Skip to main content

Hyperexpansion of genetic diversity and metabolic capacity of extremophilic bacteria and archaea in ancient Andean lake sediments

Abstract

Background

The Andean Altiplano hosts a repertoire of high-altitude lakes with harsh conditions for life. These lakes are undergoing a process of desiccation caused by the current climate, leaving terraces exposed to extreme atmospheric conditions and serving as analogs to Martian paleolake basins. Microbiomes in Altiplano lake terraces have been poorly studied, enclosing uncultured lineages and a great opportunity to understand environmental adaptation and the limits of life on Earth. Here we examine the microbial diversity and function in ancient sediments (10.3–11 kyr BP (before present)) from a terrace profile of Laguna Lejía, a sulfur- and metal/metalloid-rich saline lake in the Chilean Altiplano. We also evaluate the physical and chemical changes of the lake over time by studying the mineralogy and geochemistry of the terrace profile.

Results

The mineralogy and geochemistry of the terrace profile revealed large water level fluctuations in the lake, scarcity of organic carbon, and high concentration of SO42--S, Na, Cl and Mg. Lipid biomarker analysis indicated the presence of aquatic/terrestrial plant remnants preserved in the ancient sediments, and genome-resolved metagenomics unveiled a diverse prokaryotic community with still active microorganisms based on in silico growth predictions. We reconstructed 591 bacterial and archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), of which 98.8% belonged to previously unreported species. The most abundant and widespread metabolisms among MAGs were the reduction and oxidation of S, N, As, and halogenated compounds, as well as aerobic CO oxidation, possibly as a key metabolic trait in the organic carbon-depleted sediments. The broad redox and CO2 fixation pathways among phylogenetically distant bacteria and archaea extended the knowledge of metabolic capacities to previously unknown taxa. For instance, we identified genomic potential for dissimilatory sulfate reduction in Bacteroidota and α- and γ-Proteobacteria, predicted an enzyme for ammonia oxidation in a novel Actinobacteriota, and predicted enzymes of the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle in Planctomycetota, Gemmatimonadota, and Nanoarchaeota.

Conclusions

The high number of novel bacterial and archaeal MAGs in the Laguna Lejía indicates the wide prokaryotic diversity discovered. In addition, the detection of genes in unexpected taxonomic groups has significant implications for the expansion of microorganisms involved in the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur.

Video Abstract

Background

Culture-independent tools such as metagenomics have made it possible to decipher the identity and potential metabolisms of a large fraction of the Earth’s microbiome that remains uncultivable, commonly referred to as microbial dark matter [1]. Microbial dark matter is estimated to cover over 99% of microorganisms worldwide [2], and extreme environments for life presumably harbor a large proportion [3]. Microbial communities in extreme environments can be adapted to harsh environmental conditions, in most cases combining low or high temperature [4,5,6], dryness and/or high UV radiation [6, 7], acidic or alkaline water [8,9,10], hypersalinity [11, 12], and/or high metal content [8, 9]. Unraveling the uncultured microbial fraction in extreme habitats may open opportunities for biotechnological applications [13] and may expand the theory on the limits of life on Earth and beyond.

High-altitude lakes in the arid and volcanic region of the Altiplano (Chile, Perú, Bolivia, and Argentina) are unique extreme aquatic environments with a poorly explored microbial diversity. A representative case is the Laguna Lejía, a saline, endorheic, groundwater-fed lake located at 4325 m.a.s.l. in the Chilean Altiplano [14]. Laguna Lejía has undergone rapid desiccation caused by current low precipitation (<200 mm year-1) and high evaporation rates (1500 mm year-1) [15]. As a consequence, the lake water surface has shrunk from ~10 to ~2 km2, leaving an extensive sediment outcrop (or terrace) indicating a water level 25 times higher in the late Pleistocene/early Holocene (~10.8–9.2 kyr BP) than today, and strong water level fluctuations over thousands of years [16,17,18]. In addition, water and sediment chemistry of Laguna Lejía has been influenced by the deposition of pyroclastic material from periodic eruptions of the Lascar volcano, located 5 km to the north [19]. As a result of its hydrologic and climatic history and volcanic influence, Laguna Lejía can be considered as a compelling terrestrial analog of Martian paleolakes (e.g., Jezero crater) [14], which have been suggested as potentially habitable before they underwent rapid evaporation due to a climate change ~3 Ga ago [20].

The fluctuations in the water level and chemistry of Laguna Lejía over millennia may have influenced the microbial genetic and metabolic diversity. The microbial communities inhabiting the water have been exposed to increasing salinity, while those thriving in the sediments in contact with atmospheric conditions have been also exposed to desiccation, strong daily thermal oscillations, and high UV radiation [14]. Previous studies on microbiomes from Laguna Lejía water and sediments are scarce and so far revealed Bacteroidetes (here Bacteroidota), Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes as the most dominant phyla, as well as a variable proportion (6–8%) of unidentified taxa [21, 22]. Recent efforts have been made to shed light on the proportion of unknown microorganisms by bacterial isolation and proteomic characterization [23]. However, it is barely known the taxonomy of these microorganisms below the phylum level and the metabolic capacity they have in this unique environment.

Among Laguna Lejía habitats, the ancient sediments of the terrace might have recorded the most relevant microbial community changes over thousands of years, as it has been at the forefront of the lake water level fluctuations. Microbial communities can adjust quickly to environmental disturbances by shifting their composition and relative abundance toward those populations with functional traits fitting to the new environment [24]. Alternatively, microorganisms can evolve (originating genomic changes) acquiring new functional traits that allow adaptation [25], especially over long timescales [26]. The microbiome and geochemistry of the ancient sediments of the Laguna Lejía terrace have not been investigated, yet they constitute an important legacy of the past ecological conditions of the lake.

In this work, we tested five hypotheses in the Laguna Lejía terrace: (i) the fluctuations and disconnection of the water table provided new ecological niche opportunities for microbial communities, resulting in a different microbiome from that of the wet sediments; (ii) the prokaryotic community structure along the vertical profile of the terrace differs between sediment layers, each corresponding to a specific period of time; (iii) despite the age of the sediments, the terrace currently contains metabolically active extremophilic microorganisms; (iv) the microorganisms on the terrace possess metabolic traits adapted to the extreme geochemistry of the lake; and (v) the terrace harbor novel microorganisms, as it is a poorly explored extreme environment in a remote location. To test these hypotheses, we investigated the biogeochemistry of the Laguna Lejía terrace using a multidisciplinary approach that combines shotgun metagenomics, lipid biomarkers, geochemistry, and mineralogy. To address these questions, we (a) characterized the mineralogical and geochemical (ions, stable isotopes, and lipid biomarkers) environment of the Laguna Lejía terrace, as well as dated the sediments along its vertical profile, (b) explored the composition, relative abundance, and metabolic potential of the bacterial and archaeal communities along the sediment profile using genome-resolved metagenomics, and (c) estimated in silico genome replication indices. The results contributed to unravel the extent of microbial diversity in the Laguna Lejía and expand metabolic potential to unexpected microbial taxa. In addition, the results contributed to understand and forecast the fate of microbial communities in inland aquatic systems impacted by climate change (e.g., global warming), as well as the impact of a rapid climate change on hypothetical microbial life in Martian paleolakes.

Methods

Sampling

Laguna Lejía in the Chilean Andes (4325 m.a.s.l.; 23° 30’ S, 67° 42’ W) (Fig. 1a–c) was sampled during a field campaign in November 2018. Sediment samples were collected from a 1-m high stratified sediments belonging to a 4-m high lake terrace located 10 m away from the current lake shoreline (Fig. 1d). The 1-m sampled section started at 1-m high from the base of the outcrop (Fig. 1d and e) and covers two of the lithologic phases described in previous works in the lake terrace [16, 18]. The lower half of the profile consisted of alternating beds of bentonite, diatomite, and sand (unit II), and the upper half consisted of sand, carbonates, diatomite, and a prominent clastic layer with gravel (unit III) [16, 18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study site and sampling area located in the Altiplano–Puna Plateau in the Central Andes. a and b show a sequential zoom of the location of Laguna Lejía (red pin) in northern Chile, where the Altiplano–Puna Volcanic Complex (APVC) is located. c shows the endorheic basin of Laguna Lejía surrounded by the active volcanoes Lascar and Simba. d shows the panoramic view of Laguna Lejía showing the terraces and the dry shore due to water retreat over the years. The white box indicates the location of the sampled sediment profile, located the first meter above the base of the terrace. e shows the ~1-m high vertical profile sampled. f and g zoom in the sampled profile and show the six sediment layers collected from the bottom (A) to top (F) based on their different color and texture. Starting from the first meter of the terrace, samples were collected from 1 to 1.07 m (A), 1.08 to 1.09 m (B), 1.10 to 1.35 m (C), 1.36 to 1.38 m (D), 1.39 to 1.70 m (E) and 1.71 to 1.95 m (F) high. Pictures a, b, and c are from Google Earth.

Before sampling, we removed the exposed face of the outcrop sediments (ca. 10 cm thick) with an ethanol-cleaned shovel to collect samples only from the interior and make sure to avoid the most recent external material. Six horizontal sediment layers were sampled at different depths according to different colors and textures using a clean spoon wiped with ethanol between samples (Fig. 1f and g). Samples were named as A (bottom; 0–7 cm), B (7–9 cm), C (9–35 cm), D (35–38 cm), E (38–70 cm), and F (top; 70–95 cm), and stored in 100-mL polyethylene bottles at 4°C until arrival to the laboratory (~5 days). Then, a fraction of ~100 g of each sample was stored at −80°C and lyophilized for downstream analysis. The remainder of the samples were stored at −20°C.

Radiocarbon dating

A total of 20 mg of fresh (wet weight) sample A (bottom; 0–7 cm), C (middle depth; 9–35 cm), and F (top; 70–95 cm) were used for radiocarbon analysis on a 14C-Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) dating (Beta Analytic, Inc., Miami, FL, USA). A pre-treatment consisting of acid washes with HCl was applied to decarbonate the samples. Afterwards, 14C results were obtained from the total organic content of the sediments. The analysis was conducted using the BetaCal 4.2 program and the high probability density range method [27], along with the IntCal20 database [28].

