Skip to main content

Microbiome multi-omics can accelerate human excrement composting research

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this editorial, we discuss the need for a new, long-term strategy for managing human excrement (feces and urine) to facilitate health equity and promote environmental sustainability. Human excrement composting (HEC), a human-directed process driven by highly variable and diverse microbiomes, provides a means to advance this need and we discuss how microbiome science can help to advance HEC research. We argue that the technological advancements that have driven the growth of microbiome science, including microbiome and untargeted metabolome profiling, can be leveraged to enhance our understanding of safe and efficient HEC. We conclude by presenting our perspective on how we can begin applying these technologies to develop accessible procedures for safe HEC.

“In a given time, progress aiding, with mechanisms being perfected, and knowledge increasing, [we will return human] manure to the fields. From this simple act will result, for the whole social community, a reduction of misery and an improvement of health.”

~Les Misérables, Volume 5, Book 2, Victor Hugo (1862) [1]

Modern sanitation needs a good flushing

Worldwide, over two billion people lack access to toilets or latrines, and more than 450 million people engage in open defecation, often in exposed or environmentally sensitive areas [2, 3]. Environmental and human health impacts from poor or non-existent sanitation systems persist, in both underdeveloped and developed areas [4].

Historically, human excrement (feces and urine) served as potent fertilizers contributing to soil health, agricultural productivity, and local economies [5, 6]. However, the Industrial Revolution brought rapid urbanization and denser populations, which led to excrement accumulation in streets, drinking water contamination, and the spread of human disease [7]. In response, sanitation management systems were developed that markedly improved public health but inadvertently disconnected people from their environmental impacts and fostered a myopic view of human excrement (HE). Unintended consequences of this transition were foreseen by astute observers [1], and now manifest as natural resource depletion (e.g., drinking water for flushing toilets, fossil fuels to synthesize and transport fertilizer rather than cycling nutrients locally) and infrastructure that can be prohibitively expensive to build, operate, and maintain [4]. Consequently, many populations have little choice but open defecation, exacerbating environmental disruption (e.g., eutrophication, water and soil contamination) and health disparities (e.g., diarrheal diseases). Although HE continues to be used in agriculture in parts of the world [8,9,10,11,12] it remains a largely untapped resource that is nutrient-rich, readily available, and underappreciated.

The 2015 United Nations “Transforming our World” initiative defined seventeen Sustainable Development Goals. Goal six aims to “ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.” Expanding the use of composting toilets (CTs) for HE management can contribute to attaining this goal. CTs are designed to collect HE for treatment in systems that promote aerobic decomposition, relying on bacteria, fungi, and other organisms to break down organic matter into a safe, stable, humus-like substance. The resulting compost can be used as a soil amendment, and regulatory standards or guidelines often govern its application to ensure safety and environmental protection. Unlike traditional flush toilets, CTs do not require water for flushing. They are cost-effective, transformative alternatives for HE management that provide versatile solutions across diverse socio-economic settings at personal, municipal, national, and global scales. Their broad adoption has the potential to reduce environmental stresses, human health disparities, water consumption, and pressures on aging wastewater treatment infrastructure. Additionally, these systems can generate safe, nutrient-rich soil amendments, contributing to a circular economy and promoting environmental stewardship (Fig. 1). The organisms and systems involved in the excrement-to-compost transition, and the technologies that can be applied to better understand them, are familiar to human and environmental microbiome scientists. We are therefore well-positioned as a field to advance this Sustainable Development Goal for humanitarian and environmental gains.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Environmental benefits of composting toilets. Composting toilets (left) facilitate closed-loop systems as the nutrients yielded by HEC can replace those obtained from synthetic fertilizers in agriculture. Additionally, HEC requires infrastructure that is significantly less complex and more affordable, relative to traditional wastewater treatment systems (right). Wastewater treatment plants in the United States consume 30 terawatt-hours (TWh) of energy annually, resulting in the emission of 41.7 million metric tons of carbon equivalents in 2020, while returning a relatively small portion of the nutrients present in human excreta to agricultural systems [13, 14]. Microbiome multi-omics can further advance HEC research (red circle), for example, enabling untargeted tracking of pharmaceutical residues during composting or bioprospecting for enzymes that efficiently degrade recalcitrant compounds. Figure created with BioRender.com. Values presented in the figure were obtained from [15]

