Skip to main content
Download PDF

Bloom and bust: intestinal microbiota dynamics in response to hospital exposures and Clostridium difficile colonization or infection

Microbiome volume 4, Article number: 12 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading infectious cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing CDI because they are exposed to C. difficile spores through contact with the hospital environment and often receive antibiotics and other medications that can disrupt the integrity of the indigenous intestinal microbiota and impair colonization resistance. Using whole metagenome shotgun sequencing, we examined the diversity and composition of the fecal microbiota in a prospective cohort study of 98 hospitalized patients.

Results

Four patients had asymptomatic C. difficile colonization, and four patients developed CDI. We observed dramatic shifts in the structure of the gut microbiota during hospitalization. In contrast to CDI cases, asymptomatic patients exhibited elevated relative abundance of potentially protective bacterial taxa in their gut at the onset of C. difficile colonization. Use of laxatives was associated with significant reductions in the relative abundance of Clostridium and Eubacterium; species within these genera have previously been shown to enhance resistance to CDI via the production of secondary bile acids. Cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone exposure decreased the frequency of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, a bacterial family that has been previously associated with decreased CDI risk.

Conclusions

This study underscores the detrimental impact of antibiotics as well as other medications, particularly laxatives, on the intestinal microbiota and suggests that co-colonization with key bacterial taxa may prevent C. difficile overgrowth or the transition from asymptomatic C. difficile colonization to CDI.

Background

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. In the USA alone, there are an estimated 453,000 cases and 29,300 deaths from CDI each year [1]. CDI is associated with a wide range of syndromes, from asymptomatic colonization to mild diarrhea or more severe pseudomembranous colitis that may progress to toxic megacolon, intestinal perforation, sepsis, and death [2]. Despite advances in infection control practices and the development of new treatment options, there has been a steady increase in the incidence and severity of CDI in the last decade and outbreaks continue to occur in hospitals and health-care institutions worldwide [3, 4].

Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing CDI because they are exposed to C. difficile spores through contact with the hospital environment and often receive broad-spectrum antimicrobials that disrupt the integrity of the indigenous intestinal microbiota and impair colonization resistance (i.e., the ability of the microbiota to prevent the establishment of enteropathogens like C. difficile in the gut). Nearly all classes of antibiotics have been associated with CDI, but clindamycin, penicillins, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones seem to pose the greatest risk [5–7]. Additional risk factors for CDI include advanced age, underlying diseases, gastrointestinal surgery, nasogastric tube feeding, and use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs, a class of medications that inhibit the production of gastric acid in the stomach) [2, 8].

Among patients who acquire C. difficile in their gut, some will remain asymptomatically colonized while others may go on to develop diarrhea or more severe forms of CDI. Differences in pathogen or host factors like the immune status or the integrity of the intestinal microbiota may affect the clinical presentation of CDI. In hospitals and health-care facilities, asymptomatic carriers often outnumber symptomatic patients and may represent a considerable reservoir of C. difficile that contributes to environmental contamination and disease transmission among patients [9, 10]. It has been suggested that patients with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization are at decreased risk of developing CDI, but a recent meta-analysis has suggested this may not be the case [11, 12]. Previously, we showed that patients who have higher levels of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis were at a decreased risk of developing CDI [13], and others have demonstrated that the presence of secondary bile acid-producing bacteria such as Clostridium scindens was associated with resistance to CDI [14].

Despite the strong relationship between the intestinal microbiota and CDI susceptibility, the impact of non-antimicrobial medications on the microbiota has not been examined in detail.

In this study, we prospectively examined the intestinal microbiota of hospitalized patients at-risk for CDI. Using whole metagenome shotgun (WMGS) DNA sequencing, we specifically assessed (i) the changes in the relative abundance of microbial taxa in patients who were identified as colonized or infected with C. difficile and (ii) the impact of antibiotics and other medications on the diversity and composition of the intestinal microbiota among patients who were neither colonized nor infected with C. difficile. We postulated that protective microbiota members which are thought to mediate competitive inhibition against C. difficile (such as Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis and non-toxigenic C. difficile) [13, 15] or limit the germination and growth of C. difficile via the production of secondary bile acids (Clostridium and Eubacterium genera) [14, 16] are present in colonized but not in infected patients. We also hypothesized that not only antibiotics but also other medications such as PPIs will decrease the overall diversity of the intestinal microbiota and increase the relative abundance of opportunistic microorganisms such as enterococci and yeasts [17–20]. We report that the relative abundance of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, and Eubacterium is higher in asymptomatically colonized patients than in CDI cases. Moreover, antibiotics and other medications such as laxatives have substantial effects on the intestinal microbiota of hospitalized patients and reduce the relative abundance of these potentially protective bacterial taxa. Even though the term “infected” is sometimes used to designate people who are asymptomatically colonized with C. difficile, in this report, we will use the term “infected” (or CDI) to describe patients who are symptomatic and “colonized” to describe patients who are asymptomatically colonized with C. difficile.

