Skip to content

Advertisement

Microbiome

Research
Open Access

Catalogue of antibiotic resistome and host-tracking in drinking water deciphered by a large scale survey

†Contributed equally
Microbiome20175:154

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0369-0

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 27 April 2017

Accepted: 2 November 2017

Published: 28 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Excesses of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), which are regarded as emerging environmental pollutants, have been observed in various environments. The incidence of ARGs in drinking water causes potential risks to human health and receives more attention from the public. However, ARGs harbored in drinking water remain largely unexplored. In this study, we aimed at establishing an antibiotic resistome catalogue in drinking water samples from a wide range of regions and to explore the potential hosts of ARGs.

Results

A catalogue of antibiotic resistome in drinking water was established, and the host-tracking of ARGs was conducted through a large-scale survey using metagenomic approach. The drinking water samples were collected at the point of use in 25 cities in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, South Africa, Singapore and the USA. In total, 181 ARG subtypes belonging to 16 ARG types were detected with an abundance range of 2.8 × 10−2 to 4.2 × 10−1 copies of ARG per cell. The highest abundance was found in northern China (Henan Province). Bacitracin, multidrug, aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, and beta-lactam resistance genes were dominant in drinking water. Of the drinking water samples tested, 84% had a higher ARG abundance than typical environmental ecosystems of sediment and soil. Metagenomic assembly-based host-tracking analysis identified Acidovorax, Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Methylobacterium, Methyloversatilis, Mycobacterium, Polaromonas, and Pseudomonas as the hosts of ARGs. Moreover, potential horizontal transfer of ARGs in drinking water systems was proposed by network and Procrustes analyses.

Conclusions

The antibiotic resistome catalogue compiled using a large-scale survey provides a useful reference for future studies on the global surveillance and risk management of ARGs in drinking water.

Graphical abstract

.
Graphical Abstract image

Keywords

Drinking waterPublic healthAntibiotic resistomeHost-trackingHorizontal gene transferBacterial community

Background

The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, not only for human therapy, but also for livestock breeding around the world over the past decades have led to the emergence and excess of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in a diverse range of environments [1–4]. Among the various ARB and ARG reservoirs, aquatic ecosystems are considered to be the most important due to the high mobility of organisms and genetic elements [5]. ARGs have been reported to rapidly spread, conducted by mobile genetic elements in ecosystems [6]. The rapid transfer and spread of ARGs among bacterial cells [7] could be facilitated by mobile genetic elements, including plasmids, transposons and integrons, etc. Recently, findings on ARGs in drinking water distribution systems, especially in treated drinking water that may have direct contact with human beings, have given rise to medical concerns from both researchers and the public [8–10]. Although most microorganisms can be effectively removed after the treatment process, disinfection resistant microbes can proliferate in the drinking water distribution system [10]. Previous studies have reported that drinking water chlorination could contribute to the enrichment of ARGs, likely induced by the underlying mechanisms of cross- or co-resistance to disinfectants and antibiotics [9, 11]. Thus, disinfection resistant microorganisms may carry more ARGs after drinking water treatment, causing potential risks and deserving more public attention.

To date, the molecular study of the microbial community and ARGs in drinking water at the user end has been mainly restricted by the following difficulties: (1) low biomass concentration for DNA extraction, (2) sample collection logistics, and (3) sampling standardization. Because of these difficulties, few studies have been conducted regarding the spatial variations of ARGs and microbial communities in drinking water at the point of use. However, the occurrence of ARGs in the point of use of drinking water may pose direct threats to human health and deserves more attentions from the public. Forsberg et al. found that soil bacteria structures resistomes across habitats, indicating the horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of ARGs between soil bacteria was in low frequency, in contrast to human pathogens [12]. Whether drinking water bacteria drive resistomes and the potential risks of HGT both remain largely unknown. The in-depth investigation of ARGs and bacterial community profiles in large-scale drinking water samples is central to understanding the overall picture, which is essential for decision-making about water management to control antibiotic resistance in drinking water systems.

In the present study, we collected drinking water samples at the point of use from 25 cities in seven countries and regions, including mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, South Africa, Singapore, and the USA. We applied a metagenomic approach to achieve the following goals: (1) detect the antibiotic resistome in drinking water samples over a wide range of regions, (2) investigate the correlation between bacteria and resistomes, and (3) explore the potential hosts of ARGs. This large sequencing data set for a wide scope survey on the microbial community and ARGs in drinking water reflects the comprehensive resistome profiles and reveals the potential risks to human health caused by ARGs in drinking water.

Methods

Tap water sampling, pretreatment, and DNA extraction

Drinking water samples were collected from the point of use of 25 cities in mainland China (n = 20), Hong Kong (n = 1), Macau (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1), Singapore (n = 1), and the USA (n = 1). Additional sample descriptions can be found in supporting information, Additional file 1 Table S1 and Additional file 1 Figure S1. High-performance cartridge-type water purifiers (Torayvino, Toray Industries Inc., Japan) were installed on taps according to a protocol described elsewhere [8], to collect microorganisms by filtering tap water. Approximately 2000 L of tap water were filtered, controlling the flow rate of ~ 40 L/h, for about 48 h. After filtration, the purifiers were immersed into 50% ethanol solution to fix the captured microorganisms. The filters were delivered back to the laboratory within 72 h using an ice box. Upon arrival, the hollow fiber filter within purifiers was taken out and immersed into 100 mL ultrapure water and then treated using ultrasonication (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., USA) for 15 min to detach the microbial cells. The cells in water were subsequently collected by the filtration using a 0.45-μm cellulose ester membrane (Millipore Corp., USA). The effectiveness of capturing microorganisms by this approach had been evaluated before [8]. The membranes were stored at − 20 °C before DNA extraction. Additionally, three water purifiers with no tap water filtration were used as blank samples. Genomic DNA was extracted using FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, France) following the standard protocol. DNA concentration was measured by Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Life techniques). The DNA concentration of the three blank samples was below the detection limit.

Metagenomic sequencing

DNA for each sample (5 μg) was used for 350 bp library construction (Nextera® DNA Library Preparation Kit), and paired-end (2 × 100 bp reads) metagenomic sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform in the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI). Data filtration was performed to guarantee the quality of the downstream analysis (Additional file 1 S1). Filtered data obtained from tap water samples was 120 Gb (giga base pairs) in total, which is the largest sequence data set reported to date on the study of ARGs in drinking water samples. The metagenomics data was deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Reads Archive database (NCBI SRA) under the BioProject PRJNA305188.

Illumina MiSeq sequencing for 16S rRNA genes

The V4 region (~ 265 nucleotides) of the 16S rRNA gene sequences was amplified using F515 (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and R806 (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) primers (Additional file 1 Table S2). Dual-index sequencing strategy for primers (adapter + barcode + pad + linker + primer; Additional file 1 Table S3) and reaction conditions used in this study have been described elsewhere [13]. PCR assays were performed in triplicate to avoid the variations during amplification, and purified PCR amplicons were pooled together and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq PE250 (BGI). All the drinking water samples were successfully amplified and generated 32,525–147,248 sequencing reads. Additionally, three water purifiers with no tap water filtration were used as blank samples. Two samples were selected to evaluate the biases of using primers with different barcodes. One sample was selected using different DNA extraction kits to assess the effects of the kits on DNA extractions (Additional file 1 S2). All 16S rRNA gene sequences generated from tap water samples were deposited into NCBI SRA under the BioProject PRJNA305188. Sequences were analyzed using Mothur software as described previously [13]. Sequencing depth was normalized to 30,000 sequences for each sample. 16S rRNA gene sequences were clustered into OTUs based on the similarity threshold of 0.97.

Identification of ARG-like sequences

All the metagenomic sequencing data was searched for ARGs against a structured non-redundant ARDB database [14, 15] using Usearch + BLASTX with an E-value ≤ 10−5. A sequence (100 bp short reads) was designated as an ARG-like fragment if its best BLASTX alignment to reference ARG sequence showed a similarity of ≥ 90% and the alignment length was ≥ 25 amino acids [14]. This identification approach had been validated to have a high accuracy of ≥ 99.5% [16]. A package of customized scripts was developed for automatic classification of identified ARG-like sequences into 25 “ARG types” (e.g., aminoglycoside resistance gene) and 619 “ARG subtypes” (e.g., aadA, aadB, etc.) [14]. To assess the ARG distributions in tap water samples, the abundance of ARGs was normalized and expressed as “copy of ARG per cell” (capc) using the following equation [17]:
$$ \mathsf{Abundance}={\sum}_{\mathit{\mathsf{i}}}^{\mathit{\mathsf{n}}}\frac{{\mathit{\mathsf{N}}}_{\mathit{\mathsf{i}}\;\left(\mathsf{ARG}-\mathsf{like}\mathsf{s}\mathsf{equence}\right)}\times \mathsf{100}/{\mathit{\mathsf{L}}}_{\mathit{\mathsf{i}}\;\left(\mathsf{ARG}\mathsf{s}\mathsf{reference}\mathsf{s}\mathsf{equence}\right)}\;}{{\mathit{\mathsf{N}}}_{\mathsf{16}\mathsf{S}\;\mathsf{s}\mathsf{equence}}\times \mathsf{100}/{\mathit{\mathsf{L}}}_{\mathsf{16}\mathit{\mathsf{S}}\;\mathsf{s}\mathsf{equence}}}\times {\mathit{\mathsf{N}}}_{\mathsf{16}\mathit{\mathsf{S}}\;\mathsf{copy}\mathsf{number}} $$
where N i (ARG-like sequence) is the number of the ARG-like reads annotated as one specific ARG reference sequence, L i (ARGs reference sequence) is the sequence length (bp) of the corresponding ARG reference sequence, N 16S sequence is the number of the 16S rRNA gene sequence identified for the metagenomic sequencing data by comparison to Greengenes database [16], L 16S sequence is the average length of 16S rRNA genes (1432 bp) in Greengenes database [18], n is the number of mapped ARG reference sequences belonging to that ARG type or subtype, 100 is the sequence length (bp) of the metegenomic reads, and N 16S copy number is the average copy number of 16S rRNA genes per cell. The average copy number within cells was calculated using CopyRighter [19] based on the “.biom” file generated by QIIME. A clustering analysis (CA) and a Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) was performed based on the abundance matrix of ARG subtypes of all the tap water samples, using PAleontological STatistics software (PAST, version 3.09).

