Open Access

Correction to: Towards a balanced view of the bacterial tree of life

  • Frederik Schulz1Email author,
  • Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh1,
  • Robert M. Bowers1,
  • Jessica Jarett1,
  • Torben Nielsen1,
  • Natalia N. Ivanova1,
  • Nikos C. Kyrpides1 and
  • Tanja Woyke1Email author
Microbiome20175:149

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0367-2

Received: 1 November 2017

Accepted: 1 November 2017

Published: 15 November 2017

The original article was published in Microbiome 2017 5:140

Correction

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors pointed out that the figure shown as figure S1 is actually figure S2 and vice versa. Figure S1 should show the barcharts, and figure S2 should shows the heatmaps. Figures captions are in the correct order.

1) “...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3: Figure S2 )...” - > ...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3: Figure S1 )...”

2) “...in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S1 ).” - > “in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2 ).”

3) “...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3: Figure S2 , ...” - > “...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3: Figure S1 , ...”

4) “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3: Figure S2 )” - > “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3: Figure S1 )”.

Correction

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors pointed out that the figure shown as figure S1 is actually figure S2 and vice versa. Figure S1 should show the barcharts, and figure S2 should shows the heatmaps. Figure captions are in the correct order.
  1. 1)

    “...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3: Figure S2 )...” - > “...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3: Figure S1 )...”

     
  2. 2)

    “...in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S1 ).” -> “in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2 ).”

     
  3. 3)

    “...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3: Figure S2 , ...” -> “...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3: Figure S1 , ...”

     
  4. 4)

    “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3: Figure S2 )” -> “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3: Figure S1 )”

     

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute

Reference

  1. Schulz F, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Bowers RM, Jarett J, Nielsen T, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T. Towards a balanced view of the bacterial tree of life. Microbiome. 2017;5:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0360-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement