandrogenic rats induces glucose and lipid metabolism disorder, disrupted oestrous cycles, polycystic ovaries and reproductive hormone variations in pseudo germ-free recipients. Therefore, gut dysbiosis may coordinate with hyperandrogenism to disrupt metabolic and endocrinal homeostasis through disturbance of the HPA and HPO axes. In PCOS, this process is potentially regulated by the gut–brain and gut–liver axes (Additional file 5: Figure S5).

Conclusions

DHEA treatment induces the PCOS-like phenotype and gut dysbiosis in SD rats. The establishment of the PCOS model in pseudo germ-free rats shows that gut microbiota depletion cannot prevent PCOS-like phenotypes in DHEA-treated rats and hyperandrogenism remains the primary factor in PCOS pathogenesis. FMT-oriented gut dysbiosis causes PCOS-like phenotypes, including metabolic and endocrinal malfunction in recipients. Therefore, androgen-shaped gut microbiota also plays a part in PCOS pathogenesis. These novel findings shed light on the understanding of new etiological agents and potential comprehensive PCOS treatment options.

Methods

Animals

Thirty SD rats (female, 3-week old) were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co Ltd., Beijing, China. Two rats per cage were housed in 15 individually ventilated cages in a specific pathogen-free environment and maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle, controlled temperature and stable humidity, with 24 h free access to standard irradiated rodent feed and non-acidified drinking water. The rats’ body weights were measured weekly.

Establishment of PCOS model

Eighteen rats were randomly allocated to 3 groups: PBS, DHEA and DHEA + antibiotics groups (n = 6 each group). To induce the PCOS phenotype, rats in the DHEA group were subcutaneously injected with 6 mg/100 g bodyweight DHEA (cat. no. H10940064, Yangzhou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd) daily for 35 consecutive days. Rats in the PBS group were injected with PBS. Rats in the DHEA + antibiotics group were injected with DHEA in the same manner as the DHEA group and received a freshly prepared antibiotic cocktail daily in their drinking water. The antibiotic cocktail, consisting of ampicillin sodium (1 mg mL−1), neomycin sulfate (1 mg mL−1), metronidazole (1 mg mL−1), and vancomycin hydrochloride (0.5 mg mL−1) (all purchased from Sangon Biotech, China) [54], was administered to rats every day immediately after preparation. The rats in all 3 groups were sacrificed after 5 weeks of treatment.

Establishment of FMT model

Twelve other rats were randomly allocated into 2 groups, a t-PBS and a t-DHEA group (n = 6 each group). First, a three-course antibiotic treatment was administered to both groups of FMT recipient rats to establish the pseudo germ-free rat model as previously described [31, 54]. They were given an antibiotic cocktail in drinking water for 7 days, non-acidified drinking water for 2 days, the antibiotic cocktail in drinking water for 7 days, non-acidified drinking water for 2 days, the antibiotic cocktail in drinking water for 7 days, and non-acidified drinking water for 2 days before FMT. The faecal samples were collected and processed within 30 min to ensure bacterial viability in the transplant. The faecal pellets were pooled and homogenised with 1 mL PBS and 1 mL skimmed milk per pellet (0.2 g) [21]. Then, the mixture was allowed to settle by gravity for 5 min, and 1 mL supernatant was transferred to recipients by oral gavage every day for 14 days. After the 21-day PCOS model establishment, the donors continued to receive DHEA for another 14 days during FMT. The microbial loads in donors after DHEA treatment and in recipients after ABX treatment were assessed using MAKLER counting chamber. The recipients received approximately 1 × 109 microbes by oral gavage daily and were sacrificed after 2 weeks of FMT.

GTT

All rats were fasted overnight for 16 h before GTT. The blood glucose levels were measured using tail vein blood before and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after intraperitoneal glucose administration (50% glucose, 2 g/kg body weight). The total area under the GTT curve was calculated using GraphPad Prism 7.00.

Vaginal smears and oestrous cycle determination

Vaginal smears were taken daily between 9:00 am and 11:00 am for 8 consecutive days before sacrifice. The oestrous cycle stage was determined by observation of the vaginal smears using a light microscopic (Zeiss, Germany). Briefly, samples dominated by nucleated epithelial cells indicated the proestrus stage, and those with primarily cornified squamous epithelial cells indicated the estrus stage. The metestrus stage was indicated by comparative quantities of cornified squamous epithelial cells and leukocytes, while the diestrus stage was dominated by leukocytes.

Organ collection and histology

The rats were euthanised by cervical dislocation. The ovaries were carefully dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at room temperature before being embedded in paraffin. The livers were also carefully separated. A sample of liver tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at – 80 °C for future use. Others were fixed and embedded using the same procedure as the ovaries. Eight-micrometre-thick tissue sections of ovaries and livers were processed by H&E and ORO staining according to standard histological procedures and examined using a light microscope (Zeiss, Germany).

Serum analysis

At the end of the treatments, blood samples were collected from the abdominal aorta of anaesthetised rats using a pro-coagulation tube and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Then the upper supernatants were carefully transferred to cryogenic vials and immediately stored at – 80 °C for further evaluation. The levels of TT (582701, Cayman, USA), SHBG (MBS014745, Mybiosource, USA), LH (MBS2018978, MyBioSource, USA) and FSH (EKU04249, BIOMATIK, Canada) were analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. To assess the biologically active amount of testosterone, the FAI was calculated using the following formula: FAI = (TT × 100)/SHBG [55]. Separate serum samples were sent to the Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc., to evaluate serum lipids.

Faecal sample collection and DNA extraction

The faecal pellets were collected in cryogenic vials immediately after being discharged before sacrifice. The faecal samples were snap-frozen and stored at – 80 °C before analysis. Microbial DNA was extracted from rat faecal samples using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (51604, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A Class II biosafety cabinet was used for the preparation of the extracted DNA. The studies were carried out attentively by the same technician to reduce the risks of contamination or operational mistakes. The quantity and purity of the extracted DNA were controlled using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). The integrity and size of the isolated DNA were evaluated using agarose gel electrophoresis.

16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing

The V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR under the following conditions: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 98 °C for 20 s, 58 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 20 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The primers used were 341F 5′-CCTACGGGRSGCAGCAG)-3′ and 806R 5′-GGACTACVVGGGTATCTAATC-3′ [56]. The 30-μL reaction system consisted of 15-μL 2 × KAPA Library Amplification ReadyMix, 20-μM primers, 50-ng template DNA and double-distilled water. The amplification products were isolated using 2% agarose gel, purified using a AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, USA), and quantitatively measured by Qubit®2.0 (Invitrogen, USA). After library establishment, the tags were sequenced using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., USA) for 250-bp paired-end reads.

Process of 16S sequencing data

After trimming the primers and barcodes, the lengths and average base quality of the tags were evaluated. The 16S tags were limited to the region between 220 bp and 500 bp. The average Phred score of the bases were at least 20 (Q20), and at most 3 ambiguous N. The enumeration of the tags was followed by the removal of redundancy. Only the reliable tags (frequency > 1) were allocated into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) labelled by a representative tag. Next, Userach (version 7.0) was used to cluster the OTUs at 97% similarity and filter out the chimeric sequences. Every representative tag was aligned against the RDP database (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) and assigned to a taxon (confidence threshold: 0.8). Tags which could not be distributed to any known taxonomy level were defined as “unclassified.” Python scripts of Qiime (V1.9.1) were included for OTU standardisation, OTU profiling and alpha/beta diversity assessment. Random levelling of samples was performed to reduce the deviation resulting from size differences. The microbial richness and evenness were evaluated by α-diversity by the PD whole tree index, which is based on the phylogenetic tree and evaluates diversity by summing the length of all branches. PCoA, adonis analysis and ANOSIM were employed to differentiate the microbial composition between groups [57]. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to determine the statistical significance of taxa and KEGG orthologues (KOs). The differences in the relative abundance of bacterial taxa between groups were identified using the LEfSe method (version 1.0). The significance level was set at p < 0.05 and the effect size at LDA score > 2.0. STAMP (version 2.1.3) was used to identify differentially enriched KO modules between groups. Correlation analysis between gut microbiota and clinical parameters, gut microbiota and faecal metabolome, and faecal metabolome and clinical parameters was conducted using Spearman’s rho correlation test. The degree of transfer of gut microbiota from donor rats to pseudo germ-free rats was evaluated using SourceTracker software version 1.0.1.

Gut microbiota metabolite analysis

Faecal metabolome analysis was conducted using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS, Agilent 1290 UHPLC). The data were collected using AB 5600 Triple TOF under the control of Analyst TF 1.7 (AB Sciex). The raw data were converted using ProteoWizard and processed using XCMS, followed by metabolite identification. The metabolites were annotated using m/z, retention time, and MS/MS fragmentation patterns. The differential metabolites between groups were identified using the student’s t test and orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Volcano and bubble plots were produced using the R package (version 3.5.1). The corrplot package was used for correlation analysis, the pheatmap package was used for hierarchical clustering, and the ropls package for OPLS-DA. DHEA-S was quantified in each pellet of the donor animals’ faeces using LCMSMS.

