Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of LR and SR coverage

From: Annotated bacterial chromosomes from frame-shift-corrected long-read metagenomic data

Bin MEGAN assignment Completeness GC LR SR
   longest contig (%) content (%) coverage coverage
B1 Bacteroidetes bacterium OLB12 95 43.6 57.3 117.5
B2 Candidatus Accumulibacter SK-02 94 61.3 384.2 707.8
B3 Chlamydiia (class) 94 38.2 48.8 107.6
B4 Gammaproteobacteria (class) 93 40.5 25.1 56.2
B5 Bacteroidetes bacterium OLB8 93 41.2 52.1 109.9
B6 Rhodospirillales (order) 92 63.6 29.5 56.1
B7 Chlorobi bacterium OLB5 88 38.1 38.7 90.2
B8 Thauera (genus) 14 68.9 32.7 60.5
B9 Sphingobacteriales bacterium 44-15 0 40.6 10.2 23.2
B10 Bacteroidetes (phylum) 32 43.5 14.1 27.7
B11 Candidatus Contendobacter B J11 19 62.6 15.4 22.3
B12 Betaproteobacteria (class) 10 62.9 37.1 66.0
B13 Nitrospira (genus) 27 60.4 17.6 28.7
B14 Chloroflexi (phylum) 8 51.8 13.3 18.9
  1. For the longest contigs in each of the 14 bins reported in Table 1, we report the completeness as determined by CheckM, the average CG content, the average long-read coverage, and the average short-read coverage