Geochemical analysis

In the six samples (A–F), soluble anions, specifically nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-), phosphate (PO43-), sulfate (SO42-), chloride (Cl-), fluoride (F-), and bromide (Br-), were determined in triplicates by ion chromatography (IC). One gram of dry sediment was suspended in 10 mL of IC-grade water, vortexed for 2 min, and incubated with agitation overnight. Samples were filtered through 0.22-µm PTFE filters (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) to remove mineral particles and 5 mL were used for analysis in a Metrohm 861 Advanced Compact Ion Chromatographer (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland) using two serial dilutions (1:1 and 1:10). Chromatographic separation of ions was performed in a Metrosep A supp 7–250 column (Metrohm AG) with a mobile phase that consisted of 3.6 mM sodium carbonate with a flow rate of 0.7 mL·min-1. Anion quantification was performed with a 6-point calibration curve from each commercial anion standard (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The concentration of elements (e.g., Nitrogen) was calculated as the sum of the elemental concentration of the different anion species (e.g., NO2- and NO3-). Since nitrite (NO2-) was below quantification limit (<1.6 ppb), the elemental concentration of nitrogen was calculated considering nitrate alone (i.e., NO3--N).

Elemental analysis of the cationic soluble fraction was determined in triplicates with the remaining 5 mL of the previous filtered solution of the sediment using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). A semiquantitative analysis was performed using a PerkinElmer NexION 2000 ICP-MS instrument (PerkinElmer Inc.) with 47 elements used as external standards (Table S1) following the Method 3052 from the Environmental Protection Agency [29].

pH was measured in triplicates in a suspension of substrate:IC-grade water (1:2.5) with a Eutech pH700 Meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Mineralogical analysis

Mineralogical characterization of the six powdered samples was performed with X-ray diffraction (XRD). XRD profiles were obtained with a Bruker D8 Eco Advance diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) and a Lynxeye XE-T linear detector. Samples were scanned from 5° to 60° (2Ɵ) with a step size of 0.05° and a step duration of 1 s. The X-ray generator was operated at 40 kV and 25 mA. Phase identification was achieved by comparing the measured diffraction patterns (diffractograms) with those of the PDF-2 Database using the DIFFRAC.EVA software (Bruker AXS).

Bulk geochemistry analysis

The six lyophilized samples were homogenized using a mortar and pestle. Stable isotope composition of organic carbon (δ13C) and total nitrogen (δ15N) was measured by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) using a MAT 253 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following analytical methods by the U.S. Geological Survey [30], as described elsewhere [31]. Briefly, samples of ~300 mg dry weight were decarbonated with HCl (37%). After equilibration for 24 h and pH adjustment to neutral values (using ultrapure water), the residue was dried (50°C in an oven) for 72 h and then analyzed by IRMS (MAT 253). Ratios of the heavy over the light stable isotope of nitrogen (δ15N) and organic carbon (δ13C) were reported in the standard per mil notation (‰) using three certified standards (USGS41, IAEA-600, and USGS40), with an analytical precision of 0.1‰. In parallel to stable isotope analysis, the content of total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) were determined using an elemental analyzer (HT Flash, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reported as percentage (%) relative to dry weight.

Lipid biomarkers extraction, fractionation, and analysis

Lipids from 13–26 g of dry weight samples were extracted with organic solvents (dichloromethane and methanol, 3:1 v:v) using an ultrasound bath (details in [7]). A mixture of internal standards (tetracosane-D50, myristic acid-D27, and 2-hexadecanol) was added prior to the extraction for quantification (recovery of 78 ± 14 %). The total lipid extract was separated into three polarity fractions according to protocols described elsewhere [7]: non-polar, containing hydrocarbons; acidic, containing fatty acids; and polar, containing alcohols. For analysis, compounds of the acidic fraction were methylated with BF3 (Sigma Aldrich) in MeOH at 80 °C for 30 min. Compounds of the polar fraction were derivatized using BSTFA (Sigma Aldrich) at 80 °C for 60 min. Thus, acids and alcohols were detected as fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) and trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivates, respectively. The hydrocarbons of the non-polar fraction did not need to be derivatized for analysis. Procedural blanks were performed throughout the entire process to confirm that the compounds identified were indigenous to the samples.

Organic compounds in the samples were identified and quantified using a gas chromatography system (6850 GC) coupled to a mass spectrometer (5975 VL MSD) with a triple-axis detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The GC-MS operated at an electron ionization of 70 eV and scanned from 50 to 650 m/z (analytical details in [32]). Compound identification was based on retention time and mass spectra comparison with reference materials and the NIST mass spectral database. Quantification was performed with the use of external standards of n-alkanes (C10 to C40), FAMEs (C6 to C24), and n-alkanols (C14, C18, and C22) (Sigma-Aldrich).

DNA extraction

Metagenomic DNA of the six sediment samples was extracted with E.Z.N.A. soil DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, GA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. To increase DNA concentration of each sample, separated extractions (from two up to nine) of 0.5 g of dry weight sample were performed and combined at the elution step. The variation in the number of DNA extractions per sample was to achieve a minimum of 5 ng of total DNA in each sample. A negative control of the kit was also conducted following the same procedure without sample. DNA concentrations were determined with Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA) using Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). The total amount of DNA obtained was 291 ng for sample A, 6 ng for sample B, 159 ng for sample C, 154 ng for sample D, 20 ng for sample E, and 165 ng for sample F. Genomic DNA extractions were stored at −20°C until sequencing analysis.

Metagenomic sequencing

Microbial community structure of each sediment sample was determined by the construction of 150 bp paired-end libraries on Illumina NextSeq 550 sequencer (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at the Genomic Service in Madrid Science Park Foundation (Spain). Briefly, DNA was purified, quantified, and quality checked using both Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then, 5 ng (for samples B and E) or 25 ng (for samples A, C, D, and F) were mechanically fragmented on a Bioruptor Sonicator (Diagenode, Liège, Belgium) and DNA fragments were used as an input for library preparation using NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). DNA concentration of the negative control of the extraction was below the detection limit of the bioanalyzer and was then excluded from library preparation. Libraries were validated and quantified using the 2100 Bioanalyzer and were then pooled in equimolar concentrations, purified using Agencourt AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and titrated by quantitative PCR using Kapa-SYBR FAST qPCR kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) in LightCycler 480 System (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Final library pools were sequenced using NextSeq 500 High Output kit v2.5 (Illumina) on an Illumina NextSeq 550 sequencer.

Metagenomic assembly and annotation

Reads from NextSeq sequencing of metagenomic DNA were trimmed and quality-filtered using BBduck (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap) and Sickle (https://github.com/najoshi/sickle). High-quality reads were assembled using MetaSPAdes [33] and open reading frames (ORFs) from scaffolds of at least 1 kb length were predicted using Prodigal in “meta” mode [34]. Taxonomic annotation of predicted genes were performed using DIAMOND blast [35] against UniRef100 database (December 2017) [36], which contains the taxonomic and functional information of the protein sequences. Sequencing coverage of each scaffold was calculated by mapping sample reads using Bowtie 2 [37].

Metagenomic binning: reconstruction of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs)

Scaffolds were clustered into genome bins using different algorithms on the basis of (i) tetranucleotide frequencies and differential coverage across samples using ABAWACA 1.07 [38], (ii) tetranucleotide frequencies using emergent self-organizing maps (tetra-ESOM) [39], and (iii) differential coverage and tetranucleotide frequency patterns using MaxBin 2 [40], using 107 and 40 single-copy marker genes. For ABAWACA analyses, scaffolds were fragmented in two group sizes: 3–5 kb and 5–10 kb. ESOM analyses were only done with the 3–5-kb set. Genome bins resulted from all binning algorithms were aggregated using DAS Tool [41] to obtain non-redundant and high-quality bins and were then manually curated using uBin [42] according to % GC content, coverage pattern, and taxonomic annotation of scaffolds. Final bins were checked for >60% completeness and <10% contamination based on the presence and number of bacterial/archaeal single copy genes (SCGs) [43] using uBin [42]. Additional assessment of the quality of the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were performed with CheckM v1 [44]. Recovered genomes were dereplicated using dRep [45] to identify groups of highly similar genomes and selected the most complete and representative across genome sets at 99% similarity between genome alignments (strain threshold).

In situ genome replication indices

To predict if bacteria were actively growing in the samples, we calculated the replication index (iRep index) in the draft-quality MAGs [46]. The iRep index assumes that microorganisms that are actively replicating have higher copies of the genome at the origin of replication than at the terminus. Therefore, iRep values are the ratio between the gene coverage at the origin and terminus of replication, with ≤ 1 indicating the absence of replication. Archaea can have multiple origins of replication, making the iRep assumption invalid, and thus the iRep index was only calculated for Bacteria. iRep indices were calculated for each representative genome with >70% completeness and <10% contamination, based on mapping data generated with Bowtie 2 in “sensitive” mode [37].

Prokaryotic community profile

Prokaryotic community composition and relative abundance across all samples was calculated by using the abundance of scaffolds containing the gene encoding for the ribosomal protein S3 (rpS3). For taxonomic annotation of the rpS3 gene, scaffolds were searched against the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB; release r95) [47] using usearch [48]. Thresholds of percent identity was used for taxonomic classification of the rpS3 gene. Criteria for rpS3 gene classification was based on cutoffs similar to those for 16S rRNA gene [2] and were ≥99% for species, 95–98% for genus, 88–94% for family, 84–87% for order, 80–83% for class, 60–79% for phylum, and <60% for kingdom level. Relative abundance of a specific family was estimated by the sum of coverage of the rpS3-bearing scaffolds belonging to that family (Table S2). For sample comparison, coverages were normalized to the sequencing depth.

Metabolic potential of the entire prokaryotic community and individual MAGs

Proteins previously predicted with Prodigal [34], from both the prokaryotic community assemblies and the reconstructed MAGs, were used to assess the metabolic potential of the microorganisms from the Laguna Lejía terrace. The metabolic potential was determined by assigning the protein sequences of the prokaryotic community or the reconstructed MAGs to KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Orthologs (KO) by homology search using hidden Markov models (HMMs) and score thresholds for reliable KO assignments [49]. Finally, a list of key enzymes, KO numbers, and genes from specific metabolic pathways of interest in this extreme environment (e.g., arsenic metabolism or resistance) were used in this study (Table S3). For the prokaryotic community, the relative abundance of a metabolic pathway was estimated by the sum of scaffold coverage bearing the gene(s) of interest (Table S3). Scaffolds bearing genes of interest were previously normalized to the sequencing depth. For the MAGs, the presence or absence of a given metabolic pathway is shown based on the presence of at least one specific gene to that pathway.