Library construction for mRNA-seq and sequencing

A RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to extract total RNA from the rat livers. The TruSeq® RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) was employed to construct paired-end libraries based on the manufacturer’s guidelines. An Agilent 2100 bioanalyser was used to evaluate the concentration and size distribution of the cDNA library (Agilent Technologies, USA). Finally, the libraries were sequenced on the HiSeq Xten platform (Illumina, USA).

Process of mRNA-seq data

First, the raw reads were filtered by Seqtk (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk). Clean reads were obtained after adapter removal, quality control and host contaminant filtering of raw reads using Seqtk. Quality control was based on the Phred score of each base being more than 20, and the read length greater than 25 bp. Hisat2 (version 2.0.4) was employed to map the cleaned reads to Rattus norvegicus Rnor_6.0 [58]. The genes fragments were counted using Stringtie (version:1.3.0) followed by FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) normalisation [59]. EdgeR was used to identify the DEGs based on FPKM values with the thresholds of p < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.2. The heat map was produced by R package pheatmap. IPA software was used for bioinformatics analysis of DEGs.

Statistics

GraphPad Prism 7.00 was used to perform statistical analyses and data visualisation. The sample sizes were calculated using GraphPad StatMate 2.0 with power analysis. A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed to examine the quantitative data for Gaussian distribution. A two-tailed unpaired student’s t test, Mann–Whitney test and one-way analysis of variance coupled with Turkey’s multiple comparisons test were performed to assess the differences between and among groups. The quantitative data were shown as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A difference of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

The 16S rRNA gene sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession code PRJNA635286. Hepatic mRNA sequencing data is available at NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), series accession number GSE151220. All data can be obtained in this manuscript or from the authors upon request.

Abbreviations

PCOS:

Polycystic ovary syndrome

DHEA:

Dehydroepiandrosterone

DHEA-S:

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

FMT:

Faecal microbiota transplantation

LH:

Luteinising hormone

CL:

Corpora lutea

TT:

Total testosterone

SHBG:

Sex hormone-binding globulin

FAI:

Free androgen index

FSH:

Follicle-stimulating hormone

ABX:

Antibiotics

GTT:

Glucose tolerance test

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes

H&E:

Haematoxylin & eosin

ORO:

Oil red O

NEFA:

Non-esterified fatty acids

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

TCHO:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

IPA:

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

GnRH:

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone

HPA:

Hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal gland

HPO:

Hypothalamus–pituitary–ovary

SD:

Sprague Dawley

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

PCoA:

Principal coordinate analysis

ANOSIM:

Analysis of similarities

LDA:

Linear discriminant analysis

LEfSe:

LDA effect size

KOs:

KEGG orthologues

LC-MS:

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

OPLS-DA:

Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis

FPKM:

Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

References

  1. Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS, Hickey TE. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet. 2007;370(9588):685–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61345-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(5):270–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2018.24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coviello AD, Legro RS, Dunaif A. Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of the metabolic syndrome associated with increasing androgen levels independent of obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(2):492–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma ZS, Li W. How and why men and women differ in their microbiomes: medical ecology and network analyses of the microgenderome. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019;6(23):1902054. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902054.

  5. Bolnick DI, Snowberg LK, Hirsch PE, Lauber CL, Org E, Parks B, et al. Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4500. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Darzi Y, Faust K, et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science. 2016;352(6285):560–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yurkovetskiy L, Burrows M, Khan AA, Graham L, Volchkov P, Becker L, et al. Gender bias in autoimmunity is influenced by microbiota. Immunity. 2013;39(2):400–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markle JG, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science. 2013;339(6123):1084–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1233521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486(7402):222–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu R, Hong J, Xu X, Feng Q, Zhang D, Gu Y, et al. Gut microbiome and serum metabolome alterations in obesity and after weight-loss intervention. Nat Med. 2017;23(7):859–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490(7418):55–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jie Z, Xia H, Zhong SL, Feng Q, Li S, Liang S, et al. The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00900-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan AE, Kau AL, et al. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science. 2013;341(6150):1241214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241214.

