Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics of the whole cohort at baseline sample collection (n=109) according to obesity status

From: The association between obesity and weight loss after bariatric surgery on the vaginal microbiota

Characteristics

Non-obese (n=67)

Obese (n=42)

Total (n=109)

p valuea

Age (years)

   

0.083

 Mean (SD, range)

44 (11.79, 20-75)

46 (11.26, 28-72)

44 (11.79, 20-75)

 

Ethnicity, n/N (%)

   

0.024

 Caucasian

48/67 (71.6)

22/42 (52.4)

70/109 (64.2)

 

 Asian

3/67 (4.5)

5/42 (11.9)

8/109 (7.3)

 

 Black

12/67 (17.9)

15/42 (35.7)

27/109 (24.8)

 

 Other

4/67 (6.0)

0/42 (0)

4/109 (3.7)

 

Parity, n/N (%)

   

<0.001

 Nulliparous

44/67 (65.7)

7/42 (16.7)

51/109 (46.8)

 

 Parous

23/67 (34.3)

35/42 (83.3)

58/109 (53.2)

 

Smoking status, n/N (%)

   

0.128

 Current smoker

11/67 (16.4)

2/42 (4.8)

13/109 (11.9)

 

 Non-smoker

56/67 (83.6)

40/42 (95.2)

96/109 (88.1)

 

HVS results n/N (%)

   

0.062

 Normal

46/67 (68.7)

36/42 (85.7)

82/109 (75.2)

 

 Abnormal

15/67 (22.4)

6/42 (14.3)

21/109 (19.3)

 

 Unknown

6/67 (8.9)

0/42 (0)

6/109 (5.5)

 

Abnormal HVS results, n/N (%)

   

0.076

 Bacterial vaginosis

3/15 (20.0)

1/6 (16.7)

4/21 (19.0)

 

 E. coli

1/15 (6.7)

0/6 (0)

1/21 (4.8)

 

 S. aureus

1/15 (6.7)

0/6 (0)

1/21 (4.8)

 

 Group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae)

2/15 (13.3)

3/6 (50.0)

5/21 (23.8)

 

 Yeast

0/15 (0)

1/6 (16.7)

1/21 (4.8)

 

 Mixed coliforms

0/15 (0)

1/6 (16.6)

1/21 (4.8)

 

 Unknown

8/15 (53.3)

0/6 (0)

8/21 (38.0)

 

Menopause status, n/N (%)

   

0.233

 Premenopausal

50/67 (74.6)

26/42 (61.9)

76/109 (70.0)

 

 Postmenopausal

17/67 (25.4)

16/42 (38.1)

33/109 (30.0)

 

Phase of menstrual cycle (PrMP), n/N (%)

  

0.115

 Luteal

24/50 (48.0)

7/26 (26.9)

31/76 (40.8)

 

 Follicular

15/50 (30.0)

8/26 (30.8)

23/76 (30.3)

 

 Ovulation

0/50 (0)

1/26 (3.8)

1/76 (1.3)

 

 Unknown

11/50 (22.0)

10/26 (38.5)

21/76 (27.6)

 

Use of contraception (PrMP), n/N (%)

   

0.016

 Nil

27/50 (54.0)

20/26 (77.0)

47/76 (61.9)

 

 Condoms

5/50 (10.0)

0/26 (0)

5/76 (6.6)

 

 COCP

12/50 (24.0)

1/26 (3.8)

13/76 (17.1)

 

 POP

1/50 (2.0)

0/26 (0)

1/76 (1.3)

 

 Copper IUD

0/50 (0)

0/26 (0)

0/76 (0)

 

 Mirena IUS

3/50 (6.0)

5/26 (19.2)

8/76 (10.5)

 

 Vaginal ring

0/50 (0)

0/26 (0)

0/76 (0)

 

 Contraceptive implant

2/50 (4.0)

0/26 (0)

2/76 (2.6)

 

 Contraceptive injection

0/50 (0)

0/26 (0)

0/76 (0)

 

Use of HRT (PoMP), n/N (%)

   

0.175

 Yes

5/17 (29.4)

1/16 (6.2)

6/33 (18.2)

 

 No

12/17 (70.6)

15/16 (93.8)

27/33 (81.8)

 

Diabetes status, n/N (%)

   

0.001

 Non-diabetic

65/67 (97.0)

32/42 (76.2)

97/109 (89.0)

 

 Diabetic

2/67 (3.0)

10/42 (23.8)

12/109 (11.0)

 

Diabetic treatment, n/N (%)

   

0.212

 Diet control only

1/2 (50.0)

3/10 (30.0)

4/12 (33.3)

 

 Metformin alone

0/2 (0)

3/10 (30.0)

3/12 (25.0)

 

 Metformin combined 2nd diabetic medication

0/2 (0)

0/10 (0)

0/12 (0)

 

 Other oral antiglycaemic medication

1/2 (50.0)

0/10 (0)

1/12 (8.4)

 

 Insulin (alone or with oral medication)

0/2 (0)

4/10 (40.0)

4/12 (33.3)

 

HOMA-IRb, n/N (%)

   

0.136

 Insulin resistant

2/67 (3.0)

5/42 (11.9)

7/109 (6.4)

 

 Non-insulin resistant

5/67 (7.5)

5/42 (11.9)

10/109 (9.2)

 

 Unknown insulin resistance status

60/67 (89.5)

32/42 (76.2)

92/109 (84.4)

 
  1. BMI body mass index, COCP combined oral contraceptive pill, E. coli Escherichia coli, HOMA-IR homeostatic model of assessment-insulin resistance, HVS high vaginal swab, IUD intrauterine device, IUS intrauterine system, PoMP postmenopausal, POP progesterone-only pill, PrMP premenopausal, S. aureus Staphylococcus aureus, SD standard deviation
  2. aCalculated using Fisher’s exact test. A p value of less than 0.05 demonstrates a significant difference in the distribution of the demographic of interest (e.g. ethnicity), according to obesity status
  3. bHOMA-IR was calculated according to the formula: fasting insulin (μU/L) multiplied by fasting glucose (nmol/L)/22.5. The 2nd tertile was used as the cut-off to determine insulin resistance status. Insulin resistance cut-off value, 2.98