Metagenomic assembly and identification of ARG-carrying contigs

After quality control, the metagenomic sequences were assembled using IDBA algorithm (version 1.1.1) [20]. The identification of ARG-carrying contigs (ACCs) was conducted following the strategy proposed in our previous study [7]. In brief, contigs were assembled using IDBA with default parameters. The open reading frames (ORFs) prediction was conducted using Prodigal (version 2) [6]. Then, the predicted ORF sequences were searched against structured non-redundant ARDB database for ARG-like ORFs identification using BLASTX under an E-value ≤ 10−10 [21]. An ORF sequence was considered to be an ARG-like ORF if its best BLASTX hit alignment to ARG sequences was under a cutoff of ≥ 80% similarity and ≥ 70% query coverage [21]. The identified ARG-like ORFs were then classified according to the structured non-redundant ARDB database.

Taxonomic annotation of ARG-carrying contigs

To perform the taxonomic annotation of the identified ACCs, the ORF sequences of each ACC were compared to the local NCBI NR database using BLASTP with an E-value ≤ 10−5 [22] and then were parsed and annotated using MEGAN (MEtaGenome ANalyzer, version 5) [23]. An in house R script was used to assign taxa to contigs. In short, if more than 50% of the ORFs on a contig were attributed to the same kingdom/phylum/class/order/family/genus, then the contig was assigned to that taxon [24].

Network analysis

Previously, network analysis was extensively used for the exploration of the underlying associations among genes, proteins, and microorganisms in complex microbial communities [25, 26]. In the present study, a correlation matrix was constructed with ARG and 16S rRNA data to explore the potential correlations of ARG–ARG, ARG–bacteria, and bacteria–bacteria by calculating all pairwise Spearman’s correlation coefficients (ρ) among ARG subtypes that occurred in at least 40% of the tap water samples. A correlation between two nodes was regarded as statistically significant for ρ ≥ 0.6 and P value ≤ 0.01. ρ and P value were generated via R-function “rcorr” (Hmisc package). To reduce the frequency of false-positive results, the P values were then adjusted using Benjamini–Hochberg method [27]. The strong pairwise correlations among ARGs and species abundances formed correlation networks. The network analysis was performed in R environment using igraph, VEGAN, and Hmisc packages, and was visualized by the interactive platform of Gephi (version 0.9.0).

Procrustes analysis

To assess the potential for HGT of ARGs in drinking water, Procrustes analysis was performed based on the previously published hypothesis that bacterial phylogeny may structure the resistome (HGT in low frequency) if there were a strong correlation between the ARG profile and bacterial composition [12]. In brief, the difference between groups (ARG-bacteria) was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA test with Tukey post-hoc tests. A P value of < 0.05 (two-sided) was considered as statistically significant. Procrustes transformations were performed using two Bray-Curtis distances plots (PCoA) as input based on the matrix of microbial community and ARGs at subtype level. The measure of fit M 2 (the sum of squared distances between matched sample pairs) and P values were determined from 10,000 labeled permutations [12].

Results and discussion

Broad-spectrum profile of ARG abundance in tap water

In total, 181 ARG subtypes belonging to 16 ARG types were detected in at least one of the 25 tap water samples (Additional file 1 Table S4 and Additional file 1 Table S5). The ARG diversity (number of ARG subtypes) was in the range from 16 (sample S11, Macau, China) to 88 (sample S13, Guangdong province, China; Fig. 1). Overall, 14 tap water samples belonged to resistance level I (< 0.1 capc), 9 belonged to resistance level II (0.1~0.2 capc), and 2 belonged to resistance level III (> 0.2 capc; Additional file 1 Table S6). The highest ARG enrichment (resistance level III) was detected in samples S16 (4.3 × 10−1 capc, Henan province) and S04 (3.7 × 10−1 capc, Hebei province), which were both collected from northern China. This ARG enrichment was ~ 12-fold higher than that of the lowest S12 (Hainan province, southern China). Interestingly, Zhang et al. observed significantly high antibiotic emissions in the same regions, Henan and Hebei province of mainland China [28]. It has been shown previously that antibiotics released into the environment could contribute to the selection for antibiotic resistance [29]. The ARGs encoding resistance to bacitracin, multidrug, sulfonamide, beta-lactam, and aminoglycoside were more frequently detected in these tap water samples (Additional file 1 Table S7). As expected, these dominant ARGs were usually associated with antibiotics that have been extensively used in human or veterinary therapy [16]. Moreover, a moderate ARG level was observed in the drinking water of Singapore and the USA where tap water is considered to be direct potable water, and the similar ARG composition of their ARG compositions was revealed by cluster analysis (Additional file 1 Figure S2).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

