Skip to main content

Table 1 Plenary lectures from course leaders

From: “Microbiota, symbiosis and individuality summer school” meeting report

Presenter,

Lecture title

Description

Associated

affiliation

  

references

Thomas Pradeu,

Microbiota and

Pradeu asked “what do we mean by microbiota?” and

[2, 17]

The French National

microbiome: a

pointed out there is no single answer. He also argued that

 

Center for Scientific

conceptual analysis

our understanding of microbiota impacts our conception of

 

Research and University

 

individuality. Examining the history, meaning, and impact of

 

of Bordeaux (France)

 

the microbiota is important when making ontological and

 
  

epistemological claims concerning individuality.

 
 

Interactions between

Pradeu highlighted how the function of the immune system

[5, 1820]

 

the microbiota and the

has been reconsidered in light of microbiota research. The

 
 

immune system: an

immune response should be thought of as a dynamic

 
 

immunological point of

equilibrium, regulated by activating and inhibitory signals as

 
 

view on biological

a function of the ecological context and the encountered

 
 

individuality

microbes. Pradeu proposed a physiological individual as a

 
  

unit of functioning, composed of the host and its microbiota,

 
  

where the immune system plays a crucial role in the

 
  

unification of this plurality.

 

Scott Gilbert,

Developmental symbiosis

Gilbert argued that all metazoans have microbial symbionts

[4, 21, 22]

Swarthmore College

and the mapping of

and these are important, sometimes essential, for normal

 

(USA) and University

novel evolutionary

animal development and organ generation. For example, the

 

of Helsinki (Finland)

trajectories

gut of cows has been transformed by symbionts and led to

 
  

the emergence of their herbivory diet. The close association

 
  

of organisms and their microbiota therefore opens novel

 
  

evolutionary trajectories. Organisms have been formed by

 
  

symbiotic interactions and these close associations open

 
  

novel evolutionary trajectories.

 

Johannes Martens,

Biological individuality:

Martens provided philosophical context for the concept of

[23, 24]

University Catholique

a conceptual analysis

biological individuality. He distinguished it from other

 

of Louvain (Belgium)

 

concepts, such as unity, and argued that questions of

 
  

individuality primarily involve singling out the properties that

 
  

make an individual distinct. Productive theorizing about

 
  

individuality does, of course, require considering individuals

 
  

themselves, but it also involves considering their parts, as well as

 
  

the collectives they form.

 
 

Fraternal vs.

Martens argued that there are two concepts associated with

 
 

egalitarian transitions in

transitions in biological individuality. First, fraternal transitions

 
 

individuality: two

involve a transition in Darwinian individuality (e.g., multicellularity

 
 

processes, one concept?

and insect colonies). Second, egalitarian transitions involve a transition

 
  

in organismality, where the entities share a dependence and mutual

 
  

benefit (e.g., the eukaryotic cell). The identification of two concepts

 
  

for major transitions is helpful for exploring the influence of holobionts

 
  

on evolution at multiple levels of biological organization.

 

Jan Pieter Konsman,

Barriers and

Konsman argued that we ought not confuse the existence of

[25, 26]

The French National

obstacles in relation

a functional “axis” between the microbiota, host gut, and

 

Center for Scientific

to microbiota’s host

host brain with the presence of precise mechanistic

 

Research and

effects

interactions between the organisms involved in this axis

 

University of Bordeaux

 

(which remain largely unconfirmed). The biological barriers

 

(France)

 

have a dynamic nature and act more like borders, localized

 
  

areas over which complex regulation and interaction occurs.

 
  

Konsman concluded that methodologies and explanations

 
  

must consider host organization and other higher-level

 
  

features which can both inform and structure the

 
  

reductionistic methodologies present in biology.

 

Thomas Bosch,

The holobiont

Bosch argued that biology and medicine have historically

[11, 27, 28]

University of Kiel

imperative: towards

focused on the host, missing the important role of the

 

(Germany)

a holistic understanding

microbiota. Using his experimental work on the Hydra

 
 

of complex life processes

metaorganism as a model system for the evolution of

 
  

biological complexity, Bosch concluded that the

 
  

metaorganism perspective invites a more holistic and

 
  

integrative account of an organism.

 

Rob Knight,

Beyond the tip of

Using his research investigating the impact of microbiota on

[2933]

University of

the iceberg:

human health, Knight argued that microbiota research needs

 

California, San

discovering millions

to focus more on determining causal pathways, examining

 

Diego (USA)

more “human”

the transgenerational effects of microbiota and intervening

 
 

genes in our

on the microbiota. On the other hand, even without these

 
 

microbiomes and

possible advances, current microbiota research is already

 
 

their links to

challenging classical philosophy of biology debates—

 
 

phenotype

including debates about phenotypes and evolution, as well as

 
  

what counts as a unit of selection.