Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the main genomic characteristics of the nine Wolbachia strains from supergroup F

From: Supergroup F Wolbachia with extremely reduced genome: transition to obligate insect symbionts

Strain

Host

Genome size

Proteins/hypothetical

%GC

BUSCO

Rickettsiales/Proteobacteria

Transposases

Phage-related

phaster/RAST

Mobile elements

Ankyrin repeats

Intergenic max

Intergenic average

Pseudogenesa

Coding density

wMeur1

Menacanthus eurysternus

733,850

592/72

28

85.7/68.5

0

0/0

0

0

2095

370

17

76

wMmer

Meromenopon meropis

1 005,754

734/142

29

91.8/73.5

0

0/0

0

1

3771

680

32

66

wMeur2

Menacanthus eurysternus

1 015,603

1 032/306

36

98.6/83.1

1

0/9

6

9

2055

171

85

84

wPaur

Penenirmus auritus

1 198,730

1 202/395

36

97.0/82.2

3

19/23

13

19

2247

208

144

82

wAlce

Alcedoecus sp.

1 479,761

1 506/470

36

97.3/79.9

8

88/17

21

9

2355

183

145

80

wMelo

Melophagus ovinus

1 656,288

1 639/520

36

98.6/82.7

4

21/78

21

30

2483

169

137

78

wCle

Cimex lectularius

1 250,060

1 454/595

36

97.8/82.2

0

56/14

68

26

1522

239

459

81

wOc

Osmia caerulescens

1 232,261

1 239/424

36

98.7/83.5

1

16/37

12

19

1907

172

167

83

wMhi

Madathamugadia hiepei

1 025,329

1 081/372

36

93.1/78.6

1

0/5

23

8

2450

207

149

79

  1. aComplete list of pseudogenes is provided in Supplementary data 5. The genomes assembled in this study are printed in bold. Coding density was calculated as a percentage proportion of coding bases (excluding pseudogenes) in respect to the total length of the genome