The abundance and diversity of ARGs in drinking water samples. a. Color of sample ID shows the resistance level of ARGs (I, II and III). b Pie chart presents the profiles of ARG abundance (top 3 ARG types). c Diameter of pie chart indicates the ARG diversity (number of ARG subtypes). MLS: Macrolidelincosamide-streptogramin

We also compared the top 8 ARG types in the drinking water samples (Fig. 2). Bacitracin-ARGs were found to be the most dominant in 68% of the tap water samples, with an abundance of 2.2 × 10−3–1.7 × 10−1 capc. Multidrug-ARGs, which encode resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs, dominated in 20% of the tap water samples with an abundance of 2.7 × 10−3–2.4 × 10−1 capc. In contrast with previously reported data showing that the dominant ARG types in sewage, animal feces, and activated sludge were multidrug-ARGs, tetracycline-ARGs, and aminoglycoside-ARGs, respectively [16], we found that bacitracin-ARGs had the highest abundance in drinking water. A few previous studies also reported the prevalence of bacitracin-ARGs in freshwater [30–32]. Bacitracin resistance genes were once considered to be intrinsic to bacteria as they are widespread in 153 genera [21]. Diverse bacitracin resistant strains were isolated from deep glacial ice, such as Herminiimonas glaciei [30] and Dyadobacter hamtensis [31]. All 60 Aeromonas strains isolated from freshwater in India were resistant to bacitracin [32]. Moreover, significantly high levels of bacitracin-ARGs were observed in treated wastewater and Tibetan sediment, with levels up to 70% of total ARG abundance [6, 33]. Bacitracin is used for topical treatment of localized skin lesions, eye infections, and also for the prevention of wound infections. Additionally, its application in chicken feed has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, which could be greatly contributing to bacterial antibiotic resistance. Although bacitracin-ARGs were detected in these drinking water samples, whether these resistance genes could bring potential risks to public health still requires more systematic researches.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Abundance of the top 8 ARG types in the drinking water samples. Zero abundances were considered in the plot. MLS: Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin

Among the 181 identified ARG subtypes, some were generalists existing in all samples (Additional file 1 Figure S3), for example, multidrug efflux protein, multidrug HAE1-family protein, multidrug mexF, beta-lactam TEM-2, macrolide macB, and beta-lactam TEM-15, etc. Their abundance accounted for 72.7% of the total ARGs identified from the drinking water samples (Fig. 3). In total, 65 ARG subtypes were specialists only detected in one tap water sample, for example, the chloramphenicol resistance gene floR was only detected in S04 (Hebei, China). Some of the ARG subtypes identified in this study were detected previously using traditional PCR-based techniques, such as ampC and mecA in municipal wastewater [34]; tetO, tetW, and tetQ in lagoons [35]; and sulI, sulII, and blaTEM in river and drinking water sources [36]. However, many of the identified ARG subtypes had not previously been revealed in water environments. Thus, the traditional PCR-based methods, limited by primers, could not provide comprehensive ARG profiles for drinking water samples.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Shared ARG subtypes and taxa of drinking water samples. The color scale reflects the degree of a antibiotic resistance genes subtypes or b bacterial OTUs that are shared between the drinking water samples listed on the horizontal axis and along the vertical axis. Details of sample ID and abbreviation of sampling location are shown in Additional file 1 Table S1. For example, S01-HLJ, CN represents that drinking water S01 was collected from Heilongjiang province of China. The table shows the number of shared ARGs or bacterial OTUs and corresponding percentage of the shared ARGs or bacterial OTUs in total abundance

To further explore the potential correlation among ARGs, network analysis was used. It revealed the ARG combinations of mexE-mexF-oprN and sul1-aadA-aadB in drinking water (modularity = 0.493; Additional file 1 Figure S4, Additional file 1 S3). These gene combinations were previously discovered on the whole genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella enterica, respectively [37, 38]. Thus, the metagenomic based approach largely facilitated ARGs investigation over a larger spectrum without PCR bias and captured a more comprehensive picture of the correlation among ARG profiles in drinking water.

