Open Access

Recent urbanization in China is correlated with a Westernized microbiome encoding increased virulence and antibiotic resistance genes

Microbiome20175:121

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0338-7

Received: 19 June 2017

Accepted: 6 September 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Urbanization is associated with an increased risk for a number of diseases, including obesity, diabetes, and cancer, which all also show associations with the microbiome. While microbial community composition has been shown to vary across continents and in traditional versus Westernized societies, few studies have examined urban-rural differences in neighboring communities within a single country undergoing rapid urbanization. In this study, we compared the gut microbiome, plasma metabolome, dietary habits, and health biomarkers of rural and urban people from a single Chinese province.

Results

We identified significant differences in the microbiota and microbiota-related plasma metabolites in rural versus recently urban subjects from the Hunan province of China. Microbes with higher relative abundance in Chinese urban samples have been associated with disease in other studies and were substantially more prevalent in the Human Microbiome Project cohort of American subjects. Furthermore, using whole metagenome sequencing, we found that urbanization was associated with a loss of microbial diversity and changes in the relative abundances of Viruses, Archaea, and Bacteria. Gene diversity, however, increased with urbanization, along with the proportion of reads associated with antibiotic resistance and virulence, which were strongly correlated with the presence of Escherichia and Shigella.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that urbanization has produced convergent evolution of the gut microbial composition in American and urban Chinese populations, resulting in similar compositional patterns of abundant microbes through similar lifestyles on different continents, including a loss of potentially beneficial bacteria and an increase in potentially harmful genes via increased relative abundance of Escherichia and Shigella.

Keywords

MicrobiomeUrbanizationChinaMetagenomicsMetabolome

Background

As the global population expands and develops, increasing numbers of individuals are transitioning from traditional rural to Westernized urban lifestyles. These changes are associated with increased crowding, altered diet, declines in physical activity, and increased risk of diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [13]. However, the effect of urbanization on the microbiome, the set of microorganisms that lives on or in a person, and how this affects disease risk, has not been explored in detail.

The microbiome plays a crucial role in host function. Dysbiosis of the microbiota has been associated with a number of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, obesity, and cancer [47], which are also associated with a Western lifestyle. Previous studies have shown some modest associations between the microbiome and diet [811]. However, in all of these studies, which focused on subjects living similar lifestyles in the same geographical regions, the changes in microbial composition did not overcome inter-individual variation. In contrast, differences in microbial composition become much more pronounced when comparing geographically and culturally distant populations [1215]. Few studies have addressed urban-rural differences in the microbial and metabolic composition of individuals living within a similar geographic area who share similar ethnicity and diet. This is especially true of recently urbanizing environments. Here, we look at the early stages of how the microbial community evolves in response to recent urbanization.

China is an ideal place to analyze the complex interaction of microbiome, disease, and urbanization, as many areas within this country have only recently (in the past 20 years) started to undergo massive urbanization, and within a single region, one can still find a mix of traditional rural and more Westernized urban lifestyles [16]. This is particularly true in the predominantly Han region of Southern China, which has large variation in timing of major urbanization-related changes. In this study, we analyzed the microbiome and metabolome of 40 subjects from Hunan province, 20 recently urbanized subjects, and 20 rural subjects. By focusing on urban-rural differences in the microbiota and metabolites of a single province, we were able to capture early alterations in response to urbanization, as well as eliminate some of the confounding factors in previous studies, such as ethnicity, geography, and regional dietary patterns. Our results suggest the possibility of a loss of beneficial microbes associated with urbanization, with a concomitant increase in potentially dangerous genes, leading to a more Westernized microbiome.

Results

Urbanization is associated with a shift in microbial community composition towards commonly observed Western gut microbes

We compared 20 urban subjects from a city of 7 million to 20 rural subjects living in a small village in Hunan province. The urban sample had a higher disposable income and population but lower birth and population growth rate (Table 1). Furthermore, the urban subjects had higher body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and insulin levels, consistent with studies showing an association between urbanization, obesity, and diabetes [17].
Table 1

Characteristics of the populations studied

 

Rural

Urban

Adjusted P value

Community characteristics

 Population

26,563

7,000,000

 

 Persons per square kilometer

668

13,150

 

 Average disposable income

$800

$5600

 

 Birth rate per 1000

11.7

8.7

 

 Population growth rate per 1000

5.8

4.5

 

Subject characteristics

 Total number subjects

20

20

 

 Number (%) female

5 (25%)

13 (65%)

 

 Mean (std) age range

50.6 (11.7)

58.9 (10.99)

 

Significant differences in metadata

 Insulin (μU/mL)

4.31

9.84

0.0003

 Waist circumference (cm)

73.78

85.03

0.0104

 BMI (kg/m2)

21.09

24.45

0.0104

 HbA1c (%)

5.65

6.63

0.0147

The mean of the community characteristics and metadata is shown. Only metadata variables significant after correction for multiple hypothesis testing are shown. See Additional file 6: Table S2H for all metadata variables tested