Results

Subject characteristics

A total of 104 patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients did not provide any stool sample, and six stool samples were excluded because of poor library quality or sequencing results; this left a total of 98 patients and 229 fecal samples in the study. We analyzed a median of two fecal samples per patient (range, 1–15). Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The majority of patients (63 %) suffered from osteoarthritis and were admitted for orthopedic surgery; most of them (89 %) received cefazolin (a first-generation cephalosporin) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. One patient (1.0 %) had asymptomatic C. difficile colonization on admission, three patients (3.1 %) became asymptomatically colonized during hospitalization, and four patients (4.1 %) developed hospital-acquired CDI. All of the CDI cases had diarrhea during their initial episode but none of them developed recurrent CDI.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study patients
Full size table

WMGS sequencing

Fecal samples were evaluated by WMGS sequencing to assess the diversity and composition of the intestinal microbiota. We obtained a median of 6.1 million high-quality reads per sample (range, 0.6–41.9 million). The proportion of human DNA reads was highly variable (range, 0.1–94.9 %) but half of the samples contained <20 % of human reads. After removing the host DNA, we computed the frequency of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes in each sample as a measure of bacterial DNA content. The mean frequency of 16S rRNA genes per megabase (Mb) of sequence data was 0.39 (standard deviation 0.18). Across all samples, we obtained a median of 2.1 % of reads (range, 0.1–4.8 %) with a hit to MetaPhlAn2’s taxonomic marker database, with at least 2700 hits per sample. Bacteroides (99.0 %), Prevotella (98.0 %), and Subdoligranulum (98.0 %) were the most common genera, and Porphyromonadaceae (100 %), Bacteroidaceae (99.0 %), Enterobacteriaceae (98.0 %), Prevotellaceae (98.0 %), and Ruminococcaceae (98.0 %) were the most common families detected across patients (percentage of patients in which the corresponding taxa was detected).

C. difficile detection

Results from the detection of C. difficile or its toxins in eight patients who developed C. difficile colonization (n = 4) or infection (n = 4) are provided in Table 2. Out of these eight patients, six had a positive C. difficile culture result (two of the four CDI cases did not have C. difficile detected by toxigenic culture but rather with an enzyme immunoassay). All patients with a positive C. difficile culture result had a single isolate recovered and characterized. Two of the four asymptomatic carriers were colonized with a toxigenic strain. C. difficile was also detected by WMGS sequencing in two of the four asymptomatically colonized patients as well as in two CDI patients with a positive C. difficile culture result. No other patients had C. difficile detected by culture or sequencing.

Table 2 Detection of C. difficile and its toxins in four asymptomatically colonized and four CDI patients
Full size table

Intestinal microbiota dynamics in patients with C. difficile colonization or infection

Figure 1 shows variations in the relative abundance of microbial taxa, overall microbial diversity, as well as bacterial and human DNA proportions in relation to hospital exposures and length of stay for patients who became colonized (Fig. 1a–d) or infected (Fig. 1e–h) with C. difficile. The human DNA content and the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota were highly variable during patient hospitalization. In contrast, the proportion of bacterial DNA (measured after the exclusion of human DNA) was more stable.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intestinal microbiota dynamics in patients with C. difficile colonization or infection. The figure shows changes in intestinal microbiota composition (area charts or bar charts for patients with a single measurement), Shannon diversity (dash-dotted line), bacterial DNA content (dotted line), and human DNA content (solid line) during hospitalization for patients who developed C. difficile colonization (a–d) or infection (e–h). Only those microbial taxa with a relative abundance of ≥10 % in at least one sample are depicted. The y-axis on the left shows the relative abundance of microbial taxa or human DNA proportions, while the y-axis on the right shows the Shannon diversity index or bacterial DNA content (expressed as number of 16S rRNA genes per Mb). The x-axis shows the number of days after hospital admission (day 0). The figures only display information for the period from hospital admission until the last stool collection. The bars underneath the graphs indicate hospital exposures: Azithro azithromycin, Ceph cephalosporin, Chemo chemotherapeutic agent, Metro metronidazole, NSAID nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Penicillin combination penicillin with β-lactamase inhibitor, PPI proton pump inhibitor, Steroid, glucocorticoid, Vanco IV intravenous vancomycin, Vanco PO oral vancomycin. The day on which a patient had a positive C. difficile culture (Culture+), the presence of C. difficile infection symptoms, but a negative C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (CDI symptoms) or a diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI diagnosis) is also indicated