  14. Qi X, Yun C, Sun L, Xia J, Wu Q, Wang Y, et al. Gut microbiota-bile acid-interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1225–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0509-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis V9 regulates the secretion of sex hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome patients through the gut-brain axis. mSystems. 2019;4(2):e00017–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Torres PJ, Siakowska M, Banaszewska B, Pawelczyk L, Duleba AJ, Kelley ST, et al. Gut microbial diversity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome correlates with hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(4):1502–11. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu W, Han Q, Xu J, Wang J, Sun Y, Li W, et al. Metagenomic analysis identified microbiome alterations and pathological association between intestinal microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(6):1286–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jobira B, Frank DN, Pyle L, Silveira LJ, Kelsey MM, Garcia-Reyes Y, et al. Obese adolescents with PCOS have altered biodiversity and relative abundance in gastrointestinal microbiota. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(6):e2134–44. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz263.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang F, Ma T, Cui P, Tamadon A, He S, Huo C, et al. Diversity of the gut microbiota in dihydrotestosterone-induced PCOS rats and the pharmacologic effects of Diane-35, probiotics, and berberine. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Esmaeilinezhad Z, Babajafari S, Sohrabi Z, Eskandari MH, Amooee S, Barati-Boldaji R. Effect of synbiotic pomegranate juice on glycemic, sex hormone profile and anthropometric indices in PCOS: a randomized, triple blind, controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(2):201–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2018.07.002.

  21. Zhao L, Huang Y, Lu L, Yang W, Huang T, Lin Z, et al. Saturated long-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria contribute to enhanced colonic motility in rats. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0492-6.

  22. Zhou L, et al. Correlation between fecal metabolomics and gut microbiota in obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xue J, Li X, Liu P, Li K, Sha L, Yang X, et al. Inulin and metformin ameliorate polycystic ovary syndrome via anti-inflammation and modulating gut microbiota in mice. Endocr J. 2019;66(10):859–70. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Torres PJ, Ho BS, Arroyo P, Sau L, Chen A, Kelley ST, et al. Exposure to a healthy gut microbiome protects against reproductive and metabolic dysregulation in a PCOS mouse model. Endocrinology. 2019;160(5):1193–204. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2019-00050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sherman SB, Sarsour N, Salehi M, Schroering A, Mell B, Joe B, et al. Prenatal androgen exposure causes hypertension and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Gut Microbes. 2018;9(5):400–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1441664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thackray VG. Sex, microbes, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019;30(1):54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2018.11.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang TWH, et al. Loss of gut microbiota alters immune system composition and cripples post-infarction cardiac repair. Circulation. 2018;139(5):647–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zarrinpar A, Chaix A, Xu ZZ, Chang MW, Marotz CA, Saghatelian A, et al. Antibiotic-induced microbiome depletion alters metabolic homeostasis by affecting gut signaling and colonic metabolism. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2872. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05336-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong SH, Zhao L, Zhang X, Nakatsu G, Han J, Xu W, et al. Gavage of fecal samples from patients with colorectal cancer promotes intestinal carcinogenesis in germ-free and conventional mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(6):1621–33. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Palma G, et al. Transplantation of fecal microbiota from patients with irritable bowel syndrome alters gut function and behavior in recipient mice. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9(379):eaaf6397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Staley C, Kaiser T, Beura LK, Hamilton MJ, Weingarden AR, Bobr A, et al. Stable engraftment of human microbiota into mice with a single oral gavage following antibiotic conditioning. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0306-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, Wu G, Lam YY, Wang X, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359(6380):1151–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao5774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jung MJ, Lee J, Shin NR, Kim MS, Hyun DW, Yun JH, et al. Chronic repression of mTOR complex 2 induces changes in the gut microbiota of diet-induced obese mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30887. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Crusell MKW, Hansen TH, Nielsen T, Allin KH, Rühlemann MC, Damm P, et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with change in the gut microbiota composition in third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0472-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Karpe F, Dickmann JR, Frayn KN. Fatty acids, obesity, and insulin resistance: time for a reevaluation. Diabetes. 2011;60(10):2441–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-0425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(4):2133–223. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00063.2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jobgen WS, Fried SK, Fu WJ, Meininger CJ, Wu G. Regulatory role for the arginine-nitric oxide pathway in metabolism of energy substrates. J Nutr Biochem. 2006;17(9):571–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hadi A, Arab A, Moradi S, Pantovic A, Clark CCT, Ghaedi E. The effect of l-arginine supplementation on lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2019;122(9):1021–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519001855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kyselova A, Hinrichsmeyer H, Zukunft S, Mann AW, Dornauf I, Fleming I, et al. Association between arginase-containing platelet-derived microparticles and altered plasma arginine metabolism in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 2019;90:16–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.10.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Murakami M, Tognini P, Liu Y, Eckel-Mahan KL, Baldi P, Sassone-Corsi P. Gut microbiota directs PPARgamma-driven reprogramming of the liver circadian clock by nutritional challenge. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(9):1292–303. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lip SV, et al. Early-onset preeclampsia, plasma microRNAs, and endothelial cell function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):497.e1–497.e12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng X, Ander BP, Jickling GC, Zhan X, Hull H, Sharp FR, et al. MicroRNA and their target mRNAs change expression in whole blood of patients after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40(4):775–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19839501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hammer F, Subtil S, Lux P, Maser-Gluth C, Stewart PM, Allolio B, et al. No evidence for hepatic conversion of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) sulfate to DHEA: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3600–5. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-2386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Markle JG, Frank DN, Adeli K, von Bergen M, Danska JS. Microbiome manipulation modifies sex-specific risk for autoimmunity. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(4):485–93. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.29795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. De Palma G, et al. Microbiota and host determinants of behavioural phenotype in maternally separated mice. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7735. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Geng S, Yang L, Cheng F, Zhang Z, Li J, Liu W, et al. Gut microbiota are associated with psychological stress-induced defections in intestinal and blood-brain barriers. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3067. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Rege J, Nakamura Y, Satoh F, Morimoto R, Kennedy MR, Layman LC, et al. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of human adrenal vein 19-carbon steroids before and after ACTH stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1182–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Le Chatelier E, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500(7464):541–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mahana D, Trent CM, Kurtz ZD, Bokulich NA, Battaglia T, Chung J, et al. Antibiotic perturbation of the murine gut microbiome enhances the adiposity, insulin resistance, and liver disease associated with high-fat diet. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0297-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(3):926–38. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI76304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ragy MM, Abdel-Hamid HA, Toni NDM. Pathophysiological changes in experimental polycystic ovary syndrome in female albino rats: using either hemin or L-arginine. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):8426–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bellefontaine N, Chachlaki K, Parkash J, Vanacker C, Colledge W, d’Anglemont de Tassigny X, et al. Leptin-dependent neuronal NO signaling in the preoptic hypothalamus facilitates reproduction. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(6):2550–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI65928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Josefsdottir KS, Baldridge MT, Kadmon CS, King KY. Antibiotics impair murine hematopoiesis by depleting intestinal microbiota. Blood. 2017;129(6):729–39. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-708594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Li S, Chu Q, Ma J, Sun Y, Tao T, Huang R, et al. Discovery of novel lipid profiles in PCOS: Do insulin and androgen oppositely regulate bioactive lipid production? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(3):810–21. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang Y, Qian PY. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Amato KR, Yeoman CJ, Kent A, Righini N, Carbonero F, Estrada A, et al. Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes. ISME J. 2013;7(7):1344–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(9):1650–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the technical assistance in 16S rRNA gene and hepatic mRNA sequencing by Realbio Technology and Shanghai Biotechnology Corporation.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1001002 and 2018YFC1003202), the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81971343 and  81671414) and Shanghai Commission of Science and Technology (No.19410760300 and 20DZ2270900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200135, China