We used 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing of fecal samples to assess the gut microbial community of our subjects at two timepoints, separated by 2 weeks (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). Similar to others [18], we found strong correlations between the samples taken at the two timepoints (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Using mixed linear models with urban/rural and time as fixed effects and subject id as a random effect, we found significant differences associated with urban vs. rural status in the first multidimensional scaling (MDS) axis at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU), genus, and family level (Fig. 1g). These differences became much less pronounced at the higher phylogenetic levels of phylum, class, and order. Our observation of increased separation at lower phylogenetic levels is supported by using a random forest classifier (Fig. 1h), which showed that when predicting urban vs. rural status, the area under the curve (AUC) increased with more refined taxonomic levels, with an AUC of over 70%, starting with the family level, suggesting that microbiome composition as measured by 16S rRNA sequencing can be used to differentiate urban and rural subjects at the family level or lower taxonomic levels. In addition, these findings are independent of method and could be reproduced using alternative tools for taxonomic assignment (Additional file 3: Figure S2) and classification (Additional file 4: Figure S3). Intriguingly, while the urban samples had more diversity at the higher taxonomic levels (Fig. 1 and Additional file 5: Figure S4), richness trended opposite to the diversity measures (Additional file 5: Figure S4B), suggesting that this difference is driven by differences in evenness. Taken together, our results suggest that there are significant differences between rural and urban samples that overcame inter-individual variation, but become much less pronounced at higher taxonomic levels.
Fig. 1

Differences in microbial composition between urban and rural Chinese subjects. a-f PCoA plot and comparison of Shannon diversity index for each taxonomic level, based on sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. Points are colored by urban/rural status and shaped by timepoint (each subject gave two samples, separated by 2 weeks). Key is in the top right. Numbers in parentheses on the PCoA axes indicate the percent variation explained by that axis. g P values comparing the position on the first PCoA axis of urban and rural samples. The gray region indicates significant P values (p < 0.05). h ROC curve using leave-one-out predictions of urban or rural status using a random forest classifier. The area under the curve (AUC) is indicated in the legend

Using our models, there was one phylum, one family, four genera, and 25 OTUs significantly different between rural and urban subjects after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing (Fig. 2a; Additional file 6: Table S2). To further characterize differences between the rural and urban samples, we used the consensus sequences generated by our de novo OTU pipeline as query sequences to search databases of 16S rRNA sequences. Using an unadjusted (uncorrected for false discovery rate) threshold of p < 0.05, we mapped the 80 consensus sequences representing OTUs with higher relative abundance in rural samples and the 91 OTUs with higher relative abundance in urban samples to the SILVA database, which contains ~ 1.7 million known 16S rRNA sequences [19] (Fig. 2b). For both rural and urban OTUs, the percent identity to a previously identified sequence was > 99% and there was no significant difference between the percent identities in the taxa higher in rural or urban samples (p > 0.05 by the unpaired Wilcoxon test). In contrast, taxa higher in urban samples were significantly (p < 0.001) better represented among the 2767 finished bacterial genomes that have been deposited at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) Genome (Fig. 2c). Thus, although we found little evidence of novel taxa, the genomes of taxa higher in urban subjects have been better characterized by whole genome sequencing projects.
Fig. 2

The urban Chinese microbiome is significantly more prevalent in an American cohort than the rural Chinese microbiome. a Heatmap showing the mean log normalized relative abundance from sequencing the 16S rRNA gene at timepoints 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) of taxa significantly different (adjusted p < 0.05) between urban and rural samples after correction for multiple hypothesis testing, based on our mixed linear models with urban/rural and time as fixed effects and subject id as a random effect. Within each taxonomic level, taxa are given from most to least significant between urban and rural samples. No taxa were significant at the class or order level. At the OTU level, the genus and consensus number is given. At all other levels, the name of the taxon is given. 8 taxa were tested at the phylum level, 16 at the class level, 22 at the order level, 40 at the family level, 86 at the genus level, and 703 at the OTU level. Full details for each taxon, including mean and standard deviation, P values and model R 2 are given in Additional file 6: Table S2A–F. b-e We used the consensus sequences from the 80 OTUs higher in rural samples and 91 OTUs higher in urban samples identified from our mixed linear models (unadjusted p < 0.05) as query sequences against different 16S rRNA databases. b OTUs higher in rural and urban communities are present in the SILVA database of full-length 16S rRNA sequences at similar levels of identity (p = 0.08 by unpaired Wilcoxon test). c OTUs higher in urban subjects are better represented in the NCBI collection of finished bacterial genomes than OTUs higher in rural subjects (p = 0.0008). d OTUs higher in rural and urban communities have previously been found in the Human Microbiome Project (HMP), a study of healthy American subjects, at similar levels of identity (p = 0.88), but (e) OTUs higher in urban subjects are seen in a greater proportion of HMP subjects compared to OTUs higher in rural subjects (p = 7.9 × 10−14). ***p < 0.001, ****p < 10−13

In order to compare our Chinese cohort to a Western cohort, we mapped taxa higher in rural or urban samples to their nearest taxa as represented by consensus sequences from the Human Microbiome Project (HMP), which analyzed the microbiomes of healthy subjects living in the United States [20]. Similar to our findings with the SILVA database, we found no significant difference between how well taxa higher in rural or urban samples could be mapped to the HMP taxa (Fig. 2d). However, there was a substantial difference (p < 10−13) between how prevalent the closest matching taxa within the HMP were (Fig. 2e). The nearest matching HMP taxa was present in an average of 30.1% of HMP subjects for taxa higher in rural samples, compared to 63.7% for taxa higher in urban samples. This suggests that urbanization in China is associated with an increase in microbes that are present in higher numbers of people in Western (urbanized) America. Furthermore, we found differences in prevalence at P values above our 0.05 threshold, suggesting that a larger study would have resulted in more OTUs significantly different between rural and urban than the 25 OTUs we reported (Additional file 7: Figure S5).

The metabolome is strongly correlated with urbanization

Metabolites are another sensitive marker of the host’s state [21]. In fact, previous studies have found that the metabolome changes more rapidly than the microbiome in response to host perturbations, such as diet change, suggesting that early response to host changes is transmitted through changes in microbial gene expression more than microbial composition [10, 22]. Due to our finding that the microbiome was stable across timepoints, we generated metabolite data corresponding to the first timepoint from our analysis of the microbiome. We found significant differences between urban and rural metabolite composition (Fig. 3a) that were independent of analysis method (Additional file 8: Figure S6), although there was no difference in the diversity of the metabolome. Furthermore, our machine learning classifier was even better at predicting urban/rural status from the metabolome than the microbiome (Fig. 3b). At an FDR-adjusted P value of p < 0.05, there were 16 metabolites significantly associated with urban vs. rural status (Fig. 3c; Additional file 6: Table S2G). Ten of the 16 significantly different metabolites were involved in lipid, carbohydrate, and energy metabolism—all key differences in Western (urban) versus traditional Chinese (rural) diets—and a smaller proportion related to peptides, nucleotides, and amino acids, with one xenobiotic (theophylline). Thus, the metabolome appears to respond to urbanization and Western diet even more robustly than the microbiome.
Fig. 3

Differences in metabolites between urban and rural Chinese subjects. a PCoA plot comparing metabolites between urban (red) and rural (blue) samples. Numbers in parentheses indicate the percent variation explained by that axis. The urban/rural P value was 0.02 for MDS1 and 1.5 × 10−7 for MDS2. b ROC curve using leave-one-out predictions of urban or rural status using a random forest classifier. The area under the curve (AUC) is indicated in the legend. c Heatmap showing the mean scaled abundance of metabolites statistically significantly different between urban and rural samples after correction for multiple hypothesis testing (adjusted p < 0.05). Metabolites are given from most to least significant. 334 different biochemicals were tested (see Additional file 6: Table S2G for more details, including mean and standard deviation, P values and model R 2)

In addition, we collected metadata on diet and other variables, such as anti- or probiotic use, anthropometric measures, arsenic exposure, and several biomarkers for cardiometabolic disease (Additional file 6: Table S2H). These data were also able to relatively accurately predict urban/rural status (Fig. 3b, Table 1), even though significant (adjusted P values <0.05) urban/rural differences were only seen in the diabetes and obesity measures. These measures were all higher in urban subjects, suggesting that the risk of diabetes and obesity has increased in our urban population. Of note, none of the diet variables (taken as an average over 3 days) was significantly different between the two groups.

Intriguingly, combining the microbiome data with the metadata or metabolite data decreased the ability of the classifier to distinguish between urban and rural populations, while combining the metadata and metabolite data gave an AUC of 92% (Fig. 3b), the highest out of all other combinations of the microbiome, metabolome, and metadata. Likewise, there were few associations between the microbiome and metadata or metabolome. For example, only five metadata variables were associated with any taxa: antibiotic use in the last 6 months (associated with 18 taxa), use of probiotic supplements (associated with three OTUs), insulin levels (associated with two OTUs), and gender and fat intake (each associated with one OTU; Additional file 9: Table S3). In contrast, there were 133 associations between the metadata and metabolome (Additional file 9: Table S3C). A few of these correlated variables measured the same value in different ways, such as glucose, which was measured both as an independent blood test in the metadata and as a metabolite in our metabolomics data (Additional file 10: Figure S7). This strong correlation in the variables measured in two independent ways validates our metabolomic methods. The majority of the statistically significant associations between the metabolites and the metadata, however, revealed intriguing novel associations between the metabolome and health. For example, among our 133 statistically significant associations, 106 (80%) fell into the amino acid, carbohydrate, lipid, and peptide superpathways. The eight metabolites associated with BMI, waist or weight were all in the peptide, amino acid, or carbohydrate superpathways. The 23 metabolites associated with glucose, HbA1c, and insulin largely fell in glucose metabolism pathways, while the 17 metabolites associated with cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL largely fell in lipid metabolism pathways.

The relative abundance of Viruses and Archaea is decreased in urban subjects

While 16S rRNA sequencing can provide valuable insights into which bacteria are present in the microbiome, whole genome sequencing can provide a more complete taxonomic and functional representation of the microbial community. We therefore also performed whole metagenome sequencing of the samples from the first timepoint, generating 10 million reads per sample (Additional file 1: Table S1). These data confirmed the significant difference in microbial composition seen in the lower taxonomic levels by 16S rRNA sequencing (Fig. 4). However, with whole genome sequencing, we saw separation between urban and rural samples at all taxonomic levels, including domain. This increased separation at the higher taxonomic levels may be due to the additional taxa detected at each level with the more sensitive whole genome sequencing (Additional file 11: Table S4).
Fig. 4

Viruses and Archaea are less abundant in the urban Chinese microbiome while Bacteria are more abundant. a–g PCoA plot and comparison of Shannon diversity index for each taxonomic level, based on whole genome sequencing. Blue points indicate rural subjects while red points indicate urban subjects. Numbers in parentheses on the PCoA axes indicate the percent variation explained by that axis. h P values comparing the position on the first PCoA axis (solid line) or Shannon diversity (dashed line) of urban and rural subjects. The gray region indicates significant P values (p < 0.05). i Comparison of the logged relative abundance of each domain detected using whole genome sequencing. An asterisk (*) in i indicates a Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted P value of less than 0.05

In addition, we found that at every taxonomic level urban subjects had decreased diversity, consistent with other studies showing loss of diversity with Westernization [12, 13]. This was also true for other diversity measures (Additional file 12: Figure S8), but is opposite what was seen for our 16S rRNA Shannon diversity measures, where urban subjects had higher diversity at the upper taxonomic levels, with no significant difference or lower diversity at the lower taxonomic levels (Fig. 1 and Additional file 5: Figure S4). However, richness from the 16S rRNA analysis was decreased in urban samples (Additional file 5: Figure S4B), similar to the whole genome sequencing results. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that at higher phylogenetic levels changes in evenness in a few dominant taxa drive our observed differences in 16S diversity. These dominant taxa may be a result of 16S rRNA sequencing bias. In contrast, there appear to be fewer dominant taxa in the whole genome sequencing data, which detected many more taxa at each phylogenetic level compared to 16S rRNA sequencing (Additional file 11: Table S4), and provides a more consistent view of decreased diversity with urbanization across all phylogenetic levels, no matter which diversity measurement is used.

Using our linear models on the taxonomic data generated from our whole metagenome sequencing, we detected 60 species, 44 genera, 71 families, 35 orders, 21 classes, 9 phyla, and 3 domains significantly different between urban and rural subjects after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing (Additional file 13: Table S5A-G). Most of these taxa were more abundant in rural subjects, further supporting the hypothesis that urbanization is associated with a loss of potentially beneficial bacteria (Additional file 14: Figure S9). Interestingly, all three domains detected (Bacteria, Archaea, and Virus) were significantly different between urban and rural subjects (Fig. 4i), suggesting that urbanization results in an overall loss of Archaea and Viruses and a very small but significant increase in the relative abundance of Bacteria. Archaea are an understudied part of the microbiome, but are generally methanogens. They have been associated with leanness and archaebiotics have been proposed to modulate the risk of atherosclerosis [23, 24]. Likewise, the virome has not been as well characterized, and although many well-known viruses cause disease, some viruses can replace the beneficial functions of commensal bacteria [25, 26].

As with the 16S rRNA sequencing results, there were a number of intriguing associations between the relative abundance of taxa and metabolites (Additional file 15: Table S6A). For example, 10-undecenoate (11:1n1) was positively associated with the family Leuconostocaceae or other taxa belonging to this family in both 16S rRNA and whole genome sequencing. Leuconostocaceae are lactic acid bacteria previously shown to undergo niche-specific evolution [27] and are associated with ulcerative colitis [28], while 10-undecennoate (11:1n1) has been associated with colorectal cancer [29]. In contrast, there were only 16 associations between taxa and the metadata: most were associations with antibiotic use in the past 6 months; although the Archaea domain was associated with sodium intake, the Melisococcus genus and one of its species was associated with probiotic supplements, and one phage was associated with HDL (high density lipoprotein cholesterol; Additional file 15: Table S6B). Thus, urban/rural status is strongly associated with microbial composition as measured by whole-genome shotgun sequencing, confirming our observations from sequencing the 16S rRNA gene, including dysbiosis in the relative abundance of entire taxonomic domains.

Urban subjects have increased gene diversity, including increased antibiotic resistance

We also used our whole genome sequencing data to analyze the relative abundance of KEGG modules and pathways (Fig. 5). Again, we saw a significant separation between urban and rural samples, indicating that the gene content is changing with the altered microbial composition. Intriguingly, the urban samples had increased diversity compared to rural samples, opposite the results seen from the whole genome sequencing taxonomic results, which were generated from the same reads (Figs. 4 and 5, Additional file 12: Figure S8 and Additional file 16: Figure S10). Given this finding, for each OTU, we looked at the number of annotated genes contained in the closest finished NCBI bacterial genome (Fig. 2c). We found that the taxa higher in urban samples also contained more annotated genes than the taxa higher in rural samples (Additional file 17: Figure S11). Taken together, this suggests that urban subjects have lost diversity in terms of microbial composition, but the taxa that are present encode more KEGG functions.
Fig. 5

The microbiome of urban Chinese subjects encodes more genetic diversity, including more genes conferring antibiotic resistance, than rural Chinese subjects. a PCoA plot and comparison of Shannon diversity index for KEGG modules and b KEGG pathways. Blue points indicate rural subjects while red points indicate urban subjects. Numbers in parentheses on the PCoA axes indicate the percent variation explained by that axis. c P values comparing the position on the first PCoA axis (solid line) or Shannon diversity (dashed line) of urban and rural subjects. The gray region indicates significant P values (p < 0.05). d–e Comparison of the proportion of reads from whole genome sequencing that aligned to (d) the CARD protein homolog database [31] or e MvirDB [32]. The asterisk (*) in d indicates a P value of less than 0.05 comparing urban and rural subjects (p = 0.01), while two asterisks (**) in e indicates a P value of less than 0.01 (p = 0.006)

There were 10 modules and 51 pathways significantly different between urban and rural subjects, many of which were involved with metabolism, helping to confirm our metabolite findings (Additional file 13: Table S5H-I). For example, M00048 (inosine monophosphate biosynthesis) was one of the modules significantly more abundant in rural samples while the metabolite inosine was also significantly higher in rural samples. Likewise, ko00280 (valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation) was significantly lower in rural samples, while the metabolite gamma-glutamylvaline, which is likely a short-lived intermediate from protein degradation on the way to specific amino acid degradation, was also significantly lower in rural subjects, suggesting a decrease in valine degradation [30]. While the majority of these KEGG functions were more abundant in rural samples, the proportion of significant functions higher in rural was not as pronounced as in the taxonomic results (Additional file 18: Figure S12). Twenty-three modules and 4 pathways were associated with our metadata, including many of the three-day dietary measures, while 139 modules and 9 pathways were associated with metabolite data, suggesting a stronger interaction between gene content, diet, and metabolites than what was seen with the taxonomic data (Additional file 15: Table S6C-D).

One set of genes of particular interest when comparing urban versus rural participants is the genes encoding antibiotic resistance. To analyze the presence of antibiotic resistance in the microbiome, we mapped all reads from our whole genome sequencing analysis to the comprehensive antibiotic resistance protein homolog database (CARD) [31]. Genes in this database are genes whose presence confers antibiotic resistance, such as β-lactamases. We found that significantly more reads from urban subjects mapped to the database than rural subjects (Fig. 5d), suggesting that urbanization is associated with increased antibiotic resistance, even though antibiotic use was not different between the two groups (no subject had taken antibiotics in the past 3 months and only three had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months, two of which were rural and the other urban). Of the three urban samples with the highest rates of antibiotic resistance genes, only one had taken antibiotics in the past 6 months. Furthermore, if we remove the three urban samples with the highest proportion of reads mapped to CARD, we still get a P value of 0.05, suggesting these results are not driven entirely by these three points. Taken together, our results may have important implications for the efficacy of antibiotics in treating infections in the urban population, as many antibiotic resistance genes are encoded on plasmids and easily move between bacterial strains. Thus, some of the increased gene content in urban subjects encodes genes that could potentially harm the host.

When we looked for associations between the proportion of reads that mapped to antibiotic resistance genes and our microbiome, metadata, and metabolite data, we found no significant associations between the metabolite data or metadata. In contrast, 80 KEGG modules and 135 KEGG pathways were significantly associated with the proportion of reads that mapped to antibiotic resistance genes (Additional file 19: Table S7). In considering the associations between the proportion of antibiotic resistant reads and taxonomy, we found that most of the significant associations with the proportion of reads that mapped to antibiotic resistance genes were with Escherichia and Shigella in both our 16S rRNA and whole genome sequencing data (Additional file 20: Figure S13; Additional file 19: Table S7A–B). Intriguingly, a significant association appeared in all OTUs or species classified as belonging to these genera, and in all higher taxonomic levels that these genera belong to. Many of these taxa were significantly higher in urban subjects in the 16S rRNA analysis and trended towards higher relative abundance in the whole genome sequencing data. Taken together, these data demonstrate associations between urbanization, an increased relative abundance of Escherichia and Shigella and an increased proportion of reads mapping to antibiotic resistance genes. Our data are therefore consistent with a hypothesis that during urbanization, these genera become more abundant, bringing with them genes that result in increased antibiotic resistance.

In order to further assess the presence of genes associated with virulence and pathogenicity, the whole genome sequencing reads were also aligned to MvirDB [32], a database that combines genes associated with virulence factors, toxins, and pathogen-host interactions. As with the CARD database, we found that a significantly higher proportion of reads aligned to MvirDB in urban subjects than rural subjects (Fig. 5e). This was true even after removing the three urban samples with the highest proportion of mapped reads. In addition, similar to the CARD findings, there was a strong association between the proportion of reads mapped to MvirDB and Escherichia and Shigella (Additional file 21: Table S8). Taken together, these data suggest a model in which urbanization results in a Westernization of the gut microbiome, resulting in loss of taxonomic diversity but increase in gene diversity, including loss of Viruses and Archaea but increased antibiotic resistance and virulence, suggesting a loss of microbes beneficial to the host with a gain in potentially deleterious genes, which may be caused by an increase in Escherichia and Shigella.

Discussion

We have found significant differences between rural and urban subjects in both microbiome community composition, as measured by both 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing, and microbiome gene content. In particular, urbanization was associated with decreased microbial diversity, including a loss of Viruses and Archaea. This dysbiosis in non-bacterial domains is highlighted by the fact that differences between urban and rural subjects as measured by 16S rRNA sequencing, which can only capture Bacteria, did not propagate above the family level. This contrasts previous studies that found pronounced microbiome differences at all taxonomic levels, even using 16S rRNA sequencing. However, those studies compared samples from different continents, genetic backgrounds, and social practices [1215]. In fact, studies focusing on urban and rural differences within Asia found that the microbiome clusters strongly by ethnicity and geography and not by social and dietary lifestyles [33, 34]. Our focus on two neighboring Han communities enabled us to control for differences in ethnicity, geography, and regional dietary patterns and enabled us to find differences even in our recently urbanized populations.

We have done our best to control for diet, antibiotic use, and other potentially confounding factors by showing that our metadata is not significantly different between the two populations, but there always remains the chance that there is some additional variable that can contribute to urban-rural differences that a larger study will be able to identify. Our study made extensive utilization of linear models; however, our linear model P values are highly correlated with our nonparametric tests (Additional file 22: Supplemental Text; Additional file 23: Table S9), indicating that lack of normality is not what is driving our results. Given our small sample size of 20 subjects per group, we utilized FDR correction separately for each taxonomic level and did not pool hypotheses across our metabolite, 16S and whole-genome sequencing results for correction. This strategy is anticonservative and increases the chance that some of the associations we report with individual taxa, genes, and metabolites may be the results of overfitting. However, we also identified strong differences between urban and rural community compositions that do not require extensive correction for multiple hypotheses, such as analysis of PCoA axes and the results of machine learning algorithms. So while the results we report for individual taxa, metabolites, and genes will ultimately require validation in a larger cohort, we are confident that the overall differences we report between rural and urban populations are not simply a result of our multiple hypothesis correction strategy. Furthermore, a recent observation in mice found that changes in microbial composition in response to altered diet increase with each generation [35], so we predict that as we continue to sample these urbanizing populations over time, the microbial differences will become more pronounced. Thus, our study may represent an observation of the early steps towards a fully Westernized gut microbial composition in China.

Of particular interest is our finding of increased relative abundance of genes that confer antibiotic resistance in urban samples, despite the fact that in our study antibiotic use in the past 6 months was not significantly different between urban and rural subjects, and no study participant had used antibiotics in the last 3 months. Our results suggest that changes associated with urbanization may indirectly increase the reservoir of resistant genes and virulence factors via increased colonization by pathogenic Escherichia and Shigella. Virulence factors encoded by Escherichia have previously been associated with diseases such as colorectal cancer [36] and Crohn’s disease [28]. Thus, the complex interplay between disease, urbanization, and the microbiome is an important topic for future studies.

In terms of composition, taxa that were more abundant in rural samples were also much less prevalent in the American cohort studied in the HMP. A natural hypothesis is that these taxa—higher in rural China but of lower prevalence in America and poorly represented in finished genome sequencing projects—represent a beneficial set of microbes that are suppressed but not eliminated by urbanization. Our study therefore suggests the possibility that Westernization of the microbiome drives disease by increasing the prevalence of pathogens, such as Escherichia/Shigella, that harbor harmful characteristics, such as antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, and by reducing the relative abundance of beneficial taxa. Our compositional findings suggest that since these taxa are higher in our rural cohort and are not entirely absent in Western populations, changes in lifestyle could presumably allow them to again become more prevalent, potentially increasing host health. Likewise, our study suggests these taxa as potential targets of probiotics. For example, several Ruminococcus species were significantly more abundant in rural samples, and the most significant OTU from 16S rRNA sequencing also belonged to this genus. This genus has been associated with diet and the breakdown of resistant starch and also produces butyrate, which has previously been shown to play an important role in immune function [3739]. Establishing the validity of the hypothesis that the partial Westernization of the microbiome helps to drive disease will ultimately require long-term longitudinal surveys. Executing these studies is particularly vital as these rural populations begin to urbanize or migrate and disappear.

Conclusions

We compared the gut microbiome and plasma metabolome of rural and urban people from a single Chinese province and found significant differences in the composition of recently urbanized and rural subjects. These changes include an alteration in the relative abundances of entire domains, particularly loss of Archaea and Viruses with urbanization. Furthermore, our analysis of the composition of the microbiome suggests that the microbes that had a higher relative abundance in the urban Chinese samples also had a higher relative abundance in an American cohort. In addition, the genes encoded by the microbiome and the metabolites generated have significantly altered with urbanization, with an increase in overall genetic diversity as well as in genes associated with resistance and virulence. Our results suggest that urbanization is rapidly altering the gut microbial community, making it more similar to a Western composition, resulting in higher levels of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. These changes are accompanied by an increase in biomarkers of diseases traditionally associated with Westernization, such as diabetes, obesity, and cancer. Taken together, our study suggests a hypothesis that urbanization/Westernization results in rapid convergent evolution across the globe of the microbial community to a dysbiotic state, with an increase in the prevalence of pathogens that harbor harmful genes and a concomitant reduction in the relative abundance of beneficial taxa.

Methods

A random sample of individuals from Hunan Province (in Southern China) aged 18–65 were selected for the study, with exclusion of individuals who lived in these communities for less than 2 years, were pregnant or lactating, had known cancer, worked in an occupation with potential exposure to arsenic, or had antibiotic use within the past 3 months. Metadata, fasting blood, spot urine, and fecal samples were collected by China CDC data collectors during a three-day house visit, with a repeat fecal collection 2 weeks later. Metabolites were assayed using Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Metabolon, Inc.). Sequencing was performed by the Beijing Genomics Institute-Shenzhen, using an Illumina MiSeq PE250 for 16S sequencing targeting the V4 hypervariable region (16S rRNA sequencing) or an Illumina HiSeq 4000 (whole metagenome sequencing). 16S rRNA sequencing reads were classified using the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) classifier [40]. Kraken [41] was used to assign taxonomy to the whole genome sequencing reads while HUMAnN [42] was used to assign KEGG functions. In addition, whole genome sequencing reads were aligned to the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) protein homolog database, version 1.0.4 [31] or to MvirDB [32] to assess the presence of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. All sequences have been deposited in NCBI SRA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under BioProject PRJNA349463. Accession numbers are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. P values for urban-rural status were calculated using mixed linear models. Nonparametric models were used to confirm these results (Additional file 23: Table S9). See Additional file 22: Supplemental Text for more details.