To verify that amo genes identified in archaeal and bacterial MAGs were not contamination from binning, gene arrangement, and phylogenetic analyses were performed with amo genes from the Lejía MAGs and those from the archaeal and bacterial genomes present in reference databases (Text S1). In addition, to check for the presence of carbon monoxide dehydrogenases (CODH) form I or II in the Lejía MAGs, a phylogenetic analysis was performed with CoxL sequences from the Lejía genomes and those from the Swiss-Prot database (Text S2).

Phylogenomics

Taxonomic classification of recovered MAGs was conducted with GTDB-tk [47, 50] against the GTDB (release r95) [51]. The novelty of MAGs at a specific taxonomic level was considered when they were annotated as unclassified [52].

Using the GTDB-Tk assignments above, the 591 MAGs were split into Bacteria (572 genomes) and Archaea (19 genomes). Protein sequences were predicted with Pyrodigal v2.0.4 [34, 53] and used to create a local database for each domain. We used HMMER v3.3.2 [54] to search against each domain database, using the profiles of 30 universal ribosomal proteins from PhyloSift [55] and an e-value cutoff of 1E−10. Sequences were extracted with Pullseq (https://github.com/bcthomas/pullseq) and all cases of multiple homologs in a genome were removed. The datasets were aligned with MAFFT E-INS-I (v.7.505) [56], trimmed with BMGE version 1.12 [57] (BLOSUM30), and concatenated. For each concatenation, we constructed phylogenies in IQ-TREE v2.0.5 [58] with the model automatically selected by Modelfinder [59] out of the WAG, JTT, and LG replacement matrices (-m MFP -mset WAG,JTT,LG). For Archaea, we also constructed a phylogeny under the posterior mean site frequency (PMSF) model [60] LG+C60+R10, using the previous phylogenies as guide trees. Branch supports were calculated with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap [61] and 1000 aLRT SH-like [62] replicates. Phylogenies were visualized with iTOL v5 [63].

Statistical analysis

A Pearson correlation analysis was performed in R software [64] with the package “rstatix” (v.0.7.2) [65] between the abundance of each phylum and the concentration of soluble elements and minerals to elucidate the variables that may have contributed most to explain the variability of the microbial communities in the terrace profile. Then, geochemical and mineral variables with statistically significant correlations (p-values <0.05) above 0.8 and below −0.8 were included in a principal component analysis (PCA). The PCA was performed with the software CANOCO5 v.5.12 (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY) to explore the variability in the prokaryotic composition at the phylum level between the six terrace layers of the Laguna Lejía. Then, the environmental variables were projected in the ordination space to aid interpretation. The abundance of phyla and environmental variables were centered prior to the statistical analysis. A second analysis based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the Bray–Curtis distances at the rpS3 gene level was performed to confirm the differences in the prokaryotic community composition between the six sediment layers of the Laguna Lejía terrace. Prokaryotic community richness and Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H’) were calculated using the vegan package in R [66].

Results

Age, mineralogy, and elements of the Laguna Lejía terrace

The organic carbon of samples A (0–7 cm), C (9–35 cm), and F (70–95 cm) (Fig. 1f and g) were radiocarbon dated to 20,920 ± 70 years BP (before present), 22,180 ± 70 years BP, and 21,580 ± 70 years BP, respectively. Considering a reservoir effect (discussed later), 14C-corrected ages were estimated in ~11,000 years BP for sample A, ~10,650 years BP for sample C, and ~10,300 years BP for sample F (Figure S1).

The mineral composition of the terrace sediments showed differences along the vertical profile (Fig. 2a). Samples A, C, E, and F were composed mainly of magnesium calcite (31–78%), a variable proportion of feldspars (anorthite, andesine, and albite) (16–45%), and halite (3–4%). By contrast, samples B and D were mainly composed of feldspars (67–86%) and, in the case of B, gypsum (29%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mineralogical and geochemical composition of the six sediment samples from the Laguna Lejía terrace (10.3–11 kyr BP). a Mineralogical composition of the crystalline fraction measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The minerals with the blue color scale are feldspars. b Major and c minor elements in the soluble fraction of sediment samples. The sulfur concentration was calculated from sulfate, and the nitrogen concentration was calculated from nitrate since nitrite was below the quantification level (1.6 ppb). Error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicate measurements

The concentration of elements in the soluble fraction of the sediment samples showed a similar trend as the mineralogy (Fig. 2b and c). The samples with the highest proportion of magnesium calcite and halite (A, C, E, and F) showed the highest concentrations of elements in general, especially Na (14–32 mg · g-1 dw), Cl (11–19 mg · g-1 dw), Mg (2–15 mg · g-1 dw), and SO42--S (5–20 mg · g-1 dw). By contrast, the samples with the highest proportion of feldspars and/or gypsum (B and D) showed the lowest concentration of elements, with the exception of SO42--S in B (10–13 mg · g-1 dw). Other relevant elements in the terrace, although present in minor concentrations, were NO3--N (4–30 µg · g-1 dw), Li (7–61 µg · g-1 dw), or Ar (2–7 µg · g-1 dw). The pH of the six sediment samples was similar (pH = 8.2 ± 0.1).

Bulk geochemistry and lipids of the Laguna Lejía terrace

The concentration of TOC, TN, and total lipids followed a similar trend to that of minerals and elements (Fig. 3a, b, and c). Samples A, C, E, and F contained the highest concentrations of TOC (0.9–1.2 %), TN (0.10–0.12 %), and total lipids (16–36 µg · g-1 dw), while samples B and D showed the lowest TOC (0.1–0.2 %), total lipids (7–9 µg · g-1 dw), and TN (not detected). The δ13C of TOC varied along the terrace profile from −17‰ to −22‰, and the δ15N of the TN, from 1.6‰ to 6.1‰.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Lipid and bulk isotopic composition of the organic matter in the six sediment samples from the Laguna Lejía terrace. a Total organic carbon (TOC) and stable-carbon isotopic ratio (δ13C). b Total nitrogen (TN) and stable-nitrogen isotopic ratio (δ15N). TN concentration was not detected in samples B and D. c Composition of the three polarity fractions of lipids (non-polar, blue color shades; acidic, red color shades; and polar, green color shades). Error bars represent the standard deviation of triplicates. Error bars in δ13C are behind the dots and are smaller than the dots’ size

The most abundant lipid compounds were those from the acidic and polar fractions, particularly the straight-chain or normal alkanoic acids (a.k.a. n-fatty acids) (3–14 µg · g-1 dw) and n-alkanols (1–10 µg · g-1 dw), as well as sterols (1–7 µg · g-1 dw). By contrast, the n-alkanes, alkenes, and isoprenoids (non-polar fraction) were detected in lower concentration in all samples (<2 µg · g-1 dw). The molecular distributions of n-alkanes (C16-C29), n-fatty acids (C12-C30), and n-alkanols (C14-C28) showed compounds of both low (≤C21) and high (>C21) molecular weight (Figure S2, S3, and S4). In the n-alkanes distribution, a unimodal pattern was found with dominance of C21 or C27 depending on the sample (Figure S2). In the n-fatty acids series, a bimodal distribution was defined by C16 and C24 (Figure S3). The n-alkanols series was dominated by C22, except in the sample A, where C24 was more abundant (Figure S4). Other lipid compounds detected in concentrations relevant in the three polarity fractions were the alkenes C18:1 and C22:1 (Figure S2), a few branched (mostly i/a-C15:0) and monounsaturated (mostly C18:1) fatty acids (Figure S3), and sterols mainly consisting of phytosterols (β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and campesterol) and cholesterol or cholesterol-derived compounds (Figure S4).

Prokaryotic community structure and influence of environmental conditions

We used the taxonomic annotation of the rpS3 gene from assembled metagenomes reads against GTDB to identify the prokaryotic community members and their relative abundance on the Laguna Lejía terrace. The most abundant bacterial phyla in the six samples were Actinobacteriota (23–40%), followed by Proteobacteria (12–35%), Chloroflexota (4–16%), Patescibacteria (also known as candidate phylum radiation or CPR) (7–15%), Planctomycetota (4–13%), Gemmatimonadota (2–9%), and Bacteroidota (1–8%) (Fig. 4a). Other bacterial phyla were below 3% in the six samples. The six samples also showed a relatively high proportion of unclassified bacteria at the phylum level (8–23%). Below the phylum level, the orders Gaiellales, Solirubrobacterales, and UBA5794 (Actinobacteriota), as well as the class Gammaproteobacteria and the order Kilonellales (Proteobacteria) were the most abundant taxa in the Lejía terrace (>5% in at least one sample) (Table S2). Only two archaeal phyla were identified, Thermoproteota and Nanoarchaeota (the latter, DPANN superphylum). The phylum Thermoproteota was mainly present in samples B (2%) and F (5%), and Nanoarchaeota, in the sample A (3%). The six samples showed Shannon indices (H’) that vary from 3.9 to 4.8 and a richness (S) that vary from 175 to 334 (Figure S5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Prokaryotic community composition and metabolic potential of the Laguna Lejía terrace sediments (A to F). a Prokaryotic community composition at the phylum level (blue color scale) based on the rpS3 gene similarity to the GTDB database (r95). The heatmap is made by summing scaffold coverage containing the rpS3 gene, normalized by sequencing depth, summed by phylum and sample, and then log-transformed to help visualization of the less abundant phyla. b Prokaryotic metabolic potential (gray color scale) based on the prediction of key enzymes. The heatmap is made by summing scaffold coverage containing genes encoding for specific key enzymes, normalized by sequencing depth, summed by metabolism and sample, and then log-transformed to help visualization of the less abundant metabolisms. Key genes and enzymes involved in each specific metabolism are listed in Table S3. No enzymes were annotated to the 3-HP bi-cycle and N2 fixation. "Un." means unclassified

The PCA to explore the variability in the prokaryotic community composition at the phylum level between sediment layers showed three different groups of samples (A, C, and E; B and F; and D) (Figure S6). The PCoA analysis at the rpS3 gene level also confirmed the prokaryotic community differences, with sample D being the most different (Figure S7). Despite such differences, the distinct grouping of samples based on geochemistry and mineralogy (A, C, E, and F versus B and D, Figs. 2 and 3) indicated a low relationship between the prokaryotic community structure and the geochemistry and mineralogy of the Laguna Lejía terrace. Still, significant Pearson correlations (p-value < 0.05) were identified between certain phyla and the geochemistry and/or mineralogy (Table S4 and S5). For instance, the highly abundant Actinobacteriota, mainly comprised by the orders Gaiellales, Solirubrobacterales, and UBA5794, were positively correlated (p-value < 0.05) with anorthoclase and anorthite feldspars.

Predicted prokaryotic metabolisms in the Laguna Lejía terrace

The metabolic potential of the prokaryotic community from the Laguna Lejía terrace was determined based on the relative abundance of predicted and annotated key enzymes (Table S3) in metagenome assemblies (Fig. 4b and Table S6). The most relevant metabolisms predicted in the Lejía prokaryotes were those related to carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur biogeochemical cycles as well as to the transformation of toxic compounds (e.g., arsenic and halogenated compounds).

Predicted enzymes involved in assimilatory sulfate reduction (e.g., CysN and CysJ) comprised 10–17% of the total predicted and annotated proteins, and those for thiosulfate oxidation (e.g., SoxA, SoxB, or SoxC), 1–3%. A minor proportion was detected for enzymes involved in dissimilatory sulfate reduction (e.g., Sat, AprA, AprB, DrsA, or DsrB) (0.1–1.3%). Predicted enzymes involved in dissimilatory nitrate reduction (e.g., NarG, NapA, or NrfA) comprised 3–5%, and denitrification enzymes (e.g., NirS, NirK, NorB, or NosZ) accounted for 4–6%. In addition, predicted enzymes involved in nitrification and/or methane oxidation (e.g., AmoA/PmoA) comprised 1–3%, and those involved in carbon monoxide (CO) oxidation (e.g., CoxL, CoxM, or CoxS) were present in high relative abundance (7–15%).

The most relevant carbon fixation pathway predicted in the prokaryotic community was the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle (1–3%), based on the annotation of Rubisco enzymes (RbcL, RbcS) and a phosphoribulokinase (prkB) involved in CO2 assimilation. Other enzymes specific for the Wood–Ljungdahl (WL) pathway (e.g., anaerobic CO dehydrogenase) and the 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate (3-HP/4HB) cycle (e.g., 3-hydroxypropionyl-CoA dehydratase) were also predicted in low abundance (<0.5%).

Interestingly, the prokaryotic community of the Laguna Lejía terrace showed high relative abundance of predicted enzymes involved in arsenate reduction (e.g., ArsA, ArsB, ArsC, ArsH, or Acr3) and arsenite oxidation (e.g., AoxA or AoxB) (23–27%), as well as in the transformation of halogenated compounds (e.g., DehH or DhaA) (7–14%), and multidrug efflux pumps (15–20%) in the six sediment samples.

Diversity and novelty of MAGs recovered from the Laguna Lejía terrace

A compendium of 591 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered from the Laguna Lejía terrace, 572 being from bacteria and 19 from archaea. Bacterial MAGs belonged to 22 phyla, mainly to Actinobacteriota (112), Proteobacteria (112), Patescibacteria (85), Bacteroidota (84), Chloroflexota (52), and Planctomycetota (48) (Fig. 5a). In contrast to the broad variety of bacterial phyla in the Laguna Lejía terrace, archaeal MAGs only belonged to two phyla, Thermoproteota (15) and Nanoarchaeota (4) (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Maximum Likelihood unrooted phylogenies (model selected in IQ-TREE by Modelfinder) of the new a 572 bacterial genomes and b 19 archaeal genomes reconstructed from the Laguna Lejía terrace. Phylogenies were constructed using a concatenation of 30 ribosomal proteins. In brackets, the number of MAGs at the phylum level

All bacterial MAGs were assigned to a known phylum, but some of them were unclassified at lower taxonomic levels (Fig. 6a). Specifically, 1% of the MAGs were not assigned to a known class, 2% to a known order, 10% to a known family, 64% to a known genus, and 99.7% to a known species. The MAGs that were not assigned to a known class or order were from phyla Actinobacteriota (4%, 4 MAGs), Patescibacteria (5%, 4 MAGs), Firmicutes (17%, 1 MAG), and Chloroflexota (2%, 1 MAG) (Fig. 6b). All archaeal MAGs were assigned up to a known family (Fig. 6a). Below the family level, about 16% and 74% of the archaeal MAGs were not assigned to a known genus and species, respectively.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Novelty quantification of total bacterial and archaeal MAGs from the Laguna Lejía terrace. a Proportion of classified (gray) and unclassified (white) total archaeal and bacterial MAGs at different taxonomic levels using GTDB. In brackets, the number of unclassified MAGs. b Proportion of classified (gray) and unclassified (white) total archaeal (asterisks) and bacterial MAGs grouped by phylum at different taxonomic levels.

Metabolic potential and replication rates of MAGs from the Laguna Lejía terrace

The predicted metabolic potential of the 591 prokaryotic MAGs, their relative abundances along the Lejía terrace profile, and their replication indices (calculated only on those that are unique over the 591, i.e., dereplicated) are described in Table S7. A summary of the metabolic potential, relative abundances, and replication indices of the MAGs grouped by phylum is shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Genomic features, predicted metabolic potential, and replication (iRep) indices of 591 MAGs recovered from the Laguna Lejía terrace grouped by phylum. The completeness of purple bars within cells represents the abundance of total MAGs that have annotated at least one key enzyme for a specific metabolic pathway within a phylum. Key enzymes involved in each specific metabolism are listed in Table S3. No enzymes were annotated to the 3-HP bicycle and N2 fixation. Color gradients represent the mean relative abundances (red) or iRep values (green) of dereplicated MAGs for each phylum. The genomic features and predicted metabolic potential and replication indices of each individual MAG are shown in Table S7

CO oxidation, dissimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification, assimilatory sulfate reduction, and thiosulfate oxidation were the most abundant and widespread metabolisms related to carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur biogeochemical cycles in the recovered MAGs (Fig. 7). By contrast, nitrification, dissimilatory sulfate reduction, and three CO2 fixation pathways identified in the Lejía MAGs (CBB, 3-HP/4-HB, and WL) were less abundant.

Potential nitrite oxidoreductases, involved in nitrification, were annotated in Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Firmicutes, among other phyla (Table S7). Since the KEGG database does not differentiate between nitrite oxidoreductases and nitrate reductases (e.g., K00370 and K00371), both annotations were considered. Ammonia monooxygenases (also involved in nitrification) were identified in Thermoproteota and one unclassified Actinobacteriota MAG (class UBA4738, order AC-67; Table S7). Gene arrangement analysis (Figure S8) and phylogenetic trees (File S1 and S2) of amoABC genes confirmed their presence in the archaeal MAGs and in the bacterium MAG. For instance, amo gene arrangements were similar between closely related genomes, with few changes in orientation (Figure S8). In addition, the bacterial amoC gene from the Actinobacteriota MAG was located within the bacterial amoC genes in the phylogenetic tree (File S1), ruling out possible contamination of archaeal amo genes during binning.

Enzymes involved in dissimilatory sulfate reduction, such as adenylylsulfate reductases, were predicted in Bacteroidota and α- and γ-Proteobacteria (Table S7). Apart from Cyanobacteria and some Actinobacteriota MAGs, the Rubisco (rbcL or rbcS) and/or phosphoribulokinases involved in CBB were predicted in γ-Proteobacteria, Gemmatimonadota (order SG8-23), Plantomycetota (Phycisphaerales), and one Nanoarchaeota MAG (Pacearchaeales) (Table S7). Moreover, CO dehydrogenases form I, involved in CO oxidation, were also predicted in a large proportion of the Lejía MAGs (Figure S9). Interestingly, most of the MAGs from the Laguna Lejía terrace encoded enzymes for arsenic (e.g., Ars and Aox) and copper (e.g., Cop and Cus) metabolism and/or resistance, transformation of halogenated compounds (DehH or DhaA), and multidrug efflux systems.

Average genome replication (iRep) values of bacterial MAGs were between 1.3 and 1.4 in samples A–D and F, and 2.4 in sample E (Fig. 8). In all samples, iRep values showed a wide variability, ranging from ~1.1 to 4.3 in samples B and F and up to 4.7 in sample E.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Predicted genome replication (iRep values) of bacterial MAGs from the Laguna Lejía terrace at the time of sampling. The dashed line represents the threshold above which population genomes are considered to be replicating. N in each sample is: 73 for A, 73 for B, 111 for C, 67 for D, 41 for E, and 73 for F

Discussion

Sediments from the Laguna Lejía terrace revealed a saline, sulfur-rich environment with large-scale water level fluctuations between ca. 10.3 and 11 kyr BP

The geochemistry, mineralogy, and radiocarbon dating of the Laguna Lejía terrace allowed the reconstruction of the hydrogeochemical history of the lake over the last millennia. Conventional 14C ages (i.e., raw ages) of the sedimentary organic matter were similar along the 1-m high terrace profile, with the middle layer (C; ~22,000 years BP) being older than the upper (F; ~21,500 years BP), and the lower (A; ~21,000 years). These relatively high radiocarbon ages and their inversion with depth suggest a reservoir effect that could overestimate the actual age of the sediments. The reservoir effect is the phenomenon whereby the radiocarbon ages of lake sediments are anomalously old because there is an input of dissolved ancient carbonates from groundwater (with a lower 14C level than the atmosphere) entering the lake [67, 68]. Conventional radiocarbon ages of another 4-m high terrace from Laguna Lejía were lower (11,700–15,490 years BP) than those of our samples, but showed a similar age inversion with depth [16,17,18] consistent with changes in the degree of a reservoir effect as lake water level fluctuated [16]. Based on the location of our 1-m high profile relative to the 4-m high of the total terrace [16, 18], our sediment samples correspond to the lithologic units II and III and should have 14C-corrected ages between 10,300 and 11,000 years BP (Figure S1). Given this chronostratigraphic relationship, we applied a reservoir effect correction of ~9900–12,300 years, resulting in 14C-corrected ages of ~11,000 years BP for sample A (bottom), ~10,650 years BP for sample C (middle), and ~10,300 years BP for sample F (top). If the hypothesis of the reservoir effect is the factor explaining the relative old ages and their inversion with depth, then the section of the terrace studied here correspond to a time interval of ca. 700 years.

The geochemistry of the Laguna Lejía terrace provided evidence for a sulfur-rich saline environment influenced by the volcanic activity and climatic conditions of the region. The Laguna Lejía is located in a volcanic area near the Lascar volcano [14], which is currently active [19] and emits high concentrations of SO2, HCl, H2S, and HF [69]. The low precipitation (<200 mm year-1) and high evaporation rates (1500 mm year-1) of the region [15, 17] favor the evaporation of the water and, consequently, the concentration of salts. For instance, the most abundant elements and the pH in the Laguna Lejía terrace are consistent with the lake water chemistry reported in Grosjean et al. (1995) [17] (pH of 8.7 and high concentrations of SO42- (28 g L-1), Cl- (9.9 g L-1), Mg2+ (5.9 g L-1), and Na+ (1.6 g L-1)). In addition, metals and metalloid elements detected in different concentrations in the terrace (i.e., Li, B, F, and As) can also be explained as a result of the volcanic activity or weathering of extensive volcanic rocks [70,71,72].

