Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of metagenome and metatranscriptome datasets

From: Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle

  Metagenome (n = 48) T-metatranscriptome (n = 48) (mean ± SEM) M-metatranscriptome (n = 48)
After QC 54.63 ± 1.42 M 64.32 ± 0.74 M 55.11 ± 1.90 M
non-rDNAs/rRNAs 99.37 ± 0.03% 6.29 ± 0.16% 53.34 ± 2.14%
rDNAs/rRNAs 0.63 ± 0.03% 93.71 ± 0.16% 46.66 ± 2.14%
Host DNAs/RNAs 0.13 ± 0.06% 0.05 ± 0.01% 0.14 ± 0.05%
Reads mapped back contigs 78.47 ± 0.26% 66.85 ± 0.65% 54.43 ± 1.16%
Reads mapped back annotated contigs 62.02 ± 0.56% 33.04 ± 0.54% 32.19 ± 1.50%
eggNOG annotated reads 1,010,497 ± 32,603 23,590 ± 1494 412,875 ± 30,166
  1. QC quality control