Full size image

We specifically looked at the relative abundance of potentially protective bacterial taxa, including Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, and Eubacterium. A few days prior to or at the time of C. difficile colonization, three out of four asymptomatic patients exhibited high relative abundance of these taxa in their intestinal microbiota: the relative abundance of Eubacterium was 24.3 % in patient 30 on the day C. difficile colonization was detected, the relative abundance of Anaerococcus (a Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis member) was 31.3 % in patient 87 on the day C. difficile colonization was detected, and the relative abundance of Clostridium spp. other than C. difficile (mainly Clostridium bolteae) was 22.2 % in patient 99 4 days prior to C. difficile colonization. We also observed transient increases in the relative abundance of Clostridium spp. other than C. difficile (31.0 % [mainly C. bolteae and Clostridium hathewayi] 13 days prior to CDI diagnosis, patient 55) or Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis (17.4 % 37 days prior to CDI diagnosis, patient 98; data not shown) in two of the four patients who developed CDI. However, these increases occurred several days prior to CDI onset and the corresponding bacterial taxa had a relative abundance of less than 5 % upon CDI diagnosis. In the fecal samples (n = 196) from the 90 patients who were neither colonized nor infected with C. difficile, the median abundance (range) of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, and Eubacterium was 3.1 (0.0–62.3 %), 0.4 (0.0–67.6 %), and 0.2 % (0.0–37.0 %), respectively.

We observed transient but large increases of Microvirus (reaching a relative abundance of ≥50 % in patients 30, 98, and 99), Candida (reaching a relative abundance of >30 % in patients 98 and 99), and Leuconostoc (reaching a relative abundance of >15 % in patients 98 and 99). In patients 98 and 99, the increase in the relative abundance of Microvirus was concomitant with an increase of human read proportions and a decrease of microbial diversity. In patient 98, striking blooms of Enterococcus occurred on days 16 (98.0 %), 31 (60.8 %), and 47–62 (64.8–97.5 %) after admission and appeared to follow the administration of intravenous vancomycin. In the fecal samples (n = 196) from the 90 patients who were neither colonized nor infected with C. difficile, the median abundance (range) of Microvirus, Candida, Leuconostoc, and Enterococcus was 0.0 (0.0–95.6 %), 0.0 (0.0–3.5 %), 0.0 (0.0–51.0 %), and 0.1 % (0.0–91.7 %), respectively.

Medication use and intestinal microbiota diversity and composition

We examined the effect of antibiotics as well as other medications on the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. To avoid confounding the results, we excluded patients who were colonized or infected with C. difficile (n = 8) from these analyses; therefore, the Clostridium genera does not include C. difficile. Utilization of fluoroquinolone was moderately correlated with the use of metronidazole (ρ = 0.45), as were use of penicillin with use of gentamicin (ρ = 0.57), and use of opioids with use of laxatives (ρ = 0.41).

Among patients who were neither infected nor colonized with C. difficile, we obtained a mean Shannon diversity index of 2.0 (standard deviation 0.6). Exposure to fluoroquinolones and intravenous vancomycin was associated with a significant decrease in intestinal microbiota diversity, while use of opioids was associated with an increase in diversity (Table 3).

Table 3 Associations between medication use and intestinal microbiota diversity
Full size table

A large number of microbial taxa were affected by common hospital exposures; out of a total of 125 genera and 59 families identified in at least 5 % of the patients, 88 genera (70.4 %) and 42 families (71.2 %) were associated with a statistically significant increase or decrease in relative abundance in univariable analyses (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2). With the exception of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, most medications tended to decrease, rather than increase, the relative abundance of affected microbial taxa. Carbapenems (33 genera and 13 families) and intravenous vancomycin (34 genera and 15 families) influenced the largest number of microbial taxa.

