Skip to main content

Table 1 Pacific Biosciences circular consensus recruiting to each genome and genome coverage

From: Caught in the middle with multiple displacement amplification: the myth of pooling for avoiding multiple displacement amplification bias in a metagenome

    Control MDA5 MDA1
Genome* %GC Predicted read abundance(%) CCS reads recruited Read abundance (%) Coverage (±SD) CCS reads recruited Read abundance (%) Coverage (±SD) CCS reads recruited Read abundance (%) Coverage (±SD)
Blue7-1 61.4 15.5 4,631 25.9 98.8 (19.5) 2,380 13.2 43.8 (19.4) 1,522 13.4 33.9 (13.9)
Fuitloop-1 61.8 31.1 7,165 40.1 132.1 (25.5) 8,341 46.4 140.5 (82.4) 5,419 47.8 111.4 (65.7)
Gumball-1 59.6 20.7 1,230 6.9 15.4 (6.1) 3,460 19.2 52.5 (25.1) 2,007 17.7 37.2 (17.9)
Porky-1 63.5 25.9 3,271 18.3 46.3 (7.3) 1,401 7.8 18.1 (12.2) 889 7.8 13.6 (8.8)
Wee-1 61.8 5.2 1,127 6.3 20.3 (5.6) 2,216 12.3 35.8 (22.1) 1,391 12.3 27.3 (15.3)
Gumball-2 59.6 20.8 495 5.4 6.2 (3.0) 1,261 6.5 18.1 (9.4) 1,613 6.5 24.0 (12.6)
Lambda-2 49.9 15.6 3,737 40.7 84.7 (12.0) 10,995 56.3 208.7 (107.1) 14,284 57.5 274.6 (130.7)
Porky-2 63.5 24.5 1,121 12.2 16.1 (3.7) 664 3.4 8.2 (6.5) 815 3.3 10.1 (7.3)
T7-2 48.4 12.8 1,050 11.4 29.8 (5.6) 3,920 20.1 90.2 (30.7) 5,029 20.2 115.7 (37.7)
VBP32-2 42.5 24.9 2,616 28.5 37.5 (8.9) 2,373 12.1 27.6 (15.9) 2,821 11.4 33.5 (17.2)
  1. *-1, -2 indicates data from community one and community two, respectively. Predicted read abundances were recalculated to take into account the low recruitment of phage Athena, T4 and VBpm10. CCS, circular consensus sequencing; MDA, multiple displacement amplification.