Differences in the concentration of elements, mineralogy, lipid biomarkers, TOC, and TN along the Lejía terrace profile suggested large-scale water level fluctuations over the ~700 years. Samples A, C, E, and F had a relatively higher proportion of magnesium calcite and halite than B and D (Fig. 2a). This mineralogical composition in A, C, E, and F coincided with a higher concentration of elements (e.g., Cl, Na, SO42-_S, and Mg), lipid biomarkers, TOC, and TN than in B and D (Fig. 2b), suggesting periods of desiccation (A, C, and E–F) and water recharge events (B and D). As water evaporates, chemical species (Cl-, Na+, Mg+2, CO32-, etc.) and organic matter (i.e., TOC and lipid biomarkers) tend to concentrate in the water column of the lake and accumulate in the sediments. By contrast, lake water recharge dilutes inorganic and organic material in the water column and accumulates relatively less in the sediments. Interestingly, Geyh et al. (1999) [16] and Grosjean et al. (1995) [17] described three large-scale water level fluctuations (25 m to 7 m) in the Laguna Lejía between 10,300 and 11,000 years BP. According to our geochemical and mineralogical results, five periods of alternating desiccation (A, C, and E–F) and water recharge events (B and D) might have occurred in the Laguna Lejía during these ~700 years.

Laguna Lejía terrace preserves aquatic/terrestrial plant remnants and harbors metabolically active microorganisms

The higher proportion of polar and acidic lipid families over the non-polar ones in all sediment layers suggested a well-preserved biomass in the terrace. The n-alkanes are the most resistant of the three lipid families to chemical alteration over time [73], whereas n-fatty acids and n-alkanols contain functional groups (i.e., carboxylic and hydroxyl, respectively) that are more prone to decay. The higher relative abundance of functionalized (n-fatty acids and n-alkanols) over non-functionalized (n-alkanes) hydrocarbons in all sediment layers (Fig. 3c) suggested good preservation of lipids in the Laguna Lejía terrace.

The molecular distribution of the major lipid families (i.e., n-alkanes, n-fatty acids, n-alkanols, and sterols) revealed preservation of ancient biomass from aquatic and terrestrial sources. Despite the taxonomic specificity of lipid biomarkers is limited (i.e., they can only be assigned to a general group of organisms), their stability in the geological record for billions of years [74, 75] makes them relevant biomolecules for paleobiological reconstructions [7, 76]. The identification of lipid biomarkers attributed to aquatic macrophytes (C21 n-alkane; Figure S2) [77] and terrestrial plants (C27 n-alkane, C24 n-fatty acid, and/or C22 n-alkanols; Figure S3 and S4) [78] suggested the presence of ancient plant biomass inhabiting the lake or its surroundings when the water level was higher. The presence of phytosterols (campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol) from mostly vascular plants [79] in all samples also supported this notion and is consistent with the vegetation associated to the Laguna Lejía [80].

A prominent peak at C16 within the n-fatty acids distribution also hinted toward a contribution from bacteria in the terrace [7, 81]. This bacterial community in the Laguna Lejía terrace was presumably active at the time of collection according to in silico growth predictions of MAGs (average iRep values between 1.3 and 1.4 in samples A–D and F, and 2.4 in sample E) (Figs. 7 and 8). The replication index is calculated based on the DNA sequence coverage at the origin over the terminus of replication [46]. Therefore, iRep values greater than 1 indicate replication of genomes, and values greater than 2 may point out multiple replication forks. Certain bacterial MAGs have values close to 1 (e.g., 1.09 in sample C), suggesting slow replication rates. By contrast, the high iRep values in some of the MAGs, especially in sample E (i.e., up to 4.7 in E) (Fig. 8), may be explained by the relatively high concentration of key nutrients in this sediment layer, such as SO42--S or NO3--N, that may promote bacterial growth.

The possibility that a fraction of the microbial biomass (here measured as DNA and lipids) detected in the Lejía terrace was ancient may not be ruled out, as ancient samples tens to billion years old usually contain traces of DNA, proteins, and lipids of microbial origin [7]. Each biomolecule has different preservation rates over time, with that of lipids being the highest (billion years [74]) and DNA the lowest (~1 million year [82]). In addition, the good insulation of biomolecules from UV radiation and high temperatures, as it the case of the Laguna Lejía terrace, also plays a key role in the preservation of DNA and lipids [82].

Desiccation of the Laguna Lejía provided new ecological niche opportunities for microorganisms

The prokaryotic community composition of the Laguna Lejía terrace differed from that reported in the water and wet sediments of the lake in previous studies, suggesting that lake desiccation resulted into a new ecological niche for microorganisms adapted to drier conditions. The bacterial community of the wet sediments showed Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Spirochaeota, and Proteobacteria as the most abundant phyla [21, 22], while the dried terrace was dominated by Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexota, and the Candidate Phylum Patescibacteria (or CPR) (Fig. 4a). Although Actinobacteriota is a common phylum in aquatic and terrestrial habitats worldwide, its dominance in the terrace (23–40%) compared to the wet sediments (~2.5%) [22], and its common presence in soils and rocks of the Atacama Desert [83,84,85], supports a microbial community shift likely driven by extended periods of drought during water level fluctuations.

In contrast to Actinobacteriota, the high proportion of CPR bacteria found in the Lejía terrace (up to 15%) has not been reported in Atacama sediments or rocks, but detected in smaller relative abundances in Lomas Bayas, María Elena, and Yungay [6], and in the Salar de Llamara [86, 87]. The relatively high proportion of CPR, and the presence of Nanoarchaeota (DPANN superphylum) in the Laguna Lejía terrace suggested extensive microbial interactions, potentially even between bacterial and archaeal communities [88]. The CPR bacteria are a group of ultra-small, genome-reduced bacteria with host-associated lifestyles [89], either parasitic [90] or symbiotic [91], to meet their metabolic requirements [92]. Similarly, Nanoarchaeota are also small-size, genome-reduced archaea that are parasitic or symbiotic to other archaea [93, 94], for instance, of the Thermoproteota phylum [95], which is also present in the Laguna Lejía sediments.

The low relationship between the prokaryotic community structure and the geochemistry and mineralogy of sediment layers suggested that biological interactions (e.g., symbiosis and competition) or abiotic variables not measured here (e.g., moisture, temperature, redox potential, or physical structure of the sediment) could have played a decisive role on the microbial community structure of the Laguna Lejía terrace. Previous works on Atacama rocks showed that the physical structure better determined the microbial community composition and abundance than the chemistry of lithic substrates [83, 96]. There are, however, a few exceptions to the low relationship found here. Actinobacteriota, mainly represented in the Lejía terrace by the orders Gaiellales, Solirubrobacterales, and UBA5794, were positively correlated with the anorthoclase and anorthite feldspars (Table S5). To our knowledge, no previous studies have correlated Actinobacteriota with feldspars more than with other minerals. In fact, Gaiellales and Solirubrobacterales are widely distributed in extreme aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems with different substrates [97,98,99].

The geochemistry of the Laguna Lejía terrace exerted selective pressure on microbial communities able to metabolize CO, S, N, As, and halogenated compounds

The prokaryotic community of the Lejía terrace is adapted to the particular geochemistry of the lake and shows a wide metabolic potential involved in S and N biogeochemical cycles. The high relative abundance of predicted enzymes for assimilatory and dissimilatory sulfate reduction, as well as sulfur and thiosulfate oxidation in all sediment layers (Fig. 4b) is consistent with the high SO42--S concentrations along the terrace profile (5–20 mg · g-1 dw). For instance, the detection of sulfate adenylyltransferases (e.g., CysN) and sulfite reductases (e.g., CysJ) (Table S6) suggested that microorganisms had the potential to transform sulfate to sulfide as a previous step for the synthesis of Cys amino acids (assimilatory) [100]. In addition, the sulfate adenylyltransferase (Sat), adenylyl-sulfate reductases (AprA and AprB), and sulfite reductases (DrsA and DsrB) suggested the potential of the prokaryotic community to first reduce sulfate to sulfite and then reduce sulfite to hydrogen sulfide (dissimilatory) [101]. In addition to sulfur reduction, the prokaryotic community also had six sox genes (soxXYZABC) that encode for a complete thiosulfate-oxidizing enzyme system [102]. This sulfur oxidation may be coupled, but not necessarily, to nitrate reduction in the Lejía prokaryotic community, based on the prediction of nitrate reductases (e.g., NarG or NapA) [103]. In addition, the annotation of enzymes for nitrite reduction to ammonia (e.g., NrfA), denitrification (e.g., NirS, NirK, NorB, NosZ), and nitrification (AmoA, AmoB, AmoC, NxrA, and NxrB) [103, 104] suggested the potential of the prokaryotic community for a complete N cycle. This battery of nitrogen metabolisms possibly explains the bulk δ15N values from 1.6‰ to 6.1‰ in the sediments, as each nitrogen pathway is characterized by different levels of isotopic fractionations (ɛ), some higher (e.g., denitrification (ɛ = 28–33‰)) than others (e.g., ammonification (ɛ = 0–5‰)) [105].

The high relative abundance and wide distribution of predicted enzymes related to arsenic and halogenated compounds in the Lejía prokaryotic community (Fig. 4b) suggested that arsenic and halogenated compounds are important selective pressures for microorganisms. The annotation of enzymes involved in the arsenate (As(V)) reduction as a detoxification mechanism (e.g., ArsA, ArsB, ArsC, ArsH, Acr3) in all sediment layers (Table S6) is consistent with the detection of As in the Lejía terrace profile (2–7 µg · g-1 dw). ArsC is involved in the reduction of arsenate to arsenite (As(III)), which is then pumped out of the cell with the efflux pumps ArsB and Acr3 [106, 107]. Also, the prediction of arsenite oxidases (AoxA and AoxB) suggested the potential of Lejía prokaryotes to oxidate arsenite to arsenate. The potential to transform arsenate or arsenite either as a detoxification mechanism or energy gain has also been reported in other Andean environments [70, 107, 108]. Unlike previous studies, the As cycle was surprisingly the most abundant metabolism in the Lejía prokaryotic community, reaching up to 27% of the total predicted proteins in sample D. In addition, the annotation of several haloalkane and haloacetate dehalogenases (DehH and DhaA) in the samples suggested the ability of the Lejía prokaryotic community to transform halogenated compounds [109].

The coexistence of aerobic and anaerobic carbon fixation pathways by the Lejía prokaryotic community indicated a variety of microconditions in the terrace and suggested autotrophic metabolism diversification to optimize available resources. The most abundant autotrophic metabolism was the photosynthetic assimilation of CO2 through the CBB cycle, based on the relative abundance of predicted Rubisco enzymes (RbcL and RbcS) (Table S6) [110]. Besides Cyanobacteria, other bacteria present in the Lejía sediments, such as α-, β-, and γ-Proteobacteria [110], may explain the dominance of the CBB cycle. The bulk carbon isotopic composition of the six Lejía samples (δ13C from −17‰ to −22‰), slightly more enriched in 13C than reported so far (δ13C from −27‰ to −29‰) [17], also supports the relevance of the CBB in the terrace. However, the slightly less negative values compared to the theoretical ones for the CBB cycle (δ13C from −20‰ to −38‰) [111, 112] suggested the contribution of other autotrophic pathways. For instance, these δ13C values could also imply a contribution from the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle [113], but the absence of detection of any of the key genes associated with rTCA rules it out as a relevant CO2 fixation pathway in this environment. By contrast, the prediction of enzymes for the 3-HP/4-HB pathway (e.g., 3-hydroxypropionyl-CoA dehydratase) in the lake terrace may explain the relatively 13C-enriched bulk δ13C, as the 3-HP/4-HB pathway produces characteristic bulk δ13C values from −0.2‰ to −4‰ [114]. In addition, the autotrophic community of the Laguna Lejía terrace was also involved in the WL pathway based on the detection of key enzymes, e.g., anaerobic CO dehydrogenases [110].

Besides CO2 fixation, the high relative abundance of predicted CO dehydrogenases (CoxL, CoxM, and CoxS) in the Lejía prokaryotic community suggested aerobic CO oxidation as a determining trait for their survival in the organic carbon-depleted terrace. CO has been previously hypothesized to serve as a supplemental carbon and energy source in oligotrophic habitats [115]. The low TOC concentration in the Lejía terrace (0.1–1.2%) and the high relative abundance of predicted CO dehydrogenases form I (Figure S9) supported aerobic CO oxidation as a carbon and energy source in this organic carbon-depleted environment.

Novelty of genomes from the Laguna Lejía terrace and expansion of metabolic capabilities to unexpected microbial taxa

The 591 MAGs reconstructed from the prokaryotic community of the Laguna Lejía terrace (Fig. 5) provided information on the metabolic potentials of yet uncultivated microorganisms from Andean ecosystems. The identification of bacterial MAGs not assigned to any known class, order, or family, as well as the large proportion of bacterial and archaeal MAGs unclassified to the genus (64% and 16%, respectively) or species (99.7% and 74%, respectively) level (Fig. 6), revealed the novelty of the recovered MAGs and evidenced the large amount of microbial dark matter in the Laguna Lejía ecosystem. For instance, the percentage of species novelty of the Lejía prokaryotic MAGs was 98.8% (considering bacteria and archaea together) and was higher than the 83% found in the Arctic ocean, calculated with the same methodology as here [52]. The absence of genomes in the GTDB similar to those recovered from the Lejía terrace showed up the need for microbial isolations from extreme environments and highlights the potential of omics techniques to gain insights into the functional diversity of uncultured microorganisms, expanding our view of the limits of life on Earth and providing biotechnological opportunities [1, 84].

The most frequent and widespread metabolic potentials among the Lejía MAGs were those related to the S and N cycles, aerobic CO oxidation, and transformation of As, Cu, and halogenated compounds. The presence of many of these metabolic capabilities among phylogenetically distant bacteria (Fig. 7) suggested gene acquisition by horizontal gene transfer. For instance, the ubiquitous presence of arsenic genes in the Lejía MAGs (i.e., all phyla except Cyanobacteria) and the reported location of ars operon in transposons [116] suggested horizontal gene transfer as a mechanism to facilitate bacterial adaptation to the particular Laguna Lejía chemical environment that requires in-depth study. Similarly, copper resistance proteins (Cop and Cus) may also be associated with mobile elements [117], and genes for haloalkane dehalogensases (DehH or DhaA) [109] and nitrate reductases (Nap and Nar) [118, 119] can be localized on plasmids and thus transfer laterally.

The broad redox capacity for N and S compounds as well as varied CO2 fixation pathways in phylogenetically distant bacteria and archaea from Laguna Lejía extends metabolic capabilities to previously unknown phyla. The prediction of potential nitrite oxidoreductases in phylogenetically distinct bacteria beyond Nitrospirota, Nitrospinota, Nitrosediminicolota, Chloroflexota, and Proteobacteria [120,121,122] may extend the list of nitrite oxidizers known so far. As the KEGG database does not differentiate between nitrite oxidoreductases and nitrate reductases (e.g., K00370 and K00371), nitrite oxidation by these new phyla is to be considered with caution. Moreover, the prediction of ammonia monooxygenase (AmoC) in an unknown Actinobacteriota (class UBA4738, order AC-67) may expand the catalog of ammonia oxidizers, dominated in the Lejía samples by the archaeal family Nitrosopumilaceae (already described as ammonia oxidizers [123]) (Table S7). However, the sole presence of the amoC gene in the Actinobacteriota MAG does not ensure that ammonia oxidation occurs, as the rest of the amo gene cluster was missing (Figure S8).

While assimilatory sulfate reduction is frequent in all microorganisms, the dissimilatory pathway has only been described in Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (δ-Proteobacteria), Nitrospirae, and Euryarchaeota [124]. Therefore, the prediction of adenylylsulfate reductases in Bacteroidota and α- and γ-Proteobacteria in the Lejía MAGs may expand the list of dissimilatory sulfate reducers known so far. In addition, sulfur and thiosulfate oxidation was also widespread across MAGs, some belonging to already described phyla, such as Cyanobacteria or Proteobacteria (e.g., Rhodospirillales or Pseudomonadales; Table S7) [125, 126], but also to potentially new taxa, such as Methylomirabilota (Rokubacteriales). The annotation of phosphoribulokinases (prk) in one Planctomycetota (Phycisphaerales) and Gemmatimonadota (order SG8-23), and a ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) in a Nanoarchaeota (Pacearchaeales), may also extend the list of microorganisms fixing CO2 through the CBB cycle known so far [127]. Alternatively, the prediction of these enzymes could be associated with a metabolism different from CBB, as occurs in the reductive hexulose-phosphase pathway mediated by Rubisco and prk in methanogenic archaea [128].

The expansion of genetic diversity and potential metabolisms involved in the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur to unexpected microorganisms in the ancient sediments of the Laguna Lejía terrace contribute to our knowledge on the limits of life on Earth and on the habitability of similar present-day planetary settings. Our results demonstrate that bacterial and archaeal communities can thrive and adapt to changing environmental conditions over thousands—and perhaps millions—of years within a well-structured, slightly moist sediments. The microbial genetic and metabolic diversity in the terrace of the Laguna Lejía supports Martian craters that served as paleolake basins [129] as strategic landing sites for missions aimed at searching for signs of life, such the Mars 2020 mission, which landed in the Jezero crater delta to collect rock and regolith samples for possible return to Earth [130, 131].

Conclusions

The microbial, geochemical and mineralogical analyses of the Laguna Lejía terrace (1 m section of ca. 10.3 and 11 kyr BP) showed:

  1. i.

    A different structure of the prokaryotic community compared to that of the wet sediments reported in other studies, which suggests that lake desiccation provided a new ecological niche for microorganisms.

  2. ii.

    A different prokaryotic community structure, geochemistry, and mineralogy between sediment layers, suggesting large-scale water level fluctuations in the Laguna Lejía during the 700 years that comprises the terrace section.

  3. iii.

    Lipid biomarkers of aquatic/terrestrial plant remnants, as well as DNA from metabolically active microorganisms. The successful detection of biomarkers in the interior of the terrace supports Martian water basins (e.g., craters) as strategic landing sites for seeking traces of life.

  4. iv.

    A broad genetic and metabolic diversity of prokaryotic communities, capable of metabolizing CO, S, N, As, and halogenated compounds. This suggests that the particular geochemistry of the terrace (a saline, sulfur-rich, and organic carbon-depleted environment) exerted a selective pressure on the microbial communities.

  5. v.

    A high number of novel bacterial and archaeal MAGs (e.g., 98.8% belonged to currently undescribed species), as well as microbial taxa with hitherto undescribed metabolic capabilities. This represents a significant contribution to the expansion of microorganisms involved in the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur.

Availability of data and material

Raw DNA sequence reads and MAGs from the Laguna Lejía terrace were deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and GenBank, and are available under the BioProject ID PRJNA1076829. Accessions for the raw DNA sequence reads are SAMN39953875-SAMN39953880, and for the genomes are SAMN39963127-SAMN39963352, and SAMN39963371-SAMN39963735. Additional information on radiocarbon data, lipid biomarker results, statistical analyses, prediction of metabolic potentials of the prokaryotic community and MAGs, and all raw data and intermediate files from the phylogenomics analysis can be found in the supplementary material.

References

  1. Jiao J-Y, Liu L, Hua Z-S, Fang B-Z, Zhou E-M, Salam N, et al. Microbial dark matter coming to light: challenges and opportunities. Natl Sci Rev. 2021;8:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer K, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:635–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schultz J, Modolon F, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Shedding light on the composition of extreme microbial dark matter: alternative approaches for culturing extremophiles. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1167718.

  4. Lezcano MÁ, Moreno-Paz M, Carrizo D, Prieto-Ballesteros O, Fernández-Martínez MÁ, Sánchez-García L, et al. Biomarker profiling of microbial mats in the geothermal band of Cerro Caliente, Deception Island (Antarctica): life at the edge of heat and cold. Astrobiology. 2019;19:1490–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang Y, Schulze-Makuch D, Arens FL, Saenz JS, Adam PS, Sager C, et al. Leave no stone unturned: individually adapted xerotolerant Thaumarchaeota sheltered below the boulders of the Atacama Desert hyperarid core. Microbiome. 2021;9:234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulze-Makuch D, Wagner D, Kounaves SP, Mangelsdorf K, Devine KG, de Vera J-P, et al. Transitory microbial habitat in the hyperarid Atacama Desert. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:2670–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lezcano MÁ, Sánchez-García L, Quesada A, Carrizo D, Fernández-Martínez MÁ, Cavalcante-Silva E, et al. Comprehensive metabolic and taxonomic reconstruction of an ancient microbial mat from the McMurdo ice shelf (Antarctica) by integrating genetic, metaproteomic and lipid biomarker analyses. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:799360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sánchez-Andrea I, Rodríguez N, Amils R, Sanz JL. Microbial diversity in anaerobic sediments at Río Tinto, a naturally acidic environment with a high heavy metal content. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6085–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruneel O, Duran R, Casiot C, Elbaz-Poulichet F, Personné J-C. Diversity of Microorganisms in Fe-As-Rich acid mine drainage waters of Carnoulès, France. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:551–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones BE, Grant WD, Duckworth AW, Owenson GG. Microbial diversity of soda lakes. Extremophiles. 1998;2:191–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramos-Barbero MD, Viver T, Zabaleta A, Senel E, Gomariz M, Antigüedad I, et al. Ancient saltern metagenomics: tracking changes in microbes and their viruses from the underground to the surface. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:3477–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin S, Marín I, Gómez MJ, Morales EA, Zekker I, San Martín-Uriz P, et al. Prokaryotic diversity and community composition in the Salar de Uyuni, a large scale, chaotropic salt flat. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:3745–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Demirjian DC, Morı́s-Varas F, Cassidy CS. Enzymes from extremophiles. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2001;5:144-51.

  14. Cabrol NA, Grin EA, Chong G, Minkley E, Hock AN, Yu Y, et al. The high-lakes project. J Geophys Res Biogeosciences. 2009;114:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Risacher F, Alonso H, Salazar C. Geoquímica de aguas en cuencas cerradas: I, II, III Regiones - Chile. Tech. Open File Rep. S.I.T. 51. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Dirección General de Aguas, Santiago, Chile.; 1999.

  16. Geyh MA, Grosjean M, Núñez L, Schotterer U. Radiocarbon reservoir effect and the timing of the late-glacial/early holocene humid phase in the Atacama Desert (Northern Chile). Quat Res. 1999;52:143–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grosjean M, Geyh MA, Messerli B, Schotterer U. Late-glacial and early Holocene lake sediments, ground-water formation and climate in the Atacama Altiplano 22–24oS. J Paleolimnol. 1995;14:241–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grosjean M. Paleohydrology of the Laguna Lejía (north Chilean Altiplano) and climatic implications for late-glacial times. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1994;109:89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaete A, Walter TR, Bredemeyer S, Zimmer M, Kujawa C, Franco Marin L, et al. Processes culminating in the 2015 phreatic explosion at Lascar volcano, Chile, evidenced by multiparametric data. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2020;20:377–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wordsworth RD. The climate of early Mars. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2016;44:381–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demergasso C, Dorador C, Meneses D, Blamey J, Cabrol N, Escudero L, et al. Prokaryotic diversity pattern in high-altitude ecosystems of the Chilean Altiplano. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2010;115:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandakovic D, Maldonado J, Pulgar R, Cabrera P, Gaete A, Urtuvia V, et al. Microbiome analysis and bacterial isolation from Lejía Lake soil in Atacama Desert. Extremophiles. 2018;22:665–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Runzheimer K, Lozano C, Boy D, Boy J, Godoy R, Matus FJ, et al. Exploring Andean high-altitude lake extremophiles through advanced proteotyping. J Proteome Res. 2024;23:891–904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amend AS, Martiny AC, Allison SD, Berlemont R, Goulden ML, Lu Y, et al. Microbial response to simulated global change is phylogenetically conserved and linked with functional potential. ISME J. 2016;10:109–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Koskella B, Vos M. Adaptation in natural microbial populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2015;46:503–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chase AB, Weihe C, Martiny JBH. Adaptive differentiation and rapid evolution of a soil bacterium along a climate gradient. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2101254118.

  27. Ramsey CB. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon. 2009;51:337–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reimer PJ, Austin WEN, Bard E, Bayliss A, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon. 2020;62:725–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 3052. Microwave Assisted Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices. In: U.S. EPA, Ed., Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA SW-846, Third Edition, Chap. 3 (Inorganic Analytes). Washington DC: U.S. EPA; 1996.

  30. Révész K, Qi H, Coplen TB. Determination of the δ15N and δ13C of total nitrogen and carbon in solids, RSIL Lab Code 1832, chap. 5. In: Révész K, Coplen TB, editors. Methods Rest Stable Isot Lab (slightly Revis from version 11 released 2007). U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. Book 10; 2012. p. 31. https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/tm10c5/tm10c5.pdf.

  31. Carrizo D, Sánchez-García L, Menes RJ, García-Rodríguez F. Discriminating sources and preservation of organic matter in surface sediments from five Antarctic lakes in the Fildes Peninsula (King George Island) by lipid biomarkers and compound-specific isotopic analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2019;672:657–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sánchez-García L, Fernández-Martínez MA, Moreno-Paz M, Carrizo D, García-Villadangos M, Manchado JM, et al. Simulating Mars drilling mission for searching for life: ground-truthing lipids and other complex microbial biomarkers in the iron-sulfur rich Río Tinto analog. Astrobiology. 2020;20:1029–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hyatt D, Chen G, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzek BE, Huang H, McGarvey P, Mazumder R, Wu CH. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1282–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Brown CT, Hug LA, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Castelle CJ, Singh A, et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature. 2015;523:208–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dick GJ, Andersson AF, Baker BJ, Simmons SL, Thomas BC, Yelton AP, et al. Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:605–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:836–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bornemann TLV, Esser SP, Stach TL, Burg T, Probst AJ. <scp>uBin:</scp> A manual refining tool for genomes from metagenomes. Environ Microbiol. 2023;25:1077–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Singh A, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Sharon I, et al. Genomic resolution of a cold subsurface aquifer community provides metabolic insights for novel microbes adapted to high CO 2 concentrations. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:459–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep : a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown CT, Olm MR, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1256–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2251–2 (Valencia A, editor).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1925–7 (Hancock J, editor).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1079–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Royo-Llonch M, Sánchez P, Ruiz-González C, Salazar G, Pedrós-Alió C, Sebastián M, et al. Compendium of 530 metagenome-assembled bacterial and archaeal genomes from the polar Arctic Ocean. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:1561–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Larralde M. Pyrodigal: Python bindings and interface to Prodigal, an efficient method for gene prediction in prokaryotes. J Open Source Softw. 2022;7:4296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen FA, Bik HM, Eisen JA. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S. BMGE (block mapping and gathering with entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–4 (Teeling E, editor).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14:587–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang H-C, Minh BQ, Susko E, Roger AJ. Modeling site heterogeneity with posterior mean site frequency profiles accelerates accurate phylogenomic estimation. Syst Biol. 2018;67:216–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:518–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. http://www.r-project.org/

  65. Kassambara A. rstatix: pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests. 2023. p. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rs.

  66. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-7. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.

  67. Philippsen B. The freshwater reservoir effect in radiocarbon dating. Herit Sci. 2013;1:24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Geyh MA, Schotterer U, Grosjean M. Temporal changes of the 14 C reservoir effect in lakes. Radiocarbon. 1998;40:921–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Tassi F, Aguilera F, Vaselli O, Medina E, Tedesco D, Delgado Huertas A, et al. The magmatic- and hydrothermal-dominated fumarolic system at the Active Crater of Lascar volcano, northern Chile. Bull Volcanol. 2009;71:171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kurth D, Amadio A, Ordoñez OF, Albarracín VH, Gärtner W, Farías ME. Arsenic metabolism in high altitude modern stromatolites revealed by metagenomic analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Saona Acuña LA, Soria MN, Villafañe PG, Stepanenko T, Farías ME. Arsenic and its biological role: from early earth to current andean microbial ecosystems. Microb Ecosyst Cent Andes Extrem Environ. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 275–84.

  72. Álvarez-Amado F, Rosales M, Godfrey L, Poblete-González C, Morgado E, Espinoza M, et al. The role of ignimbrites and fine sediments in the lithium distribution and isotopic fractionation in hyperarid environments: Insights from Li-isotopes in the Atacama Desert. J Geochemical Explor. 2022;241:107062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Brocks JJ, Summons RE. Sedimentary hydrocarbons, biomarkers for early life. Treatise on Geochemistry. Elsevier; 2003. p. 63–115.

  74. Vinnichenko G, Jarrett AJM, Hope JM, Brocks JJ. Discovery of the oldest known biomarkers provides evidence for phototrophic bacteria in the 1.73 Ga Wollogorang Formation Australia. Geobiology. 2020;18:544–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Brocks JJ, Pearson A. Building the biomarker tree of life. Rev Mineral Geochem. 2005;59:233–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sánchez-García L, Carrizo D, Lezcano MÁ, Moreno-Paz M, Aeppli C, García-Villadangos M, et al. Time-integrative multibiomarker detection in triassic–jurassic rocks from the Atacama Desert: Relevance to the Search for Basic Life Beyond Earth. Astrobiology. 2021;21:1421–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ficken K, Li B, Swain D, Eglinton G. An n-alkane proxy for the sedimentary input of submerged/floating freshwater aquatic macrophytes. Org Geochem. 2000;31:745–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Eglinton G, Hamilton RJ. Leaf epicuticular waxes. Science (80- ). 1967;156:1322–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Goad LJ, Akihisa T. Analysis of Sterols. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  80. Muñoz-Pedreros A, Hauenstein E, Faúndez L, Möller P. Flora and vegetation of Lejía lagoon, a desert ecosystem of the high Puna in northern Chile. Idesia (Arica). 2018;36:0–0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Megevand V, Carrizo D, Lezcano MÁ, Moreno-Paz M, Cabrol NA, Parro V, et al. Lipid profiles from fresh biofilms along a temperature gradient on a hydrothermal stream at El Tatio (Chilean Andes), as a proxy for the interpretation of past and present biomarkers beyond Earth. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:811904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Willerslev E, Cooper A. Ancient DNA. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2005;272:3–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Meslier V, Casero MC, Dailey M, Wierzchos J, Ascaso C, Artieda O, et al. Fundamental drivers for endolithic microbial community assemblies in the hyperarid Atacama Desert. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:1765–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Idris H, Goodfellow M, Sanderson R, Asenjo JA, Bull AT. Actinobacterial rare biospheres and dark matter revealed in habitats of the Chilean Atacama Desert. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Sánchez-García L, Lezcano MÁ, Carrizo D, Severino R, García-Villadangos M, Cady SL, et al. Assessing siliceous sinter matrices for long-term preservation of lipid biomarkers in opaline sinter deposits analogous to Mars in El Tatio (Chile). Sci Total Environ. 2023;870:161765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Finstad KM, Probst AJ, Thomas BC, Andersen GL, Demergasso C, Echeverría A, et al. Microbial community structure and the persistence of cyanobacterial populations in salt crusts of the hyperarid Atacama Desert from genome-resolved metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rasuk MC, Contreras Leiva M, Kurth D, Farías ME. Complete characterization of stratified ecosystems of the Salar de Llamara (Atacama Desert). Microb Ecosyst Cent Andes Extrem Environ. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 153–64.

  88. Kuroda K, Yamamoto K, Nakai R, Hirakata Y, Kubota K, Nobu MK, et al. Symbiosis between Candidatus Patescibacteria and Archaea Discovered in wastewater-treating bioreactors. mBio. 2022;13:e01711–22.

  89. Chaudhari NM, Overholt WA, Figueroa-Gonzalez PA, Taubert M, Bornemann TLV, Probst AJ, et al. The economical lifestyle of CPR bacteria in groundwater allows little preference for environmental drivers. Environ Microbiome. 2021;16:24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Moreira D, Zivanovic Y, López-Archilla AI, Iniesto M, López-García P. Reductive evolution and unique predatory mode in the CPR bacterium Vampirococcus lugosii. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Nelson WC, Stegen JC. The reduced genomes of Parcubacteria (OD1) contain signatures of a symbiotic lifestyle. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Luef B, Frischkorn KR, Wrighton KC, Holman HYN, Birarda G, Thomas BC, et al. Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Castelle CJ, Banfield JF. Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell. 2018;172:1181–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Adam PS, Bornemann TLV, Probst AJ. Progress and challenges in studying the ecophysiology of Archaea. In: Ferreira-Cerca S, editor. Archaea Methods Mol Biol. Humana: New York; 2022. p. 469–86.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Munson-McGee JH, Field EK, Bateson M, Rooney C, Stepanauskas R, Young MJ. Nanoarchaeota, their sulfolobales host, and Nanoarchaeota virus distribution across Yellowstone National Park Hot Springs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:7860–8 (Wommack KE, editor).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Casero MC, Meslier V, DiRuggiero J, Quesada A, Ascaso C, Artieda O, et al. The composition of endolithic communities in gypcrete is determined by the specific microhabitat architecture. Biogeosciences. 2021;18:993–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Crits-Christoph A, Robinson CK, Barnum T, Fricke WF, Davila AF, Jedynak B, et al. Colonization patterns of soil microbial communities in the Atacama Desert. Microbiome. 2013;1:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Casero MC, Meslier V, Wierzchos J, DiRuggiero J. Preandean Atacama Desert endolithic microbiology. In: Farías ME, editor. Microb Ecosyst Cent Andes Extrem Environ. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Chen R-W, He Y-Q, Cui L-Q, Li C, Shi S-B, Long L-J, et al. Diversity and distribution of uncultured and cultured Gaiellales and Rubrobacterales in South China Sea Sediments. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wu B, Liu F, Fang W, Yang T, Chen G-H, He Z, et al. Microbial sulfur metabolism and environmental implications. Sci Total Environ. 2021;778:146085.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Anantharaman K, Hausmann B, Jungbluth SP, Kantor RS, Lavy A, Warren LA, et al. Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle. ISME J. 2018;12:1715–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Dahl C, Friedrich CG. Microbial Sulfur Metabolism. Dahl C, Friedrich CG, editors. Microb. Sulfur Metab. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008.

  103. Smith CJ, Nedwell DB, Dong LF, Osborn AM. Diversity and abundance of nitrate reductase genes ( narG and napA ), nitrite reductase genes (nirS and nrfA), and their transcripts in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3612–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Levy-Booth DJ, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ. Microbial functional genes involved in nitrogen fixation, nitrification and denitrification in forest ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;75:11–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Robinson D. δ15N as an integrator of the nitrogen cycle. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Amend JP, Saltikov C, Lu G-S, Hernandez J. Microbial arsenic metabolism and reaction energetics. Rev Mineral Geochemistry. 2014;79:391–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Ordoñez OF, Lanzarotti E, Kurth D, Cortez N, Farías ME, Turjanski AG. Genome comparison of two Exiguobacterium strains from high altitude andean lakes with different arsenic resistance: identification and 3D modeling of the Acr3 efflux pump. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Saona LA, Valenzuela-Diaz S, Kurth D, Contreras M, Meneses C, Castro-Nallar E, et al. Analysis of co-regulated abundance of genes associated with arsenic and phosphate metabolism in Andean Microbial Ecosystems. bioRxiv. 2019;870428. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/870428v1.article-metrics.

  109. Janssen DB, Pries F, van der Ploeg JR. Genetics and biochemistry of dehalogenating enzymes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:163–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Hügler M, Sievert SM. Beyond the calvin cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the ocean. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2011;3:261–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Hayes JM. Fractionation of carbon and hydrogen isotopes in biosynthetic processes. Rev Mineral Geochem. 2001;43:225–77 Valley JW, Cole DR, editors.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Quandt L, Gottschalk G, Ziegler H, Stichler W. Isotope discrimination by photosynthetic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1977;1:125–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Preuß A, Schauder R, Fuchs G, Stichler W. Carbon isotope fractionation by autotrophic bacteria with three different CO2 fixation pathways. Zeitschrift für Naturforsch C. 1989;44:397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Berg IA, Kockelkorn D, Ramos-Vera WH, Say RF, Zarzycki J, Hügler M, et al. Autotrophic carbon fixation in archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:447–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, et al. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature. 2017;552:400–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Andres J, Bertin PN. The microbial genomics of arsenic. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:299–322 (Danchin A, editor).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Richard D, Ravigné V, Rieux A, Facon B, Boyer C, Boyer K, et al. Adaptation of genetically monomorphic bacteria: evolution of copper resistance through multiple horizontal gene transfers of complex and versatile mobile genetic elements. Mol Ecol. 2017;26:2131–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Moreno-Vivián C, Cabello P, Martínez-Luque M, Blasco R, Castillo F. Prokaryotic nitrate reduction: molecular properties and functional distinction among bacterial nitrate reductases. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:6573–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Stolz JF, Basu P. Evolution of nitrate reductase: molecular and structural variations on a common function. ChemBioChem. 2002;3:198–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Sorokin DY, Lücker S, Vejmelkova D, Kostrikina NA, Kleerebezem R, Rijpstra WIC, et al. Nitrification expanded: discovery, physiology and genomics of a nitrite-oxidizing bacterium from the phylum Chloroflexi. ISME J. 2012;6:2245–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Lücker S, Nowka B, Rattei T, Spieck E, Daims H. The genome of Nitrospina gracilis illuminates the metabolism and evolution of the major marine nitrite oxidizer. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Zhao R, Jørgensen SL, Babbin AR. An abundant bacterial phylum with nitrite-oxidizing potential in oligotrophic marine sediments. Commun Biol. 2024;7:449.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Stahl DA, de la Torre JR. Physiology and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing Archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:83–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Thauer RK, Stackebrandt E, Hamilton WA. Energy metabolism and phylogenetic diversity of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Sulphate-Reducing Bact. 2007: 1–38.Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/sulphatereducing-bacteria/energy-metabolism-andphylogenetic-diversity-of-sulphatereducing-bacteria/A6181548479EB4BE0C8CEFCAFE9808A8.

  125. Friedrich CG. Physiology and genetics of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 1998;39:235–89.

  126. Friedrich CG, Rother D, Bardischewsky F, Quentmeier A, Fischer J. Oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by bacteria: emergence of a common mechanism? Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2873–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Garritano AN, Song W, Thomas T. Carbon fixation pathways across the bacterial and archaeal tree of life. PNAS Nexus. 2022;1:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Kono T, Mehrotra S, Endo C, Kizu N, Matusda M, Kimura H, et al. A RuBisCO-mediated carbon metabolic pathway in methanogenic archaea. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Carr MH. The fluvial history of Mars. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2012;370:2193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Tait KT, McCubbin FM, Smith CL, Agee CB, Busemann H, Cavalazzi B, et al. Preliminary planning for Mars sample return (MSR) curation activities in a sample receiving facility (SRF). Astrobiology. 2022;22:S-57-S-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Scheller EL, Razzell Hollis J, Cardarelli EL, Steele A, Beegle LW, Bhartia R, et al. Aqueous alteration processes in Jezero crater, Mars—implications for organic geochemistry. Science (80-). 2022;378:1105–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Miriam García-Villadangos, María Teresa Fernández Sampedro and María Paz Martín Redondo for technical assistance in Ion Chromatography, X-ray diffraction and ICP-MS analyses, respectively.

Funding

This research has been funded by grants no. RTI2018-094368-B-I00 and PID2021-126746NB-I00 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation/State Agency of Research MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF “A way of making Europe”, and NASA Astrobiology Institute NAI-CAN7 project No. 13NAI7_2-0018. MAL was supported by a “Juan de la Cierva” postdoctoral grant no. FJC2018-037246-I, and by a postdoctoral grant from the European Union Youth Employment Initiative PEJD-2017-POST/TIC-4119, funded by AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 and ESF “Investing in your future”. LS-G and DC were supported by a “Ramón y Cajal” grants RYC2018-023943-I and RYC-2014-19446, respectively, funded by MCIN/AEI/https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033. AJP acknowledges funding by the Ministerium für Kultur und Wissenschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (Nachwuchsgruppe “Dr. Alexander Probst”), the German Research Foundation under project NOVAC (grant no. DFG PR1603/2-1), and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the project ‘MultiKulti’ (BMBF funding code: 161L0285E). PSA was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAL and VP conceptualized and designed the study. LS-G and VP collected the samples. NC funded and coordinated the field campaign. MAL extracted the DNA, analysed metagenomic data, and conducted statistical analyses with contribution from TB, SPE and AJP. PA performed phylogenomic analyses with contribution from TB and SE. AJP provided computational resources and metagenomic workflows. DC extracted lipids and analysed them together with LS-G. MAL coordinated data, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript and accepted the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Ángeles Lezcano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lezcano, M.Á., Bornemann, T.L.V., Sánchez-García, L. et al. Hyperexpansion of genetic diversity and metabolic capacity of extremophilic bacteria and archaea in ancient Andean lake sediments. Microbiome 12, 176 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01878-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-024-01878-x

Keywords