Open Access

The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk

  • Lindsay M. Kindinger1, 2, 3,
  • Phillip R. Bennett1, 2,
  • Yun S Lee1,
  • Julian R. Marchesi4, 5, 6,
  • Ann Smith5,
  • Stefano Cacciatore1,
  • Elaine Holmes4, 6,
  • Jeremy K. Nicholson4, 6,
  • T. G. Teoh1, 3 and
  • David A. MacIntyre1Email author
Microbiome20175:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9

Received: 26 July 2016

Accepted: 15 December 2016

Published: 19 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in women at risk of preterm birth (n = 161) to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota and cervical length in the second trimester and preterm birth risk and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone on vaginal bacterial communities in women with a short cervix.

Results

Lactobacillus iners dominance at 16 weeks of gestation was significantly associated with both a short cervix <25 mm (n = 15, P < 0.05) and preterm birth <34+0 weeks (n = 18; P < 0.01; 69% PPV). In contrast, Lactobacillus crispatus dominance was highly predictive of term birth (n = 127, 98% PPV). Cervical shortening and preterm birth were not associated with vaginal dysbiosis. A longitudinal characterization of vaginal microbiota (<18, 22, 28, and 34 weeks) was then undertaken in women receiving vaginal progesterone (400 mg/OD, n = 25) versus controls (n = 42). Progesterone did not alter vaginal bacterial community structure nor reduce L. iners-associated preterm birth (<34 weeks).

Conclusions

L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is a risk factor for preterm birth, whereas L. crispatus dominance is protective against preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone does not appear to impact the pregnancy vaginal microbiota. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about “infection risk” associated with the use of a vaginal pessary during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured.

Keywords

Vaginal microbiome Progesterone Lactobacillus Preterm birth Cervical length

Background

Preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation is now the leading cause of death among children under the age of five [1]. An estimated 15 million babies are born preterm each year, and in the USA alone, the annual healthcare costs associated with those babies that survive is in excess of $25 billion [2]. Ascending bacterial infection from the vagina through the cervix into the uterine cavity is considered to be a major cause of spontaneous preterm birth [35]. Maternal host-vaginal microbial interactions throughout pregnancy are likely to play a fundamental role in reproductive health outcomes. Unlike other body sites where high bacterial diversity is considered beneficial to health [6, 7], a healthy vaginal community structure in pregnancy is dominated by only one, or a few, Lactobacillus species [8, 9]. These species provide protection against pathobiont colonization through excretion of lactic acid and production of antimicrobial compounds [10]. Assessment of vaginal microbial community structure can be performed using a variety of next generation sequencing and PCR-based platforms. The resulting data is typically analyzed using multivariate clustering approaches that permit comparison of individual taxa or community compositions [1113]. A commonly used classification scheme involves hierarchical clustering analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data into community state types (CSTs) as first described by Ravel and colleagues [13]. CSTs are typically dominated by one of four Lactobacillus species; Lactobacillus crispatus (CST I), Lactobacillus gasseri (CST II), Lactobacillus iners (CST III), and Lactobacillus jensenii (CST V). CST IV describes microbial communities largely devoid of Lactobacillus species and enriched mainly in anaerobic bacteria (CST IV).

The composition of vaginal CSTs appears to be influenced by endogenous hormones, fluctuating with menses [14], the use of oral contraceptives [15] and onset of menopause [16], and estrogen supplementation in post-menopausal states [17]. In pregnancy, elevated concentrations of circulating estrogen drive glycogen accumulation in the vaginal epithelium, which is broken down by host α-amylase to complex sugar products such as maltotetraose, maltotriose, and maltose providing carbon sources preferentially utilized by Lactobacillus species [18]. This substrate availability leads to increased Lactobacillus species abundance and stability with advancing gestation and a decline in the number of women harboring microbial communities void of lactobacilli, with a dramatic change to reduced Lactobacillus dominance and increased diversity following estrogen withdrawal in the post-partum period [8, 19]. There is an association between Lactobacillus spp. depletion and vaginal dysbiosis and poor pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth [19] and late miscarriage [20], which appears to be patient cohort dependent [9]. Thus, the interplay between hormonal and metabolic signaling at the vaginal mucosa interface may act as a protective mechanism for the immuno-modulated pregnant mother, against exposure to pathogenic bacteria [21]. This may influence not only immediate pregnancy outcomes but also longer immunological health in the neonate such as allergy and asthma [22, 23]. This vaginal dysbiosis is present in between 2 and 27% of the population in pregnancy but does not always appear to be pathogenic [8, 24]. Recent evidence implicates L. iners dominance rather than dysbiosis for preterm birth risk in pregnancy [25]. L. iners is a vaginal commensal that has relatively recently been shown to be associated with dysbiosis [26, 27] and has been suggested as marker of microbial imbalance leading to BV [28].

The cervix serves as both a mechanical and chemical barrier to ascending bacteria [29]. Premature cervical ripening, a prerequisite for the expulsion of the fetus, may be triggered by exposure of the amniotic cavity to pathogenic bacteria ascending from the vagina [30], which drives a pro-inflammatory cytokine response, triggering prostaglandin release, and untimely cervical remodeling, softening, and dilation [31]. Premature cervical ripening is detectable by transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) several weeks prior to the onset of the clinical symptoms of preterm labor. Second trimester transvaginal cervical length measurements are considered a reliable and predictive tool for preterm birth and are frequently used for preterm birth surveillance [32]. Pregnant women with a short cervix, <25 mm before 24 weeks of gestation are considered at highest risk of preterm birth [33]. Early diagnosis of these pregnancies enables timely and targeted intervention by either cervical cerclage or vaginal progesterone therapy [34]. While both prevention strategies display comparable efficacy [35], progesterone supplementation is increasingly used as it negates the surgical risks associated with cerclage insertion such as maternal pyrexia, vaginal infection, bleeding, and subsequent requirement for cesarean section [36, 37] and has not been associated with any adverse neonatal effects [38, 39].