In multivariable analyses, we specifically looked at the impact of medications on the relative abundance of microbial taxa that are thought to be protective against CDI (Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, and Eubacterium) as well as opportunistic microorganisms that can overgrow as a result of antimicrobial use (Enterococcus and Candida) (Table 4). Use of laxatives was associated with significant reductions in the relative abundance of Clostridium and Eubacterium. Administration of cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, or penicillin with β-lactamase inhibitor was associated with significant reductions in the frequency of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis. Exposure to fluoroquinolones significantly increased the relative abundance of Enterococcus, while intravenous vancomycin was of borderline significance. None of the medications were associated with significant variations in the relative abundance of Candida in multivariable analyses.

Table 4 Multivariable analysis of medications associated with selected microbial taxa
Full size table

Discussion

We previously demonstrated that a reduction in Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis is significantly and independently associated with the risk of CDI in a distinct patient population [13]. Certain species within the Eubacterium and Clostridium genera, notably C. scindens, have the ability to convert primary bile acids into secondary bile acids [16] and have been shown to strongly inhibit C. difficile in the intestinal microbiota of antibiotic-treated mice and humans [14]. In this study, asymptomatically colonized patients, but not CDI cases, exhibited elevated relative abundance of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, or Eubacterium in their gut shortly prior to or when C. difficile colonization was detected. These observations are in agreement with our initial hypothesis and suggest that co-colonization with any of these potentially protective bacterial taxa might prevent C. difficile overgrowth in colonized subjects or the transition from asymptomatic colonization to a full-blown infection.

Previous studies have shown that in the absence of gross perturbation, the intestinal microbiota of healthy subjects is relatively stable over time [21, 22]. In contrast, we observed dramatic shifts in the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota in patients who developed C. difficile colonization or infection, as well as in other hospitalized patients (data not shown). These observations suggest that single measurements of the intestinal microbiota may be problematic when studying hospitalized patients, in particular, as their microbiota composition is strongly influenced by their illness and medical interventions. This offers one explanation why some studies examining the role of the intestinal microbiota on health outcomes may yield conflicting results.

In a previous study, we showed that fecal excretion of human DNA was significantly increased in patients with CDI or having other gastrointestinal problems and appeared to be an outcome of intestinal inflammation [23]. In this study, the proportion of human DNA was highly variable over time but was observed to be higher prior to CDI development in two of the four cases. In some of our patients, increases in the proportion of human DNA were concomitant with a reduction of microbial diversity and increases in the relative abundance of Microvirus. Microviruses are single-stranded DNA bacteriophages that infect enterobacteria and are commonly found in human gut samples [24]. High levels of human DNA excretion have been associated with a reduction of intestinal microbiota diversity [23].

One of the patients who developed CDI (patient 98) exhibited striking blooms of Enterococcus (with frequencies reaching 98 %) on multiple occasions during his hospitalization. These blooms appeared to follow the administration of intravenous vancomycin and may represent an overgrowth of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Studies have shown that the use of intravenous vancomycin is significantly associated with VRE colonization or infection [25]. Although we do not know whether this patient actually carried VRE or developed sepsis, Ubeda et al. have previously shown that intestinal domination by VRE typically precedes bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients [26]. In the cohort of patients who were neither colonized nor infected with C. difficile, we confirm that the use of intravenous vancomycin is associated with increases in the relative abundance of Enterococcus.

Receipt of opioids was associated with significant increases in microbial diversity. This medication typically delays gastrointestinal transit time and may facilitate microbial growth in the colon, thereby increasing diversity. Significant reductions in intestinal microbiota diversity were only associated with the use of fluoroquinolones and intravenous vancomycin. Surprisingly, exposure to other antibiotics and PPIs did not reduce overall microbiota diversity in our cohort but did influence the relative abundance of numerous microbial taxa. The association between PPIs and CDI development is still a controversial issue [27]. The notion of reduced microbiota diversity may suggest that the number and relative abundance of microbial taxa are both declining. However, our study suggests that microbiota dynamics are much more complex; many taxa are being depleted while others are blooming. Therefore, measurement of the overall diversity is masking important distortions in the composition of the microbial community.

