Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the digestive liquids. The data show a mean from three replicates with ± SD, for each the analyses were performed in duplicate. Tukey’s HSD test was applied after ANOVA variance analysis to compare statistical significance; for detailed comparisons see Additional file 4

From: Dynamics of dark fermentation microbial communities in the light of lactate and butyrate production

Experiment

Collection day

pH

Acetic acid

Lactic acid

Propionic acid

Butyric acid

Ethanol

g/L

Experiment M

3

4.0 ± 0.0

0.8 ± 0,2

2.6 ± 0.4 a

0.4 ± 0.1

0.3 ± 0.5

5.5 ± 1.9

6

3.9 ± 0.1 #

0.8 ± 0,1

3.9 ± 0.4 b

0.5 ± 0.1

1.0 ± 0.1 $

5.6 ± 1.5 @

9

3.7 ± 0.1 ##

1.0 ± 0.2

5.2 ± 0.3 a

0.4 ± 0.1

0.9 ± 0.6 $$

3.8 ± 2.1 @@

12

3.6 ± 0,03

1.2 ± 0.3

6.3 ± 0.7 a, b

0.5 ± 0.1

0.5 ± 0.3

3.1 ± 0.6

15

3.7 ± 0.03

1.0 ± 0.2

5.2 ± 0.7 a

0.3 ± 0.03

0.4 ± 0.2

4.1 ± 0.4

18

3.6 ± 0.03

1.0 ± 0.1

5.6 ± 0.2 a, b

0.5 ± 0.1

0.4 ± 0.2

4.9 ± 0.5

Experiment ML

3

4.4 ± 0.01

1.0 ± 0.2

10.4 ± 1.5

0.5 ± 0.1

0.03 ± 0.01 d

6.7 ± 1.1 e

6

4.4 ± 0.2 #

0.7 ± 0.4

12.0 ± 2.1 c, &

0.6 ± 0.1

1.1 ± 1.7 $

5.2 ± 0.7 @

9

4.5 ± 0.1 ##

0.8 ± 0.1

10.0 ± 0.5 &&

0.5 ± 0.1

1.1 ± 1.0 $$

3.4 ± 1.1 e, @@

12

4.5 ± 0.03

0.7 ± 0.2

8.3 ± 2.5

0.7 ± 0.1

1.9 ± 0.6

4.2 ± 1.5

15

4.6 ± 0.04

0.7 ± 0.2

6.3 ± 0.6 c

0.6 ± 0.1

3.2 ± 0.8 d

2.7 ± 0.6 e

18

4.6 ± 0.04

1.1 ± 0.3

6.8 ± 1.2 c

0.7 ± 0.1

3.2 ± 0.7 d

2.8 ± 1.1 e

Experiment MLA

3

4.6 ± 0.01 f

3.8 ± 0.4

11.2 ± 0.9

0.5 ± 0.1

0.2 ± 0.03 g

5.9 ± 0.6 h

6

5.4 ± 0.1 f , #

1.4 ± 0.1

2.5 ± 0.8 &

0.6 ± 0.01

7.1 ± 0.5 g, $

0.6 ± 0.04 h, @

9

5.5 ± 0.01 f, ##

2.7 ± 1.4

4.4 ± 6.5 &&

0.6 ± 0.02

6.5 ± 3.5 g, $$

0.9 ± 0.7 h, @@

12

4.7 ± 0.2

3.1 ± 0.9

5.2 ± 1.8

0.6 ± 0.1

4.5 ± 0.9

1.8 ± 0.8 h

15

5.1 ± 0.1

1.4 ± 0.6

2.9 ± 2.3

0.4 ± 0.1

5.2 ± 1.6

0.6 ± 0.1 h

18

4.6 ± 0.03

6.3 ± 1.8

8.8 ± 2.2

0.5 ± 0.1

2.2 ± 0.4

1.0 ± 0.1 h

Experiment LA

3

6.6 ± 0.1

2.1 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.2 i

0.1 ± 0.04

1.5 ± 0.7 j

0.1 ± 0.03

6

7.0 ± 0.1 #

1.7 ± 0.5

0.2 ± 0.2 I, &

0.2 ± 0.1

3.5 ± 0.8 j, $

0.1 ± 0.1 @

9

7.2 ± 0.1 ##

1.7 ± 0.1

0.02 ± 0.01 I, &&

0.2 ± 0.1

4.2 ± 0.2 j, $$

0.04 ± 0.04 @@

12

7.2 ± 0.05

1.1 ± 0.4

0.5 ± 0.3 i

0.3 ± 0.1

3.8 ± 0.7 j

0.2 ± 0.03

15

7.3 ± 0.03

2.1 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.2 i

0.2 ± 0.0

4.0 ± 0.1 j

0.1 ± 0.04

18

7.3 ± 0.1

1.7 ± 1.0

0.2 ± 0.15 i

0.4 ± 0.04

3.8 ± 0.5 j

0.1 ± 0.03

Experiment SLA

3

4.6 ± 0.03 k

3.4 ± 0.1

10.4 ± 0.7

0.02 ±0.01

0.9 ± 0.2 l

5.8 ± 1.0 m

6

6.2 ± 0.04 k, #

0.3 ± 0.1

0. 7 ± 1.1 &

0.4 ± 0.2

7.0 ± 1.3 l, $

1.1 ± 0.2 m, @

9

5.8 ±0.03 k, ##

2.2 ± 0.7

0.02 ± 0.01 &&

0.5 ± 0.2

8.0 ± 0.6 l, $$

0.4 ± 0.1 m, @@

12

4.7 ± 0.5

3.7 ± 0.7

4.4 ± 3.9

0.2 ± 0.1

4.4 ± 3.6

0.7 ± 0.1 m

15

4.8 ± 0.5

3.1 ± 2.1

6.7 ± 6.9

0.3 ± 0.2

4.7 ± 3.2

0.8 ± 0.8 m

18

5.1 ± 0.6

4.7 ± 2.5

5.9 ± 5.1

0.3 ± 0.1

5.4 ± 4.1

0.3 ± 0.1 m

  1. Results of the Tukey’s HSD test:
  2. a day 3 vs day 9, p = 0.0005; day 3 vs day 12, p = 0.0002; day 3 vs day 15, p = 0,0005; day 3 vs day 18, p = 0,0003
  3. b day 6 vs day 12, p = 0.0009; day 6 vs day 18, p = 0.02
  4. c day 6 vs day 15, p = 0,01; day 6 vs day 18, p = 0,02
  5. d day 3 vs day 15, p = 0.01; day3 vs day 18, p = 0.01
  6. e day 3 vs day 9, p = 0.02; day 3 vs day 15 p = 0.006; day 3 vs day 18, p = 0.007
  7. f day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.0002; day vs day 9, p = 0.0002
  8. g day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.002; day vs day 9, p = 0.004
  9. h day 3 vs days 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, p = 0.0002
  10. i day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.0002; day 3 vs day 9, p = 0.0002; day 3 vs day 12, p = 0.0002; day 3 vs day 15, p = 00002; day 3 vs day 18, p = 0.0002
  11. j day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.009; day 3 vs day 9, p = 0.001; day 3 vs day 12, p = 0.003; day 3 vs day 15, p = 0.002; day 3 vs day 18, p = 0.003
  12. k day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.002; day vs day 9, p = 0.02
  13. l day 3 vs day 6, p = 0.0004; day vs day 9, p = 0.0003
  14. m day 3 vs days 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18, p = 0.0002
  15. # pH after 6 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 2/ML, p = 0.001; Exp. 1/M vs Exp 3/MLA, 4/LA, 6/SLA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/MLA, Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 3/MLA vs Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 4/LA vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0002
  16. ## pH after 9 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 2/ML, Exp 3/MLA, 4/LA, 6/SLA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/MLA, Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 3/MLA vs Exp. 4/LA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 3/MLA vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0008; Exp. 4/LA vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0002
  17. $ butyrate concentration after 6 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 3/MLA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0004; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/MLA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0004; Exp. 3/MLA vs Exp. 4/LA, p = 0.01; Exp. 4/LA vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.01
  18. $$ butyrate concentration after 9 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 3/MLA, p = 0.01; Exp. 1/ML vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.003; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/MLA, p = 0.02; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.003
  19. & lactate concentration after 6 days: Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/SLA, Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0003
  20. && lactate concentration after 9 days: Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.03
  21. @ ethanol concentration after 6 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 3/MLA, Exp. 4/LA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0003; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 3/MLA, p = 0.0003; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 4/LA, p = 0.0002; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.0005
  22. @@ ethanol concentration after 9 days: Exp. 1/M vs Exp. 4/LA, Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.02; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 4/LA, p = 0.03; Exp. 2/ML vs Exp. 6/SLA, p = 0.05