Comparison of ARG profiles from drinking water and other environmental samples

To explore ARGs autochthonous to drinking water samples, the catalogue of ARGs in drinking water was further compared to 56 environmental samples from seven niches, i.e., sediment (n = 7), river water (n = 5), sewage (n = 4), treated wastewater (n = 4), activated sludge (AS, n = 13), anaerobic digestion sludge (ADS, n = 11), and feces and wastewater from livestock farm (n = 12). Basic information about the 56 environmental samples is summarized in the supporting information (Additional file 1 Table S9), for which 39 metagenomic data sets have been used in our previous studies on the antibiotic resistome [7, 16]. In total, 501 ARG subtypes belonging to 20 ARG types were detected in the 81 environmental samples. The abundance of ARGs followed the order of sediment < river water < drinking water < sewage treatment plant (STP) ADS < STP AS < STP effluent < STP influent < feces and wastewater from livestock farm (Fig. 4a). In total, 84% of drinking water samples had higher total ARG abundance than that in sediment and soil, and 8% of samples (S04 and S16) had more ARGs than STP AS and STP ADS. The ARG levels in sewage and feces and wastewater from livestock farm were within 1–2 orders of magnitude higher than drinking water. The 181 identified ARG subtypes in the drinking water samples were detected in other environmental ecosystems, with a percentage of 32–92% (Fig. 4a). The nine ARG subtypes prevalent in all the drinking water samples were also found in activated sludge, influent, and livestock farm samples; however, two subtypes (Beta-lactam TEM-2 and TEM-15) were absent from sediment, river water, STP ADS, and STP effluent (Fig. 4a). The beta-lactam resistance genes of TEM-2 and TEM-15 were only prevalent in 9–25% of AS, ADS, and effluent samples but occurred in all STP influent samples (Additional file 1 Table S10). The grouping patterns shown in the PCoA plot demonstrated that drinking water samples were clearly separated from sewage and feces and clustered more closely with river water (Fig. 4b), indicated by a higher similarity of ARG profiles with natural water environments.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Comparison of ARGs in drinking water to other environments. a Comparison of the total ARG abundance in different environmental samples, and the frequency of ARG subtypes occurrence in drinking water, compared to other environmental samples. STP: sewage treatment plant; AS: activated sludge; ADS: anaerobic digestion sludge. b Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot showing the ARG composition differences among the 81 environmental samples from 8 ecosystems (Bray-Curtis)

The host of ARGs in tap water samples

There were 264 contigs assembled from drinking water metagenomes that carried ARGs. These ACCs were annotated as fragments of Acidovorax, Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Methylobacterium, Methyloversatilis, Mycobacterium, Polaromonas, or Pseudomonas, except for those unclassified. Among them, 34.5% of the ACCs were identified as sequence fragments of Pseudomonas, frequently carrying multidrug-related ARGs with a percentage of 80% (Fig. 5). The multidrug resistance genes m exF and hydrophobe_amphiphile efflux-1 (HAE1) family protein were frequently carried by Pseudomonas. Similarly to a previous study, 82% of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from a hospital wastewater treatment plant were resistant to multiple antimicrobial drugs [39]. P. aeruginosa is a notoriously difficult-to-treat pathogen that can cause severe disease and infections. In P. aeruginosa, the efflux mechanism for antibiotic resistance may pose a great challenge to antibiotic development [40]. Thus, the high frequency of ARGs carried by Pseudomonas in drinking water may increase the risk of infection and antibiotic ineffectiveness in human beings. Additionally, all the Methyloversatilis and Polaromonas contigs were observed to carry multidrug- and bacitracin-related ARGs, respectively. Moreover, two contigs were able to be assigned to species level. The contig of P. aeruginosa, S13_contig_64868 carried class A beta-lactamase resistance gene, and S08_contig_54033 annotated as contig of Hylemonella gracilis carried bacitracin undecaprenol kinase. The taxonomic annotation of ACCs greatly strengthens the identification of possible ARG hosts in drinking water samples.
Figure 5
Fig. 5

The taxonomy of ARG-carrying contigs (in genus level) and the percentages of ARG types these contigs carried. a Pie chart shows the taxonomy and percentage of ARG-carrying contigs. For example, Pseudomonas (34.5%) represents that 34.5% of ARG-carrying contigs were annotated as Pseudomonas. b Bar chart shows the percentages of ARGs types that were carried by the annotated ARG-carrying contigs. The percentage of these annotated ARG-carrying contigs was set as 100%. For example, 80% of the ARG-carrying contigs originating from Pseudomonas spp. carried multidrug resistance genes

The spatial distribution of bacterial community

Totally, 26,862 bacterial OTUs were observed in at least one of these tap water samples. Among them, the highest bacterial diversity across all samples, 5018 OTUs, was observed in Tibet tap water of mainland China, followed by 4302 OTUs in water from Xinjiang, and 4262 OTUs in water from Inner Mongolia in northwestern China. The lowest bacterial diversity was observed in Macau (122 OTUs), followed by California of the USA (210 OTUs), and Sichuan province of China (226 OTUs). Based on the OTUs and corresponding abundances, PCoA was performed to compare the spatial variations of bacterial community using weighted Unifrac distance, which considered both species abundance and phylogeny (Additional file 1 Figure S6). Overall, differences in phylogenetic diversity and abundance of OTUs were obvious across drinking water samples. Notably, the composition of bacterial communities was more similar among the triplicated samples collected from the same tap, triplicated DNA extractions from the same sample, DNA extractions using different kits, and triplicated PCRs using primers with different barcodes. Thus, in the present study, DNA extraction strategy and PCR amplifications using primers with different barcodes are not expected to be factors influencing the detection of microbial compositions in tap water samples.