In multivariable analyses, we showed that the use of laxatives is associated with significant reductions in the relative abundance of Clostridium and Eubacterium; certain species among these genera may confer protection against CDI via the production of secondary bile acids. However, in a post hoc analysis, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway corresponding to secondary bile acid biosynthesis (ko00121) was not detected in any our metagenomic samples. Laxatives accelerate gastrointestinal transit time and may have detrimental effects on the intestinal microbiota. van der Wulp et al. previously showed that treatment with polyethylene glycol (an osmotic laxative) changes the composition of the intestinal microbiota and decreases the production of secondary bile acids in rats [28]. We also demonstrated that the use of cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and penicillin with β-lactamase inhibitors is significantly and independently associated with reductions in the relative abundance of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis representatives. Since cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone exposure, as well as depletions of Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, have been associated with CDI risk [13], this provides a potential explanation for why these antibiotics increase the susceptibility to CDI in hospitalized patients.

We observed discrepancies in the detection of C. difficile or its toxins by culture, WMGS sequencing, and enzyme immunoassay. In two of the four asymptomatically colonized patients, C. difficile was detected by culture but not by WMGS sequencing. In two of the four CDI cases, C. difficile could not be detected, either by culture or sequencing (their CDI diagnosis was based on a positive enzyme immunoassay performed at the hospital). This may be due to a low organism load, the lack of biomass collected with the rectal swabs, or insufficient sequencing depth. One patient (patient 98) received vancomycin and metronidazole treatment for presumptive CDI prior to the actual diagnosis by enzyme immunoassay, which may have reduced the quantity of C. difficile organisms available for detection.

The number of patients who developed C. difficile colonization or infection was limited in our study; therefore, we could not perform statistical analyses to assess the role of hospital exposures and microbial taxa for patients with these outcomes. In all of the four patients who developed asymptomatic colonization, C. difficile was detected by culture in the last stool collected prior to patient discharge. Therefore, we could not determine whether C. difficile colonization was transient (present in only one occasion) or not in these patients. In the full cohort, insufficient numbers of patients exposed to certain medications (e.g., metronidazole and cotrimoxazole) or colonized by specific microbial taxa (e.g., Aerococcus and Microbacteriaceae) precluded statistical analyses. Diet and other factors such as underlying disease state can affect the intestinal microbiota and could still confound the associations identified in our study.

Conclusions

The integrity of the intestinal microbiota is intricately related to the health of the host. In this study, we show that the diversity and composition of the intestinal microbiota in hospitalized patients is highly dynamic. Use of antibiotics, as well as other non-antimicrobial medications, particularly laxatives, has a profound and rapid effect on the structure of the intestinal microbiota and significantly decreased the relative abundance of key bacterial taxa that may be involved in CDI protection. Our results also support the hypothesis that co-colonization with key bacterial taxa such as Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, or Eubacterium may prevent C. difficile overgrowth or the transition from asymptomatic C. difficile colonization to CDI. A better understanding of CDI pathogenesis, including the medical exposures that undermine the effectiveness of colonization resistance and the specific microbiota alterations that allow C. difficile to infect the gut, will contribute to our ability to develop novel clinical strategies to prevent or treat this life-threatening infection.

Methods

Patient recruitment and follow-up

Research subjects were recruited as part of a prospective cohort study conducted at the Jewish General Hospital (JGH) in Montréal between October 2009 and April 2011. Patients ≥60 years of age, who were expected to stay more than 2 days in the hospital at the time of study enrolment, and who had received antimicrobials in the previous 48 h or were expected to receive some in the next 24 h were eligible to participate in the study. Patients admitted to the hospital for CDI were excluded. Subjects were enrolled in the study within 5 days after admission to selected medical wards or surgical units. Patients were followed for 60 days after study enrolment or 30 days after hospital discharge (whichever came first) to ascertain the development of CDI. CDI cases were followed for 60 days after successfully completing CDI treatment to monitor the development of recurrent CDI.

Ethics, consent, and permissions

All study participants provided informed written consent. The Research Ethics Boards of the JGH (08-118A) and the McGill University Health Centre (11-205 GEN) approved the research protocol.

Sample and epidemiologic data collection

Fecal specimens were obtained from each patient at study enrollment, every 3 days during hospitalization, at the onset of diarrhea (if applicable), and at discharge. The samples were collected as bulk stool or with the use of a rectal swab if the patient was not producing stool. Rectal swabs are a convenient means of sampling the human gut and give highly reproducible microbiota profiles that can closely resemble that of fecal samples [29]. Epidemiologic information was extracted from the patients’ medical charts and included patient demographics, previous hospitalizations, reason of admission, disease severity index, dates of admission and discharge, CDI diagnosis, and the use of antimicrobials and other medications during hospitalization (with corresponding start and stop dates).

Toxigenic C. difficile culture

Toxigenic culture test results were provided as a courtesy of Dr. Dale N. Gerding (Hines VA Hospital and Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, IL). Briefly, stool or rectal swab specimens were streaked onto selective pre-reduced cefoxitin-cycloserine-fructose agar supplemented with taurocholate (TCCFA) and incubated anaerobically for 48 h. Presumptive identification of C. difficile was based on typical colony morphology. If colony morphologies suggested that a mixture of C. difficile strains were present, multiple colonies were picked and saved individually. All rectal swabs were also inoculated onto non-selective blood agar to detect the growth of intestinal microbiota and confirm proper sampling technique, thereby excluding the possibility of false-negative results on the TCCFA. Purified isolates were characterized by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) to determine their toxin classification [30]. The Bartels Cytotoxicity Assay (Trinity Biotech) was performed to determine the presence of toxin B in C. difficile isolates with an undetermined REA group.

Study definitions

CDI was defined as follows: (i) the presence of symptoms (diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain, or ileus) and a positive C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (ImmunoCard Toxins A&B, Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) or toxigenic culture, (ii) an endoscopic diagnosis of pseudomembranes, or (iii) a pathological/histological diagnosis of CDI. Diarrhea was defined as the passage of ≥3 new unformed stools within 24 h. Recurrent CDI was defined as a CDI diagnosis that occurs within 60 days after successfully completing the treatment for the initial episode of CDI. Asymptomatic C. difficile colonization was defined as a positive stool culture for C. difficile and the absence of a CDI diagnosis during follow-up. Colonization or infection was considered hospital-acquired if the diagnosis was made ≥48 h after hospital admission and during the study follow-up period.

WMGS sequencing and data analysis

Total DNA was extracted from rectal swabs with use of the DNA IQ System (Promega) and from bulk stool aliquots with the use of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen). Multiplexed DNA libraries were prepared according to a previously described protocol that allows the generation of libraries from low amounts of input DNA [31]. WMGS sequencing was performed with 150-nucleotide read lengths on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 and 2500 platforms at the McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre. Up to 14 samples were multiplexed in each sequencing lane. Reads derived from the human genome were identified and removed with BMTagger [32]. Additional quality filtering steps included the trimming of sequencing adapters and low-quality bases from the 3′ end of reads as well as the removal of short (<60 bases) and duplicate reads [33, 34]. We retrieved all reads containing the V1–V3 reverse primer sequence (which targets a segment of the 16S rRNA gene) [35] and their 3′ sequences in order to obtain 55-mers originating with the primer sequence. The frequency of 16S rRNA genes (55-mers) per Mb of sequence data was used as a measure of bacterial DNA content in each sample. High-quality reads were also analyzed by MetaPhlAn2 [36] in order to determine the family, genus, and species level relative abundances. Diversity was calculated at the genus level with the Shannon index. HUMAnN version 0.99 [37] was used in conjunction with RAPSearch2 [38] and the KEGG database [39] to evaluate the presence of the pathway for secondary bile acid biosynthesis (ko00121) in each metagenomic sample.

Statistical analyses

We provide a descriptive analysis of microbiota composition for patients who were either colonized or infected by C. difficile; we specifically examined changes in the relative abundance of potential CDI-protecting microorganisms (i.e., Clostridiales Family XI Incertae Sedis, Clostridium, and Eubacterium). In order to assess the relationship between hospital exposures (e.g., antibiotics and other medications) and either overall microbiota diversity or relative abundance of microbiota members, we used generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses with a Gaussian link. GEE takes into account the multiple samples per subject and the likelihood that the microbiota profiles are correlated over time within patients. Microbial diversity and relative abundances were modeled using a log transformation. In these analyses, we excluded patients who were colonized or infected with C. difficile and considered only those microbial taxa and medications that were present in or administered to at least 5 % of the patients (i.e., cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, penicillin with β-lactamase inhibitors, carbapenems, intravenous vancomycin, glucocorticoids, laxatives, NSAIDs, opioids, and PPIs). Use of medication was treated as a binary variable with “1” indicating exposure within 1 to 3 days prior to stool collection and “0” indicating otherwise. We included exposure to intravenous vancomycin in our analyses, as evidence suggests that substantial amounts of the drug can be excreted in the bowel and may therefore affect the intestinal microbiota [40]. Multivariable analyses were used in order to take into account the correlation in the use of certain medications. In addition to the medications mentioned above, all multivariable models included adjustment for age, sex, and duration of hospitalization. Final multivariable models retained significant exposure variables at a p value of <0.05. A positive estimate value indicates that the corresponding exposure is associated with an increase in either overall microbiota diversity or relative abundance of the given microbial taxa. All statistical analyses were performed in R [41]; GEE was performed using the geepack package. P values were determined by using the GEE-derived robust z scores.