Illuminating microbial dark matter

Composting is a human-directed biological reaction driven by highly variable and incredibly diverse microbiomes. Extensive research has described microbial succession in composting [16,17,18,19,20,21], identified optimal ranges of variables driving the composting processes (e.g., carbon to nitrogen ratio, moisture content, pH) [22, 23], and evaluated safety considerations in finished compost, such as pathogen load [24, 25]. Notably, researchers have observed drastic reductions in the diversity of antibacterial-resistant genes during composting of dairy manure [26, 27] and nearly 100% degradation of the antibiotics metronidazole and ciprofloxacin [28] through thermophilic composting.

Meanwhile, “-omics” technological innovations of the past two decades [29,30,31] have expanded our capabilities for studying microbial systems and have much to offer our understanding and practice of human excrement composting (HEC). DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry, which drive -omics data generation, can serve as next-generation data sensors, allowing us to probe tens of thousands of species (the majority of which we currently do not know how to grow in culture), hundreds of thousands of genes, and tens of thousands of small molecules. When two or more of these technologies, such as metagenomics, metabolomics, or metatranscriptomics, are applied together to investigate complex communities of microorganisms, we refer to this as “microbiome multi-omics.” We argue that microbiome multi-omics when applied in replicated HEC time series experiments, can enable us to develop a systems-biology-based understanding of the HEC reaction.

Microbiome science has already yielded insight into composting. For example, the accessibility of marker gene sequencing, which targets specific conserved regions of genomes (e.g., 16S ribosomal RNA) for taxonomic profiling [29], has enabled compost researchers to identify the impact of feedstocks, bulking materials, and compost preparation methods on microbial diversity [8, 17] and to track reductions in antibacterial resistance gene diversity [26]. Studying microbial succession with marker gene sequencing alongside typical measures of compost maturity (e.g., low microbial activity, between 10:1 and 20:1 C:N ratio, pathogen levels within regulatory standards) can expand our knowledge of taxa indicative of compost safety [10], demonstrate when human gut-associated taxa are depleted [32], suggest microbial taxa that could be used in compost inoculants [33], and contribute to waste-based epidemiology [34]. However, marker-gene sequencing approaches, by their nature, do not provide information on all organisms present in a sample and may be limited in resolution (e.g., only providing identification at the bacterial genus level, rather than at the species level).

Alternatively, metagenomic sequencing, which does not target specific genomic regions but rather aims to sequence all DNA present in a sample, enables broader detection and higher-resolution annotation. The considerably higher cost of metagenome sequencing often means that it makes sense to start with marker gene sequencing of many samples, for example along a dense time series, and then consider metagenome sequencing on a resulting subset of samples of interest. Metagenomic sequencing has been employed in composting systems, for example, to assess the regulation of β-glucosidase genes responsible for cellulose degradation by microbial communities across various composting phases [35]. Additionally, it has been utilized to investigate the functional profiles of microbiomes across composting phases [36] and to monitor the abundance of a wide range of antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance genes in compost and manure [37].

Microbial activity in composting systems can be studied by applying DNA sequencing technologies to profile microbial mRNA abundance using metatranscriptomics [36, 38] and/or mass spectrometry to track small molecule production (e.g., microbial metabolites), for example, to support the development of standardized detection assays for pollutants commonly present in HE (e.g., pharmaceutical residues, personal care products). In addition to human, animal, and plant health considerations, such as endocrine disruption and ecotoxicology arising from pharmaceuticals in soil amendments, ensuring that antibiotics and antifungals are degraded is important for reducing the potential for the evolution of new drug resistance mechanisms.

Combining these individual -omics approaches can enable efforts such as bioprospecting for enzymes that degrade recalcitrant compounds, such as lignocellulose [39], or ecotoxicological molecules, such as pharmaceuticals. For example, in a replicated HEC time series experiment, the decreasing abundance of targeted molecules could be linked with active microbial enzymes. Organisms that encode those enzymes in their genome could subsequently be identified, validated for the desired activity, and included in compost starter communities that increase the efficacy of target degradation. Components of this workflow have been applied already in composting systems [33, 40,41,42], and we hypothesize that integrating multi-omics technologies in this way could yield a standard protocol to bioprospect for organisms and/or enzymes that could serve as useful HEC inoculants.

Integrating multi-omics with other related approaches, including qPCR targeting relevant pathogens [43] or antibiotic resistance genes [26], and/or targeted amplicon sequencing such as pan-enterovirus assays [44], can accelerate our understanding of HEC and support research to advance current small-scale [45] and large-scale [46] best practices. It is important to note, however, that the multi-omics approaches described here have varying potential to reveal information about the individuals or populations using the systems being studied, for example linking drug use from metabolomics assays with personally identifying or ancestry-informative genetic markers obtained incidentally during metagenome sequencing. This creates ethical challenges to their application in wastewater treatment or HEC systems that must always be carefully managed [47, 48].

Toward sustainable excrement management

CTs are most commonly known for their diverse sustainability implications, including reducing water consumption and promoting nutrient cycling [49,50,51]. For instance, an average American uses 310 L of drinking water per day, 24% of which is used for flushing toilets [52]. We estimate that if residential toilets in the USA were hypothetically replaced with CTs, 9.1 trillion liters of water per yearFootnote 1 would be saved by not flushing alone, equivalent to the entire annual allotment of Colorado River water to the arid lower basin states of Nevada, Arizona, and California [53].

Certain models of CTs divert urine into the ground or designated collection chambers [54], thereby reducing odors associated with ammonia volatilization and enhancing the desiccation of HE. This process facilitates safer disposal and enables energy recovery [55]. Building on the previous example, if urine-diverting composting toilets were used, the nutrients collected from diverted urine could be repurposed as fertilizers to grow 48 million metric tons of wheat per year [56,57,58].

The broad implementation of both small and large-scale HEC systems faces massive cultural [8, 59, 60], political [61], and regulatory barriers [62,63,64]. The convenience of modern sanitation allows us to flush and forget rather than viewing HE as a resource, and misconceptions abound that HE-derived products are inferior and unsafe. A lack of awareness of alternative waste treatment systems, legal liability concerns, international plumbing codes, and local building regulations (if they exist) can be cost-prohibitive or restrictive regarding the installation of in-home CTs. A deeper understanding of the microbiological processes that drive the excrement-to-soil transition, aided by the technological innovations outlined here, can accelerate advances in the perspectives, policies, economies, and infrastructure necessary to support broader deployment and adoption of HEC. In spite of the challenges, we firmly believe HEC represents an essential component of achieving health equity and sustaining life on Earth (or on other planets, for that matter).

Growing awareness of global sustainability problems has prompted interest in revitalizing traditional agricultural practices, and the emergence of innovative, successful HEC enterprises to address the logistical challenges is underway. Organizations such as SOIL (https://www.oursoil.org), Sanergy (https://www.sanergy.com), Sanivation (https://sanivation.com), and Rich Earth Institute (https://richearthinstitute.org/) utilize varied approaches to upcycle HE into compost, animal feed through harvesting of black soldier fly larvae [65, 66], biomass fuels, and fertilizers. These innovations not only reduce resource consumption, but can provide low to no-cost fertilizers, food for livestock, and a source of energy for cooking or heating homes. We hypothesize that a better understanding of HEC microbiology would expand economic opportunities, for example through the development of inoculants or substrates that accelerate or standardize the process.

Small-scale initiatives are critical steps toward the urgently needed paradigm shift in HE management. By collaborating with community organizations and leaders, researchers can pinpoint communities that could benefit from CT installations. Through education and public outreach (e.g., demonstration sites on university campuses or at community centers) these collaborations can cultivate economic opportunities and drive technological innovations while raising awareness and fostering acceptance of circular excrement management. These efforts can provide models for scaling up in areas where new approaches are most needed, or where there is the greatest appetite for transformation.

Collectively, the knowledge gained by applying microbiome multi-omics to study HEC systems will help reduce the spread of human disease through contaminated soil and water, substantially decrease water and energy consumption, and retain nutrients in closed-loop cycles. We strongly encourage researchers, policymakers, community organizers, and funding agencies to invest resources in HEC microbiome research to harness the transformative power these microbiomes offer to create a more equitable and sustainable planet. In short, Hugo’s “given time” is now.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Change history

  • 07 October 2024

    Videobyte has been removed.

Notes

  1. 310 L per person per day × 365 days per year × 24% × 333,300,000 people = 9.1 trillion L/year

References

  1. Hugo V. Les Misérables. Unabridged edition (ISBN: 045141943X). Signet Classics; 1862.

  2. UNICEF and WHO. State of the World’s Sanitation: An urgent call to transform sanitation for better health, environments, economies and societies. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization; 2021.

  3. UN-Water. Summary progress update 2021 -- SDG 6 -- water and sanitation for all. Geneva: UN-Water; 2021. p. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flowers CC. Waste: one woman’s fight against America’s Dirty Secret. New York: The New Press; 2020.

  5. Kawa NC, Ding Y, Kingsbury J, Goldberg K, Lipschitz F, Scherer M, et al. Night soil: origins, discontinuities, and opportunities for bridging the metabolic rift. Ethnobiol Lett. 2019;10:40–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shirai Y, Leisz SJ, Kyuma K. A short history of the utilization of nightsoil in agriculture. Sanitation. 2023;7:1–24. https://doi.org/10.34416/sanitation.00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson L. Dirty old London: the Victorian fight against filth. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2014.

  8. Borker SS, Thakur A, Khatri A, Kumar R. Quality assessment, safety evaluation, and microbiome analysis of night-soil compost from Lahaul valley of northwestern Himalaya. Waste Manag. 2022;149:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.06.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Redlinger T, Graham J, Corella-Barud V, Avitia R. Survival of fecal coliforms in dry-composting toilets. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:4036–40. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.9.4036-4040.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Piceno YM, Pecora-Black G, Kramer S, Roy M, Reid FC, Dubinsky EA, et al. Bacterial community structure transformed after thermophilically composting human waste in Haiti. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0177626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sherpa AM, Byamukama D, Shrestha RR, Haberl R, Mach RL, Farnleitner AH. Use of faecal pollution indicators to estimate pathogen die off conditions in source separated faeces in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. J Water Health. 2009;7:97–107. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2009.149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simha P, Ganesapillai M. Ecological sanitation and nutrient recovery from human urine: how far have we come? A review. Sustain Environ Res SER. 2017;27:107–16. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246820391630173X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. EPA. Greenhouse gas inventory data explorer. U.S. EPA. 2023. Available from: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ghgdata/inventoryexplorer/#waste/wastewatertreatment/allgas/subcategory/all. [cited 2024 Jan 11].

  14. US Department of Energy. Wastewater Infrastructure. Office of state and community energy programs. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/scep/slsc/wastewater-infrastructure. [cited 2024 Feb 22].

  15. US Environmental Protection Agency. Basic information about biosolids. 2016. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/biosolids/basic-information-about-biosolids. [cited 2023 Jul 20].

  16. Ding J, Wei D, An Z, Zhang C, Jin L, Wang L, et al. Succession of the bacterial community structure and functional prediction in two composting systems viewed through metatranscriptomics. Bioresour Technol. 2020;313:123688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neher DA, Weicht TR, Bates ST, Leff JW, Fierer N. Changes in bacterial and fungal communities across compost recipes, preparation methods, and composting times. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ekholm J, Persson F, de Blois M, Modin O, Pronk M, van Loosdrecht MCM, et al. Full-scale aerobic granular sludge for municipal wastewater treatment – granule formation, microbial succession, and process performance. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2022;8:3138–54. Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/ew/d2ew00653g. [cited 2024 May 9].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Qiao C, Penton CR, Liu C, Tao C, Deng X, Ou Y, et al. Patterns of fungal community succession triggered by C/N ratios during composting. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakasaki K, Nag K, Karita S. Microbial succession associated with organic matter decomposition during thermophilic composting of organic waste. Waste Manag Res. 2005;23:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X05049771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang X, He X, Liang J. Succession of microbial community during the co-composting of food waste digestate and garden waste. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:9945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Haug RT. The practical handbook of compost engineering. Routledge; 1993.

  23. Epstein E. The science of composting. 1st ed. CRC Press; 1997.

  24. Vinnerås B. Comparison of composting, storage and urea treatment for sanitising of faecal matter and manure. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(17):3317–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tønner-Klank L, Møller J, Forslund A, Dalsgaard A. Microbiological assessments of compost toilets: in situ measurements and laboratory studies on the survival of fecal microbial indicators using sentinel chambers. Waste Manage. 2007;27:1144–54. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X06001735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Werner KA, Poehlein A, Schneider D, El-Said K, Wöhrmann M, Linkert I, et al. Thermophilic composting of human feces: development of bacterial community composition and antimicrobial resistance gene pool. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:824834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.824834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian X, Sun W, Gu J, Wang X-J, Zhang Y-J, Duan M-L, et al. Reducing antibiotic resistance genes, integrons, and pathogens in dairy manure by continuous thermophilic composting. Bioresour Technol. 2016;220:425–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jonidi-Jafari A, Farzadkia M, Gholami M, Mohagheghi M. The efficiency of removing metronidazole and ciprofloxacin antibiotics as pharmaceutical wastes during the process of composting. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2020;102(16):1–11.

  29. Pace NR, Stahl DA, Lane DJ, Olsen GJ. The analysis of natural microbial populations by ribosomal RNA sequences. In: Marshall KC, editor. Advances in microbial ecology. Boston: Springer, US; 1986. p. 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0611-6_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Watrous J, Roach P, Alexandrov T, Heath BS, Yang JY, Kersten RD, et al. Mass spectral molecular networking of living microbial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E1743-52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203689109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams LE, Kleinschmidt CE, Mecca S. Bacterial communities in the digester bed and liquid effluent of a microflush composting toilet system. PeerJ. 2018;6:e6077. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6077.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jurado M, López MJ, Suárez-Estrella F, Vargas-García MC, López-González JA, Moreno J. Exploiting composting biodiversity: study of the persistent and biotechnologically relevant microorganisms from lignocellulose-based composting. Bioresour Technol. 2014;162:283–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith SK, Risk BB, Holm RH, Tilley E, Chigwechokha P, Capone D, et al. Microbial community function and bacterial pathogen composition in pit latrines in peri-urban Malawi. PLOS Water. 2023;2:e0000171. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/water/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pwat.0000171&type=printable. [cited 2023 Nov 14].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang X, Ma B, Liu J, Chen X, Li S, Su E, et al. β-Glucosidase genes differentially expressed during composting. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01813-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Antunes LP, Martins LF, Pereira RV, Thomas AM, Barbosa D, Lemos LN, et al. Microbial community structure and dynamics in thermophilic composting viewed through metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38915. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu C, Li G, Qin X, Xu Y, Wang J, Wu G, et al. Profiles of antibiotic- and heavy metal-related resistance genes in animal manure revealed using a metagenomic analysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;239:113655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Martins LF, Antunes LP, Pascon RC, de Oliveira JCF, Digiampietri LA, Barbosa D, et al. Metagenomic analysis of a tropical composting operation at the são paulo zoo park reveals diversity of biomass degradation functions and organisms. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mello BL, Alessi AM, Riaño-Pachón DM, deAzevedo ER, Guimarães FEG, Espirito Santo MC, et al. Targeted metatranscriptomics of compost-derived consortia reveals a GH11 exerting an unusual exo-1,4-β-xylanase activity. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0944-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chandna P, Nain L, Singh S, Kuhad RC. Assessment of bacterial diversity during composting of agricultural byproducts. BMC Microbiol. 2013;13:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-13-99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu J, Lu Y, Shan G, He X-S, Huang J, Li Q. Inoculation with compost-born thermophilic complex microbial consortium induced organic matters degradation while reduced nitrogen loss during co-composting of dairy manure and sugarcane leaves. Waste Biomass Valori. 2019;10:2467–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0293-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bai Y, Wu D, Dolfing J, Zhang L, Xie B. Dynamics and functions of biomarker taxa determine substrate-specific organic waste composting. Bioresour Technol. 2024;393:130118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Semenov MV, Krasnov GS, Semenov VM, Ksenofontova N, Zinyakova NB, van Bruggen AHC. Does fresh farmyard manure introduce surviving microbes into soil or activate soil-borne microbiota? J Environ Manage. 2021;294:113018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Erickson DE, Simmons KM, Barrand ZA, Ridenour CL, Hawkinson PB, Lemke L, et al. Pan-Enterovirus characterization reveals cryptic circulation of clinically relevant subtypes in Arizona wastewater. bioRxiv. 2023. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.20.23297677v1.abstract.

  45. Jenkins JC. The Humanure Handbook, 4th Edition: Shit in a nutshell. Grove City: Joseph Jenkins, Inc; 2019.

  46. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater: Vol. 4 (World Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, Ed.). World Health Organization; 2006.

  47. Whitmore L, McCauley M, Farrell JA, Stammnitz MR, Koda SA, Mashkour N, et al. Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023;7:873–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. de Groot NF. Capturing human environmental DNA: ethical challenges. Digit Soc. 2023;2:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00077-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Anand CK, Apul DS. Composting toilets as a sustainable alternative to urban sanitation – a review. Waste Manage. 2014;34:329–43. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X13004923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jenkins J. The humanure handbook: a guide to composting human manure. 3rd ed. Grove City: Joseph Jenkins, Inc; 2005.

  51. Del Porto D, Steinfeld C. Composting toilet system book: a practical guide to choosing, planning and maintaining composting toilet systems. Concord: The Center for Ecological Pollution Prevention; 1999.

  52. U.S. EPA. How We Use Water. Water Sense. 2023. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/watersense/how-we-use-water. [cited 2024 Feb 24].

  53. Colorado River Compact. C.F.R. Sect. § 617l - Colorado River compact approval 1922. Available from: https://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title43/chapter12A/subchapter1&edition=prelim.

  54. von Münch E, Winker M. Technology review of urine diversion components. Sustainable sanitation - ecosan program; 2011.

  55. Getahun S, Septien S, Mata J, Somorin T, Mabbett I, Buckley C. Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities. J Environ Manage. 2020;261:110267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Mnkeni PNS, Austin LM. Fertiliser value of human manure from pilot urine-diversion toilets. Water S A. 2012;35:133–8. Available from: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/wsa/article/view/76717.

  57. Rose C, Parker A, Jefferson B, Cartmell E. The characterization of feces and urine: a review of the literature to inform advanced treatment technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2015;45:1827–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Rich Earth Institute. Loaf of Bread. Rich Earth Institute. Available from: https://richearthinstitute.org/loaf_of_bread/. [cited 2024 Jun 17].

  59. Okem AE, Odindo AO. Indigenous knowledge and acceptability of treated effluent in agriculture. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2020;12:9304. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/9304.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Drangert J-O, Nawab B. A cultural–spatial analysis of excreting, recirculation of human excreta and health—the case of North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Health Place. 2011;17:57–66. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135382921000122X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lebu S, Muoghalu CC, Salzberg A, Semiyaga S, Niwagaba CB, Manga M. Evaluation of social acceptance and market for human excreta-derived products. In: Choudhury AR, Palani SG, editors. Material and energy recovery from solid waste for a circular economy. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2024.

  62. International Code Council. International Plumbing Code. International Code Council. Available from: https://www.iccsafe.org/content/international-plumbing-code-ipc-home-page/. [cited 2024 Jun 20].

  63. IAPMO. Water Efficiency and Sanitation Standard for the Built Environment. 2nd ed. International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials; 2020. Available from: https://www.iapmo.org/we-stand.

  64. ASME. Ceramic plumbing fixtures. 2018. Report No.: A112.19.2 / CSA B45.1.

  65. Addo P, Oduro-Kwarteng S, Gyasi SF, Awuah E. Bioconversion of municipal organic solid waste in to compost using Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia Illucens). Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2022;11:515–26. https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2022.1939781.1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Blomström A-L, Lalander C, Komakech AJ, Vinnerås B, Boqvist S. A metagenomic analysis displays the diverse microbial community of a vermicomposting system in Uganda. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016;6:32453. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v6.32453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Allegra Aron, Nicholas Bokulich, Mingxun Wang, and Jason Wilder for feedback on the technologies discussed in this work and the potential applications of human excrement composting. We additionally thank Briana Lewis for a helpful discussion of our introductory quote of Les Misérables.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M. and J.G.C. wrote the main manuscript. M.J. assisted with writing and editing the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gregory Caporaso.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meilander, J., Jewell, M. & Caporaso, J.G. Microbiome multi-omics can accelerate human excrement composting research. Microbiome 12, 174 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01894-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01894-x