Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of metagenome and metatranscriptome datasets

From: Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle

 

Metagenome (n = 48)

T-metatranscriptome (n = 48) (mean ± SEM)

M-metatranscriptome (n = 48)

After QC

54.63 ± 1.42 M

64.32 ± 0.74 M

55.11 ± 1.90 M

non-rDNAs/rRNAs

99.37 ± 0.03%

6.29 ± 0.16%

53.34 ± 2.14%

rDNAs/rRNAs

0.63 ± 0.03%

93.71 ± 0.16%

46.66 ± 2.14%

Host DNAs/RNAs

0.13 ± 0.06%

0.05 ± 0.01%

0.14 ± 0.05%

Reads mapped back contigs

78.47 ± 0.26%

66.85 ± 0.65%

54.43 ± 1.16%

Reads mapped back annotated contigs

62.02 ± 0.56%

33.04 ± 0.54%

32.19 ± 1.50%

eggNOG annotated reads

1,010,497 ± 32,603

23,590 ± 1494

412,875 ± 30,166

  1. QC quality control