Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of LR and SR coverage

From: Annotated bacterial chromosomes from frame-shift-corrected long-read metagenomic data

Bin

MEGAN assignment

Completeness

GC

LR

SR

  

longest contig (%)

content (%)

coverage

coverage

B1

Bacteroidetes bacterium OLB12

95

43.6

57.3

117.5

B2

Candidatus Accumulibacter SK-02

94

61.3

384.2

707.8

B3

Chlamydiia (class)

94

38.2

48.8

107.6

B4

Gammaproteobacteria (class)

93

40.5

25.1

56.2

B5

Bacteroidetes bacterium OLB8

93

41.2

52.1

109.9

B6

Rhodospirillales (order)

92

63.6

29.5

56.1

B7

Chlorobi bacterium OLB5

88

38.1

38.7

90.2

B8

Thauera (genus)

14

68.9

32.7

60.5

B9

Sphingobacteriales bacterium 44-15

0

40.6

10.2

23.2

B10

Bacteroidetes (phylum)

32

43.5

14.1

27.7

B11

Candidatus Contendobacter B J11

19

62.6

15.4

22.3

B12

Betaproteobacteria (class)

10

62.9

37.1

66.0

B13

Nitrospira (genus)

27

60.4

17.6

28.7

B14

Chloroflexi (phylum)

8

51.8

13.3

18.9

  1. For the longest contigs in each of the 14 bins reported in Table 1, we report the completeness as determined by CheckM, the average CG content, the average long-read coverage, and the average short-read coverage