The mechanism of action of vaginal progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth involves its capacity to promote anti-inflammatory and pro-relaxant pathways in the uterus thereby reducing uterine contractility [4043]. Endogenous progesterone is thought to largely exert anti-inflammatory downstream effects via progesterone receptor B-dominant signaling [43] to inhibit nitric oxide, prostaglandin, and cytokine production [41, 42]. This ultimately reduces myometrial contractility thereby inhibiting premature onset of labor [40]. Progesterone also exerts a quiescent effect on the cervix by limiting prostaglandin-induced collagenous remodeling of the cervical fibroblast [4446]. Progesterone supplementation is therefore prescribed primarily for its systemic anti-inflammatory actions to maintain myometrial and cervical quiescence in high-risk pregnancies. In clinical studies, vaginal progesterone has been shown to attenuate the rate of cervical shortening [47, 48], but its efficacy in preterm birth prevention is cervical-length dependent [4851] with most benefit observed in high-risk pregnancies with a short cervix <25 mm [35]. Administration of vaginal progesterone to women with a long cervix has not been shown to improve pregnancy outcome [51]. Studies on the impact of progesterone on the composition of the vagina microbiota are limited. In non-pregnant women, Borgdorff et al. [52] found that both injectable progestin contraception and combined oral contraception (progestin and estrogen) do not significantly alter vaginal microbiota, but may increase the risk of HIV transmission [53]. It is has been hypothesized that this susceptibility relates to a progesterone-induced modulation of the local inflammatory immune response to infection or alternately thinning of the vaginal epithelial barrier [54]. The impact of vaginal progesterone pessaries on the composition of vaginal microbial communities in pregnancies at risk of preterm birth is unknown.

We hypothesized that progesterone supplementation would promote Lactobacillus spp. dominance and stability, given progesterone’s anti-inflammatory properties, and efficacy for preterm birth prevention. We therefore undertook a prospective study in women at high-risk of preterm birth to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota in the second trimester and the risk of preterm birth and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone therapy on the vaginal microbiota in women with a short cervix.

Methods

The study was approved by NHS National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London - City and East (REC 12/LO/2003), and all participants provided written, informed consent at enrolment. A workflow of the study is provided in Additional file 1.

Patient details and sample collection for cross-sectional recruitment

To investigate the association between the vaginal microbiome, cervical length, and preterm birth outcome, a cross-sectional cohort of singleton pregnancies at higher than normal risk of preterm birth (due to a history of previous spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks+0days) were prospectively recruited from the preterm surveillance clinics at two tertiary London maternity units between January 2013 and August 2014. At initial attendance of preterm surveillance clinics at 16 weeks of gestation, cervico-vaginal fluid was sampled from the posterior fornix under direct visualization, using a BBL™ CultureSwab™ MaxV Liquid Amies swab (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Oxford, UK). The vaginal swabs were placed immediately on ice before being transferred and stored at −80 °C within 5 min of collection. A cervical length (CL) measurement was taken by transvaginal scan (TVS) in supine position, with an empty bladder, taking care to avoid undue pressure on the cervix. Metadata collected included gestation age at sampling, subsequent interventions for preterm birth, gestation at birth, BMI, ethnicity, and antibiotics within the week preceding sampling. Participation in this study did not influence subsequent clinical care or dictate preventative interventions (cervical cerclage or vaginal progesterone supplementation) for preterm birth risk. For the duration of the study, both units employed a policy of CL screening every 3 weeks until 25 weeks, with the indication for intervention being a CL <25 mm at TVS measured at ≤23+6 weeks gestation. In this cross-sectional arm of the study, the choice of intervention for a short cervix (cerclage or progesterone) was at the discretion of the attending clinician.

Longitudinal sampling following progesterone intervention

A longitudinal study was undertaken in a new pregnancy cohort to assess the effect of progesterone therapy on pregnancy with a short cervix. Women with a prior preterm birth <37 weeks were prospectively recruited from the same preterm surveillance clinics. At initial screening ≤18 weeks, all women underwent vaginal swab sampling for 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by CL measurement at TVS, as previously described. Based on CL measurement, women were then allocated into one of two groups. Women with a short cervix <25 mm were treated with vaginal progesterone 400 mg OD at night to continue until 34 completed weeks gestation. Women with a CL ≥25 mm were used as controls and did not receive progesterone or cerclage for the remainder of their pregnancy. Both progesterone and control groups were recruited at ≤18 weeks, and vaginal swab samples were collected longitudinally at 22, 28, and 34 weeks of gestation.

Eligibility criteria for participation in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies included women with a singleton pregnancy and a prior spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks+0 days, who had not undergone CL screening or received either progesterone or cerclage intervention prior to recruitment. Exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancy, preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), iatrogenic preterm birth, HIV positive women, and women who had had sexual intercourse or vaginal bleeding in the preceding 48 h. In the longitudinal study, any women receiving cervical cerclage in either the progesterone or control groups were excluded as this may adversely impact on vaginal microbiota [37].

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

DNA extraction from BBL™ CultureSwab™ was performed as previously described [8]. Forward and reverse fusion primers were used to amplify the V1-V3 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA genes. The forward primer was made up of an Illumina i5 adapter (5′-3′) (AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC), 8 bp barcode, primer pad (forward: TATGGTAATT), and the 28F-GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCAG primer [55]. The reverse fusion primer consisted of an (5′-3′) Illumina i7 adapter (CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT), 8 bp barcode, primer pad (reverse: AGTCAGTCAG), and the reverse primer (519R-GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, California). Sequence data was processed and analyzed using the MiSeq SOP Pipeline of the Mothur package [56] with the Silva bacterial database (www.arb-silva.de/) used for sequence alignment. Sequence classification was performed using the RDP database reference sequence files and the Wang method [57] and taxonomy assignments determined using the RDP MultiClassifier script and USEARCH with 16S rRNA gene sequences from the cultured representatives from the RDP database [58] for species level taxonomies. Data was re-sampled and normalized to the lowest read count in Mothur (n = 725) [59].

Statistical analyses

Examination of statistical differences between vaginal microbiota was performed using the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) software package [60]. To classify vaginal bacterial communities into community state types (CSTs), hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) species taxonomy was performed using ward linkage with a clustering density threshold of 0.75. Samples were classified into five CSTs; I (L. crispatus), II (L. gasseri), III (L. iners), IV (mixed bacterial species), and V (L. jensenii) as described by Ravel et al. [13].

Cross-sectional cohort

In the cross-sectional cohort, a total number of species observed and the Shannon index of alpha diversity were calculated and compared across gestation at birth: <34+0 weeks, 34+0 to 36+6 weeks, and ≥37+0 weeks, using a 2-way ANOVA.

Examination of the relationship between vaginal bacterial communities (or CSTs) and cervical length or preterm birth was assessed using a Fisher exact test as to provide an exact, robust P value that is less sensitive to small sample sizes than alternative approaches such as Chi-squared (reference). Fisher’s exact test was also used to examine individual CST assignments (in 5 × 2 contingency tables for cervical length and requirement for future interventions and 3 × 25 contingency tables for birth gestation and ethnicity). Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test was used to compare pregnancy survival (duration of gestation) for CST I compared to CST III [61].

A logistic mixed-effects regression analysis incorporating gestational age at sample, maternal age, and BMI as fixed effects and ethnicity as a random effect was performed to assess the relationship between pregnancy outcome (birth <34 and >34 weeks) and CSTs as well as individual species abundance. Analyses were performed in R using ANOVA and the “glm” (generalized linear model) R function to analyze the table of deviance for CSTs and for individual species (present in >5% of samples). Species abundances were log-transformed, adjusted for confounders, and false discovery rate adjustment (Benjamini-Hochberg) was applied to correct P values for each analysis [62].