The histogram in Fig. 6 shows the percentages of the top 10 bacterial classes (accounting for a total abundance of 84.8%) that were most abundant within tap water. The most abundant bacterial classes were Alphaproteobacteria, followed by Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. Significantly, the cluster patterns revealed by weighted UniFrac tree (Fig. 6) showed that drinking water sample collected from Macau (S11) closely resembles the sample from California in the USA (S25) based on bacterial community analysis. The Macau and California samples had low OTU diversities of 122 and 210 and had significantly high percentages of Alphaproteobacteria at 99.6 and 90.2%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3, ten OTUs were widely spread with a detection frequency of 80% (20 out of 25 samples), accounting for 16.8% of the total abundance. To further explore the shared, specialist, and generalist bacteria in tap water samples, all of the OTUs that could be annotated at genus level by SSU SILVA database were summarized to obtain the matrix of percentages at genus level in all tap water samples. About 42% of 16S rRNA gene sequences were annotated at genus level (686 genera). Nine genera, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, Acinetobacter, Hyphomicrobium, Planctomyces, Sediminibacterium, Legionella, and Rhodobacter were present in all tap water samples, and the average abundance was 0.7–14.9%. There were 36 generalist genera (occurrence observed in at least 80% of samples) found to be widely present in tap water samples, accounting for total percentage as 84.9%. The most dominant genus, Sphingomonas spp., is known to be aerobic and able to form biofilms. Sphingomonas spp. are often investigated in oligotrophic environments [41] and reported to be present in drinking water distribution systems [10, 42, 43]. However, none of the ACCs identified in the present study were annotated as Sphingomonas (Fig. 5 ), indicating their low frequency of carrying ARGs in drinking water. The dominant genera, Pseudomonas (10.0%), Mycobacterium (3.4%) and Acinetobacter (3.3%), were found to carry aminoglycoside, bacitracin, multidrug, and sulfonamide resistance genes from metagenomic analysis of drinking water samples (Fig. 5 ). Some Pseudomonas spp. (e.g., P. aeruginosa), Mycobacterium spp. (e.g., M. avium), and Acinetobacter spp. (e.g., A. baumannii) have been considered as opportunistic pathogens, and their capacity of thriving in drinking water supply systems could increase the risks of the exposure and spread of ARGs in drinking water. Thus, the dominance of these ARG-carrying bacteria observed in drinking water at the user end should receive more attention, and their potential negative effects merit further study.
Figure 6
Fig. 6

The top 10 bacterial classes in drinking water samples and their cluster patterns. Bar chart shows the average abundance of these top 10 bacterial classes in samples

The horizontal gene transfer potential for ARGs among bacterial population

Previous metagenomic analysis-based study revealed the exchange of ARGs between clinical pathogens and environmental bacteria [44], illustrating that ARGs could be transferred between different environments via specific bacteria, especially pathogens. Another study explored the potential HGT frequency among bacterial populations by using Procrustes analysis, and a low HGT frequency of resistomes (M 2 ≤ 0.5) was observed among soil bacteria [12]. Because drinking water exerts direct exposure to human beings, there is a pressing demand to determine the likelihood of the transmission of ARGs to specific bacteria and the probable hosts of ARGs. Here, network analysis together with Procrustes analysis was applied to explore the correlation between drinking water resistomes and bacterial population (Fig. 7). The modularity index of 0.786 indicated that the formed ARG-bacteria network had a modular structure [45], while positive correlations were frequently found in ARG–ARG and bacteria–bacteria pairings. No significant correlation was observed between ARGs and bacterial population using network analysis. To further validate the absence of significant correlation between ARGs and bacterial population, Procrustes analysis was used based on a one-way ANOVA test with Tukey post-hoc tests [12]. Similarly, the result of Procrustes analysis (M 2 = 0.606, P < 0.01) showed that the ARG content did not correlate with bacterial community, different from the strong correlation observed in soil samples, suggesting the potential of HGT of ARGs in drinking water microbiota [12]. The possible HGT of ARGs indicated by the correlation-based Procrustes analysis in drinking water microbiota may enhance the risks to human health. Thus, further observation and additional analyses are required to study the putative HGT of ARGs in drinking water systems.
Figure 7
Fig. 7

Correlation analysis of ARGs and bacterial community based on network and Procrustes analysis. a. Correlation-based network statistical analysis reveals the co-occurrence patterns among ARG subtypes and bacterial OTUs. The nodes were colored according to modularity class. The size of each node is proportional to its number of connections. The edges present the correlation between two nodes. A connection represents a strong (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient ρ > 0.6) and significant (P value < 0.01) correlation. Modularity index 0.786. b. Procrustes analysis depicts correlation between ARG content (Bray-Curtis) and bacterial community (Bray-Curtis), M 2 = 0.606, P < 0.01

Conclusions

In this study, a catalog of antibiotic resistome in drinking water was established and the host-tracking of ARGs was conducted via a large-scale survey using metagenomic approach. In total, 181 ARG subtypes belonging to 16 ARG types were detected with an abundance range from 2.8 × 10−2 to 4.2 × 10−1 capc. The highest abundance was observed in northern China. The dominant ARGs in the drinking water samples include bacitracin, multidrug, aminoglycoside, sulfonamide, and beta-lactam resistance genes. Moreover, metagenomic assembly based host-tracking revealed that 80% of the ARG-carrying contigs originating from Pseudomonas spp. carried multidrug resistance genes. The findings of this study should propel the global surveillance and risk assessment of ARGs in drinking water onto the agendas of water supply authorities. This will aid to prevent both the proliferation of ARGs in drinking water and their horizontal transfer to pathogenic microbes that might cause more cases of antibiotic ineffectiveness and threat to public health.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Yuanqing Chao, Ke Yu, Yanping Mao, Anni Zhang, Yuchen Pang, Yu Deng, Wenjun Sun, Jun Yang, Yuanyuan Wei, and Ying Yang for their help with sample collection.

Funding

We thank the Hong Kong General Research Fund (172057/15E) and the Shenzhen Knowledge Innovation Program-Basic Research Project (JCYJ20150831192847649) for financially supporting this study. Dr. Liping Ma and Dr. Yu Xia thank the University of Hong Kong for the postdoctoral fellowship. Mr. Xiao-Tao Jiang, Mr. Yu-Lin Wang, and Mr. An-Dong Li thank the University of Hong Kong for the postgraduate studentships. The authors also would like to thank the reviewers of this manuscript for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Availability of data and materials

The sequence data sets generated from the tap water samples were deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Reads Archive database (NCBI SRA) under the BioProject of PRJNA305188, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/. The non-redundant ARG database and all the customized scripts used for sequencing analysis in this study are available via https://github.com/cherrymaryma/ARGs-in-drinking-water.

Authors’ contributions

MLP and LB contributed equally to this work. MLP, LB, and ZT designed this study. All co-author joined the tap water collection. MLP, LB, and ZT contributed to drafting the initial manuscript, and all co-authors revised, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The manuscript does not report data collected from humans or animals.

Consent for publication

The manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
(2)
Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China

References

  1. Hatosy SM, Martiny AC. The ocean as a global reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes. Appl Environ Microb. 2015;81(21):7593–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Frey SK, Topp E, Khan IUH, Ball BR, Edwards M, Gottschall N, Sunohara M, Lapen DR. Quantitative Campylobacter spp., antibiotic resistance genes, and veterinary antibiotics in surface and ground water following manure application: influence of tile drainage control. Sci Total Environ. 2015;532:138–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergeron S, Boopathy R, Nathaniel R, Corbin A, LaFleur G. Presence of antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in raw source water and treated drinking water. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2015;102:370–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Segawa T, Takeuchi N, Rivera A, Yamada A, Yoshimura Y, Barcaza G, Shinbori K, Motoyama H, Kohshima S, Ushida K. Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in glacier environments. Env Microbiol Rep. 2013;5(1):127–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang XX, Zhang T, Fang H. Antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2009;82(3):397–414.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen BW, Yuan K, Chen X, Yang Y, Zhang T, Wang YW, Luan TG, Zou SC, Li XD. Metagenomic analysis revealing antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and their genetic compartments in the Tibetan environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(13):6670–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ma LP, Xia Y, Li B, Yang Y, Li LG, Tiedje JM, Zhang T. Metagenomic assembly reveals hosts of antibiotic resistance genes and the shared resistome in pig, chicken and human feces. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(1):420–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao YQ, Ma LP, Yang Y, Ju F, Zhang XX, Wu WM, Zhang T. Metagenomic analysis reveals significant changes of microbial compositions and protective functions during drinking water treatment. Sci Rep-UK. 2013;3:3550.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Shi P, Jia SY, Zhang XX, Zhang T, Cheng SP, Li AM. Metagenomic insights into chlorination effects on microbial antibiotic resistance in drinking water. Water Res. 2013;47(1):111–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jia SY, Shi P, Hu Q, Li B, Zhang T, Zhang XX. Bacterial community shift drives antibiotic resistance promotion during drinking water chlorination. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(20):12271–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xi CW, Zhang YL, Marrs CF, Ye W, Simon C, Foxman B, Nriagu J. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in drinking water treatment and distribution systems. Appl Environ Microb. 2009;75(17):5714–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsberg KJ, Patel S, Gibson MK, Lauber CL, Knight R, Fierer N, Dantas G. Bacterial phylogeny structures soil resistomes across habitats. Nature. 2014;509(7502):612–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(17):5112–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang Y, Li B, Ju F, Zhang T. Exploring variation of antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge over a four-year period through a metagenomic approach. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(18):10197–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu B, Pop M. ARDB-antibiotic resistance genes database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D443–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li B, Yang Y, Ma LP, Ju F, Guo F, Tiedje JM, Zhang T. Metagenomic and network analysis reveal wide distribution and co-occurrence of environmental antibiotic resistance genes. ISME J. 2015;9(11):2490–502.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang Y, Jiang XT, Chai BL, Ma LP, Li B, Zhang AN, Cole JR, Tiedje JM, Zhang T. ARGs-OAP: online analysis pipeline for antibiotic resistance genes detection from metagenomic data using an integrated structured ARG-database. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(15):2346–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Angly FE, Dennis PG, Skarshewski A, Vanwonterghem I, Hegenholtz P, Tyson GW. CopyRighter: a rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome. 2014;2(1):11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA—a practical iterative de Bruijn graph de novo assembler. Lect N Bioinformat. 2010;6044:426–40.Google Scholar
  21. Hu YF, Yang X, Qin JJ, Lu N, Cheng G, Wu N, Pan YL, Li J, Zhu LY, Wang X, Meng ZQ, Zhao FQ, Liu D, Ma JC, Qin N, Xiang CS, Xiao YH, Li LJ, Yang HM, Wang J, Yang RF, Gao GF, Wang J, Zhu B. Metagenome-wide analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in a large cohort of human gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mao YP, Xia Y, Wang ZP, Zhang T. Reconstructing a Thauera genome from a hydrogenotrophic-denitrifying consortium using metagenomic sequence data. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2014;98(15):6885–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh HJ, Weber N, Schuster SC. Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res. 2011;21(9):1552–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishii S, Suzuki S, Norden-Krichmar TM, Tenney A, Chain PSG, Scholz MB, Nealson KH, Bretschger O. A novel metatranscriptomic approach to identify gene expression dynamics during extracellular electron transfer. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ju F, Xia Y, Guo F, Wang ZP, Zhang T. Taxonomic relatedness shapes bacterial assembly in activated sludge of globally distributed wastewater treatment plants. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(8):2421–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Barberan A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 2012;6(2):343–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological. 1995;57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
  28. Zhang QQ, Ying GG, Pan CG, Liu YS, Zhao JL. Comprehensive evaluation of antibiotics emission and fate in the river basins of China: source analysis, multimedia modeling, and linkage to bacterial resistance. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(11):6772–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Andersson DI, Hughes D. Persistence of antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(5):901–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Loveland-Curtze J, Miteva VI, Brenchley JE. Herminiimonas glaciei sp nov., a novel ultramicrobacterium from 3042 m deep Greenland glacial ice. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2009;59:1272–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chaturvedi P, Reddy GSN, Shivaji S. Dyadobacter hamtensis sp. nov., from Hamta glacier, located in the Himalayas, India. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2005;55:2113–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sreedharan K, Philip R, Singh ISB. Virulence potential and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of motile Aeromonads associated with freshwater ornamental fish culture systems: a possible threat to public health. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43(2):754–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu Q, Zhang XX, Jia SY, Huang KL, Tang JY, Shi P, Ye L, Ren HQ. Metagenomic insights into ultraviolet disinfection effects on antibiotic resistome in biologically treated wastewater. Water Res. 2016;101:309–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Volkmann H, Schwartz T, Bischoff P, Kirchen S, Obst U. Detection of clinically relevant antibiotic-resistance genes in municipal wastewater using real-time PCR (TaqMan). J Microbiol Meth. 2004;56(2):277–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith MS, Yang RK, Knapp CW, Niu YF, Peak N, Hanfelt MM, Galland JC, Graham DW. Quantification of tetracycline resistance genes in feedlot lagoons by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microb. 2004;70(12):7372–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiang L, Hu XL, Xu T, Zhang HC, Sheng D, Yin DQ. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and their relationship with antibiotics in the Huangpu River and the drinking water sources, shanghai, China. Sci Total Environ. 2013;458:267–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohler T, MicheaHamzehpour M, Henze U, Gotoh N, Curty LK, Pechere JC. Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 1997;23(2):345–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tosini F, Visca P, Luzzi I, Dionisi AM, Pezzella C, Petrucca A, Carattoli A. Class 1 integron-borne multiple-antibiotic resistance carried by IncFI and IncL/M plasmids in Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 1998;42(12):3053–8.Google Scholar
  39. Miranda CC, de Filippis I, Pinto LH, Coelho-Souza T, Bianco K, Cacci LC, Picao RC, Clementino MM. Genotypic characteristics of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospital wastewater treatment plant in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;118(6):1276–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Winkler ML, Papp-Wallace KM, Hujer AM, Domitrovic TN, Hujer KM, Hurless KN, Tuohy M, Hall G, Bonomo RA. Unexpected challenges in treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam in archived isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2015;59(2):1020–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Glaeser SP, Kampfer P. The prokaryotes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  42. Koskinen R, Ali-Vehmas T, Kampfer P, Laurikkala M, Tsitko I, Kostyal E, Atroshi F, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Characterization of Sphingomonas isolates from Finnish and Swedish drinking water distribution systems. J Appl Microbiol. 2000;89(4):687–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ling F, Hwang C, LeChevallier WM, Andersen GL, Liu W-T. Core-satellite populations and seasonality of water meter biofilms in a metropolitan drinking water distribution system. The ISME journal. 2015;1751-7362(15):1–14.Google Scholar
  44. Forsberg KJ, Reyes A, Wang B, Selleck EM, Sommer MO, Dantas G. The shared antibiotic resistome of soil bacteria and human pathogens. Science. 2012;337(6098):1107–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman MEJ. Modularity and community structure in networks. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(23):8577–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us