    Qixin Han, Juan Wang, Weiping Li, Zi-Jiang Chen & Yanzhi Du

  2. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, 200135, China

    Qixin Han, Juan Wang, Weiping Li, Zi-Jiang Chen & Yanzhi Du

  3. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China

    Zi-Jiang Chen

  4. National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China

    Zi-Jiang Chen

  5. Key laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China

    Zi-Jiang Chen

Authors
  1. Qixin Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weiping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zi-Jiang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanzhi Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QH, WL, ZC and YD conceived and designed the study. QH and JW performed the animal studies. QH interpreted the results; analyzed the microbiome, metabolome, and transcriptome data; and drafted the manuscript. YD revised the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zi-Jiang Chen or Yanzhi Du.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Shanghai Research Center (company) for Model Organisms Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (SRCMO IACUC, 2019-0031-06).

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Microbial characteristics of DHEA-induced PCOS-like rats.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Depleting the gut microbiota by antibiotic treatment in DHEA+ABX group.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Transplant contents in FMT donors and gut circumstances in antibiotic-treated recipients before FMT initiation.

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Microbial composition in FMT donors and recipients.

Additional file 5: Figure S5.

Effects of DHEA-shaped gut microbiome transplantation in recipient rats.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Q., Wang, J., Li, W. et al. Androgen-induced gut dysbiosis disrupts glucolipid metabolism and endocrinal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome. Microbiome 9, 101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01046-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01046-5

Keywords

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome
  • Gut microbiota
  • 16S rRNA gene sequence
  • Metabolome
  • Faecal microbiota transplantation

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us