Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of methods for comparison

From: NEMoE: a nutrition aware regularized mixture of experts model to identify heterogeneous diet-microbiome-host health interactions

Method

Input data of identified subcohort

Input data of modeling within each subcohort

Model

sLR

 

Microbiome

Sparse logistic regression

SVM

 

Microbiome

Support vector machine

RF

 

Microbiome

Random forest

sLR Ka

Nutrition

Microbiome

Two-stage sLR with K latent class

SVM II

Nutrition

Microbiome

Two-stage SVM

RF II

Nutrition

Microbiome

Two-stage RF

NEMoE Kb

Nutrition

Microbiome

NEMoE with K latent class

MMMoEc

Microbiome

Microbiome

RMoE

NNMoE

Nutrition

Nutrition

RMoE

MNMoE

Microbiome

Nutrition

RMoE

Comb-MoE

Microbiome+nutrition

Microbiome+nutrition

RMoE

  1. aTwo stage sparse logistic regression fitted with two, three four latent classes were denoted as sLR II, sLR III, and sLR IV
  2. bNEMoE fitted with two, three four latent classes were denoted as NEMoE II, NEMoE III, and NEMoE IV. When not explicitly including the number of latent classes, we refer to NEMoE II
  3. cOur NEMoE is easy to extend to partition the population with different types of data. We also investigate the different types of data as input of the NEMoE model. Results showed using nutrition to split the population obtained the best performance in our dataset