Abbreviations

AUC: 

Area under the curve

bp: 

Base pair

CARD: 

Comprehensive antibiotic resistance database

HMP: 

Human Microbiome Project

MDS: 

Multidimensional scaling

OTU: 

Operational taxonomic unit

PCoA: 

Principal coordinates analysis

ROC: 

Receiver operating characteristic

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Institute of Nutrition and Health, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention, who collected the data and the Hunan research participants. We also are thankful to general support from the Carolina Population Center, funded by NICHD R24 HD050924, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK104371) and a Translational Team Science Award with funding provided by the UNC School of Public Health and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health through Grant Award Number UL1TR001111. Our funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All sequences have been deposited in the NCBI SRA (National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under BioProject PRJNA349463. Accession numbers are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. In addition, the code and tables used to generate the figures and tables are available in the Additional file 24: Supplementary Zip File and at https://github.com/kwinglee/UrbanRuralChina.

Authors’ contributions

KW, AGH, AAF, and PGL contributed to the study design. JL and DJ collected the data. KW, WS, RZG, and AAF analyzed the data. KW wrote the manuscript. AGH, AAF, and PGL helped in writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research was approved under UNC IRB Study #14-0639 for data collection and analysis of microbiome and phenotypic data and under Study #15-0381 for collection and analysis of metabolomic profiling data. Consent was obtained for all participants with consent forms translated by the China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health of China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
(2)
Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(3)
Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
(4)
Bioinformatics Services Division, Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
(5)
Department of Nutrition and Chronic Disease Prevention, Hunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(6)
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina
(7)
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, CGRC