Accuracy parameters, sensitivity (sens), specificity (spec), positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated for the prediction of preterm birth <34+0 weeks according to CST classification at 16-week sampling.

Longitudinal cohort

A linear mixed-effects model incorporating gestational age, maternal age, BMI, ethnicity (Asian, Black, or Caucasian), and cohort (progesterone with short cervix versus control with normal cervix) as fixed-effects and the anonymized patient ID as uncorrelated random-effect was used to assess the impact of progesterone intervention on CST distribution and relative abundance in species present in >5% of all samples. The contributions of fixed-effects terms (P value and F statistics) were calculated using ANOVA with Satterthwaite approximation for degrees of freedom. For each fixed-effects term, a false discovery rate adjustment (Benjamin-Hochberg) was applied to correct P values. All data and computational approaches used for this study are provided in additional information (Additional files 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).

Results

Cross-sectional study patient cohort demographics

A total of 161 pregnant women attending prematurity surveillance clinics for their first appointment (mean 16+6 weeks gestation, Table 1) consented to a vaginal swab followed by a transvaginal scan for cervical length measurement. Spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 34 women (21%) (mean 32+6 weeks, SD ± 3+6 weeks, range 24+4–36+6 weeks). Rates of preterm birth <37+0 weeks were higher in Black women (37%, 11/30) than Caucasians (17%, 18/104) and Asians (19%, 5/27; P < 0.05). Subsequent cervical shortening to below 25 mm occurred in 66% (91/161), all of whom went on to receive an intervention (ultrasound indicated cervical cerclage, n = 71 or vaginal progesterone, n = 20).
Table 1

Patient demographics for a cross-section of 161 participants

 

Term birth >37 weeks

Preterm birth <37 weeks

Total

n/N (%)

127/161 (79%)

34/161 (21%)

161/161 (100%)

BMI

 Mean ± SD (range)

24.3 ± 4.4 (18–48)

24.3 ± 4.4 (18.4–35)

24.3 ± 4.4 (18–48)

Ethnicity, n/N (%)

 Caucasian

86/127 (68%)

18/34 (53%)

104/161 (65%)

 Asian

22/127 (17%)

5/34 (15%)

27/161 (17%)

 Black

19/127 (15%)

11/34 (32%)*

30/161 (19%)

Smoker, n/N (%)

8/127 (6%)

3/34 (9%)

11/161 (7%)

Gestation at sample (weeks)

 Mean ± SD (range)

17+0 ± 1.0 (13+1–18+4)

16+4 ± 1.4 (12+1–18+4)

16+6 ± 1.1 (12+1–18+4)

Cervical length (mm)

 Mean ± SD (range)

32.5 ± 1.0 (18–50)

30.6 ± 6.4 (10–40)

32 ± 5.6 (10–50)

Intervention n/N (%)

 No intervention

60/127 (47%)

10/32 (29%)

70/161 (43%)

 Cerclage

51/127 (40%)

20/32 (59%)

71/161 (44%)

 Progesterone

16/127 (13%)

4/32 (12%)

20/161 (12%)

Gestation at delivery, n/N (%)

 Early PTB, <34+0 weeks

na

18/34 (53%)

18/161 (11%)

 Late PTB, 34+0 to <37+0 weeks

na

16/34 (47%)

16/161 (10%)

 Term, ≥37+0 weeks

127/127 (100%)

na

127/161 (79%)

PTB preterm birth, na not applicable

*P < 0.05 Fisher’s exact term vs. preterm birth groups

The vaginal microbiome at 16 weeks in high-risk pregnancy

Using hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) of normalized genera taxonomy read counts, vaginal swab samples were classified into three categories; normal (>90% Lactobacillus spp., 147/161, 91%), intermediate (50–90% Lactobacillus spp., 5/161, 3%), and dysbiotic (<10% Lactobacillus spp., 9/161, 6%; Additional file 7A). No relationship was observed between genera level structure and subsequent gestational age at delivery. Dominance of Lactobacillus species occurred in equal proportions of patients experiencing preterm <37 weeks (31/34; 91%) or term birth (116/127; 91%). Of those women delivering preterm, 3/34 (9%) harbored a dysbiotic or intermediate microbiome at 16 weeks compared to 6/127 (5%) who delivered at term. Consistent with these findings, measurements of species richness (total number of species observed; Additional file 7B) and alpha diversity (Shannon index; Additional file 7C) at 16 weeks were comparable between women experiencing term (≥37+0 weeks, n = 127), late preterm (34+0–36+6 weeks, n = 16), and early preterm (<34+0 weeks, n = 18) delivery.

Hierarchical clustering of species data permitted classification of samples into community state types (CSTs): I (L. crispatus), II (L. gasseri), III (L. iners), IV (diverse species), and V (L. jensenii) (Fig. 1a). The most prevalent CST observed in the patient cohort was CST I (L. crispatus, 40%), followed by CST III, (L. iners, 34%), CST II (L. gasseri, 10%); CST V (L. jensenii, 9%), and CST IV (diverse, 6%; Table 2). L. crispatus (CST I) was most abundant among Caucasian women (P = 0.008), while Black women had greater numbers of CST III (L. iners; P = 0.049 and CST IV (P = 0.033) (Fisher’s exact, Table 2). Short CL <25 mm was significantly associated with L. iners (CST III) dominance (9/15, 60%) compared to those women with a CL >25 mm (45/101, 31%; P = 0.04; Fisher’s exact, Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

L. iners dominance is associated with a short cervix and preterm birth risk while L. crispatus is protective. a Heatmap of vaginal species data correlated community state types of samples (n = 161) with ethnicity, cervical length <25 mm, subsequent cerclage or progesterone intervention, and gestation at birth. b A short cervix <25 mm at 16 weeks was associated with a higher prevalence of L. iners (9/15, 60%) than longer cervical length (45/146, 31%, P = 0.04, two-tailed Fisher’s exact). c L. iners dominance was associated with early preterm birth <34+0 weeks (12/18, 67%), but not late preterm birth, 34+0 to 36+6 weeks (5/16, 31%) or term birth (37/127, 29%, P = 0.003). A greater proportion of term births had L. crispatus dominance at 16 weeks (63/127, 46%) than both late preterm (5/16, 31%) and early preterm births <34+0 weeks (2/18, 11%; P = 0.009; Fisher’s exact). d A Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated that L. iners (n = 54) dominance at 16 weeks is associated with earlier gestation at delivery than a microbiome dominated by L. crispatus (n = 65, P = 0.02; Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test)

Table 2

Distribution of community state types according to ethnicity and gestation at birth

  

CST, Species

Total population

CST I, L. crispatus

CST II, L. gasseri

CST III, L. iners

CST IV, diverse species

CST V, L. jensenii

n/N (%)

161

(100%)

65/161

(40%)

17/161

(11%)

54/161

(34%)

11/161

(7%)

14/161

(9%)

Ethnicity

 Caucasian

104/161

(65%)

52/104

(50%)*

13/104

(13%)

26/104

(25%)

5/104

(5%)

8/104

(8%)

 Asian

27/161

(17%)

7/27

(26%)

3/27

(11%)

13/27

(48%)*

1/27

(4%)

3/27

(11%)

 Black

30/161

(19%)

6/30

(20%)

1/30

(3%)

15/30

(50%)*

5/30

(17%)*

3/30

(10%)

Gestation at birth

 <34 weeks

18/161

(11%)

2/18

(11%)**

1/18

(6%)

12/18

(67%)**

1/18

(6%)

2/18

(11%)

 34–37 weeks

16/161

(10%)

5/16

(31%)

2/16

(13%)

5/16

(31%)

2/16

(13%)

2/16

(13%)

 >37 weeks

127/161

(79%)

58/127

(46%)

14/127

(11%)

37/127

(29%)

8/127

(6%)

10/127

(8%)

CST community state type based on ward HCA of species data

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; for comparison of birth <34 vs. >34 weeks, two-tailed Fisher’s exact

The association of the vaginal microbiome at 16 weeks of gestation and risk of preterm birth

Major differences were detected in vaginal microbial communities at 16 weeks in women subsequently delivering early preterm (<34+0 weeks) compared those delivering late preterm (34+0 to 36+6 weeks) or at term (>37+0 weeks) (Fig. 1b, Table 2). Specifically, an L. iners-dominated microbiome was significantly over-represented in women delivering <34+0 weeks (67%) compared to late preterm (31%) and term (29%; P = 0.003, Fisher’s exact). In contrast, L. crispatus dominance associated with subsequent term birth (46 vs. 11% early preterm birth; P = 0.009, Fisher’s exact, Fig. 1c, Table 2), and comparatively longer duration of pregnancy than L. iners Fig. 1d. A logistic regression mixed-effects model demonstrated that the association between gestation at birth and CST at 16 weeks persisted after accounting for ethnicity, maternal age, BMI, and gestation at sampling (P = 0.04; ANOVA; Additional file 8). When individual species were assessed by mixed-effects modeling following correction for potential confounders, both L. crispatus and L. iners were significantly correlated with birth outcome with L. crispatus positively associated with delivery >34 weeks (P = 0.009, q = 0.048) and L. iners positively associated with delivery <34 weeks (P = 0.001, q = 0.006; Additional file 9).

The analysis of outcomes stratified by ethnicity did not identify a significant difference between groups although this may be due to relatively small sample sizes. The majority of women delivering >34 weeks with L. crispatus dominance (CST I) were Caucasian (Caucasian 50/95, 53%, Asian 7/23, 30%, and Black women 6/25, 24%), but this was not significant. In those women delivering <34 with L. iners dominance (CST III), similar proportions were represented across ethnic groups (Caucasian 6/9, 67%, Asian 3/4, 75%, and Black women 3/5, 60%; Additional file 10).

Calculation of predictive accuracies for preterm birth using CST assignments at 16 weeks provided sensitivity and specificity values comparable to screening using cervical length [32]: L. iners dominance predicted preterm birth <34+0 weeks with 67% sensitivity and 71% specificity (Table 3). While its absence provided a 94% negative predictive value (NPV), the PPV of L. iners dominance for preterm birth <34 weeks was 22%. High relative L. crispatus abundance was strongly predictive of birth >34 weeks gestation (89% specificity and 97% PPV; Table 3).
Table 3

Predictive accuracies of microbial species dominance at 16 weeks for gestation <34 weeks

CST

Species

Preterm birth <34 weeks

Birth >34 weeks

Sens/DR (%)

Spec (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

Sens/DR (%)

Spec (%)

PPV (%)

NPV (%)

I

L. crispatus

11

56

3

83

44

89

97

17

II

L. gasseri

6

89

6

88

11

94

94

12

III

L. iners

67

71

22

94

29

33

78

6

IV

Diverse

6

93

9

89

7

94

91

11

V

L. jensenii

11

92

14

89

8

89

86

11

CST community state type based on ward HCA of species data, Sens/DR sensitivity or detection rate, Spec specificity, PPV/NPV positive/negative predictive values

Effect of progesterone intervention on vaginal microbial communities in high-risk pregnancy

Given the significant association between vaginal microbial composition at 16 weeks and cervical length and/or subsequent preterm birth <34+0 weeks, we next conducted a longitudinal study of the vaginal microbiome in women receiving vaginal progesterone supplementation for a short cervix (<25 mm). A total of 67 pregnant women were eligible and consented to recruitment, of which 25 were found to have a short CL <25 mm and received progesterone until 34 weeks of gestation. The remaining 42 women did not experience cervical shortening or receive any subsequent preventative intervention, and hence were used as controls. Demographics of the two groups were comparable although, as per study design, the mean CL at commencement of progesterone was significantly lower in the “short CL” than the “normal” control group (22 vs. 32 mm, P < 0.05) at comparable screening gestations (15+5 vs. 15+0, respectively; Table 4). Respective rates of preterm birth (<37 weeks) were higher in the progesterone (32%, 8/25) versus control groups (5%, 2/42; P = 0.004). A total of 234 high vaginal samples were collected from longitudinal follow-up (22, 28, and 34 weeks) at matched gestational ages among groups (Additional file 11).
Table 4

Participant demographics for control and progesterone groups

 

High risk controls

Progesterone

Total

n/N (%)

42/67 (63%)

25/67(37%)

67/67 (100%)

Age, years

 Mean ± SD (range)

32 ± 5.5 (21–40)

32 ± 3.9 (22–38)

32 ± 5.0 (21–40)

BMI

 Mean ± SD (range)

24.7 ± 5.3 (19–48)

25.2 ± 4.7 (18.4–35)

24.9 ± 5.0 (18.4–48)

Ethnicity, n/N (%)

 Caucasian

32/42 (76%)

18/25 (72%)

50/67 (75%)

 Asian

4/42 (10%)

3/25 (12%)

7/67 (10%)

 Black

6/42 (14%)

4/25 (16%)

10/67 (15%)

Smoker n/N (%)

2/42 (5%)

0/25 (0%)

2/67 (3%)

Screening for progesterone

   

 GA (weeks), median, range

15+0 (12+1–18+2)

15+6 (12+0–18+6)

15+3 (12+0–18+6)

 CL (mm), median, range

32 (26–43)

22 (13–25)

(13–43)

Gestation at delivery, n/N (%)

 Early PTB, <34+0 weeks

1/42 (2%)

4/25 (16%)

5/67 (7%)

 Late PTB, 34+0 to <37+0 weeks

1/42 (2%)

4/25 (16%)

5/67 (7%)

 Term, ≥37+0 weeks

40/42 (95%)

17/25 (68%)

57/67 (85%)

PTB preterm birth, GA gestational age, CL cervical length (mm)

The distribution of CSTs in the progesterone and control groups at each sampling time point is provided in Additional file 12. Prior to progesterone intervention, no significant difference in the distribution of CSTs between to the two patient cohorts was observed (Fig. 2; Additional file 12). Vaginal progesterone supplementation had no effect upon vaginal bacterial community state structure throughout pregnancy (Fig. 2a) nor were species richness or alpha diversity measurements altered (Fig. 2b, c). Progesterone supplementation did not significantly impact on mean relative abundance of L. iners or L. crispatus with advancing gestation when compared to controls (Fig. 2d, c; Additional file 13).
Fig. 2

Vaginal progesterone treatment does not alter structure of the vaginal microbiome. a Compared to controls (n = 42), progesterone supplementation (n = 25) had no significant impact upon microbial community profiles with advancing gestation. Similarly, no effect of progesterone treatment upon b the number of species observed or c the corresponding Shannon index of alpha diversity was observed (2-way ANOVA). Fewer women requiring progesterone had a L. crispatus dominated microbiome compared to controls (8/25, 32 vs. 18/42, 43%, P = 0.4); however, progesterone treatment was associated with increased relative L. crispatus abundance with advancing gestation. Advancing gestational age from 18 to 34 weeks was not associated with a significant shift in mean relative abundance of L. iners (d) or L. crispatus (e) in either the controls or progesterone groups (Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s multiple comparison)

The dynamics of individual vaginal CSTs during pregnancy were then longitudinally assessed in both progesterone and control cohorts (Fig. 3). Regardless of intervention, a L. crispatus (CST I)-dominated microbiome was associated with high stability throughout pregnancy with 92% (24/26) of women maintaining L. crispatus dominance across all sampling time points. In contrast, significantly lower stability was observed in the 23 women exhibiting a L. iners-dominated microbiome at the first sampling with 17 (74%) of these women experiencing a shift to an alternative CST at some stage during their pregnancy (P < 0.0001). Similar levels of CST-shifting were observed in those women receiving vaginal supplementation (9/25; 36%) and control patients (10/43; 23%) (P = 0.3).
Fig. 3

Longitudinal profiling of community state types for progesterone (n = 25) and control groups (n = 42). Progesterone supplementation was commenced after the first sampling time point (<18 weeks). Each longitudinal sample was assigned to a CST (Fig. 1a) as indicated by the color-coded rectangle and categorized as a function of delivery gestation

When gestational age at sampling, maternal age, BMI, ethnicity, and cohort were incorporated into a linear mixed-effects model, progesterone treatment did not have a significant impact upon CSTs apart from CST II; however, this difference did not withstand multiple testing correction (Additional file 14). When further assessed by relative abundance of individual species, there were no significant differences in proportions of L. gasseri, or any other species in the control compared to progesterone cohorts (Additional file 15).

In women receiving progesterone, marked differences in the longitudinal CST distributions were observed in women delivering <34 weeks compared to those delivering >34 weeks (Fig. 4). At 18 weeks of gestation, L. iners dominance was observed in 100% (4/4) of women who subsequently delivered <34 weeks of gestation compared to 24% (5/21) in women delivering >34 weeks. At delivery, L. iners dominance was observed in 50% (2/4) at 22 weeks and 100% (4/4) at 28 weeks (Figs. 3 and 4).
Fig. 4

Preterm birth, despite vaginal progesterone, is associated with L. iners dominance throughout pregnancy. Longitudinal sampling of 25 women receiving progesterone for a short cervix showed L. iners dominance was associated with all women who subsequently delivered preterm <34+0 weeks (n = 4; (**P < 0.05; Fisher’s exact). Single asterisk indicates the delivery samples collected within 2 weeks of delivery between 28 and 34 weeks

Discussion

This study represents the largest next generation sequencing-based analysis of vaginal microbiota in pregnancies at risk of preterm birth to date. We demonstrate a significant association between L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiome at 16 weeks of gestation with subsequent preterm birth and conversely show that L. crispatus dominance correlates with reduced risk or preterm birth. Moreover, we show that the insertion of a progesterone pessary for prevention of preterm birth has no adverse impact on vaginal microbial communities.

A healthy vaginal microbiome in non-gravid and gravid subjects is often described as being synonymous with low bacterial diversity and Lactobacillus species dominance [6366]. Examination of vaginal microbiota at the time of delivery using culture and/or microscopy-based techniques has shown that Lactobacillus species dominance is negatively associated with delivery before 37 weeks of gestation (odds ratio 0.2) whereas bacterial dysbiosis is positively associated with preterm delivery (odds ratio 2.3) [66]. Using similar methodology, Donders and colleagues recently reported that a lactobacilli-dominated vaginal microbiome in the first trimester was associated with a 75% lower risk of delivery before 35 weeks of gestation (0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.56] compared to women harboring a vaginal microbiome void of Lactobacillus species (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2–4.8) [67]. Using culture-independent characterization of vaginal bacterial communities in a high-risk pregnant population, we show that the perceived benefit of lactobacilli dominance in pregnancy is species specific; L. crispatus is advantageous and associated with term delivery whereas L. iners is associated with increased risk of preterm delivery. Furthermore, L. iners is associated more specifically with a risk of early (<34 weeks) rather than late (34–37 weeks) preterm birth. High relative abundance of L. crispatus is highly specific for term birth, with a false positive rate (1 specificity) of just 3% in our population of women at high risk because of a previous preterm birth. In this population, second trimester dominance of L. iners carries a 67% detection rate (i.e., sensitivity) for preterm birth before 34 weeks; a screening sensitivity comparable to cervical length, the current and primary screening tool used for preterm birth surveillance [32, 68]. Consistent with our findings, Petricevic and colleagues recently reported an over-representation of L. iners dominance in vaginal swab samples collected from 13 preterm births derived from a low-risk cohort of 111 pregnancies, and none of whom delivered before 33 weeks of gestation [25]. However, this study was limited by the use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for the characterization of only major Lactobacillus species and could not identify other pathobionts in the samples.

While our study reveals a clear relationship between relative abundance of vaginal Lactobacillus species and risk of subsequent preterm birth, our data indicate that Lactobacillus spp. depletion or vaginal dysbiosis in the second trimester does not appear to contribute to preterm birth risk. The role of early gestational vaginal dysbiosis in the pathology of preterm birth is controversial. In agreement with our findings, a recent longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microbiome by Romero and colleagues in 18 women experiencing preterm birth (<34 weeks gestation) reported no association between preterm birth and vaginal microbial dysbiosis when compared to controls experiencing term delivery (n = 72) [24]. However, in their study, 95% (17/18) of preterm birth samples and 86% of control samples were collected from African American women who exhibit a higher pregnant and non-pregnant background prevalence of vaginal dysbiosis (CST IV) [13, 24]. In contrast to these findings, Digiulio and co-workers [19] reported, in a small yet densely sampled cohort of women experiencing preterm birth (n = 15), which vaginal bacterial diversity does correlate with risk of preterm delivery [19]. The clinical relevance of these findings however are difficult to establish considering the small sample size and the heterogeneous nature of the cohort; only five women delivered preterm spontaneously and almost half delivered within 1 week of term dates (>36 weeks+3/7 days).

Our presented data provide some suggestion that vaginal microbiota in Black women may not play as an important contributory role to preterm birth pathogenesis as Caucasians and Asians. We did not however have sufficient power to demonstrate the significance of this, but this may be worth examining in future studies.

In our study, we also observed a high rate of CST-shifting in women with an L. iners-dominated microbiome in the second trimester compared to women with an L. crispatus-dominated microbiome. L. iners has been reported as an intermediary between lactobacilli dominance and CST IV-associated states and is the predominant microbiome in peri-menopausal women as they transition through to postmenopausal dominance of anaerobic bacteria [16]. Interactions between L. iners and the maternal host likely provides a vaginal mucosal environment permissible to colonization by BV-associated pathogens, a setting in which it tolerates co-existence well [69, 70]. Unlike other Lactobacillus species, L. iners also induces secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines when human vaginal epithelial cells are observed in vitro, whereas L. crispatus does not [71, 72].

Other evidence for a role of bacterial dysbiosis in the pathology of preterm birth includes the long recognized association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) and increased risk of preterm birth; however, evidence suggests that screening and treating BV in pregnancy reduces preterm delivery in certain cohorts [73], but not in others [74]. We propose an alternate concept, which is that it is the presence of L. iners that promotes risk of early preterm birth, but because an L. iners-dominated vaginal microbiome has less stability, there is a tendency for transition to BV-associated CST-IV [69, 75]. Indeed, L. iners is the prominent vaginal species following antibiotic treatment for BV [76]. Older studies aimed at detecting BV, which could not differentiate Lactobacillus species and concluded that it was BV rather than species of Lactobacillus that conferred the risk.

Recent investigations into the protective role of Lactobacillus species in the context of reproductive health have revealed major species-specific differences in the capacity to prevent pathobiont colonization and viral infections [12, 72, 77, 78] that are driven largely by maternal host-bacterial metabolite interactions at the vaginal mucosal interface. For example, although lactic acid-producing bacteria including Lactobacillus spp. produce both the d- and l-lactic acid isomers [79], the chirality of the isomer has major functional implications. In women exhibiting a vaginal microbiome dominated by L. iners, an increased ratio of l to d-lactic acid has previously been shown to promote expression of vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) and the activation of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP8), which may subsequently modulate cervical integrity [80]. Conversely, no such relationship has been observed in women with vaginal microbial communities dominated by L. crispatus, which instead preferentially excretes high levels of d-lactic acid and greater overall levels of lactic acid than L. iners [80]. Apart from modulating local tissue inflammation, recent studies have also implicated lactate isomers in vaginal mucosal trapping mechanisms. High concentrations of d-lactic acid are associated with L. crispatus dominance and enhanced trapping of HIV-1 virions in cervico-vaginal mucosa whereas low concentrations of d-lactic acid associated with L. iners dominance permits comparatively rapid diffusion of virions through cervico-vaginal mucosa [77]. Collectively, these data suggest mechanisms by which L. iners dominance of vaginal microbial communities during pregnancy may lead to the modulation of local tissue inflammation and remodeling pathways and to disruption of chemical and mechanical mucosal barriers protective against ascending infection and increase the risk of preterm birth. Such mechanisms may account for the observed association between L. iners dominance and a short cervical length (<25 mm) seen in our study at 16 weeks of gestation, which itself is highly specific for preterm birth [81].

Considering the potential pro-inflammatory roles played by L. iners in the vagina during pregnancy, we postulated that any associated poor pregnancy outcomes might be attenuated by the anti-inflammatory actions of progesterone [45, 82]. However, in this study, no effect of vaginal progesterone therapy upon the frequency of vaginal community state structure was observed across pregnancy indicating that the mode of action of progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth is not through modulation of the vaginal microbiome. The data also show, however, that there is no detrimental effect upon the vaginal microbiome of either progesterone itself or of the daily vaginal insertion of a pessary.

A particular strength of our study is that we characterized the vaginal microbiome in a comparatively large patient cohort at high risk of preterm birth. This strength was demonstrated by a high spontaneous preterm birth rate (n = 34/161). The mean gestation at birth of 32+6 weeks within our preterm birth cohort, and a distribution of gestational ages ranging from 24 to 36 weeks, enabled the characterization of microbial profiles associated with both early (<34 weeks) and late (34 > 37 weeks) preterm birth, providing a broader observational base for microbial-host interactions in pregnancy. The primary limitation was the small number of women receiving progesterone (n = 25) and the lack of an equivalent control group with a short CL <25 mm not receiving any intervention or receiving a placebo. A short CL significantly increases subsequent preterm birth risk [33]; therefore, once detected, clinicians are ethically obliged to provide a preventative intervention such as progesterone. Consequently, a “placebo” intervention for a short cervix could not be included for study in this clinical study. As such, the control women are not true controls as their cervical lengths were all greater than 25 mm at entry. A further potential confounding factor was the impact of ethnicity of vaginal microbiota and gestation at birth, although we demonstrated this not to be significant in our cohort.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that specific Lactobacillus species have differing associations with outcome in pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth. Detection of vaginal microbial composition in the early second trimester may be used to stratify preterm birth risk; L. crispatus dominance is highly predictive of term birth, while high L. iners relative abundance is associated with increased risk of preterm birth and warrants heighted surveillance. Increased diversity of vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is not associated with increased risk of preterm birth. The use of progesterone therapy for preterm birth prevention does not appear to adversely affect the relative abundance of vaginal Lactobacillus species or species diversity, indicating that progesterone’s mode of action during pregnancy is likely not via modulation of vaginal microbial communities. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about the “infection risk” associated with the use of vaginal pessaries during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured.

Abbreviations

bp: 

Base pairs

BV: 

Bacterial vaginosis

CI: 

Confidence interval

CL: 

Cervical length

CST: 

Community state type

DDGE: 

Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

EMMPRIN: 

Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer

HCA: 

Hierarchical cluster analysis

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

MMP: 

Metalloproteinase

NHS: 

National Health Service

NPV: 

Negative predictive value

OD: 

Omne in die (once per day)

OR: 

Odds ratio

PPV: 

Positive predictive value

RDP: 

Ribosomal database project

REC: 

Research ethics committee

rRNA: 

Ribosomal ribonucleic acid

SD: 

Standard deviation

STAMP: 

Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles

TVS: 

Transvaginal scan

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants of the study and members of Women’s Health Research Centre, Imperial College Health NHS.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College London (Grant Ref P45272) and by the Genesis Research Trust (Grant Ref P51389). DAM is supported by a Career Development Award from the Medical Research Council (MR/L009226/1).

Availability of data and materials

The sequence datasets and relevant metadata supporting the conclusions of this study can be obtained at the European Nucleotide Archive’s (ENA) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (accession number PRJEB11895 and PRJEB12577). Further details of all statistical analyses performed in this manuscript are provided in Additional file 2. Species-level read count data used for these analyses along with the relevant metadata are provided in Additional files 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Authors’ contributions

LMK, PRB, and DAM conceived and designed the experiments. LMK and YSL collected samples and performed experiments. LMK, JRM, AS, SC, and DAM performed the data analysis and generated the figures and tables. LMK, PRB, and DAM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LMK, PRB, YSL, JRM, AS, SC, EH, JKN, TGT, and DAM critically reviewed the data and the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The views expressed in the submitted article are of the authors and not an official position of the institutions or funders. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by NHS National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee London - City and East (REC 12/LO/2003), and all participants provided written, informed consent at enrolment.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Imperial College Parturition Research Group, Division of the Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London
(2)
Queen Charlotte’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
(4)
Centre for Digestive and Gut Health, Department of Surgery and Cancer and the Institute of Global Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London
(5)
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University
(6)
Division of Computational Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London

References

  1. Causes of child mortality [http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/causes/en/]. Accessed 7 July 2016.
  2. McCormick MC, Litt JS, Smith VC, Zupancic JA. Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:367–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rudan I, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Mathers C, Black RE. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000-13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385(9966):430–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308(5728):1635–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MacIntyre DA, Chandiramani M, Lee YS, Kindinger L, Smith A, Angelopoulos N, Lehne B, Arulkumaran S, Brown R, Teoh TG, et al. The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8988.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Nikita L, Galuppi M, Lamont RF, Chaemsaithong P, Miranda J, et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome. 2014;2(1):4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Reid G, Younes JA, Van der Mei HC, Gloor GB, Knight R, Busscher HJ. Microbiota restoration: natural and supplemented recovery of human microbial communities. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(1):27–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van de Wijgert JH, Jespers V. Incorporating microbiota data into epidemiologic models: examples from vaginal microbiota research. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(5):360–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Borgdorff H, Tsivtsivadze E, Verhelst R, Marzorati M, Jurriaans S, Ndayisaba GF, Schuren FH, van de Wijgert JH. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J. 2014;8(9):1781–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108 Suppl 1:4680–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaban B, Links MG, Jayaprakash TP, Wagner EC, Bourque DK, Lohn Z, Albert AY, van Schalkwyk J, Reid G, Hemmingsen SM, et al. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy Canadian women through the menstrual cycle. Microbiome. 2014;2:23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. van de Wijgert JHHM, Verwijs MC, Turner AN, Morrison CS. Hormonal contraception decreases bacterial vaginosis but oral contraception may increase candidiasis: implications for HIV transmission. Aids. 2013;27(13):2141–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, Fadrosh D, Chang K, Silver MI, Viscidi RP, Burke AE, Ravel J, Gravitt PE. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause. 2014;21(5):450–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Shen J, Song N, Williams CJ, Brown CJ, Yan Z, Xu C, Forney LJ. Effects of low dose estrogen therapy on the vaginal microbiomes of women with atrophic vaginitis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24380.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Spear GT, French AL, Gilbert D, Zariffard MR, Mirmonsef P, Sullivan TH, Spear WW, Landay A, Micci S, Lee BH, et al. Human alpha-amylase present in lower-genital-tract mucosal fluid processes glycogen to support vaginal colonization by Lactobacillus. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(7):1019–28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. DiGiulio DB, Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Costello EK, Lyell DJ, Robaczewska A, Sun CL, Goltsman DS, Wong RJ, Shaw G, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of the human microbiota during pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(35):11060–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Leitich H, Kiss H. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(3):375–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chandiramani M, Bennett PR, Brown R, Lee YS, MacIntyre DA. Vaginal microbiome-pregnant host interactions determine a significant proportion of preterm labour. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2014;25(1):73–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Merrifield CA, Lewis MC, Berger B, Cloarec O, Heinzmann SS, Charton F, Krause L, Levin NS, Duncker S, Mercenier A, et al. Neonatal environment exerts a sustained influence on the development of the intestinal microbiota and metabolic phenotype. ISME J. 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, Knight R. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(26):11971–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Romero R, Hassan SS, Gajer P, Tarca AL, Fadrosh DW, Bieda J, Chaemsaithong P, Miranda J, Chaiworapongsa T, Ravel J. The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women who subsequently have spontaneous preterm labor and delivery and those with a normal delivery at term. Microbiome. 2014;2:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, Sandhofer MJ, Fidesser M, Krondorfer I, Husslein P, Kneifel W, Kiss H. Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5136.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamrakar R, Yamada T, Furuta I, Cho K, Morikawa M, Yamada H, Sakuragi N, Minakami H. Association between Lactobacillus species and bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria, and bacterial vaginosis scores in pregnant Japanese women. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:128.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Srinivasan S, Hoffman NG, Morgan MT, Matsen FA, Fiedler TL, Hall RW, Ross FJ, McCoy CO, Bumgarner R, Marrazzo JM, et al. Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria. PLoS One. 2012;7(6), e37818.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Africa CW, Nel J, Stemmet M. Anaerobes and bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: virulence factors contributing to vaginal colonisation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(7):6979–7000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):69–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Guzeloglu-Kayisli O, Kayisli UA, Semerci N, Basar M, Buchwalder LF, Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Arcuri F, Larsen K, Huang JS, et al. Mechanisms of chorioamnionitis-associated preterm birth: interleukin-1beta inhibits progesterone receptor expression in decidual cells. J Pathol. 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Ekman-Ordeberg G, Dubicke A. Preterm cervical ripening in humans. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2012;4(4):245–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Grimes-Dennis J, Berghella V. Cervical length and prediction of preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(2):191–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Iams JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(19):1861.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Da Fonseca E, Creasy GW, Klein K, Rode L, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):124. e121-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Roberts D, Jorgensen AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4, CD008991.Google Scholar
  37. Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, McDonald JA, Terzidou V, Cook JR, Lees C, Israfil-Bayli F, et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(350):350ra. 102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Resseguie LJ, Hick JF, Bruen JA, Noller KL, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Congenital malformations among offspring exposed in utero to progestins, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1936-1974. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(4):514–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Northen AT, Norman GS, Anderson K, Moseley L, Divito M, Cotroneo M, Swain M, Bousleiman S, Johnson F, Dorman K, et al. Follow-up of children exposed in utero to 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate compared with placebo. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):865–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Anderson L, Martin W, Higgins C, Nelson SM, Norman JE. The effect of progesterone on myometrial contractility, potassium channels, and tocolytic efficacy. Reprod Sci. 2009;16(11):1052–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardy DB, Janowski BA, Corey DR, Mendelson CR. Progesterone receptor plays a major antiinflammatory role in human myometrial cells by antagonism of nuclear factor-kappaB activation of cyclooxygenase 2 expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(11):2724–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Loudon JA, Elliott CL, Hills F, Bennett PR. Progesterone represses interleukin-8 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in human lower segment fibroblast cells and amnion epithelial cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(1):331–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tan H, Yi L, Rote NS, Hurd WW, Mesiano S. Progesterone receptor-A and -B have opposite effects on proinflammatory gene expression in human myometrial cells: implications for progesterone actions in human pregnancy and parturition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(5):E719–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Carbonne B, Dallot E, Haddad B, Ferré F, Cabrol D. Effects of progesterone on prostaglandin E(2)-induced changes in glycosaminoglycan synthesis by human cervical fibroblasts in culture. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6(7):661–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nold C, Maubert M, Anton L, Yellon S, Elovitz MA. Prevention of preterm birth by progestational agents: what are the molecular mechanisms? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(3):223. e221-227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Yellon SM, Dobyns AE, Beck HL, Kurtzman JT, Garfield RE, Kirby MA. Loss of progesterone receptor-mediated actions induce preterm cellular and structural remodeling of the cervix and premature birth. PLoS One. 2013;8(12), e81340.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Facchinetti F, Paganelli S, Comitini G, Dante G, Volpe A. Cervical length changes during preterm cervical ripening: effects of 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):453. e451-454; discussion 421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hassan S, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter J, Khandelwal M, Vijayaraghavan J, Trivedi Y, Soma‐Pillay P, Sambarey P. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):18–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH, Group FMFSTS. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):462–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Brien JM, Adair CD, Lewis DF, Hall DR, Defranco EA, Fusey S, Soma-Pillay P, Porter K, How H, Schackis R, et al. Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):687–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. van Os MA, van der Ven AJ, Kleinrouweler CE, Schuit E, Kazemier BM, Verhoeven CJ, de Miranda E, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, Sikkema JM, Woiski MD, et al. Preventing preterm birth with progesterone in women with a short cervical length from a low-risk population: a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(10):993–1000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Borgdorff H, Verwijs MC, Wit FW, Tsivtsivadze E, Ndayisaba GF, Verhelst R, Schuren FH, van de Wijgert JH. The impact of hormonal contraception and pregnancy on sexually transmitted infections and on cervicovaginal microbiota in african sex workers. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(3):143–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ralph LJ, McCoy SI, Shiu K, Padian NS. Hormonal contraceptive use and women’s risk of HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(2):181–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Blish CA, Baeten JM. Hormonal contraception and HIV-1 transmission. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65(3):302–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sundquist A, Bigdeli S, Jalili R, Druzin ML, Waller S, Pullen KM, El-Sayed YY, Taslimi MM, Batzoglou S, Ronaghi M. Bacterial flora-typing with targeted, chip-based pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(17):5112–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Parks DH, Beiko RG. Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):715–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Breslow N. Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrics. 1974;30(1):89–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
  63. Donders GG, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Vereecken A, Van Bulck B, Spitz B. Pathogenesis of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(4):872–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Gupta K, Stapleton AE, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Fennell CL, Stamm WE. Inverse association of H2O2-producing lactobacilli and vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(2):446–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Rabe LK, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA. The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16 Suppl 4:S273–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Martius J, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Stamm WE, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA. Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(1):89–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, Van Lierde S. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG. 2009;116(10):1315–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Berghella V, Bega G, Tolosa JE, Berghella M. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(4):947–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rampersaud R, Planet PJ, Randis TM, Kulkarni R, Aguilar JL, Lehrer RI, Ratner AJ. Inerolysin, a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin produced by Lactobacillus iners. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(5):1034–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Macklaim JM, Fernandes AD, Di Bella JM, Hammond JA, Reid G, Gloor GB. Comparative meta-RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by Lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis. Microbiome. 2013;1(1):12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Doerflinger SY, Throop AL, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Bacteria in the vaginal microbiome alter the innate immune response and barrier properties of the human vaginal epithelia in a species-specific manner. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(12):1989–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Anahtar MN, Byrne EH, Doherty KE, Bowman BA, Yamamoto HS, Soumillon M, Padavattan N, Ismail N, Moodley A, Sabatini ME, et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity. 2015;42(5):965–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Joergensen JS, Kjaer Weile LK, Lamont RF. The early use of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics in susceptible women for the prevention of preterm birth of infectious etiology. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014;15(15):2173–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Guaschino S, De Seta F, Piccoli M, Maso G, Alberico S. Aetiology of preterm labour: bacterial vaginosis. BJOG. 2006;113 Suppl 3:46–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Claeys G, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M. Longitudinal analysis of the vaginal microflora in pregnancy suggests that L. crispatus promotes the stability of the normal vaginal microflora and that L. gasseri and/or L. iners are more conducive to the occurrence of abnormal vaginal microflora. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:116.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Ferris MJ, Norori J, Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Martin DH. Cultivation-independent analysis of changes in bacterial vaginosis flora following metronidazole treatment. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(3):1016–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Nunn KL, Wang YY, Harit D, Humphrys MS, Ma B, Cone R, Ravel J, Lai SK. Enhanced trapping of HIV-1 by human cervicovaginal mucus is associated with Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant microbiota. MBio. 2015;6(5):e01084–01015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Brotman RM, Shardell MD, Gajer P, Tracy JK, Zenilman JM, Ravel J, Gravitt PE. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(11):1723–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, Giraldo PC, Witkin SS. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(2):120. e121-125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Witkin SS, Mendes-Soares H, Linhares IM, Jayaram A, Ledger WJ, Forney LJ. Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. MBio. 2013;4(4):e00460–13.Google Scholar
  81. Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):311–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Gotkin JL, Celver J, McNutt P, Shields AD, Howard BC, Paonessa DJ, Napolitano PG. Progesterone reduces lipopolysaccharide induced interleukin-6 secretion in fetoplacental chorionic arteries, fractionated cord blood, and maternal mononuclear cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1015–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement