Skip to content

Advertisement

Microbiome

Research
Open Access

Microbiome and metabolome modifying effects of several cardiovascular disease interventions in apo-E−/− mice

  • Paul M. Ryan1, 2,
  • Lis E. E. London1,
  • Trent C. Bjorndahl3,
  • Rupasri Mandal3,
  • Kiera Murphy1,
  • Gerald F. Fitzgerald2, 5,
  • Fergus Shanahan4, 5,
  • R. Paul Ross5, 6,
  • David S. Wishart3, 7, 8,
  • Noel M. Caplice9 and
  • Catherine Stanton1, 5Email author
Microbiome20175:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0246-x

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 20 July 2016

Accepted: 23 February 2017

Published: 13 March 2017

Abstract

Background

There is strong evidence indicating that gut microbiota have the potential to modify, or be modified by the drugs and nutritional interventions that we rely upon. This study aims to characterize the compositional and functional effects of several nutritional, neutraceutical, and pharmaceutical cardiovascular disease interventions on the gut microbiome, through metagenomic and metabolomic approaches. Apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice were fed for 24 weeks either high-fat/cholesterol diet alone (control, HFC) or high-fat/cholesterol in conjunction with one of three dietary interventions, as follows: plant sterol ester (PSE), oat β-glucan (OBG) and bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri APC 2587 (BSH), or the drug atorvastatin (STAT). The gut microbiome composition was then investigated, in addition to the host fecal and serum metabolome.

Results

We observed major shifts in the composition of the gut microbiome of PSE mice, while OBG and BSH mice displayed more modest fluctuations, and STAT showed relatively few alterations. Interestingly, these compositional effects imparted by PSE were coupled with an increase in acetate and reduction in isovalerate (p < 0.05), while OBG promoted n-butyrate synthesis (p < 0.01). In addition, PSE significantly dampened the microbial production of the proatherogenic precursor compound, trimethylamine (p < 0.05), attenuated cholesterol accumulation, and nearly abolished atherogenesis in the model (p < 0.05). However, PSE supplementation produced the heaviest mice with the greatest degree of adiposity (p < 0.05). Finally, PSE, OBG, and STAT all appeared to have considerable impact on the host serum metabolome, including alterations in several acylcarnitines previously associated with a state of metabolic dysfunction (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

We observed functional alterations in microbial and host-derived metabolites, which may have important implications for systemic metabolic health, suggesting that cardiovascular disease interventions may have a significant impact on the microbiome composition and functionality. This study indicates that the gut microbiome-modifying effects of novel therapeutics should be considered, in addition to the direct host effects.

Keywords

Apo-E-deficientAtherosclerosisCardiovascular diseaseMicrobiomeMetabolome

Background

Cardiovascular diseases represent the most fatal maladies of the system-wide metabolic dysfunction observed in millions globally, currently responsible for an estimated ~30% of mortalities each year [1]. Circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are key modifiable markers in atherosclerosis development and, as a result, these have been the targets of the vast majority of nutritional and pharmaceutical cardiovascular disease interventions. Although external factors such as physical exercise and diet play primary roles in cardiovascular disease onset, it has become evident that the trillions of microorganisms indigenous to our gut also contribute [2–4]. These bacteria and other microbes express a diverse array of genes, many of which play important roles in metabolic function and dysfunction. Such communities respond directly to the nutritional and pharmaceutical environment that their host provides them with, and this largely dictates important host metabolic characteristics such as hormonal and inflammatory tones [5, 6]. While some of these effects can have beneficial outcomes for host metabolic health, the promotion of certain species has even been correlated with cardiovascular disease pathogenesis (for review [7]).

However, we are now discovering that these microbes can express enzymes capable of interacting and interfering with the nutritional and pharmaceutical interventions which we consume, ultimately impacting on their bioactivity. There is growing appreciation for the gut microbiome modulating capacity of many functional nutritional ingredients, such as phytosterols [8] and non-digestible polysaccharides [9, 10], yet this still stems from a limited number of studies for many ingredients. On the other hand, a review reportedly identified 30 common drugs which were open to metabolism by bacterial enzymes, through proteolysis, reduction, dehydroxylation, hydrolysis, and other reactions [11]. The authors predicted that the number of drug-microbiota interactions identified would increase rapidly in the coming years. One drug which appears to act at least in part through the microbiota is metformin, a widely used therapeutic for metabolic dysfunction. It was initially noted that the effects of metformin were compromised by the application of certain antibiotics; however, more recent studies have demonstrated an enrichment of Akkermansia muciniphila in the microbiota of metformin-treated animals [12], and the corrective effects of Akkermansia muciniphila in models of metabolic dysfunction have previously been demonstrated by Everard et al. [13]. Statins, as one of the most widely consumed drug families globally, are of considerable interest in this regard.

In addition, several functional food therapeutics have gained high-quality scientific support in recent years. Current meta-analyses demonstrate that oat β-glucan dietary supplementation consistently reduces LDL-C, non-HDL, and apolipoprotein (apo)-B particles in moderately hyperlipidaemic individuals [14, 15]. While the reductions are somewhat modest, oat β-glucan supplementation may represent an effective and safe method for the management of cardiovascular disease risk. Indeed, it is likely that such functional food ingredients act through manipulation of the indigenous microbiome [16]. Another interventional design currently being explored is the direct application of bacteria expressing an enzyme of interest, such as the bile salt hydrolase family [17, 18]. One such organism, which has reached the market following several successful randomized clinical trials, is Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242. The strain has demonstrated the potential to reduce LDL-C, non-LDL-C, and apo-B100 [19], as well as several inflammatory markers associated with atherogenesis [20].

The mechanisms of action of widely used functional foods, and even certain prescribed pharmaceutics, have traditionally often remained partially unclear. It is likely that many of these interventions act indirectly on their intended target by modifying the host gut microbiota, or being modified by the gut microbiota. It may be important to elucidate these microbial interactions in order to personalize patient therapies. In the present study, we used the apo-E−/− murine model which closely mirrors the pathophysiology of human atherosclerosis [21]. Apo-E is essential to the recognition of esterified cholesterol-rich particles and subsequent cholesterol uptake by hepatocytes. Without this cycle, an atherogenic lipid profile will develop and prevail, along with atherosclerotic plaque formation. The ultimate purpose of this study was to characterize the compositional and functional alterations to the microbiome and metabolome following courses of commercially available nutritional and pharmaceutical cardiovascular disease interventions.

Methods

Animals and diets

Four-week-old male ApoEtm1Unc/J mice were acquired from the Jackson Laboratory (JAX, through Charles River Laboratories International), housed under barrier-maintained conditions within the Biological Service Unit, University College Cork. Animals were acclimatized for 2 weeks prior to being randomized into six separate groups (A-E n = 14, F n = 7). The four intervention groups were as follows: (A) a bile salt hydrolase-active probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri APC 2587 (BSH; 109 CFU/day), (B) plant sterol ester (PSE; 3.4% w/w; Raisio), (C) oat β-glucan (OBG; 7% w/w; OatWell), and (D) atorvastatin (STAT; 1 · 5 mg/kg). All intervention groups received a high-fat/cholesterol (HFC; 42% fat, 1.25% cholesterol; Harlan) diet alongside treatment for a 24-week period. In addition, (E) HFC diet control and (F) normal chow control (NC) were run concurrently.

Bacteria and culturing

A rifampicin-resistant derivative of BSH was created and stored in 70% v/v glycerol, at −80 °C. From these stocks, bacteria were routinely cultured anaerobically at 37 °C on de Man Rugosa Sharp (MRS; Difco; 1 · 5% w/w agar) with the addition of 100 μg/ml w/v rifampicin. From these plates, single colonies were inoculated in 5 ml MRS-rifampicin broth and grown overnight under the same conditions. Bacteria were subcultured twice more prior to freeze-drying.

Bacteria were cultured as above until stationary phase and centrifuged (16,900 × g for 15 min, at 4 °C; SLA-3000 rotor, Sorvall RC B5-Plus). The resulting cell pellet was washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (Sigma Aldrich). Cells were then resuspended at ~2 × 1010 CFU/ml in sterile 15% (w/v) trehalose (Sigma Aldrich), and 1 ml aliquots were dispensed into sterile 2 ml lyophilisation vials. The vials were lyophilized on a 24-hour program (freeze temperature −40 °C, additional freeze 1 min, condenser set point −60, vacuum set point 600 mTorr; VirTis AdVantage Wizard 2·0) and stored at 4 °C until use. Bacteria were resuspended in distilled water each day in order to deliver 109 CFU/day to each animal. Gastric transit of the strains was assessed each week by culturing serial dilutions of fresh fecal samples on MRS-rifampicin plates, as described previously.

Biochemical and biometric analysis

At several points during intervention, mice were bled by facial vein puncture. Whole blood was allowed to clot on ice for 30 min prior to centrifugation at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Serum was withdrawn and stored at −80 °C until use. Total serum cholesterol levels were determined in duplicate as per manufacturer’s instructions using the EnzyChrom colorimetric assay (ECCH-100, BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA). Serum HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides (TG) were determined by their respective LabAssay assays (Wako Diagnostics). Fecal and liver lipids were extracted from approximately 50 mg of sample with a 2:1 (v:v) mixture of chloroform:methanol according to the method of Folch et al. [22]. The resulting lipids were dried and resuspended in the appropriate buffer prior to assay. The same kits used for serum lipid analysis were used for analysis of the extracts.

Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) activity was assessed in protein extracts from 50 mg of jejunum tissue using the SensoLyte pNPP Alkaline Phosphatase Assay Kit (AnaSpec, Fremont, CA USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Data are expressed as microgram of pNPP hydrolyzed per minute per milligram of protein.

Following the 24-week intervention, all mice were analyzed in a Minispec mq benchtop NMR spectrometer (Bruker Instruments) for fat and lean body mass. Animals were then culled and tissues collected and weighed.

Atherosclerotic plaque scoring

Atherosclerotic lesions were quantified by en face analysis of the whole aorta. For the en face analysis of the aorta, the aorta were paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixed (4% w/v) the Oil-Red-O-stained aorta were photographed and used for the quantification of atherosclerotic lesions [23]. The total aortic surface area and the lesion area were measured by image analysis (NIH ImageJ; version 1.49), and the ratio of the lesion area to the total area was calculated.

Cecum microbiome

Microbial DNA was extracted from cecal content using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit protocol (Qiagen), adapted to include a bead-beating step. The V3-V4 regions of the 16S gene were amplified using the primer pair 5-TCGT CGGC AGCG TCAG ATGT GTAT AAGA GACA GCCT ACGG GNGG CWGC AG-3 and 5-GTCT CGTG GGCT CGGA GATG TGTA TAAG AGAC AGGA CTAC HVGG GTAT CTAA TCC-3, as per the preparation instructions for Illumina MiSeq. Samples were barcoded using the primer combinations available in the Illumina Nextera kit (Illumina Nextera XT, Illumina Sweden) prior to quantification with the Qubit High Sensitivity DNA kit (Life Technologies), equimolar pooling and high-throughput sequencing on the MiSeq platform.

FLASH (FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies) was applied for the assembly of resulting 300-bp paired-end reads. Additional sequence read processing, which included quality filtering based on a quality score of >25 and removal of mismatched barcodes and sequences below length thresholds, was performed within QIIME (version 1.8.0). USEARCH (version 7, 64-bit) was utilized for denoising, chimera detection, and clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (97% identity). OTU sequences were subsequently aligned using PyNAST (PyNAST: python nearest alignment space termination), after which taxonomy was assigned at 97% similarity against the SILVA SSURef database release 111. Alpha diversity estimates and beta diversity were calculated using QIIME and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots were created in EMPeror (version 0.9.3-dev; Emperor) and used to visualize differences in beta diversity based on UniFrac distances. Finally, the Galaxy tool for determining the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) was used to identify taxa associated with particular interventions [24].

Cecum short-chain fatty acids—GC-MS

Between 50–100 mg of cecal content from each animal were analyzed for SCFA composition as per the method described in Patterson et al. [25]. Briefly, a predetermined quantity of sample was vortexed with 1 ml of HPLC-grade water and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 10 min prior to centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was withdrawn and 3 · 0 mM of the internal standard, 2-ethylbutyric acid (Sigma Aldrich, Wicklow) was added. Samples were passed through a 0 · 22 μm filter and transferred to clean vials. Acetic, propionic, n-butyric, and butyric acids (Sigma Aldrich, Wicklow) were used as standards. Samples were then analyzed on a Varian 3500 GC flame ionization system, fitted with a Nukol-FFAP column (30 × 0 · 32 × 0 · 25 mm; Sigma) under the conditions previously reported. SCFA quantities are expressed as micromolar per gram cecum content.

Fecal metabolome—1H-NMR spectroscopy

Briefly, fecal samples were broken down under liquid nitrogen by pestle and mortar, and ~40 mg of ground feces was weighted and transferred to microcentrifuge tube. The sample was suspended in 500 μl of HPLC-grade water by vortex mixing for 5 min at room temperature, followed by 30-min shaking at 4 °C. The suspension was then centrifuged at 22,400 × g for 30 min, at 4 °C. Supernatant was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube and this was centrifuged again under the same conditions. Potassium buffer and D2O were added to the supernatant and the mixture was transferred to a clean NMR tube and analyzed on a 700 MHz Bruker NMR.

The resulting 1H-NMR spectra were processed and analyzed using BAYESIL [26], a fully-automated NMR spectral profiling program. A reference metabolite library was generated in the Chenomx NMR Suite Professional software package version 7.0 (Chenomx Inc., Edmonton, AB). The fits of a subset of the spectra were then verified by comparison with Chenomx.

Serum metabolome—direct flow injection and LC-MS/MS

The serum collected as described previously was analyzed using the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 Kit (BIOCRATES Life Sciences AG, Austria), as described previously [27]. Following extraction and derivatization, analytes present in the samples were detected and quantified on an ABI 4000 Q-Trap mass spectrometer (MDS Sciex) run in conjunction with a reverse-phase HPLC-column. The analysis revealed levels of a range of specific amino acids, biogenic amines (BA), acylcarnitines (AC), lysophosphotidylcholines (lysoPC), phosphotidylcholines (PC), sphingomyelins (SM), and hexoses.

Statistical analysis

Biochemical and biometric data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA against the HFC, performed in PASW Statistics v18.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). Finally, linear regression was performed in Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA USA). 16S compositional sequencing and metabolomics data were deemed to be non-normal and, as a result, non-parametric analyses were performed. All groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, followed by 2-tailed Mann–Whitney U pairwise comparisons, solely between HFC and each other group.

MetaboAnalyst metabolomics analysis suite [28–30] was utilized for normalization and multivariate analyses of data. PERMANOVA analyses of all groups together and direct comparisons of each treatment group against the HFC were performed using Adonis [Vegan] [31] on Bray-Curtis index of dissimilarity PCoA plot. Metabolomic and microbiome data were Pareto scaled prior to correlation analysis and plotting, while data were also surveyed, and samples which did not have the complete paired microbiome and relevant metabolome datasets were removed prior to Procrustes and coinertia analysis. For all analyses, a p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Biochemical and biometric analysis

Animal body weights stratified the six groups into two significantly separate clusters (p < 0.01); the high-weight cluster which consists of PSE, HFC and BSH, and a low-weight cluster consisting of STAT, OBG, and NC—named in order of descending mean body weight (Fig. 1a). Both OBG (p < 0.01) and STAT (p < 0.05) mice presented with reduced percentage body fat when compared to the HFC (Fig. 1b). Conversely, PSE animals displayed a significant elevation in percentage body fat even when compared to the HFC (p < 0.05; Fig. 1b). PSE mice presented with significantly reduced total cholesterol when compared to the HFC (p < 0.05; Fig. 1c). Intervention with OBG increased HDL-C by ~100% when compared to the HFC (p < 0.01; Fig. 1c), while no effect on LDL-C was observed in any of the groups. Both OBG and STAT intervention significantly reduced liver weights when compared to HFC (p < 0.05; data not shown), while BSH and STAT reduced liver triglyceride levels (p < 0.05; Fig. 1d). Circulating triglyceride levels were found to be reduced only in OBG treated animals (p < 0.05 Fig. 1d).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Effect of cardiovascular disease interventions on adiposity, cholesterol and lipid profile, atherogenesis, and inflammation. a Animal weight gain over the 24-week intervention period. b Percentage fat of animals prior to cull. c Serum total and HDL and LDL cholesterol evolution over 24-week period. d Liver and serum triglyceride levels following intervention. e Aortic plaque as percentage of total area. f Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) activity in jejunum tissue. g Positive correlation between visceral fat mass and IAP activity, with confidence bands displayed by dashed lines. *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), and ***(p < 0.001) represent significant differences when compared against HFC in one-way ANOVA. Plots depict significant differences and plots depict individual replicates with mean and SEM

High-fat feeding significantly increased the expression of IAP in the jejunum of all groups, bar OBG-fed mice, when compared to NC mice (p < 0.05; Fig. 1f). Furthermore, PSE mice were found to express the highest levels of the enzyme, ~35 μg/min/mg proteins, which also reached higher significance (p < 0.01).

Atherosclerotic plaque scoring

Intervention with PSE offered substantial protection against the lipid-driven atherogenesis associated with the apo-E−/− model, reducing total aortic plaque percentage from 15.2% (HFC) to 2.4% (p < 0.001; Fig. 1e). While OBG intervention reduced aortic plaque percentage to 7.4% (p < 0.05), neither of the other two interventions significantly attenuated plaque formation. The NC-fed group acted as a negative control for the function of the model, demonstrating no plaque whatsoever.

Cecum microbiome compositional sequencing

NC animals scored higher than all other groups in each diversity metric, bar Simpson—in which NC was solely significantly higher than BSH (p < 0.05; Additional file 1: Table S1). OBG and HFC displayed similar diversities; while PSE, BSH and STAT animals had further reduced diversities compared to HFC for phylogenetic diversity whole tree and observed species (p < 0.05). Interestingly, there was a significant dissimilarity between groups overall (p < 0.01) and each intervention apart from STAT appeared to shift the microbiome β-diversity to such an extent that they clustered away from that of the HFC microbiome (Fig. 2a). However, PERMANOVA analysis of Bray-Curtis index of dissimilarity revealed that solely PSE clustered away from HFC significantly (p < 0.05), while BSH was approaching significance (p = 0.07). Fig. 2b depicts the taxa most associated with each of the interventions and HFC, as determined by LEfSe.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Effect of cardiovascular disease interventions on the microbiome composition. Unweighted unifrac principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots (a), with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) representation of taxa associated with HFC and each intervention (b)

Phylum-relative abundance analysis revealed a significant increase in OBG (p < 0.01) and decrease in STAT (p < 0.05) Verrucomicrobia levels when compared to HFC (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Proteobacteria were found to be elevated in the PSE animals when compared to HFC (p < 0.01). This increase can be explained at the genus level primarily by a significant increase in Helicobacter (p < 0.01) and Bilophila (p < 0.05; Additional file 1: Figure S3). Finally, Deferribacteres were recorded at 0.9% relative abundance in HFC; while not one NC animal harbored the phylum (p = 0.056), and only one animal of each PSE (p < 0.05), OBG (p = 0.091), BSH (p = 0.075) and STAT (p < 0.05) presented with the taxon.