References

  1. Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pillay TD, Gilman RH, Sanchez JF, Poterico JA, Quispe R, Smeeth L, Miranda JJ. Obesity risk in rural, urban and rural-to-urban migrants: prospective results of the PERU MIGRANT study. Int J Obes. 2016;40:181–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhou M, Astell-Burt T, Yin P, Feng X, Page A, Liu Y, Liu J, Li Y, Liu S, Wang L, Wang L, Wang L. Spatiotemporal variation in diabetes mortality in China: multilevel evidence from 2006 and 2012. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:633.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Song HN, Go SI, Lee WS, Kim Y, Choi HJ, Lee US, Kang MH, Lee GW, Kim HG, Kang JH, Kang YS, Lee JH, Jung JM, Hong SC. Population-based regional cancer incidence in Korea: comparison between urban and rural areas. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48:789–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto JM, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490:55–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur JC, Gharaibeh RZ, Muhlbauer M, Perez-Chanona E, Uronis JM, McCafferty J, Fodor AA, Jobin C. Microbial genomic analysis reveals the essential role of inflammation in bacteria-induced colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4724.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1489–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature. 2009;457:480–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH, Webster LM, Holtrop G, Ze X, Brown D, Stares MD, Scott P, Bergerat A, Louis P, McIntosh F, Johnstone AM, Lobley GE, Parkhill J, Flint HJ. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J. 2011;5:220–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, Biddinger SB, Dutton RJ, Turnbaugh PJ. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. O'Keefe SJ, Li JV, Lahti L, Ou J, Carbonero F, Mohammed K, Posma JM, Kinross J, Wahl E, Ruder E, Vipperla K, Naidoo V, Mtshali L, Tims S, Puylaert PG, DeLany J, Krasinskas A, Benefiel AC, Kaseb HO, Newton K, Nicholson JK, de Vos WM, Gaskins HR, Zoetendal EG. Fat, fibre and cancer risk in African Americans and rural Africans. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6342.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu GD, Compher C, Chen EZ, Smith SA, Shah RD, Bittinger K, Chehoud C, Albenberg LG, Nessel L, Gilroy E, Star J, Weljie AM, Flint HJ, Metz DC, Bennett MJ, Li H, Bushman FD, Lewis JD. Comparative metabolomics in vegans and omnivores reveal constraints on diet-dependent gut microbiota metabolite production. Gut. 2016;65:63–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Filippo C, Cavalieri D, Di Paola M, Ramazzotti M, Poullet JB, Massart S, Collini S, Pieraccini G, Lionetti P. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14691–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Warner B, Reeder J, Kuczynski J, Caporaso JG, Lozupone CA, Lauber C, Clemente JC, Knights D, Knight R, Gordon JI. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Tyakht AV, Alexeev DG, Popenko AS, Kostryukova ES, Govorun VM. Rural and urban microbiota: to be or not to be? Gut Microbes. 2014;5:351–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Vatanen T, Kostic AD, d'Hennezel E, Siljander H, Franzosa EA, Yassour M, Kolde R, Vlamakis H, Arthur TD, Hamalainen AM, Peet A, Tillmann V, Uibo R, Mokurov S, Dorshakova N, Ilonen J, Virtanen SM, Szabo SJ, Porter JA, Lahdesmaki H, Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Cullen TW, Knip M, Group DS, Xavier RJ. Variation in microbiome LPS immunogenicity contributes to autoimmunity in humans. Cell. 2016;165:842–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong P, Liang S, Carlton EJ, Jiang Q, Wu J, Wang L, Remais JV. Urbanisation and health in China. Lancet. 2012;379:843–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pillay TD, Gilman RH, Sanchez JF, Poterico JA, Quispe R, Smeeth L, Miranda JJ. Obesity risk in rural, urban and rural-to-urban migrants: prospective results of the PERU MIGRANT study. Int J Obes. 2015;Google Scholar
  18. Human Microbiome Project C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Group NHW, Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, McInnes P, Wang L, Schloss JA, Bonazzi V, JE ME, Wetterstrand KA, Deal C, Baker CC, Di Francesco V, Howcroft TK, Karp RW, Lunsford RD, Wellington CR, Belachew T, Wright M, Giblin C, David H, Mills M, Salomon R, Mullins C, Akolkar B, Begg L, Davis C, Grandison L, Humble M, Khalsa J, Little AR, Peavy H, Pontzer C, Portnoy M, Sayre MH, Starke-Reed P, Zakhari S, Read J, Watson B, Guyer M. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009;19:2317–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W, Pettersson S. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science. 2012;336:1262–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu GD, Compher C, Chen EZ, Smith SA, Shah RD, Bittinger K, Chehoud C, Albenberg LG, Nessel L, Gilroy E, Star J, Weljie AM, Flint HJ, Metz DC, Bennett MJ, Li H, Bushman FD, Lewis JD. Comparative metabolomics in vegans and omnivores reveal constraints on diet-dependent gut microbiota metabolite production. Gut. 2014;65(1):63–72.Google Scholar
  23. Brugere JF, Borrel G, Gaci N, Tottey W, O'Toole PW, Malpuech-Brugere C. Archaebiotics: proposed therapeutic use of archaea to prevent trimethylaminuria and cardiovascular disease. Gut Microbes. 2014;5:5–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lurie-Weinberger MN, Gophna U. Archaea in and on the human Body: health implications and future directions. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004833.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kernbauer E, Ding Y, Cadwell K. An enteric virus can replace the beneficial function of commensal bacteria. Nature. 2014;516:94–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfeiffer JK, Virgin HW. Viral immunity. Transkingdom control of viral infection and immunity in the mammalian intestine. Science. 2016;351Google Scholar
  27. Endo A, Tanizawa Y, Tanaka N, Maeno S, Kumar H, Shiwa Y, Okada S, Yoshikawa H, Dicks L, Nakagawa J, Arita M. Comparative genomics of Fructobacillus spp. and Leuconostoc spp. reveals niche-specific evolution of Fructobacillus spp. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:1117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, Gevers D, Devaney KL, Ward DV, Reyes JA, Shah SA, LeLeiko N, Snapper SB, Bousvaros A, Korzenik J, Sands BE, Xavier RJ, Huttenhower C. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Cross AJ, Moore SC, Boca S, Huang WY, Xiong X, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Sinha R, Sampson JN. A prospective study of serum metabolites and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer. 2014;120:3049–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wishart DS, Jewison T, Guo AC, Wilson M, Knox C, Liu Y, Djoumbou Y, Mandal R, Aziat F, Dong E, Bouatra S, Sinelnikov I, Arndt D, Xia J, Liu P, Yallou F, Bjorndahl T, Perez-Pineiro R, Eisner R, Allen F, Neveu V, Greiner R, Scalbert A. HMDB 3.0—The Human Metabolome Database in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D801–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, Kalan L, King AM, Koteva K, Morar M, Mulvey MR, O'Brien JS, Pawlowski AC, Piddock LJ, Spanogiannopoulos P, Sutherland AD, Tang I, Taylor PL, Thaker M, Wang W, Yan M, Yu T, Wright GD. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3348–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou CE, Smith J, Lam M, Zemla A, Dyer MD, Slezak T. MvirDB—a microbial database of protein toxins, virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes for bio-defence applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D391–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang J, Guo Z, Xue Z, Sun Z, Zhang M, Wang L, Wang G, Wang F, Xu J, Cao H, Xu H, Lv Q, Zhong Z, Chen Y, Qimuge S, Menghe B, Zheng Y, Zhao L, Chen W, Zhang H. A phylo-functional core of gut microbiota in healthy young Chinese cohorts across lifestyles, geography and ethnicities. ISME J. 2015;9:1979–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakayama J, Watanabe K, Jiang J, Matsuda K, Chao SH, Haryono P, La-Ongkham O, Sarwoko MA, Sujaya IN, Zhao L, Chen KT, Chen YP, Chiu HH, Hidaka T, Huang NX, Kiyohara C, Kurakawa T, Sakamoto N, Sonomoto K, Tashiro K, Tsuji H, Chen MJ, Leelavatcharamas V, Liao CC, Nitisinprasert S, Rahayu ES, Ren FZ, Tsai YC, Lee YK. Diversity in gut bacterial community of school-age children in Asia. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8397.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Sonnenburg ED, Smits SA, Tikhonov M, Higginbottom SK, Wingreen NS, Sonnenburg JL. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature. 2016;529:212–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Muhlbauer M, Tomkovich S, Uronis JM, Fan TJ, Campbell BJ, Abujamel T, Dogan B, Rogers AB, Rhodes JM, Stintzi A, Simpson KW, Hansen JJ, Keku TO, Fodor AA, Jobin C. Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota. Science. 2012;338:120–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, de Roos P, Liu H, Cross JR, Pfeffer K, Coffer PJ, Rudensky AY. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GD, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, Quraishi MN, Kinross J, Smidt H, Tuohy KM, Thomas LV, Zoetendal EG, Hart A. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut. 2016;65:330–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang YJ, Li S, Gan RY, Zhou T, Xu DP, Li HB. Impacts of gut bacteria on human health and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:7493–519.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Abubucker S, Segata N, Goll J, Schubert AM, Izard J, Cantarel BL, Rodriguez-Mueller B, Zucker J, Thiagarajan M, Henrissat B, White O, Kelley ST, Methe B, Schloss PD, Gevers D, Mitreva M, Huttenhower C. Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002358.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement