Skip to main content

Table 1 Risk of bias assessment

From: The unsolved problem of otitis media in indigenous populations: a systematic review of upper respiratory and middle ear microbiology in indigenous children with otitis media

 

Reference

Did the study address a clearly focused issue?

Cohort recruitment acceptable?

Exposure accurately measured?

Outcome accurately measured?

Important confounding factors identified?

Important confounding factors accounted for?

Are the results precise?

Are the results believable?

Do results fit with other available data?

Overall quality score

1972, Stuart*

[46]

+

+

–

–

+

–

–

–

–

Poor

1975, Copeman

[44]

–

–

–

–

–

–

?

–

–

Poor

1975, Stuart

[45]

+

+

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Poor

1985, Dawson

[55]

+

–

+

+

–

–

?

–

–

Poor

1994, Leach

[20]

+

+

+

+

–

–

–

+

+

Mod

1996, Homøe

[34]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Good

1999, Parkinson

[38]

+

+

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2003, Couzos*

[40]

+

?

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Good

2003, Stuart

[49]

+

?

+

+

+

–

+

+

+

Mod

2005, Gibney

[50]

+

+

+

?

–

–

+

+

+

Poor

2006, Leach*

[51]

+

?

+

+

–

–

–

–

+

Poor

2007, Ashhurst-Smith

[37]

+

?

+

+

–

–

?

+

–

Mod

2008, Leach*

[43]

+

+

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2008, Leach*

[54]

+

+

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Poor

2009, Homøe*

[39]

+

+

+

+

–

–

–

–

–

Poor

2009, Mackenzie*

[52]

+

?

–

+

–

–

+

–

+

Poor

2010, Morris *

[53]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Good

2011, Binks

[35]

+

?

?

+

–

–

+

+

+

Poor

2012, Marsh

[56]

+

?

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2012, Sun

[36]

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Good

2013, Smith-Vaughan

[48]

+

+

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2013, Stephen*

[42]

+

?

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2015, Jervis-Bardy

[57]

+

?

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Good

2015, Leach*

[47]

+

?

+

+

–

–

+

+

+

Mod

2016, Leach*

[16]

+

?

+

+

+

–

+

+

+

Mod

  1. Data based on CASP-based risk of bias assessment. Assessment of bias pertained to the microbiology data and not to clinical data. ?, this variable was unable to be assessed
  2. *Studies where microbiological outcomes were not the primary outcome