At family level, a significant reduction in Streptococcaceae was recorded in PSE (p < 0.01), OBG (p < 0.01), BSH (p < 0.05) and NC (p < 0.01). Peptostreptococcaceae (p < 0.05) and Christenellaceae (p < 0.01) relative abundances were reduced significantly in OBG and NC animals (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Desulfovibrionaceae were elevated in BSH animals (p < 0.05), while the PSE group displayed raised Bacteroidaceae (p < 0.01).

Hosted cecum and fecal metabolome

As anticipated, OBG mice displayed a SCFA profile most similar to that of NC, with significantly increased n-butyrate levels compared to HFC (p < 0.05; Fig. 3e). Interestingly, however, PSE proved capable of influencing acetate production most significantly when compared to HFC (p < 0.05; Fig. 3e), while BSH and STAT treatment appeared to have no detectable effect on these bacterial fermentation products.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Effect of cardiovascular disease interventions on the hosted cecal and fecal metabolome. Fecal metabolome OPLS-DA: a PSE (green) vs. HFC (red). b OBG (green) vs. HFC (red). c BSH (red) vs. HFC (green). d STAT (green) vs. HFC (red). e Ceacum short-chain fatty acids (SCFA): Acetate (brown), n-Butyrate (red) and Propionate (green) were quantified in cecal content extracts by GC-MS

Univariate analysis of log-transformed mouse fecal water metabolome data revealed a couple of interesting functional fluctuations, which may have implications for host cardiometabolic health. Intervention with PSE resulted in significantly reduced levels of trimethylamine (TMA) and isovalerate (p < 0.05). Supervised multivariate analysis in the form of partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) was carried out. Solely OBG intervention altered the fecal metabolome to cause clear cluster separation away from HFC in OPLS-DA plots (Fig. 3b). PLS-DA provided lists of metabolites that were found to be of most importance in explaining differences between each intervention and the HFC. PSE PLS-DA shifts were most strongly explained by reduced levels of isovalerate (variable importance in projection [VIP] score = 2.8) and TMA (VIP score = 2.2; Additional file 1: Figure S4A). OBG-treated mice were associated with formate (VIP score = 2.5) and lactate (VIP score = 2.1; Additional file 1: Figure S4B). In addition, BSH intervention was associated with reduced TMA (VIP score = 3.1) and elevated formate (VIP score = 3.0; Additional file 1: Figure S4C), while STAT also appeared to be associated most closely with formate (VIP score = 2.2; Additional file 1: Figure S4D). Finally, when the microbiome compositional PCoA matrix was compared with that of the fecal metabolome for each sample, we found no significant correlation in their grouping dissimilarity (Mantel statistic r = 0.004585; p > 0.05).

Host serum metabolome

Analysis of the host serum lipid and AA metabolome revealed several clear functional shifts in response to the cardiovascular disease interventions, when compared to the HFC. OPLS-DA plots depict clear cluster separation of PSE (Fig. 4a) and OBG (Fig. 4b) away from the HFC. PLS-DA important feature plots identified reduced PC aa C30:2 as a very strong feature of the PSE mouse metabolome (VIP score = 10.6; Additional file 1: Figure S4A). C3-DC(C6-OH) was found to be of most importance in explaining OBG serum metabolome PLS-DA shifts (VIP score = 4.0; Additional file 1: Figure S4B). Finally, while kynurenine was deemed to be the most important feature in both BSH (VIP score = 7.0; Additional file 1: Figure S4C) and STAT (VIP score = 3.9; Additional file 1: Figure S4D), the relationship was negative in the latter. Interestingly, comparison of the microbiome compositional PCoA matrix with that of the fecal metabolome for each sample revealed a significant correlation in group dissimilarity (Mantel statistic r = 0.5013; p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Effect of cardiovascular disease interventions on the host serum metabolome. Serum metabolome OPLS-DA: a PSE (green) vs. HFC (red). b OBG (green) vs. HFC (red). c BSH (red) vs. HFC (green). d STAT (green) vs. HFC (red). Significant differences in e amino acids and biogenic amines, f acylcarnatines, and g phosphotidylcholines in serum from each group, as analyzed by DI and LC-MS/MS. *(p < 0.05) and **(p < 0.01) represent significant differences when compared against HFC in one-way ANOVA. Plots depict individual replicates with mean and SEM

In terms of specific amino acids, it was found that OBG, BSH, and STAT all significantly reduced arginine levels (p < 0.05), while NC increased ornithine (p < 0.05) and BSH trended towards an increase (p = 0.09; Fig. 4e). The biogenic amine creatine was significantly elevated by PSE, OBG, and BSH interventions (p < 0.05; Fig. 4e). No significant alterations to total amino acids, branched-chain amino acids or total biogenic amines were observed for any of the interventions or NC. In terms of AC, STAT appeared to have a relatively profound effect (Fig. 4f), significantly reducing C14:1-OH (i.e., hydroxytetradecenoylcarnitine; p < 0.05), C18 (i.e., octadecanoylcarnitine; p < 0.05), C3 (i.e., propionylcarnitine; p < 0.05), C4 (i.e., butyrylcarnitine; p < 0.01), and C3-DC(C4-OH) (i.e., malonylcarnitine+3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine; p < 0.05). PSE was the only other intervention to impact on AC-metabolism, also reducing C18 significantly (p < 0.05) and trending towards a decrease in C3-DC(C4-OH) (p < 0.09). Finally, solely PSE intervention also demonstrated an impact on lysoPC and PC (Fig. 4g). The sterol intervention significantly increased lysoPC a C26:0 (p < 0.05), lysoPC a C28:1 (p < 0.05), PC aa C26:0 (p < 0.01), and PC aa C34:2 (p < 0.01), while decreasing PC ae C30:1 (p < 0.05) and abolishing PC aa C30:2 levels entirely (p < 0.01).

Discussion

Although for many years the gut microbiome received little or no recognition for its contribution to the efficacy of certain functional food ingredients, we are now beginning to appreciate its true influence [32]. Furthermore, due to the broad metabolic capabilities of this microbial organ, it is likely that gut bacteria could manipulate a portion of the multitude of functional ingredients and drugs which are currently approved by regulatory authorities but lack a well-defined mechanism of action [33]. In this study, we aimed to characterize the effects of several commonly consumed nutritional cardiovascular disease interventions currently available commercially, as well as a widely prescribed statin, on the host and hosted metabolome through targeted and non-targeted metabolomic approaches, while also investigating the effects on the microbiome composition through 16S compositional sequencing.

PSE

PSE-intervened mice displayed perhaps the most interesting physiological phenotype, with reduced cholesterol and aortic plaque, but the highest body weight and adiposity. The near complete eradication of aortic plaque was also coupled with a significant decrease in fecal TMA. Microbiome-derived TMA is known to pass into host circulation and travel to hepatocytes, in which flavin-containing monooxygenase-3 further metabolizes the compound to trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) [2]—a process deemed to be highly correlated with atherogenesis [34, 3]. In addition, we observed several fascinating compositional microbiota fluctuations as a result of the PSE intervention. These animals presented with an elevated Helicobacter relative abundance, which was raised to 4.5%, while the genus was not detected at significant levels in any other group. Although colonization with Helicobacter can often remain harmless, the LPS and other antigens associated with the genus have shown the potential to induce a low-level systemic and vascular inflammatory tone in the host which may exacerbate atherogenesis [35]. Moreover, current infections with Helicobacter pylori have been associated with an altered, atherogenic lipid profile [36]. Increased LPS levels in host circulation characterize the low-level chronic inflammation, termed metabolic endotoxaemia, which is associated with high fat-induced metabolic dysfunction [37]. This scenario is thought to occur through increased intestinal permeability, which allows inflammatory bacterial fragments from the intestinal microbiota, such as LPS, to pass into circulation [5]. Bates et al. [38] demonstrated that LPS exposure triggered an increase in countervailing IAP expression, as the enzyme acts to detoxify the contaminant by dephosphorylation of the highly inflammatory lipid A moiety. All high fat-fed groups in this study, bar OBG, presented with elevated IAP levels when compared to NC-fed mice. This coincides with elevated Proteobacteria-relative abundances and visceral fat mass levels in these groups—effects from which OBG mice appeared to be afforded protection. The present study is possibly the longest run high fat-feeding trial available to report IAP levels in a mouse model, and thus, we propose that animals experiencing the greatest level of chronic endotoxemia may require augmentation of IAP expression to prevent low-level septicemia during high fat consumption.

PSE mice also displayed significantly increased percentage body fat, ~20% compared to ~15% in HFC mice. To date, there has been just one study reporting significant weight gain in apo-E-deficient mice following consumption of a phytosterol extract [39]. Erysipelotrichaceae, a family of bacteria previously associated with high fat consumption in murine models [40] and obesity in human cohorts [41], were found to be elevated in PSE when compared to HFC. Although each of the interventions appeared to stimulate Erysipelotrichaceae levels, PSE demonstrated the greatest propensity for this. This is peculiar, as it contradicts a report of Martínez et al., in which a PSE diet (5% w/w) was found to decrease Erysipelotrichaceae abundance in hamsters [8]. However, PSE animals also presented with elevated cecum acetate production and it seems likely that a member of the Bacteroidaceae family (such as Bacteroides or Parabacteroides [42]) may have been responsible for the significant increase in acetate production in PSE animals. SCFA are key microbial fermentation metabolites which, through activation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR)-41 and 43, can have important implications for host metabolic function [43]. However, the work of Turnbaugh et al. [44] a decade ago highlighted an increased energy harvesting capacity of the obesity-associated microbiota, which was attributed most significantly to acetate production. Taken together, these data may indicate a causative role of the microbiome in the degree of adiposity of PSE-treated animals.

Interestingly, while levels of the genus Roseburia—a group of microbes which express butyryl-coenzyme A, an enzyme involved in the conversion of acetate to butyrate—were increased >250% in the PSE mice compared to HFC, the ratio of acetate:butyrate remained high. Roseburia spp. have also been proven to metabolize linoleic acid into two precursors of the c9, t11-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomer [45], a bacterial metabolite which has shown potential in the attenuation of inflammatory disorders such as cardiovascular disease [46]. Finally, PSE mice were again found to be unique in that they displayed an altered PC and LysoPC profile. This is certainly interesting, as PSE are known to interact with PC, while directly competing with cholesterol in the formation of biliary micelles [47].

OBG

Butyrate levels were found to be elevated in cecal content of OBG-treated mice, suggesting a prebiotic effect. In contrast to acetate, butyrate and propionate have previously been found to protect against diet-induced obesity in a murine model [48], which may explain the body weight and percentage fat displayed by OBG-intervened mice. In addition, this increase in butyrate could also explain the prevention of IAP expression increase observed in all other high fat-fed groups, as the SCFA has been shown to have important implications for tight-junction function in the gut barrier [43, 49]. As anticipated, OBG intervention again appeared to exhibit prebiotic effects on the cecal microbiota through stimulation of Verrucomicrobia population expansion. Akkermansia, the sole identified gut microbiota member genus of the phylum Verrucomicrobia [50], has been shown to have major implications for host metabolic health, including metabolic endotoxaemia [51–53]. While prebiotic-mediated promotion of Akkermansia muciniphila levels has displayed great potential in stimulating gut peptide production [51], thereby improving tight junction function and insulin sensitivity [13], it is also a potent mucin degrader—a process in which sulfate is released as a by-product [54]. The elevated levels of Akkermansia in the OBG-treated animals therefore most likely explain the simultaneous expansion of sulfate-reducing Desulfovibrio populations, as has previously been observed in a healthy adolescent human cohort [55]. Desulfovibrio spp. display a relatively unique and potentially harmful metabolic profile, reducing sulfates to potentially carcinogenic sulfides [56] and catabolizing choline to potentially atherogenic TMA [57]. Interesting in this regard was the fact that OBG-intervened mice demonstrated the highest mean fecal TMA levels; however, this was not significantly higher than HFC animals. Despite this, OBG mice appeared to be protected from the high-fat/cholesterol-induced atherogenesis. Moreover, in the previous mentioned adolescent study, both Akkermansia and Desulfovibrio levels were associated with the healthy control cohort rather than the obese/overweight group [55].

BSH

VSL#3 is a probiotic mix of bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and streptococci cultures which has displayed BSH activity in vivo [58]. While the BSH-active Lactobacillus reuteri investigated in this study was associated with increased Verrucomicrobia levels, when VSL#3 was applied to a murine model of colonic cancer the luminal and mucosal-adherent levels of the phylum were greatly reduced [59]. As with OBG intervention, this increase in Verrucomicrobia was again associated with an increase in Desulfovibrionaceae. However, the expansion of OBG Desulfovibrionaceae levels was solely the result of increased Desulfovibrio, in contrast with BSH animals there was no such effect on the TMA-producing genus—perhaps explaining the lack of increase in proatherogenic metabolites in these animals. In fact, the increase was due to raised levels of taurine-degrading bacterium, Bilophila [60]. High fat consumption has previously been shown to increase levels of the pathobiont Bilophila wadsworthia [61], although the same effect has also been achieved by increasing host tauro-conjugated bile acid levels. This makes it particularly interesting that the genus was increased in the BSH group in the present study, when compared to the control. A recent clinical study investigating the effects of daily consumption of BSH-active Lb. reuteri NCIMB 30242 in a delayed release capsule uncovered a significant and sustained increase in both glyco and tauro-conjugated bile acid levels over a 4-week intervention period in otherwise healthy, hypercholesterolemic subjects [62]. The implications of such a fluctuation to host cardiovascular disease risk are currently unclear; however, it may be important to consider how BSH intervention may affect populations of this potentially inflammatory pathobiont in the human intestinal microbiota.

STAT

Simvastatin is an example of a cardiovascular disease drug which modulates gut microbiota composition [63] and whose efficacy appears to rely on a suitably responsive microbiome [64]. Simvastatin has previously been shown to boost Lactobacillus populations, while in the present study Atorvastatin showed little global effect (Fig. 2a). However, the STAT group was the only intervention group to display an increase in Ruminococcus-relative abundance (of ~50%) when compared to HFC-fed animals. Certain Ruminococcus spp. have been described as key-stone species in the catabolism of resistant starch [65] and mucin [66]; and therefore promote a diverse, saccharolytic microbiota which may have implications for host metabolic health. Despite having only a modest effect on microbiome composition and functionality, STAT appeared to shift the host serum AC composition, reducing the levels of several of these molecules which play central roles in lipid metabolism. In line with this, serum AC concentrations have been positively correlated with obesity and other metabolic dysfunctions [67]. Furthermore, several of the same AC which were reduced by STAT intervention have previously been positively associated with glucose intolerance in prediabetic and type-2 diabetic cohorts [68]. Intriguingly, STAT animal physiology was most similar to that of OBG animals—presenting with reduced liver weight, body weight, and a near significant reduction in percentage body fat—potentially as a direct result of these AC-modifying attributes. Despite all of these metabolism-linked alterations, no attenuation effect on atherogenic plaque development was noted following STAT intervention. This is not surprising given that previous work failed to demonstrate an ability of a Simvastatin-based intervention to prevent plaque development in the same murine model [69].

Conclusions

This study has highlighted the impact of commonly consumed nutritional and pharmaceutical cardiovascular disease interventions on the gut microbiome. In particular, the data show disconnect between weight gain and adiposity versus atherogenic plaque development in PSE-intervened mice, which is intriguing. This observation coincided with reductions of proatherogenic and metabolism-modulating microbial metabolites in fecal water, and the greatest alterations in microbiome composition relative to the HFC. In addition, we demonstrate the impact of these alterations on the host serum metabolome, in the context of cardiometabolic function. Overall, OBG intervention caused the most favorable shifts in microbiome composition and functionality, which may have contributed to the healthy phenotype observed in this group. On balance, it appears that OBG may be the preferred dietary intervention for safe long-term maintenance of cardiovascular and metabolic health, potentiated by the microbiota. As novel therapeutics enter the market, it becomes increasingly important that we consider their effects on our microbial organ and disentangle direct drug actions from drug-microbiome mediated actions.

Abbreviations

AC: 

Acylcarnitines

BSH: 

Bile salt hydrolase

CLA: 

Conjugated linoleic acid

GLP-1: 

Glucagon-like peptide-1

GLP-1R: 

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor

GPCR: 

G-protein-coupled receptor

HDL-C: 

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HFC: 

High-fat/cholesterol control

IAP: 

Intestinal alkaline phosphatase

LDA: 

Linear discriminant analysis

LDL-C: 

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LEfSe: 

Linear discriminant analysis effect size

lysoPC: 

Lysophosphotidylcholines

MRS: 

De Man Rugosa Sharp

NC: 

Normal chow

OBG: 

Oat β-glucan

OPLS-DA: 

Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis

OTU: 

Operational taxonomic units

PC: 

Phosphotidylcholines

PCoA: 

Principal coordinate analysis

PFA: 

Paraformaldehyde

PLS-DA: 

Partial least squares discriminant analysis

PSE: 

Plant sterol ester

PYY: 

Peptide YY

SM: 

Sphingomyelins

STAT: 

Statin

TG: 

Triglycerides

TMA: 

Trimethylamine

TMAO: 

Trimethylamine-N-oxide

VIP: 

Variable importance in projection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Kenneth Martin, Dr. Elaine Patterson, Mr. Calum Walsh, and Ms. Elaine O’ Brien for their technical assistance during the study. Finally, we extend our gratitude to Clinical-Microbiomics (Kogle Allé 5, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark) for their sequencing services and excellent technical assistance.

Funding

Paul M. Ryan is in receipt of a Teagasc Walsh Fellowship. Travel support was awarded to Paul M. Ryan by the Ireland Canada University Foundation (ICUF) Dobbin Scholarship and the Teagasc Walsh Fellow Short-term Overseas Training Scheme for work carried out in The Metabolomics Innovation Centre (TMIC), University of Alberta. This work is supported by The APC Microbiome Institute (under Science Foundation Ireland [SFI] grant number: SFI/12/RC/2273) and by Enterprise Ireland Commercialization Fund (contract reference: CF/2013/3030A/B).

Availability of data and materials

Raw data can be obtained from the Sequence Read Archive, under BioProject accession number PRJNA371720.

Authors’ contributions

RPR, GFF, NMC, FS and CS designed research. PMR, LEEL, and TCB conducted research. DSW provided essential reagents or provided essential materials. PMR, KM, and RM analyzed data. PMR, NMC, and CS wrote the paper. CS and NMC had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

The use and care of animals was carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Ethics Committee, University College Cork, under a license issued by the Department of Health and Children (Cruelty to Animal Act 1876, Directive for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Food Biosciences, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Co. Cork, Ireland
(2)
School of Microbiology, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland
(3)
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
(4)
Department of Medicine, University College Cork, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
(5)
APC Microbiome Institute, Biosciences Institute, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland
(6)
College of Science, Engineering & Food Science, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland
(7)
Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
(8)
National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton, Canada
(9)
Centre for Research in Vascular Biology, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland

References

  1. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases The World Health Organisation; 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Warrier M, Shih DM, Burrows AC, Ferguson D, Gromovsky AD, Brown AL, Marshall S, McDaniel A, Schugar RC, Wang Z, et al. The TMAO-Generating Enzyme Flavin Monooxygenase 3 Is a Central Regulator of Cholesterol Balance. Cell Rep. 2015;10(3):326–338.Google Scholar
  3. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, Britt EB, Fu X, Wu Y, Li L, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):576–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett BJ, de Aguiar Vallim TQ, Wang Z, Shih DM, Meng Y, Gregory J, Allayee H, Lee R, Graham M, Crooke R. Trimethylamine-N-oxide, a metabolite associated with atherosclerosis, exhibits complex genetic and dietary regulation. Cell Metab. 2013;17(1):49–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Cani PD, Bibiloni R, Knauf C, Neyrinck AM, Neyrinck AM, Delzenne NM, Burcelin R. Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(6):1470–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cani PD, Geurts L, Matamoros S, Plovier H, Duparc T. Glucose metabolism: focus on gut microbiota, the endocannabinoid system and beyond. Diabetes Metab. 2014;40(4):246–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ryan PM, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Caplice NM, Stanton C. Functional food addressing heart health: do we have to target the gut microbiota? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18(6):566–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Martinez I, Perdicaro DJ, Brown AW, Hammons S, Carden TJ, Carr TP, Eskridge KM, Walter J. Diet-induced alterations of host cholesterol metabolism are likely to affect the gut microbiota composition in hamsters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(2):516–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(4):289–306.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bach Knudsen KE. Microbial degradation of whole-grain complex carbohydrates and impact on short-chain fatty acids and health. Advanc Nutr. 2015;6(2):206–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sousa T, Paterson R, Moore V, Carlsson A, Abrahamsson B, Basit AW. The gastrointestinal microbiota as a site for the biotransformation of drugs. Int J Pharm. 2008;363(1–2):1–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee H, Ko G. Effect of metformin on metabolic improvement and gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(19):5935–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Everard A, Lazarevic V, Derrien M, Girard M, Muccioli GG, Neyrinck AM, Possemiers S, Van Holle A, François P, de Vos WM. Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):2775–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Whitehead A, Beck EJ, Tosh S, Wolever TM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(6):1413–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ho HV, Sievenpiper JL, Zurbau A, Blanco Mejia S, Jovanovski E, Au-Yeung F, Jenkins AL, Vuksan V. The effect of oat beta-glucan on LDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol and apoB for CVD risk reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(8):1369–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang Y, Ames NP, Tun HM, Tosh SM, Jones PJ, Khafipour E. High molecular weight barley β-glucan alters gut microbiota toward reduced cardiovascular disease risk. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:129.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Joyce SA, Gahan CG. Bile Acid Modifications at the Microbe-Host Interface: Potential for Nutraceutical and Pharmaceutical Interventions in Host Health. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2016;7:313–33.Google Scholar
  18. Joyce SA, MacSharry J, Casey PG, Kinsella M, Murphy EF, Shanahan F, Hill C, Gahan CGM. Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(20):7421–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones ML, Martoni CJ, Prakash S. Cholesterol lowering and inhibition of sterol absorption by Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(11):1234–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones ML, Martoni CJ, Parent M, Prakash S. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a microencapsulated bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242 yoghurt formulation in hypercholesterolaemic adults. Br J Nutr. 2012;107(10):1505–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolovou G, Anagnostopoulou K, Mikhailidis DP, Cokkinos DV. Apolipoprotein E knockout models. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(4):338–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley G. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957;226(1):497–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koga M, Kai H, Yasukawa H, Yamamoto T, Kawai Y, Kato S, Kusaba K, Kai M, Egashira K, Kataoka Y, et al. Inhibition of progression and stabilization of plaques by postnatal interferon-gamma function blocking in ApoE-knockout mice. Circ Res. 2007;101(4):348–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Patterson E, O' Doherty RM, Murphy EF, Wall R, O' Sullivan O, Nilaweera K, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Stanton C. Impact of dietary fatty acids on metabolic activity and host intestinal microbiota composition in C57BL/6 J mice. Brit J Nutr. 2014;111(11):1905–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Buglioni A, Burnett Jr JC. A gut-heart connection in cardiometabolic regulation. Nat Med. 2013;19(5):534–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Walsh BH, Broadhurst DI, Mandal R, Wishart DS, Boylan GB, Kenny LC, Murray DM. The metabolomic profile of umbilical cord blood in neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50520.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernandes J, Wang A, Su W, Rozenbloom SR, Taibi A, Comelli EM, Wolever TM. Age, dietary fiber, breath methane, and fecal short chain fatty acids are interrelated in Archaea-positive humans. J Nutr. 2013;143(8):1269–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jarrell KF, Walters AD, Bochiwal C, Borgia JM, Dickinson T, Chong JP. Major players on the microbial stage: why archaea are important. Microbiology. 2011;157(4):919–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pimentel M, Gunsalus RP, Rao SS, Zhang H. Methanogens in human health and disease. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2012;1(1):28–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, Suggests M.The vegan package. Community Ecol Package. 2007;10.Google Scholar
  32. Laparra JM, Sanz Y. Interactions of gut microbiota with functional food components and nutraceuticals. Pharmacol Res. 2010;61(3):219–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gregori-Puigjane E, Setola V, Hert J, Crews BA, Irwin JJ, Lounkine E, Marnett L, Roth BL, Shoichet BK. Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(28):11178–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang WHW, Wang Z, Levison BS, Koeth RA, Britt EB, Fu X, Wu Y, Hazen SL. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(17):1575–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Oshima T, Ozono R, Yano Y, Oishi Y, Teragawa H, Higashi Y, Yoshizumi M, Kambe M. Association of Helicobacter pylori infection with systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in healthy male subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(8):1219–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoffmeister A, Rothenbacher D, Bode G, Persson K, März W, Nauck MA, Brenner H, Hombach V, Koenig W. Current infection with Helicobacter pylori, but not seropositivity to Chlamydia pneumoniae or cytomegalovirus, is associated with an atherogenic, modified lipid profile. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(3):427–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, Poggi M, Knauf C, Bastelica D, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, Tuohy KM, Chabo C, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56(7):1761–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bates JM, Akerlund J, Mittge E, Guillemin K. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase detoxifies lipopolysaccharide and prevents inflammation in zebrafish in response to the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2(6):371–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Moghadasian MH, McManus BM, Pritchard PH, Frohlich JJ. “Tall Oil”—derived phytosterols reduce atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17(1):119–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Turnbaugh PJ, Backhed F, Fulton L, Gordon JI. Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3(4):213–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang H, DiBaise JK, Zuccolo A, Kudrna D, Braidotti M, Yu Y, Parameswaran P, Crowell MD, Wing R, Rittmann BE. Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(7):2365–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z. A meta-analysis of the microbial diversity observed in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(4):3730–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr. 2009;139(9):1619–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Devillard E, McIntosh FM, Duncan SH, Wallace RJ. Metabolism of linoleic acid by human gut bacteria: different routes for biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(6):2566–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Viladomiu M, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J. Modulation of inflammation and immunity by dietary conjugated linoleic acid. Eur J Pharmacol. 2016;785:87–95. Google Scholar
  47. Aminov RI. Role of archaea in human disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:42.Google Scholar
  48. Lin HV, Frassetto A, Kowalik Jr EJ, Nawrocki AR, Lu MM, Kosinski JR, Hubert JA, Szeto D, Yao X, Forrest G, et al. Butyrate and propionate protect against diet-induced obesity and regulate gut hormones via free fatty acid receptor 3-independent mechanisms. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang H-B, Wang P-Y, Wang X, Wan Y-L, Liu Y-C. Butyrate enhances intestinal epithelial barrier function via up-regulation of tight junction protein Claudin-1 transcription. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(12):3126–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Derrien M, Collado MC, Ben-Amor K, Salminen S, de Vos WM. The mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila is an abundant resident of the human intestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(5):1646–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L, Ouwerkerk JP, Druart C, Bindels LB, Guiot Y, Derrien M, Muccioli GG, Delzenne NM, et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(22):9066–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Lukovac S, Belzer C, Pellis L, Keijser BJ, de Vos WM, Montijn RC, Roeselers G. Differential modulation by Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii of host peripheral lipid metabolism and histone acetylation in mouse gut organoids. mBio. 2014;5(4):e01438–14.Google Scholar
  53. Shin NR, Lee JC, Lee HY, Kim MS, Whon TW, Lee MS, Bae JW. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut. 2014;63(5):727–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(Pt 5):1469–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Karlsson CL, Onnerfalt J, Xu J, Molin G, Ahrne S, Thorngren-Jerneck K. The microbiota of the gut in preschool children with normal and excessive body weight. Obesity. 2012;20(11):2257–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Oliveira TF, Vonrhein C, Matias PM, Venceslau SS, Pereira IAC, Archer M. The crystal structure of Desulfovibrio vulgaris dissimilatory sulfite reductase bound to DsrC provides novel insights into the mechanism of sulfate respiration. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(49):34141–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Craciun S, Balskus EP. Microbial conversion of choline to trimethylamine requires a glycyl radical enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(52):21307–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Degirolamo C, Rainaldi S, Bovenga F, Murzilli S, Moschetta A. Microbiota modification with probiotics induces hepatic bile acid synthesis via downregulation of the Fxr-Fgf15 axis in mice. Cell Rep. 2014;7(1):12–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Arthur JC, Gharaibeh RZ, Uronis JM, Perez-Chanona E, Sha W, Tomkovich S, Mühlbauer M, Fodor AA, Jobin C. VSL# 3 probiotic modifies mucosal microbial composition but does not reduce colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2868.Google Scholar
  60. Laue H, Friedrich M, Ruff J, Cook AM. Dissimilatory sulfite reductase (desulfoviridin) of the taurine-degrading, non-sulfate-reducing bacterium Bilophila wadsworthia RZATAU contains a fused DsrB-DsrD subunit. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(5):1727–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Devkota S, Wang Y, Musch MW, Leone V, Fehlner-Peach H, Nadimpalli A, Antonopoulos DA, Jabri B, Chang EB. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10−/− mice. Nature. 2012;487(7405):104–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Martoni CJ, Labbé A, Ganopolsky JG, Prakash S, Jones ML. Changes in bile acids, FGF-19 and sterol absorption in response to bile salt hydrolase active L. reuteri NCIMB 30242. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(1):57–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Catry E, Pachikian BD, Salazar N, Neyrinck AM, Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Ezetimibe and simvastatin modulate gut microbiota and expression of genes related to cholesterol metabolism. Life Sci. 2015;132:77–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kaddurah-Daouk R, Baillie RA, Zhu H, Zeng Z-B, Wiest MM, Nguyen UT, Wojnoonski K, Watkins SM, Trupp M, Krauss RM. Enteric microbiome metabolites correlate with response to simvastatin treatment. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25482.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Ze X, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon. ISME J. 2012;6(8):1535–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Crost EH, Tailford LE, Le Gall G, Fons M, Henrissat B, Juge N. Utilisation of mucin glycans by the human gut symbiont Ruminococcus gnavus is strain-dependent. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76341.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Mihalik SJ, Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE, Chace DH, Vockley J, Toledo FG, DeLany JP. Increased levels of plasma acylcarnitines in obesity and type 2 diabetes and identification of a marker of glucolipotoxicity. Obesity. 2010;18(9):1695–700.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Mai M, Tönjes A, Kovacs P, Stumvoll M, Fiedler GM, Leichtle AB. Serum levels of acylcarnitines are altered in prediabetic conditions. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82459.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Bea F, Blessing E, Bennett B, Levitz M, Wallace EP, Rosenfeld ME. Simvastatin promotes atherosclerotic plaque stability in apoE-deficient mice independently of lipid lowering. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(11):1832–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us