Availability of supporting data

The sequence data supporting the results of this article are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP064400 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP064400).

Abbreviations

CDI:

Clostridium difficile infection

PPI:

proton pump inhibitors

WMGS:

whole metagenome shotgun

TCCFA:

cefoxitin-cycloserine-fructose agar supplemented with taurocholate

REA:

restriction endonuclease analysis

GEE:

generalized estimating equations

rRNA:

ribosomal RNA

VRE:

vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

JGH:

Jewish General Hospital

NSAID:

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

References

  1. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):825–34. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG, Ananthakrishnan AN, Curry SR, Gilligan PH, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(4):478–98. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4. quiz 99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Tull P. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12 Suppl 6:2–18. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01580.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile—more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(18):1932–40. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0707500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ananthakrishnan AN. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, risk factors and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8(1):17–26. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2010.190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Owens Jr RC, Donskey CJ, Gaynes RP, Loo VG, Muto CA. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46 Suppl 1:S19–31. doi:10.1086/521859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pepin J, Saheb N, Coulombe MA, Alary ME, Corriveau MP, Authier S, et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an epidemic in Quebec. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1254–60. doi:10.1086/496986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vesteinsdottir I, Gudlaugsdottir S, Einarsdottir R, Kalaitzakis E, Sigurdardottir O, Bjornsson ES. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile toxin-positive diarrhea: a population-based prospective case-control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(10):2601–10. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1603-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riggs MM, Sethi AK, Zabarsky TF, Eckstein EC, Jump RL, Donskey CJ. Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic Clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility residents. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(8):992–8. doi:10.1086/521854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eyre DW, Cule ML, Wilson DJ, Griffiths D, Vaughan A, O’Connor L, et al. Diverse sources of C. difficile infection identified on whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(13):1195–205. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1216064.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shim JK, Johnson S, Samore MH, Bliss DZ, Gerding DN. Primary symptomless colonisation by Clostridium difficile and decreased risk of subsequent diarrhoea. Lancet. 1998;351(9103):633–6. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08062-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zacharioudakis IM, Zervou FN, Pliakos EE, Ziakas PD, Mylonakis E. Colonization with toxinogenic C. difficile upon hospital admission, and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(3):381–90. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.22. quiz 91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vincent C, Stephens DA, Loo VG, Edens TJ, Behr MA, Dewar K, et al. Reductions in intestinal Clostridiales precede the development of nosocomial Clostridium difficile infection. Microbiome. 2013;1(18):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buffie CG, Bucci V, Stein RR, McKenney PT, Ling L, Gobourne A, et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature. 2015;517(7533):205–8. doi:10.1038/nature13828.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerding DN, Meyer T, Lee C, Cohen SH, Murthy UK, Poirier A, et al. Administration of spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3 for prevention of recurrent C difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(17):1719–27. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.3725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guérard P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens. 2014;3:14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seto CT, Jeraldo P, Orenstein R, Chia N, DiBaise JK. Prolonged use of a proton pump inhibitor reduces microbial diversity: implications for Clostridium difficile susceptibility. Microbiome. 2014;2:42. doi:10.1186/2049-2618-2-42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Donskey CJ, Chowdhry TK, Hecker MT, Hoyen CK, Hanrahan JA, Hujer AM, et al. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(26):1925–32. doi:10.1056/NEJM200012283432604.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan A, Edlund C, Nord CE. Effect of antimicrobial agents on the ecological balance of human microflora. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1(2):101–14. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00066-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Freedberg DE, Toussaint NC, Chen SP, Ratner AJ, Whittier S, Wang TC, et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter specific taxa in the human gastrointestinal microbiome: a crossover trial. Gastroenterology. 2015. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.043.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, Subramanian S, Seedorf H, Goodman AL, et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science. 2013;341(6141):1237439. doi:10.1126/science.1237439.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jalanka-Tuovinen J, Salonen A, Nikkila J, Immonen O, Kekkonen R, Lahti L, et al. Intestinal microbiota in healthy adults: temporal analysis reveals individual and common core and relation to intestinal symptoms. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e23035. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023035.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vincent C, Mehrotra S, Loo VG, Dewar K, Manges AR. Excretion of host DNA in feces is associated with risk of Clostridium difficile infection. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:246203. doi:10.1155/2015/246203.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fane BA, Brentlinger KL, Burch AD, Chen M, Hafenstein S, Moore E, et al. The Microviridae. The Bacteriophages. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gerding DN. Is there a relationship between vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection and Clostridium difficile infection? Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25 Suppl 2:S206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, et al. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4332–41. doi:10.1172/JCI43918.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Proton pump inhibitors and C. difficile: a review of the clinical evidence. 2014. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/htis/dec-2014/RC0582%20PPIs%20and%20C%20Difficile%20Final.pdf.

  28. van der Wulp MY, Derrien M, Stellaard F, Wolters H, Kleerebezem M, Dekker J, et al. Laxative treatment with polyethylene glycol decreases microbial primary bile salt dehydroxylation and lipid metabolism in the intestine of rats. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013;305(7):G474–82. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00375.2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Budding AE, Grasman ME, Eck A, Bogaards JA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, van Bodegraven AA, et al. Rectal swabs for analysis of the intestinal microbiota. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101344. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101344.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Clabots CR, Johnson S, Bettin KM, Mathie PA, Mulligan ME, Schaberg DR, et al. Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(7):1870–5.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meyer M, Kircher M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;2010(6):pdb prot5448. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. BMTagger. ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/agarwala/bmtagger/.

  33. Niu B, Fu L, Sun S, Li W. Artificial and natural duplicates in pyrosequencing reads of metagenomic data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:187. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-187.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group. 16S 454 sequencing protocol. 2010. http://hmpdacc.org/doc/16S_Sequencing_SOP_4.2.2.pdf.

  36. Truong DT, Franzosa EA, Tickle TL, Scholz M, Weingart G, Pasolli E, et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12(10):902–3. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Abubucker S, Segata N, Goll J, Schubert AM, Izard J, Cantarel BL, et al. Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(6):e1002358. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002358.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao Y, Tang H, Ye Y. RAPSearch2: a fast and memory-efficient protein similarity search tool for next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(1):125–6. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr595.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Currie BP, Lemos-Filho L. Evidence for biliary excretion of vancomycin into stool during intravenous therapy: potential implications for rectal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(11):4427–9. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.11.4427-4429.2004.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. The R project for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Dale N. Gerding for the toxigenic C. difficile culture, REA typing, and cytotoxicity assays done as part of a parallel study on the same patient cohort. They also thank the clinical research staff at the JGH, Jennifer Eastmond, Romina Gheorghe, and Sophie Florencio, for their valuable help with the collection of clinical samples and the chart reviews. This work was supported by a Pfizer ASPIRE Award in Antibacterial Research [WS1954106 to A.R.M.], a Studentship from the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre [C.V.], as well as a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship (Doctoral Award) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [GSD-113375 to C.V.]. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Caroline Vincent

  2. Génome Québec Innovation Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Caroline Vincent & Ken Dewar

  3. Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Mark A. Miller

  4. Devil’s Staircase Consulting, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Thaddeus J. Edens

  5. New York Genome Center, New York, NY, USA

    Sudeep Mehrotra

  6. Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

    Ken Dewar

  7. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    Amee R. Manges

Authors
  1. Caroline Vincent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark A. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thaddeus J. Edens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sudeep Mehrotra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ken Dewar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amee R. Manges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amee R. Manges.

Additional information

Competing interests

MAM has been an employee of bioMerieux since October 2012. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CV prepared the sequencing libraries, performed the bioinformatic analyses, participated in data analysis and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. MAM provided patient epidemiologic information and clinical samples and participated in data analysis and interpretation. TJE performed the statistical analyses. SM assisted with bioinformatic analyses. KD participated in data analysis and interpretation. ARM conceived and designed the study, participated in data analysis and interpretation, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Significant associations between medication use and intestinal microbiota genera (univariable analysis). (XLSX 433 KB)

Additional file 2:

Table S2. Significant associations between medication use and intestinal microbiota families (univariable analysis). (XLSX 385 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vincent, C., Miller, M.A., Edens, T.J. et al. Bloom and bust: intestinal microbiota dynamics in response to hospital exposures and Clostridium difficile colonization or infection. Microbiome 4, 12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0156-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0156-3

Keywords

Microbiome

ISSN: 2049-2618

Contact us